Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (40)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = left bundle branch block (LBBB)

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
11 pages, 708 KiB  
Article
The Role of 6-Hour ECG in Patients with Left Bundle Branch Block After TAVI in Determining Same-Day Discharge
by Muntaser Omari, Saif Memon, Debbie Stewart, Mohamed Ali, Richard Edwards, Rajiv Das, Timothy Cartlidge, Azfar Zaman, Mohamed Farag and Mohammad Alkhalil
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(15), 5408; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14155408 - 31 Jul 2025
Viewed by 297
Abstract
Background: Left bundle branch block (LBBB) following trans-catheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has been excluded from same-day discharge. Early identification of patients with stable LBBB can help facilitate same-day discharge. We aim to assess the role of 6-hour ECG to determine development [...] Read more.
Background: Left bundle branch block (LBBB) following trans-catheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has been excluded from same-day discharge. Early identification of patients with stable LBBB can help facilitate same-day discharge. We aim to assess the role of 6-hour ECG to determine development of LBBB in patients undergoing TAVI. Methods: This is a prospective single-centre study of patients who have LBBB following elective TAVI procedures. All patients underwent ECGs pre-TAVI, as well as immediately, 6 h, and 24 h post-TAVI. Changes in ECG were compared at 6 and 24 h with the one immediately post TAVI. Results: The study included 115 patients with uncomplicated procedures. The mean age was 81 ± 7 years, with 54% male. A self-expanding valve was used in 67% of patients. Following TAVI, prolongations of PR interval and QRS duration were dynamic and reduced at 6 h. The change in PR interval at 6 and 24 h was comparable [−11 (−20 to 3) vs. −2 (−24 to 16) ms, p = 0.18]. Similarly, there was no statistical difference in the change of QRS duration at 6 and 24 h compared to the ECG immediately post-TAVI [−10 (−40 to −2) vs. −7 (−34 to 0) ms, p = 0.055]. Changes in ECG were also comparable in patients undergoing balloon-expandable and self-expanding valves. Conclusions: The current study supports that 6-hour ECG has the potential to reduce the need for prolonged continuous monitoring post-TAVI. ECG at 6 h can help optimise patient flow and facilitate early discharge. Future studies with larger sample sizes are required to confirm our findings. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 2317 KiB  
Article
Detecting Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction in Left Bundle Branch Block Patients Using Electrocardiogram: A Deep Learning Approach with Limited Data
by Chanjin Kwon, Hye Bin Gwag and Jongwon Seok
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(15), 8384; https://doi.org/10.3390/app15158384 - 29 Jul 2025
Viewed by 259
Abstract
Left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) is associated with increased mortality and is sometimes reversible when found early. Artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled electrocardiogram (ECG) has emerged as an efficient screening tool for LVSD, but has not been validated in left bundle branch block (LBBB) patients. [...] Read more.
Left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) is associated with increased mortality and is sometimes reversible when found early. Artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled electrocardiogram (ECG) has emerged as an efficient screening tool for LVSD, but has not been validated in left bundle branch block (LBBB) patients. The clinical significance of developing an AI prediction model for LBBB patients lies in the fact that LBBB can be a cause, consequence, or both of LVSD. This pilot study was designed to develop an AI model for LVSD detection in the LBBB population using a limited dataset. ECG data from 508 patients with sinus rhythm and LBBB were labeled based on an LVSD threshold of 35%. To enhance the performance of a model derived from such a small and skewed dataset, we combined an autoencoder-based anomaly detection model with a convolutional neural network (CNN). We used a lead-wise ensemble technique for the final classification. Experimental results showed an accuracy of 0.81, precision of 0.87, recall of 0.56, and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.75 in LVSD prediction among LBBB patients. Despite the limited dataset size, our study findings suggest the potential of deep learning techniques in detecting LVSD in patients with LBBB. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Progress and Challenges of Digital Health and Bioengineering)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 874 KiB  
Systematic Review
Conduction System Pacing Versus Biventricular Cardiac Resynchronization Pacing: Meta-Analysis on Outcomes in Patients with Non-Left Bundle Branch Block
by Xuanming Pung, Joe J. L. Chua, Khi Yung Fong, Yi Yi Chua, Germaine J. M. Loo, Jonathan W. S. Ong, Julian C. K. Tay, Hooi Khee Teo, Yue Wang, Colin Yeo, Eric T. S. Lim, Kah Leng Ho, Daniel T. T. Chong, Chi Keong Ching and Vern Hsen Tan
Medicina 2025, 61(7), 1240; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61071240 - 9 Jul 2025
Viewed by 367
Abstract
Background and Objectives: The role of biventricular pacing (BVP) is less well-established in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) without left bundle branch block (LBBB). Conduction system pacing (CSP) has gained significant traction and may provide a safe and [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: The role of biventricular pacing (BVP) is less well-established in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) without left bundle branch block (LBBB). Conduction system pacing (CSP) has gained significant traction and may provide a safe and more physiological alternative to BVP in these patients. A few small studies studying this question have reported conflicting results. This meta-analysis aims to compare procedural and clinical outcomes between CSP and BVP in this group. Materials and Methods: An online literature search was systematically conducted to retrieve studies comparing CSP and BVP in HFrEF patients with non-LBBB. Four studies with 461 patients were included. Results: Implant-derived paced QRS duration was significantly shorter (mean difference [MD] −19.7 ms, 95% confidence interval [CI] −36.2 to −3.3, p = 0.0355) with CSP. Echocardiographic response with significantly greater improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (MD 5.6%, 95% CI 3.1 to 8.0, p = 0.0106) was also observed with CSP. There were no statistically significant differences in clinical outcomes such as all-cause mortality (relative risk [RR] 0.53, 95% CI 0.18 to 1.60, p = 0.133) and heart failure hospitalization (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.19 to 1.56, p = 0.129). Conclusions: This meta-analysis suggests that CSP may have better electrical synchrony and echocardiographic response compared to BVP in HFrEF patients with non-LBBB. Further randomized studies with longer follow-up may be required to elucidate potential benefits in clinical outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cardiology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 794 KiB  
Review
New-Onset Left Bundle Branch Block and Other Conduction Disturbances After TAVR: Incidence, Predictors, and Clinical Implications
by Dorota Bartusik-Aebisher, Iga Serafin and David Aebisher
Prosthesis 2025, 7(4), 71; https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis7040071 - 25 Jun 2025
Viewed by 712
Abstract
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is now established as a safe and effective treatment for severe aortic stenosis across all surgical risk categories. Nevertheless, periprocedural conduction disturbances—including new-onset left bundle branch block (LBBB), right bundle branch block (RBBB), and other intraventricular blocks—remain among [...] Read more.
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is now established as a safe and effective treatment for severe aortic stenosis across all surgical risk categories. Nevertheless, periprocedural conduction disturbances—including new-onset left bundle branch block (LBBB), right bundle branch block (RBBB), and other intraventricular blocks—remain among the most frequent complications, often resulting in permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation and impacting left ventricular remodeling. A review was conducted using the PubMed/MEDLINE database. Relevant clinical trials, observational studies, and meta-analyses addressing post-TAVR LBBB were included and analysed with a focus on frequency, risk factors, and association with adverse outcomes. We describe the incidence of post-TAVR conduction disturbances and identify key predictors: pre-existing RBBB, membranous septum length, valve oversizing, implantation depth, infra-annular leaflet extension, compression ratio, and valve type/generation. New-onset LBBB is a frequent complication after TAVR and may negatively affect patient outcomes. Accurate risk stratification and standardised post-procedural monitoring protocols are essential. Further prospective studies are needed to better define management strategies for patients developing LBBB after TAVR. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 2978 KiB  
Article
Acute Effects of Fusion Pacing Versus Standard CRT on Myocardial Function in Heart Failure Patients with LBBB
by Michał Kucio, Andrzej Kułach, Tomasz Skowerski, Mariusz Bałys, Mariusz Skowerski and Grzegorz Smolka
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(13), 4433; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14134433 - 22 Jun 2025
Viewed by 374
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Although cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) plays an established role in the management of heart failure, a significant proportion of patients do not respond despite appropriate candidate selection. The optimization of CRT pacing is one strategy to enhance response. Fusion pacing algorithms aim [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Although cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) plays an established role in the management of heart failure, a significant proportion of patients do not respond despite appropriate candidate selection. The optimization of CRT pacing is one strategy to enhance response. Fusion pacing algorithms aim to synchronize intrinsic right ventricular (RV) conduction with paced left ventricular (LV) activation, resulting in a more physiological ventricular depolarization pattern. This approach may improve electrical synchrony and enhance left ventricular contraction compared to conventional simultaneous biventricular pacing. The aim of this study was to compare the acute, beat-to-beat effects of standard biventricular pacing versus fusion pacing on myocardial function, using both conventional and speckle-tracking echocardiography in heart failure patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB). Methods: In total, 27 heart failure patients (21 men and 6 women) with reduced ejection fraction (EF < 35%), left bundle branch block (QRS > 150 ms), and newly implanted CRT-D systems (Abbott) underwent echocardiographic assessment immediately after device implantation. Echocardiographic parameters—including left atrial strain, left ventricular strain, TAPSE, mitral and tricuspid valve function, and cardiac output—were measured at 5 min intervals under three different pacing conditions: pacing off, simultaneous biventricular pacing, and fusion pacing using Abbott’s SyncAV® algorithm. Results: In our study, CRT led to a significant shortening of the QRS duration from 169 ± 19 ms at baseline to 131 ± 17 ms with standard biventricular pacing, and further to 118 ± 16 ms with fusion pacing (p < 0.05). Despite the electrical improvement, no significant changes were observed in global longitudinal strain (GLS: −9.15 vs. −9.39 vs. −9.13; p = NS), left ventricular stroke volume (67.5 mL vs. 68.4 mL vs. 68.5 mL; p = NS), or left atrial parameters including strain, area, and ejection fraction. However, fusion pacing was associated with more homogeneous segmental strain patterns, improved aortic valve closure time, and enhanced right ventricular function as reflected by tissue Doppler-derived S’. Conclusions: Immediate QRS narrowing observed in CRT patients—particularly with fusion pacing optimization—is associated with a more homogeneous pattern of left ventricular contractility and improvements in selected measures of mechanical synchrony. However, these acute electrical changes do not translate into immediate improvements in stroke volume, global LV strain, or left atrial function. Longer-term follow-up is needed to determine whether the electrical benefits of CRT, especially with fusion pacing, lead to meaningful hemodynamic improvements. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Atrial Fibrillation Treatment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 2883 KiB  
Article
Trends and Outcomes of TAVR: An Analysis Using the National Inpatient Sample and Readmissions Database
by Vivek Joseph Varughese, Vignesh Krishnan Nagesh, Hadrian Hoang-Vu Tran, Olivia Yessin, Harsh Jha, Ashley Mason, Audrey Thu, Simcha Weissman and Adam Atoot
Diseases 2025, 13(5), 149; https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases13050149 - 13 May 2025
Viewed by 659
Abstract
Background: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become the preferred treatment for severe aortic stenosis in high- and intermediate-risk patients, with expanding indications for lower-risk populations. However, post-procedural complications, such as stroke, conduction disturbances, and heart failure readmissions, remain concerns. The aim [...] Read more.
Background: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become the preferred treatment for severe aortic stenosis in high- and intermediate-risk patients, with expanding indications for lower-risk populations. However, post-procedural complications, such as stroke, conduction disturbances, and heart failure readmissions, remain concerns. The aim of our study is to analyze the national trends in TAVR procedures, in-hospital outcomes, major readmission causes, and the association of risk factors for readmissions following TAVR. Methods: We analyzed NIS data (2018–2022) to assess TAVR utilization trends, patient demographics, and in-hospital outcomes. The NRD (2021–2022) was used to evaluate 60-day readmission rates for stroke, complete heart block, and heart failure. Multivariate regression models were employed to identify risk factors having significant association with major readmission causes. Results: TAVR utilization increased from 10,788 cases in 2018 to 17,784 in 2022, with a concurrent decrease in in-hospital mortality (1.33% to 0.90%) and length of stay (3.88 to 2.97 days). Of 123,376 TAVR index admissions in 2021, 28,654 patients had 66,100 readmission events (53.57%) in the 60 days following discharge. Heart failure (17,566 cases, 26.57% of readmissions) was the most common readmission cause, followed by complete heart block (1760 cases, 2.66% of readmissions) and stroke (284 cases, 0.42% of readmissions). Predictors of post-TAVR stroke included uncontrolled hypertension (OR 2.29, p < 0.001) and chronic heart failure (OR 2.73, p < 0.001). Left bundle branch block (LBBB) was strongly associated with complete heart block (OR 12.89, p < 0.001) and heart failure readmissions (OR 7.65, p < 0.001). Conclusions: TAVR utilization has increased with improving perioperative outcomes, but post-TAVR readmissions remain significant, particularly for heart failure, stroke, and conduction disturbances. Pre-procedural uncontrolled hypertension, hyperlipidemia, congestive heart failure, and atrial fibrillation were risk factors with significant association with stroke in the 60 days following TAVR. The presence of documented pre-procedural LBB, RBB, as well as BFB were risk factors with significant association with complete heart block following TAVR placements. Pre-procedural LBB, RBB, BFB, and atrial fibrillation were risk factors having significant association with heart failure readmissions in the 60 days following TAVR. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 2206 KiB  
Review
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy and Conduction System Pacing
by Thomas Garvey O’Neill, Takahiro Tsushima and Bhupendar Tayal
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(9), 3212; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14093212 - 6 May 2025
Viewed by 897
Abstract
Left bundle branch block (LBBB), initially described in the early 20th century, has become increasingly recognized as one of the leading causes of advanced heart failure (HF). In addition to rapidly growing data on guideline-directed medical therapy, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) via transvenous [...] Read more.
Left bundle branch block (LBBB), initially described in the early 20th century, has become increasingly recognized as one of the leading causes of advanced heart failure (HF). In addition to rapidly growing data on guideline-directed medical therapy, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) via transvenous coronary sinus lead has been the gold-standard therapy, but one-third of the indicated patients do not receive the expected benefits. Recently, cardiac conduction system pacing (CSP) was identified as an alternative to traditional CRT strategy, and multiple data have been published during the last few years. This review will discuss the diagnostic criteria of LBBB and its relation to the development of HF and review available data for traditional CRT as well as CSP in depth. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Cardiac Resynchronization Treatment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 4977 KiB  
Review
Understanding LOT-CRT: Current Insights, Limitations, and Our Center’s Experience
by Georgios Leventopoulos, Kassiani-Maria Nastouli, Maria Bozika, Eleni Papastavrou, Anastasios Apostolos, Rafail Koros, Angelos Perperis, Ioanna Koniari, Niki Vlassopoulou, Panagiotis Chronopoulos, Christoforos K. Travlos, Athanasios Moulias and Periklis Davlouros
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(9), 3025; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14093025 - 27 Apr 2025
Viewed by 2428
Abstract
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) using biventricular (BiV) pacing is the standard treatment for heart failure (HF) patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and electrical dyssynchrony. However, one in three patients remains a non-responder. Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) could represent [...] Read more.
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) using biventricular (BiV) pacing is the standard treatment for heart failure (HF) patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and electrical dyssynchrony. However, one in three patients remains a non-responder. Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) could represent a more physiological alternative, but its effectiveness is limited in cases of atypical left bundle branch block (LBBB) or intraventricular conduction delay (IVCD). Left Bundle Branch Pacing Optimized cardiac resynchronization therapy (LOT-CRT) integrates LBBAP with coronary sinus (CS) lead pacing to improve electrical synchrony and clinical outcomes. This review evaluates the feasibility, advantages, disadvantages, and clinical outcomes of LOT-CRT. Additionally, we describe our center’s experience and propose an evidence-based implantation algorithm. A review of published studies investigating LOT-CRT was conducted, comparing its effectiveness with BiV-CRT and LBBAP alone using QRS narrowing, LVEF improvement, left ventricular remodeling, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class changes and NT-proBNP levels. It was found that LOT-CRT outperforms BiV-CRT or LBBAP alone in selected populations, at the cost of higher clinical skills, longer procedural times, and specific device setups. Randomized trials are underway to further define its role in clinical practice. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cardiology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 2103 KiB  
Article
A Prospective Pilot Study for Prognosis of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Super-Response Using Electrical and Mechanical Dyssynchrony Assessment in Patients with Heart Failure and Strauss Left Bundle Branch Block Criteria
by Tariel Atabekov, Andrey Smorgon, Anna Mishkina, Sergey Krivolapov, Svetlana Sazonova, Mikhail Khlynin, Roman Batalov and Sergey Popov
Life 2025, 15(4), 605; https://doi.org/10.3390/life15040605 - 5 Apr 2025
Viewed by 552
Abstract
Electrical and mechanical dyssynchrony (MD) underlies left ventricular (LV) contractile dysfunction in patients with heart failure (HF) and left bundle branch block (LBBB). In some cases, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) almost completely reverses LV contractile dysfunction. The LBBB electrocardiographic Strauss criteria and MD [...] Read more.
Electrical and mechanical dyssynchrony (MD) underlies left ventricular (LV) contractile dysfunction in patients with heart failure (HF) and left bundle branch block (LBBB). In some cases, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) almost completely reverses LV contractile dysfunction. The LBBB electrocardiographic Strauss criteria and MD assessment were proposed to improve CRT response. However, using these techniques separately does not improve LV contraction in 20–40% of patients after CRT device implantation. We aimed to evaluate whether the combined use of electrocardiography (ECG), speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE) and cardiac scintigraphy could improve the prognosis of CRT super-response in patients with HF and Strauss LBBB criteria during a 6-month follow-up period. The study prospectively included patients with HF, classified as New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class (FC) II–III in sinus rhythm with Strauss LBBB criteria and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Before and 6 months after CRT device implantation, ECG, STE and cardiac scintigraphy were performed. The study’s primary endpoint was the NYHA class improvement ≥ 1 and left ventricle end systolic volume decrease > 30% or LVEF improvement > 15% after 6 months of CRT. Based on collected data, we developed a prognostic model regarding the CRT super-response. Out of 54 (100.0%) patients, 39 (72.2%) had a CRT super-response. Patients with CRT super-response were likelier to have a greater S wave amplitude in V2 lead (p = 0.004), higher rates of global longitudinal strain (GLS) (p = 0.001) and interventricular delay (IVD) (p = 0.005). Only three indicators (S wave amplitude in V2 lead, GLS and IVD) were independently associated with CRT super-response in univariable and multivariable logistic regression. We created a prognostic model based on the logistic equation and calculated a cut-off value (>0.73). The resulting ROC curve revealed a discriminative ability with an AUC of 0.957 (sensitivity 87.2%; specificity 100.0%). The electrical and mechanical dyssynchrony assessment using ECG, STE and cardiac scintigraphy is useful in the prediction of CRT super-response in patients with HF and Strauss LBBB criteria during a 6-month follow-up period. Our prognostic model can identify patients who are super-responders to CRT. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Management of Ischemia and Heart Failure—2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 314 KiB  
Article
Left vs. Right Bundle Branch Block in COVID-19 Patients: Distinct Clinical Presentations and Prognostic Implications
by Elena Ciurariu, Mara Amalia Balteanu, Marius Georgescu, George Andrei Drăghici, Silviu Gabriel Vlăsceanu, Alina-Florina Șerb and Ramona Cioboată
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(7), 2310; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14072310 - 28 Mar 2025
Viewed by 914
Abstract
Background/Objectives: COVID-19 is associated with multiple systemic effects, including cardiovascular complications. However, its interplay with cardiac conduction abnormalities remains underexplored. We compared the clinical profile of COVID-19 patients with pre-existing left bundle branch block (LBBB) or right bundle branch block (RBBB) at [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: COVID-19 is associated with multiple systemic effects, including cardiovascular complications. However, its interplay with cardiac conduction abnormalities remains underexplored. We compared the clinical profile of COVID-19 patients with pre-existing left bundle branch block (LBBB) or right bundle branch block (RBBB) at hospital admission. Methods: This study included 100 COVID-19 patients with antecedent BBB (50 LBBB, 50 RBBB). Critical cardiometabolic, renal, hematological, and inflammatory markers were measured. Logistic regression was used to identify key predictors differentiating COVID-19 patients with LBBB and RBBB. Spearman’s correlations were applied to assess intra-strata associations for these variables. Results: COVID-19 patients with LBBB patients were significantly more likely to display lower systolic blood pressure (p = 0.012) but greater left atrial size (p = 0.008), left ventricular diameter (p = 0.001), and interventricular septal thickness (p = 0.023). Hematological and inflammatory markers differed, with LBBB patients being prone to exhibit higher red cell distribution width (p = 0.005), lymphocyte count (p < 0.001), neutrophil count (p = 0.045), and C-reactive protein (p < 0.001). This group also tended to show lower erythrocyte sedimentation rate (p = 0.013) and glycated hemoglobin (p = 0.045) but higher random glucose (p = 0.014). Absolute lymphocyte count, C-reactive protein, and left ventricular diameter were the most robust predictors distinguishing LBBB from RBBB. Significant associations were found exclusively for LBBB, all of them being weak. These predominantly negative relationships indicated an inflammatory origin, and most of them occurred for lymphocyte count. Conclusions: COVID-19 patients with LBBB and RBBB present distinct clinical profiles at hospital admission. The former group demonstrates a more adverse baseline clinical profile, particularly in terms of cardiac and inflammatory markers. These findings suggest that pre-existing BBB type may influence disease progression, potentially helping in risk stratification for COVID-19 patients. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Infectious Diseases)
19 pages, 3137 KiB  
Article
The Relationship Between the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire and Electrocardiographic Parameters in Predicting Outcomes After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
by Andrei-Mihnea Rosu, Luminita-Florentina Tomescu, Theodor-Georgian Badea, Emanuel-Stefan Radu, Andreea-Liana Rosu, Lavinia-Nicoleta Brezeanu, Maria-Daniela Tanasescu, Sebastian Isac, Teodora Isac, Oana-Andreea Popa and Crina-Julieta Sinescu
Life 2024, 14(12), 1564; https://doi.org/10.3390/life14121564 - 28 Nov 2024
Viewed by 919
Abstract
Background: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an essential treatment for patients with symptomatic heart failure and ventricular conduction abnormalities. Low-ejection-fraction (EF) cardiomyopathy often involves a wide QRS complex displaying a left bundle branch block (LBBB) morphology and markedly delayed activation of the LV [...] Read more.
Background: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an essential treatment for patients with symptomatic heart failure and ventricular conduction abnormalities. Low-ejection-fraction (EF) cardiomyopathy often involves a wide QRS complex displaying a left bundle branch block (LBBB) morphology and markedly delayed activation of the LV lateral wall. Following CRT, patients with heart failure and LBBB have better outcomes and quality-of-life improvements. Various electrocardiographic and clinical parameters are thought to be able to predict this improvement. The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) is a reliable tool for measuring these patients’ quality of life. Methods: This is an observational prospective study featuring over 69 individuals diagnosed with cardiac failure and dilatative cardiomyopathy with low-EF and major LBBB. This study analyzed the correlations between patient outcomes and demographic, clinical, and electrocardiographic parameters. Results: Following the analysis, we observed correlations between the QRS area, intraprocedural systolic blood pressure, Q-LV interval, the R-wave amplitude in the right precordial leads and the CRT outcomes indicated by the KCCQ score. Conclusions: The parameters found and their correlation with the KCCQ score show how CRT therapy impacts patients’ quality of life, symptom burden, and functional status. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advancements in Heart Failure Research)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 600 KiB  
Article
Impact of Newly Diagnosed Left Bundle Branch Block on Long-Term Outcomes in Patients with STEMI
by Larisa Anghel, Cristian Stătescu, Radu Andy Sascău, Bogdan-Sorin Tudurachi, Andreea Tudurachi, Laura-Cătălina Benchea, Cristina Prisacariu and Rodica Radu
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(18), 5479; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13185479 - 15 Sep 2024
Viewed by 1778
Abstract
Background/Objectives: This study assessed the long-term prognostic implications of newly developed left bundle branch block (LBBB) in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and a single coronary lesion, following primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods: Among 3526 patients admitted with acute myocardial [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: This study assessed the long-term prognostic implications of newly developed left bundle branch block (LBBB) in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and a single coronary lesion, following primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods: Among 3526 patients admitted with acute myocardial infarction between January 2011 and December 2013, 42 were identified with STEMI, a single coronary lesion, and newly diagnosed LBBB. A control group of 42 randomly selected STEMI patients without LBBB was also included. All participants were prospectively evaluated with a median follow-up duration of 9.4 years. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were analyzed to assess the impact of LBBB on long-term outcomes. Results: The baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. The STEMI with new LBBB group had significantly higher rates of new myocardial infarction, revascularization, and mortality, highlighting the severe prognostic implications and elevated risk for adverse outcomes compared to STEMI without LBBB. The multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that the presence of LBBB (HR: 2.15, 95% CI: 1.28–3.62, p = 0.003), lower LVEF (HR: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.22–1.72, p < 0.001), and longer pain-to-admission time (HR: 1.32, 95% CI: 1.09–1.61, p = 0.008) were significant independent predictors of adverse outcomes. Conclusions: Newly acquired LBBB in STEMI patients is associated with poorer long-term outcomes. Early identification and management of factors such as reduced LVEF and timely hospital admission, specifically in patients with new-onset LBBB, can improve prognosis. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Management of Patients with Heart Failure)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 282 KiB  
Article
Evaluating Long-Term Outcomes in STEMI Patients with New Left Bundle Branch Block: The Impact of Modifiable Risk Factors
by Larisa Anghel, Bogdan-Sorin Tudurachi, Andreea Tudurachi, Laura-Cătălina Benchea, Alexandra Clement, Răzvan-Liviu Zanfirescu, Radu Andy Sascău and Cristian Stătescu
J. Pers. Med. 2024, 14(7), 771; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm14070771 - 19 Jul 2024
Viewed by 1846
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Coronary artery disease, a leading global cause of death, highlights the essential need for early detection and management of modifiable cardiovascular risk factors to prevent further coronary events. Methods: This study, conducted at a major tertiary academic PCI-capable hospital in [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Coronary artery disease, a leading global cause of death, highlights the essential need for early detection and management of modifiable cardiovascular risk factors to prevent further coronary events. Methods: This study, conducted at a major tertiary academic PCI-capable hospital in Romania from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2013, prospectively analyzed 387 myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation (STEMI) patients to assess the long-term management of modifiable risk factors. This study particularly focused on patients with new-onset left bundle branch block (LBBB) and compared them with a matched control group without LBBB. Results: During median follow-up periods of 9.6 years for LBBB patients and 9.2 years for those without LBBB, it was found that smoking, obesity, and dyslipidemia were prevalent in 73.80%, 71.42%, and 71.42% of the LBBB group, respectively, at baseline. Significant reductions in smoking were observed in both groups, with the LBBB group’s smoking rates decreasing significantly to 61.90% (p = 0.034). Patients with LBBB more frequently achieved low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLc) target levels during the follow-up period (from 71.42% to 59.52%; p = 0.026) compared to the control group (from 66.67% to 71.42%; p = 0.046). Prescription rates for dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), beta-blockers, and statins were initially high but then decreased by the follow-up. Statin use was reduced from 97.62% to 69.04% (p = 0.036) in the LBBB group and from 100% to 61.90% (p = 0.028) in the non-LBBB group. This study also highlighted moderate correlations between obesity (r = 0.627, p = 0.040) and subsequent coronary reperfusion in the LBBB group, while dyslipidemia and smoking showed very strong positive correlations across both groups (dyslipidemia: r = 0.903, p = 0.019 for LBBB; r = 0.503, p = 0.048 for non-LBBB; smoking: r = 0.888, p = 0.035 for LBBB; r = 0.517, p = 0.010 for non-LBBB). Conclusions: These findings underscore the crucial need for targeted management of modifiable risk factors, particularly focusing on dyslipidemia and smoking cessation, to improve subsequent coronary reperfusion outcomes post-STEMI, especially in patients with complicating factors like LBBB. Full article
10 pages, 520 KiB  
Article
Right Bundle Branch Block Predicts Appropriate Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Therapies in Patients with Non-Ischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy and a Prophylactic Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator
by Marta Jiménez-Blanco Bravo, Gonzalo Luis Alonso Salinas, Carolina Parra Esteban, Jorge Toquero Ramos, Miguel Amores Luque, Jose Luis Zamorano Gómez, Eusebio García-Izquierdo, Jesús Álvarez-García, Ignacio Fernández Lozano and Víctor Castro Urda
Diagnostics 2024, 14(11), 1173; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14111173 - 1 Jun 2024
Viewed by 1084
Abstract
Background: The benefit of prophylactic implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) in patients with severe systolic dysfunction of non-ischemic origin is still unclear, and the identification of patients at risk for sudden cardiac death remains a major challenge. Aims/Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all consecutive patients [...] Read more.
Background: The benefit of prophylactic implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) in patients with severe systolic dysfunction of non-ischemic origin is still unclear, and the identification of patients at risk for sudden cardiac death remains a major challenge. Aims/Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all consecutive patients with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (NICM) who underwent prophylactic ICD implantation between 2008 and 2020 in two tertiary centers. Our main goal was to identify the predictors of appropriate ICD therapies (anti-tachycardia pacing [ATP] and/or shocks) in this cohort of patients. Results: A total of 224 patients were included. After a median follow-up of 51 months, 61 patients (27.2%) required appropriate ICD therapies. Patients with appropriate ICD therapies were more frequently men (87% vs. 69%, p = 0.006), of younger age (59 years, (53–65) vs. 64 years, (57–70); p = 0.02), showed more right bundle branch blocks (RBBBs) (15% vs. 4%, p = 0.007) and less left bundle branch blocks (LBBBs) (26% vs. 47%, p = 0.005) in the ECG, and had higher left ventricular end-diastolic (100 mL/m2, (90–117) vs. 86, (71–110); p = 0.011) and systolic volumes (72 mL/m2, (59–87) vs. 61, (47–81), p = 0.05). In a multivariate competing-risks regression analysis, RBBB (HR 2.26, CI 95% 1.02–4.98, p = 0.043) was identified as an independent predictor of appropriate ICD therapies. Conclusion: RBBBs may help to identify patients with NICM at high risk of ventricular arrhythmias and requiring ICD intervention. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cardiovascular Diseases: Diagnosis and Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 813 KiB  
Article
The Role of TOMM40 in Cardiovascular Mortality and Conduction Disorders: An Observational Study
by Giuseppe Di Stolfo, Sandra Mastroianno, Nicolò Soldato, Raimondo Salvatore Massaro, Giovanni De Luca, Davide Seripa, Maria Urbano, Carolina Gravina, Antonio Greco, Paola Siena, Marco Matteo Ciccone, Andrea Igoren Guaricci, Cinzia Forleo, Massimo Carella and Domenico Rosario Potenza
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(11), 3177; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13113177 - 29 May 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1443
Abstract
Aims: TOMM40 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs2075650 consists of allelic variation c.275-31A > G and it has been linked to Alzheimer disease, apolipoprotein and cholesterol levels and other risk factors. However, data on its role in cardiovascular disorders are lacking. The first [...] Read more.
Aims: TOMM40 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs2075650 consists of allelic variation c.275-31A > G and it has been linked to Alzheimer disease, apolipoprotein and cholesterol levels and other risk factors. However, data on its role in cardiovascular disorders are lacking. The first aim of the study is to evaluate mortality according to TOMM40 genotype in a cohort of selected patients affected by advanced atherosclerosis. Second aim was to investigate the relationship between Xg and AA alleles and the presence of conduction disorders and implantation of defibrillator (ICD) or pacemaker (PM) in our cohort. Materials and Methods: We enrolled 276 patients (mean age 70.16 ± 7.96 years) affected by hemodynamic significant carotid stenosis and/or ischemia of the lower limbs of II or III stadium Fontaine. We divided the population into two groups according to the genotype (Xg and AA carriers). We evaluated several electrocardiographic and echocardiographic parameters, including heart rate, rhythm, presence of right and left bundle branch block (LBBB and RBBB), PR interval, QRS duration and morphology, QTc interval, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). We clinically followed these patients for 82.53 ± 30.02 months and we evaluated the incidence of cardiovascular events, number of deaths and PM/ICD implantations. Results: We did not find a difference in total mortality between Xg and AA carriers (16.3 % vs. 19.4%; p = 0.62). However, we found a higher mortality for fatal cardiovascular events in Xg carriers (8.2% vs. 4.4%; HR = 4.53, 95% CI 1.179–17.367; p = 0.04) with respect to AA carriers. We noted a higher percentage of LBBB in Xg carriers (10.2% vs. 3.1%, p = 0.027), which was statistically significant. Presence of right bundle branch block (RBBB) was also higher in Xg (10.2% vs. 4.4%, p = 0.10), but without reaching statistically significant difference compared to AA patients. We did not observe significant differences in heart rate, presence of sinus rhythm, number of device implantations, PR and QTc intervals, QRS duration and LVEF between the two groups. At the time of enrolment, we observed a tendency for device implant in Xg carriers at a younger age compared to AA carriers (58.50 ± 0.71 y vs. 72.14 ± 11.11 y, p = 0.10). During the follow-up, we noted no statistical difference for new device implantations in Xg respect to AA carriers (8.2% vs. 3.5%; HR = 2.384, 95% CI 0.718–7.922; p = 0.156). The tendency to implant Xg at a younger age compared to AA patients was confirmed during follow-up, but without reaching a significant difference(69.50 ± 2.89 y vs. 75.63 ± 8.35 y, p = 0.074). Finally, we pointed out that Xg carriers underwent device implantation 7.27 ± 4.43 years before AA (65.83 ± 6.11 years vs. 73.10 ± 10.39 years) and that difference reached a statistically significant difference (p = 0.049) when we considered all patients, from enrollment to follow-up. Conclusions: In our study we observed that TOMM40 Xg patients affected by advanced atherosclerosis have a higher incidence of developing fatal cardiovascular events, higher incidence of LBBB and an earlier age of PM or ICD implantations, as compared to AA carriers. Further studies will be needed to evaluate the genomic contribution of TOMM40 SNPs to cardiovascular deaths and cardiac conduction diseases. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop