Search Results (5)

Background: Impaired mucus drainage from the paranasal sinuses is often associated with nasal obstruction and reduced airway function in growing patients. Orthopedic maxillary protraction and expansion techniques can enhance airway dynamics, but their underlying fluid–structure mechanisms remain insufficiently understood. Objective: To validate that the Right Angle Maxillary Protraction Appliance (RAMPA), combined with a semi-rapid maxillary expansion (sRME) intraoral device gHu-1, improves mucus drainage by enhancing nasal airflow through nasal cavity expansion. Methods: The effects of RAMPA therapy were analyzed using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) for single-phase (air) and two-phase (air–mucus) flows within the nasal cavity, employing the unsteady RANS turbulence model. Finite element method (FEM) results from prior studies were synthesized to assess changes in the center and radius of maxillary rotation induced by RAMPA-assisted sRME. A male patient (aged 8 years 7 months to 11 years 7 months) treated with extraoral RAMPA and the intraoral appliance (gHu-1) underwent pre- and post-treatment cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and ear, nose, and throat (ENT) evaluation. Results: FEM analysis revealed an increased radius and elevated center of maxillary rotation, producing expansion that was more parallel to the palatal plane. CFD simulations showed that nasal cavity expansion increased airflow velocity and pressure drop, enhancing the suction effect that promotes mucus clearance from the frontal sinus. Clinically, nasal passages widened, paranasal opacities resolved, and occlusal and intermolar widths improved. Conclusions: RAMPA combined with sRME improves nasal airflow and maxillary skeletal expansion, facilitating paranasal mucus clearance and offering a promising adjunctive approach for enhancing upper airway function in growing patients. Full article

This study delves into the acoustic environment within dental clinics, particularly focusing on the impact of extraoral suction devices employed for infection control amid the COVID-19 pandemic. The research encompasses a comprehensive investigation, including a questionnaire survey of dental professionals, sound level measurements at suction device openings, acoustic imaging, and a detailed analysis of sound levels and their spectral characteristics during dental procedures. Additionally, ambient sound levels within clinical settings were monitored over two consecutive days. The findings reveal notable observations. Dental professionals expressed concerns regarding increased sound levels and associated distress caused by extraoral suction device operation. Objective measurements identified varying A-weighted sound pressure levels ranging from 86.0 dB to 96.7 dB at suction device openings, highlighting elevated sound pressure levels and a wide frequency range, especially in the vicinity of both the dentist and the patient’s facial area during dental aerosol procedures. On the other hand, for the entire clinical room, the equivalent continuous A-weighted sound pressure level during the consultation hours was not considered problematic. In light of these findings, it becomes evident that there is a pressing necessity to refine the acoustic characteristics of extraoral suction devices to foster a more accommodating acoustic environment for both patients and dental healthcare professionals within dental clinics. Full article

Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is an aerosol-generating procedure. A major challenge in the COVID-19 era is how to prevent the spread of aerosols and droplets in endoscopic units. We evaluated the effectiveness of an extraoral suction device in preventing indoor aerosol diffusion and droplet exposure for examiners. The study involved 61 patients who underwent EGD at our institution from 1 February to 31 March 2022. To determine whether aerosol spread increases before or after EGD examination with an extraoral suction device located in front of the patient’s mouth, aerosols of 0.3, 0.5, 1, 3, 5, and 10 μm were measured with a handheld particle counter. The degree of contamination of the plastic gowns on the examiners was assessed using the rapid adenosine triphosphate test. The extraoral suction device significantly reduced the diffusion of large particles (3, 5, and 10 μm) after finishing the EGD examination. However, the diffusion of small particles (0.3 and 0.5 μm) was significantly increased. This extraoral suction device was effective in reducing large particle diffusion during EGD examination but was limited for minimizing small particle diffusion or droplet exposure to the examiner. Full article

Oral health care workers (OHCW) are exposed to pathogenic microorganisms during dental aerosol-generating procedures. Technologies aimed at the reduction of aerosol, droplets and splatter are essential. This in vivo study assessed aerosol, droplet and splatter contamination in a simulated clinical scenario. The coolant of the high-speed air turbine was colored with red concentrate. The red aerosol, droplets and splatter contamination on the wrists of the OHCW and chests of the OHCW/volunteer protective gowns, were assessed and quantified in cm². The efficacy of various evacuation strategies was assessed: low-volume saliva ejector (LV) alone, high-volume evacuator (HV) plus LV and an extra-oral dental aerosol suction device (DASD) plus LV. The Kruskal–Wallis rank-sum test for multiple independent samples with a post-hoc test was used. No significant difference between the LV alone compared to the HV plus LV was demonstrated (p = 0.372059). The DASD combined with LV resulted in a 62% reduction of contamination of the OHCW. The HV plus LV reduced contamination by 53% compared to LV alone (p = 0.019945). The DASD demonstrated a 50% reduction in the contamination of the OHCWs wrists and a 30% reduction in chest contamination compared to HV plus LV. The DASD in conjunction with LV was more effective in reducing aerosol, droplets and splatter than HV plus LV. Full article

Human exposure to infectious aerosols results in the transmission of diseases such as influenza, tuberculosis, and COVID-19. Most dental procedures generate a significant number of aerosolized particles, increasing transmission risk in dental settings. Since the generation of aerosols in dentistry is unavoidable, many clinics have started using intervention strategies such as area-filtration units and extraoral evacuation equipment, especially under the relatively recent constraints of the pandemic. However, the effectiveness of these devices in dental operatories has not been studied. Therefore, the ability of dental personnel to efficiently position and operate such instruments is also limited. To address these challenges, we utilized a real-time sensor network for assessment of aerosol dynamics during dental restoration and cleaning producers with and without intervention. The strategies tested during the procedures were (i) local area High-Efficiency Particle Air (HEPA) filters and (ii) Extra-Oral Suction Device (EOSD). The study was conducted at the University of Washington School of Dentistry using a network of 13 fixed sensors positioned within the operatory and one wearable sensor worn by the dental operator. The sensor network provides time and space-resolved particulate matter (PM) data. Three-dimensional (3D) visualization informed aerosol persistence in the operatory. It was found that area filters did not improve the overall aerosol concentration in dental offices in a significant way. A decrease in PM concentration by an average of 16% was observed when EOSD equipment was used during the procedures. The combination of real-time sensors and 3D visualization can provide dental personnel and facility managers with actionable feedback to effectively assess aerosol transmission in medical settings and develop evidence-based intervention strategies. Full article