Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (14)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = graft-versus-myeloma effect

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
19 pages, 2850 KiB  
Article
The Impact of Cell-Intrinsic STAT6 Protein on Donor T Cell-Mediated Graft-Versus-Tumor Effect
by Xiaoqun Guan, Hope Fury, Priya D. Issuree, Tyler Atagozli, Emory E. McManimon, Peng Shao, Yue Li, Michael Chimenti, Noah S. Butler, Mark H. Kaplan, David E. Elliott, Bruce R. Blazar and M. Nedim Ince
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(1), 280; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26010280 - 31 Dec 2024
Viewed by 1481
Abstract
Bone marrow transplantation (BMT) is mainly performed to restore an anti-tumor immune response, called the graft-versus-tumor (GVT) effect, against leukemia, myeloma and lymphoma. This GVT reactivity is driven by donor T cells, and it can also cause lethal graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). We previously [...] Read more.
Bone marrow transplantation (BMT) is mainly performed to restore an anti-tumor immune response, called the graft-versus-tumor (GVT) effect, against leukemia, myeloma and lymphoma. This GVT reactivity is driven by donor T cells, and it can also cause lethal graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). We previously demonstrated that the colonization of mice with helminths preserves the GVT response while suppressing GVHD. As the T helper-2 (Th2) pathway is critical to helminthic immune regulation, we asked whether the genetic induction of Th2 signaling in donor T cells can restore helminthic immune regulation after BMT. Our studies utilized transgenic donor T lymphocytes that overexpress a constitutively active form of the Th2-associated transcription factor STAT6. Constitutively active STAT6 sustained the GVT response without causing severe acute GVHD, where transgenic T cells generated robust quantities of cytotoxic proteins important in GVT response, such as granzymes A and B, interferon-γ and Fas ligand, in addition to generating high quantities of Th2/regulatory cytokines. Bioinformatic analysis based on chromosome immune precipitation experiments indicated that STAT6 stimulates the expression of granzymes directly. Thus, in preserving the GVT response without causing GVHD mortality, our results indicate the therapeutic potential of restoring helminthic immune modulation by targeting STAT6 and STAT6-dependent T cell maturation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Research on Host-Parasite Interactions)
Show Figures

Figure 1

8 pages, 191 KiB  
Article
Impact of Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant on Safety and Outcomes of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell (CAR-T) Therapy in Patients with Multiple Myeloma (MM)
by Ayrton Bangolo, Behzad Amoozgar, Lili Zhang, Vignesh K. Nagesh, Imranjot Sekhon, Simcha Weissman, David Vesole, Pooja Phull, Michele Donato, Noa Biran, David Siegel and Harsh Parmar
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(20), 6207; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13206207 - 18 Oct 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2166
Abstract
Background: Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) has seen limited use in treating multiple myeloma (MM), despite its potential to offer long-term survival or even cure through the graft-versus-myeloma effect. Its limited application is largely due to concerns over serious complications like infections and [...] Read more.
Background: Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) has seen limited use in treating multiple myeloma (MM), despite its potential to offer long-term survival or even cure through the graft-versus-myeloma effect. Its limited application is largely due to concerns over serious complications like infections and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). The possibility of GVHD exacerbation when CAR-T cells are administered to patients previously treated with allo-SCT remains a topic of concern. Ciltacabtagene autoleucel (Cilta-cel) and idecabtagene vicleucel (Ide-cel) are CAR-T therapies that have been FDA-approved for relapsed/refractory (R/R) MM. A recent study using data from the CARTITUDE-1 trial has shown promising safety and efficacy of Cilta-Cel in patients with a prior history of allo-SCT. This report outlines our real-world experience with CAR-T treatment in such patients. The objective of this study is to assess the safety and effectiveness of CAR-T therapy in R/R MM patients who have previously undergone allo-SCT. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of adult patients (18–70 years old) with R/R MM treated with CAR-T therapy as part of an institutional IRB-approved protocol. Data were collected on safety and efficacy outcomes from the institution’s records. Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) version 5.0. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) were graded based on American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT) criteria. Efficacy metrics included overall response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS), analyzed through the Kaplan–Meier method, with PFS defined as the time from CAR-T initiation to disease progression or death. Results: Of the 56 patients treated with CAR-T therapy, 8 (14.3%) had previously undergone allo-SCT. These patients had a median of seven prior therapy lines (LOTs), compared to five LOTs in the non-allo-SCT group (p = 0.04). CAR-T infusion occurred a median of 98.8 months after allo-SCT, with a range from 57.9 months to 178.5 months. CRS occurred in 87.5% of the allo-SCT group versus 77.1% in the non-allo-SCT group (p = 0.48). One patient in the allo-SCT group developed hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH), requiring anakinra. At a median follow-up of 4.8 months, the ORR was 87.5% in the allo-SCT group versus 75% in the non-allo-SCT group (p = 0.4). Median PFS had not been reached for the allo-SCT group at the time of analysis compared to 11.9 months in the non-allo-SCT group (p = 0.5). No treatment-related mortality or acute GVHD was noted in the allo-SCT cohort. Conclusions: The study suggests that prior allo-SCT does not adversely affect the safety or efficacy of CAR-T therapy in patients with R/R MM. These findings highlight the need for further investigations with larger patient samples and longer follow-up to better understand the interaction between allo-SCT and CAR-T therapy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Applications of Tumor Immunotherapy)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

23 pages, 2364 KiB  
Review
Advancements in Personalized CAR-T Therapy: Comprehensive Overview of Biomarkers and Therapeutic Targets in Hematological Malignancies
by Wioletta Olejarz, Karol Sadowski, Daniel Szulczyk and Grzegorz Basak
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(14), 7743; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25147743 - 15 Jul 2024
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 4823
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy is a novel anticancer therapy using autologous or allogeneic T-cells. To date, six CAR-T therapies for specific B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL), and multiple myeloma (MM) have been approved by the Food and Drug [...] Read more.
Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy is a novel anticancer therapy using autologous or allogeneic T-cells. To date, six CAR-T therapies for specific B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL), and multiple myeloma (MM) have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Significant barriers to the effectiveness of CAR-T therapy include cytokine release syndrome (CRS), neurotoxicity in the case of Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation (Allo-SCT) graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD), antigen escape, modest antitumor activity, restricted trafficking, limited persistence, the immunosuppressive microenvironment, and senescence and exhaustion of CAR-Ts. Furthermore, cancer drug resistance remains a major problem in clinical practice. CAR-T therapy, in combination with checkpoint blockades and bispecific T-cell engagers (BiTEs) or other drugs, appears to be an appealing anticancer strategy. Many of these agents have shown impressive results, combining efficacy with tolerability. Biomarkers like extracellular vesicles (EVs), cell-free DNA (cfDNA), circulating tumor (ctDNA) and miRNAs may play an important role in toxicity, relapse assessment, and efficacy prediction, and can be implicated in clinical applications of CAR-T therapy and in establishing safe and efficacious personalized medicine. However, further research is required to fully comprehend the particular side effects of immunomodulation, to ascertain the best order and combination of this medication with conventional chemotherapy and targeted therapies, and to find reliable predictive biomarkers. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomarkers in Cancer Immunology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 2684 KiB  
Article
Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma: Risk Factors and Outcomes in the Era of New Therapeutic Options—A Single-Center Experience
by Irene Strassl, Alexander Nikoloudis, Sigrid Machherndl-Spandl, Veronika Buxhofer-Ausch, Michaela Binder, Dagmar Wipplinger, Olga Stiefel, Emine Kaynak, Robert Milanov, Christoph Aichinger, Stefanie Nocker, Thomas Bauer, Stefanie Kreissl, Michael Girschikofsky, Andreas Petzer, Ansgar Weltermann and Johannes Clausen
Cancers 2023, 15(24), 5738; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15245738 - 7 Dec 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2438
Abstract
Background: Despite major treatment advances, multiple myeloma remains incurable. The outcome of patients who are refractory to immunomodulatory agents, proteasome inhibitors, and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies is poor, and improved treatment strategies for this difficult-to-treat patient population are an unmet medical need. Methods: This [...] Read more.
Background: Despite major treatment advances, multiple myeloma remains incurable. The outcome of patients who are refractory to immunomodulatory agents, proteasome inhibitors, and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies is poor, and improved treatment strategies for this difficult-to-treat patient population are an unmet medical need. Methods: This retrospective, unicentric analysis included 38 patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma or plasma cell leukemia who underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) between 2013 and 2022. Survival outcomes, relapse incidence, and non-relapse mortality were calculated according to remission status, date of allo-HSCT, cytogenetic risk status, timing, and number of previous autologous HSCTs. Results: The median PFS was 13.6 months (95% CI, 7.7–30.4) and the median OS was 51.4 months (95% CI, 23.5–NA) in the overall cohort. The cumulative incidence of relapse at 3 years was 57%, and non-relapse mortality was 16%. The median PFS and OS were significantly longer in patients with very good partial remission (VGPR) or better compared to patients with less than VGPR at the time of allo-HSCT (mPFS 29.7 months (95% CI, 13.7–NA) vs. 6.5 months (95% CI, 2.6–17.0); p = 0.009 and mOS not reached vs. 18.6 months (95% CI, 7.0–NA); p = 0.006). Conclusion: For selected patients, allo-HSCT may result in favorable overall survival, in part by providing an appropriate hemato-immunological basis for subsequent therapies. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

31 pages, 2537 KiB  
Review
Harnessing Unconventional T Cells and Innate Lymphoid Cells to Prevent and Treat Hematological Malignancies: Prospects for New Immunotherapy
by Alessandro Allegra, Marco Casciaro, Elena Lo Presti, Caterina Musolino and Sebastiano Gangemi
Biomolecules 2022, 12(6), 754; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom12060754 - 27 May 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 4298
Abstract
Unconventional T cells and innate lymphoid cells (ILCs) make up a heterogeneous set of cells that characteristically show prompt responses toward specific antigens. Unconventional T cells recognize non-peptide antigens, which are bound and presented by diverse non-polymorphic antigen-presenting molecules and comprise γδ T [...] Read more.
Unconventional T cells and innate lymphoid cells (ILCs) make up a heterogeneous set of cells that characteristically show prompt responses toward specific antigens. Unconventional T cells recognize non-peptide antigens, which are bound and presented by diverse non-polymorphic antigen-presenting molecules and comprise γδ T cells, MR1-restricted mucosal-associated invariant T cells (MAITs), and natural killer T cells (NKTs). On the other hand, ILCs lack antigen-specific receptors and act as the innate counterpart to the T lymphocytes found in the adaptive immune response. The alteration of unconventional T cells and ILCs in frequency and functionality is correlated with the onset of several autoimmune diseases, allergy, inflammation, and tumor. However, depending on the physio-pathological framework, unconventional T cells may exhibit either protective or pathogenic activity in a range of neoplastic diseases. Nonetheless, experimental models and clinical studies have displayed that some unconventional T cells are potential therapeutic targets, as well as prognostic and diagnostic markers. In fact, cell-mediated immune response in tumors has become the focus in immunotherapy against neoplastic disease. This review concentrates on the present knowledge concerning the function of unconventional T cell sets in the antitumor immune response in hematological malignancies, such as acute and chronic leukemia, multiple myeloma, and lymphoproliferative disorders. Moreover, we discuss the possibility that modulating the activity of unconventional T cells could be useful in the treatment of hematological neoplasms, in the prevention of specific conditions (such as graft versus host disease), and in the formulation of an effective anticancer vaccine therapy. The exact knowledge of the role of these cells could represent the prerequisite for the creation of a new form of immunotherapy for hematological neoplasms. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Perspectives on Immune Cells in Allergy and Inflammation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 718 KiB  
Review
Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma
by Christine Greil, Monika Engelhardt, Jürgen Finke and Ralph Wäsch
Cancers 2022, 14(1), 55; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14010055 - 23 Dec 2021
Cited by 22 | Viewed by 4963
Abstract
The development of new inhibitory and immunological agents and combination therapies significantly improved response rates and survival of patients diagnosed with multiple myeloma (MM) in the last decade, but the disease is still considered to be incurable by current standards and the prognosis [...] Read more.
The development of new inhibitory and immunological agents and combination therapies significantly improved response rates and survival of patients diagnosed with multiple myeloma (MM) in the last decade, but the disease is still considered to be incurable by current standards and the prognosis is dismal especially in high-risk groups and in relapsed and/or refractory patients. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) may enable long-term survival and even cure for individual patients via an immune-mediated graft-versus-myeloma (GvM) effect, but remains controversial due to relevant transplant-related risks, particularly immunosuppression and graft-versus-host disease, and a substantial non-relapse mortality. The decreased risk of disease progression may outweigh this treatment-related toxicity for young, fit patients in high-risk constellations with otherwise often poor long-term prognosis. Here, allo-SCT should be considered within clinical trials in first-line as part of a tandem approach to separate myeloablation achieved by high-dose chemotherapy with autologous SCT, and following allo-SCT with a reduced-intensity conditioning to minimize treatment-related organ toxicities but allow GvM effect. Our review aims to better define the role of allo-SCT in myeloma treatment particularly in the context of new immunomodulatory approaches. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Autologous and Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant in Cancer Therapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 2179 KiB  
Review
Harnessing the Immune System to Fight Multiple Myeloma
by Jakub Krejcik, Mike Bogetofte Barnkob, Charlotte Guldborg Nyvold, Thomas Stauffer Larsen, Torben Barington and Niels Abildgaard
Cancers 2021, 13(18), 4546; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13184546 - 10 Sep 2021
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 4552
Abstract
Multiple myeloma (MM) is a heterogeneous plasma cell malignancy differing substantially in clinical behavior, prognosis, and response to treatment. With the advent of novel therapies, many patients achieve long-lasting remissions, but some experience aggressive and treatment refractory relapses. So far, MM is considered [...] Read more.
Multiple myeloma (MM) is a heterogeneous plasma cell malignancy differing substantially in clinical behavior, prognosis, and response to treatment. With the advent of novel therapies, many patients achieve long-lasting remissions, but some experience aggressive and treatment refractory relapses. So far, MM is considered incurable. Myeloma pathogenesis can broadly be explained by two interacting mechanisms, intraclonal evolution of cancer cells and development of an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Failures in isotype class switching and somatic hypermutations result in the neoplastic transformation typical of MM and other B cell malignancies. Interestingly, although genetic alterations occur and evolve over time, they are also present in premalignant stages, which never progress to MM, suggesting that genetic mutations are necessary but not sufficient for myeloma transformation. Changes in composition and function of the immune cells are associated with loss of effective immune surveillance, which might represent another mechanism driving malignant transformation. During the last decade, the traditional view on myeloma treatment has changed dramatically. It is increasingly evident that treatment strategies solely based on targeting intrinsic properties of myeloma cells are insufficient. Lately, approaches that redirect the cells of the otherwise suppressed immune system to take control over myeloma have emerged. Evidence of utility of this principle was initially established by the observation of the graft-versus-myeloma effect in allogeneic stem cell-transplanted patients. A variety of new strategies to harness both innate and antigen-specific immunity against MM have recently been developed and intensively tested in clinical trials. This review aims to give readers a basic understanding of how the immune system can be engaged to treat MM, to summarize the main immunotherapeutic modalities, their current role in clinical care, and future prospects. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Multiple Myeloma: Targeted Therapy and Immunotherapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 260 KiB  
Review
Donor Lymphocyte Infusion to Enhance the Graft-versus-Myeloma Effect
by Nico Gagelmann and Nicolaus Kröger
Hemato 2021, 2(2), 207-216; https://doi.org/10.3390/hemato2020012 - 14 Apr 2021
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 3021
Abstract
Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) has the potential to significantly deepen the response after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in multiple myeloma (MM). Subsequently, DLI offers the opportunity for long-term progression-free and, most importantly, overall survival for patients with MM. DLI application is a [...] Read more.
Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) has the potential to significantly deepen the response after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in multiple myeloma (MM). Subsequently, DLI offers the opportunity for long-term progression-free and, most importantly, overall survival for patients with MM. DLI application is a complex procedure, whereby many factors need to be considered (e.g., patient-oriented factors prior to application, disease-specific factors, as well as possible combinations with further therapies during and after DLI). There are two settings in which DLI can be given, they are as follows: as a salvage option in progressive disease or in the prophylactic setting for MM patients with resolved disease to further deepen the response. While the first studies used DLI in the salvage setting, results for prophylactic DLI appear to be associated with better and prolonged outcomes. Furthermore, DLI (both prophylactic and salvage) given earlier after ASCT (3–6 months) appear to be associated with better outcomes. The incorporation of novel agents showed similar responses and survival after DLI. However, updated and larger evaluations are urgently needed to determine the specific role of multiple variables in such a complex treatment environment of ASCT in an ever-evolving field of MM. This review underlines the rationale for DLI after ASCT, results in the salvage and prophylactic settings, patterns of disease progression after DLI, as well as avenues to further enhance the graft-versus-myeloma effect exerted by DLI. Full article
19 pages, 345 KiB  
Review
Role of Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma
by Srinivas Devarakonda, Yvonne Efebera and Nidhi Sharma
Cancers 2021, 13(4), 863; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13040863 - 18 Feb 2021
Cited by 28 | Viewed by 6269
Abstract
Autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT) has been the standard of care in eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) patients. Outcomes of patients with MM have improved significantly due to the advent of several novel drugs. Upfront use of these drugs in induction therapy [...] Read more.
Autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT) has been the standard of care in eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) patients. Outcomes of patients with MM have improved significantly due to the advent of several novel drugs. Upfront use of these drugs in induction therapy has significantly increased the rate and depth of responses that have translated into longer remission and survival. This has now raised a debate regarding the role and relevance of auto-SCT in the management of myeloma. However, clinical trials have confirmed the utility of auto-SCT even in the era of novel drugs. Tandem auto-SCT followed by maintenance has shown a progression-free survival (PFS) benefit in high-risk MM, and hence can be considered in young and fit patients with high-risk disease. Auto-SCT has the advantages of resetting the bone marrow microenvironment, short-lived toxicity compared to the long-term physical and financial toxicities of continued chemotherapy in the absence of SCT, very low transplant-related mortality (TRM) in high volume centers, and providing longer disease-free survival when followed by maintenance therapy. Allogeneic SCT is one potentially curative option for MM, albeit with an increased risk of death due to high TRM. Strategies to modulate the graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) while maintaining or improving the graft-versus-myeloma (GVM) effect could place allogeneic SCT back in the treatment armamentarium of MM. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Stem Cell Transplantation in Cancer Treatment)
15 pages, 3753 KiB  
Article
Preclinical Evaluation of Invariant Natural Killer T Cells Modified with CD38 or BCMA Chimeric Antigen Receptors for Multiple Myeloma
by Renée Poels, Esther Drent, Roeland Lameris, Afroditi Katsarou, Maria Themeli, Hans J. van der Vliet, Tanja D. de Gruijl, Niels W. C. J. van de Donk and Tuna Mutis
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(3), 1096; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22031096 - 22 Jan 2021
Cited by 41 | Viewed by 5520
Abstract
Due to the CD1d restricted recognition of altered glycolipids, Vα24-invariant natural killer T (iNKT) cells are excellent tools for cancer immunotherapy with a significantly reduced risk for graft-versus-host disease when applied as off-the shelf-therapeutics across Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) barriers. To maximally harness [...] Read more.
Due to the CD1d restricted recognition of altered glycolipids, Vα24-invariant natural killer T (iNKT) cells are excellent tools for cancer immunotherapy with a significantly reduced risk for graft-versus-host disease when applied as off-the shelf-therapeutics across Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) barriers. To maximally harness their therapeutic potential for multiple myeloma (MM) treatment, we here armed iNKT cells with chimeric antigen receptors (CAR) directed against the MM-associated antigen CD38 and the plasma cell specific B cell maturation antigen (BCMA). We demonstrate that both CD38- and BCMA-CAR iNKT cells effectively eliminated MM cells in a CAR-dependent manner, without losing their T cell receptor (TCR)-mediated cytotoxic activity. Importantly, iNKT cells expressing either BCMA-CARs or affinity-optimized CD38-CARs spared normal hematopoietic cells and displayed a Th1-like cytokine profile, indicating their therapeutic utility. While the costimulatory domain of CD38-CARs had no influence on the cytotoxic functions of iNKT cells, CARs containing the 4-1BB domain showed a better expansion capacity. Interestingly, when stimulated only via CD1d+ dendritic cells (DCs) loaded with α-galactosylceramide (α-GalCer), both CD38- and BCMA-CAR iNKT cells expanded well, without losing their CAR- or TCR-dependent cytotoxic activities. This suggests the possibility of developing an off-the-shelf therapy with CAR iNKT cells, which might even be boostable in vivo by administration α-GalCer pulsed DCs. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 257 KiB  
Review
Allogeneic Hematopoietic Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma in the New Drugs Era: A Platform to Cure
by Alberto Mussetti, Maria Queralt Salas and Vittorio Montefusco
J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9(11), 3437; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9113437 - 26 Oct 2020
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3070
Abstract
Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) represents a treatment option for multiple myeloma (MM) patients. As shown in several studies, alloHCT is highly effective, but it is hampered by a high toxicity, mainly related to the graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), a complex immunological reaction ascribable [...] Read more.
Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) represents a treatment option for multiple myeloma (MM) patients. As shown in several studies, alloHCT is highly effective, but it is hampered by a high toxicity, mainly related to the graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), a complex immunological reaction ascribable to the donor’s immune system. The morbidity and mortality associated with GVHD can weaken the benefits of this procedure. On the other side, the high therapeutic potential of alloHCT is also related to the donor’s immune system, through immunological activity known as the graft-versus-myeloma effect. Clinical research over the past two decades has sought to enhance the favorable part of this balance, along with the reduction in treatment-related toxicity. Frontline alloHCT showed promising results and a potential for a cure in the past. Currently, thanks to the improved results of first-line therapies and the availability of effective second- or third-line salvage therapies, alloHCT is reserved for selected high-risk patients and is considered a clinical option. For donor lymphocyte infusion, bortezomib or lenalidomide have been used as consolidation or maintenance therapies post-transplant—none has become standard of care. For those patients who relapse, the best treatment should be evaluated considering the patient’s clinical status and the previous lines of therapy. The use of newer drugs, such as monoclonal antibodies or other immunotherapies in the post-transplant setting, deserves further investigation. However, acceptable toxicity and a synergic effect with the newer immune system could be hopefully expected. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Therapies and Therapeutic Approaches in Multiple Myeloma)
15 pages, 1967 KiB  
Article
A Retrospective Comparison of DLI and gDLI for Post-Transplant Treatment
by Sylvain Lamure, Franciane Paul, Anne-Laure Gagez, Jérémy Delage, Laure Vincent, Nathalie Fegueux, Anne Sirvent, Eve Gehlkopf, Jean Luc Veyrune, Lu Zhao Yang, Tarik Kanouni, Valère Cacheux, Jérôme Moreaux, Beatrice Bonafoux, Guillaume Cartron, John De Vos and Patrice Ceballos
J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9(7), 2204; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9072204 - 12 Jul 2020
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 3446
Abstract
Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) is used to prevent or treat haematological malignancies relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). Recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulated factor primed DLI (gDLI) is derived from frozen aliquots of the peripheral blood stem cell collection. We compared the efficacy [...] Read more.
Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) is used to prevent or treat haematological malignancies relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). Recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulated factor primed DLI (gDLI) is derived from frozen aliquots of the peripheral blood stem cell collection. We compared the efficacy and safety of gDLI and classical DLI after allo-SCT. We excluded haploidentical allo-SCT. Initial diseases were acute myeloblastic leukaemia (n = 45), myeloma (n = 38), acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (n = 20), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (n = 10), myelodysplasia (n = 8), Hodgkin lymphoma (n = 8), chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (n = 7), chronic myeloid leukaemia (n = 2) and osteomyelofibrosis (n = 1). Indications for DLI were relapse (n = 96) or pre-emptive treatment (n = 43). Sixty-eight patients had classical DLI and 71 had gDLI. The response rate was 38.2%, the 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 38% (29–48) and the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 37% (29–47). Graft versus host disease rate was 46.7% and 10.1% of patients died from toxicity. There were no differences between classical DLI and gDLI in terms of response (p = 0.28), 5-year PFS (p = 0.90), 5-year OS (p. 0.50), GvHD (p = 0.86), treated GvHD (p = 0.81) and cause of mortality (p. 0.14). In conclusion, this study points out no major effectiveness or toxicity of gDLI compared to classical DLI. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Hematology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

36 pages, 7988 KiB  
Review
2,4 Dinitrophenol as Medicine
by John G. Geisler
Cells 2019, 8(3), 280; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells8030280 - 23 Mar 2019
Cited by 84 | Viewed by 32195
Abstract
In the sanctity of pure drug discovery, objective reasoning can become clouded when pursuing ideas that appear unorthodox, but are spot on physiologically. To put this into historical perspective, it was an unorthodox idea in the 1950’s to suggest that warfarin, a rat [...] Read more.
In the sanctity of pure drug discovery, objective reasoning can become clouded when pursuing ideas that appear unorthodox, but are spot on physiologically. To put this into historical perspective, it was an unorthodox idea in the 1950’s to suggest that warfarin, a rat poison, could be repositioned into a breakthrough drug in humans to protect against strokes as a blood thinner. Yet it was approved in 1954 as Coumadin® and has been prescribed to billions of patients as a standard of care. Similarly, no one can forget the horrific effects of thalidomide, prescribed or available without a prescription, as both a sleeping pill and “morning sickness” anti-nausea medication targeting pregnant women in the 1950’s. The “thalidomide babies” became the case-in-point for the need of strict guidelines by the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) or full multi-species teratogenicity testing before drug approval. More recently it was found that thalidomide is useful in graft versus host disease, leprosy and resistant tuberculosis treatment, and as an anti-angiogenesis agent as a breakthrough drug for multiple myeloma (except for pregnant female patients). Decades of diabetes drug discovery research has historically focused on every possible angle, except, the energy-out side of the equation, namely, raising mitochondrial energy expenditure with chemical uncouplers. The idea of “social responsibility” allowed energy-in agents to be explored and the portfolio is robust with medicines of insulin sensitizers, insulin analogues, secretagogues, SGLT2 inhibitors, etc., but not energy-out medicines. The primary reason? It appeared unorthodox, to return to exploring a drug platform used in the 1930s in over 100,000 obese patients used for weight loss. This is over 80-years ago and prior to Dr Peter Mitchell explaining the mechanism of how mitochondrial uncouplers, like 2,4-dinitrophenol (DNP) even worked by three decades later in 1961. Although there is a clear application for metabolic disease, it was not until recently that this platform was explored for its merit at very low, weight-neutral doses, for treating insidious human illnesses and completely unrelated to weight reduction. It is known that mitochondrial uncouplers specifically target the entire organelle’s physiology non-genomically. It has been known for years that many neuromuscular and neurodegenerative diseases are associated with overt production of reactive oxygen species (ROSs), a rise in isoprostanes (biomarker of mitochondrial ROSs in urine or blood) and poor calcium (Ca2+) handing. It has also been known that mitochondrial uncouplers lower ROS production and Ca2+ overload. There is evidence that elevation of isoprostanes precedes disease onset, in Alzheimer’s Disease (AD). It is also curious, why so many neurodegenerative diseases of known and unknown etiology start at mid-life or later, such as Multiple Sclerosis (MS), Huntington Disease (HD), AD, Parkinson Disease, and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS). Is there a relationship to a buildup of mutations that are sequestered over time due to ROSs exceeding the rate of repair? If ROS production were managed, could disease onset due to aging be delayed or prevented? Is it possible that most, if not all neurodegenerative diseases are manifested through mitochondrial dysfunction? Although DNP, a historic mitochondrial uncoupler, was used in the 1930s at high doses for obesity in well over 100,000 humans, and so far, it has never been an FDA-approved drug. This review will focus on the application of using DNP, but now, repositioned as a potential disease-modifying drug for a legion of insidious diseases at much lower and paradoxically, weight neutral doses. DNP will be addressed as a treatment for “metabesity”, an emerging term related to the global comorbidities associated with the over-nutritional phenotype; obesity, diabetes, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular disease, but including neurodegenerative disorders and accelerated aging. Some unexpected drug findings will be discussed, such as DNP’s induction of neurotrophic growth factors involved in neuronal heath, learning and cognition. For the first time in 80’s years, the FDA has granted (to Mitochon Pharmaceutical, Inc., Blue Bell, PA, USA) an open Investigational New Drug (IND) approval to begin rigorous clinical testing of DNP for safety and tolerability, including for the first ever, pharmacokinetic profiling in humans. Successful completion of Phase I clinical trial will open the door to explore the merits of DNP as a possible treatment of people with many truly unmet medical needs, including those suffering from HD, MS, PD, AD, ALS, Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD), and Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI). Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Intracellular and Plasma Membranes)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 1101 KiB  
Article
Immunomodulation Induced by Stem Cell Mobilization and Harvesting in Healthy Donors: Increased Systemic Osteopontin Levels after Treatment with Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor
by Guro Kristin Melve, Elisabeth Ersvaer, Çiğdem Akalın Akkök, Aymen Bushra Ahmed, Einar K. Kristoffersen, Tor Hervig and Øystein Bruserud
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17(7), 1158; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17071158 - 19 Jul 2016
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 5048
Abstract
Peripheral blood stem cells from healthy donors mobilized by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and harvested by leukapheresis are commonly used for allogeneic stem cell transplantation. The frequency of severe graft versus host disease is similar for patients receiving peripheral blood and bone marrow [...] Read more.
Peripheral blood stem cells from healthy donors mobilized by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and harvested by leukapheresis are commonly used for allogeneic stem cell transplantation. The frequency of severe graft versus host disease is similar for patients receiving peripheral blood and bone marrow allografts, even though the blood grafts contain more T cells, indicating mobilization-related immunoregulatory effects. The regulatory phosphoprotein osteopontin was quantified in plasma samples from healthy donors before G-CSF treatment, after four days of treatment immediately before and after leukapheresis, and 18–24 h after apheresis. Myeloma patients received chemotherapy, combined with G-CSF, for stem cell mobilization and plasma samples were prepared immediately before, immediately after, and 18–24 h after leukapheresis. G-CSF treatment of healthy stem cell donors increased plasma osteopontin levels, and a further increase was seen immediately after leukapheresis. The pre-apheresis levels were also increased in myeloma patients compared to healthy individuals. Finally, in vivo G-CSF exposure did not alter T cell expression of osteopontin ligand CD44, and in vitro osteopontin exposure induced only small increases in anti-CD3- and anti-CD28-stimulated T cell proliferation. G-CSF treatment, followed by leukapheresis, can increase systemic osteopontin levels, and this effect may contribute to the immunomodulatory effects of G-CSF treatment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Cell Transplantation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop