Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (24)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = analgosedation

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
11 pages, 691 KiB  
Article
Sub-Tenon’s Block in Patients with Previous Encircling Band Surgery—A Feasibility Study
by Johannes Harte, Gesar Ugen, Joana Berger-Estilita, Andreas Ebneter and Friedrich Lersch
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(24), 7735; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13247735 - 18 Dec 2024
Viewed by 943
Abstract
Introduction: During the COVID-19 pandemic, reducing aerosol-generating procedures became fundamental, particularly in ophthalmic surgeries traditionally performed under general anesthesia (GA). Regional anesthesia, such as sub-Tenon’s block (STB), is widely used in vitreoretinal surgeries, offering a safer alternative by avoiding airway manipulation. However, the [...] Read more.
Introduction: During the COVID-19 pandemic, reducing aerosol-generating procedures became fundamental, particularly in ophthalmic surgeries traditionally performed under general anesthesia (GA). Regional anesthesia, such as sub-Tenon’s block (STB), is widely used in vitreoretinal surgeries, offering a safer alternative by avoiding airway manipulation. However, the altered orbital anatomy in patients with previous scleral explant surgery creates unique challenges to STB application. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and feasibility of STB in patients after encircling band surgery. Methods: This retrospective analysis included 46 patients with a history of scleral explant surgery, undergoing vitreoretinal procedures at the Bern University Hospital. All procedures were conducted under STB with either analgosedation or GA for additional support when required. An ophthalmic surgeon or an experienced anesthesiologist performed the STBs. Data collected included block success rate, procedural difficulty, incidence of chemosis, and patient satisfaction. The Institutional Ethics Committee approved this study, and all participants provided informed consent. Results: STB was successfully administered in 93.5% of cases, with only three unsuccessful blocks. Block placement was rated as easy in 55% of cases, moderately difficult in 28%, and difficult in 17%. Chemosis was observed in 24% of patients, with severe cases in only 4%. Patient satisfaction scores were high, with most patients expressing satisfaction with the STB procedure. Conversion to GA was required in only one case due to alcohol withdrawal-related agitation. Discussion: The high success rate and minimal complications suggest that STB is a feasible and safe alternative to GA in patients with prior scleral buckling surgery. The altered orbital anatomy presents potential challenges, including scar tissue and compartmentalization, which may lead to patchy anesthesia. However, the use of STB avoids the risks associated with GA and may be especially beneficial for elderly or frail patients. Future studies should further investigate the hemodynamic implications of STB in these cases and the potential for ultrasound-guided techniques to improve accuracy and safety. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Regional Anaesthesia and Acute Pain Management)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

15 pages, 271 KiB  
Review
Analgosedation in Pediatric Emergency Care: A Comprehensive Scoping Review
by Lorenzo Ciavola, Francesco Sogni, Benedetta Mucci, Eleonora Alfieri, Angela Tinella, Elena Mariotti Zani and Susanna Esposito
Pharmaceuticals 2024, 17(11), 1506; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17111506 - 8 Nov 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1815
Abstract
Effective management of pain and anxiety in pediatric emergency room is crucial for ensuring both the physical and emotional well-being of young patients. Analgosedation, a combination of analgesia and sedation, is commonly used to facilitate various procedures in children. However, selecting the optimal [...] Read more.
Effective management of pain and anxiety in pediatric emergency room is crucial for ensuring both the physical and emotional well-being of young patients. Analgosedation, a combination of analgesia and sedation, is commonly used to facilitate various procedures in children. However, selecting the optimal agent and administration route remains challenging due to the unique pharmacological profiles and side effects of available drugs. This scoping review aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the pharmacological agents used for procedural analgosedation in pediatric emergency settings, focusing on their efficacy, safety, administration routes, and potential side effects. A systematic review of the literature was conducted, focusing on key agents such as ketamine, midazolam, dexmedetomidine, fentanyl, and nitrous oxide. Studies were included based on their relevance to pediatric procedural sedation, particularly in emergency settings. Literature analysis showed that ketamine and fentanyl are effective for managing moderate to severe pain, with a rapid onset of action. Fentanyl is preferred for acute pain management following fractures and burns, while ketamine and midazolam are commonly used for emergency analgosedation. Dexmedetomidine, which induces sedation similar to natural sleep, is particularly effective in preventing pain and agitation during procedures and is well tolerated in children, especially those with developmental disorders. Nitrous oxide, when used in a 50% oxygen mixture, offers a valuable option for conscious sedation during mildly to moderately painful procedures, maintaining respiratory and airway reflexes. No single drug is ideal for all pediatric patients and procedures and the choice of agent should be tailored to the specific clinical scenario, considering both the sensory and affective components of pain. Future research should prioritize large-scale comparative studies, the exploration of combination therapies, and the development of non-pharmacological adjuncts to enhance the safety and efficacy of pediatric analgosedation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Pediatric Drug Formulations)
10 pages, 1225 KiB  
Article
CT-Guided Percutaneous Cryoablation of Breast Cancer: A Single-Center Experience
by Thomas J. Vogl, John Bielfeldt, Ulrich Kübler and Hamzah Adwan
Cancers 2024, 16(13), 2373; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16132373 - 28 Jun 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1870
Abstract
This study shall retrospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of liquid-nitrogen based CT-guided cryoablation (CA) as a minimal-invasive technique for the curative treatment of primary breast cancer. A total of 45 female patients with 56 tumors were treated by CT-guided CA in analgosedation [...] Read more.
This study shall retrospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of liquid-nitrogen based CT-guided cryoablation (CA) as a minimal-invasive technique for the curative treatment of primary breast cancer. A total of 45 female patients with 56 tumors were treated by CT-guided CA in analgosedation as an outpatient procedure. We used a liquid-nitrogen based system with a single cryoprobe and performed two freeze cycles with an intermediate thawing. The mean tumor diameter was 1.6 ± 0.7 cm. Follow-up was conducted via contrast-enhanced MR images of the breast. No complications were observed in all 56 ablations. Initial complete ablation was achieved in 100% of cases. Four cases of local tumor progression were reported, resulting in a rate of 8.9%, and 6 cases of intramammary distant recurrence at a rate of 13.3%. The extramammary tumor progression was observed in 7 patients at a rate of 15.6%. The mean overall survival was 4.13 years (95% CI: 3.7–4.5). The mean overall progression-free survival was 2.5 years (95% CI: 1.8–3.2) and the mean local progression-free survival was 2.9 years (95% CI: 2.3–3.6). Cryoablation is a safe and effective treatment for primary breast cancer tumors, which can be performed in analgosedation and as an outpatient procedure. However, potential for improvement exists and further evidence is necessary. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Breast Cancer: From Pathogenesis to Therapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 1896 KiB  
Article
Assessment of Esophageal Shifts during Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Using Intracardiac Ultrasound Integrated with 3-Dimensional Electroanatomical Mapping System
by Andrej Pernat, Mark Zavrtanik, Antonio Gianluca Robles, Silvio Romano, Luigi Sciarra and Bor Antolič
J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2024, 11(4), 110; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd11040110 - 31 Mar 2024
Viewed by 1620
Abstract
Purpose: Atrioesophageal fistula is one of the most feared complications of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) as it is associated with high mortality. Determining the esophagus location during RFCA might reduce the risk of esophageal injury. The present study aims [...] Read more.
Purpose: Atrioesophageal fistula is one of the most feared complications of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) as it is associated with high mortality. Determining the esophagus location during RFCA might reduce the risk of esophageal injury. The present study aims to evaluate the feasibility of using intracardiac echocardiography integrated into a 3-dimensional electroanatomical mapping system (ICE/3D EAM) for the assessment of esophageal position and shifts in response to ablation. Methods: We prospectively enrolled 20 patients that underwent RFCA of AF under conscious analgosedation. The virtual anatomy of the left atrium, the pulmonary vein (PV) ostia, and the esophagus was created with ICE/3D EAM. The esophageal positions were obtained at the beginning of the procedure and then after left and right PV isolation (PVI). Esophageal shifts were measured offline after the procedure using the tools available in the 3D EAM system. Results: Most esophagi moved away from the ablated PV ostia. After the left PVI, the median of the shifts was 2.8 mm (IQR 1.0–6.3). In 25% of patients, the esophagus shifted by >5.0 mm (max. 13.4 mm). After right PVI, the median of shifts was 2.0 mm (IQR 0.7–4.9). In 10% of patients, the esophageal shift was >5.0 mm (max. 7.8 mm). Conclusions: ICE/3D EAM enables the intraprocedural visualization of baseline esophageal position and its shifts after PVI. The shifts are variable, but they tend to be small and directed away from the ablation site. Repeated intraprocedural visualization of the esophagus may be needed to reduce the risk of esophageal injury. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 1483 KiB  
Article
In Vitro Hepatotoxicity of Routinely Used Opioids and Sedative Drugs
by Katharina Haller, Sandra Doß and Martin Sauer
Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2024, 46(4), 3022-3038; https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb46040189 - 30 Mar 2024
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2627
Abstract
A hepatocyte cell line was used to determine the hepatotoxicity of sedatives and opioids, as the hepatotoxicity of these drugs has not yet been well characterized. This might pose a threat, especially to critically ill patients, as they often receive high cumulative doses [...] Read more.
A hepatocyte cell line was used to determine the hepatotoxicity of sedatives and opioids, as the hepatotoxicity of these drugs has not yet been well characterized. This might pose a threat, especially to critically ill patients, as they often receive high cumulative doses for daily analgosedation and often already have impaired liver function due to an underlying disease or complications during treatment. A well-established biosensor based on HepG2/C3A cells was used for the determination of the hepatotoxicity of commonly used sedatives and opioids in the intensive care setting (midazolam, propofol, s-ketamin, thiopental, fentanyl, remifentanil, and sufentanil). The incubation time was 2 × 3 days with clinically relevant (Cmax) and higher concentrations (C5× and C10×) of each drug in cell culture medium or human plasma. Afterward, we measured the cell count, vitality, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), mitochondrial dehydrogenase activity, cytochrome P 450 1A2 (CYP1A2), and albumin synthesis. All tested substances reduced the viability of hepatocyte cells, but sufentanil and remifentanil showed more pronounced effects. The cell count was diminished by sufentanil in both the medium and plasma and by remifentanil only in plasma. Sufentanil and remifentanil also led to higher values of LDH in the cell culture supernatant. A reduction of mitochondrial dehydrogenase activity was seen with the use of midazolam and s-ketamine. Microalbumin synthesis was reduced in plasma after its incubation with higher concentrations of sufentanil and remifentanil. Remifentanil and s-ketamine reduced CYP1A2 activity, while propofol and thiopental increased it. Our findings suggest that none of the tested sedatives and opioids have pronounced hepatotoxicity. Sufentanil, remifentanil, and s-ketamine showed moderate hepatotoxic effects in vitro. These drugs should be given with caution to patients vulnerable to hepatotoxic drugs, e.g., patients with pre-existing liver disease or liver impairment as part of their underlying disease (e.g., hypoxic hepatitis or cholestatic liver dysfunction in sepsis). Further studies are indicated for this topic, which may use more complex cell culture models and global pharmacovigilance reports, addressing the limitation of the used cell model: HepG2/C3A cells have a lower metabolic capacity due to their low levels of CYP enzymes compared to primary hepatocytes. However, while the test model is suitable for parental substances, it is not for toxicity testing of metabolites. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 2332 KiB  
Article
Safety and Diagnostic Yield of Medical Pleuroscopy (MP) Performed under Balanced Analgosedation by a Pneumological Team Compared to Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery (VATS): A Retrospective Controlled Real-Life Study (TORAPO)
by Valentino Allocca, Luca Guidelli, Angela Galgano, Lucia Benedetti, Roberto Fabbroni, Andrea Bianco, Piero Paladini and Raffaele Scala
Diagnostics 2024, 14(6), 569; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14060569 - 7 Mar 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1565
Abstract
Introduction: Medical pleuroscopy (MP) is an invasive technique that provides access to the pleural space with a rigid or semi-rigid work instrument, allowing for visualization and the obtaining of bioptic pleural samples. Using pulmonologist-based analgosedation to perform pleuroscopy is still debated for safety [...] Read more.
Introduction: Medical pleuroscopy (MP) is an invasive technique that provides access to the pleural space with a rigid or semi-rigid work instrument, allowing for visualization and the obtaining of bioptic pleural samples. Using pulmonologist-based analgosedation to perform pleuroscopy is still debated for safety reasons. The aim of this real-life study is to demonstrate the safety and diagnostic yield of MP performed under balanced analgosedation by a pulmonologist team with expertise in the management of critically ill patients in the respiratory intensive care unit (RICU) and interventional pulmonology unit as compared to video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) performed by a thoracic surgeon team under anesthesiologist-based analgosedation. Methods: In this multicentric retrospective controlled study, the inclusion criteria were patients older than 18 years old with pleural effusion of unknown diagnosis consecutively admitted in the years 2017–2022 to the pulmonology unit and RICU of San Donato Hospital in Arezzo (Italy, Tuscany) and to the thoracic surgery unit of Santa Maria Le Scotte in Siena (Italy, Tuscany) to undergo, respectively, MP under balanced propofol-based analgosedation on spontaneous breathing with local anesthesia provided by a pulmonologist team (Group A), and VATS provided by a surgeon team under propofol-based analgosedation managed by an anesthesiologist using invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) via endotracheal intubation (ETI) (Group B). The primary endpoints were (1) a comparison between the two groups in terms of the diagnostic yield of pleural effusion, and (2) major and minor complications of pleuroscopic procedures. The secondary endpoints were (1) the length of the pleuroscopic procedure; (2) the duration of hospitalization; (3) propofol doses; and (4) the patient’s comfort after the procedure assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Results: We enrolled 91 patients in Group A and 116 patients in Group B. A conclusive diagnosis was obtained in 97.8% of Group A vs. 100% of Group B (p = 0.374). Malignant effusion was diagnosed in 59.3% of Group A and in 55.1% of Group B; p = 0.547. No intraoperative or postoperative mortality events or major complications were observed in Group A. The major complications observed in Group B were three major bleeding events (p = 0.079) and one exitus (p = 0.315) not related to the interventional procedure. No significant difference emerged between the two groups in terms of minor complications. The duration of the intervention was significantly lower in Group A (40.0 min ± 12.6 versus 51.5 ± 31.0; p = 0.001). Pain control and, therefore, patient comfort were better in Group A, with an average VAS of 0.34 ± 0.65 versus 2.58 ± 1.26, p < 0.001. The duration of hospitalization was lower in Group B (5.1 ± 2.6 vs. 15.5 ± 8.0, p < 0.001). The average overall dose of propofol administered was significantly lower in Group A (65.6 ± 35.8 mg versus 280 ± 20.0 mg; p < 0.001). Conclusions: This real-life study shows that the MP performed under propofol-based analgosedation by an independent pneumologist team is a safe and well-tolerated procedure with a diagnostic yield and complication rates similar to those obtained with VATS. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnosis, Classification, and Monitoring of Pulmonary Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1389 KiB  
Article
Awake Craniotomy in Conscious Sedation: The Role of A2 Agonists
by Antonio Izzi, Giuseppe Mincolelli, Grazia D’Onofrio, Vincenzo Marchello, Aldo Manuali, Nadia Icolaro, Lucia Mirabella, Anna Riefolo, Barbara Mazzotta, Alessio Barile, Leonardo Pio Gorgoglione and Alfredo Del Gaudio
Brain Sci. 2024, 14(2), 147; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci14020147 - 30 Jan 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2163
Abstract
Background: In Awake Craniotomy (AC), α2-agonists and remifentanil (clonidine and dexmedetomidine) are used in the preoperative phase and throughout the procedure to combine monitored anesthesia care and local anesthesia. The study aims were to specify the key role of α2-agonists administered and to [...] Read more.
Background: In Awake Craniotomy (AC), α2-agonists and remifentanil (clonidine and dexmedetomidine) are used in the preoperative phase and throughout the procedure to combine monitored anesthesia care and local anesthesia. The study aims were to specify the key role of α2-agonists administered and to evaluate complication presence/absence in anesthesiologic management. Methods: 42 patients undergoing AC in 3 different centers in the south of Italy (Foggia, San Giovanni Rotondo, and Bari) were recruited. Our protocol involves analgo-sedation by administering Dexmedetomidine and Remifentanil in continuous intravenous infusion, allowing the patient to be sedated and in comfort but contactable and spontaneously breathing. During pre-surgery, the patient is premedicated with intramuscular clonidine (2 µg/kg). In the operating setting, Dexmedetomidine in infusion and Remifentanil in Target Controlled Infusion for effect are started. At the end of the surgical procedure, the infusion of drugs was suspended. Results: There were no intraoperative side effects. The mean duration of interventions was 240 ± 62 min. The average quantity of Remifentanil and Dexmedetomidine infused during interventions were 4.2 ± 1.3 mg and 1.0 ± 0.3 mg, respectively. No significant side effects were described in the post-operative phase. A total of 86% of patients and 93% of surgeons were totally satisfied. Conclusions: Synergy between opioid drugs and α2 agonists plays a fundamental role in ensuring procedure success. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Neurosurgery and Neuroanatomy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 2449 KiB  
Article
Survey on Nutrition in Neurological Intensive Care Units (SONNIC)—A Cross-Sectional Survey among German-Speaking Neurointensivists on Medical Nutritional Therapy
by Leon Gehri, Moritz L. Schmidbauer, Timon Putz, Luka Ratkovic, Andreas Maskos, Cedric Zeisberger, Julia Zibold, Konstantinos Dimitriadis and on behalf of the IGNITE Study Group
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(2), 447; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13020447 - 13 Jan 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1888
Abstract
Medical nutritional therapy (MNT) in neurointensive care units (NICUs) is both particularly relevant and challenging due to prolonged analgosedation, immobilization, disorders of consciousness, and the high prevalence of dysphagia. Moreover, current guideline recommendations predominantly address the general intensive care unit (ICU) population, overlooking [...] Read more.
Medical nutritional therapy (MNT) in neurointensive care units (NICUs) is both particularly relevant and challenging due to prolonged analgosedation, immobilization, disorders of consciousness, and the high prevalence of dysphagia. Moreover, current guideline recommendations predominantly address the general intensive care unit (ICU) population, overlooking specific characteristics of neurological patients. We, therefore, conducted a web-based, cross-sectional survey for German-speaking neurointensivists mapping the clinical practices of MNT on NICUs to identify research gaps and common grounds for future clinical trials. A total of 25.9% (56/216) NICU representatives responded to our questionnaire. A total of 78.2% (43/55) were neurologist and 63% (34/54) held a leadership role. Overall, 80.4% (41/51) had established a standard operating procedure (SOP), largely based on the DGEM-Guideline (53.7%; 22/41), followed by the ESPEN-Guideline (14.6%; 6/41). Upon admission, 36% (18/50) conducted a risk stratification, with 83.3% primarily relying on past medical history (15/18) and clinical gestalt (15/18). Energy expenditure (EE) was measured or calculated by 75% (36/48), with 72.2% (26/36) using pragmatic weight-based equations. Indirect calorimetry was used by 19.4% (7/36). A total of 83.3% (30/36) used the patient’s serum glucose level as the primary biomarker to monitor metabolic tolerance. SOPs regarding ICU-Acquired Weakness (ICUAW) were found in 8.9% (4/45) of respondents. Overall, guideline adherence was 47%. In summary, this is, to the best of our knowledge, the first study systematically describing the currently applied concepts of MNT on NICUs. The data reveal great variations in the implementation of guideline recommendations, indicating the need for further research and tailored approaches to optimize nutritional therapy in neurointensive care settings. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Clinical Neurology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 2535 KiB  
Case Report
Perioperative Management of a Pediatric Patient with Beckwith–Wiedemann Syndrome Undergoing a Partial Glossectomy According to Egyedi/Obwegeser
by Antonio Izzi, Vincenzo Marchello, Aldo Manuali, Lazzaro Cassano, Andrea Di Francesco, Annalisa Mastromatteo, Andreaserena Recchia, Maria Pia Tonti, Grazia D’Onofrio and Alfredo Del Gaudio
Children 2023, 10(9), 1467; https://doi.org/10.3390/children10091467 - 28 Aug 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 3164
Abstract
Here, we report the perioperative management of a clinical case of a 6 year, 5 month old girl suffering from Beckwith–Wiedemann syndrome undergoing a partial glossectomy procedure in a patient with surgical indication for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS), difficulty swallowing, feeding, and [...] Read more.
Here, we report the perioperative management of a clinical case of a 6 year, 5 month old girl suffering from Beckwith–Wiedemann syndrome undergoing a partial glossectomy procedure in a patient with surgical indication for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS), difficulty swallowing, feeding, and speech. On surgery day, Clonidine (4 µg/kg) was administered. Following this, a general anesthesia induction was performed by administering Sevoflurane, Fentanyl, continuous intravenous Remifentanil, and lidocaine to the vocal cords, and a rhinotracheal intubation with a size 4.5 tube was carried out. Before starting the procedure, a block of the Lingual Nerve was performed with Levobupivacaine. Analgosedation was maintained with 3% Sevoflurane in air and oxygen (FiO2 of 40%) and Remifentanil in continuous intravenous infusion at a rate of 0.08–0.15 µg/kg/min. The surgical procedure lasted 2 h and 32 min. At the end of the surgery, the patient was under close observation during the first 72 h. In the pediatric patient with Beckwith–Wiedemann syndrome submitted to major maxillofacial surgery, the difficulty in managing the airways in the preoperative phase during intubation and in the post-operative phase during extubation should be considered. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Pediatric Neonatology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

8 pages, 543 KiB  
Protocol
Anesthetic Management for Awake Craniotomy Applied to Neurosurgery
by Grazia D’Onofrio, Antonio Izzi, Aldo Manuali, Giuliano Bisceglia, Angelo Tancredi, Vincenzo Marchello, Andreaserena Recchia, Maria Pia Tonti, Nadia Icolaro, Elena Fazzari, Vincenzo Carotenuto, Costanzo De Bonis, Luciano Savarese, Leonardo Pio Gorgoglione and Alfredo Del Gaudio
Brain Sci. 2023, 13(7), 1031; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13071031 - 5 Jul 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 4345
Abstract
Our anesthetic technique proposed for awake craniotomy is the monitored anesthesia care (MAC) technique, with the patient in sedation throughout the intervention. Our protocol involves analgo-sedation through the administration of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil in a continuous intravenous infusion, allowing the patient to be [...] Read more.
Our anesthetic technique proposed for awake craniotomy is the monitored anesthesia care (MAC) technique, with the patient in sedation throughout the intervention. Our protocol involves analgo-sedation through the administration of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil in a continuous intravenous infusion, allowing the patient to be sedated and in comfort, but contactable and spontaneously breathing. Pre-surgery, the patient is pre-medicated with intramuscular clonidine (2 µg/kg); it acts both as an anxiolytic and as an adjuvant in pain management and improves hemodynamic stability. In the operating setting, dexmedetomidine in infusion and remifentanil in target controlled infusion (TCI) for effect are started. The purpose of the association is to exploit the pharmacodynamics of dexmedetomidine which guarantees the control of respiratory drive, and the pharmacokinetics of remifentanil characterized by insensitivity to the drug. Post-operative management: at the end of the surgical procedure, the infusion of drugs was suspended. Wake-up craniotomy is associated with reduced hospital costs compared to craniotomy performed in general anesthesia, mainly due to reduced costs in the operating room and shorter hospital stays. Greater patient satisfaction and the benefits of avoiding hospital stay have led to the evolution of outpatient intracranial neurosurgery. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Neurosurgery and Neuroanatomy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 651 KiB  
Article
Bronchoscopist-Directed Continuous Flow Propofol Based Analgosedation during Flexible Interventional Bronchoscopy and EBUS
by Georg Evers, Michael Mohr, Lena Sprakel, Jule Galonska, Dennis Görlich and Arik Bernard Schulze
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(13), 4223; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12134223 - 22 Jun 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1714
Abstract
Sedation techniques in interventional flexible bronchoscopy and endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial-needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) are inconsistent and the evidence for required general anesthesia under full anesthesiologic involvement is scarce. Moreover, we faced the challenge of providing bronchoscopic care with limited personnel. Hence, we retrospectively identified [...] Read more.
Sedation techniques in interventional flexible bronchoscopy and endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial-needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) are inconsistent and the evidence for required general anesthesia under full anesthesiologic involvement is scarce. Moreover, we faced the challenge of providing bronchoscopic care with limited personnel. Hence, we retrospectively identified 513 patients that underwent flexible interventional bronchoscopy and/or EBUS-TBNA out of our institution between January 2020 and August 2022 to evaluate our deep analgosedation approach based on pethidine/meperidine bolus plus continuous flow adjusted propofol, the bronchoscopist-directed continuous flow propofol based analgosedation (BDcfP) in a two-personnel setting. Consequently, 502 out of 513 patients received BDcfP for analgosedation. We identified cardiovascular comorbidities, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and arterial hypertension as risk factors for periprocedural hypotension. Propofol flow rate did not correlate with hypotension. Theodrenaline and cafedrine might be used to treat periprocedural hypotension. Moreover, midazolam might be used to support the sedative effect. In conclusion, BDcfP is a safe and feasible sedative approach during interventional flexible bronchoscopy and EBUS-TBNA. In general, after the implementation of safety measures, EBUS-TBNA and interventional flexible bronchoscopy via BDcfP might safely be performed even with limited personnel. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section General Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1609 KiB  
Article
Impact of COVID-19 on Sedation Requirements during Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
by Maria Paparoupa, Marlene Fischer, Hans O. Pinnschmidt, Jörn Grensemann, Kevin Roedl, Stefan Kluge and Dominik Jarczak
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(10), 3515; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12103515 - 17 May 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1849
Abstract
COVID-19-associated ARDS (C-ARDS) is mentioned to express higher analgosedation needs, in comparison to ARDS of other etiologies. The objective of this monocentric retrospective cohort study was to compare the analgosedation needs between C-ARDS and non-COVID-19 ARDS (non-C-ARDS) on veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO). [...] Read more.
COVID-19-associated ARDS (C-ARDS) is mentioned to express higher analgosedation needs, in comparison to ARDS of other etiologies. The objective of this monocentric retrospective cohort study was to compare the analgosedation needs between C-ARDS and non-COVID-19 ARDS (non-C-ARDS) on veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO). Data were collected from the electronic medical records of all adult patients treated with C-ARDS in our Department of Intensive Care Medicine between March 2020 and April 2022. The control group included patients treated with non-C-ARDS between the years 2009 and 2020. A sedation sum score was created in order to describe the overall analgosedation needs. A total of 115 (31.5%) patients with C-ARDS and 250 (68.5%) with non-C-ARDS requiring VV-ECMO therapy were included in the study. The sedation sum score was significantly higher in the C-ARDS group (p < 0.001). COVID-19 was significantly associated with analgosedation in the univariable analysis. By contrast, the multivariable model did not show a significant association between COVID-19 and the sum score. The year of VV-ECMO support, BMI, SAPS II and prone positioning were significantly associated with sedation needs. The potential impact of COVID-19 remains unclear, and further studies are warranted in order to evaluate specific disease characteristics linked with analgesia and sedation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Epidemiology and Clinical Characteristics of COVID-19)
Show Figures

Figure 1

8 pages, 418 KiB  
Communication
Safety and Feasibility of Analgosedation for Electrochemotherapy of Liver Lesions
by Roberto Iezzi, Alessandro Posa, Cosimo Tommaso Caputo, Davide De Leoni, Fabio Sbaraglia, Marco Rossi, Giampaolo Tortora, Luca Tagliaferri, Vincenzo Valentini and Cesare Colosimo
Life 2023, 13(3), 631; https://doi.org/10.3390/life13030631 - 24 Feb 2023
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 2043
Abstract
Interventional Oncology treatments grant low-risk mini-invasive alternatives to surgery for cancer patients. Percutaneous ablative therapies represent a cornerstone for treatment of liver cancer patients. Among these, a newly emerging one is represented by electrochemotherapy. Improvements in analgesia and sedation can nowadays offer optimal [...] Read more.
Interventional Oncology treatments grant low-risk mini-invasive alternatives to surgery for cancer patients. Percutaneous ablative therapies represent a cornerstone for treatment of liver cancer patients. Among these, a newly emerging one is represented by electrochemotherapy. Improvements in analgesia and sedation can nowadays offer optimal support for ablative procedures, serving as a valid alternative to general anesthesia. The intention of this retrospective monocentric study is to report our preliminary experience on feasibility and safety of electrochemotherapy for treatment of complex liver tumors unfit for thermal ablation, using analgosedation instead of general anesthesia. Five patients were enrolled in the study, undergoing electrochemotherapy under analgosedation. Mean procedural time and hospitalization time were recorded. Immediate post-procedural cone-beam CT showed complete coverage of the lesion without complications. One-month CT examination showed an overall response rate of 100% (four complete responses, one partial response). Electrochemotherapy under analgosedation seems to be a safe, feasible, and effective option for liver cancer patients not amenable to other ablative techniques. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers in Medical Research)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 640 KiB  
Review
Analgesic Use in Patients during Cardio-Pulmonary Resuscitation
by Sebastian Dąbrowski, Sandra Lange and Andrzej Basiński
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(4), 3654; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043654 - 18 Feb 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 3011
Abstract
Introduction: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation-induced consciousness is a newly recognized phenomenon with an increasing incidence. A return of consciousness during cardiopulmonary resuscitation affects up to 0.9% of cases. Patients may also experience physical pain associated with chest compressions, as most victims of cardiac arrest who [...] Read more.
Introduction: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation-induced consciousness is a newly recognized phenomenon with an increasing incidence. A return of consciousness during cardiopulmonary resuscitation affects up to 0.9% of cases. Patients may also experience physical pain associated with chest compressions, as most victims of cardiac arrest who are subjected to resuscitative efforts sustain ribs or sternum fractures. Methods: A rapid review was carried out from August 2021 to December 2022. Results: Thirty-two articles were included in the rapid review. Of these, eleven studies focused on the return of consciousness during CPR, and twenty-one on CPR-induced chest injuries. Conclusion: A small number of studies that have dealt with the return of consciousness associated with cardiopulmonary resuscitation made it hard to clearly determine how often this occurs. There were more studies that dealt with chest trauma during resuscitation, but no study considered the use of analgesics. Of note, there was no standardized therapeutic approach as far as the use of analgesics and/or sedatives was considered. This is probably due to the lack of guidelines for analgesic management during cardiopulmonary resuscitation and peri-resuscitative period. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Perioperative Healthcare and Patient Satisfaction)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1105 KiB  
Review
Advances in Analgosedation and Periprocedural Care for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
by Sonja Skiljic, Dino Budrovac, Ana Cicvaric, Nenad Neskovic and Slavica Kvolik
Life 2023, 13(2), 473; https://doi.org/10.3390/life13020473 - 8 Feb 2023
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 4609
Abstract
The number and complexity of endoscopic gastrointestinal diagnostic and therapeutic procedures is globally increasing. Procedural analgosedation during gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures has become the gold standard of gastrointestinal endoscopies. Patient satisfaction and safety are important for the quality of the technique. Currently there are [...] Read more.
The number and complexity of endoscopic gastrointestinal diagnostic and therapeutic procedures is globally increasing. Procedural analgosedation during gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures has become the gold standard of gastrointestinal endoscopies. Patient satisfaction and safety are important for the quality of the technique. Currently there are no uniform sedation guidelines and protocols for specific gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures, and there are several challenges surrounding the choice of an appropriate analgosedation technique. These include categories of patients, choice of drug, appropriate monitoring, and medical staff providing the service. The ideal analgosedation technique should enable the satisfaction of the patient, their maximum safety and, at the same time, cost-effectiveness. Although propofol is the gold standard and the most used general anesthetic for endoscopies, its use is not without risks such as pain at the injection site, respiratory depression, and hypotension. New studies are looking for alternatives to propofol, and drugs like remimazolam and ciprofol are in the focus of researchers’ interest. New monitoring techniques are also associated with them. The optimal technique of analgosedation should provide good analgesia and sedation, fast recovery, comfort for the endoscopist, patients’ safety, and will have financial benefits. The future will show whether these new drugs have succeeded in these goals. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Endoscopic Therapy for Gastrointestinal Disease)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop