Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (51)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = left main PCI

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
16 pages, 1811 KiB  
Article
Long-Term Outcome of Unprotected Left Main Percutaneous Coronary Interventions—An 8-Year Single-Tertiary-Care-Center Experience
by Orsolya Nemeth, Tamas Ferenci, Tibor Szonyi, Sandor Szoke, Gabor Fulop, Tunde Pinter, Geza Fontos, Peter Andreka and Zsolt Piroth
J. Pers. Med. 2025, 15(7), 316; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15070316 - 15 Jul 2025
Viewed by 171
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Randomized studies of patients with unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) disease involve highly selected populations. Therefore, we sought to investigate the 60-month event-free survival of consecutive patients undergoing ULMCA percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and determine the best risk score system [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Randomized studies of patients with unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) disease involve highly selected populations. Therefore, we sought to investigate the 60-month event-free survival of consecutive patients undergoing ULMCA percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and determine the best risk score system and independent predictors of event-free survival. Methods: All patients who underwent ULMCA PCI at our center between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2014 were included. The primary endpoint was the time to cardiac death, target lesion myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization (whichever came first) with a follow-up of 60 months. Results: A total of 513 patients (mean age 68 ± 12 years, 64% male, 157 elective, 356 acute) underwent ULMCA PCI. The 60-month incidence of events was 16.8% and 38.0% in elective and acute patients, respectively. There were significantly more events in the acute group during the first 6.5 months. Of the risk scores, the ACEF (AUC = 0.786) and SYNTAX II (AUC = 0.716) scores had the best predictive power in elective and acute patients, respectively. The SYNTAX score proved to be the least predictive in both groups (AUC = 0.638 and 0.614 in the elective and acute groups, respectively). Left ventricular function (hazard ratio (HR) for +10% 0.53 [95% CI, 0.38–0.75] and 0.81 [95% CI, 0.71–0.92] in elective and acute patients, respectively) and, in acute patients, access site (femoral vs. radial HR 1.76 [95% CI, 1.11–2.80]), hyperlipidemia (HR 0.58 [95% CI, 0.39–0.86]), and renal function (HR for +10 mL/min/1.73 m2 higher GFR: 0.87 [95% CI, 0.78–0.97]) were independent predictors of event-free survival. Conclusions: Acute ULMCA PCI patients have worse prognosis than elective patients, having more events during the first 6.5 months. Besides anatomical complexity, clinical and procedural parameters determine the prognosis. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Complex and High-Risk Coronary Interventional Procedures)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 461 KiB  
Review
Latest Evidence on Intravascular Imaging: A Literature Review
by Rafail Koros, Antonios Karanasos, Michail I. Papafaklis, Georgia Xygka, Georgios Vasilagkos, Anastasios Apostolos, Fotios Kallinikos, Maria Papageorgiou, Nikoletta-Maria Tampaki, Charikleia-Maria Fotopoulou, Eleni Lolou, Georgia Gkioni, Periklis Davlouros and Grigorios Tsigkas
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(13), 4714; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14134714 - 3 Jul 2025
Viewed by 377
Abstract
Intravascular imaging (IVI) has emerged as a pivotal tool in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), offering superior visualization of coronary anatomy compared with conventional angiography. This literature review synthesizes the latest evidence from randomized trials and meta-analyses published since 2022, assessing the comparative efficacy [...] Read more.
Intravascular imaging (IVI) has emerged as a pivotal tool in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), offering superior visualization of coronary anatomy compared with conventional angiography. This literature review synthesizes the latest evidence from randomized trials and meta-analyses published since 2022, assessing the comparative efficacy of IVI modalities—including intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT)—in complex coronary lesions. Multiple landmark trials, such as RENOVATE-COMPLEX PCI, ILUMIEN IV, OCTOBER, and OCTIVUS, demonstrated that IVI-guided PCI significantly improves procedural outcomes, stent optimization, and clinical endpoints such as target-vessel failure, myocardial infarction, and stent thrombosis. OCT was shown to be particularly beneficial in bifurcation and left main interventions, while IVUS consistently improved outcomes in long lesions and complex anatomies. Despite some trials not meeting their primary clinical endpoints, substudy findings and pooled analyses support a shift toward routine IVI use in anatomically complex cases. Consequently, updated guidelines now recommend IVI as a Class I indication in select patient populations. These findings underscore the need for broader clinical adoption and training in IVI techniques to enhance PCI outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cardiovascular Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 755 KiB  
Article
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Left Main Disease in High Bleeding Risk: Outcomes from a Subanalysis of the Delta 2 Registry
by Giulia Botti, Francesco Federico, Emanuele Meliga, Joost Daemen, Fabrizio D’Ascenzo, Davide Capodanno, Nicolas Dumonteil, Didier Tchetche, Nicolas M. Van Mieghem, Sunao Nakamura, Philippe Garot, Andrejs Erglis, Ciro Vella, Corrado Tamburino, Marie Claude Morice, Roxana Mehran, Matteo Montorfano and Alaide Chieffo
J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2025, 12(5), 179; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd12050179 - 11 May 2025
Viewed by 491
Abstract
High bleeding risk (HBR) is a challenge in patients with complex coronary lesions undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This study investigates HBR in a wide and comprehensive cohort of patients undergoing left main (LM) PCI and reports in-hospital and follow-up outcomes. The analysis [...] Read more.
High bleeding risk (HBR) is a challenge in patients with complex coronary lesions undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This study investigates HBR in a wide and comprehensive cohort of patients undergoing left main (LM) PCI and reports in-hospital and follow-up outcomes. The analysis was performed on data from the DELTA (Drug Eluting Stent for Left Main Coronary Artery) 2 Registry, which included patients who underwent LM PCI at 19 centres worldwide. The patients were defined to be at HBR if ≥1 major criterion or ≥2 minor criteria from the Academic Research Consortium (ARC) were met. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI) or cerebrovascular accident (CVA) at median follow-up. A total of 1531 patients were included, and the rate of HBR was 65.8%. Besides the different clinical characteristics embedded in the ARC definition, HBR patients had higher prevalence of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) at presentation (49.2% vs. 26.8%, p < 0.001) and experienced higher in-hospital mortality (1.8% vs. 0.2%; p = 0.029) and MI (5.0% vs. 2.1%, p = 0.009). The median follow-up was 473 days. The rate of the primary endpoint was more than three times higher in HBR patients (20.8% vs. 6.1%; HR 3.3; 95%CI: 2.2–4.8) and driven by all-cause death at multivariate regression analysis. Conversely, no significant difference in target lesion revascularization and probable or defined stent thrombosis was reported. HBR patients undergoing LM PCI experienced higher rates of all-cause death at follow-up; similar outcomes were also reported in-hospital. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Acquired Cardiovascular Disease)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 2161 KiB  
Article
Validation of EuroSCORE II, ACEF Score, CHA2DS2-VASc, and CHA2DS2-VA in Patients Undergoing Left Main Coronary Artery Angioplasty: Analysis from All-Comers BIA-LM Registry
by Emil Julian Dąbrowski, Paweł Kralisz, Konrad Nowak, Kamil Gugała, Przemysław Prokopczuk, Grzegorz Mężyński, Michał Święczkowski, Sławomir Dobrzycki and Marcin Kożuch
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(22), 6907; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13226907 - 16 Nov 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 939
Abstract
Background: Simple surgical and clinical risk scores are useful in mortality prediction. Aims: The study’s aim was to validate three scores in real-world registry of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for the left main coronary artery (LMCA). Methods: All data were [...] Read more.
Background: Simple surgical and clinical risk scores are useful in mortality prediction. Aims: The study’s aim was to validate three scores in real-world registry of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for the left main coronary artery (LMCA). Methods: All data were obtained from the BIA-LM Registry. Discrimination and calibration of EuroSCORE II, ACEF, CHA2DS2-VASc, and CHA2DS2-VA were assessed with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves analysis and Hosmer–Lemeshow (HL) test. Results: The final cohort included 851 patients, median age was 71, and 156 patients had history of previous coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Median EuroSCORE II, ACEF, CHA2DS2-VASc, and CHA2DS2-VA were 3.1% (IQR 5.4%), 1.56 (IQR 0.9), 4 (IQR 2), and 4 (IQR 2), respectively. In the short- (30 days) and long-term (mean 4.1 years), there were 27 and 318 deaths. In short-term, EuroSCORE II showed the best discrimination in the overall population and subgroup with unprotected LMCA [area under the curve (AUC) 0.804, 95% CI 0.717–0.890 and AUC 0.826, 95% CI 0.737–0.913, respectively, p < 0.001 for comparisons with other models), with the best cut-off value at 7.1%. In long-term observation, EuroSCORE II and ACEF showed good predictive value (overall population: AUC 0.716, 95% CI 0.680–0.750 and AUC 0.725, 95% CI 0.690–760, respectively). In short- and long-term observation, EuroSCORE II and ACEF showed poor calibration (HL test p < 0.05) as compared to CHA2DS2-VASc (HL test p = 0.40 and 0.18). Conclusions: EuroSCORE II showed good mortality prediction in short-term observation; however, its predicted risk should be interpreted with caution due to poor calibration. ACEF and EuroSCORE II may be useful in long-term mortality prediction. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

8 pages, 2753 KiB  
Case Report
The Role of Intravascular Ultrasound in the Evaluation and Treatment of Free-Floating Stent Struts Following Inadequate Ostial Circumflex Stenting: A Case Report
by Milorad Tesic, Djordje Mladenovic, Vladan Vukcevic, Dario Jelic and Dejan Milasinovic
Medicina 2024, 60(10), 1563; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60101563 - 24 Sep 2024
Viewed by 1431
Abstract
Introduction: Excessive stent strut protrusion in the distal left main (LM) from either the left anterior descending (LAD) or circumflex (Cx) artery following inadequate ostial stenting may complicate any later procedure involving the left coronary artery. In such case scenarios, intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) [...] Read more.
Introduction: Excessive stent strut protrusion in the distal left main (LM) from either the left anterior descending (LAD) or circumflex (Cx) artery following inadequate ostial stenting may complicate any later procedure involving the left coronary artery. In such case scenarios, intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance provides accurate assessment of the ostial stent position and may facilitate subsequent management strategies and treatment. Case summary: We present a complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of LM bifurcation in a 49-year-old man following inadequate ostial Cx stenting that resulted in excessive stent protrusion in the distal LM segment, accompanied by a subsequent short 80–90% ostial LAD stenosis. Initially, IVUS was performed to confirm “floating struts” from a previous Cx ostial stenting and to ensure complete intraluminal placement of the wire within the stent leading to the Cx, precluding any side passage through the stent struts. Then, a second wire was inserted into the LAD through the most distal stent strut under live IVUS guidance. Further PCI was completed according to the principles of the double kissing mini-culotte technique. Final IVUS runs confirmed correct stent apposition and expansion in the LM, LAD and Cx segments. Conclusions: In cases involving the treatment of “free-floating” struts in the distal LM artery, intravascular imaging is essential to ensure optimal PCI outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advancements in Cardiovascular Medicine and Interventional Radiology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1575 KiB  
Article
Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: 6 versus 12 Months
by Tau Sarra Hartikainen, Sina Mertins, Max Behrens, Franz-Josef Neumann, Christian Marc Valina, Nikolaus Löffelhardt, Faridun Daniel Rahimi Nedjat, Philipp Breitbart, Kilian Franke, Dirk Westermann and Miroslaw Ferenc
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(18), 5449; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13185449 - 13 Sep 2024
Viewed by 1495
Abstract
Background/Objectives: For patients with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of an unprotected left main coronary artery (uLMCA) stenosis, the optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) remains a matter of debate. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of 6- [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: For patients with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of an unprotected left main coronary artery (uLMCA) stenosis, the optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) remains a matter of debate. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of 6- versus 12-month DAPT duration in patients with PCI of an uLMCA and stable angina. Methods: In this retrospective analysis, we included consecutive patients of our centre who underwent PCI of uLMCA stenosis for stable angina and who received DAPT with acetylsalicylic acid and clopidogrel for either 6 or 12 months. The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization at one year. Secondary endpoints included individual components of the primary endpoint, definite/probable stent thrombosis, and bleeding. Clinical outcomes were assessed by unadjusted analysis and by inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Results: Out of 984 included patients, 339 (34.5%) received DAPT for 6 months and 645 (65.5%) for 12 months. The primary endpoint occurred in 51 patients (15.2%) in the 6-month group and in 104 (16.3%) in the 12-month group (p = 0.674). Incidences of stent thrombosis (0.9% versus 0.3%, p = 0.224) and BARC 3,4,5 bleeding (6% versus 5.8%, p = 0.808) were also comparable in both groups. We found no significant differences in the primary endpoint and its components or BARC 3,4,5 bleeding between 6 and 12 months. Conclusions: Our findings do not support the extension of DAPT beyond 6 months after PCI for uLMCA in patients with stable angina. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cardiology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 940 KiB  
Article
Combined Computed Coronary Tomography Angiography and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) Planning Computed Tomography Reliably Detects Relevant Coronary Artery Disease Pre-TAVI
by Dominik Felbel, Christoph Buck, Natalie Riedel, Michael Paukovitsch, Tilman Stephan, Marvin Krohn-Grimberghe, Johannes Mörike, Birgid Gonska, Christoph Panknin, Christopher Kloth, Meinrad Beer, Wolfgang Rottbauer and Dominik Buckert
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(16), 4885; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13164885 - 19 Aug 2024
Viewed by 1335
Abstract
Background: Before surgical or transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), coronary status evaluation is required. The role of combined computed coronary tomography angiography (cCTA) and TAVI planning CT in this context is not yet well elucidated. This study assessed whether relevant proximal coronary disease [...] Read more.
Background: Before surgical or transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), coronary status evaluation is required. The role of combined computed coronary tomography angiography (cCTA) and TAVI planning CT in this context is not yet well elucidated. This study assessed whether relevant proximal coronary disease requiring coronary revascularization can be safely detected by combined cCTA and TAVI planning CT, including CT-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR) calculation in patients with severe aortic stenosis. Methods: This study analyzed patients with successful cCTA combined with TAVI planning CT using a 128-slice dual-source scanner. The detection via cCTA of relevant left main stem stenosis (>50%) or proximal coronary artery stenosis (>70%) was compared to invasive coronary angiography (ICA). Results: This study comprised 101 consecutive TAVI patients with a median age of 83 [77–86] years, a median STS score of 3.7 [2.4–6.1] and 54% of whom had known coronary artery disease. Of 15 patients with relevant coronary stenoses, 14 (93.3%) were detected with cCTA, while false positive results were found in 25 patients. Only in patients with previous percutaneous coronary stent implantation (PCI) were false positive rates (11/29) increased. In the subgroup without previous PCI, an improved classification performance of 87.5%, being mainly due to 11.1% false positive classifications, led to a negative predictive value of 98.5%. Conclusions: Combined cCTA and CT-FFR with TAVI planning CT via state-of-the-art scanners and protocols as a one-stop shop can replace routine ICA in patients prior to TAVI due to its safe detection of relevant coronary artery stenosis, although diagnostic performance of cCTA is only reduced in patients with coronary stents. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1246 KiB  
Article
Characterization and Management of Stable Coronary Artery Disease in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
by Sofia Sammartino, Giulia Laterra, Thomas Pilgrim, Ignacio J. Amat Santos, Ole De Backer, Won-Keun Kim, Henrique Barbosa Ribeiro, Francesco Saia, Matjaz Bunc, Didier Tchetche, Philippe Garot, Flavio Luciano Ribichini, Darren Mylotte, Francesco Burzotta, Yusuke Watanabe, Francesco Bedogni, Tullio Tesorio, Tobias Rheude, Gennaro Sardella, Marco Tocci, Anna Franzone, Roberto Valvo, Mikko Savontaus, Hendrik Wienemann, Italo Porto, Caterina Gandolfo, Alessandro Iadanza, Alessandro Santo Bortone, Markus Mach, Azeem Latib, Luigi Biasco, Maurizio Taramasso, Federico De Marco, Valentina Frittitta, Elena Dipietro, Claudia Reddavid, Orazio Strazzieri, Silvia Motta, Alessandro Comis, Chiara Melfa, Mariachiara Calì, Carmelo Sgroi, Mohamed Abdel-Wahab, Giulio Stefanini, Corrado Tamburino, Marco Barbanti and Giuliano Costaadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(12), 3497; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13123497 - 14 Jun 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1596
Abstract
Background/Objectives: To date, data regarding the characteristics and management of obstructive, stable coronary artery disease (CAD) encountered in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are sparse. The aim of the study was to analyze granular details, treatment, and outcomes of patients [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: To date, data regarding the characteristics and management of obstructive, stable coronary artery disease (CAD) encountered in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are sparse. The aim of the study was to analyze granular details, treatment, and outcomes of patients undergoing TAVI with obstructive, stable CAD from real-world practice. Methods: REVASC-TAVI (Management of myocardial REVASCularization in patients undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation with coronary artery disease) is an investigator-initiated, multicenter registry, which collected data from patients undergoing TAVI with obstructive stable CAD found during the pre-TAVI work-up. Results: A total of 2025 patients from 30 centers worldwide with complete follow-up were included in the registry. Most patients had single-vessel CAD (56.1%). An involvement of proximal coronary tracts was detected in 62.5% of cases, with 12.0% of patients having CAD in left main (LM). Most patients received percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (n = 1617, 79.9%), especially those with proximal CAD (90.4%). At 2 years, the rates of all-cause death [Kaplan–Meier (KM) estimates 20.1% vs. 18.8%, plog-rank = 0.86] and of the composite of all-cause death, stroke, myocardial infarction, and rehospitalization for heart failure (KM estimates 29.7% vs. 27.5%, plog-rank = 0.82) did not differ between patients undergoing PCI and those who were not. Conclusions: Patients undergoing TAVI with obstructive CAD more commonly had a single-vessel disease and an involvement of proximal coronary tracts. They were commonly treated with PCI, with similar outcomes compared to those treated conservatively. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Insights into Coronary Artery Disease (CAD))
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1390 KiB  
Article
Prevalence and Impact of Concomitant Atrial Fibrillation in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Myocardial Infarction
by Iqra Shakeel, Harish Sharma, James Hodson, Hamna Iqbal, Rashna Tashfeen, Peter F. Ludman, Richard P. Steeds, Jonathan N. Townend, Sagar N. Doshi and M. Adnan Nadir
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(8), 2318; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13082318 - 17 Apr 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1357
Abstract
Background: Concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with an adverse prognosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI). However, it remains unclear whether this is due to a causal effect of AF or whether AF acts as a surrogate marker for comorbidities in [...] Read more.
Background: Concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with an adverse prognosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI). However, it remains unclear whether this is due to a causal effect of AF or whether AF acts as a surrogate marker for comorbidities in this population. Furthermore, there are limited data on whether coronary artery disease distribution impacts the risk of developing AF. Methods: Consecutive patients admitted with acute MI and treated using percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) at a single centre were retrospectively identified. Associations between AF and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) over a median of five years of follow-up were assessed using Cox regression, with adjustment for confounding factors performed using both multivariable modelling and a propensity-score-matched analysis. Results: AF was identified in N = 65/1000 (6.5%) of cases; these patients were significantly older (mean: 73 vs. 65 years, p < 0.001), with lower creatinine clearance (p < 0.001), and were more likely to have a history of cerebrovascular disease (p = 0.011) than those without AF. In addition, patients with AF had a greater propensity for left main stem (p = 0.001) or left circumflex artery (p = 0.004) involvement. Long-term MACCE rates were significantly higher in the AF group than in the non-AF group (50.8% vs. 34.2% at five years), yielding an unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 1.86 (95% CI: 1.32–2.64, p < 0.001). However, after adjustment for confounding factors, AF was no longer independently associated with MACCEs, either on multivariable (adjusted HR: 1.25, 95% CI: 0.81–1.92, p = 0.319) or propensity-score-matched (HR: 1.04, 95% CI: 0.59–1.82, p = 0.886) analyses. Conclusions: AF is observed in 6.5% of patients admitted with acute MI, and those with AF are more likely to have significant diseases involving left main or circumflex arteries. Although unadjusted MACCE rates were significantly higher in patients with AF, this effect was not found to remain significant after adjustment for comorbidities. As such, this study provided no evidence to suggest that AF is independently associated with MACCEs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnosis, Monitoring, and Treatment of Myocardial Infarction)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 490 KiB  
Article
Long Stent Implantation on the Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery at a Follow-Up of More Than Five Years
by Alessandro Sticchi, Concetta Tatali, Massimo Ferraro, Arif A. Khokhar, Alessandra Scoccia, Alberto Cereda, Marco Toselli, Francesco Gallo, Alessandra Laricchia, Antonio Mangieri, Francesco Grigioni, Gian Paolo Ussia, Francesco Giannini and Antonio Colombo
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(1), 210; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13010210 - 29 Dec 2023
Viewed by 2129
Abstract
Background: Stent implantation represents the standard of care in coronary intervention. While a short stent implanted on a focal lesion located on the left anterior descending artery (LAD) seems a reasonable alternative to an internal mammary implant, the same for long stents is [...] Read more.
Background: Stent implantation represents the standard of care in coronary intervention. While a short stent implanted on a focal lesion located on the left anterior descending artery (LAD) seems a reasonable alternative to an internal mammary implant, the same for long stents is still debated. Methods: We reported the long-term data of 531 consecutive patients who underwent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) with long stents in two highly specialized centres. The main inclusion criteria were the implantation of stents longer than 30 mm on the LAD and a minimum follow-up (FU) of five years. The primary endpoint was mortality, and the secondary endpoints were any myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel and lesion revascularization (TVR and TLR, respectively), and stent thrombosis (ST) observed as definite, probable, or possible. Results: In this selected population with characteristics of complex PCI (99.1%), the long-term follow-up (mean 92.18 ± 35.5 months) estimates of all-cause death, cardiovascular death, and any myocardial infarction were 18.3%, 10.5%, and 9.3%, respectively. Both all-cause and cardiovascular deaths are significantly associated with three-vessel disease (HR 6.8; confidence of interval (CI) 95% 3.844–11.934; p < 0.001, and HR 4.7; CI 95% 2.265–9.835; p < 0.001, respectively). Target lesion (TLR) and target vessel revascularization (TVR) are associated with the presence of three-lesion disease on the LAD (HR 3.4; CI 95% 1.984–5.781; p < 0.001; HR 3.9 CI 95% 2.323–6.442; p < 0.001, respectively). Re-PCI for any cause occurred in 31.5% of patients and shows an increased risk for three-lesion stenting (HR 4.3; CI 95% 2.873–6.376; p < 0.001) and the treatment of bifurcation with two stents (HR 1.6; 95% CI 1.051–2.414; p = 0.028). Stent thrombosis rate at the 5-year FU was 4.4% (1.3% definite; 0.9% probable; 2.1% possible), including a 1.7% rate of very-late thrombosis. The stent length superior to 40 mm was not associated with poor outcomes (all-cause death p = 0.349; cardiovascular death p = 0.855; MI p = 0.691; re-PCI p = 0.234; TLR p = 0.805; TVR p = 0.087; ST p = 0.189). Conclusion: At an FU of longer than five years, patients treated with stents longer than 30 mm in their LAD showed acceptable procedural results but poor outcomes. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

16 pages, 762 KiB  
Article
Reduced Left Ventricular Twist Early after Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction as a Predictor of Left Ventricular Adverse Remodelling
by Mihai-Andrei Lazăr, Ioana Ionac, Constantin-Tudor Luca, Lucian Petrescu, Cristina Vacarescu, Simina Crisan, Dan Gaiță, Dragos Cozma, Raluca Sosdean, Diana-Aurora Arnăutu, Alina-Ramona Cozlac, Slivia-Ana Luca, Andra Gurgu, Claudia Totorean and Cristian Mornos
Diagnostics 2023, 13(18), 2896; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13182896 - 9 Sep 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1595
Abstract
Background: The left ventricular (LV) remodelling process represents the main cause of heart failure after a ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE) can detect early deformation impairment, while also predicting LV remodelling during follow-up. The aim of this study was to [...] Read more.
Background: The left ventricular (LV) remodelling process represents the main cause of heart failure after a ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE) can detect early deformation impairment, while also predicting LV remodelling during follow-up. The aim of this study was to investigate the STE parameters in predicting cardiac remodelling following a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in STEMI patients. Methods: The study population consisted of 60 patients with acute STEMI and no history of prior myocardial infarction treated with PCI. The patients were assessed both by conventional transthoracic and ST echocardiography in the first 12 h after admission and 6 months after the acute phase. Adverse remodelling was defined as an increase in LVEDV and/or LVESV by 15%. Results: Adverse remodelling occurred in 26 patients (43.33%). By multivariate regression equation, the risk of adverse remodelling increases with age (by 1.1-fold), triglyceride level (by 1.009-fold), and midmyocardial radial strain (mid-RS) (1.06-fold). Increased initial twist decreases the chances of adverse remodelling (0.847-fold). The LV twist presented the largest area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to predict adverse remodelling (AUROC = 0.648; 95% CI [0.506;0.789], p = 0.04). A twist value higher than 11° has a 76.9% specificity and a 72.7% positive predictive value for reverse remodelling at 6 months. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cardiovascular Diseases: Diagnosis and Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1615 KiB  
Article
Functional (Re)Development of SYNTAX Score II 2020: Predictive Performance and Risk Assessment
by Antonella Scala, Andrea Erriquez, Filippo Maria Verardi, Andrea Marrone, Ennio Scollo, Michele Trichilo, Alessandro Durante, Delio Tedeschi, Bernardo Cortese, Alfonso Ielasi, Giuliano Valentini, Matteo Tebaldi, Gianluca Campo, Rita Pavasini and Simone Biscaglia
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(18), 5844; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12185844 - 8 Sep 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1807
Abstract
The present study investigates the prognostic value of the Syntax Score II 2020 corrected for flow-limiting lesions and its ability to better address treatment by benefit prediction among patients with left main or multivessel disease. We analyzed 1274 patients from the HALE-BOPP cohort [...] Read more.
The present study investigates the prognostic value of the Syntax Score II 2020 corrected for flow-limiting lesions and its ability to better address treatment by benefit prediction among patients with left main or multivessel disease. We analyzed 1274 patients from the HALE-BOPP cohort and integrated the Syntax Score II 2020 with the result of the fractional flow reserve (FFR) evaluation. Absolute risk difference (ARD) between surgical and percutaneous revascularization was calculated for anatomic and functional Syntax Score II 2020 predicted mortality. The ARD allowed to stratify the population into two large categories: “coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) better” with ARD ≥ 4.5% and “CABG–percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) equipoise” with ARD < 4.5%. The mean global anatomical Syntax Score was 15.5 ± 9.2, whereas the functional one was 9.5 ± 10 (p < 0.01). Using the anatomic Syntax Score II 2020, 881 patients had a CABG-PCI equipoise. This number increased to 1041 after considering only flow-limiting lesions by FFR (p < 0.001); therefore, 40% of CABG better patients were reclassified within the CABG-PCI equipoise category. Kaplan–Maier curves showed similar actual survival rates for patients originally with CABG-PCI equipoise and those reclassified, in both cases higher than those from CABG better patients (p < 0.01). The integration between Syntax Score II 2020 and physiology is feasible, and merging clinical, anatomic and functional data allows for better risk prediction and therapeutic guidance. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cardiovascular Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

45 pages, 1756 KiB  
Review
Coronary No-Reflow after Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention—Current Knowledge on Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, Clinical Impact and Therapy
by Gjin Ndrepepa and Adnan Kastrati
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(17), 5592; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12175592 - 27 Aug 2023
Cited by 22 | Viewed by 11576
Abstract
Coronary no-reflow (CNR) is a frequent phenomenon that develops in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) following reperfusion therapy. CNR is highly dynamic, develops gradually (over hours) and persists for days to weeks after reperfusion. Microvascular obstruction (MVO) developing as a consequence [...] Read more.
Coronary no-reflow (CNR) is a frequent phenomenon that develops in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) following reperfusion therapy. CNR is highly dynamic, develops gradually (over hours) and persists for days to weeks after reperfusion. Microvascular obstruction (MVO) developing as a consequence of myocardial ischemia, distal embolization and reperfusion-related injury is the main pathophysiological mechanism of CNR. The frequency of CNR or MVO after primary PCI differs widely depending on the sensitivity of the tools used for diagnosis and timing of examination. Coronary angiography is readily available and most convenient to diagnose CNR but it is highly conservative and underestimates the true frequency of CNR. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is the most sensitive method to diagnose MVO and CNR that provides information on the presence, localization and extent of MVO. CMR imaging detects intramyocardial hemorrhage and accurately estimates the infarct size. MVO and CNR markedly negate the benefits of reperfusion therapy and contribute to poor clinical outcomes including adverse remodeling of left ventricle, worsening or new congestive heart failure and reduced survival. Despite extensive research and the use of therapies that target almost all known pathophysiological mechanisms of CNR, no therapy has been found that prevents or reverses CNR and provides consistent clinical benefit in patients with STEMI undergoing reperfusion. Currently, the prevention or alleviation of MVO and CNR remain unmet goals in the therapy of STEMI that continue to be under intense research. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Coronary Artery Disease Interventions)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 269 KiB  
Review
Invasive Functional Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease in Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis in the TAVI Era
by Maren Weferling and Won-Keun Kim
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(16), 5414; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12165414 - 21 Aug 2023
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2743
Abstract
Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a common finding in patients suffering from aortic valve stenosis (AS), with a prevalence of over 50% in patients 70 years of age or older. Transcatheter aortic valve intervention (TAVI) is the standard treatment option for patients with [...] Read more.
Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a common finding in patients suffering from aortic valve stenosis (AS), with a prevalence of over 50% in patients 70 years of age or older. Transcatheter aortic valve intervention (TAVI) is the standard treatment option for patients with severe AS and at least 75 years of age. Current guidelines recommend percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients planned for TAVI with stenoses of >70% in the proximal segments of non-left main coronary arteries and in >50% of left main stenoses. While the guidelines on myocardial revascularization clearly recommend functional assessment of coronary artery stenoses of less than 90% in the absence of non-invasive ischemia testing, a statement regarding invasive functional testing in AS patients with concomitant CAD is lacking in the recently published guideline on the management of valvular heart disease. This review aims to provide an overview of the hemodynamic background in AS patients, discusses and summarizes the current evidence of invasive functional testing in patients with severe AS, and gives a future perspective on the ongoing trials on that topic. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cardiology)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

9 pages, 504 KiB  
Article
Acute Coronary Syndrome Presenting during On- and Off-Hours: Is There a Difference in a Tertiary Cardiovascular Center?
by Ivan Ilic, Anja Radunovic, Milica Matic, Vasko Zugic, Miljana Ostojic, Milica Stanojlovic, Dejan Kojic, Srdjan Boskovic, Dusan Borzanovic, Stefan Timcic, Dragana Radoicic, Milan Dobric and Milosav Tomovic
Medicina 2023, 59(8), 1420; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59081420 - 4 Aug 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1649
Abstract
Background and Objectives: ACS presents an acute manifestation of coronary artery disease and its treatment is based on timely interventional diagnostics and PCI. It has been known that the treatment and the outcomes are not the same for all the patients with [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: ACS presents an acute manifestation of coronary artery disease and its treatment is based on timely interventional diagnostics and PCI. It has been known that the treatment and the outcomes are not the same for all the patients with ACS during the working day, depending on the availability of the procedures and staff. The aim of the study was to explore the differences in clinical characteristics and outcomes in patients admitted for ACS during on- and off-hours. Materials and Methods: The retrospective study included 1873 consecutive ACS patients admitted to a tertiary, university hospital that underwent coronary angiography and intervention. On-hours were defined from Monday to Friday from 07:30 h to 14:30 h, while the rest was considered off-hours. Results: There were more males in the off-hours group (on-hours 475 (56%) vs. off-hours 635 (62%); p = 0.011), while previous MI was more frequent in the on-hours group (on 250 (30%) vs. off 148 (14%); p < 0.001). NSTEMI was more frequent during on-hours (on 164 (19%) vs. off 55 (5%); p < 0.001), while STEMI was more frequent during off-hours (on 585 (69%) vs. off 952 (93%); p < 0.001). Patients admitted during on-hours had more multivessel disease (MVD) (on 485 (57%) vs. off 489 (48%); p = 0.006), as well as multivessel PCI (on 187 (22%) vs. off 171 (16%); p = 0.002), while radial access was preferred in off-hours patients (on 692 (82%) vs. off 883 (86%); p = 0.004). Left main PCI was performed with similar frequency in both groups (on 37 (4%) vs. off 35 (3%); p = 0.203). Death occurred with similar frequency in both groups (on 17 (2.0%) vs. off 26 (2.54%); p = 0.404), while major adverse cardio-cerebral events (MACCEs) were more frequent in the on-hours group (on 105 (12.4%) vs. off 70 (6.8%); p = 0.039) probably due to the more frequent repeated PCI (on 49 (5.8%) vs. off 27 (2.6%); p = 0.035). Conclusions: Patients admitted for ACS during working hours in a tertiary hospital present with more complex CAD, have more demanding interventions, and experience more MACCEs during follow-up mostly due to myocardial infarctions and repeated procedures. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cardiology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop