Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (5)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = flavohemoglobin

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
44 pages, 4680 KB  
Review
Resistance of Nitric Oxide Dioxygenase and Cytochrome c Oxidase to Inhibition by Nitric Oxide and Other Indications of the Spintronic Control of Electron Transfer
by Paul R. Gardner
Biophysica 2025, 5(3), 41; https://doi.org/10.3390/biophysica5030041 - 9 Sep 2025
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2839
Abstract
Heme enzymes that bind and reduce O2 are susceptible to poisoning by NO. The high reactivity and affinity of NO for ferrous heme produces stable ferrous-NO complexes, which in theory should preclude O2 binding and turnover. However, NO inhibition is often [...] Read more.
Heme enzymes that bind and reduce O2 are susceptible to poisoning by NO. The high reactivity and affinity of NO for ferrous heme produces stable ferrous-NO complexes, which in theory should preclude O2 binding and turnover. However, NO inhibition is often competitive with respect to O2 and rapidly reversible, thus providing cellular and organismal survival advantages. This kinetic paradox has prompted a search for mechanisms for reversal and hence resistance. Here, I critically review proposed resistance mechanisms for NO dioxygenase (NOD) and cytochrome c oxidase (CcO), which substantiate reduction or oxidation of the tightly bound NO but nevertheless fail to provide kinetically viable solutions. A ferrous heme intermediate is clearly not available during rapid steady-state turnover. Reversible inhibition can be attributed to NO competing with O2 in transient low-affinity interactions with either the ferric heme in NOD or the ferric heme-cupric center in CcO. Toward resolution, I review the underlying principles and evidence for kinetic control of ferric heme reduction via an O2-triggered ferric heme spin crossover and an electronically-forced motion of the heme and structurally-linked protein side chains that elicit electron transfer and activate O2 in the flavohemoglobin-type NOD. For CcO, kinetics, structures, and density functional theory point to the existence of an analogous O2 and reduced oxygen intermediate-controlled electron-transfer gate with a linked proton pump function. A catalytic cycle and mechanism for CcO is finally at hand that links each of the four O2-reducing electrons to each of the four pumped protons in time and space. A novel proton-conducting tunnel and channel, electron path, and pump mechanism, most notably first hypothesized by Mårten Wikström in 1977 and pursued since, are laid out for further scrutiny. In both models, low-energy spin-orbit couplings or ‘spintronic’ interactions with O2 and NO or copper trigger the electronic motions within heme that activate electron transfer to O2, and the exergonic reactions of transient reactive oxygen intermediates ultimately drive all enzyme, electron, and proton motions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Investigations into Protein Structure)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 10950 KB  
Article
Role of Flavohemoglobins in the Development and Aflatoxin Biosynthesis of Aspergillus flavus
by Xiaoling Zhou, Dongyue Chen, Min Yu, Yuan Jiao and Fang Tao
J. Fungi 2024, 10(6), 437; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10060437 - 19 Jun 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2116
Abstract
Aspergillus flavus is notorious for contaminating food with its secondary metabolite—highly carcinogenic aflatoxins. In this study, we found that exogenous nitric oxide (NO) donor could influence aflatoxin production in A. flavus. Flavohemoglobins (FHbs) are vital functional units in maintaining nitric oxide (NO) [...] Read more.
Aspergillus flavus is notorious for contaminating food with its secondary metabolite—highly carcinogenic aflatoxins. In this study, we found that exogenous nitric oxide (NO) donor could influence aflatoxin production in A. flavus. Flavohemoglobins (FHbs) are vital functional units in maintaining nitric oxide (NO) homeostasis and are crucial for normal cell function. To investigate whether endogenous NO changes affect aflatoxin biosynthesis, two FHbs, FHbA and FHbB, were identified in this study. FHbA was confirmed as the main protein to maintain NO homeostasis, as its absence led to a significant increase in intracellular NO levels and heightened sensitivity to SNP stress. Dramatically, FHbA deletion retarded aflatoxin production. In addition, FHbA played important roles in mycelial growth, conidial germination, and sclerotial development, and response to oxidative stress and high-temperature stress. Although FHbB did not significantly impact the cellular NO level, it was also involved in sclerotial development, aflatoxin synthesis, and stress response. Our findings provide a new perspective for studying the regulatory mechanism of the development and secondary mechanism in A. flavus. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mycotoxins and Toxigenic Fungi 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 1485 KB  
Article
Catalytic Differences between Flavohemoglobins of Giardia intestinalis and E. coli
by Sarah Hill, Isabelle Decorso, Novin Nezamololama, Zahra Babaei and Steven Patrick Rafferty
Pathogens 2024, 13(6), 480; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13060480 - 6 Jun 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2112
Abstract
The sole known heme enzyme of the parasitic protist Giardia intestinalis is a flavohemoglobin (gFlHb) that acts as a nitric oxide dioxygenase (NOD) and protects the organism from the free radical nitric oxide. To learn more about the properties of this enzyme, we [...] Read more.
The sole known heme enzyme of the parasitic protist Giardia intestinalis is a flavohemoglobin (gFlHb) that acts as a nitric oxide dioxygenase (NOD) and protects the organism from the free radical nitric oxide. To learn more about the properties of this enzyme, we measured its nitric oxide dioxygenase, NADH oxidase, and cytochrome c reductase activities and compared these to the activities of the E. coli flavohemoglobin (Hmp). The turnover number for the NOD activity of gFlHb (23 s−1) is about two-thirds of that of Hmp (34 s−1) at pH 6.5 and 37 °C. The two enzymes differ in their sensitivity towards molecules that act as heme ligands. For both gFlHb and Hmp, inhibition with miconazole, a large imidazole ligand, is adequately described by simple competitive inhibition, with KI = 10 μM and 0.27 μM for gFlHb and Hmp, respectively. Inhibition plots with the small ligand imidazole were biphasic, which is consistent with previous experiments with carbon monoxide as a probe that show that the active site of flavohemoglobins exists in two conformations. Interestingly, the largest difference is observed with nitrite, which, like imidazole, also shows a biphasic inhibition plot; however, nitrite inhibits gFlHb at sub-millimolar concentrations while Hmp is not significantly affected. NADH oxidase activity measured under aerobic conditions in the absence of nitric oxide for Hmp was more than twice the activity of gFlHb. The addition of 1 mM hydrogen peroxide in these assays stimulated the NADH oxidase activity of gFlHb but not Hmp. Both enzymes had nearly identical cytochrome c reductase activities but the extent of the contribution of indirect reduction by flavohemoglobin-generated superoxide was much lower with gFlHb (4% SOD-inhibited) than with Hmp (17% SOD-inhibited). Although the active sites of the two enzymes share the same highly conserved residues that are important for catalysis, differences in the distal ligand binding site may account for these differences in activity and sensitivity towards NOD inhibitors. The differences observed in the NADH oxidase and cytochrome c reductase assays suggest that gFlHb may have evolved to protect the protist, which lacks both superoxide dismutase and catalase, from the damaging effects of superoxide by minimizing its production and from peroxide by actively reducing it. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pathogenesis and Treatment of Giardiasis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 4014 KB  
Article
Nitric Oxide Metabolism Affects Germination in Botrytis cinerea and Is Connected to Nitrate Assimilation
by Francisco Anta-Fernández, Daniela Santander-Gordón, Sioly Becerra, Rodrigo Santamaría, José María Díaz-Mínguez and Ernesto Pérez Benito
J. Fungi 2022, 8(7), 699; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8070699 - 1 Jul 2022
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 5577
Abstract
Nitric oxide regulates numerous physiological processes in species from all taxonomic groups. Here, its role in the early developmental stages of the fungal necrotroph Botrytis cinerea was investigated. Pharmacological analysis demonstrated that NO modulated germination, germ tube elongation and nuclear division rate. Experimental [...] Read more.
Nitric oxide regulates numerous physiological processes in species from all taxonomic groups. Here, its role in the early developmental stages of the fungal necrotroph Botrytis cinerea was investigated. Pharmacological analysis demonstrated that NO modulated germination, germ tube elongation and nuclear division rate. Experimental evidence indicates that exogenous NO exerts an immediate but transitory negative effect, slowing down germination-associated processes, and that this effect is largely dependent on the flavohemoglobin BCFHG1. The fungus exhibited a “biphasic response” to NO, being more sensitive to low and high concentrations than to intermediate levels of the NO donor. Global gene expression analysis in the wild-type and ΔBcfhg1 strains indicated a situation of strong nitrosative and oxidative stress determined by exogenous NO, which was much more intense in the mutant strain, that the cells tried to alleviate by upregulating several defense mechanisms, including the simultaneous upregulation of the genes encoding the flavohemoglobin BCFHG1, a nitronate monooxygenase (NMO) and a cyanide hydratase. Genetic evidence suggests the coordinated expression of Bcfhg1 and the NMO coding gene, both adjacent and divergently arranged, in response to NO. Nitrate assimilation genes were upregulated upon exposure to NO, and BCFHG1 appeared to be the main enzymatic system involved in the generation of the signal triggering their induction. Comparative expression analysis also showed the influence of NO on other cellular processes, such as mitochondrial respiration or primary and secondary metabolism, whose response could have been mediated by NmrA-like domain proteins. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 3058 KB  
Article
Translational Fusion to Hmp Improves Heterologous Protein Expression
by Xuanqing Wan, A. James Link and Mark P. Brynildsen
Microorganisms 2022, 10(2), 358; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10020358 - 4 Feb 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 3519
Abstract
Flavohemoglobins, which are widely distributed in prokaryotes and eukaryotes, play key roles in oxygen (O2) transport and nitric oxide (·NO) defense. Hmp is the flavohemoglobin of Escherichia coli, and here we report that the translational fusion of Hmp to the [...] Read more.
Flavohemoglobins, which are widely distributed in prokaryotes and eukaryotes, play key roles in oxygen (O2) transport and nitric oxide (·NO) defense. Hmp is the flavohemoglobin of Escherichia coli, and here we report that the translational fusion of Hmp to the N-terminus of heterologous proteins increases their expression in E. coli. The effect required the fusion of the proteins, and was independent of both the O2-binding and catalytic activity of Hmp. Increased expression was at the translational level, likely to be downstream of initiation, and we observed that as little as the first 100 amino acids of Hmp were sufficient to boost protein production. These data demonstrate the potential of Hmp as an N-terminal fusion tag to increase protein yield, and suggest that the utility of bacterial hemoglobins to biotechnology goes beyond their O2 transport and ·NO detoxification capabilities. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Microbial Hemoglobins)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop