Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (4)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = callose synthase 2 gene

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
22 pages, 4811 KiB  
Article
Chromosome-Scale, De Novo, Phased Genome Assemblies of Three Australian Limes: Citrus australasica, C. inodora, and C. glauca
by Khushwant Singh, Matthew Huff, Jianyang Liu, Jong-Won Park, Tara Rickman, Manjunath Keremane, Robert R. Krueger, Madhurababu Kunta, Mikeal L. Roose, Chris Dardick, Margaret Staton and Chandrika Ramadugu
Plants 2024, 13(11), 1460; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13111460 - 24 May 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2724
Abstract
Huanglongbing (HLB) is a severe citrus disease worldwide. Wild Australian limes like Citrus australasica, C. inodora, and C. glauca possess beneficial HLB resistance traits. Individual trees of the three taxa were extensively used in a breeding program for over a decade [...] Read more.
Huanglongbing (HLB) is a severe citrus disease worldwide. Wild Australian limes like Citrus australasica, C. inodora, and C. glauca possess beneficial HLB resistance traits. Individual trees of the three taxa were extensively used in a breeding program for over a decade to introgress resistance traits into commercial-quality citrus germplasm. We generated high-quality, phased, de novo genome assemblies of the three Australian limes using PacBio long-read sequencing. The genome assembly sizes of the primary and alternate haplotypes were determined for C. australasica (337 Mb/335 Mb), C. inodora (304 Mb/299 Mb), and C. glauca (376 Mb/379 Mb). The nine chromosome-scale scaffolds included 86–91% of the genome sequences generated. The integrity and completeness of the assembled genomes were estimated to be at 97.2–98.8%. Gene annotation studies identified 25,461 genes in C. australasica, 27,665 in C. inodora, and 30,067 in C. glauca. Genes belonging to 118 orthogroups were specific to Australian lime genomes compared to other citrus genomes analyzed. Significantly fewer canonical resistance (R) genes were found in C. inodora and C. glauca (319 and 449, respectively) compared to C. australasica (576), C. clementina (579), and C. sinensis (651). Similar patterns were observed for other gene families associated with potential HLB resistance, including Phloem protein 2 (PP2) and Callose synthase (CalS) genes predicted in the Australian lime genomes. The genomic information on Australian limes developed in the present study will help understand the genetic basis of HLB resistance. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pathogenesis and Disease Control in Crops—2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

15 pages, 2126 KiB  
Article
Identification of Candidate QTLs and Genes for Ear Diameter by Multi-Parent Population in Maize
by Fuyan Jiang, Li Liu, Ziwei Li, Yaqi Bi, Xingfu Yin, Ruijia Guo, Jing Wang, Yudong Zhang, Ranjan Kumar Shaw and Xingming Fan
Genes 2023, 14(6), 1305; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14061305 - 20 Jun 2023
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 2578
Abstract
Ear diameter (ED) is a critical component of grain yield (GY) in maize (Zea mays L.). Studying the genetic basis of ED in maize is of great significance in enhancing maize GY. Against this backdrop, this study was framed to (1) map [...] Read more.
Ear diameter (ED) is a critical component of grain yield (GY) in maize (Zea mays L.). Studying the genetic basis of ED in maize is of great significance in enhancing maize GY. Against this backdrop, this study was framed to (1) map the ED-related quantitative trait locus (QTL) and SNPs associated with ED; and (2) identify putative functional genes that may affect ED in maize. To accomplish this, an elite maize inbred line, Ye107, which belongs to the Reid heterotic group, was used as a common parent and crossed with seven elite inbred lines from three different heterotic groups (Suwan1, Reid, and nonReid) that exhibited abundant genetic variation in ED. This led to the construction of a multi-parent population consisting of 1215 F7 recombinant inbred lines (F7RILs). A genome-wide association study (GWAS) and linkage analysis were then conducted for the multi-parent population using 264,694 high-quality SNPs generated via the genotyping-by-sequencing method. Our study identified a total of 11 SNPs that were significantly associated with ED through the GWAS, and three QTLs were revealed by the linkage analysis for ED. The major QTL on chromosome 1 was co-identified in the region by the GWAS at SNP_143985532. SNP_143985532, located upstream of the Zm00001d030559 gene, encodes a callose synthase that is expressed in various tissues, with the highest expression level in the maize ear primordium. Haplotype analysis indicated that the haplotype B (allele AA) of Zm00001d030559 was positively correlated with ED. The candidate genes and SNPs identified in this study provide crucial insights for future studies on the genetic mechanism of maize ED formation, cloning of ED-related genes, and genetic improvement of ED. These results may help develop important genetic resources for enhancing maize yield through marker-assisted breeding. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Maize Molecular Genetics and Functional Genomics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 7765 KiB  
Article
Nanobiotechnological Approaches to Enhance Potato Resistance against Potato Leafroll Virus (PLRV) Using Glycyrrhizic Acid Ammonium Salt and Salicylic Acid Nanoparticles
by Tahsin Shoala, Ahmed A. Al-Karmalawy, Mousa O. Germoush, Salha M. ALshamrani, Mohamed A. Abdein and Nabil S. Awad
Horticulturae 2021, 7(10), 402; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7100402 - 14 Oct 2021
Cited by 29 | Viewed by 4961
Abstract
The present research was aiming to study In-Silico the effect of Glycyrrhizic Acid ammonium salt (GAS) and Salicylic acid (SA) on the coat protein of potato leafroll virus (PLRV). In addition, in-vitro studying the effect of (GAS NPs) and Salicylic acid (SA NPs) [...] Read more.
The present research was aiming to study In-Silico the effect of Glycyrrhizic Acid ammonium salt (GAS) and Salicylic acid (SA) on the coat protein of potato leafroll virus (PLRV). In addition, in-vitro studying the effect of (GAS NPs) and Salicylic acid (SA NPs) nanoparticles at concentrations 0.15, 0.30, 1.25 and 2.5 mM, respectively, to control, decline or reduce the presence of PLRV in potato plants Solanum tuberosum L. selena. (GAS NPs) and (SA NPs) were applied in the MS medium at concentrations 0.15, 0.30, 1.25 and 2.5 mM, respectively. Results revealed that, enhancement or decline the PLRV according to the initiation of specific pathways. The expression level of Kinase 3 gene increased significantly due to the two used concentrations of GAS NPs. While the expression of callose gene was upregulated significantly in response to treatment of PLRV infected plant with (GAS NPs) with concentration (0.30 mM). Treatment with (SA NPs) caused upregulation significance only of callose gene at (2.5 mM) concentration. The molecular modeling results of used compounds (glycyrrhizic acid ammonium salt and salicylic acid) showed highest score of binding and the best rms define value with a very good binding mode and perfect interactions with amino acids of the three subunits (A, B and C) forming the protein coat of leaf roll virus. Glycyrrhizic acid ammonium salt and salicylic acid nanoparticles could be perfect solution to produce potato plant free virus in-vitro. Further larger studies are needed to investigate the role of the studied compounds in vivo. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 3419 KiB  
Article
Overexpression of Magnaporthe Oryzae Systemic Defense Trigger 1 (MoSDT1) Confers Improved Rice Blast Resistance in Rice
by Changmi Wang, Chunqin Li, Guihua Duan, Yunfeng Wang, Yaling Zhang and Jing Yang
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20(19), 4762; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20194762 - 25 Sep 2019
Cited by 21 | Viewed by 4089
Abstract
The effector proteins secreted by a pathogen not only promote virulence and infection of the pathogen, but also trigger plant defense response. Therefore, these proteins could be used as important genetic resources for transgenic improvement of plant disease resistance. Magnaporthe oryzae systemic defense [...] Read more.
The effector proteins secreted by a pathogen not only promote virulence and infection of the pathogen, but also trigger plant defense response. Therefore, these proteins could be used as important genetic resources for transgenic improvement of plant disease resistance. Magnaporthe oryzae systemic defense trigger 1 (MoSDT1) is an effector protein. In this study, we compared the agronomic traits and blast disease resistance between wild type (WT) and MoSDT1 overexpressing lines in rice. Under control conditions, MoSDT1 transgenic lines increased the number of tillers without affecting kernel morphology. In addition, MoSDT1 transgenic lines conferred improved blast resistance, with significant effects on the activation of callose deposition, reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation and cell death. On the one hand, overexpression of MoSDT1 could delay biotrophy–necrotrophy switch through regulating the expression of biotrophy-associated secreted protein 4 (BAS4) and Magnaporthe oryzaecell death inducing protein 1 (MoCDIP1), and activate plant defense response by regulating the expression of Bsr-d1, MYBS1, WRKY45, peroxidase (POD), heat shock protein 90 (HSP90), allenoxide synthase 2 (AOS2), phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL), pathogenesis-related protein 1a (PR1a) in rice. On the other hand, overexpression of MoSDT1 could increase the accumulation of some defense-related primary metabolites such as two aromatic amino acids (L-tyrosine and L-tryptohan), 1-aminocyclopropane carboxylic acid, which could be converted to ethylene, vanillic acid and L-saccharopine. Taken together, overexpression of MoSDT1 confers improved rice blast resistance in rice, through modulation of callose deposition, ROS accumulation, the expression of defense-related genes, and the accumulation of some primary metabolites. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop