Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (1,465)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = gastrointestinal tumor

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
24 pages, 1107 KB  
Review
Interpreting Biomarker Discordance in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Beyond Fecal Calprotectin and C-Reactive Protein
by Lovre Martinovic, Roko Santic, Marko Kumric, Marino Vilovic, Dinko Martinovic and Josko Bozic
Biomedicines 2026, 14(9), 1883; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines14091883 - 24 Aug 2026
Abstract
Treat-to-target management in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) combines symptoms, fecal and serum biomarkers, endoscopy, histology, and cross-sectional imaging, but these measures frequently diverge. Discordance may reflect analytical variation, timing, disease location, phenotype, comorbidity, or partially non-overlapping biological processes. We performed a critical narrative [...] Read more.
Treat-to-target management in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) combines symptoms, fecal and serum biomarkers, endoscopy, histology, and cross-sectional imaging, but these measures frequently diverge. Discordance may reflect analytical variation, timing, disease location, phenotype, comorbidity, or partially non-overlapping biological processes. We performed a critical narrative review using a structured PubMed/MEDLINE search, supplemented by citation chaining and publisher searches. Guidelines, systematic reviews, diagnostic studies, cohorts, randomized trials, and selected mechanistic studies were prioritized. Fecal calprotectin (FC) and lactoferrin primarily reflect intestinal neutrophilic inflammation, whereas C-reactive protein (CRP) and related serum indices reflect a nonlocalizing systemic response. The fecal immunochemical test (FIT) detects gastrointestinal bleeding, and leucine-rich alpha-2 glycoprotein (LRG) remains promising but insufficiently standardized. We distinguish five biological biomarker domains—namely, fecal–neutrophil; serum–systemic; epithelial/barrier; restitution/resolution; and fibrosis/extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling—from symptoms and clinical indices, pharmacologic measurements, and phenotype-directed reference assessments. Circulating barrier, repair, and matrix-turnover markers remain investigational. Reactive therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents has the most mature evidence. Vedolizumab and ustekinumab show exposure–response associations, but actionable thresholds are unvalidated, and clinical TDM is not established for newer biologics or oral small molecules. After objective confirmation of disease activity, the framework may support phenotype-directed therapeutic decisions but is not a validated algorithm. Clinically important disagreement should prompt assessment of sampling, assay, timing, infection, medication-related confounding, and pretest probability before phenotype-directed endoscopy, histology, imaging, or reactive TDM is selected. A single discordant result should neither trigger treatment escalation nor exclude active or structural disease. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1180 KB  
Article
Selective Internal Radiation Therapy (SIRT) for SDH-Deficient GIST Demonstrates Encouraging Durable Response Rates: An International Multicenter Case Series
by Zachary T. Berman, Peter Hohenberger, Ramesh Bulusu, Steven C. Rose, Paul T. Fanta, Jonathan Evans, Steffen Diehl, Franka Menge, Nasim Ali and Jason K. Sicklick
Cancers 2026, 18(16), 2704; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18162704 - 20 Aug 2026
Viewed by 166
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Succinate dehydrogenase (SDH)-deficient gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are a rare subgroup of GISTs and respond poorly to conventional systemic therapies. This study describes long-term outcomes after yttrium-90 (Y-90) selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) for progression of unresectable SDH-deficient GIST hepatic metastases. Methods: [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Succinate dehydrogenase (SDH)-deficient gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are a rare subgroup of GISTs and respond poorly to conventional systemic therapies. This study describes long-term outcomes after yttrium-90 (Y-90) selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) for progression of unresectable SDH-deficient GIST hepatic metastases. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of consecutive patients treated with SIRT at three tertiary referral centers in Europe and the United States. Data collection included demographics, tumor profiling, prior therapies, Y-90 dosimetry approach, imaging response, adverse events, and long-term outcomes. Results: Twelve patients (66.7% female) with a median age of 27 years (range, 17–57 years) were included. One patient had a complete response (8.3%) and seven had partial responses (58.3%) by modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Four patients (33.3%) had tumor shrinkage that did not meet partial response criteria. The objective response rate was 66.7%, with a disease control rate of 100%. One grade 3 or higher adverse event was observed (cholecystitis requiring cholecystectomy). At a median follow-up of 32 months (range, 3–77 months), two patients experienced disease progression. Median overall survival was not reached, with one death during follow-up. Conclusions: SIRT appears safe and effective for patients with progressive, unresectable SDH-deficient GIST hepatic metastases, with durable responses and limited serious toxicity. These findings suggest that SDH-deficient GIST may be more sensitive to radiation than previously appreciated and that SIRT may be a useful liver-directed approach for patients with limited systemic options. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Methods and Technologies Development)
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 3008 KB  
Review
Interventional Endoscopic Ultrasound in Gastroenterology: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis (2001–2024)
by Koji Takahashi, Noa Minami, Kohei Horie, Taiga Sudo, Nana Yamada, Terunao Iwanaga, Takafumi Sakuma and Hidehiro Kamezaki
Clin. Pract. 2026, 16(8), 153; https://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract16080153 - 20 Aug 2026
Viewed by 106
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Interventional endoscopic ultrasound (I-EUS) has evolved from a diagnostic imaging modality into a transformative therapeutic platform encompassing biliary drainage, pancreatic interventions, luminal bypass, pain management, and ablative therapies. Despite the rapid proliferation of I-EUS research, a comprehensive bibliometric analysis characterizing the [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Interventional endoscopic ultrasound (I-EUS) has evolved from a diagnostic imaging modality into a transformative therapeutic platform encompassing biliary drainage, pancreatic interventions, luminal bypass, pain management, and ablative therapies. Despite the rapid proliferation of I-EUS research, a comprehensive bibliometric analysis characterizing the global intellectual architecture of this field is lacking. Methods: A Web of Science Core Collection search identified 4340 records, of which 2237 were included (2001–2024), analyzed with R bibliometrix (version 5.0) and VOSviewer (version 1.6.20). Results: Publication output demonstrated three distinct phases with pronounced acceleration from 2017. The United States led global output (n = 625, 27.9%), followed by Japan (n = 435, 19.4%) and Italy (n = 166, 7.42%). At the continental level, Asia collectively produced the largest share of output (n = 884, 39.5% of the total corpus), exceeding the Americas (n = 687, 30.7%) and Europe (n = 492, 22.0%). Gastrointestinal Endoscopy was the most productive journal (n = 173). Tokyo Medical University was the most productive institution (n = 93, 4.16%). Four thematic clusters were identified: EUS-guided biliary and pancreatic ductal drainage; diagnostic, ablative, and injection EUS for pancreatic tumors; LAMS-enabled luminal bypass and gallbladder drainage; and pancreatic fluid collections and necrotizing pancreatitis. Temporal overlay confirmed EUS-guided gastroenterostomy, EUS-guided gallbladder drainage, and EUS-guided radiofrequency ablation as the leading research frontiers. Annual output showed no discernible contraction during the COVID-19 pandemic period (2020–2021). Conclusions: The United States led global I-EUS research output with higher rates of international collaboration compared with East Asian nations, although Asia as a continent generated the largest aggregate volume of publications. EUS-guided biliary drainage and pancreatic fluid collection management constitute the established, high-volume core of the field, while EUS-guided gastroenterostomy and novel ablative technologies represent the most dynamic investigative frontiers. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 11487 KB  
Article
Integrated Analysis of Multiple Databases Identifies Tissue Inhibitor of Metalloproteinase 1 Expression and Its Association with the Immune Microenvironment in Colorectal Cancer
by Yun Xie, Jun Li, Zuwei Yan and Wenguang Zhang
Genes 2026, 17(8), 977; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes17080977 - 20 Aug 2026
Viewed by 218
Abstract
Background: In recent decades, the incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) has been rising worldwide. CRC ranks second in cancer-related mortality. The identification of reliable biomarkers for early diagnosis and prognosis prediction, along with a deeper understanding of the underlying molecular events, holds substantial [...] Read more.
Background: In recent decades, the incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) has been rising worldwide. CRC ranks second in cancer-related mortality. The identification of reliable biomarkers for early diagnosis and prognosis prediction, along with a deeper understanding of the underlying molecular events, holds substantial promise for improving patient outcomes. The tissue inhibitor of the metalloproteinase 1 (TIMP1) gene is overexpressed in various gastrointestinal malignancies and contributes to tumor progression. However, its role in regulating the CRC tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) and its potential as a clinically actionable prognostic biomarker remain unclear. Methods: To probe how TIMP1 acts as a prognosis-related candidate biomarker in colorectal carcinoma, TCGA-derived datasets were adopted to conduct Kaplan–Meier survival assessment. We also investigated the connection between the expression abundance of TIMP1 and the infiltration of immune populations and intratumoral lymphocytes; furthermore, immune checkpoint-related genes were systematically assessed across multiple tumor types via the TISIDB and TIMER2.0 platforms, with particular emphasis on CRC. We adopted the ESTIMATE scoring system to figure out how TIMP1 gene expression correlates with the phenotypic properties of the colorectal-cancer TIME. We relied on the limma toolkit for the screening of differential transcripts from high-TIMP1 and low-TIMP1 cohorts. Enrichment assessments covering Gene Ontology terms and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes entries were then carried out to predict the potential biological pathways associated with TIMP1. We constructed the protein–protein interaction map for TIMP1-interacting partners via the STRING repository. To further explore TIMP1-correlated genes, we performed Venn diagram intersection analysis combined with Spearman’s correlation test. Finally, quantitative reverse-transcription PCR was then implemented to detect TIMP1 messenger-RNA abundance inside the RKO colorectal carcinoma cell line as well as normal colonic epithelial CCD-18Co cells, which offered in vitro experimental verification for our bioinformatic outcomes. Results: According to outcome data, TIMP1 transcripts were markedly up-regulated in CRC specimens and cell lines relative to normal samples. Elevated TIMP1 expression served as a poor-prognosis indicator for overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.29–0.64, p < 0.001) and disease-specific survival (HR = 0.39, 95% CI = 0.22–0.68, p = 0.001) among colorectal-carcinoma patients. TIMP1-high and TIMP1-low groups exhibited notable differences in immune cell infiltration (CD8+ T, macrophage, mast, neutrophil, B, monocyte, dendritic, and CD4+ T cells). TIMP1 expression was also significantly correlated with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, key immune checkpoint genes (e.g., CD274 [PD-L1] and CTLA4), and immunomodulatory chemokines (e.g., CCL3 and CCL5). Twelve TIMP1-interacting DEGs were selected: COL5A1, FN1, PRG4, and a cluster of nine MMPs (MMP1/2/3/7/8/9/11/13/14), all of which showed significant positive correlations with TIMP1 (r = 0.31–0.63, all p < 0.001). Conclusions: TIMP1 expression correlates with features of the tumor immune microenvironment and extracellular matrix remodeling in CRC, suggesting that TIMP1 shows potential as a candidate biomarker. However, its potential as a therapeutic target warrants further experimental investigation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Human Genomics and Genetic Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

52 pages, 19677 KB  
Review
Biological and Targeted Therapies in the Multidisciplinary Management of Gastrointestinal Cancers
by Marek Kos, Krzysztof Bojarski, Milena Czosnek, Jan Śnieżyński, Bartosz Wilczyński, Paulina Mertowska, Ewelina Grywalska and Sebastian Mertowski
Cancers 2026, 18(16), 2675; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18162675 - 18 Aug 2026
Viewed by 180
Abstract
Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers represent a diverse group of malignancies that remain a major cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality worldwide. Their management is increasingly complex, reflecting differences in tumor biology, anatomical location, stage, and molecular profile. In recent years, advances in molecular diagnostics, [...] Read more.
Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers represent a diverse group of malignancies that remain a major cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality worldwide. Their management is increasingly complex, reflecting differences in tumor biology, anatomical location, stage, and molecular profile. In recent years, advances in molecular diagnostics, immunotherapy, and targeted treatment have moved clinical decision-making beyond a purely organ- and stage-based approach toward more individualized, biomarker-guided care. This narrative review summarizes established and emerging biological and targeted therapies used in esophageal, gastric and gastroesophageal junction, colorectal, pancreatic, hepatocellular, and biliary tract cancers. It focuses on immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting PD-1, PD-L1, and CTLA-4; HER2-directed monoclonal antibodies and antibody–drug conjugates; antiangiogenic and anti-EGFR therapies; and newer strategies involving CLDN18.2, FGFR2b, and tumor-agnostic alterations such as NTRK fusions. The review also considers the predictive biomarkers used to guide treatment selection and the growing integration of systemic therapy with surgery in neoadjuvant, perioperative, adjuvant, and conversion settings. However, clinical efficacy alone does not determine whether new treatments become part of routine practice. Regulatory approval, reimbursement, access to molecular testing, and the availability of specialized multidisciplinary care are equally important. The rapidly evolving treatment landscape for GI cancers therefore requires clinical decisions that account for tumor biology, anatomical resectability, molecular eligibility, expected benefit, treatment-related toxicity, and local access to therapy. Expanding access to comprehensive biomarker testing and effective molecularly guided treatments will be essential to translate progress in precision oncology into more personalized and equitable care for patients with GI cancers. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

28 pages, 2309 KB  
Review
Non-Coding RNAs in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: Regulatory Networks, Drug Resistance, and Clinical Implications
by Georgios Mandrakis, Stavros P. Papadakos, Georgia Levidou, Panoraia Keratsa, Maria-Ioanna Christodoulou and Stamatios Theocharis
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27(16), 7286; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27167286 - 15 Aug 2026
Viewed by 242
Abstract
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract and are usually driven by activating mutations in KIT or PDGFRA. Although these alterations define the core molecular biology of GISTs and guide targeted therapy, they do not fully [...] Read more.
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract and are usually driven by activating mutations in KIT or PDGFRA. Although these alterations define the core molecular biology of GISTs and guide targeted therapy, they do not fully explain the variability observed in tumor behavior, recurrence risk, or response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs), including microRNAs (miRNAs), long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), and circular RNAs (circRNAs), have been increasingly studied as regulators of gene expression in GISTs. Recent evidence suggests that these molecules may influence KIT-centered signaling, autophagy, apoptosis, invasion, angiogenesis, and drug resistance. However, the strength of evidence differs considerably across individual ncRNAs, ranging from bioinformatic associations to functional validation in cell lines and in vivo models. This review summarizes current knowledge on ncRNA-mediated regulation in GIST biology, with emphasis on tumor progression, therapeutic resistance, and possible clinical relevance. Rather than treating ncRNAs as isolated biomarkers, they function as part of broader regulatory networks that interact with oncogenic signaling and epigenetic mechanisms. Although several ncRNAs appear promising as prognostic or predictive candidates, further validation in independent clinical cohorts is required before their integration into routine risk stratification or treatment decision-making. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1104 KB  
Article
Oligometastatic GIST: Impact of Treatment Modalities and Metastatic Distribution on Overall Survival
by Winston Hayes Pearce, Nikita Sharma, Leonardo Simonelli, Maiya-Mari Messina, Tanner Hill, Yu-Cherng Channing Chang, Mohammad Saleh, Emily Jonczak, Andrew E. Rosenberg, Nipun Merchant, Alan S. Livingstone, Dido Franceschi, Caitlin A. Hester, Julie Grossman and Francesco Alessandrino
Cancers 2026, 18(16), 2622; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18162622 - 14 Aug 2026
Viewed by 251
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Oligometastatic GIST, defined in this study as five or fewer metastatic lesions confined to a single organ, represents a distinct subset with a lower metastatic burden than widely metastatic disease and may have different prognostic and therapeutic considerations. Methods: We [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Oligometastatic GIST, defined in this study as five or fewer metastatic lesions confined to a single organ, represents a distinct subset with a lower metastatic burden than widely metastatic disease and may have different prognostic and therapeutic considerations. Methods: We reviewed biopsy-proven oligometastatic GIST diagnosed between August 1998 and June 2025 from a prospectively maintained institutional database, collecting genomic, metastatic, treatment, ethnicity, and survival data. Overall survival (OS), calculated from diagnosis of oligometastatic disease, was estimated by Kaplan–Meier analysis and compared using the log-rank test. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression. Results: Of 525 subjects with GIST in our database, 96 (18.3%) had oligometastatic GIST (median age: 54 years; median OS from diagnosis of oligometastatic disease: 9.77 years). Most tested tumors were KIT-positive (91.6%), predominantly harboring KIT exon 11 alterations (69.5%). The most common metastatic sites were the liver (n = 44) and peritoneum (n = 37). Overall, 58 patients underwent surgery, including 55 cytoreductive procedures and 3 emergent operations for bleeding or obstruction. Among the cytoreductive procedures, indications included multifocal disease after tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) response (n = 21), unifocal disease after TKI response (n = 18), unifocal progression on TKI (n = 13), and equivocal or undocumented TKI response (n = 3). Overall survival did not differ by liver versus peritoneal metastases (HR: 1.27; 95% CI, 0.59–2.70; p = 0.540) or Hispanic versus non-Hispanic ethnicity (HR: 0.81; 95% CI, 0.34–1.90; p = 0.624). Cytoreductive surgery combined with systemic therapy was associated with longer overall survival than systemic therapy alone (10.8 vs. 7.4 years; HR: 0.44; 95% CI, 0.22–0.89; p = 0.019). Conclusions: In this retrospective cohort, cytoreductive surgery combined with systemic therapy was associated with longer overall survival than systemic therapy alone. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue News and How Much to Improve in Management of Soft Tissue Sarcomas)
Show Figures

Figure 1

28 pages, 2807 KB  
Review
Mechanisms for Enhancing Radiosensitivity in Esophageal Cancer
by Dongli Guo, Jing Jin, Xin Su, Wanyu Yang, Bin Guo, Wenpeng Jiao and Yutong He
Cancers 2026, 18(16), 2610; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18162610 - 13 Aug 2026
Viewed by 287
Abstract
Esophageal cancer is a common malignancy of the upper gastrointestinal tract that is associated with high incidence and mortality rates. Radiotherapy constitutes a cornerstone therapeutic modality for esophageal cancer. In radiotherapy, ionizing radiation is used to eliminate tumor cells through direct DNA damage [...] Read more.
Esophageal cancer is a common malignancy of the upper gastrointestinal tract that is associated with high incidence and mortality rates. Radiotherapy constitutes a cornerstone therapeutic modality for esophageal cancer. In radiotherapy, ionizing radiation is used to eliminate tumor cells through direct DNA damage and indirect reactive oxygen species (ROS)-mediated effects. However, clinical outcomes are frequently limited by interpatient heterogeneity and intrinsic tumor radioresistance. This review systematically describes the determinants of radiosensitivity in esophageal cancer within the established radiobiological framework of the “6Rs”: DNA damage repair (Repair), which is mediated by γ-H2AX phosphorylation, PARP family enzymes, and nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination (HR) pathways; cell cycle redistribution (Redistribution), which is regulated by G1/S and G2/M checkpoint dynamics; tumor repopulation (Repopulation), which is driven by cancer stem cell activity during fractionated treatment; reoxygenation (Reoxygenation), which is modulated through HIF-1α signaling and ROS homeostasis; intrinsic radiosensitivity (Radiosensitivity), which reflects interindividual and histopathological variability; and reactivation of antitumor immune responses (Reactivation), which enhances efficacy by remodeling the tumor immune microenvironment. Furthermore, regulated cell death mechanisms, including ferroptosis, autophagy, and apoptosis, significantly modulate radiotherapeutic responses. Elucidating these interconnected mechanisms provides a robust theoretical foundation for developing targeted interventions, identifying predictive biomarkers, and advancing precision radiotherapy strategies to optimize clinical outcomes for patients with esophageal cancer. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cancer Therapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

31 pages, 1192 KB  
Review
Next-Generation Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Gastrointestinal Cancers: Mechanisms, Resistance, and Emerging Therapeutic Strategies
by Mariam Ismail, Zaid Alabed, Khaled Alhallaq, Ebtesam Al-Najjar, Nour Mustafa, Yacoub Aldroubi, Yazan Hamdaneh and Abdullah Esmail
Cancers 2026, 18(16), 2593; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18162593 - 12 Aug 2026
Viewed by 395
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have significantly changed the treatment landscape of several gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies, particularly microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) and mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) tumors. However, most GI cancers remain resistant to current PD-1/PD-L1-based immunotherapy because of complex and highly suppressive tumor microenvironments characterized [...] Read more.
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have significantly changed the treatment landscape of several gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies, particularly microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) and mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) tumors. However, most GI cancers remain resistant to current PD-1/PD-L1-based immunotherapy because of complex and highly suppressive tumor microenvironments characterized by immune stromal exclusion, myeloid-driven immune suppression, defective antigen presentation, and adaptive immune resistance mechanisms. Emerging evidence suggests that alternative inhibitory pathways, including lymphocyte activation gene-3 (LAG-3), T-cell immunoreceptor with immunoglobulin and ITIM domain (TIGIT), T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin-domain containing-3 (TIM-3), and V-domain Ig suppressor of T-cell activation (VISTA), contribute substantially to persistent T-cell dysfunction and resistance to checkpoint blockade. This review summarizes the immune landscape of GI malignancies and discusses the biological mechanisms underlying resistance to current ICIs. We highlight the evolving role of next-generation immune checkpoints, ongoing clinical development of novel inhibitors, and emerging combination strategies involving chemotherapy, anti-angiogenic therapy, radiation, bispecific antibodies, and tumor microenvironment modulation. In addition, we discuss current limitations in biomarker development and the growing role of circulating tumor DNA, spatial immune profiling, and multi-omics approaches in patient selection. Finally, we explore future directions aimed at improving precision immunotherapy and expanding durable responses across GI cancers. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers in the Section “Cancer Therapy” in 2025-2026)
Show Figures

Figure 1

36 pages, 1175 KB  
Review
Circulating Tumor DNA for Minimal Residual Disease Detection and Recurrence Prediction in Upper Gastrointestinal Cancers: A Scoping Review
by Loizos Hadjigeorgiou, Melina Yerolatsite, Nanteznta Torounidou, George Zarkavelis, Dimitrios Schizas, Vasileios Tatsis, Stefano Rausei, Konstantinos Vlachos and Georgios D. Lianos
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(16), 6222; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15166222 - 11 Aug 2026
Viewed by 246
Abstract
Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a promising non-invasive biomarker for detecting minimal residual disease (MRD) and predicting recurrence after curative treatment, yet evidence in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), and gastric cancer has largely been examined within individual tumor types. [...] Read more.
Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a promising non-invasive biomarker for detecting minimal residual disease (MRD) and predicting recurrence after curative treatment, yet evidence in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), and gastric cancer has largely been examined within individual tumor types. In this scoping review, we mapped this evidence across all three malignancies and clarified key methodological and clinical considerations. Following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines, we searched PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library (3 April 2026) for studies linking ctDNA to disease-free, recurrence-free, or overall survival after curative-intent treatment. Twenty-seven studies (1746 patients; 10 ESCC, 4 EAC, 8 gastric, and 5 mixed) were included. Across every tumor type, postoperative ctDNA MRD was the most informative timepoint, with independent multivariable hazard ratios for disease-free, recurrence-free, or event-free survival of 2.8 to 21.8, whereas preoperative ctDNA was seldom prognostic. Serial monitoring further improved performance and flagged recurrence 78 to 278 days before imaging. Tumor-informed assays showed higher sensitivity than tumor-agnostic ones (80% vs. 35%), though direct comparisons were limited; correction for clonal hematopoiesis was essential for tumor-agnostic assays, and blood-based assays performed poorly in diffuse-type and peritoneal disease. Postoperative ctDNA MRD is a consistent, independent prognostic biomarker across upper gastrointestinal cancers that adds prognostic information beyond conventional staging and pathological response, supporting prospective interventional trials of ctDNA-guided management. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 675 KB  
Article
Surgical Approaches for Primary Gastric GIST After the Introduction of Robotic Surgery: A 10-Year Single-Center Experience
by Julia Michel, Jens Hoeppner, Michael Leitz, Fabian Nimczewski and Zsolt Madarasz
Cancers 2026, 18(16), 2562; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18162562 - 10 Aug 2026
Viewed by 246
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Robotic surgery offers an additional minimally invasive option for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) resection, particularly in anatomically demanding locations. Evidence regarding its integration into routine surgical practice remains limited. This study evaluated the evolution of surgical approaches for primary localized gastric [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Robotic surgery offers an additional minimally invasive option for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) resection, particularly in anatomically demanding locations. Evidence regarding its integration into routine surgical practice remains limited. This study evaluated the evolution of surgical approaches for primary localized gastric GIST following the introduction of an institutional robotic program. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 44 consecutive patients who underwent curative-intent resection for primary localized gastric GIST at a tertiary referral center between July 2015 and June 2025. Surgical management and perioperative outcomes were described for an early era (2015–2021; n = 29) and a later era after the introduction of robotic surgery (2022–2025; n = 15). Results: Overall, 22 procedures were completed laparoscopically, six robotically, and 13 through a primary open approach; three laparoscopic procedures were converted to open surgery. In the later era, robotic surgery accounted for 40.0% of resections, and no conversions occurred. The proportion of completed minimally invasive resections was 62.1% in the early era and 66.7% in the later era. R0 resection was achieved in all patients, and no tumor rupture was documented. Median operative time was 73.5 min, median postoperative length of stay was 7.5 days, and major morbidity occurred in six patients (13.6%). One patient (2.3%) died from sepsis within 30 days after reoperation for a postoperative gastric suture-line leak. Conclusions: Following the introduction of robotic surgery, management of primary gastric GIST evolved toward a more diversified and individualized surgical strategy. Robotic surgery was incorporated as an additional minimally invasive option, while the overall proportion of completed minimally invasive resections remained stable. These findings represent an early institutional experience and do not establish equivalence or comparative superiority among surgical approaches. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgery in Gastrointestinal Cancers)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 682 KB  
Case Report
Malakoplakia in Immunocompromised Hosts: A Case Series and Literature Review
by Ahmed Bishara, Huma Saeed, Layan Akkielah, Noor BuMurah, David K. Driman, Michael Silverman and Reza Rahimi Shahmirzadi
Diseases 2026, 14(8), 284; https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases14080284 - 8 Aug 2026
Viewed by 382
Abstract
Background: Malakoplakia is a rare chronic granulomatous inflammatory disorder characterized by defective macrophage phagolysosomal activity and accumulation of Michaelis–Gutmann bodies on histopathology. It occurs predominantly in immunocompromised individuals and may mimic infectious, inflammatory, or neoplastic processes, creating significant diagnostic challenges. We describe four [...] Read more.
Background: Malakoplakia is a rare chronic granulomatous inflammatory disorder characterized by defective macrophage phagolysosomal activity and accumulation of Michaelis–Gutmann bodies on histopathology. It occurs predominantly in immunocompromised individuals and may mimic infectious, inflammatory, or neoplastic processes, creating significant diagnostic challenges. We describe four cases of malakoplakia occurring in distinct immunocompromised states and review the published literature to better characterize its clinical spectrum, management, and outcomes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective case series of four patients diagnosed with histologically confirmed malakoplakia at our institution. Cases occurred in the setting of liver transplantation, kidney transplantation, relapsed acute myeloid leukemia, and ulcerative colitis treated with immunosuppressive therapy. A literature review was performed using PubMed and Google Scholar to identify published cases of malakoplakia in immunocompromised hosts. Demographic, clinical, microbiological, therapeutic, and outcome data were extracted and analyzed descriptively. Results: Four patients with malakoplakia involving the gastrointestinal tract or renal allograft were identified. Clinical presentations ranged from incidental endoscopic findings and tumor-like colonic masses to recurrent bacteremia and graft dysfunction. Histopathologic examination demonstrated characteristic Michaelis–Gutmann bodies in all cases. Management included antimicrobial therapy, observation, and surgical intervention when necessary. Two patients achieved complete clinical and histologic resolution, one required transplant nephrectomy because of persistent allograft infection, and one died from progressive acute myeloid leukemia. Combined with 48 cases identified in the literature, 52 patients were analyzed. The gastrointestinal tract was the most frequently affected site (76.9%), followed by the genitourinary tract (19.2%). Malignancy (32.7%), solid-organ transplantation (26.9%), and autoimmune disease (21.2%) were the most common underlying conditions. Conclusions: Malakoplakia should be considered in the differential diagnosis of mass lesions, persistent infections, and inflammatory lesions in immunocompromised patients, particularly those with malignancy or receiving immunosuppressive therapy. Early histopathologic diagnosis is essential to distinguish malakoplakia from malignancy and guide appropriate management. Our findings highlight the heterogeneous clinical manifestations and outcomes of this uncommon condition and emphasize the importance of multidisciplinary evaluation in affected patients. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 1035 KB  
Article
Clinical Validity of Imatinib Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in a Real-World Italian Cohort of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors and the Role of Patients’ Sex
by Sara Gagno, Angela Buonadonna, Eleonora Cecchin, Arianna Fumagalli, Bianca Posocco, Giovanni Canil, Riccardo Cecchin, Michela Guardascione, Marcella Montico, Fabio Puglisi and Erika Cecchin
Pharmaceutics 2026, 18(8), 968; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics18080968 - 7 Aug 2026
Viewed by 284
Abstract
Background: Substantial inter-individual variability in imatinib systemic exposure may influence both efficacy and toxicity. Based on recommendations of the International Association for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology (IATDMCT), the IRCCS-CRO of Aviano started in 2018 offering physicians the opportunity to monitor [...] Read more.
Background: Substantial inter-individual variability in imatinib systemic exposure may influence both efficacy and toxicity. Based on recommendations of the International Association for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology (IATDMCT), the IRCCS-CRO of Aviano started in 2018 offering physicians the opportunity to monitor plasma concentrations of imatinib and its active metabolite, norimatinib, as part of a diagnostic service for patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST). This study aims to evaluate the potential clinical utility of imatinib Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM) in predicting response and toxicity in a real-world cohort of 63 patients with GIST. Methods: Imatinib and its active metabolite norimatinib trough concentrations (Cmin) were quantified using a validated LC–MS/MS method. Associations between drug exposure and clinical–demographic characteristics, treatment-related toxicity, and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated. Results: A total of 437 plasma samples from 63 patients were collected. Marked inter- and intra-patient variability in imatinib exposure was observed (43% and 31% respectively); 67% of patients receiving 400 mg/day had a Cmin below the recommended target concentration (1100 ng/mL). Female sex was significantly associated with higher imatinib exposure (median Cmin 1114 vs. 786 ng/mL in males; p = 0.0018). Combined age–sex analysis showed a significant difference between women and men < 60 years (1041 vs. 668 ng/mL; p = 0.0068, Bonferroni-adjusted). A strong exposure–toxicity relationship emerged, with higher imatinib levels in samples collected at toxicity occurrence vs. the others (1728 vs. 927 ng/mL; p < 0.0001), without a direct association between sex and toxicity. No significant association between Cmin and PFS was observed; however, disease progression was more frequent in patients with Cmin < 500 ng/mL and absent in those with Cmin >1500 ng/mL (60% vs. 0%, respectively). Conclusions: TDM was found to be a potentially useful tool for predicting clinically relevant toxicity and outcome. Sex and age significantly influence exposure, supporting tailored dosing strategies. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 3527 KB  
Article
Adult Sarcomas with NTRK Fusions: Clinicopathologic and Genomic Heterogeneity
by Michael Schwartz, Kieran Sweeney, Steven C. Smith, Kartik Angara, Celia Reynolds, Alberto S. Pappo, Andrew Elliott, Matthew J. Oberley, Mark G. Evans and Armita Bahrami
Cancers 2026, 18(15), 2528; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18152528 - 6 Aug 2026
Viewed by 355
Abstract
Background: NTRK gene fusions are established oncogenic drivers in a diverse spectrum of mesenchymal neoplasms. Although classically described in pediatric entities, NTRK-rearranged sarcomas also occur in adults, where their clinicopathologic features, genomic context, and response to TRK inhibition are less well characterized. Methods: [...] Read more.
Background: NTRK gene fusions are established oncogenic drivers in a diverse spectrum of mesenchymal neoplasms. Although classically described in pediatric entities, NTRK-rearranged sarcomas also occur in adults, where their clinicopathologic features, genomic context, and response to TRK inhibition are less well characterized. Methods: We retrospectively queried a national referral genomics database to identify sarcomas in patients >18 years harboring pathogenic NTRK1, NTRK2, or NTRK3 fusions. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors, duplicate specimens, and cases lacking digitized hematoxylin and eosin slides were excluded. Fusions were identified by whole-transcriptome sequencing, co-occurring genomic alterations by exome-based sequencing, and real-world survival and time on TRK inhibitor therapy were derived from linked insurance claims data; fusion-negative sarcomas and NTRK-rearranged non-sarcoma tumors from the same database served as comparison cohorts. Results: Among 13,040 profiled sarcomas, 19 adult tumors with pathogenic NTRK fusions were identified (median age, 43 years; range, 21–77), most of which were high grade (68%) and advanced stage (63% stage IV). Histology was heterogeneous, including spindle cell sarcoma (53%), pleomorphic sarcoma (21%), and tumors corresponding to defined entities such as NF1-associated malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor and MDM2-amplified dedifferentiated liposarcoma (11% each). NTRK1 and NTRK3 fusions were equally frequent (9 cases each); fusion partners were diverse, with TPM3 (n = 5), EML4 (n = 2), and TFG (n = 2) recurrent and other partners non-recurrent. Additional genomic alterations were common and heterogeneous (72%), including high genome-wide loss of heterozygosity and infrequent but recurrent alterations involving the TERT promoter, NF1, and RB1. All evaluable tumors showed transcriptional activation of the NTRK fusion and increased MAPK pathway activity compared with fusion-negative sarcomas. Nine patients received TRK inhibitors; median time on larotrectinib was 12.5 months, similar to that observed in NTRK-rearranged non-sarcoma tumors, but treatment duration was variable. Conclusions: Adult sarcomas harboring NTRK fusions are rare, morphologically heterogeneous, and biologically diverse. NTRK fusion status alone may not fully capture oncogenic dependence and should be interpreted within the broader clinicopathologic and genomic context. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 480 KB  
Review
Multiple Modes of Action of Anti-TNF-α Antibodies for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Beyond TNF-α Neutralization
by Tomohiro Watanabe and Masatoshi Kudo
Antibodies 2026, 15(4), 71; https://doi.org/10.3390/antib15040071 - 6 Aug 2026
Viewed by 379
Abstract
Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs), chronic inflammatory disorders of the gastrointestinal tract, are classified into Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). Despite differing clinical manifestations, both CD and UC share a common immunopathogenesis, involving excessive production of proinflammatory cytokines by macrophages and dendritic [...] Read more.
Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs), chronic inflammatory disorders of the gastrointestinal tract, are classified into Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). Despite differing clinical manifestations, both CD and UC share a common immunopathogenesis, involving excessive production of proinflammatory cytokines by macrophages and dendritic cells. Tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-12 (IL-12), and IL-23 are prototypical proinflammatory cytokines associated with CD and UC development, and biologics targeting these cytokines are widely used for treating patients with IBD. Antibodies (Abs) against IL-12 and IL-23 decrease intestinal inflammation by binding to the soluble forms of IL-12 and IL-23, respectively. Notably, anti-TNF-α Abs induce remission by neutralizing soluble TNF-α as well as membrane-bound TNF-α (mTNF-α). The binding of anti-TNF-α Abs to mTNF-α enables the diverse functions of IBD-specific TNF-α-inhibitors. Multiple modes of action of anti-TNF-α Abs for IBD include complement-dependent cytotoxicity, Ab-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, apoptosis of cells expressing mTNF-α, apoptosis of lamina propria T cells, and induction of regulatory T cells and macrophages. In this article, we introduce the diverse actions of anti-TNF-α Abs beyond TNF-α neutralization and discuss how these unique properties of anti-TNF-α Abs contribute to the efficient downregulation of IBD-associated inflammation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Antibody-Based Therapeutics)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop