Search Results (239)

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive primary brain tumor, characterized by rapid progression, profound heterogeneity, and resistance to conventional therapies. This review provides an integrated overview of GBM’s pathophysiology, highlighting key mechanisms such as neuroinflammation, genetic alterations (e.g., EGFR, PDGFRA), the tumor microenvironment, microbiome interactions, and molecular dysregulations involving gangliosides and sphingolipids. Current diagnostic strategies, including imaging, histopathology, immunohistochemistry, and emerging liquid biopsy techniques, are explored for their role in improving early detection and monitoring. Treatment remains challenging, with standard therapies—surgery, radiotherapy, and temozolomide—offering limited survival benefits. Innovative therapies are increasingly being explored and implemented, including immune checkpoint inhibitors, CAR-T cell therapy, dendritic and peptide vaccines, and oncolytic virotherapy. Advances in nanotechnology and personalized medicine, such as individualized multimodal immunotherapy and NanoTherm therapy, are also discussed as strategies to overcome the blood–brain barrier and tumor heterogeneity. Additionally, stem cell-based approaches show promise in targeted drug delivery and immune modulation. Non-conventional strategies such as ketogenic diets and palliative care are also evaluated for their adjunctive potential. While novel therapies hold promise, GBM’s complexity demands continued interdisciplinary research to improve prognosis, treatment response, and patient quality of life. This review underscores the urgent need for personalized, multimodal strategies in combating this devastating malignancy. Full article

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) has emerged as a pivotal treatment modality for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), offering highly precise, high-dose radiation delivery. However, several clinical challenges remain, particularly in the treatment of central or ultracentral tumors, which are located near critical structures such as the heart, bronchi, and great vessels. The introduction of MRI-guided SBRT has significantly improved targeting precision, allowing for better assessment of tumor motion and adjacent organ structures. Additionally, SBRT has demonstrated efficacy in multifocal NSCLC, providing an effective option for patients with multiple primary tumors. Recent advances also highlight the role of SBRT in locally advanced NSCLC, where it is increasingly used as a complementary approach to concurrent chemotherapy or in cases where surgery is not feasible. Moreover, the combination of SBRT with immunotherapy has shown promising potential, enhancing tumor control and immunological responses. Furthermore, SBRTs application in SCLC is gaining momentum as a palliative and potentially curative option for selected patients. This narrative review explores these evolving clinical scenarios, the technical innovations supporting SBRT, and the integration of immunotherapy, providing an in-depth look at the new frontiers of SBRT in lung cancer treatment. Despite the challenges, the ongoing development of personalized approaches and technological advancements continues to push the boundaries of SBRTs clinical utility in lung cancer. Full article

Background: Patients bearing large-volume, bulky primary or relapsed tumors, are usually referred to palliative low-dose radiotherapy with very poor results. Lattice Radiation Therapy (LRT) is able to produce a high number of high-dose foci or vortexes (multiple SBRT treatments), separated by low-dose zones (valleys). Treatment planning on vortex placing, valley definition, and dose administered depends on individual decisions of the treating team. The aim of our study is to assess for the first time the possibility of a dense fractionated LRT within the target volume. Methods: A total of 22 treatments in 20 patients were performed in the frame of a prospective observational study of fractionated LRT ongoing in our institution. According to our aim of achieving dense LRT, no GTV contraction was considered to create the LRTV (GTV is equal to LRTV). The vortexes were segmented as 1 cm diameter at a 1.5 cm vortex-to-vortex distance. Dose prescription to the vortexes per fraction was 12 Gy. Results: The vortex/LRTV ratio was 7.38 ± 2.13% (3.4–10.40%, median 7.60%). Mean dose to the vortex volume was 11.90 ± 0.09 Gy (11.70–12.10 Gy, median 11.90 Gy). Mean dose administered to the valley volume was 8.29 ± 0.70 (7.05–9.51 Gy, median 8.29 Gy). Valley/vortex (peak) dose ratio (VPDR) was 69.40 ± 6.02% (59.00–79.80%, median 69.70%). The mean peripheral tumor dose was 5.11 ± 0.8710 Gy (3.16–6.78 Gy, median 5.18 Gy). Conclusions: Our dense LRT schedule fulfilled most of the recommended guidelines for LRT, increasing the high dose points without risking the dose to the surrounding tissues. Further analysis of feasibility and safety are needed to secure the clinical relevance of our proposed protocol. Full article

Objective: The SHARON (Short course RadiatiON therapy for palliative treatment) Bone trial is a phase III randomized non-inferiority multicentric study comparing symptom relief for complicated bone metastases (BMs) achieved through hypofractionated accelerated palliative radiotherapy (RT) to a standard RT regimen. Methods: Eligible participants were adults with ECOG PS ≤ 3 who were referred for palliative RT for painful BMs. Patients were assigned to receive either 30 Gy delivered in 10 daily fractions or 20 Gy in 4 fractions over two consecutive days. The primary outcome was pain relief one month post-treatment. Pain relief and adverse events were also evaluated at 2, 3, 6, and 12 months after RT. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03503682). Results: Between February 2018 and November 2021, 83 patients were enrolled (30 Gy: 41; 20 Gy: 42). In the standard RT group, five patients did not complete the prescribed RT, while none in the experimental arm discontinued treatment (p = 0.026). Due to early mortality, the primary endpoint was evaluable in 73 patients (35 and 38 in the standard and experimental arms, respectively). The rate of complete pain response at one month was 22.9% and 28.9% in the 30 Gy and 20 Gy arms, respectively (p: 0.571). The overall pain response rates, which included complete and partial responses, were 74.3% and 78.9% in the 30 Gy and 20 Gy arms, respectively (p = 0.638), when considering at least a 2-point reduction in the numerical rating scale. In both arms, 4.8% of patients experienced Grade >2 toxicity. Conclusions: Administering 20 Gy in four fractions twice a day is non-inferior to the standard 30 Gy delivered in 10 fractions for pain relief in the context of complicated BMs. Furthermore, this regimen demonstrated comparable safety in terms of acute toxicity, with a lower incidence of definitive interruptions of radiotherapy. Full article

To evaluate the factors influencing the outcomes of patients who underwent surgical resection of brain metastasis followed by either surveillance or post-operative stereotactic radiosurgery/fractionated radiotherapy (SRS/SFRT), a retrospective multi-center chart review was performed on all patients who underwent brain metastases resection in British Columbia between 2018 and 2020. Patients with prior whole-brain radiotherapy were excluded from the study. The primary study endpoints included local recurrence, distant intracranial control, radionecrosis (RN), leptomeningeal disease (LMD), and overall survival (OS). The Kaplan–Meier method was used to analyze survival. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to perform univariable (UVA) and multivariable (MVA) analyses to identify predictors of local control. A total of 113 patients met the inclusion criteria. A total of 31 patients received adjuvant SRS/SFRT to the surgical cavity, while 82 went on observation. The 12-month local control was 69% (50–88%) for the SRS/SFRT cohort and 31% (18–45%) for the observation cohort (p < 0.001). The 12-month distant intracranial control was 44% (26–63%) for the SRS/SFRT cohort and 46% (30–62%) for the observation cohort (p = 0.9). Sensitivity analysis did not show a difference in overall survival (p = 0.6). En bloc resection (p < 0.05), resection without residual disease (p < 0.05), and SRS/SFRT (p < 0.001) were predictive of local control on MVA. Three SRS/SFRT patients (10%) and two observation patients (2%) developed LMD. Four SRS/SFRT patients experienced RN (13%), with no grade 3 or higher toxicities observed. Post-operative SRT outcomes based on real-world population data are consistent with the data from clinical trials and support the established guidelines. For patients requiring surgical resection of brain metastasis, en bloc gross total resection should be encouraged when feasible to reduce local recurrence. Full article

The applicability of RHT in the treatment and supportive care of tumors has been discussed for years in many publications. There are hundreds of articles that have reported on the good acceptance and feasibility of HT, as well as its value in terms of controlling malignant diseases, enhancing response and, in some randomized controlled trials (RCTs), clear improvements in OS. Despite this, HT has never fully been accepted as a standard treatment among radiation and medical oncologists. The increased activity that HT offers in the context of chemotherapy (CHT), radiotherapy (RT), chemoradiotherapy (CRT), and immunotherapy, thus facilitating programmed cell death (PCD), has been documented in many studies. This aspect has been demonstrated in many tumors, including soft tissue sarcoma, cancers of the cervix, esophagus, stomach, colon/rectum, pancreas, breast, head and neck, and prostate, and bone metastases. HT improves cancer cell death through many modalities, targeting both the tumor microenvironment (TME) and the cancer cells directly. Targeted HT increases the temperature of the primary tumor and surrounding tissues to 39–43 °C, causing the tumor cells to become more immune-responsive. HT can also activate the immune response of the TME through inducing heat shock proteins (HSPs), which also promote an immunological response and PCD. HT can oxygenate hypoxic tumors, facilitating RT-induced DNA damage in cancer cells. At present, it seems that the combination of HT and RT, CHT, and immunotherapy might lead to immune enhancement effects in the TME, making cancer cells more responsive to immunotherapies. This narrative review presents the novel aspects of HT reported in recent years. Full article

Background and Objectives: Standard treatment in metastatic breast cancer with positive estrogen receptors and negative HER2neu is represented by CDK4 inhibitors combined with aromatase inhibitors or fulvestrant. Palliative radiotherapy is indicated for symptoms or local–regional control. Multiple preclinical data suggest a potential synergistic effect when CDK4/6 inhibitors and radiotherapy are administered concurrently. We are trying to address some questions and/or to establish correlations within a subgroup of patients with unusual toxicities, the safety of combined treatments, the correlation with radiotherapy techniques and fractionation schemas. Also, we are aware that some organs at risk of a rapid turnover are more vulnerable to the occurrence of acute toxicities. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study includes 20 patients with metastatic breast cancer, treated with CDK4 inhibitors and radiotherapy on 29 disease sites; we followed the compliance and toxicities of combined treatments. Results: Regarding the recorded hematological toxicities, grade 1 associated with CDK4 inhibitors, occurring anterior radiotherapy was recorded; grade 2, leucopenia during radiotherapy presented in three cases without radiotherapy interrupting and leucopenia with neutropenia grade 3 presented in one case after pleural secondary lesion’s irradiation. Non-hematological grade 3 toxicities occurred in two cases: one case with grade 3 enteritis, at 2 weeks from bone metastases irradiation—iliac bone (in field toxicity) and one case with radiodermitis during radiotherapy on the breast and lymph node level, in the second week of external radiotherapy (RTE). Conclusions: In all analyzed cases, we obtained control of irradiated lesions. Secondary toxicities occurred only in irradiated areas. A close monitoring of patients during combined treatment must be considered and we are confident that in the future it will be possible to identify the subgroup of patients with a high risk of unusual toxicities occurring; additionally, we hope that using more conforming radiotherapy techniques minimizes the organ being at risk from radiation doses. Full article

Radiation therapy is a medical treatment that uses high doses of radiation to kill or damage cancer cells. It works by damaging the DNA within the cancer cells, ultimately causing cell death. Radiotherapy can be used as a primary treatment, adjuvant treatment in combination with surgery or chemotherapy or palliative treatment to relieve symptoms in advanced cancer stages. Radiation therapy is constantly improving in order to enhance the effect on cancer cells and reduce the side effects on healthy tissues. Our results clearly demonstrate that proton therapy and, even more, carbon ion therapy appear as promising alternatives to overcome the radioresistance of various tumors thanks to less dependency on oxygen and a better ability to kill cancer stem cells. Interestingly, hadrons also retain the advantages of radiosensitization approaches. These data confirm the great ability of hadrons to spare healthy tissue near the tumor via various mechanisms (reduced lymphopenia, bystander effect, etc.). Technology and machine improvements such as image-guided radiotherapy or particle therapies can improve treatment quality and efficacy (dose deposition and biological effect) in tumors while increasingly sparing healthy tissues. Radiation biology can help to understand how cancer cells resist radiation (hypoxia, DNA repair mechanisms, stem cell status, cell cycle position, etc.), how normal tissues may display sensitivity to radiation and how radiation effects can be increased with either radiosensitizers or accelerated particles. All these research topics are under investigation within the ARCHADE research community in France. By focusing on these areas, radiotherapy can become more effective, targeted and safe, enhancing the overall treatment experience and outcomes for cancer patients. Our goal is to provide biological evidence of the therapeutic advantages of hadrontherapy, according to the tumor characteristics. This article aims to give an updated view of our research in radiation biology within the frame of the French “ARCHADE association” and new perspectives on research and treatment with the C400 multi-ions accelerator prototype. Full article

Bone metastases are a prevalent and debilitating consequence of various cancers, including breast and prostate carcinomas, which significantly compromise patient quality of life due to pain, fractures, and other skeletal-related events (SREs). This review examines the pathophysiology of bone metastases, emphasizing the role of the bone microenvironment in tumor progression through mechanisms such as osteotropism and the dysregulated bone remodeling cycle. The primary focus is on the emerging nano-drug delivery systems (DDS) designed to target the bone microenvironment and improve the therapeutic index of anticancer agents. Current treatments, mainly comprising bisphosphonates and radiotherapy, provide palliative benefits but often have limited efficacy and significant side effects. Innovative strategies, such as bisphosphonate-conjugated nanoparticles and targeted therapies that utilize the unique bone marrow niche, are explored for their potential to enhance drug accumulation at metastatic sites while minimizing systemic toxicity. These approaches include the use of liposomes, polymeric nanoparticles, and inorganic nanoparticles, which can be functionalized to exploit the biological barriers within the bone microenvironment. This review also discusses the challenges and future directions for nano-DDS in clinical settings, emphasizing the need for multidisciplinary research to effectively integrate these technologies into standard care protocols. Full article

Introduction: Radiotherapy (RT) is a frequently offered treatment option for brain metastases (BMs) in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study presents patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in a cohort of NSCLC with BMs treated with RT. This study researched how PRO scores at the start of RT may be useful in survival estimates and how PROs change over time after RT. Methods: NSCLC patients with first-time BMs treated with RT were identified in a prospective observational study. PROs were collected at the start of RT and monthly for up to 1 year. Differences in PRO mean scores at the start of RT (M0) and at month 2 (M2) after treatment are reported. Prognostic values of PROs were analyzed in a stepwise adjusted Cox model. Results: Of 294 patients identified, 239 (81%) responded at M0; 105/239 (44%) responded at both M0 and M2. High scores for weakness of legs at M0 were associated with short survival when adjusting for performance status and status of extracranial metastases. Those responding at M0 only had worse mean scores for overall QoL and PF but similar scores for fatigue and dyspnea compared to patients responding over time. At M2, patients with <6 months survival after RT reported worse scores for overall QoL, PF, fatigue, and dyspnea; long-term survivors reported stable scores. Conclusions: NSCLC patients diagnosed with BMs and expected survival < 6 months should be offered optimal palliative care rather than RT. Full article

A 56-year-old female with a history of Luminal A breast cancer, previously treated with surgery, radiotherapy, and systemic therapy, underwent palliative re-irradiation in November 2024 for painful bone metastases. Three weeks later, following the initiation of Fulvestrant, she developed a grade 3 erythematous reaction localized to the re-irradiated area. The reaction persisted with minimal improvement over two months, despite symptomatic management. No infectious or allergic etiologies were identified, and dosimetric analysis confirmed that the delivered radiation dose to the skin was insufficient to directly induce such a reaction. Notably, the erythema was most pronounced along a pre-existing surgical scar, suggesting a localized inflammatory response. Given the temporal relationship with Fulvestrant administration, we hypothesize a drug-induced recall-like phenomenon, though no previous reports have specifically linked Fulvestrant to such an event. This case underscores the need for awareness of unexpected cutaneous reactions following re-irradiation and highlights the potential role of systemic therapies in modulating local tissue responses. Full article

Background and Clinical Significance: The current study aims to show the diagnostic challenge of mandibular exposed necrotic bone in a patient with locally aggressive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the lower lip and carrying risk factors for osteoradionecrosis and medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws. Case Presentation: In March 2023, an 80-year-old ex-farmer male patient complaining of feeding difficulty showed a 3 cm area of exposed bone in the left region of the mandible. In July 2020, the patient underwent an incisional biopsy of a lower labial cutaneous keratinizing squamous cell carcinoma, which developed within actinic cheilitis. The cancer was unresectable due to the extent of the local invasion; thus, the patient underwent radiotherapy. In February 2022, the cancer reached the left mandibular canal by completely infiltrating the homolateral canal of the mental nerve. Therefore, the oncologist prescribed cemiplimab and denosumab as palliative immunotherapy. The differential diagnosis included osteoradionecrosis, stage-III medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws, and intraoral localization of the cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. The oral surgeon performed a sequestrectomy under local anesthesia and antibiotic prophylaxis; a histological examination confirmed the hypothesis of medication-related osteonecrosis. The patient currently undergoes follow-up visits monthly; the combination of photobiomodulation therapy and cycles of antibiotics keeps the necrotic lesion steady, and the oncological therapy prevents the growth of the cutaneous squamous cell cancer. Conclusions: The current case supports the need for histological examination to resolve the diagnostic challenge of mandibular exposed necrotic bone and to differentiate among osteoradionecrosis, stage-III medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws, and intraoral localization of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Full article

Background/Objectives: Head and neck cancer is one of the most common cancers globally, with high mortality and significant treatment-related side effects. Conventional therapies, including surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, have improved survival but often have serious consequences for patients’ quality of life. For this reason, there is growing interest in complementary therapies such as acupuncture, herbal medicine, cannabinoids, traditional Chinese medicine, and mind-body therapies. Methods: This review was conducted through a systematic analysis of the scientific literature available on PubMed and Scopus, selecting studies about the use of alternative therapies in patients with head and neck cancer according to strict criteria. Results: Acupuncture has shown benefits in the management of xerostomia and dysphagia, while some herbal medicines have shown potential anticancer effects, although with limitations related to bioavailability. Vitamins and antioxidants showed mixed results: some studies suggest a protective effect, while others report a possible increased risk of cancer progression. Cannabinoids are a controversial topic, with possible palliative benefits but also a higher risk of head and neck cancer. Traditional Chinese medicine and mind-body therapies, such as yoga, have shown positive effects on patients’ well-being, although their direct impact on cancer progression remains uncertain. Conclusions: Alternative therapies could be a useful support in managing symptoms and improving the quality of life patients with head and neck cancer. However, solid scientific evidence on their effectiveness and safety is still lacking. Rigorous clinical studies are needed to assess their therapeutic potential and define a safe integration into multidisciplinary cancer management. Full article

Background: Photobiomodulation (PBM) therapy has shown potential in managing oral mucositis (OM), a frequent and painful side effect of radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy in head and neck cancer patients. Although PBM is increasingly used in clinical settings, the optimal delivery method—transcutaneous or intraoral—remains undetermined. Methods: This prospective, single-center, randomized pilot study (clinicaltrials.gov NCT06458517) aims to compare the efficacy of transcutaneous versus intraoral PBM in preventing and managing OM in patients undergoing radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for cancers of the oral cavity or oropharynx. Participants will be randomized into two groups: one receiving intraoral PBM with the CareMin650™ device, and the other receiving transcutaneous PBM with the ATP38^® device. Results: Primary and secondary outcomes will include the incidence and severity of OM, treatment interruptions, patient-reported pain levels, and quality of life, assessed using validated tools. Conclusions: This study will provide comparative data on two PBM modalities, contributing to the development of standardized PBM protocols in supportive oncology care and informing future multicenter trials aimed at improving patient outcomes during radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. Full article

Background: Squamoid eccrine ductal carcinoma (SEDC) is an exceedingly rare and aggressive cutaneous adnexal malignancy, with fewer than 100 reported cases. Its histopathologic overlap with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) frequently leads to misdiagnosis, delaying appropriate management. Unlike SCC, SEDC exhibits biphasic differentiation, deep infiltration, and a high rate of perineural invasion, contributing to significant morbidity and poor long-term outcomes. Given the absence of standardized treatment protocols, managing SEDC remains a challenge. Case Presentation: We report an unusual case of an 80-year-old female presenting with progressive numbness, nasal deviation, and a subcutaneous indurated lesion in the left nasofacial region. The early neurological symptoms were an atypical feature, suggesting perineural invasion (PNI) before visible tumor progression. Initial histopathologic evaluation was inconclusive, raising suspicion of SCC, necessitating immunohistochemical analysis, which confirmed ductal differentiation, leading to the final diagnosis of SEDC. The patient underwent radical resection with intraoperative margin assessment (Mohs micrographic surgery; MMS) followed by adjuvant radiotherapy (62 Gy/31 fractions) due to high-risk features, including perineural and perivascular invasion. Despite initial disease control, a local recurrence involving the left orbit and nasal bone occurred 20 months postoperatively, demonstrating the aggressive nature of SEDC despite clear surgical margins and adjuvant therapy. Due to disease progression and refusal of further surgery, only palliative care was provided. During follow-up, the patient contracted COVID-19, further complicating her clinical status and contributing to her demise. While COVID-19 was not directly linked to SEDC progression, its impact on patient management was significant. Conclusions: This case underscores the diagnostic and therapeutic challenges of SEDC, emphasizing the need for early suspicion, extensive histopathologic assessment, and aggressive multimodal treatment. The importance of multidisciplinary management—particularly in elderly and immunocompromised patients—and long-term surveillance due to high recurrence risk and PNI is crucial. Full article