Search Results (44)

Background: Although anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody-based regimens are standard care for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM), direct comparative efficacy and comprehensive real-world safety data remain scarce. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Efficacy was assessed using hazard ratios (HRs) for progression-free survival and odds ratios (ORs) for response rates, with treatment rankings evaluated by Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking (SUCRA) values. Separately, adverse event reports for daratumumab, bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (D_VRd) regimens were extracted from the US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) (Q1 2015–Q2 2025). Statistical analyses were performed using R (4.3.3) and STATA (16.0). Results: The NMA included 33 RCTs. For the primary efficacy endpoints, compared to the standard bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRd) regimen, both D_VRd (OR = 3.21, 95% CI: 2.46–4.26; HR = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.38–0.63) and isatuximab plus VRd (Isa_VRd) (OR = 1.71, 95% CI: 1.25–2.32; HR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.51–0.85) regimens demonstrated superior efficacy. Subsequent pharmacovigilance analysis of D_VRd identified 11,714 FAERS reports, yielding 197 significant adverse drug event signals (64 unlabeled). These signals primarily affected elderly males and showed a bimodal distribution pattern. Conclusions: Combination regimens containing anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies demonstrate superiority in achieving deep remission and survival benefits, with D_VRd and Isa_VRd regimens showing particularly outstanding performance. However, efficacy and safety profiles vary across different combination regimens. Real-world data analysis further indicates that the D_VRd regimen carries several safety risk signals that remain underappreciated and exhibits a bimodal time distribution pattern. These findings provide new evidence to guide clinical decision-making and risk-stratified monitoring. Full article

Thrombosis is a common complication in multiple myeloma (MM) patients treated with immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs), including thalidomide, lenalidomide, and pomalidomide. When combined with anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies, these agents are highly effective but may increase thrombotic events (TE), potentially delaying therapy. This exploratory, hypothesis-generating analysis, conducted within the MMVision mono-institutional prospective study, included 53 MM patients who initiated IMiD plus anti-CD38 therapy between May 2021 and December 2022 (median follow-up: 18 months). Treatment regimens comprised lenalidomide (n = 36) or thalidomide (n = 15) with daratumumab, and pomalidomide (n = 2) with isatuximab. Most patients (n = 38) received frontline therapy, and all were given thromboprophylaxis according to guidelines, mainly aspirin (73%). Five patients (9.4%) developed VTE after a median of 48 days, managed with short-term low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). Exploratory analysis of 27 clinical/laboratory parameters suggested possible associations between VTE and low levels of beta-2 microglobulin, ferritin, intact/free lambda light chains, and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio. Notably, four of the five VTEs occurred in patients without lytic bone disease, typically associated with bone-driven inflammation in MM. Although all patients received aspirin prophylaxis from treatment initiation, it remains unclear whether thrombosis would also have occurred among those with higher inflammatory burden. These preliminary observations may indicate that in patients with relatively lower inflammation, aspirin prophylaxis could be less effective, potentially favoring VTE onset. In two VTE cases, cytokine profiling showed decreased M-CSF, SCLF-β, and MIP-1α, with increased G-CSF, raising the hypothesis of distinct immune-inflammatory pathways contributing to TEs. Given the limited number of patients and thrombotic events, and the cytokine data available for only two VTE cases, these associations should be regarded as exploratory and interpreted with caution. Overall, these exploratory findings warrant validation in larger, independent cohorts and may help generate hypotheses on how inflammatory signatures influence thrombotic risk and prophylaxis efficacy in MM patients receiving IMiD/anti-CD38-based regimens. Full article

Background: This meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy and safety of isatuximab, an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody, in combination regimens for newly diagnosed (NDMM) and relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Methods: We systematically searched major databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing isatuximab-based therapy with standard regimens up to September 2025. Efficacy and safety analyses were performed separately for NDMM and RRMM populations using random-effects models. Efficacy outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), very good partial response (VGPR) or better, and minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity rate. Safety was assessed by grade ≥ 3 adverse events. Results: In NDMM patients, isatuximab significantly improved PFS (HR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.52–0.84, p = 0.001) and MRD negativity rates (RR = 1.28, 95% CI: 1.13–1.45, p < 0.001), but not OS (HR = 1.01, p = 0.937), ORR (RR = 1.02, p = 0.49), or VGPR or better (RR = 1.10, p = 0.13). In RRMM patients, isatuximab significantly improved PFS (HR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.50–0.74, p < 0.001) and showed strong trends favoring OS (HR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.65–1.00, p = 0.051) and ORR (RR = 1.30, 95% CI: 0.79–2.16, p = 0.303), while significantly increasing MRD negativity (RR = 4.37, 95% CI: 0.60–31.68, p = 0.144). A trend toward improved OS was observed in RRMM (HR = 0.81, p = 0.051). In NDMM, PFS benefit was significant for standard-risk but not high-risk cytogenetics. Safety analysis showed an increased risk of grade ≥ 3 adverse events RRMM (RR = 1.18, p < 0.001) but not in NDMM (RR = 1.08, p = 0.064), primarily driven by neutropenia (NDMM RR = 1.96, p = 0.003; RRMM RR = 1.77, p = 0.039) and pneumonia in NDMM (RR = 1.80, p = 0.001). Conclusion: Isatuximab-based regimens significantly improve PFS and depth of response with a manageable safety profile, supporting its use across MM settings, though efficacy in NDMM may vary by cytogenetic risk. Full article

Background/Objectives: CD38-targeting monoclonal antibodies isatuximab and daratumumab have revolutionized multiple myeloma (MM) treatment, but a deeper understanding of their distinct mechanisms is crucial for therapeutic optimization. Methods: We used flow cytometry to assess isatuximab and daratumumab binding competition in MM cell lines and patient-derived bone marrow cells. The dynamics of CD38 expression were evaluated at different time points before and after antibody-mediated removal. The effects of IMiDs (pomalidomide, lenalidomide) on CD38 expression and isatuximab-induced apoptosis, either alone or in combination with IMiDs, were also examined. Moreover, MM cell migration was assessed through CXCR4-mediated assays, and cell adhesion was evaluated via CD49d-dependent assays. Results: Isatuximab and daratumumab did not compete for CD38 binding, confirming distinct epitope recognition. Following depletion with either antibody, CD38 expression on the MM cell surface began to recover within 2 h, suggesting a dynamic regulation of CD38 availability. While daratumumab lacked direct apoptosis, isatuximab induced significant direct cell death. Pomalidomide enhanced isatuximab-induced apoptosis by increasing CD38 expression, whereas lenalidomide had no significant effect. Additionally, both antibodies effectively inhibited MM cell migration and significantly reduced cell adhesion. Conclusions: Their non-competitive binding and shared impact on cell dynamics suggest opportunities for optimizing treatment strategies through combinatorial or sequential approaches in MM therapy. Full article

Background: In the randomized, phase-3 IKEMA trial, the triplet isatuximab, carfilzomib, and dexamethasone (IsaKd) demonstrated superior clinical benefit compared to those of carfilzomib and dexamethasone alone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma after 1–3 prior treatments. Methods: Our real-world, AENEID study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of IsaKd in patients who relapsed after frontline lenalidomide treatment, poorly represented in the IKEMA trial. Specifically, in the present multicenter analysis, we enrolled eighty-two patients who received, between April 2022 and September 2024 and outside of clinical trials, at least one cycle of IsaKd as a second-line treatment at the first relapse after induction therapy, autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), and lenalidomide maintenance. Results: After a median follow-up time of 12.9 months (range, 1–77), the overall response rate, at least a very good partial response rate, and median progression-free survival time were 79.3%, 56.1%, and 24.4 months, respectively. This slightly lower performance compared to that in the IKEMA study may be attributed to the well-known poor prognostic impact of lenalidomide refractoriness (len-R), developed by all our patients during maintenance therapy, and to a higher proportion of patients with extramedullary disease present in our series, which was identified as the only factor significantly affecting the PFS in multivariable analysis. The median overall survival was not reached, as in the pivotal trial, while the 1-year survival probability was 85.1%. Regarding the safety profile, our findings were consistent with those of the IKEMA trial, with no new safety signals reported. Conclusions: These real-world data support the use of IsaKd as a valuable option for len-R MM patients relapsing after the first-line therapy, including ASCT and lenalidomide maintenance. Full article

Minimal residual disease (MRD) evaluation is a recognized endpoint in clinical trials. Both next-generation flow and sequencing could be used as complementary techniques to detect myeloma cells after therapy to measure the depth of response and novel drug efficacy. Anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies combined with proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory drugs have increased the quality of response in myeloma patients, and MRD evaluation is also entering routine clinical practice in many hematological centers. This review analyzes updated results from recent clinical trials utilizing anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies such as isatuximab and daratumumab in terms of their responses and MRD data. MRD-driven therapy appears promising for the future of MM patients, and emerging minimally invasive techniques to assess MRD are under investigation as novel potential methods to replace or integrate traditional MRD evaluation. Full article

Multiple myeloma is a malignant hematological tumor characterized by the proliferation of clonal plasma cells in the bone marrow causing organ damage. Despite improved survival rates due to the increasing availability of therapeutic options in recent decades, it remains an incurable disease, with most patients ultimately relapsing. Consequently, relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma disease (RRMM) has become a treatment priority. Immunotherapy is the backbone of treatment in RRMM, starting with monoclonal antibodies such as elotuzumab, daratumumab, and isatuximab. The aim of this review is summarizing the results of RRMM trials with monoclonal antibodies and of the principal ongoing trials containing them. Additionally, we put a brief focus on novel drugs (such as bispecific antibodies) to provide a better overview. The advent of monoclonal antibodies has been nothing short of a game-changer for multi-refractory patients. It has opened up a whole new world of possibilities, offering myeloma patients a brighter and more hopeful future, even in the face of relapse. Full article

Background: The development of newer agents, including anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), has significantly improved overall survival (OS) in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). However, the treatment of older patients with RRMM who are transplant-ineligible remains challenging. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated OS in 78 transplant-ineligible patients with RRMM who were aged ≥ 65 years and treated at our institution between February 2012 and November 2023. Results: Unadjusted OS was significantly longer in the anti-CD38 mAb-exposed group (i.e., those previously treated with daratumumab and receiving isatuximab plus pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone because of disease progression during treatment with daratumumab [n = 6], daratumumab plus pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone [n = 9], or isatuximab plus pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone without daratumumab-exposure [n = 14]) than in the anti-CD38 mAb-naïve group (no exposure to daratumumab or isatuximab [n = 49]) (p < 0.001). To address potential confounder factors associated with use or nonuse of anti-CD38 mAbs, we performed propensity score matching (PSM) using age, sex, performance status, and Geriatric 8 and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living scores. PSM identified 14 subjects from the anti-CD38 mAb-exposed group with baseline characteristics similar to those of 14 subjects from the anti-CD38 mAb-naïve group. After PSM, the adjusted OS was significantly longer in the anti-CD38 mAb-exposed group than in the anti-CD38 mAb-naïve group (p < 0.001). Conclusion: These findings provide insights into the optimal use of anti-CD38 mAbs in patients with RRMM who are transplant-ineligible and aged ≥65 years and on candidates who are appropriate for novel approaches, such as chimeric antigen receptor T-cell or bispecific T-cell engager therapy. Full article

Background/Objectives: Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have revolutionized multiple myeloma (MM) treatment. However, post-marketing data on their neuropsychiatric safety are limited. This study aimed to evaluate neuropsychiatric adverse events (AEs) related to mAbs used for MM through a retrospective pharmacovigilance analysis using the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS) database. Methods: Individual case safety reports (ICSRs) from 2015 to 2023 with at least one neuropsychiatric AE and one of the MM-approved mAbs as the suspected drug (i.e., daratumumab, elotuzumab, isatuximab, belantamab mafodotin, teclistamab, elranatamab, and talquentamab) were analyzed using descriptive and disproportionality approaches. Results: Unknown signals of disproportionate reporting (SDR) included the following: cerebral infarction for daratumumab (n = 45; reporting odds ratio (ROR) = 2.39, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.79–3.21; information component (IC) = 1.54, IC₀₂₅–IC₀₇₅ = 1.05–1.9), elotuzumab (25; 7.61, 5.13–11.28; 3.03, 2.37–3.51), and isatuximab (10; 2.56, 1.38–4.76; 1.67, 0.59–2.4); mental status changes for daratumumab (40; 2.66, 1.95–3.63; 1.67, 1.14–2.04) and belantamab mafodotin (10; 4.23, 2.28–7.88; 2.3, 1.22–3.03); an altered state of consciousness for daratumumab (32; 1.97, 1.39–2.78; 1.32, 0.73–1.74) and belantamab mafodotin (6; 2.35, 1.05–5.23; 1.6, 0.19–2.52); Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS) for daratumumab (23; 6.42, 4.26–9.69; 2.81, 2.11–3.3), isatuximab (8; 10.72, 5.35–21.48; 3.57, 2.35–4.37), and elotuzumab (3; 4.74, 1.53–14.7; 2.59, 0.52–3.8); and orthostatic intolerance for daratumumab (10; 12.54, 6.71–23.43; 3.75, 2.67–4.48) and elotuzumab (4; 28.31, 10.58–75.73; 5, 3.24–6.08). Conclusions: Our analysis highlighted several previously unacknowledged SDRs for MM-approved mAbs. Given the complex and not entirely understood etiology of some neuropsychiatric AEs, including GBS, further investigations are necessary. Full article

The use of 4-drug induction regimens for treatment naïve newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) is associated with improved depth of response and progression-free survival (PFS). However, head-to-head trials of 4-drug combinations are lacking, and instead, these regimens are typically compared to 3-drug backbones; limiting the ability to discern whether any additional benefit (or toxicity) is simply additive or represents a synergy (or interaction). We conducted a meta-analysis of phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trials that randomized treatment naïve NDMM patients to either a 4-drug or 3-drug induction regimen. We included 11 trials which represented 6509 unique patients. PFS for all trials in the meta-analysis was 54 months with a 4-drug induction and 8.9 months with a 3-drug induction (HR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.45; 0.54), but there was no benefit to using a 4-drug induction that did not include an anti-CD38 antibody (PFS 4-drug 8.1 months, PFS 3-drug 8.0 months; HR 0.95; 95% CI 0.86; 1.06). Adverse events were more frequent with the quadruplet regimens but were predominately mild. High-grade (≥3) adverse events (AEs) that were more common with 4-drug regimens were infections (RR: 1.34; 95% CI 1.17; 1.54) and thrombocytopenia (RR: 1.39; 95% CI 1.12; 1.74). This study suggests that 4-drug induction regimens which include an anti-CD38 antibody improve efficacy although with additional toxicity in NDMM patients. Full article

This systematic review examines the available clinical data on CD34+ cell mobilization, collection, and engraftment in multiple myeloma patients treated with the anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies daratumumab and isatuximab in clinical trials and in real life. Twenty-six clinical reports were published between 2019 and February 2024. Most studies documented lower circulating CD34+ cells after mobilization compared to controls, leading to higher plerixafor requirements. Although collection yields were significantly lower in approximately half of the studies, the collection target was achieved in similar proportions of daratumumab- and isatuximab-treated and nontreated patients, and access to autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) was comparable. This could be explained by the retained efficacy of plerixafor in anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody-treated patients, while no chemotherapy-based or sparing mobilization protocol proved superior. Half of the studies reported slower hematopoietic reconstitution after ASCT in daratumumab- and isatuximab-treated patients, without an excess of infectious complications. While no direct effect on stem cells was observed in vitro, emerging evidence suggests possible dysregulation of CD34+ cell adhesion after daratumumab treatment. Overall, anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies appear to interfere with CD34+ cell mobilization, without consistently leading to significant clinical consequences. Further research is needed to elucidate the underlying mechanisms and define optimal mobilization strategies in this patient population. Full article

Upfront high-dose therapy with melphalan (HDM) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has established itself as a core treatment for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients in the past 30 years. Induction therapy, HDM-ASCT, and subsequent consolidation and maintenance therapy comprise the current fundamental framework for MM treatment. The introduction of anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies such as daratumumab and isatuximab has changed the treatment paradigm for transplant-eligible NDMM patients in that quadruplets have become the new standard induction therapy. The treatment landscape of MM is undergoing a transformative shift with the introduction of potent new immunotherapies, such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells and bispecific antibodies (BsAbs), which are currently used in the relapsed/refractory setting (RRMM) and are already being tested in the NDMM. This review will focus on the incorporation of immunotherapy in the treatment scenario of NDMM patients eligible for ASCT. Full article

In multiple myeloma impressive outcomes have improved with the introduction of new therapeutic approaches, mainly those including naked monoclonal antibodies such as daratumumab and isatuximab. However, moving to earlier lines of therapy with effective anti-myeloma drugs led to an increase in the number of patients who developed multi-refractoriness to them early on. Currently, triple- or multi-refractory MM represents an unmet medical need, and their management remains a complicated challenge. The recent approval of new immunotherapeutic approaches such as conjugated monoclonal antibodies, bispecific antibodies, and CAR T cells could be a turning point for these heavily pretreated patients. Nevertheless, several issues regarding their use are unsolved, such as how to select patients for each strategy or how to sequence these therapies within the MM therapeutic landscape. Here we provide an overview of the most recent data about approved conjugated monoclonal antibody belantamab, mafodotin, bispecific antibody teclistamab, and other promising compounds under development, mainly focusing on the ongoing clinical trials with monoclonal antibody combination approaches in advanced and earlier phases of MM treatment. Full article

Multiple myeloma is a malignancy of immunoglobulin-secreting plasma cells that is now often treated in the newly diagnosed and relapsed and/or refractory settings with monoclonal antibodies targeting lineage-specific markers used either alone or in rationally designed combination regimens. Among these are the anti-CD38 antibodies daratumumab and isatuximab, and the anti-Signaling lymphocytic activation molecule family member 7 antibody elotuzumab, all of which are used in their unconjugated formats. Single-chain variable fragments from antibodies also form a key element of the chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) in the B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-targeted CAR T-cell products idecabtagene vicleucel and ciltacabtagene autoleucel, which are approved in the advanced setting. Most recently, the bispecific anti-BCMA and T-cell-engaging antibody teclistamab has become available, again for patients with relapsed/refractory disease. Another format into which antibodies can be converted to exert anti-tumor efficacy is as antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs), and belantamab mafodotin, which also targets BCMA, represented the first such agent that gained a foothold in myeloma. Negative results from a recent Phase III study have prompted the initiation of a process for withdrawal of its marketing authorization. However, belantamab remains a drug with some promise, and many other ADCs targeting either BCMA or other plasma cell surface markers are in development and showing potential. This contribution will provide an overview of some of the current data supporting the possibility that ADCs will remain a part of our chemotherapeutic armamentarium against myeloma moving forward, and also highlight areas for future development. Full article