Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (7)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = immunobridging

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
11 pages, 1286 KiB  
Article
Safety and Immunogenicity of the Tetravalent Recombinant COVID-19 Protein Vaccine SCTV01E in Children and Adolescents Aged 3 to 17 Years: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase 2 Clinical Trial
by Fengcai Zhu, Ting Huang, Pengfei Jin, Linglin Zhang, Zhongqiang Jin, Wenli Zhang, Dongya Yuan, Zhong Wang, Yusong Deng, Jiaxin Li, Xiao Shen, Yongpan Fu, Jian Li, Xinjie Yang, Jing Li and Liangzhi Xie
Vaccines 2025, 13(1), 43; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13010043 - 7 Jan 2025
Viewed by 1030
Abstract
Background: SCTV01E is a tetravalent recombinant COVID-19 vaccine authorized for emergency use in China for adults 18 years and older but not for those under 18. Objective: This Phase 2 trial assessed the safety and immunogenicity of SCTV01E in healthy children [...] Read more.
Background: SCTV01E is a tetravalent recombinant COVID-19 vaccine authorized for emergency use in China for adults 18 years and older but not for those under 18. Objective: This Phase 2 trial assessed the safety and immunogenicity of SCTV01E in healthy children and adolescents aged 3 to 17 years, to establish immunobridging with that observed in adults from the efficacy pivotal trial (NCT05308576). Methods: Participants were randomly assigned to receive either 30 µg of SCTV01E or a placebo. Primary endpoints were safety and immunogenicity focused on the geometric mean titer (GMT) and seroresponse rate (SRR) of neutralizing antibodies (nAb) against Omicron BA.5. Results: In total, 268 participants (214 SCTV01E vs. 54 placebo) were included in the safety analysis, with 241 participants (191 vs. 50) in the immunogenicity analysis. Overall, 127 (59.3%) participants receiving SCTV01E and 9 (16.7%) receiving a placebo reported adverse events (AEs), most of which were Grade 1 or 2. No serious adverse events (SAEs) or adverse events of special interest (AESIs) were reported. In the immunogenicity bridging analysis, data from 95 youths were compared with data from 188 adults; the geometric mean ratio (GMR) of the titers was 8.78 (95% CI: 6.05–12.74, p < 0.001), with the lower bound of the 95% CI exceeding 0.67. The difference in the SRR was 6.34% (95% CI: 0.93–11.22%) (p = 0.029), and the lower bound of the 95%CI was >−5%, indicating superiority. Conclusions: SCTV01E was found to be safe and well tolerated in children and adolescents, generating a robust immune response against Omicron BA.5. This supports its potential use in younger populations. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 578 KiB  
Opinion
Immunobridging Trials: An Important Tool to Protect Vulnerable and Immunocompromised Patients Against Evolving Pathogens
by Pedro Cruz, Jie Min Lam, Jehad Abdalla, Samira Bell, Jola Bytyci, Tal Brosh-Nissimov, John Gill, Ghady Haidar, Michael Hoerger, Yasmin Maor, Antonio Pagliuca, Francois Raffi, Ffion Samuels, Dorry Segev, Yuxin Ying and Lennard Y. W. Lee
Vaccines 2025, 13(1), 19; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13010019 - 29 Dec 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1965
Abstract
Safeguarding patients from emerging infectious diseases demands strategies that prioritise patient well-being and protection. Immunobridging is an established trial methodology which has been increasingly employed to ensure patient protection and provide clinicians with swift access to vaccines. It uses immunological markers to infer [...] Read more.
Safeguarding patients from emerging infectious diseases demands strategies that prioritise patient well-being and protection. Immunobridging is an established trial methodology which has been increasingly employed to ensure patient protection and provide clinicians with swift access to vaccines. It uses immunological markers to infer the effectiveness of a new drug through a surrogate measure of efficacy. Recently, this method has also been employed to authorise novel drugs, such as COVID-19 vaccines, and this article explores the concepts behind immunobridging trials, their advantages, issues, and significance in the context of COVID-19 and other infectious diseases. Our goal is to improve awareness among clinicians, patient groups, regulators, and health leaders of the opportunities and issues of immunobridging, so that fewer patients are left without protection from infectious diseases, particularly from major pathogens that may emerge. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Vaccines, Clinical Advancement, and Associated Immunology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 2792 KiB  
Article
Immunogenicity, Safety, and Immune Persistence of One Dose of SARS-CoV-2 Recombinant Adenovirus Type-5 Vectored Vaccine in Children and Adolescents Aged 6–17 Years: An Immunobridging Trial
by Xu Han, Mingwei Wei, Xiuyu Zheng, Peng Wan, Jie Tang, Lu Zhang, Shupeng Zhang, Hanchi Zhou, Jiayu Lu, Li Zhou, Yawen Zhu, Jingxin Li and Fengcai Zhu
Vaccines 2024, 12(6), 683; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines12060683 - 19 Jun 2024
Viewed by 1406
Abstract
Background: Though children infected by SARS-CoV-2 generally experience milder symptoms compared to adults, severe cases can occur. Additionally, children can transmit the virus to others. Therefore, the availability of safe and effective COVID-19 vaccines for children and adolescents is crucial. Method: A single-center, [...] Read more.
Background: Though children infected by SARS-CoV-2 generally experience milder symptoms compared to adults, severe cases can occur. Additionally, children can transmit the virus to others. Therefore, the availability of safe and effective COVID-19 vaccines for children and adolescents is crucial. Method: A single-center, randomized, double-blind clinical trial was conducted in Funing County, Yancheng City, Jiangsu Province, China. Healthy children and adolescents were divided into two subgroups (6–12 years old or 13–17 years old) and randomly assigned to one of three groups to receive one dose of Ad5-nCoV (3 × 1010 vp/dose). Another group, aged 18–59, received one dose of Ad5-nCoV (5 × 1010 vp/dose) as the control group. At 28, 90, 180, and 360 days post-vaccination, we measured the geometric mean titer (GMT)/concentration (GMC) of neutralizing and binding antibodies against the prototype SARS-CoV-2 strain, as well as serum antibody levels against the BA.4/5 variant. We also evaluated the incidence of adverse events within 28 days post-vaccination. Results: A total of 2413 individuals were screened from 3 June 2021 to 25 July 2021, of whom 2021 eligible participants were enrolled, including 1009 aged 6~17 years in the children and adolescent group and 1012 aged 18–59 years in the adults group. The GMT of anti-wild SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies was 18.6 (95% CI, 16.6–20.9) in children and adolescents and 13.2 (95% CI, 11.6–15.0) in adults on day 28. The incidence of solicited adverse reactions between the adult group (49.4% [124/251]) and the children and adolescent group (46.3% [156/337]) was not statistically significant. The neutralizing antibody levels decreased by a factor of 3.29 from day 28 to day 360 post-vaccination. Conclusions: A single dose of Ad5-nCoV at 3 × 1010 virus particles/dose is safe in children and adolescents, and it elicited significant immune response, which was not only non-inferior but also superior to that in adults aged 18–59 years. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 4070 KiB  
Article
Effector-Memory B-Lymphocytes and Follicular Helper T-Lymphocytes as Central Players in the Immune Response in Vaccinated and Nonvaccinated Populations against SARS-CoV-2
by Lorenzo Islas-Vazquez, Marisa Cruz-Aguilar, Henry Velazquez-Soto, Aida Jiménez-Corona, Sonia Mayra Pérez-Tapia and Maria C. Jimenez-Martinez
Vaccines 2022, 10(10), 1761; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10101761 - 20 Oct 2022
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 3626
Abstract
Vaccines have been recognized as having a central role in controlling the COVID-19 pandemic; however, most vaccine development research is focused on IgG-induced antibodies. Here, we analyzed the generation of IgGs related to SARS-CoV-2 and the changes in B- and T-lymphocyte proportions following [...] Read more.
Vaccines have been recognized as having a central role in controlling the COVID-19 pandemic; however, most vaccine development research is focused on IgG-induced antibodies. Here, we analyzed the generation of IgGs related to SARS-CoV-2 and the changes in B- and T-lymphocyte proportions following vaccination against COVID-19. We included samples from 69 volunteers inoculated with the Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2), Astra Zeneca (AZD1222 Covishield), or Sputnik V (Gam-COVID-Vac) vaccines. IgGs related to SARS-CoV-2 increased after the first vaccine dose compared with the nonvaccinated group (Pfizer, p = 0.0001; Astra Zeneca, p < 0.0001; Sputnik V, p = 0.0089). The results of the flow cytometry analysis of B- and T-lymphocytes showed a higher proportion of effector-memory B-lymphocytes in both first and second doses when compared with the nonvaccinated subjects. FcRL4+ cells were increased in second-dose-vaccinated COVID-19(−) and recovered COVID-19(+) participants when compared with the nonvaccinated participants. COVID-19(−) participants showed a lower proportion of follicular helper T-lymphocytes (TFH) in the second dose when compared with the first-vaccine-dose and nonvaccinated subjects. In conclusion, after the first vaccine dose, immunization against SARS-CoV-2 induces IgG production, and this could be mediated by TFH and effector-memory B-lymphocytes. Our data can be used in the design of vaccine schedules to evaluate immuno-bridging from a cellular point of view. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Humoral and Cellular Response after COVID-19 Vaccination)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 479 KiB  
Review
Bridging Animal and Human Data in Pursuit of Vaccine Licensure
by Courtney L. Finch, William E. Dowling, Thomas H. King, Christian Martinez, Bai V. Nguyen, Ramon Roozendaal, Roxana Rustomjee, Mario H. Skiadopoulos, Ekaterina Vert-Wong, Ann Yellowlees and Nancy J. Sullivan
Vaccines 2022, 10(9), 1384; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10091384 - 25 Aug 2022
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 2455
Abstract
The FDA Animal Rule was devised to facilitate approval of candidate vaccines and therapeutics using animal survival data when human efficacy studies are not practical or ethical. This regulatory pathway is critical for candidates against pathogens with high case fatality rates that prohibit [...] Read more.
The FDA Animal Rule was devised to facilitate approval of candidate vaccines and therapeutics using animal survival data when human efficacy studies are not practical or ethical. This regulatory pathway is critical for candidates against pathogens with high case fatality rates that prohibit human challenge trials, as well as candidates with low and sporadic incidences of outbreaks that make human field trials difficult. Important components of a vaccine development plan for Animal Rule licensure are the identification of an immune correlate of protection and immunobridging to humans. The relationship of vaccine-induced immune responses to survival after vaccination and challenge must be established in validated animal models and then used to infer predictive vaccine efficacy in humans via immunobridging. The Sabin Vaccine Institute is pursuing licensure for candidate filovirus vaccines via the Animal Rule and has convened meetings of key opinion leaders and subject matter experts to define fundamental components for vaccine licensure in the absence of human efficacy data. Here, filoviruses are used as examples to review immune correlates of protection and immunobridging. The points presented herein reflect the presentations and discussions during the second meeting held in October 2021 and are intended to address important considerations for developing immunobridging strategies. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1489 KiB  
Article
Safety and Immunogenicity of the BBIBP-CorV Vaccine in Adolescents Aged 12 to 17 Years in the Thai Population: An Immunobridging Study
by Kriangkrai Tawinprai, Taweegrit Siripongboonsitti, Thachanun Porntharukchareon, Preeda Vanichsetakul, Saraiorn Thonginnetra, Krongkwan Niemsorn, Pathariya Promsena, Manunya Tandhansakul, Naruporn Kasemlawan, Natthanan Ruangkijpaisal, Narin Banomyong, Nanthida Phattraprayoon, Teerapat Ungtrakul, Kasiruck Wittayasak, Nawarat Thonwirak, Kamonwan Soonklang, Gaidganok Sornsamdang and Nithi Mahanonda
Vaccines 2022, 10(5), 807; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10050807 - 19 May 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2774
Abstract
Adolescents can develop a severe form of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), especially with underlying comorbidities. No study has examined the efficacy or effectiveness of inactivated COVID-19 vaccines in adolescents. This single-center, prospective cohort study was performed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of [...] Read more.
Adolescents can develop a severe form of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), especially with underlying comorbidities. No study has examined the efficacy or effectiveness of inactivated COVID-19 vaccines in adolescents. This single-center, prospective cohort study was performed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of an inactivated COVID-19 vaccine in adolescents using the immunobridging approach at Chulabhorn Hospital. The key eligibility criterion was a healthy clinical condition or stable pre-existing comorbidity. The anti-receptor-binding domain (anti-RBD) antibody concentration at 4 weeks after dose 2 of the vaccine was compared between participants aged 12 to 17 years and those aged 18 to 30 years. Safety profiles included adverse events within 7 days after each dose of the vaccine and any adverse events through 1 month after dose 2 of the vaccine. In the adolescent and adult cohorts, the geometric mean concentration of anti-RBD antibody was 102.9 binding antibody unit (BAU)/mL (95% CI, 91.0–116.4) and 36.9 BAU/mL (95% CI, 30.9–44.0), respectively. The geometric mean ratio of the adolescent cohort was 2.79 (95% CI, 2.25–3.46, p < 0.0001) compared with the adult cohort, meeting the non-inferiority criterion. The reactogenicity was slightly lower in the adolescent than in the adult cohort. No serious adverse events occurred. The inactivated COVID-19 vaccine appears safe and effective in adolescents. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue COVID-19 Vaccination and Globe Public Health)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 743 KiB  
Article
An Immunobridging Study to Evaluate the Neutralizing Antibody Titer in Adults Immunized with Two Doses of Either ChAdOx1-nCov-19 (AstraZeneca) or MVC-COV1901
by Josue Antonio Estrada, Chien-Yu Cheng, Shin-Yen Ku, Hui-Chun Hu, Hsiu-Wen Yeh, Yi-Chun Lin, Cheng-Pin Chen, Shu-Hsing Cheng, Robert Janssen and I-Feng Lin
Vaccines 2022, 10(5), 655; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10050655 - 21 Apr 2022
Cited by 20 | Viewed by 11671
Abstract
Rapid development and deployment of vaccines is crucial to control the continuously evolving COVID-19 pandemic. The placebo-controlled phase 3 efficacy trial is still the standard for authorizing vaccines in the majority of the world. However, due to a lack of eligible participants in [...] Read more.
Rapid development and deployment of vaccines is crucial to control the continuously evolving COVID-19 pandemic. The placebo-controlled phase 3 efficacy trial is still the standard for authorizing vaccines in the majority of the world. However, due to a lack of eligible participants in parts of the world, this has not always been feasible. Recently, the Taiwan Food and Drug Administration, following the consensus of the International Coalition of Medicines Regulatory Authorities (ICMRA), adopted the use of immunobridging studies as acceptable for authorizing COVID-19 vaccines in lieu of efficacy data. Here, we describe a study in which our candidate vaccine, MVC-COV1901, an adjuvanted protein subunit vaccine, has been granted emergency use authorization (EUA) in Taiwan based on a noninferiority immunobridging study. Immunogenicity results from the per protocol immunogenicity (PPI) subset (n = 903) from the MVC-COV1901 phase 2 trial were compared with results from 200 subjects who had received an adenovirus vector vaccine, AstraZeneca ChAdOx nCOV-19 (AZD1222), in a separate study. The lower bound of the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the geometric mean titer (GMT) ratio comparing MVC-COV1901 to AZD1222 was 3.4. The lower bound of the 95% CI of the sero-response rate was 95.5%. Both the GMT ratio and sero-response rate exceeded the criteria established by the Taiwan regulatory authority, leading to EUA approval of MVC-COV1901 in Taiwan. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section COVID-19 Vaccines and Vaccination)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop