Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (46)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = migraine prophylaxis

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
14 pages, 286 KB  
Hypothesis
Botulinum Toxin-A, Generating a Hypothesis for Orofacial Pain Therapy
by Yair Sharav, Rafael Benoliel and Yaron Haviv
Toxins 2025, 17(8), 389; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins17080389 - 4 Aug 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2743
Abstract
Orofacial pain encompasses a spectrum of disorders ranging from musculoskeletal disorders, such as myofascial pain, and temporomandibular disorders to neuropathic situations, such as trigeminal neuralgia and painful post-traumatic trigeminal neuropathy, and neurovascular pain such as orofacial migraine and cluster orofacial pain. Each require [...] Read more.
Orofacial pain encompasses a spectrum of disorders ranging from musculoskeletal disorders, such as myofascial pain, and temporomandibular disorders to neuropathic situations, such as trigeminal neuralgia and painful post-traumatic trigeminal neuropathy, and neurovascular pain such as orofacial migraine and cluster orofacial pain. Each require tailored prophylactic pharmacotherapy, such as carbamazepine, gabapentin, pregabalin, amitriptyline, metoprolol, and topiramate. Yet a substantial subset of patients remains refractory. Botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) has demonstrated growing efficacy in the treatment of multiple forms of orofacial pain, which covers the whole range of these disorders. We describe the analgesic properties of BoNT-A for each of the three following orofacial pain disorders: neuropathic, myofascial, and neurovascular. Then, we conclude with a section on the neuromodulatory mechanisms of BoNT-A. This lays the basis for the generation of a hypothesis for the segmental therapeutic action of BoNT-A on the whole range of orofacial pain disorders. In addition, the advantage of BoNT-A for providing a safe sustained effect after a single application for chronic pain prophylaxis is discussed, as opposed to the daily use of current conventional prophylactic medications. Finally, we summarize the clinical applications of BoNT-A for chronic orofacial pain therapy. Full article
12 pages, 1312 KB  
Systematic Review
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Episodic Migraine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
by Faraidoon Haghdoost, Abdul Salam, Fatemeh Zahra Seyed-Kolbadi, Deepika Padala, Candice Delcourt and Anthony Rodgers
Med. Sci. 2025, 13(3), 84; https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci13030084 - 26 Jun 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2205
Abstract
Background: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation technique for migraine prevention. This study evaluates the efficacy of tDCS compared to sham in preventing episodic migraine in adults. Methods: PubMed and Embase databases were searched until May 2025 to identify randomized [...] Read more.
Background: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation technique for migraine prevention. This study evaluates the efficacy of tDCS compared to sham in preventing episodic migraine in adults. Methods: PubMed and Embase databases were searched until May 2025 to identify randomized controlled trials comparing tDCS with sham for the prevention of episodic migraine in adults. Risk of bias in the included trials was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool version 2. A random effect meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the effects of cathodal and anodal tDCS on migraine frequency (days per month and attacks per month). Results: The meta-analysis included six trials with 172 participants (mean age 34 years, 82% females). Both cathodal (three studies, over the occipital area) and anodal (three studies, over the occipital or primary motor area) tDCS reduced the mean number of monthly migraine days and migraine attacks compared to sham. After pooling the outcomes and excluding two studies at high risk of bias, anodal tDCS over the occipital or primary motor area (standardized difference in means = −0.7, 95% CI: −1.7, 0.2, p = 0.124) and cathodal tDCS over the occipital area (standardized difference in means = −0.7, 95% CI: −1.1, −0.3, p = 0.000) reduced headache frequency compared to sham. However, the reduction with anodal tDCS was not statistically significant. Summary: tDCS may be effective in preventing episodic migraine. However, the evidence is limited by the small number of heterogeneous trials, with variation in electrode placement and stimulation intervals. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Neurosciences)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 604 KB  
Article
Still Relevant, Still Effective: A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study on Real-Life Use of Flunarizine in Episodic Migraine
by Devrimsel Harika Ertem, Faik Ilik and Mustafa Kemal Ilik
Brain Sci. 2025, 15(6), 545; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15060545 - 22 May 2025
Viewed by 3793
Abstract
Aim: New disease-specific and mechanism-based treatments for migraine that share good evidence of efficacy have recently been introduced. However, due to reimbursement problems with insurance companies and high costs, classical anti-migraine drugs continue to be used. The objective of this study was to [...] Read more.
Aim: New disease-specific and mechanism-based treatments for migraine that share good evidence of efficacy have recently been introduced. However, due to reimbursement problems with insurance companies and high costs, classical anti-migraine drugs continue to be used. The objective of this study was to assess the clinical efficacy and tolerability of flunarizine for the preventive treatment of episodic migraine without aura in a Turkish cohort, concentrating on alterations in headache frequency, pain intensity, and migraine-related disability as measured by MIDAS scores within a practical clinical environment. Methods: Clinical and demographic data of 243 patients with episodic migraine without aura (175 females, 68 males; mean age 33.9 years) were evaluated. Headache frequency, side effects of flunarizine, pain intensity, and MIDAS scores were recorded during initial and 3-month follow-up periods. Results: After three months of flunarizine treatment, significant improvements were observed in headache parameters. The mean Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) score, the mean MIDAS score, and the monthly migraine attack frequency declined significantly (all p values < 0.001). Adverse events were reported in 21.8% of patients, most commonly weight gain and tiredness, followed by mood changes, gastrointestinal symptoms, and numbness or tingling. Patients experiencing side effects were significantly older (p = 0.023), though side effects did not impact treatment efficacy. Regression analysis identified no significant predictors of disability improvement. Conclusion: Our results demonstrated that flunarizine had considerable short-term efficacy in decreasing the frequency of migraine attacks, alleviating headache severity, and reducing migraine-related disability among patients experiencing episodic migraine without aura. Although mild to moderate side effects were fairly prevalent, especially in older individuals, they did not compromise the effectiveness of the treatment. Notably, early adverse events occurring within the first two weeks resulted in treatment discontinuation for some patients, highlighting the necessity for vigilant monitoring during the initial phase of treatment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Sensory and Motor Neuroscience)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

18 pages, 2856 KB  
Article
The Influence of Topiramate on Morphine Dependence in Mice
by Adrian Pysiewicz, Antonina Mazur, Jolanta Kotlińska, Irena Baranowska-Bosiacka, Krzysztof Fronc, Małgorzata Łupina, Marta Kruk-Słomka and Joanna Listos
Biomolecules 2025, 15(5), 730; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom15050730 - 16 May 2025
Viewed by 1420
Abstract
Topiramate evokes pharmacological activity via a blockade of voltage-dependent sodium channels, reduction in glutamate release, inhibition of AMPA receptors and kainate receptors, and potentiation of GABAergic neurotransmission. Therefore, it is used not only as an antiseizure drug but is also effective in migraine [...] Read more.
Topiramate evokes pharmacological activity via a blockade of voltage-dependent sodium channels, reduction in glutamate release, inhibition of AMPA receptors and kainate receptors, and potentiation of GABAergic neurotransmission. Therefore, it is used not only as an antiseizure drug but is also effective in migraine prophylaxis, cluster headaches, neuropathic pain, and alcohol dependence. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of topiramate in morphine dependence in mice, particularly in terms of morphine tolerance, morphine withdrawal signs, and morphine sensitization. In these experiments, topiramate was administered both acutely and chronically. Topiramate significantly reduced the morphine tolerance in the hot-plate test and attenuated naloxone-induced morphine withdrawal signs. Its effect on morphine sensitization to the locomotor activity of mice was poor. The obtained results showed that topiramate might be an effective drug for reducing the physical symptoms of morphine dependence. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 465 KB  
Article
The Long-Term Treatment of Drug-Resistant Migraine with the Modified Atkins Ketogenic Diet: A Single-Center, Retrospective Study
by Francesco Francini-Pesenti, Silvia Favaretto, Matteo D’Angelo, Martina Cacciapuoti and Lorenzo A Calò
Nutrients 2024, 16(24), 4324; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16244324 - 15 Dec 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 5043
Abstract
Despite advances in pharmacological therapies, migraine patients are often drug resistant. Further therapeutic options in this field are, therefore, desirable. Recent studies have highlighted the efficacy of ketogenic diet (KD) on improving migraine, but data on their long-term efficacy and safety are lacking. [...] Read more.
Despite advances in pharmacological therapies, migraine patients are often drug resistant. Further therapeutic options in this field are, therefore, desirable. Recent studies have highlighted the efficacy of ketogenic diet (KD) on improving migraine, but data on their long-term efficacy and safety are lacking. In this study, we retrospectively evaluated the long-term effectiveness of the modified Atkins ketogenic diet (MAD) in episodic or chronic drug-resistant migraine patients. 52 patients diagnosed with episodic or chronic drug-resistant migraine under modified Atkins ketogenic diet (MAD) were evaluated. In total, 41 patients followed the diet for 6 months and 33 for 12 months. After both 6 and 12 months, frequency, length, and intensity of migraine episodes, as well as the number of medications significantly decreased with respect to the start of the diet. Body mass index, high sensitivity PCR, diastolic blood pressure, fasting plasma insulin and HOMA index were also significantly reduced both after 6 and 12 months. No major metabolic changes were observed during MAD treatment. In conclusion, KD has been shown to be effective and safe in the long-term treatment of drug-resistant migraine. A high dropout rate still remains an important factor, which often limits its use. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nutrients: 15th Anniversary)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 3757 KB  
Article
Efficacy and Tolerability of Erenumab and Topiramate for Prevention of Chronic Migraine: A Retrospective Cohort Study
by Eslam El Nebrisi, Zainaba Suaad Ahmed Ruwayya, Dalya Ibrahim Alzayori, Ranya Ibrahim Alzayori, Shyam Babu Chandran and Mohamed Elshafei
Medicina 2024, 60(10), 1684; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60101684 - 14 Oct 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 7034
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Migraine is a chronic neurological disorder affecting approximately 14% of the global population. Beyond physical pain, migraines significantly impact individuals’ quality of life, influencing education, employment, and income levels. Topiramate, a second-generation antiepileptic medication, has demonstrated notable efficacy in reducing the [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Migraine is a chronic neurological disorder affecting approximately 14% of the global population. Beyond physical pain, migraines significantly impact individuals’ quality of life, influencing education, employment, and income levels. Topiramate, a second-generation antiepileptic medication, has demonstrated notable efficacy in reducing the occurrence of chronic migraine. Over the past three decades, extensive research has implicated the neuropeptide calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) in migraine pathogenesis. Erenumab, the first FDA-approved CGRP inhibitor, received approval in 2018. This study aims to compare the clinical efficacy of Erenumab and Topiramate for migraine prevention. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults with episodic or chronic migraine over a 12-month period, comparing Erenumab (n = 52) and Topiramate (n = 56). Outcomes assessed included changes in the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) scores from baseline over the last three months of treatment and the proportion of patients achieving a ≥50% reduction in MIDAS scores by the end of the study. Results: The Erenumab group showed significant improvement, with nearly 79% of patients achieving a 50% reduction in their MIDAS score, with a mean reduction of 3.76. Notably, only two patients (3.8.5) discontinued treatment due to adverse events. In contrast, the Topiramate group had over 15% of patients achieve a 50% reduction in MIDAS scores, with a mean reduction of 5.89, and a had discontinuation rate of 14.2% due to adverse events. Conclusions: Both Topiramate and Erenumab are effective for migraine prevention. However, Topiramate has lower tolerability and more side effects, while Erenumab offers better tolerability and safety at a higher cost. Treatment decisions should be individualized based on patient needs, efficacy, safety, and cost considerations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Pharmacology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 307 KB  
Review
Non-Migraine Head Pain and Botulinum Toxin
by Fatemeh Farham, Dilara Onan and Paolo Martelletti
Toxins 2024, 16(10), 431; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins16100431 - 9 Oct 2024
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 6080
Abstract
Botulinum toxin A (BT-A), a potential neurotoxin produced by the bacterium Clostridium botulinum, is known for its ability to prevent the release of acetylcholine at the neuromuscular synapse, leading to temporary muscle paralysis. BT-A is used for a wide range of therapeutic applications. [...] Read more.
Botulinum toxin A (BT-A), a potential neurotoxin produced by the bacterium Clostridium botulinum, is known for its ability to prevent the release of acetylcholine at the neuromuscular synapse, leading to temporary muscle paralysis. BT-A is used for a wide range of therapeutic applications. Several studies have shown mechanisms beyond the inhibition of acetylcholine release for pain control. BT-A inhibits the release of neurotransmitters associated with pain and inflammation, such as glutamate, CGRP, and substance P. Additionally, it would be effective in nerve entrapment leading to neuronal hypersensitivity, which is known as a new pathogenesis of painful conditions. BT-A has been applied to the treatment of a wide variety of neurological disorders. Since 2010, BT-A application has been approved and widely used as a chronic migraine prophylaxis. Moreover, due to its effects on pain through sensory modulation, it may also be effective for other headaches. Several studies using BT-A, at different doses and administration sites for headaches, have shown beneficial effects on frequency and severity. In this review, we provide an overview of using BT-A to treat primary and secondary headache disorders. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Bacterial Toxins)
8 pages, 236 KB  
Review
Onabotulinumtoxin A for the Treatment of Post-Traumatic Headache: Is It Better than Anti-CGRP Antibodies?
by Lanfranco Pellesi, Dilara Onan and Paolo Martelletti
Toxins 2024, 16(10), 427; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins16100427 - 2 Oct 2024
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 3733
Abstract
Post-traumatic headache (PTH) is a common and debilitating consequence of traumatic brain injury (TBI), often resembling migraine and tension-type headaches. Despite its prevalence, the optimal treatment for PTH remains unclear, with current strategies largely extrapolated from other headache disorders. This review evaluates the [...] Read more.
Post-traumatic headache (PTH) is a common and debilitating consequence of traumatic brain injury (TBI), often resembling migraine and tension-type headaches. Despite its prevalence, the optimal treatment for PTH remains unclear, with current strategies largely extrapolated from other headache disorders. This review evaluates the use of onabotulinumtoxin A (ONA) and anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) in the treatment of PTH. A comprehensive literature search was conducted on PubMed, including studies published up to September 2024, focusing on the efficacy, safety, and mechanisms of onabotulinumtoxin A and anti-CGRP mAbs in PTH. Both clinical trials and observational studies were reviewed. ONA, widely recognized for its efficacy in chronic migraine, has shown limited benefits in PTH with only one trial involving abobotulinumtoxin A in a cohort of 40 subjects. A phase 2 trial with fremanezumab, an anti-CGRP monoclonal antibody, failed to demonstrate significant efficacy in PTH, raising questions about the utility of targeting CGRP in this condition. ONA may offer advantages over anti-CGRP mAbs, not only in terms of its broader mechanism of action but also in cost-effectiveness and higher patient adherence. Both ONA and anti-CGRP mAbs are potential options for the management of PTH, but the current evidence is insufficient to establish clear guidelines. The negative results from the fremanezumab trial suggest that CGRP inhibition may not be sufficient for treating PTH, whereas onabotulinumtoxin A’s ability to target multiple pain pathways may make it a more promising candidate. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Immunogenicity of Botulinum Toxin)
11 pages, 253 KB  
Article
Efficacy of Desvenlafaxine in Reducing Migraine Frequency and Severity: A Retrospective Study
by Marina Stoupa Hadidi, Murad Rasheed, Yanal M. Bisharat, Heba H. Al Helou, Hussam A. El Aina, Hala M. Batayneh, Alaa A. A. Aljabali and Omar Gammoh
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(17), 5156; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13175156 - 30 Aug 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 4875
Abstract
Background: Migraine is characterized by sudden acute episodes of pain, with a global prevalence of 18% among all age groups. It is the second leading cause of years lived with disability worldwide. Prophylactic treatment is important in managing migraine; however, its efficacy and [...] Read more.
Background: Migraine is characterized by sudden acute episodes of pain, with a global prevalence of 18% among all age groups. It is the second leading cause of years lived with disability worldwide. Prophylactic treatment is important in managing migraine; however, its efficacy and safety are debated. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of desvenlafaxine in female patients with migraine. Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational case study involving 10 women diagnosed with migraine who were treated with desvenlafaxine. We measured the number of migraine days per month, average headache duration in minutes, headache severity using a visual analog scale, use of acute medications, and frequency of acute medication use per week. Results: Desvenlafaxine significantly reduced the number of migraine days from 14.70 ± 3.68 at baseline to 2.50 ± 2.50 at follow-up (p < 0.05). The average headache duration dropped from 131.25 ± 32.81 min to 52.50 ± 44.64 min. Headache severity scores improved from 6.80 ± 1.49 at baseline to 0.80 ± 0.92 at follow up, the frequency of acute medication use per week reduced from 3.30 ± 1.49 at baseline to 0.80 ± 0.92, and the frequency of acute medication use decreased from 3.30 ± 1.49 times per week to 0.80 ± 0.92. Conclusions: Desvenlafaxine shows potential as an effective prophylactic therapy for migraine. Larger-scale studies are necessary to further explore its benefits. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

15 pages, 14956 KB  
Systematic Review
Reporting Quality and Risk of Bias Analysis of Published RCTs Assessing Anti-CGRP Monoclonal Antibodies in Migraine Prophylaxis: A Systematic Review
by Dimitrios Rikos, Michail Vikelis, Emmanouil V. Dermitzakis, Panagiotis Soldatos, Dimitrios Rallis, Jobst Rudolf, Anna P. Andreou and Andreas A. Argyriou
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(7), 1964; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13071964 - 28 Mar 2024
Viewed by 2706
Abstract
Objective: Phase II/III randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are vulnerable to many types of bias beyond randomization. Insights into the reporting quality of RCTs involving migraine patients treated with monoclonal antibodies targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide system (anti-CGRP MAbs) are currently lacking. Our aim [...] Read more.
Objective: Phase II/III randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are vulnerable to many types of bias beyond randomization. Insights into the reporting quality of RCTs involving migraine patients treated with monoclonal antibodies targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide system (anti-CGRP MAbs) are currently lacking. Our aim was to analyze the reporting quality of phase II/III RCTs involving migraine patients treated with anti-CGRP MAbs. Methods: A systematic search was performed on the PubMed and EMBASE databases, according to PRISMA guidelines, for relevant RCTs in either episodic or chronic migraine prevention. Additionally, an adapted version of the 2010 CONSORT statement checklist was utilized. The ROBvis online tool was used to document the risk of bias. Results: From the initially identified 179 articles, we finally found 31 RCTs that were eligible for evaluation. The average CONSORT compliance was 88.7% (69.7–100%), while 93.5% (N = 29) of the articles had a compliance greater than 75%. Twenty-eight CONSORT items were reported in more than 75% of the articles. The average compliance of the analyzed RCTs was 93.9% for Galcanezumab, 91.3% for Fremanezumab, followed by 85.4% for Erenumab and Eptinezumab studies. Implementation of the ROB2 tool showed some concerning “missing information” arising from the inadequate reporting. Specifically, 50% of the studies (N = 16) were categorized as having inadequate information regarding the randomization process. Conclusions: Adequate reporting quality was disclosed in the evaluated RCTs with anti-CGRP MAbs in migraine prevention. However, some methodological issues need to be highlighted to be addressed in future studies assessing the efficacy of new molecules targeting CGRP or other candidate pathways implicated in migraine pathophysiology. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Clinical Neurology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 285 KB  
Article
Beyond Pain Relief: Unveiling the Multifaceted Impact of Anti-CGRP/R mAbs on Comorbid Symptoms in Resistant Migraine Patients
by Alessandra Della Vecchia, Ciro De Luca, Lucrezia Becattini, Letizia Curto, Elena Ferrari, Gabriele Siciliano, Sara Gori and Filippo Baldacci
Biomedicines 2024, 12(3), 677; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12030677 - 18 Mar 2024
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 4173
Abstract
The study aimed to evaluate the effects of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) acting on the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) or its receptor (anti-CGRP/R mAbs) on migraine comorbidities of depression, anxiety, and fatigue in patients resistant to traditional therapies. The issue addressed in this study [...] Read more.
The study aimed to evaluate the effects of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) acting on the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) or its receptor (anti-CGRP/R mAbs) on migraine comorbidities of depression, anxiety, and fatigue in patients resistant to traditional therapies. The issue addressed in this study is pivotal to unveiling the role of this neurotransmitter beyond pain processing. We conducted an open-label prospective study assessing comorbidities in patients with high frequency (HFEM) and chronic migraine (CM), medication overuse headache (MOH), and resistance to traditional prophylaxis. All patients were treated with anti-CGRP/R mAbs for 3 months. Seventy-seven patients were enrolled with either HFEM (21%) or CM (79%) with or without MOH (56% and 44%, respectively). We identified 21 non-responders (27%) and 56 responders (73%), defined on the reduction ≥50% of headache frequency. The two groups were highly homogeneous for the investigated comorbidities. Disease severity in terms of headache frequency, migraine-related disability, and affective comorbid symptoms was reduced in both groups with different thresholds; allodynia and fatigue were ameliorated only in responders. We found that anti-CGRP/R antibodies improved pain together with affection, fatigue, and sensory sensitization in a cohort of migraine patients resistant to traditional prophylaxis. Our results offer novel perspectives on the early efficacy of anti-CGRP/R mAbs in difficult-to-treat patients focusing on clinical features other than pain relief. Full article
10 pages, 1034 KB  
Article
Anti-CGRP and Anti-CGRP Receptor Monoclonal Antibodies for Migraine Prophylaxis: Retrospective Observational Study on 209 Patients
by Vittorio Schweiger, Paola Bellamoli, Francesco Taus, Leonardo Gottin, Alvise Martini, Marta Nizzero, Eleonora Bonora, Giovanna Del Balzo, Katia Donadello, Erica Secchettin, Gabriele Finco, Daniele De Santis and Enrico Polati
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(4), 1130; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13041130 - 17 Feb 2024
Viewed by 2454
Abstract
Background: Migraine is a neurological disorder characterized by attacks of head pain with prevalent unilateral localization, moderate to high intensity and specifically associated accompanying symptoms. Methods: In this retrospective observational study, we analyzed data regarding 209 patients who had previously been diagnosed with [...] Read more.
Background: Migraine is a neurological disorder characterized by attacks of head pain with prevalent unilateral localization, moderate to high intensity and specifically associated accompanying symptoms. Methods: In this retrospective observational study, we analyzed data regarding 209 patients who had previously been diagnosed with migraine and who were prescribed, between 2019 and 2022, subcutaneous injections of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) fremanezumab or galcanezumab or anti-CGRP receptors mAb erenumab regardless of the concomitant assumption of any other acute-phase or prophylactic migraine medication. Results: Regarding efficacy, in the 205 analyzed patients, the change from baseline in terms of MIDAS, HIT-6, MMDs and MAD scores was statistically significant for erenumab and galcanezumab, while for fremanezumab a statistical significance was not achieved likely due to the small sample size. In the treated population, 36 patients (17.5%) reported AEs (pain during injection, transient injection site erythema, nausea, constipation and fatigue). Only 5 patients (2.4%) discontinued the treatment for AEs while 15 patients (7.3%) left for lack of efficacy. Conclusions: this retrospective study comes out in favor of both significant efficacy and safety of anti-CGRP and anti-CGRP receptors mAbs in migraine patients. Further methodologically stronger studies are necessary to validate our observation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Dental Implantology: Part II)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 790 KB  
Article
Peripheral Endocannabinoid Components and Lipid Plasma Levels in Patients with Resistant Migraine and Co-Morbid Personality and Psychological Disorders: A Cross-Sectional Study
by Sara Bottiroli, Rosaria Greco, Valentina Franco, Annamaria Zanaboni, Michela Palmisani, Gloria Vaghi, Grazia Sances, Roberto De Icco and Cristina Tassorelli
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(3), 1893; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25031893 - 4 Feb 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2272
Abstract
Resistant migraine characterizes those patients who have failed at least three classes of migraine prophylaxis. These difficult-to-treat patients are likely to be characterized by a high prevalence of psychological disturbances. A dysfunction of the endocannabinoid system (ECS), including alteration in the levels of [...] Read more.
Resistant migraine characterizes those patients who have failed at least three classes of migraine prophylaxis. These difficult-to-treat patients are likely to be characterized by a high prevalence of psychological disturbances. A dysfunction of the endocannabinoid system (ECS), including alteration in the levels of endocannabinoid congeners, may underlie several psychiatric disorders and the pathogenesis of migraines. Here we explored whether the peripheral gene expression of major components of the ECS and the plasma levels of endocannabinoids and related lipids are associated with psychological disorders in resistant migraine. Fifty-one patients (age = 46.0 ± 11.7) with resistant migraine received a comprehensive psychological evaluation according to the DSM-5 criteria. Among the patients, 61% had personality disorders (PD) and 61% had mood disorders (MD). Several associations were found between these psychological disorders and peripheral ECS alterations. Lower plasma levels of palmitoiletanolamide (PEA) were found in the PD group compared with the non-PD group. The MD group was characterized by lower mRNA levels of diacylglycerol lipase α (DAGLα) and CB2 (cannabinoid-2) receptor. The results suggest the existence of peripheral dysfunction in some components of the ECS and an alteration in plasma levels of PEA in patients with resistant migraine and mood or personality disorders. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 245 KB  
Article
Nine-Month Continuous Fremanezumab Prophylaxis on the Response to Triptans and Also on the Incidence of Triggers, Hypersensitivity and Prodromal Symptoms of Patients with High-Frequency Episodic Migraine
by Emmanouil V. Dermitzakis, Michail Vikelis, Georgia Xiromerisiou, Dimitrios Rallis, Panagiotis Soldatos, Pantelis Litsardopoulos, Dimitrios Rikos and Andreas A. Argyriou
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(2), 386; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13020386 - 10 Jan 2024
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 1704
Abstract
Objective: To investigate whether the incidence of triggers, prodromal symptoms, hypersensitivity symptoms accompanying headache and responses to triptans were modified during a continuous 9-month fremanezumab therapy for migraine prophylaxis. Patients and methods: We studied 63 patients with high-frequency episodic migraine (HFEM). Enrolled patients [...] Read more.
Objective: To investigate whether the incidence of triggers, prodromal symptoms, hypersensitivity symptoms accompanying headache and responses to triptans were modified during a continuous 9-month fremanezumab therapy for migraine prophylaxis. Patients and methods: We studied 63 patients with high-frequency episodic migraine (HFEM). Enrolled patients received fremanezumab for nine consecutive months before defining the response rates and being stratified into treatment responders (≥50–74% reduction in monthly headache days (MHDs)), super responders (≥75%), partial non-responders (<50%) and super non-responders (<30%). Through headache diaries, patients provided data in order to document the impact of fremanezumab on the incidence of triggers, associated symptoms followed by headache and response to triptans (the use of the migraine treatment optimization questionnaire-4 (mTOQ-4)) during the 9-month treatment period. Results: Fremanezumab had early (after 3 monthly cycles) beneficial effects on the response to triptans in the majority of responders with relevant increases in mTOQ-4 scoring, but also in half of partial non-responders. A significant reduction in median days with migraine-associated symptoms was seen in responders after 6 months of therapy with fremanezumab, mostly for osmophobia, photophobia, phonophobia and nausea/vomiting, but partial non-responders also benefited. Likewise, the incidence of self-reported prodromal symptoms was significantly reduced in responders and was modestly diminished in partial non-responders. Triggers remained unaffected in both responders and non-responders. Conclusions: Fremanezumab given for at least 6–9 months may exert neuromodulatory effects in the migraine brain. These effects could result both in the inhibition of migraine chronification, but also in the diminishing of the magnitude of migraine-associated symptoms, mostly in responders and in partial non-responders. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Clinical Neurology)
6 pages, 568 KB  
Communication
Vestibular Migraine Therapy: Update and Recent Literature Review
by Laura Zanandrea, Bruno Colombo and Massimo Filippi
Audiol. Res. 2023, 13(5), 724-729; https://doi.org/10.3390/audiolres13050064 - 27 Sep 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 7048
Abstract
Vestibular migraine (VM) is a neurological condition that causes vertigo and headache. It is considered the most common cause of episodic vertigo. However, specific treatments are missing, and medications currently used in VM are borrowed from migraine therapy. A comprehensive practical review of [...] Read more.
Vestibular migraine (VM) is a neurological condition that causes vertigo and headache. It is considered the most common cause of episodic vertigo. However, specific treatments are missing, and medications currently used in VM are borrowed from migraine therapy. A comprehensive practical review of the literature assessing the evidence for abortive and preventive interventions in adults with VM was published in 2022, providing practical recommendations about VM treatment. The aim of our paper is to provide an updated overview of the current state of the art of VM treatment, illustrating new evidence available in this field. Along with traditional pharmacological preventive therapies, medications targeting the CGRP pathways have recently been investigated in terms of treatment effect in VM patients, with encouraging results. Also, there is new evidence of the efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions. However, the overall evidence base for VM treatment remains sparse. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Episodic Vertigo: Differences, Overlappings, Opinion and Treatment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop