Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (5)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = djerfisherite

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
20 pages, 7314 KiB  
Article
Zoharite, (Ba,K)6 (Fe,Cu,Ni)25S27, and Gmalimite, K6□Fe2+24S27—New Djerfisherite Group Minerals from Gehlenite-Wollastonite Paralava, Hatrurim Complex, Israel
by Irina O. Galuskina, Biljana Krüger, Evgeny V. Galuskin, Hannes Krüger, Yevgeny Vapnik, Mikhail Murashko, Kamila Banasik and Atali A. Agakhanov
Minerals 2025, 15(6), 564; https://doi.org/10.3390/min15060564 - 26 May 2025
Viewed by 415
Abstract
Zoharite (IMA 2017-049), (Ba,K)6 (Fe,Cu,Ni)25S27, and gmalimite (IMA 2019-007), ideally K6□Fe2+24S27, are two new sulfides of the djerfisherite group. They were discovered in an unusual gehlenite–wollastonite paralava with pyrrhotite nodules located [...] Read more.
Zoharite (IMA 2017-049), (Ba,K)6 (Fe,Cu,Ni)25S27, and gmalimite (IMA 2019-007), ideally K6□Fe2+24S27, are two new sulfides of the djerfisherite group. They were discovered in an unusual gehlenite–wollastonite paralava with pyrrhotite nodules located in the Hatrurim pyrometamorphic complex, Negev Desert, Israel. Zoharite and gmalimite build grained aggregates confined to the peripheric parts of pyrrhotite nodules, where they associate with pentlandite, chalcopyrite, chalcocite, digenite, covellite, millerite, heazlewoodite, pyrite and rudashevskyite. The occurrence and associated minerals indicate that zoharite and gmalimite were formed at temperatures below 800 °C, when sulfides formed on external zones of the nodules have been reacting with residual silicate melt (paralava) locally enriched in Ba and K. Macroscopically, both minerals are bronze in color and have a dark-gray streak and metallic luster. They are brittle and have a conchoidal fracture. In reflected light, both minerals are optically isotropic and exhibit gray color with an olive tinge. The reflectance values for zoharite and gmalimite, respectively, at the standard COM wavelengths are: 22.2% and 21.5% at 470 nm, 25.1% and 24.6% at 546 nm, 26.3% and 25.9% at 589 nm, as well as 27.7% and 26.3% at 650 nm. The average hardness for zoharite and for gmalimite is approximately 3.5 of the Mohs hardness. Both minerals are isostructural with owensite, (Ba,Pb)6(Cu,Fe,Ni)25S27. They crystallize in cubic space group Pm3¯m with the unit-cell parameters a = 10.3137(1) Å for zoharite and a = 10.3486(1) Å for gmalimite. The calculated densities are 4.49 g·cm−3 for the zoharite and 3.79 g·cm−3 for the gmalimite. The primary structural units of these minerals are M8S14 clusters, composed of MS4 tetrahedra surrounding a central MS6 octahedron. The M site is occupied by transition metals such as Fe, Cu, and Ni. These clusters are further connected via the edges of the MS4 tetrahedra, forming a close-packed cubic framework. The channels within this framework are filled by anion-centered polyhedra: SBa9 in zoharite and SK9 in gmalimite, respectively. In the M8S14 clusters, the M atoms are positioned so closely that their d orbitals can overlap, allowing the formation of metal–metal bonds. As a result, the transition metals in these clusters often adopt electron configurations that reflect additional electron density from their local bonding environment, similar to what is observed in pentlandite. Due to the presence of shared electrons in these metal–metal bonds, assigning fixed oxidation states—such as Fe2+/Fe3+ or Cu+/Cu2+—becomes challenging. Moreover, modeling the distribution of mixed-valence cations (Fe2+/3+, Cu+/2+, and Ni2+) across the two distinct M sites—one located in the MS6 octahedron and the other in the MS4 tetrahedra—often results in ambiguous outcomes. Consequently, it is difficult to define an idealized end-member formula for these minerals. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection New Minerals)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

43 pages, 14752 KiB  
Article
Sulfide Minerals as Potential Tracers of Isochemical Processes in Contact Metamorphism: Case Study of the Kochumdek Aureole, East Siberia
by Ella V. Sokol, Anna S. Deviatiiarova, Svetlana N. Kokh, Vadim N. Reutsky, Adam Abersteiner, Kseniya A. Philippova and Dmitry A. Artemyev
Minerals 2021, 11(1), 17; https://doi.org/10.3390/min11010017 - 25 Dec 2020
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 4507
Abstract
Marly limestones from the Lower Silurian sedimentary units of the Tunguska basin (East Siberia, Russia) underwent metamorphism along the contact with the Early Triassic Kochumdek trap intrusion. At ≤ 2.5 m from the contact, the limestones were converted into ultrahigh-temperature marbles composed of [...] Read more.
Marly limestones from the Lower Silurian sedimentary units of the Tunguska basin (East Siberia, Russia) underwent metamorphism along the contact with the Early Triassic Kochumdek trap intrusion. At ≤ 2.5 m from the contact, the limestones were converted into ultrahigh-temperature marbles composed of pure calcite and sulfide-bearing calcsilicate layers. The sulfide assemblages in the gabbro and marbles were studied as potential tracers of spurrite-merwinite facies alteration. The gabbro-hosted sulfides show Fe-Ni-Cu-Co speciation (pyrrhotite and lesser amounts of chalcopyrite, pentlandite, and cobaltite) and positive δ34S values (+2.7 to +13.1‰). Both matrix and inclusion sulfide assemblages of prograde melilite, spurrite, and merwinite marbles consist dominantly of pyrrhotite and minor amounts of troilite, sphalerite, wurtzite, alabandite, acanthite, and galena. In contrast to its magmatic counterpart, metamorphic pyrrhotite is depleted in Cu (3–2000 times), Ni (7–800 times), Se (20–40 times), Co (12 times), and is isotopically light (about –25‰ δ34S). Broad solid solution series of (Zn,Fe,Mn)Scub, (Zn,Mn,Fe)Shex, and (Mn,Fe)Scub indicate that the temperature of contact metamorphism exceeded 850–900 °C. No metasomatism or S isotope resetting signatures were detected in the prograde mineral assemblages, but small-scale penetration of magma-derived K- and Cl-rich fluids through more permeable calcsilicate layers was documented based on the distribution of crack-filling Fe-K sulfides (rasvumite, djerfisherite, and bartonite). Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 3928 KiB  
Article
Magma Mingling in Kimberlites: Evidence from the Groundmass Cocrystallization of Two Spinel-Group Minerals
by Jingyao Xu, Joan Carles Melgarejo, Qiuli Li, Lisard Torró i Abat and Montgarri Castillo-Oliver
Minerals 2020, 10(9), 829; https://doi.org/10.3390/min10090829 - 20 Sep 2020
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 3388
Abstract
We present the results of a detailed petrographic study of fresh coherent samples of the Menominee kimberlite sampled at site 73, located in Menominee County, MI, USA. Our objective is to account for its unusual and complex paragenetic sequence. Several generations of olivine, [...] Read more.
We present the results of a detailed petrographic study of fresh coherent samples of the Menominee kimberlite sampled at site 73, located in Menominee County, MI, USA. Our objective is to account for its unusual and complex paragenetic sequence. Several generations of olivine, ilmenite, and spinel-group minerals are described. Early olivine and ilmenite are xenocrystic and were replaced or overgrown by primary minerals. Zoned microcrysts of olivine have a xenocrystic core mantled by a first rim in which rutile, geikielite, and spinel s.s. (spinel sensu stricto) cocrystallized. The in situ U–Pb dating of a microcryst of primary rutile yielded 168.9 ± 4.4 Ma, which was interpreted as the age of emplacement. The groundmass consists of olivine, spinel s.s., a magnesian ulvöspinel–ulvöspinel–magnetite (MUM) spinel, calcite, and dolomite. An extremely low activity of Si is suggested by the crystallization of spinel s.s. instead of phlogopite in the groundmass. The presence of djerfisherite microcrysts indicates high activities of Cl and S during the late stages of melt crystallization. The occurrence of two distinct spinel-group minerals (spinel s.s. and qandilite-rich MUM) in the groundmass is interpreted as clear evidence of the mingling of a magnesiocarbonatitic melt with a dominant kimberlitic melt. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Spinel Group Minerals, Volume II)
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 13190 KiB  
Article
Metasomatic Evolution of Coesite-Bearing Diamondiferous Eclogite from the Udachnaya Kimberlite
by Denis Mikhailenko, Alexander Golovin, Andrey Korsakov, Sonja Aulbach, Axel Gerdes and Alexey Ragozin
Minerals 2020, 10(4), 383; https://doi.org/10.3390/min10040383 - 24 Apr 2020
Cited by 22 | Viewed by 4387
Abstract
A coesite-bearing diamondiferous eclogite from the Udachnaya kimberlite (Daldyn field, Siberian craton) has been studied to trace its complex evolution recorded in rock-forming and minor mineral constituents. The eclogite sample is composed of rock-forming omphacite (60 vol%), garnet (35 vol%) and quartz/coesite (5 [...] Read more.
A coesite-bearing diamondiferous eclogite from the Udachnaya kimberlite (Daldyn field, Siberian craton) has been studied to trace its complex evolution recorded in rock-forming and minor mineral constituents. The eclogite sample is composed of rock-forming omphacite (60 vol%), garnet (35 vol%) and quartz/coesite (5 vol%) and contains intergranular euhedral zoned olivine crystals, up to 200 µm long, coexisting with phlogopite, orthopyroxene, clinopyroxene (secondary), K-feldspar, plagioclase, spinel, sodalite and djerfisherite. Garnet grains are zoned, with a relatively homogeneous core and a more magnesian overgrowth rim. The rim zones further differ from the core in having higher Zr/Y (6 times that in the cores), ascribed to interaction with, or precipitation from, a kimberlite-related melt. Judging by pressure-temperature estimates (~1200 °C; 6.2 GPa), the xenolith originated at depths of ~180–200 km at the base of the continental lithosphere. The spatial coexistence of olivine, orthopyroxene and coesite/quartz with K-Na-Cl minerals in the xenolith indicates that eclogite reacted with a deep-seated kimberlite melt. However, Fe-rich olivine, orthopyroxene and low-pressure minerals (sodalite and djerfisherite) likely result from metasomatic reaction at shallower depths during transport of the eclogite by the erupting kimberlite melt. Our results demonstrate that a mixed eclogitic-peridotitic paragenesis, reported previously from inclusions in diamond, can form by interaction of eclogite and a kimberlite-related melt. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

33 pages, 8967 KiB  
Article
A Plethora of Epigenetic Minerals Reveals a Multistage Metasomatic Overprint of a Mantle Orthopyroxenite from the Udachnaya Kimberlite
by Dmitriy I. Rezvukhin, Taisia A. Alifirova, Alexander V. Golovin and Andrey V. Korsakov
Minerals 2020, 10(3), 264; https://doi.org/10.3390/min10030264 - 14 Mar 2020
Cited by 15 | Viewed by 4170
Abstract
More than forty mineral species of epigenetic origin have been identified in an orthopyroxenite from the Udachnaya-East kimberlite pipe, Daldyn kimberlite field, Siberian platform. Epigenetic phases occur as: (1) Mineral inclusions in the rock-forming enstatite, (2) daughter minerals within large (up to 2 [...] Read more.
More than forty mineral species of epigenetic origin have been identified in an orthopyroxenite from the Udachnaya-East kimberlite pipe, Daldyn kimberlite field, Siberian platform. Epigenetic phases occur as: (1) Mineral inclusions in the rock-forming enstatite, (2) daughter minerals within large (up to 2 mm) crystallized melt inclusions (CMI) in the rock-forming enstatite, and (3) individual grains and intergrowths in the intergranular space of the xenolith. The studied minerals include silicates (olivine, clinopyroxene, phlogopite, tetraferriphlogopite, amphibole-supergroup minerals, serpentine-group minerals, talc), oxides (several generations of ilmenite and spinel, rutile, perovskite, rare titanates of the crichtonite, magnetoplumbite and hollandite groups), carbonates (calcite, dolomite), sulfides (pentlandite, djerfisherite, pyrrhotite), sulfate (barite), phosphates (apatite and phosphate with a suggested crystal-chemical formula Na2BaMg[PO4]2), oxyhydroxide (goethite), and hydroxyhalides (kuliginite, iowaite). The examined epigenetic minerals are interpreted to have crystallized at different time spans after the formation of the host rock. The genesis of minerals is ascribed to a series of processes metasomatically superimposed onto the orthopyroxenite, i.e., deep-seated mantle metasomatism, infiltration of a kimberlite-related melt and late post-emplacement hydrothermal alterations. The reaction of orthopyroxene with the kimberlite-related melt has led to orthopyroxene dissolution and formation of the CMI, the latter being surrounded by complex reaction zones and containing zoned olivine grains with extremely high-Mg# (up to 99) cores. This report highlights the utility of minerals present in minor volume proportions in deciphering the evolution and modification of mantle fragments sampled by kimberlitic and other deep-sourced magmas. The obtained results further imply that the whole-rock geochemical analyses of mantle-derived samples should be treated with care due to possible drastic contaminations from “hiding” minor phases of epigenetic origin. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop