Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (2)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = Wadi Numan

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
29 pages, 24085 KB  
Article
A GIS–MCDM Framework for Soil Erosion Risk Prioritization in Arid Watersheds: Evidence from Wadi Numan, Saudi Arabia
by Oun H. Alsharif, Ahmed E. M. Al-Juaidi and Mohamed Sh. Elmanadely
Land 2026, 15(7), 1157; https://doi.org/10.3390/land15071157 - 26 Jun 2026
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 423
Abstract
Soil erosion in arid watersheds poses a significant threat to land productivity, water resources, and long-term sustainability, necessitating spatially explicit and data-driven prioritization frameworks for targeted conservation. This study developed an integrated GIS-based multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) framework to assess soil erosion susceptibility and [...] Read more.
Soil erosion in arid watersheds poses a significant threat to land productivity, water resources, and long-term sustainability, necessitating spatially explicit and data-driven prioritization frameworks for targeted conservation. This study developed an integrated GIS-based multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) framework to assess soil erosion susceptibility and prioritize twelve sub-basins (SB) of the Wadi Numan basin (683 km2), Makkah Region, Saudi Arabia. Morphometric analysis was conducted using sixteen parameters derived from a 10 m Digital Elevation Model (DEM), and Land Use/Land Cover (LULC) data were obtained from the Esri Sentinel-2 10 m dataset. Four MCDM techniques—additive ratio assessment (ARAS), complex proportional assessment (COPRAS), multi-objective optimization by ratio analysis (MOORA), and technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS)—were applied under the criteria importance through inter-criteria correlation (CRITIC) objective weighting, and their consistency was evaluated using the Spearman correlation coefficient test (SCCT) and the Kendall Tau correlation coefficient test (KTCCT). MOORA achieved the highest consistency for morphometric analysis (SCCT: 0.982; KTCCT: 0.958), while TOPSIS performed best for LULC analysis (SCCT: 0.800; KTCCT: 0.731). The final combined prioritization used MOORA for morphometric analysis and TOPSIS for LULC analysis, with proportional weighting of 72.7% and 27.3%, respectively. The scheme categorized the sub-basins into five levels of soil erosion priority. The composite ranking classified SB-9 and SB-1 under very high priority (25.94%); SB-2 and SB-3 under high priority (6.40%); SB-5, SB-6, and SB-10 under medium priority (36.37%); SB-4 and SB-8 under low priority (18.11%); and SB-11, SB-12, and SB-7 under very low priority (13.18%). This integrated method provides a practical decision-support tool for identifying and managing sub-basins susceptible to soil erosion, thereby promoting the long-term sustainability of land and water resources. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

32 pages, 13779 KB  
Article
Flood Risk Assessment of the Wadi Nu’man Basin, Mecca, Saudi Arabia (During the Period, 1988–2019) Based on the Integration of Geomatics and Hydraulic Modeling: A Case Study
by Ashraf Abdelkarim and Ahmed F.D. Gaber
Water 2019, 11(9), 1887; https://doi.org/10.3390/w11091887 - 11 Sep 2019
Cited by 37 | Viewed by 16615
Abstract
This study aims to assess the impact of flash floods in the Wadi Nu’man basin on urban areas, east of Mecca, which are subjected to frequent floods, during the period from 1988–2019. By producing and analyzing the maps of the regions, an integrated [...] Read more.
This study aims to assess the impact of flash floods in the Wadi Nu’man basin on urban areas, east of Mecca, which are subjected to frequent floods, during the period from 1988–2019. By producing and analyzing the maps of the regions, an integrated approach to geomatics and hydraulic modelling is employed. The following maps are used: Flood-prone urbanity from 1988–2019, a flood risk map of Wadi Nu’man based on a risk matrix map, and a map of the proposed protection measures and alternatives in the study area. In order to achieve these goals, changes in the land use in the Wadi Nu’man basin were monitored by analyzing successive satellite images, taken by the US satellite, Landsat, in 1988, 1998, 2013, and 2019. Using a supervised classification, with the maximum likelihood method of ERDAS IMAGINE 2016, GIS was used in the production and analysis of soil maps, and geological and hydrological groups of drainage basins, as well as the hydrological model (HEC-HMS), were applied in calculating the hydrograph curve of the Wadi Nu’man basin. The flood water volumes and flow rates were estimated based on the SCS unit hydrograph, and the rain depth was analyzed and estimated for different periods. The hydraulic modeling program (HEC-RAS) was employed, when developing a two-dimensional model to calculate the speed, depth, and spread of the flood, in order to apply the risk matrix method. The recommendations based on this study give priority to the implementation of a flood prevention plan and the protection of infrastructure by maintaining the existing flood drainage facilities and establishing new drainage facilities to protect lives, property, and infrastructure. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Assessing Surface and Ground- Water Vulnerability and Pollution Risk)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop