Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (165)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = esophageal resection

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
20 pages, 6269 KiB  
Article
Global Hypomethylation as Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Biomarker in Esophageal and Esophagogastric Junction Adenocarcinoma
by Elisa Boldrin, Maria Assunta Piano, Alice Volpato, Rita Alfieri, Monica Franco, Tiziana Morbin, Annalisa Masier, Stefano Realdon, Genny Mattara, Giovanna Magni, Antonio Rosato, Pierluigi Pilati, Alberto Fantin and Matteo Curtarello
Cancers 2025, 17(16), 2668; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17162668 - 15 Aug 2025
Viewed by 208
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Esophageal and esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma (EADC-EGJA), which mainly develops from Barrett’s esophagus (BE), low-grade dysplasia (LGD), and high-grade dysplasia (HGD), has a poor prognosis and several unmet clinical needs, among which is the detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) after endoscopic/surgical [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Esophageal and esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma (EADC-EGJA), which mainly develops from Barrett’s esophagus (BE), low-grade dysplasia (LGD), and high-grade dysplasia (HGD), has a poor prognosis and several unmet clinical needs, among which is the detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) after endoscopic/surgical resection. Long interspersed nuclear element-1 (LINE-1), a surrogate marker of global methylation, is considered an emerging biomarker for MRD monitoring. The aim of this study was to determine, by LINE-1 methylation analysis, at which carcinogenesis step global methylation is affected and whether this biomarker could be followed in longitudinal to monitor the disease behavior post-surgery. Methods: Cell-free DNA of 90 patients with non-dysplastic Barrett’s esophagus (NDBE), HGD/early EADC-EGJA, or locally advanced/advanced EADC-EGJA were analyzed for LINE-1 methylation, by Methylation-Sensitive Restriction Enzyme droplet digital PCR (MSRE-ddPCR). Twenty-six patients were longitudinally studied by repetitive blood sampling. Results: Global hypomethylation increased during carcinogenesis, with significant difference between locally advanced/advanced EADC-EGJA and NDBE patients (p = 0.028). Longitudinal cases confirmed the rareness of hypomethylation in NDBE cases. The majority of HGD/early EADC-EGJA and locally advanced/advanced EADC-EGJA patients showed methylation changes after resection according to clinical status. Conclusions: This study suggests that global hypomethylation occurs just prior to cancer invasiveness and that it is a promising biomarker to monitor MRD. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Circulating Tumour DNA and Liquid Biopsy in Oncology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1811 KiB  
Article
Modified Proximal Gastrectomy and D2 Lymphadenectomy Is an Oncologically Sound Operation for Locally Advanced Proximal and GEJ Adenocarcinoma
by Emily L. Siegler and Travis E. Grotz
Cancers 2025, 17(15), 2455; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17152455 - 24 Jul 2025
Viewed by 442
Abstract
Background: Proximal gastrectomy (PG) with double tract reconstruction (DTR) offers organ preservation for early gastric cancers, leading to reduced vitamin B12 deficiency, less weight loss, and improved quality of life. The JCOG1401 study confirmed excellent long-term outcomes for PG in stage I gastric [...] Read more.
Background: Proximal gastrectomy (PG) with double tract reconstruction (DTR) offers organ preservation for early gastric cancers, leading to reduced vitamin B12 deficiency, less weight loss, and improved quality of life. The JCOG1401 study confirmed excellent long-term outcomes for PG in stage I gastric cancer. However, in locally advanced proximal gastric cancer (LAPGC), preserving the gastric body and lymph node station 4d may compromise margin clearance and adequate lymphadenectomy. Methods: We propose a modified PG that removes the distal esophagus, gastroesophageal junction (GEJ), cardia, fundus, and gastric body, preserving only the antrum and performing DTR. Lymphadenectomy is also adapted, removing stations 1, 2, 3a, 4sa, 4sb, 4d, 7, 8, 9, 10 (spleen preserving), 11, and lower mediastinal nodes (stations 19, 20, and 110), while preserving stations 3b, 5, and 6. Indications for this procedure include GEJ (Siewert type II and III) and proximal gastric cancers with ≤2 cm distal esophageal involvement and ≤5 cm gastric involvement. Results: In our initial experience with 14 patients, we achieved R0 resection in all patients, adequate lymph node harvest (median 24 nodes, IQR 18–38), and no locoregional recurrences at a median follow-up of 18 months. We also found favorable postoperative weight loss, reflux, and anemia in the PG cohort. Conclusion: While larger studies and long-term data are still needed, our early results suggest that modified PG—despite sparing only the antrum—retains the key benefits of PG over total gastrectomy, including better weight maintenance and improved hemoglobin levels, while maintaining oncologic outcomes for LAPGC. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Surgical Innovations in Advanced Gastric Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 1342 KiB  
Review
Esophageal Squamous Papilloma and Papillomatosis: Current Evidence of HPV Involvement and Malignant Potential
by Miriana Mercurio, Roberto de Sire, Paola Campagnoli, Marco Dal Fante, Linda Fazzini, Luciano Guerra, Massimo Primignani, Maria Giuseppina Tatarella, Mauro Sollai, Sandro Ardizzone and Roberta Maselli
Cancers 2025, 17(14), 2404; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17142404 - 20 Jul 2025
Viewed by 757
Abstract
Human papillomavirus (HPV) is a recognized oncogenic agent in several epithelial malignancies, though its role in esophageal squamous lesions remains unclear. Esophageal squamous papilloma and papillomatosis are rare, often benign lesions, but increasing evidence suggests possible associations with high-risk HPV genotypes and a [...] Read more.
Human papillomavirus (HPV) is a recognized oncogenic agent in several epithelial malignancies, though its role in esophageal squamous lesions remains unclear. Esophageal squamous papilloma and papillomatosis are rare, often benign lesions, but increasing evidence suggests possible associations with high-risk HPV genotypes and a non-negligible risk of dysplasia and malignant transformation. This narrative review summarizes current evidence on epidemiology, clinical features, histopathology, and diagnostic approaches, emphasizing advanced endoscopic imaging techniques that improve lesion detection and characterization. Management relies primarily on complete endoscopic resection with histological and virological evaluation. While small, non-dysplastic solitary lesions may not require routine surveillance, multifocal or high-risk HPV-positive cases warrant closer follow-up. Standardized HPV testing and long-term prospective studies are needed to better define the oncogenic potential and inform surveillance and treatment strategies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Technical Advances in Esophageal Cancer Treatment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 758 KiB  
Article
Immunohistochemical TTF-1 and Napsin a Expression in Gastrointestinal Adenocarcinomas—Low Frequency but an Important Pitfall
by Petar Noack, Claudia Grosse, Simon Eschemann, Bastian Dislich and Rupert Langer
Diagnostics 2025, 15(12), 1490; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15121490 - 11 Jun 2025
Viewed by 826
Abstract
Background/Objectives: TTF-1 and Napsin A are immunohistochemical markers that are widely used for the diagnosis of lung adenocarcinomas or thyroid carcinomas, as well as the characterization of metastases. However, several publications have reported the aberrant expression of one or both markers in [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: TTF-1 and Napsin A are immunohistochemical markers that are widely used for the diagnosis of lung adenocarcinomas or thyroid carcinomas, as well as the characterization of metastases. However, several publications have reported the aberrant expression of one or both markers in extrathoracic malignancies, including gastrointestinal adenocarcinomas. The goal of our study was to determine the frequency of TTF-1- and Napsin A-positive neoplasms in cohorts consisting of esophageal, gastric and colorectal adenocarcinomas. Methods: Buffered formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor tissues from 854 patients with primary resected gastrointestinal and esophageal carcinomas were placed in tissue microarrays (TMAs) for investigation. Between two and six tumor cores were analyzed for each case. For immunohistochemical staining, we used TTF-1 (SPT24 clone) and Napsin A (IP64 clone). Tumors were considered positive if at least 5% of their tumor cells showed weak nuclear (TTF-1) or cytoplasmic (Napsin A) staining. Results: In total, 16 cases showed positive staining for TTF-1, alongside 7 cases for Napsin A. The greatest proportion of TTF-1- and/or Napsin A-positive tumors was found among esophageal adenocarcinomas (5/125 cases; 4%). Co-expression of TTF-1 and Napsin A was found in five cases, including three esophageal and two gastric adenocarcinomas. In colorectal carcinomas, co-expression of these markers was not detected. Conclusions: TTF-1 and Napsin A are useful immunohistochemical makers for establishing the diagnosis of pulmonary adenocarcinoma. Additionally, knowing that a proportion of gastrointestinal neoplasms express these markers can help to avoid diagnostic misinterpretations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Histopathology in Cancer Diagnosis and Prognosis—2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 1672 KiB  
Review
Current Status and Future Applications of Robotic Surgery in Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery: A Narrative Review
by Koichi Okamoto, Takashi Miyata, Taigo Nagayama, Yuta Sannomiya, Akifumi Hashimoto, Hisashi Nishiki, Daisuke Kaida, Hideto Fujita, Shinichi Kinami and Hiroyuki Takamura
Cancers 2025, 17(12), 1933; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17121933 - 10 Jun 2025
Viewed by 1340
Abstract
Robot-assisted surgery has proven highly effective in the curative treatment of various gastrointestinal cancers. The advantages of robot-assisted surgery, including precision, enhanced operability, and magnified 3D visualization, allow surgeons to perform delicate procedures that would be challenging with conventional laparotomy or laparoscopy. These [...] Read more.
Robot-assisted surgery has proven highly effective in the curative treatment of various gastrointestinal cancers. The advantages of robot-assisted surgery, including precision, enhanced operability, and magnified 3D visualization, allow surgeons to perform delicate procedures that would be challenging with conventional laparotomy or laparoscopy. These benefits make robot-assisted surgery a viable modality for treating various malignant tumors and an essential tool in curative surgery for solid cancers. Laparoscopic gastrectomy is currently the standard treatment for early gastric cancer, with numerous clinical trials assessing the efficacy of robot-assisted surgery. Although thoracoscopic esophagectomy has demonstrated advantages over open surgery in radical esophageal cancer treatment, ongoing studies are evaluating the noninferiority and potential benefits of robotic surgery. Robot-assisted surgery is also being explored for conversion surgery in cases where radical resection becomes feasible after multidisciplinary treatment and in polysurgery cases involving multiple prior laparotomies. However, establishing robust evidence for its efficacy in radical surgery for conversion and polysurgery cases remains a challenge. This narrative review discusses the advantages and limitations of robot-assisted surgery in such complex cases based on an analysis of the literature. Additionally, it examines the prospects of robotic-assisted surgery in polysurgery, metachronous remnant gastric cancer, and conversion surgery. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Robotic Surgery for Gastrointestinal (GI) Malignancies)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 328 KiB  
Article
Addressing Anastomotic Leak After Esophagectomy: Insights from a Specialized Unit
by Alexandra Triantafyllou, Evgenia Mela, Charalampos Theodoropoulos, Andreas Panagiotis Theodorou, Eleni Kitsou, Konstantinos Saliaris, Sofia Katsila, Konstantinos Kakounis, Tania Triantafyllou and Dimitrios Theodorou
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(11), 3694; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14113694 - 25 May 2025
Viewed by 1151
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Anastomotic leakage is one of the most frightening and potentially fatal complications after esophagectomy. The collaboration between the surgical team, interventional gastroenterologists, and radiologists has the potential to improve the hospital stay, as well as morbidity and mortality. The aim of this [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Anastomotic leakage is one of the most frightening and potentially fatal complications after esophagectomy. The collaboration between the surgical team, interventional gastroenterologists, and radiologists has the potential to improve the hospital stay, as well as morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study is to present our experience and evaluate the results of the multimodal management of anastomotic leak following esophagectomy in our unit. Methods: This is a retrospective study analyzing a single referral center’s prospectively maintained database of all patients diagnosed with anastomotic leak between March 2019 and March 2025 using the definition of the Esophageal Complications Consensus Group. The treatment pathways and the patient outcomes are presented. The primary endpoint was 90-day mortality and in-hospital mortality. Results: A total of 241 esophageal resections were performed between March 2019 and March 2025. Lymphadenectomy of the mediastinum was performed in 88.4% of the patients. Cervical and intrathoracic anastomosis were performed in 143 (59.3%) and 98 (40.7%) cases, respectively. Twenty-nine patients (12%) with a mean age of 59.1 years developed anastomotic leak. Anastomotic leak occurred in 14.3% of intrathoracic anastomoses and 10.5% of cervical anastomoses. The median day of leak diagnosis was the sixth postoperative day. Leak management involved conservative strategies, wound exploration, endoscopic stent placement or vacuum therapy, drainage of effusions under radiologic guidance, and reoperation. The 90-day and in-hospital mortality rate was 3.4%. No cases of conduit necrosis or mediastinitis were reported. Endoscopic management was employed in 18 patients (62.1%) as a first- or second-line treatment, while reoperation was required in 6 patients (20.7%). The median interval from diagnosis to anastomosis healing was 21 days and the median duration of hospital stay 32 days. The management was successful in 27 patients (93.1%) except for 1 who developed tracheoesophageal fistula and 1 who died due to hemorrhagic complication of anticoagulant treatment. Conclusions: Anastomotic leak after esophagectomy is considered a complex, diversified, and morbid clinical entity. The evolving potential of multidisciplinary management encompassing surgical and interventional radiological and endoscopic treatment addresses the mortality rates and heralds a new era of minimizing morbidity. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 197 KiB  
Article
Post-Esophagectomy Dumping Syndrome: Assessing Quality of Life of Long-Term Survivors
by Dionysios Dellaportas, Ioannis Margaris, Eleftherios Tsalavoutas, Zoi Gkiafi, Anastasia Pikouli, Despoina Myoteri, Nikolaos Pararas, Panagis M Lykoudis, Constantinos Nastos and Emmanuel Pikoulis
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(10), 3587; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14103587 - 21 May 2025
Viewed by 778
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Survival rates for esophageal cancer patients have markedly improved. Inevitably, attention has been drawn to functional and quality-of-life problems. The aim of the current study was to investigate the prevalence of dumping syndrome in patients following esophageal resection and its correlation with [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Survival rates for esophageal cancer patients have markedly improved. Inevitably, attention has been drawn to functional and quality-of-life problems. The aim of the current study was to investigate the prevalence of dumping syndrome in patients following esophageal resection and its correlation with postoperative quality of life. Methods: This cross-sectional study involved disease-free patients who underwent a potentially curative resection for esophageal or gastroesophageal junction carcinoma between January 2019 and January 2024 in a single academic institution. Patients were asked to fill in two questionnaires: the Dumping Syndrome Rating Scale (DSRS) and the QLQ-OG25. A Composite Dumping Syndrome Index (CDSI) was calculated by adding the summary severity and frequency scores for each patient. Results: During the study period, 42 patients underwent esophagectomy for malignant esophageal or junctional tumors. In total, 14 eligible patients responded to the questionnaires at a mean time of 19.7 (±20.8) months following their operation. Three patients (21%) reported having at least quite severe problems related to at least two dumping symptoms. Six patients (43%) reported that they avoid certain foods in order to alleviate related problems. A high CDSI score was associated with significantly increased OG25 scores for dysphagia, eating restriction, odynophagia, pain and discomfort, and reflux (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Early dumping syndrome can occur in a significant proportion of patients following esophagectomy and may adversely affect quality of life. Full article
15 pages, 3033 KiB  
Article
Tips and Tricks in the Laparoscopic Treatment of Type I Duodenal Atresia: Description of a Technique
by Salvatore Fabio Chiarenza, Maria Luisa Conighi, Valeria Bucci and Cosimo Bleve
Children 2025, 12(4), 517; https://doi.org/10.3390/children12040517 - 17 Apr 2025
Viewed by 857
Abstract
Introduction: Congenital duodenal atresia (DA) (Type I) with a fenestrated web can be characterized by a late presentation with a delayed diagnosis. It is even rarer and usually associated with proximal duodenomegaly. Conventional management involves web resection and duodeno–duodeno anastomosis with or without [...] Read more.
Introduction: Congenital duodenal atresia (DA) (Type I) with a fenestrated web can be characterized by a late presentation with a delayed diagnosis. It is even rarer and usually associated with proximal duodenomegaly. Conventional management involves web resection and duodeno–duodeno anastomosis with or without duodenoplasty. We describe our mininvasive surgical strategy and management, detailing the aspects of laparoscopic techniques. Material and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of five patients affected by fenestrated duodenal web (DA) with a delayed onset of symptoms and diagnosis who were managed in our Department over a period of 10 years (2013–2023). We analyzed the age of patients at diagnosis, clinical signs and symptoms, associated congenital anomalies, radiological and intraoperative findings, surgical treatment, and outcomes. Diagnostic examinations included ultrasound (US), Upper-Gastrointestinal Study (UGI), and Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGDS). Results: Three boys and two girls, median age of 5.5 months (range 3–11 months), were included in this study. Three underwent previous surgery for long-gap esophageal atresia (EA), two of Type A, and one of Type C, requiring a gastrostomy immediately after birth (delayed esophageal repair for prematurity in Type C) and subsequent delayed primary anastomosis. Major associated anomalies were EA (3), anterior ectopic anus (1), cloaca (1), and Type IV laryngeal web (1). An antenatal diagnostic suspicion of duodenal atresia (obstruction) on ultrasound was described in two patients. UGI suggested a fenestrated duodenal web, visualized at ultrasound in two patients. Duodenal dilation was associated in two cases. The symptoms were feeding difficulties, nonbilious vomiting, upper abdominal distension, and poor growth. All presented with a pre-ampullary obstruction. Endoscopic confirmation was only possible in one patient. The older patient underwent an endoscopic resection of a duodenal web. In the other four, we performed a laparoscopic longitudinal antimesenteric duodenal incision, web resection (excision), and transverse suture (closure was performed) without duodenoplasty. Intraduodenal Indocyanine Green (ICG) visualization (under near-infrared light) was used in the last two cases. No postoperative complications were recorded, with a mean hospital stay of 8 days. A contrast study performed at 4 weeks demonstrated an improved proximal duodenal profile; patients tolerated a full diet and remained symptom-free. Conclusions: According to our experience with minimally invasive techniques, laparoscopy and endoscopy are effective and safe, supporting web resection for the management of a duodenal web without tapering of the proximal duodenum. They require advanced technical skills. Intraduodenal-ICG injection during laparoscopic treatment of Type 1 DA allows localization of the duodenal web, confirmation of bowel patency (bowel canalization) and the tightness of suture. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Stabilization and Resuscitation of Newborns: 3rd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 260 KiB  
Review
Evolution of Therapeutics for Locally Advanced Upper Gastrointestinal Adenocarcinoma
by Jenny J. Li, Jane E. Rogers, Rebecca E. Waters, Qiong Gan, Mariela Blum Murphy and Jaffer A. Ajani
Cancers 2025, 17(8), 1307; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17081307 - 12 Apr 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 824
Abstract
Upper gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies, including esophageal, gastroesophageal junction (GEJ), and gastric adenocarcinomas, remain a major global health concern, with poor overall survival and high recurrence rate despite aggressive treatment. Patients with very early tumors (cT1a) can benefit from endoscopic therapy. However, patients with [...] Read more.
Upper gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies, including esophageal, gastroesophageal junction (GEJ), and gastric adenocarcinomas, remain a major global health concern, with poor overall survival and high recurrence rate despite aggressive treatment. Patients with very early tumors (cT1a) can benefit from endoscopic therapy. However, patients with locally advanced disease require multimodal therapies that may combine surgery, radiation, and systemic therapies. This review provides a comprehensive overview of recent advancements in the treatment of locally advanced upper GI adenocarcinomas. Surgical resection remains the cornerstone of curative treatment, with perioperative chemotherapy emerging as the standard of care. While preoperative chemoradiation has demonstrated some benefits in esophageal and GEJ cancers, recent data suggest a more limited role for radiation going forward. Immunotherapy has shown some promise in both the adjuvant and perioperative settings but has yet to establish definitive survival benefit. The integration of HER2-targeted therapies into treatment regimens for HER2-positive locally advanced gastroesophageal cancers has not yielded significant improvements, underscoring the need for more effective strategies. Ongoing research focuses on better predictive biomarkers, personalized treatment approaches, and potential organ preservation strategies for patients achieving a clinical complete response. Continued advancements in treatment modalities and precision medicine are critical to improving survival for patients with locally advanced upper GI adenocarcinomas. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Developments in the Management of Gastrointestinal Malignancies)
17 pages, 14392 KiB  
Review
Non-Curative Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: Current Concepts, Pitfalls and Future Perspectives
by João Santos-Antunes
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(7), 2488; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14072488 - 5 Apr 2025
Viewed by 586
Abstract
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is very effective for the treatment of digestive tract neoplasia. However, it is very demanding, with a long learning curve, and, therefore, a significant rate of non-curative resections is expected, considering lesion characteristics, location, and endoscopist experience. The management [...] Read more.
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is very effective for the treatment of digestive tract neoplasia. However, it is very demanding, with a long learning curve, and, therefore, a significant rate of non-curative resections is expected, considering lesion characteristics, location, and endoscopist experience. The management of patients after a non-curative ESD is not definitely established. It must consider patients’ comorbidities and expected survival, as well as the morbidity and mortality of complementary treatments such as surgery, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy. On the other hand, there is a window of opportunity to offer those additional treatments to complete neoplastic treatment and give patients an oncological cure. This decision is sometimes difficult, since the diverse histological criteria that define a non-curative ESD do not have the same weight regarding residual risk and oncological progression. The prediction of residual lesion would be paramount to decide whether to refer patients to surgery; nowadays, this prediction is far from perfect, since most of the patients that undergo surgery due to a non-curative ESD do not have residual neoplasia in the surgical specimen. In this review, ESD curativeness and the management of non-curative ESDs performed for esophageal, gastric, and colorectal lesions will be addressed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Gastroenterology & Hepatopancreatobiliary Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 1930 KiB  
Review
Gastroesophageal Neuroendocrine Tumors: Outcomes and Management
by Christine Son, Joshua Kalapala, Jeff Leya, Michelle Marion Popadiuk, Mohammed K. Atieh, Daniel Havlichek, Lawrence Feldman, Paul Roach and Promila Banerjee
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(7), 2148; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14072148 - 21 Mar 2025
Viewed by 1312
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) can arise in any organ and are most commonly found in the lungs and gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) system. GEP-NETs represent a small percentage of gastrointestinal cancers, and therefore, the standard treatment is not well-defined, especially for advanced disease. Our [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) can arise in any organ and are most commonly found in the lungs and gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) system. GEP-NETs represent a small percentage of gastrointestinal cancers, and therefore, the standard treatment is not well-defined, especially for advanced disease. Our objective is to review GI NETs among veterans and analyze their therapeutic outcomes. Methods: A total of 61 GI NET cases were identified from our institution from 2019–2024. In total, twenty-seven review papers, ten population-based/multicenter/outcome studies, six case reports, and one case series were reviewed for the literature review. Results: The incidence of GI NETs at our institution was higher than the known epidemiology of GI NETs. Small intestine NETs were one of the most common sites of GEP-NETs at our institution, with only one of nineteen cases being grade 3 poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma. All cases of colonic and rectal NETs had good clinical outcomes consistent with findings from the literature. Most of the gastric NETs were type 1 and had benign courses of disease, except for one case with an intermediate grade and metastatic liver lesions. One case of esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma (E-NEC) showed a complete response to chemotherapy despite a significant tumor burden on presentation and high-grade pathology, while another case of ENEC had recurrent disease despite systemic therapy. Conclusions: While the role of surgery or endoscopic resection is limited to localized tumors, combined treatment with chemoradiation can significantly improve patient outcomes, especially in high-grade, poorly differentiated tumors. Further studies are needed to establish systemic (i.e., chemotherapy and radiation) treatment strategies for poorly differentiated GI NETs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Gastroesophageal Cancer: Outcomes and Therapeutic Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 2817 KiB  
Article
Clinical Outcome of Conversion Surgery for Stage IV Esophageal Cancer Following Chemoradiation
by Hu-Lin Christina Wang, Ke-Cheng Chen, Pei-Ming Huang, Chih-Hung Hsu, Chia-Hsien Cheng, Feng-Ming Hsu, Ta-Chen Huang, Jhe-Cyuan Guo and Jang-Ming Lee
Biomedicines 2025, 13(3), 745; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13030745 - 18 Mar 2025
Viewed by 862
Abstract
Purpose: We aimed to identify the impact of conversion surgery to survival in patients with stage IV esophageal cancer who have a stabilized disease and good treatment response before surgery. Patients and Methods: This retrospective study included patients with esophageal cancer M1 disease [...] Read more.
Purpose: We aimed to identify the impact of conversion surgery to survival in patients with stage IV esophageal cancer who have a stabilized disease and good treatment response before surgery. Patients and Methods: This retrospective study included patients with esophageal cancer M1 disease treated at a tertiary medical center from April 2002 to June 2021. For patients with a good clinical response to chemoradiation and well-controlled metastatic lesions, esophagectomy and lymphadenectomy were performed. A propensity score-matching (PSM) study with a 1:2 ratio and based on patient age, tumor stage, and metastasis status was conducted for verifying the results. Results: We enrolled 162 patients, including 124 treated with concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) alone and 38 treated with CCRT followed by esophagectomy. A total of 114 patients were analyzed using PSM, including 76 patients treated with CCRT alone and 38 patients treated with CCRT and surgery. The 3- and 5-year OS was 24.6% vs. 2.8% and 12.3% vs. 1.4% (p = 0.006), and PSM was 24.6% vs. 4.6% and 12.3% vs. 2.3% (p = 0.033) for those with or without esophagectomy, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed surgery with esophagectomy as an independent prognostic factor for OS with odd ratios (95% confidence interval [CI]) of 1.91 (1.23–2.95) (p = 0.004). Conclusions: Surgical resection following CCRT holds a potential survival benefit for the patients with a favorable response to CCRT for patients with stage IV esophageal cancer. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cancer Biology and Oncology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 4765 KiB  
Systematic Review
Posterior Hypopharyngeal/Upper Esophageal Wall Reconstruction Using a Double-Island Free Fasciocutaneous Anterolateral Thigh Flap: A Case Report and Scoping Review of the Literature
by Léna G. Dietrich, Vera A. Paulus, Mihai A. Constantinescu, Moritz C. Deml, Roland Giger and Ioana Lese
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(5), 1779; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14051779 - 6 Mar 2025
Viewed by 858
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Isolated defects of the posterior hypopharyngeal/upper esophageal wall are rare, typically arising after cancer resection or complications following cervical spine osteosynthesis. Various local and free flaps are available for reconstruction, but we opted for a double-island anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap in [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Isolated defects of the posterior hypopharyngeal/upper esophageal wall are rare, typically arising after cancer resection or complications following cervical spine osteosynthesis. Various local and free flaps are available for reconstruction, but we opted for a double-island anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap in this case. Methods: A scoping review was conducted (June 2024) following PRISMAScR 2018 guidelines in order to examine the coverage options available in the literature for posterior hypopharyngeal/upper esophagus wall defects while also presenting a case where such a defect was covered with a double-island anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap. Eligibility criteria: Human studies describing defect coverage of the posterior hypopharyngeal/upper esophagus wall were included. Sources of evidence: A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar, following PRISMAScR guidelines. Charting methods: Data on surgical techniques, outcomes, and complications were extracted and analyzed by two independent reviewers. Case report: A 57-year-old female developed a chronic posterior wall perforation following Zenker’s diverticulum treatment and C5/6 cage osteosynthesis. Reconstruction was performed using a free fasciocutaneous ALT flap with two skin paddles: one (2 × 2 cm) for the esophageal mucosa and an additional vascularized fascia layer (4 × 8 cm) to separate the cage from the hypopharyngeal defect. To enable flap monitoring in the otherwise hidden defect, a second skin island was externalized cervically. Results: Postoperative recovery was uneventful, with a continuous viable flap signal. A Gastrografin swallow test confirmed an intact esophagus without leaks or dehiscences. Oral intake resumed after 10 days. The literature review highlighted 239 cases with multiple reconstructive techniques, each with advantages and limitations. Conclusions: The double-paddle free fasciocutaneous ALT flap is a viable option for posterior hypopharyngeal/upper esophageal wall reconstruction, allowing effective postoperative monitoring. This approach offers a valuable modification for complex cases requiring enhanced structural integrity and flap assessment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Gastroenterology & Hepatopancreatobiliary Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 537 KiB  
Review
Current Advances in Immunotherapy Management of Esophageal Cancer
by Sagar Pyreddy, Sarah Kim, William Miyamoto, Zohray Talib, Dev A. GnanaDev and Amir A. Rahnemai-Azar
Cancers 2025, 17(5), 851; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17050851 - 1 Mar 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2043
Abstract
Esophageal cancer is one of the most common and deadliest cancers worldwide. Rates of esophageal cancer worldwide have been steadily rising over the past decade due to higher incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Current therapies include surgical resection, chemotherapy, and limited targeted [...] Read more.
Esophageal cancer is one of the most common and deadliest cancers worldwide. Rates of esophageal cancer worldwide have been steadily rising over the past decade due to higher incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Current therapies include surgical resection, chemotherapy, and limited targeted therapies. One obstacle to care is tumor cells’ ability to evade immune surveillance, which can render certain therapeutics ineffective. Immunotherapy provides a new paradigm to cancer treatment, which has proven to be effective in evasive tumors. In recent years, PD-1/PD-L1 and CLTA-4 inhibitors have been used as frontline treatment and have shown to be extremely effective in the treatment of hard-to-treat tumors. Here, we aim to analyze the current literature regarding current therapeutics along with emerging techniques and future receptor targets for immunotherapy. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

29 pages, 10267 KiB  
Systematic Review
Esophagectomy Versus Endoscopic Resection with Adjuvant Therapy for T1b/T2 Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by Eagan J. Peters, Madeline Robinson, Noopur Patel and Biniam Kidane
Cancers 2025, 17(4), 680; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17040680 - 17 Feb 2025
Viewed by 1349
Abstract
Esophageal cancer is the seventh most common cause of cancer-related death worldwide [...] Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Oesogastric Cancer: Treatment and Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop