Search Results (11)

Background/Objectives: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction stabilizes the knee and treats associated lesions. Control of rotational laxity can be optimized by an extra-articular plasty, historically known as the Lemaire plasty or tenodesis at the fascia lata. The risk of iterative rupture is reduced, by stabilising anterior translation and tibial internal rotation. In the literature, many different technical details are described, for example regarding the position and the method of femoral fixation. Although these parameters are fundamental to achieving graft isometry and avoiding overconstraint, no consensus or standardized recommendations have yet been established. The aim of the study was to summarize the position of fixation of a lateral tenodesis to the fascia lata, the degrees of flexion and rotation during fixation, its mode of fixation and its passage in relation to the lateral collateral ligament (LCL). Methods: In April 2024, a systematic review was conducted by two independent authors to identify studies describing lateral tenodesis with fascia lata with details about femoral fixation position, method of fixation, the graft’s passage relative to the lateral collateral ligament and flexion/rotation during fixation. From 111 records initially identified, 22 studies met the inclusion criteria. Results: Most authors described passing the graft beneath the LCL to achieve controlled anisometry. The preferred femoral fixation point was proximal and posterior to the lateral epicondyle, with fixation performed at approximately 30° of flexion and neutral tibial rotation. Various fixation methods have been reported, including staples, screws, cortical buttons, and anchors, but no biomechanical evidence demonstrated the superiority of one technique over another. Conclusions: Lateral tenodesis at the fascia lata is a well-established adjunct to ACL reconstruction, providing additional control of rotational laxity. While consistent trends are emerging regarding graft passage and femoral fixation landmarks, technical heterogeneity persists, and no definitive guidelines currently exist. Standardization of these parameters through high-level clinical and biomechanical studies is warranted to optimize outcomes and reduce variability in surgical practice. Full article

Background/Objectives: The aim was to provide a comprehensive, systematic review on the Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis (LET) methods used in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in the light of recent data. Methods: To identify all of the essential studies that reported relevant data concerning primary outcomes: indications for surgery, surgical technique, graft type, fixation method, and tibial fixation location, an extensive search of the major and significant electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane Central, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, Embase) was performed by three independent authors. A systematic investigation was conducted in November 2023, with no limits regarding the year of publication. After the database search, three independent reviewers screened all the papers, which followed strictly the inclusion and exclusion criteria, identifying a title, abstract, and full text concerning LET, surgical technique, femoral attachment, tibial attachment, graft type, fixation method, knee angle during fixation, and graft tension at fixation in ACL reconstruction. A systematic review of the collected literature was carried out according to the guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Results: Of the 35 papers reviewed, seven surgical techniques of LET differing in the way the procedure was performed were separated. The majority of papers were from Italy (n = 11), USA (n = 3), France (n = 3), and Canada (n = 3). The number of total participants across all studies was 6253. The majority of studies (17 papers) used the Lemaire modified procedure, and 10 papers used the MacIntosh technique modified by the Coker–Arnold approach. Most of the papers mentioned fixation location on the lateral distal part of the femur including six articles referring directly to lateral femoral epicondyle. Most authors (25 papers) defined tibial attachment as Gerdy’s tubercle. The most common graft was the iliotibial band and fixation method was sutures. The types of fixation in the surgical techniques of the collected papers were Sutures, Staples, Anchor, Interference screw, K-wire, Bioabsorbable Screw and Titanium Screw with a serrated polyethylene washer. Conclusions: Despite variability in technique, the Lemaire-modified procedure emerged as the preferred approach for Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis, suggesting a general consensus around its reliability and reproducibility in clinical practice. The frequent use of the iliotibial band as graft material reflects its accessibility and suitability for reinforcing anterolateral stability. Similarly, the consistent use of sutures and fixation at Gerdy’s tubercle may indicate a favorable balance between technical ease and biomechanical strength. The variability in femoral fixation points—either at the lateral femoral condyle or epicondyle—highlights the ongoing debate or surgeon preference, underscoring the need for further comparative studies to establish optimal fixation strategy. Collectively, these patterns may help guide surgical decision-making, particularly when tailoring procedures to individual patient anatomy or surgical expertise. Full article

Aim of the Study: To determine whether adding a lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) to primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) lowers graft-failure risk and improves functional recovery in competitive athletes with high-grade pivot-shift. Methods: Multicentre retrospective cohort with 1:1 propensity-score matching (age, sex, sport, graft, centre). Competitive athletes with pivot-shift grade ≥ 2 who underwent primary ACLR with hamstring or bone–patellar tendon–bone (BPTB) autografts (2018–2024) were eligible. The primary outcome was graft failure within 24 months (composite of revision ACLR, symptomatic rotatory laxity with pivot-shift ≥ 2 plus KT-1000 > 5 mm, or MRI-confirmed rupture). Time-to-event was summarised with Kaplan–Meier (KM) curves and log-rank tests. Secondary outcomes included residual rotatory laxity and functional performance (single-leg hop, side hop, Y-Balance) analysed as the proportion achieving Limb Symmetry Index ≥ 90% at 6 and 24 months and as continuous LSI means. Two-sided α = 0.05; secondary outcomes were prespecified without multiplicity adjustment. Results: Of 1368 ACL reconstructions screened, 97 eligible athletes were identified; 92 were analysed after matching (46 isolated ACLR; 46 ACLR + LET; mean follow-up 30.0 ± 4.2 months). KM survival at 24 months was 95.7% after ACLR + LET versus 82.6% after isolated ACLR (log-rank p = 0.046). The absolute risk reduction was 13.0% (Number Needed to Treat 8; 95% CI 4→∞). In graft-type subgroups, failures were 6/32 vs. 1/30 for hamstring and 2/14 vs. 1/16 for BPTB (ACLR vs. ACLR + LET, respectively); there was no evidence of interaction (Breslow–Day p = 0.56). At 6 months, a higher proportion of ACLR + LET athletes achieved LSI ≥ 90% across tests—single-leg hop 77.8% vs. 40.9% (p = 0.0005), side hop 62.2% vs. 34.9% (p = 0.012), Y-Balance 84.4% vs. 59.1% (p = 0.010), with a larger mean LSI (between-group differences +8.2 to +9.1, all p < 0.001). By 24 months, threshold attainment largely converged (all p ≥ 0.06), while mean LSI differences persisted but were smaller (+3.9 to +4.9, all p ≤ 0.001). Conclusion: In competitive athletes with high-grade pivot-shift undergoing accelerated, criteria-based rehabilitation, adding LET to primary ACLR was associated with lower graft-failure risk and earlier functional symmetry, with consistent effects across hamstring and BPTB autografts. Given the observational design, causal inference is limited; confirmation in randomized and longer-term studies is warranted. Full article

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with concurrent lateral extra-articular tenodesis enhances rotational stability. However, not many studies describe radiological features following the abovementioned procedure. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the visibility and describe the sonographic morphology of the iliotibial band strip harvested during the modified Lemaire technique and to establish a correlation between these findings and clinical outcomes. Thirty-two consecutive patients underwent primary or revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the addition of lateral extra-articular tenodesis by the mini-open modified Lemaire technique. All individuals completed the following preoperative and postoperative questionnaires: the KOOS-pain, KOOS-symptoms, KOOS-ADL, KOOS-sport, KOOS-quality, IKDC, Lysholm, and WOMAC. Each patient underwent a postoperative ultrasound examination to evaluate the lateral extra-articular procedure, especially the harvested iliotibial band strip. The most common ultrasound findings of the iliotibial band strip were its hyperechoic appearance (87.1%), location at the level of the femur (58.1%), no surrounding effusion (83.9%), and no power Doppler signal (100%). Effusion seen in sonographic images was correlated with KOOS-symptoms postoperative scores (p = 0.0115). However, there were no correlations between other iliotibial band strip sonographic features and clinical outcomes. The functional score value increased in each patient compared to preoperative measurements. This is the first study that evaluated the sonographic features of the iliotibial band strip after the lateral extra-articular procedure by the mini-open modified Lemaire technique. Our study indicates that ultrasonography is a useful tool in identifying the iliotibial band strip after the mentioned procedure. Effusion observed around the strip on ultrasound was significantly associated with worse KOOS-symptoms scores, suggesting potential clinical relevance. Full article

Background and Objectives: The present systematic review investigated the efficacy of lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) and anterolateral ligament (ALL) as lateral extra-articular procedures (LEAPs) for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. ACL reconstruction using LEAP may reduce graft rupture and rotatory laxity and allow a quicker return to sports. The outcomes of interest were patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), return to sport, laxity, failure rate, and safety profile. Materials and Methods: The present systematic review followed the 2020 PRISMA guidelines. In December 2024, PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science were accessed without constraints. All clinical investigations evaluating LEAP for ACL reconstruction were considered. Only studies that considered LET and ALL as LEAP were considered. Only studies using a hamstring tendon autograft associated with LET or ALL were considered. Results: Data from 27 clinical studies (3423 patients) were retrieved. The mean length of follow-up was 61.8 ± 39.5 months. ACL reconstruction using LEAP led to a statistically significant improvement in the Lysholm score (p < 0.01) and IKDC (p < 0.01). The mean joint laxity, as measured by the arthrometer, was 1.5 ± 1.8 mm. Finally, 72.3% (623 of 668) of patients returned to their pre-injury level of sport at a mean of 6.3 ± 4.4 months. At the last follow-up, the LET group showed greater IKDC (p = 0.04). On the other hand, there was a statistically significant greater rate of patients positive to the Lachman test (p < 0.01), return to sport (p < 0.01), and reoperation (p = 0.01). No significant differences were found in Lysholm scores (p = 0.6), Tegner scores (p = 0.2), arthrometer measurements (p = 0.2), Pivot shift test results (p = 0.1), time to return to sport (p = 0.3), and failure rates (p = 0.7). Conclusions: LEAP for ACL reconstructions seems to be effective and safe. Most patients returned to their pre-injury level of sport after a mean of 6 months. LET-based ACL reconstruction may be associated with greater clinical outcomes and a higher reoperation rate compared to ALL-based reconstruction. Full article

Background/Objectives: Lateral extraarticular tenodesis (LET) has been advocated in revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) to improve knee stability and furthermore, decrease failure rates. The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes, knee laxity, and failure rates after revision ACLR with LET (ACLR + LET) versus without LET. It was hypothesized that ACLR + LET improves clinical outcomes and reduces the failure rate. Methods: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was conducted to examine patients who underwent revision ACLR with and without LET between 2017 and 2021 with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. Patients with coronal malalignment (>5°), posterior tibial slope >12°, and concomitant injuries to collateral ligaments were excluded. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) included the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee score, the Lysholm score, and the Tegner activity scale (TAS). Anterior knee laxity was measured with a Rolimeter and side-to-side difference (SSD) was determined. Revision ACLR failure was defined as ACL revision surgery and SSD > 5 mm. Group comparisons were performed using chi-square-, independent-samples students t-test or Mann–Whitney–U tests. Results: Of 56 eligible patients, 45 (80%, follow up, 23 isolated rACLR vs. 22 rACLR + LET) were included with a mean follow-up of 45.6 ± 15.8 months. Postoperative PROMs were not statistically different between rACLR and rACLR + LET groups (IKDC: 73.0 ± 18.9 vs. 68.7 ± 16.6, n.s.; Lysholm: 84.8 ± 12.3 vs. 77.7 ± 16.2, n.s.). Both groups showed similar TAS (rACLR vs. rACLR +LET (5; range 4–6 vs. 4; range 3–5; n.s.). Anterior knee laxity SSD was 2.4 ± 1.3 mm in the rACLR group and 1.8 ± 1.8 mm in the rACLR + LET group (n.s.). The failure rate was 13% in the rACLR group compared to 4.5% in the rACLR + LET group (n.s.). Conclusions: Isolated revision ACLR showed comparable postoperative patient-reported outcome measures and anterior knee laxity compared to ACLR + LET at mid-term follow up. The addition of a LET demonstrated a lower, though non-significant, failure rate after revision surgery. However, future studies with a prospective, randomized design and an increased number of patients are needed to clearly identify the exact indication for the use of additional LET. Full article

Traditional lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) using fixation elements constrains medial knee rotation laxity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLr). However, the mechanical behavior of an LET made with an iliotibial band–intermuscular septum is unknown using different anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction drillings and would be crucial for constraining the rotatory components of direction change movements. Thus, this study aimed to explore the maximum principal stresses and their distribution in grafts during medial knee rotation with and without iliotibial band–intermuscular septum lateral extra-articular tenodesis for the transtibial technique (TT), hybrid transtibial technique (HTT), and anteromedial portal technique (AM) in single-bundle ACLr. The maximum von Mises principal stresses and their distribution under medial knee rotation were described using a finite element model generated from a healthy knee. LET with HTT, TT, and AM decreases stress by 97%, 93%, and 86% during medial rotation compared to each technique without LET, respectively. The stress concentration for the AM portal and TT techniques was located at the femoral tunnel, and for HTT with LET, it was located across the distal thirds of the anterior aspect of the graft. In conclusion, the HTT with LET diminishes graft stress more than the HTT, TT, and AM without LET, and the TT and AM with LET during medial knee rotation. The AM portal, HTT, and TT techniques without LET show higher stress concentration patterns at the femoral tunnel, establishing a biomechanical risk of femoral tunnel enlargement when LET is not performed. Full article

(1) Purpose: The incidence of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures in children and adolescents has considerably increased during the last decades due to higher levels of competitive athletic activity, and early sport specialization and professionalization. Contemporary ACL reconstruction techniques have recently been subject to renewed interest in this population. The objective of this study is to report the short- and mid-term results of our physis-sparing ACL reconstruction technique using an “over the top” technique associated with a modified Lemaire procedure. (2) Methods: A retrospective series of 12 junior soccer players who presented to our clinic with a torn ACL between January 2019 and September 2021 was reviewed. The inclusion criteria were patients under 15 years with open tibial and femoral physes, with a stable contralateral knee, a minimum follow-up of 6 months, and a time frame from injury to surgery of <3 months. Patients with previous knee surgery, structural concomitant injuries, muscular, neurological, or vascular abnormalities, or hypersensitivity to metal alloys were excluded. The functional evaluation was performed using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) rating, Lysholm score, and Tegner activity level. Moreover, clinical and radiological assessments were also performed, including KT-1000 and knee X-rays. (3) Results: We identified 1 female and 11 male patients with ACL tears, with a mean age of 13.17 ± 0.9 months. Concomitant injuries include isolated vertical and bucket-handle tears of the medial meniscus, lateral meniscus tears, bilateral tear of both menisci. The mean follow-up time was 26 ± 12.6 months. The average IKDC, Lysholm and Tegner scores were 93.29 ± 11.04, 95.08 ± 13.2 and 9 ± 0.0 points, respectively. The average KT-1000 score of the participants was 0.96 ± 1.6 points. None of the included patients reported post-surgical complications or required additional surgeries. (4) Conclusions: Our novel ACL reconstruction with LET technique is a safe procedure that resulted in good clinical outcomes, lower failure rate and return to sports in skeletally immature patients. Full article

Background: The lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) procedure associated with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction can be considered in selected patients to diminish the risk of persistent rotatory instability and achieve a protective effect on the graft. Several techniques have been described in the literature to treat rotatory instability. Usually, a strip of the iliotibial band (ITB) is harvested from its middle while leaving the distal insertion, then passed underneath the lateral collateral ligament and fixed on the lateral aspect of the distal femur with various fixation methods such as staples, screws, anchors or extracortical suspensory devices. Despite their effectiveness, these fixation methods may be associated with complications such as lateral pain, over-constraint and tunnel convergence. Methods: This study presents a detailed surgical description of a new technique to perform an LET during ACL reconstruction with any type of graft fixing the ITB strip with the sutures of the ACL femoral button, comparing its pros and cons in relation to similar techniques found in the literature. Conclusions: This technique represents a reproducible, easy to learn and inexpensive solution to perform a lateral extra-articular tenodesis associated with an ACL reconstruction using the high-resistance sutures of the femoral button. Full article

Despite remarkable advances in the clinical outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions (ACLRs), residual rotational instability of the knee joint remains a major concern. Since the anterolateral ligament (ALL) on the knee joint has been “rediscovered”, the role of anterolateral structures, including ALL and deep iliotibial band, as secondary stabilizers of anterolateral rotatory instability has gained interest. This interest has led to the resurgence of anterolateral procedures combined with ACLRs to restore rotational stability in patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficiencies. However, the difference in concepts between anterolateral ligament reconstructions (ALLRs) as anatomical reconstruction and lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LETs) as non-anatomical reinforcement has been conflicting in present literature. This study aimed to review the anatomy and biomechanics of anterolateral structures, surgical techniques, and the clinical outcomes of anterolateral procedures, including LET and ALLR, in patients with ACL deficiencies. Full article

Injuries to the knee ligaments can be particularly disabling in young patients, given the risk of long-term disability if adequate fixation is not achieved during initial repair. The TWINFIX™ titanium (Ti) suture anchor with ULTRABRAID™ Suture (Smith and Nephew, London, UK) was designed to secure tendon and ligament reconstructions with increased boney ingrowth at the anchor site with minimal invasive technique. This retrospective analysis looked at 33 patients (41 implants) operated with this device between 2015 and 2019 at a single institution. The average age of patients was 33.18 years (standard deviation [SD], 15.26), with an average body mass index of 24.88 (SD, 3.49). The indications were lateral extra-articular tenodesis during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction, quadriceps or patellar tendon repair and medial collateral ligament repair. After an average follow up of 24.3 + 6.53 months, there was no reports of clinical failure or radiographic evidence of implant failure or loosening. One patient experienced a complication unrelated to the study device, requiring manipulation under anesthesia with resolution of symptoms. This case series supports the safety and performance of this implants for the knee procedures in which its use is indicated. Additional follow-up will be required to determine whether these effects are sustained at medium- and long-term durations. Full article