Search Results (5)

This study compares gold-backed and conventional cryptocurrencies in terms of dependence structures and hedging effectiveness relative to precious metals. Daily data for gold, silver, cryptocurrencies, gold-backed cryptocurrencies, and USD-backed stablecoins from July 2020 to March 2026 are analyzed using a multivariate stochastic volatility framework with a grouped factor structure. Gold-backed cryptocurrencies move closely with gold and silver and provide meaningful hedging benefits. Conventional cryptocurrencies present weaker and less stable relationships with precious metals, reducing hedging potential. Important differences emerge between gold and silver, suggesting that precious metals should not be treated as a homogeneous asset class. Gold-backed cryptocurrencies appear much more closely aligned with precious metals than conventional cryptocurrencies. Additional analyses show that hedging effectiveness increases substantially during periods of elevated volatility, particularly for PAXG and XAUT, indicating stronger risk-reduction benefits under stressed market conditions. Robustness tests using SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) confirm the stability of the main findings. The findings are relevant for portfolio diversification, hedging decisions, and risk management. Full article

This research article explores whether the climate transition risk (CTR) and climate physical risk (CPR) transmit greater shocks towards the sustainable, gold-backed, energy-related and Sharia-compliant cryptocurrencies during bullish market conditions as compared with the normal and bearish market conditions. We employ the novel quantile vector auto-regression (QVAR)-based connectivity framework. Overall findings suggested that CPR and CTR transmitted greater shocks towards cryptocurrency classes during extremely high and lower quantiles as compared with the median quantile. This U-shaped and non-linear climate risks shock transmission indicates that Sharia-compliant, energy-related and gold-backed cryptocurrencies become more vulnerable during extreme market conditions (higher and lower quantiles) and may not consistently serve as reliable hedging or diversification instruments, particularly during periods of heightened climate uncertainty. Overall findings suggested that both the CPR and CTR transmitted greater shocks towards energy-related, gold-backed, and Sharia-compliant cryptocurrencies as compared with the sustainable cryptocurrencies, across all the quantiles. Therefore, sustainable cryptocurrencies, particularly those with energy-efficient consensus mechanisms such as Stellar, Cardano and Ripple, exhibited resilience to climate risks and can therefore function as stabilizing core holdings in diversified portfolios. Fund managers should incorporate a rebalancing strategy that increases allocation to these climate-resilient, sustainable digital assets during periods of elevated climate risk. Fund managers should integrate CPR and CTR into the quantile-domain forecasting frameworks for predicting digital asset market returns to enhance financial stability. Portfolio managers should undertake dynamic and quantile-contingent climate risk hedging strategies that account for tail-risk exposure rather than relying on average market behavior. Full article

This study examines the dynamic interconnectedness between digital and traditional assets, with an emphasis on fiat currencies (such as JPY/USD and CHF/USD), cryptocurrencies (such as Bitcoin), and digital assets backed by gold (such as Tether Gold and Digix Gold Token) under various economic conditions. The study uses sophisticated techniques, including dynamic connectedness, quantile connectedness, and time-frequency connectedness analyses, to test non-linear and asymmetric interactions between various asset classes. The findings reveal that while cryptocurrencies, especially Bitcoin, frequently serve as net recipients of shocks during times of economic instability, gold and gold-backed assets are the primary shock transmitters. These findings highlight the increasing importance that digital assets play amid economic and geopolitical crises as well as their growing incorporation into the larger financial ecosystem. The study contributes to the literature on asset interconnection and provides implications for systemic risk management and financial stability; specifically, it offers insightful information for hedging and portfolio diversification techniques. Full article

This study aims to investigate the performance and behavior of fiat- and gold-backed cryptocurrencies to support stakeholders through the preparation of a portfolio from 1 January 2021 to 30 June 2022. Moreover, while searching for a hedge or a diversifier to construct a less risky portfolio with handsome returns, the prices of fiat-backed cryptocurrencies report high fluctuation during the sample period. ARIMA-EGARCH models have been employed to examine the volatile behavior of these cryptocurrencies. The empirical results are mixed as Bitcoin has been highly volatile during the economic recession. Due to its volatility, investors seek a safe haven. Ripple, on the other hand, shows low risk compared to Bitcoin. The results further reveal that PAX gold is more volatile than PM gold, while Bitcoin, being a highly traded cryptocurrency, is significantly correlated to other cryptocurrencies. The implications of this research showing the volatility of gold- and fiat-backed cryptocurrencies are equally important to stakeholders, such as investors, and policymakers. Full article

The pandemic crisis of COVID-19 hit the financial markets like a shockwave on 16 March 2020. This paper attempts to capture which ‘safe assets’ asset managers could have fled during the first wave of the pandemic. From an investment manager’s perspective, candidate assets are stocks, bonds, exchange rates, commodities, gold, and (gold-backed) cryptocurrencies. Empirical tests of the ‘Safe-Haven’ hypothesis are conducted, upon which the selection of assets is performed. The methodological framework hinges on the Global Minimum Variance Portfolio with Monte Carlo simulations, and the routine is performed under Python. Other optimization techniques, such as risk parity and equal weighting, are added for robustness checks. The benchmark portfolio hits a yearly profitability of 7.2% during such a stressful event (with 3.6% downside risk). The profitability can be enhanced to 8.4% (even 14.4% during sub-periods) with a careful selection of ‘Safe assets’. Besides short- to long-term U.S. bonds, we document that investors’ exposure to Chinese, Argentinian, and Mexican stocks during COVID-19 could have been complemented with Swiss and Japanese currencies, grains, physical gold mine ETFs, or gold-backed tokens for defensive purposes. Full article