Search Results (4)

Geological mapping involves the identification of elements such as rocks, soils, and surface water, which are fundamental tasks in Geological Environment Remote Sensing (GERS) interpretation. High-precision intelligent interpretation technology can not only reduce labor requirements and significantly improve the efficiency of geological mapping but also assist geological disaster prevention assessment and resource exploration. However, the high interclass similarity, high intraclass variability, gradational boundaries, and complex distributional characteristics of GERS elements coupled with the difficulty of manual labeling and the interference of imaging noise, all limit the accuracy of DL-based methods in wide-area GERS interpretation. We propose a Transformer-based multi-stage and multi-scale fusion network, RSWFormer (Rock–Soil–Water Network with Transformer), for geological mapping of spatially large areas. RSWFormer first uses a Multi-stage Geosemantic Hierarchical Sampling (MGHS) module to extract geological information and high-dimensional features at different scales from local to global, and then uses a Multi-scale Geological Context Enhancement (MGCE) module to fuse geological semantic information at different scales to enhance the understanding of contextual semantics. The cascade of the two modules is designed to enhance the interpretation and performance of GERS elements in geologically complex areas. The high mountainous and hilly areas located in western China were selected as the research area. A multi-source geological remote sensing dataset containing diverse GERS feature categories and complex lithological characteristics, Multi-GL9, is constructed to fill the significant gaps in the datasets required for extensive GERS. Using overall accuracy as the evaluation index, RSWFormer achieves 92.15% and 80.23% on the Gaofen-2 and Landsat-8 datasets, respectively, surpassing existing methods. Experiments show that RSWFormer has excellent performance and wide applicability in geological mapping tasks. Full article

Distinct, alternative forms of geosemantics, whose classification is often ill-defined, emerge in the management of geospatial information. This paper proposes a workflow to identify patterns in the different practices and methods dealing with geoinformation. From a meta-review of the state of the art in geosemantics, this paper first pinpoints “keywords” representing key concepts, challenges, methods, and technologies. Then, we illustrate several case studies, following the categorization into implicit, formal, and powerful (i.e., soft) semantics depending on the kind of their input. Finally, we associate the case studies with the previously identified keywords and compute their similarities in order to ascertain if distinguishing methodologies, techniques, and challenges can be related to the three distinct forms of semantics. The outcomes of the analysis sheds some light on the diverse methods and technologies that are more suited to model and deal with specific forms of geosemantics. Full article

In geographic information science, semantic relatedness is important for Geographic Information Retrieval (GIR), Linked Geospatial Data, geoparsing, and geo-semantics. But computing the semantic similarity/relatedness of geographic terminology is still an urgent issue to tackle. The thesaurus is a ubiquitous and sophisticated knowledge representation tool existing in various domains. In this article, we combined the generic lexical database (WordNet or HowNet) with the Thesaurus for Geographic Science and proposed a thesaurus–lexical relatedness measure (TLRM) to compute the semantic relatedness of geographic terminology. This measure quantified the relationship between terminologies, interlinked the discrete term trees by using the generic lexical database, and realized the semantic relatedness computation of any two terminologies in the thesaurus. The TLRM was evaluated on a new relatedness baseline, namely, the Geo-Terminology Relatedness Dataset (GTRD) which was built by us, and the TLRM obtained a relatively high cognitive plausibility. Finally, we applied the TLRM on a geospatial data sharing portal to support data retrieval. The application results of the 30 most frequently used queries of the portal demonstrated that using TLRM could improve the recall of geospatial data retrieval in most situations and rank the retrieval results by the matching scores between the query of users and the geospatial dataset. Full article

This paper investigates recent research on active learning for (geo) text and image classification, with an emphasis on methods that combine visual analytics and/or deep learning. Deep learning has attracted substantial attention across many domains of science and practice, because it can find intricate patterns in big data; but successful application of the methods requires a big set of labeled data. Active learning, which has the potential to address the data labeling challenge, has already had success in geospatial applications such as trajectory classification from movement data and (geo) text and image classification. This review is intended to be particularly relevant for extension of these methods to GISience, to support work in domains such as geographic information retrieval from text and image repositories, interpretation of spatial language, and related geo-semantics challenges. Specifically, to provide a structure for leveraging recent advances, we group the relevant work into five categories: active learning, visual analytics, active learning with visual analytics, active deep learning, plus GIScience and Remote Sensing (RS) using active learning and active deep learning. Each category is exemplified by recent influential work. Based on this framing and our systematic review of key research, we then discuss some of the main challenges of integrating active learning with visual analytics and deep learning, and point out research opportunities from technical and application perspectives—for application-based opportunities, with emphasis on those that address big data with geospatial components. Full article