Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (10)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = motor cortex stimulation (MCS)

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
11 pages, 379 KB  
Article
Preoperative Suffering of Patients with Central Neuropathic Pain and Their Expectations Prior to Motor Cortex Stimulation: A Qualitative Study
by Erkan Kurt, Richard Witkam, Robert van Dongen, Kris Vissers, Yvonne Engels and Dylan Henssen
Healthcare 2025, 13(15), 1900; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13151900 - 4 Aug 2025
Viewed by 511
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to improve the understanding of the lives of patients with chronic neuropathic pain planned for invasive motor cortex stimulation (iMCS) and assess their expectations towards this intervention and its impact. Methods: Semi-structured face-to-face interviews were conducted until [...] Read more.
Objective: This study aimed to improve the understanding of the lives of patients with chronic neuropathic pain planned for invasive motor cortex stimulation (iMCS) and assess their expectations towards this intervention and its impact. Methods: Semi-structured face-to-face interviews were conducted until saturation of data was reached. Patients were recruited from one university medical center in the Netherlands. All interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and subjected to thematic analysis using iterative and inductive coding by two researchers independently. Results: Fifteen patients were included (11 females; mean age 63 ± 9.4 yrs). Analysis of the coded interviews revealed seven themes: (1) the consequences of living with chronic neuropathic pain; (2) loss of autonomy and performing usual activities; (3) balancing energy and mood; (4) intimacy; (5) feeling understood and accepted; (6) meaning of life; and (7) the expectations of iMCS treatment. Conclusions: This is the first qualitative study that describes the suffering of patients with chronic neuropathic pain, and their expectations prior to invasive brain stimulation. Significant themes in the lives of patients with chronic pain have been brought to light. The findings strengthen communication between physicians, caregivers, and patients. Practice Implications: The insights gathered from the interviews create a structured framework for comprehending the values and expectations of patients living with central pain and reveal the impact of symptoms due to the central pain. This knowledge improves the communication between physicians and caregivers on one side and the patient on the other side. Furthermore, the framework enhances the capacity for shared decision-making, particularly in managing expectations related to iMCS. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pain Management Practice and Research)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 788 KB  
Article
Cognitive Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Plus Robotic Verticalization in Minimally Conscious State
by Antonio Gangemi, Rosaria De Luca, Rosa Angela Fabio, Mirjam Bonanno, Davide Cardile, Maria Randazzo Mignacca, Carmela Rifici, Francesco Corallo, Angelo Quartarone, Federica Impellizzeri and Rocco Salvatore Calabrò
Biomedicines 2024, 12(10), 2244; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12102244 - 2 Oct 2024
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 1950
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive therapeutic method that modulates cortical excitability and shows promising results for treating disorders of consciousness (DoCs). Robotic verticalization training (RVT) has been shown to enhance motor and cognitive recovery. This study evaluates [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive therapeutic method that modulates cortical excitability and shows promising results for treating disorders of consciousness (DoCs). Robotic verticalization training (RVT) has been shown to enhance motor and cognitive recovery. This study evaluates the effects of an innovative approach combining RVT with tDCS in individuals with DoCs. Methods: Twenty-four subjects with DoCs, particularly those with chronic minimally conscious state (MCS) due to vascular or traumatic brain injury, participated in a quasi-randomized study at the Neurorehabilitation Unit, IRCCS Neurolesi (Messina, Italy). Participants were divided into either a control group (CG) receiving RVT alone or an experimental group (EG) receiving combined tDCS and RVT. Both groups underwent treatments five times weekly for four weeks, with tDCS/sham sessions over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) lasting 20 min before Erigo training sessions, which lasted 45 min. Results: The findings indicate that combining tDCS with Erigo® Pro RTT could lead to greater improvements in cognitive functioning and P300 latency compared to the CG. Conclusions: These results suggest that the integrated approach of tDCS with RVT could offer significant benefits for patients with MCS, highlighting its potential to enhance cognitive recovery, such as reducing P300 latency. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1096 KB  
Review
Advancements in Modern Treatment Approaches for Central Post-Stroke Pain: A Narrative Review
by Auste Asadauskas, Andrea Stieger, Markus M. Luedi and Lukas Andereggen
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(18), 5377; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13185377 - 11 Sep 2024
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 7190
Abstract
Purpose of Review: Central post-stroke pain (CPSP) poses a multifaceted challenge in medical practice, necessitating a thorough and multidisciplinary approach for its diagnosis and treatment. This review examines current methods for addressing CPSP, highlighting both pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapies. It covers the mechanisms [...] Read more.
Purpose of Review: Central post-stroke pain (CPSP) poses a multifaceted challenge in medical practice, necessitating a thorough and multidisciplinary approach for its diagnosis and treatment. This review examines current methods for addressing CPSP, highlighting both pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapies. It covers the mechanisms and clinical effectiveness of these treatments in managing CPSP and emphasizes the importance of personalized treatment plans, given the varied causes of CPSP. Recent Findings: Recent advancements have illuminated diverse treatment modalities for CPSP. Pharmacotherapy spans from conventional analgesics to anticonvulsants and antidepressants, tailored to mitigate the neuropathic characteristics of CPSP. Non-pharmacological interventions, including physical therapy and psychological strategies, are pivotal in managing CPSP’s chronic nature. For cases resistant to standard treatments, advanced interventions such as nerve blocks and surgical procedures like deep brain stimulation (DBS) or motor cortex stimulation (MCS) are considered. Additionally, innovative technologies such as neuromodulation techniques and personalized medicine are emerging as promising avenues to enhance therapeutic outcomes and improve quality of life for individuals grappling with CPSP. Summary: Modern approaches in managing CPSP require an interdisciplinary and patient-centric approach. Customizing treatment plans to address the specific etiology and symptoms of CPSP is crucial. Pharmacotherapy remains fundamental, encompassing medications such as anticonvulsants and antidepressants tailored to manage neuropathic pain. Integrating non-pharmacological interventions is crucial for providing comprehensive care. Additionally, investigating innovative technologies and personalized medicine presents promising opportunities to enhance treatment results and elevate the quality of life for those suffering from CPSP. Ultimately, an integrated approach that acknowledges the multifaceted nature of CPSP is essential for effective management and patient well-being. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Anesthesiology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 511 KB  
Article
Modulation of Corticospinal Excitability during Action Observation in Patients with Disorders of Consciousness
by Mauro Mancuso, Lucia Mencarelli, Laura Abbruzzese, Benedetta Basagni, Pierluigi Zoccolotti, Cristiano Scarselli, Simone Capitani, Francesco Neri, Emiliano Santarnecchi and Simone Rossi
Brain Sci. 2024, 14(4), 371; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci14040371 - 11 Apr 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2014
Abstract
Brain imaging studies have recently provided some evidence in favor of covert cognitive processes that are ongoing in patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC) (e.g., a minimally conscious state and vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome) when engaged in passive sensory stimulation or active tasks [...] Read more.
Brain imaging studies have recently provided some evidence in favor of covert cognitive processes that are ongoing in patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC) (e.g., a minimally conscious state and vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome) when engaged in passive sensory stimulation or active tasks such as motor imagery. In this exploratory study, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the motor cortex to assess modulations of corticospinal excitability induced by action observation in eleven patients with DoC. Action observation is known to facilitate corticospinal excitability in healthy subjects, unveiling how the observer’s motor system maps others’ actions onto her/his motor repertoire. Additional stimuli were non-biological motion and acoustic startle stimuli, considering that sudden and loud acoustic stimulation is known to lower corticospinal excitability in healthy subjects. The results indicate that some form of motor resonance is spared in a subset of patients with DoC, with some significant difference between biological and non-biological motion stimuli. However, there was no covariation between corticospinal excitability and the type of DoC diagnosis (i.e., whether diagnosed with VS/UWS or MCS). Similarly, no covariation was detected with clinical changes between admission and discharge in clinical outcome measures. Both motor resonance and the difference between the resonance with biological/non-biological motion discrimination correlated with the amplitude of the N20 somatosensory evoked potentials, following the stimulation of the median nerve at the wrist (i.e., the temporal marker signaling the activation of the contralateral primary somatosensory cortex). Moreover, the startle-evoking stimulus produced an anomalous increase in corticospinal excitability, suggesting a functional dissociation between cortical and subcortical circuits in patients with DoC. Further work is needed to better comprehend the conditions in which corticospinal facilitation occurs and whether and how they may relate to individual clinical parameters. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue State of the Art in Disorders of Consciousness)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1002 KB  
Article
Anti-Inflammatory and Cortical Responses after Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Disorders of Consciousness: An Exploratory Study
by Sofia Straudi, Annibale Antonioni, Andrea Baroni, Valentina Bonsangue, Susanna Lavezzi, Giacomo Koch, Veronica Tisato, Nicole Ziliotto, Nino Basaglia, Paola Secchiero, Fabio Manfredini and Nicola Lamberti
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(1), 108; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13010108 - 24 Dec 2023
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 3044
Abstract
Disorders of consciousness (DoC) due to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) are associated with severe disability and an alteration of cortical activation, angiogenesis, and inflammation, which are crucial elements for behavioural recovery. This exploratory study aimed to evaluate anti-inflammatory and cortical responses after [...] Read more.
Disorders of consciousness (DoC) due to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) are associated with severe disability and an alteration of cortical activation, angiogenesis, and inflammation, which are crucial elements for behavioural recovery. This exploratory study aimed to evaluate anti-inflammatory and cortical responses after transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in traumatic prolonged disorders of consciousness. Ten minimally conscious state (MCS) patients underwent ten sessions of anodal tDCS (five sessions/week, two weeks, 40 min/session) on the primary motor cortex bilaterally. Clinical evaluations were performed using the Coma Recovery Scale–Revised (CRS-R) pre- and post-treatment. In contrast, after single and multiple tDCS sessions, the haemodynamic cortical response was obtained with functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). Moreover, angiogenesis (angiopoietin-2, BMP9, endoglin, HbEFG, HGF, IL8, Leptin, PLGF, VEGF-A, and VEGF-C) and inflammation (GM-CSF, IFNg, IP10, MCP1, and TNFα) circulating biomarkers were collected. A significant haemodynamic response was observed after a single tDCS session, with an increased activation from 4.4 (3.1–6.1) to 7.6 (2.9–15.7) a.u. (p = 0.035). After ten tDCS sessions, a significant reduction of angiopoietin-2, VEGF-C, and IP-10 was detected. Moreover, a correlation between behavioural (CRS-R), TNFα (r = 0.89; p = 0.007), and IP10 (r = 0.81; p = 0.014) variation was found. In conclusion, a single tDCS session can increase the cortical activation in MCS patients. Moreover, multiple tDCS sessions showed an anti-inflammatory effect related to behavioural improvement. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Clinical Rehabilitation)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

18 pages, 2121 KB  
Article
Systemic and Peripheral Mechanisms of Cortical Stimulation-Induced Analgesia and Refractoriness in a Rat Model of Neuropathic Pain
by Danielle V. Assis, Ana Carolina P. Campos, Amanda F. N. Paschoa, Talita F. Santos, Erich T. Fonoff and Rosana L. Pagano
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(9), 7796; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24097796 - 25 Apr 2023
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2670
Abstract
Epidural motor cortex stimulation (MCS) is an effective treatment for refractory neuropathic pain; however, some individuals are unresponsive. In this study, we correlated the effectiveness of MCS and refractoriness with the expression of cytokines, neurotrophins, and nociceptive mediators in the dorsal root ganglion [...] Read more.
Epidural motor cortex stimulation (MCS) is an effective treatment for refractory neuropathic pain; however, some individuals are unresponsive. In this study, we correlated the effectiveness of MCS and refractoriness with the expression of cytokines, neurotrophins, and nociceptive mediators in the dorsal root ganglion (DRG), sciatic nerve, and plasma of rats with sciatic neuropathy. MCS inhibited hyperalgesia and allodynia in two-thirds of the animals (responsive group), and one-third did not respond (refractory group). Chronic constriction injury (CCI) increased IL-1β in the nerve and DRG, inhibited IL-4, IL-10, and IL-17A in the nerve, decreased β-endorphin, and enhanced substance P in the plasma, compared to the control. Responsive animals showed decreased NGF and increased IL-6 in the nerve, accompanied by restoration of local IL-10 and IL-17A and systemic β-endorphin. Refractory animals showed increased TNF-α and decreased IFNγ in the nerve, along with decreased TNF-α and IL-17A in the DRG, maintaining low levels of systemic β-endorphin. Our findings suggest that the effectiveness of MCS depends on local control of inflammatory and neurotrophic changes, accompanied by recovery of the opioidergic system observed in neuropathic conditions. So, understanding the refractoriness to MCS may guide an improvement in the efficacy of the technique, thus benefiting patients with persistent neuropathic pain. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Neurodegenerative Diseases Research and Therapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 653 KB  
Article
Development of a Clinical Prediction Rule for Treatment Success with Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Knee Osteoarthritis Pain: A Secondary Analysis of a Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
by Paulo E. P. Teixeira, Daniela R. B. Tavares, Kevin Pacheco-Barrios, Luis Castelo Branco, Eric Slawka, Julie Keysor, Virginia F. M. Trevisani, Doug K Gross and Felipe Fregni
Biomedicines 2023, 11(1), 4; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11010004 - 20 Dec 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2777
Abstract
The study’s objective was to develop a clinical prediction rule that predicts a clinically significant analgesic effect on chronic knee osteoarthritis pain after transcranial direct current stimulation treatment. This is a secondary analysis from a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Data from 51 individuals [...] Read more.
The study’s objective was to develop a clinical prediction rule that predicts a clinically significant analgesic effect on chronic knee osteoarthritis pain after transcranial direct current stimulation treatment. This is a secondary analysis from a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Data from 51 individuals with chronic knee osteoarthritis pain and an impaired descending pain inhibitory system were used. The intervention comprised a 15-session protocol of anodal primary motor cortex transcranial direct current stimulation. Treatment success was defined by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities’ Osteoarthritis Index pain subscale. Accuracy statistics were calculated for each potential predictor and for the final model. The final logistic regression model was statistically significant (p < 0.01) and comprised five physical and psychosocial predictor variables that together yielded a positive likelihood ratio of 14.40 (95% CI: 3.66–56.69) and an 85% (95%CI: 60–96%) post-test probability of success. This is the first clinical prediction rule proposed for transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with chronic pain. The model underscores the importance of both physical and psychosocial factors as predictors of the analgesic response to transcranial direct current stimulation treatment. Validation of the proposed clinical prediction rule should be performed in other datasets. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Neuromodulation from Theory to Therapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

41 pages, 7627 KB  
Review
Neurosurgical Treatment of Pain
by Rafael G. Sola and Paloma Pulido
Brain Sci. 2022, 12(11), 1584; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12111584 - 20 Nov 2022
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 5300
Abstract
The aim of this review is to draw attention to neurosurgical approaches for treating chronic and opioid-resistant pain. In a first chapter, an up-to-date overview of the main pathophysiological mechanisms of pain has been carried out, with special emphasis on the details in [...] Read more.
The aim of this review is to draw attention to neurosurgical approaches for treating chronic and opioid-resistant pain. In a first chapter, an up-to-date overview of the main pathophysiological mechanisms of pain has been carried out, with special emphasis on the details in which the surgical treatment is based. In a second part, the principal indications and results of different surgical approaches are reviewed. Cordotomy, Myelotomy, DREZ lesions, Trigeminal Nucleotomy, Mesencephalotomy, and Cingulotomy are revisited. Ablative procedures have a limited role in the management of chronic non-cancer pain, but they continues to help patients with refractory cancer-related pain. Another ablation lesion has been named and excluded, due to lack of current relevance. Peripheral Nerve, Spine Cord, and the principal possibilities of Deep Brain and Motor Cortex Stimulation are also revisited. Regarding electrical neuromodulation, patient selection remains a challenge. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Sensory and Motor Neuroscience)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 4747 KB  
Article
Motor Cortex Stimulation Reversed Hypernociception, Increased Serotonin in Raphe Neurons, and Caused Inhibition of Spinal Astrocytes in a Parkinson’s Disease Rat Model
by Ana Carolina P. Campos, Miriã B. Berzuíno, Gabriela R. Barbosa, Helena M. R. C. Freire, Patricia S. Lopes, Danielle V. Assis, Erich T. Fonoff and Rosana L. Pagano
Cells 2021, 10(5), 1158; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10051158 - 11 May 2021
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 4268
Abstract
Persistent pain is a prevalent symptom of Parkinson’s disease (PD), which is related to the loss of monoamines and neuroinflammation. Motor cortex stimulation (MCS) inhibits persistent pain by activating the descending analgesic pathways; however, its effectiveness in the control of PD-induced pain remains [...] Read more.
Persistent pain is a prevalent symptom of Parkinson’s disease (PD), which is related to the loss of monoamines and neuroinflammation. Motor cortex stimulation (MCS) inhibits persistent pain by activating the descending analgesic pathways; however, its effectiveness in the control of PD-induced pain remains unclear. Here, we evaluated the analgesic efficacy of MCS together with serotonergic and spinal glial modulation in an experimental PD (ePD) rat model. Wistar rats with unilateral striatal 6-OHDA and MCS were assessed for behavioral immobility and nociceptive responses. The immunoreactivity of dopamine in the substantia nigra and serotonin in the nucleus raphe magnus (NRM) and the neuronal, astrocytic, and microglial activation in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord were evaluated. MCS, without interfering with dopamine loss, reversed ePD-induced immobility and hypernociception. This response was accompanied by an exacerbated increase in serotonin in the NRM and a decrease in neuronal and astrocytic hyperactivation in the spinal cord, without inhibiting ePD-induced microglial hypertrophy and hyperplasia. Taken together, MCS induces analgesia in the ePD model, while restores the descending serotonergic pathway with consequent inhibition of spinal neurons and astrocytes, showing the role of MCS in PD-induced pain control. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms of Parkinson's Disease)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 550 KB  
Review
Surgical Neurostimulation for Spinal Cord Injury
by Aswin Chari, Ian D. Hentall, Marios C. Papadopoulos and Erlick A. C. Pereira
Brain Sci. 2017, 7(2), 18; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci7020018 - 10 Feb 2017
Cited by 49 | Viewed by 9705
Abstract
Traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) is a devastating neurological condition characterized by a constellation of symptoms including paralysis, paraesthesia, pain, cardiovascular, bladder, bowel and sexual dysfunction. Current treatment for SCI involves acute resuscitation, aggressive rehabilitation and symptomatic treatment for complications. Despite the progress [...] Read more.
Traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) is a devastating neurological condition characterized by a constellation of symptoms including paralysis, paraesthesia, pain, cardiovascular, bladder, bowel and sexual dysfunction. Current treatment for SCI involves acute resuscitation, aggressive rehabilitation and symptomatic treatment for complications. Despite the progress in scientific understanding, regenerative therapies are lacking. In this review, we outline the current state and future potential of invasive and non-invasive neuromodulation strategies including deep brain stimulation (DBS), spinal cord stimulation (SCS), motor cortex stimulation (MCS), transcutaneous direct current stimulation (tDCS) and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in the context of SCI. We consider the ability of these therapies to address pain, sensorimotor symptoms and autonomic dysregulation associated with SCI. In addition to the potential to make important contributions to SCI treatment, neuromodulation has the added ability to contribute to our understanding of spinal cord neurobiology and the pathophysiology of SCI. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) Applications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop