Search Results (40)

Lung transplant recipients are at increased risk of severe COVID-19 due to lifelong immunosuppressive therapy, which impairs both innate and adaptive immune responses. Identifying effective supportive therapies is essential for mitigating the heightened vulnerability of this population. This study investigated the effects of tixagevimab/cilgavimab, a monoclonal antibody therapy, as pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in this population. A prospective study was conducted on 19 lung transplant recipients at Padua University Hospital, Italy, during the Omicron variant wave (May–June 2022). Participants received tixagevimab/cilgavimab intramuscularly and were monitored for 180 days. SARS-CoV-2-specific antibody levels were measured at baseline (T0), one month (T1), and three months (T3) post-treatment. Cytokine profiles and clinical outcomes, including SARS-CoV-2 infections, were also assessed. At baseline, 50% of patients had negative antibody responses, but one-month post-treatment, all patients exceeded 700 kBAU/mL (median 3870 kBAU/mL), with levels decreasing but remaining positive at three months (median 1670 kBAU/mL). Remarkably, a higher level of circulating IL-18 was found at T3 in comparison to T0 in patients who did not experience COVID-19 after PrEP. This finding aligns with IL-18’s primary role in stimulating type-1 T helper (Th1) cell responses, necessary for the induction of virus-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs). These results suggest that tixagevimab/cilgavimab may induce a systemic immune signature that could contribute to priming the immune response against SARS-CoV-2, potentially mediated by interactions with immune cell subsets. Full article

Background: COVID-19 continues to pose a threat to immunocompromised individuals, even with vaccination. The monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) tixagevimab/cilgavimab (TXG/CIL) provide targeted prophylaxis against SARS-CoV-2 with the benefit of a prolonged half-life. Although approved for COVID-19 prevention, there is limited data on their effectiveness among heavily immunocompromised populations. Methods: We conducted a prospective, observational study at Laiko General Hospital, Athens, Greece, from August to December 2022 to investigate the efficacy of TXG/CIL as a form of pre-exposure prophylaxis in immunocompromised patients. Data on breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infections were collected over a six-month follow-up period. Results: Of the 375 participants (mean age 61.3 ± 14.1 years; 59.7% male), 76 (20.3%) developed breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infections, with an incidence of 3.81 cases/100 patient months. Hospitalization was required for 21 patients (5.6%), with a median stay of 14 days. Seven deaths were recorded, with only one attributed to COVID-19. Previous infection (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.26–0.82) and hybrid immunity (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.29–0.92) can protect against new infection. Solid organ malignancy significantly increased the risk of severe outcomes among those infected (OR 7.4, 95% CI 2.2–24.7, p = 0.001). Conclusions: TXG/CIL provides effective prophylaxis against COVID-19 in immunocompromised patients. Future strategies should focus on developing new mAb combinations to address emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants and protect vulnerable populations. Full article

Patients with hematologic malignancies still face a significant risk of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-neutralizing monoclonal antibody combination tixagevimab/cilgavimab (TIX/CGB) could be administered to immunocompromised patients for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) before the emergence of TIX/CGB-resistant COVID-19 Omicron variants. TIX/CGB application could be carried out regardless of the host’s immune response to previous active SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations or infections. Because the efficacy of COVID-19 PrEP remains unclear, especially in SARS-CoV-2-seropositive patients, German national guidelines recommended TIX/CGB PrEP only for SARS-CoV-2-seronegative patients in addition to an intensified active vaccination schedule. Having followed these guidelines, we now report the characteristics and outcomes of 54 recipients of TIX/CGB PrEP in SARS-CoV-2-seronegative patients with hematological disease from a German tertiary medical center and compare them to 125 seropositive patients who did not receive any PrEP. While the number of patients with B-cell lymphomas was significantly higher in the seronegative cohort (33 (61%) vs. 18 (14%) cases, p < 0.01), patients with myeloid diseases were significantly more frequent in the seropositive cohort (51 (41%) vs. 5 (9%) cases, p < 0.01). Strikingly, patients who had undergone allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation were significantly more likely (forty-nine (39%) vs. six (11%) cases, p < 0.01) to be SARS-CoV-2 seropositive. We observed that prophylactic application of TIX/CGB PrEP to a highly vulnerable group of SARS-CoV-2-seronegative patients resulted in a similar number of COVID-19 breakthrough infections compared to the untreated seropositive control group (16 (32%) vs. 39 (36%), p = 0.62) and comparable COVID-19-related outcomes like hospitalization and oxygen requirement throughout an extended follow-up period of 12 months. In conclusion, our results support the tailored approach of administering TIX/CGB PrEP only to SARS-CoV-2-seronegative patients during the COVID-19 pandemic and might provide a rationale for similar strategies during future outbreaks/diseases, especially in times of initial limited availability and/or financial constraints. Full article

Objective. We aimed to report the real-world use and outcomes over time in immunocompromised individuals receiving tixagevimab/cilgavimab (T/C) pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Methods. This observational study included participants who received T/C PrEP, categorized into three groups: (i) No COVID-19 (NoC), i.e., participants who never had COVID-19; (ii) Hybrids (H), i.e., participants who had COVID-19 before PrEP; and (iii) Break-through Infections (BTIs), i.e., participants who had COVID-19 after PrEP. The study measured several immune markers at the administration of T/C (T0) at 3 (T1), 6 (T2), and 9 (T3) months afterward. These markers included: anti-receptor-binding domain (RBD) IgG antibodies; BA.5-neutralizing antibodies (nAbs); mucosal IgG; and T cell immunity. The incidence rate ratios for BTIs were analyzed using a Poisson regression model. Results. A total of 231 participants with a median age of 63 years (IQR 54.0–73.0). were included. Among these, 84% had hematological diseases and received a median of three vaccine doses. N = 72 participants belonged to the NoC group, N = 103 to the H group, and n = 56 to the BTI group (24%), with most BTIs being mild/moderate. The incidence rate (IR) of BTIs was 4.2 per 100 patient-months (95% CI 3.2–5.4), with no associated risk factors identified. There was a significant increase in anti-RBD IgG levels 3 months after the T/C administration in all groups, followed by a decline at 6 months, whereas at the same time points, geometric mean titers (GMTs) of anti-BA.5 nAbs were low for all groups and were around or below the detection threshold. No significant changes were observed in IFN-γ levels. The mucosal immune response was observed only 3 months after the PrEP administration. Conclusion. We provided a real-world experience model on the clinical efficacy of T/C PrEP in preventing severe COVID-19 during the Omicron wave through a comprehensive virological and immunological study. While waiting for the arrival of new monoclonal antibodies that can effectively neutralize the most recent variants, T/C PrEP remains the only viable strategy in the available armamentarium today to prevent COVID-19 complications in an extremely fragile population with suboptimal immune responses to COVID-19 vaccines. Full article

Lung transplant recipients (LTRs) respond poorly to vaccination. SARS-CoV-2 pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) with tixagevimab/cilgavimab (TIX/CIL) reduces the incidence of infection and the evolution to severe COVID-19. In vitro data show decreased activity against Omicron variants. We evaluated the clinical efficacy and safety of TIX/CIL in LTRs during the Omicron wave. A prospective observational cohort study was conducted at ISMETT in Palermo (Italy). In June 2022, SARS-CoV-2 PrEP with TIX/CIL 150/150 mg was offered to LTRs. LTRs who received TIX/CIL were compared to LTRs who did not. Logistic regression analysis (adjusted for prior COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, age, years from transplant, and rejection) was performed. The objective of this study was to compare the following among the two populations: prevalence of SARS-CoV-2, length of SARS-CoV-2 positivity, and COVID-19 disease severity. Among 110 eligible LTRs, 79 (72%) received TIX/CIL and 31 (28%) did not. SARS-CoV-2 infections occurred in 6% (n = 5) of patients who received TIX/CIL and 29% (n = 9) of patients who did not (p < 0.001). In both groups, infections were mild/asymptomatic, and no one was hospitalized or died. At multivariate analysis, TIX/CIL was associated with a lower risk of infection (aOR 0.22; 95%CI 0.06–0.78; p = 0.02). TIX/CIL was safe and effective in reducing the risk of SARS-CoV-2 in LTRs during the Omicron wave. Full article

Despite emerging evidence indicating that molecular SARS-CoV-2 tests performed on saliva have diagnostic sensitivity and specificity comparable to those observed with nasopharyngeal swabs (NPSs), most in vivo follow-up studies on the efficacy of drugs against SARS-CoV-2 have been performed on NPSs, not considering saliva as a possible alternative matrix. For this reason, in this study, we used, in parallel, saliva and NPS samples for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 by real-time RT-PCR in patients receiving Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab, Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir, or Sotrovimab as a treatment against SARS-CoV-2. Our results showed a good correlation between the NPS and saliva samples for each drug; moreover, comparable changes in the cycle threshold (Ct) levels in saliva and NPSs were observed both 7 days and 30 days after treatment, thus confirming that the saliva represents a good matrix for in vivo follow-up studies verifying the effectiveness of treatments against SARS-CoV-2. Full article

Monoclonal antibodies have been administered to kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) with a poor or non-responder status to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. The cellular response to SARS-CoV-2 has been poorly studied in this context. We assessed the T cell response to SARS-CoV-2 in 97 patients on the day of the injection of tixagevimab/cilgavimab using an IFNγ enzyme-linked immunospot assay (ELISPOT). Among the 97 patients, 34 (35%) developed COVID-19 before the injection. Twenty-nine (85.3%) had an ELISPOT compatible with a SARS-CoV-2 infection. There was no difference between KTRs under belatacept or tacrolimus treatment. Sixty-three patients (64.9%) had no known COVID-19 prior to the ELISPOT, but nine (14.3%) had a positive ELISPOT. In 21 KTRs with a positive ELISPOT who received a booster dose of a bivalent mRNA vaccine, median antibody titers and spike-reactive T cells increased significantly in patients under tacrolimus but not belatacept. Our study emphasizes the potential usefulness of the exploration of immune cellular response to SARS-CoV-2 by ELISPOT. In KTRs with a positive ELISPOT and under CNI therapy, a booster dose of mRNA vaccine seems effective in inducing an immune response to SARS-CoV-2. Full article

Background: Patients treated with hemato-oncological malignancies (HO) or undergoing cellular therapies such as hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) or chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T) were significantly affected by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Despite the success of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, immunocompromised patients remain at increased risk for severe coronavirus disease (COVID-19), rendering this group of population a high priority for additional prevention and treatment options. Tixagevimab and Cilgavimab (TIXA/CILGA, AZD7442, Evusheld^®) is a combination of two fully human, long-acting monoclonal antibodies. TIXA/CILGA have been approved as pre-exposure prophylaxis and treatment in patients at risk of severe disease with impaired vaccine response. Our objective was to describe the efficacy and safety among immunocompromised pediatric patients. Methods: This was an observational multicenter cohort study of immunocompromised pediatric patients receiving TIXA/CILGA conducted at nine Polish centers of Pediatric Oncology, Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation. We analyzed patients in two groups; those treated with HO and those undergoing cellular therapies: HSCT or CAR-T cells. In addition, two other cohorts were identified: patients given TIXA/CILGA as pre-exposure prophylactic and therapeutic intervention. Results: A total of 78 patients were evaluated during the study period: 69 (88.5%) received TIXA/CILGA as pre-exposure prophylaxis and 9 (11.5%) as a treatment strategy. A total of 52 (66.6%) patients were treated with standard chemotherapy at HO departments; 21 (27%) underwent HSCT, and 5 (6.4%) received CAR-T cell therapy. All children with COVID-19 receiving TIXA/CILGA presented a mild degree of severity. The most common clinical manifestations were fever, cough and coryza. At least one adverse event (AE) was reported in two (3.8%) patients excluding standard injection site reactions. Reported AEs were mild or moderate in intensity. One child reported mild myalgia and one reported moderate bone pain and weakness. Conclusions: In our observational multicenter cohort study, we explored the use of TIXA/CILGA as pre-exposure prophylaxis and treatment for COVID-19 among immunocompromised pediatric patients. While our findings suggest a potential benefit in preventing and managing COVID-19 in this vulnerable population, it is important to note the study’s non-comparative design. Our results highlight the need for well-designed clinical trials to confirm these observations and further assess the efficacy and safety of TIXA/CILGA in immunocompromised children. Full article

Background: Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) are likely to develop severe COVID-19 and are less well-protected by vaccines than immunocompetent subjects. Thus, the use of neutralizing anti–SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to confer a passive immunity appears attractive in KTRs. Methods: This retrospective monocentric cohort study was conducted between 1 January 2022 and 30 September 2022. All KTRs with a weak antibody response one month after three doses of mRNA vaccine (anti spike IgG < 264 (BAU/mL)) have received tixagevimab-cilgavimab in pre-exposure (group 1), post-exposure (group 2) or no specific treatment (group 3). We compared COVID-19 symptomatic hospitalizations, including intensive care unit hospitalizations, oxygen therapy, and death, between the three groups. Results: A total of 418 KTRs had SARS-CoV-2 infection in 2022. During the study period, we included 112 KTRs in group 1, 40 KTRs in group 2, and 27 KTRs in group 3. The occurrence of intensive care unit hospitalization, oxygen therapy, and COVID-19 death was significantly increased in group 3 compared to group 1 or 2. In group 3, 5 KTRs (18.5%) were admitted to the intensive care unit, 7 KTRs (25.9%) needed oxygen therapy, and 3 KTRs (11.1%) died. Patients who received tixagevimab-cilgavimab pre- or post-exposure had similar outcomes. Conclusions: This retrospective real-life study supports the relative effectiveness of tixagevimab-cilgavimab on COVID-19 infection caused by Omicron, used as a pre- or post-exposure therapy. The continued evolution of Omicron variants has made tixagevimab-cilgavimab ineffective and reinforces the need for new therapeutic monoclonal antibodies for COVID-19 active on new variants. Full article

Background: this study aims to evaluate the efficacy of tixagevimab/cilgavimab (Evusheld™) against various SARS-CoV-2 variants, including newer Omicron sublineages, in an immunocompromised cohort and in vitro. Study design: Conducted in Italy, this research involves immunocompromised patients who received Evusheld. It evaluates serum neutralization activity against different SARS-CoV-2 strains (20A.EU1, BA.5, BQ.1, XBB.1.5, XBB.1.16, and EG.5) before (T0), after 14 (T1), and after 30 (T2) days from the tixagevimab/cilgavimab injection. Furthermore, the in vitro activity of Evusheld against SARS-CoV-2 VOCs was evaluated. Results: The cohort was composed of 72 immunocompromised patients. The serum neutralizing activity of tixagevimab/cilgavimab-treated patients was notably lower against newer variants such as BQ.1, XBB.1.5, XBB.1.16, and EG.5. Then, the in vitro study detailed specific EC50 values to quantify the activity of tixagevimab/cilgavimab against various SARS-CoV-2 VOCs. Newer variants like BQ.1 and XBB.1.5 exhibited notably lower neutralization, underscoring the challenges in effectively countering the evolving virus. Interestingly, tixagevimab/cilgavimab maintained reduced but still valid activity against EG.5 with an EC50 of 189 ng/mL and Cmax/EC90 of 110.7. Conclusions: Tixagevimab/cilgavimab efficacy wanes against novel subvariants. This underscores the critical need for ongoing adaptation and vigilance in prophylactic strategies to effectively counter the dynamic and unpredictable nature of the COVID-19 pandemic. Full article

Combination antiviral therapy may be helpful in the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection; however, no clinical trial data are available, and combined use of direct-acting antivirals (DAA) and monoclonal antibodies (mAb) has been reported only anecdotally. To assess the cooperative effects of dual drug combinations in vitro, we used a VERO E6 cell-based in vitro system with the ancestral B.1 or the highly divergent BQ.1.1 virus to test pairwise combinations of the licensed DAA, including nirmatrelvir (NRM), remdesivir (RDV) and the active metabolite of molnupiravir (EIDD-1931) as well the combination of RDV with four licensed mAbs (sotrovimab, bebtelovimab, cilgavimab, tixagevimab; tested only with the susceptible B.1 virus). According to SynergyFinder 3.0 summary and weighted scores, all the combinations had an additive effect. Within DAA/DAA combinations, paired scores with the B.1 and BQ.1.1 variants were comparable. In the post hoc analysis weighting synergy by concentrations, several cases of highly synergistic scores were detected at specific drug concentrations, both for DAA/DAA and for RDV/mAb combinations. This was supported by in vitro confirmation experiments showing a more than a linear shift of a drug-effective concentration (IC₅₀) at increasing concentrations of the companion drug, although the effect was prominent with DAA/DAA combinations and minimal or null with RDV/mAb combinations. These results support the cooperative effects of dual drug combinations in vitro, which should be further investigated in animal models before introduction into the clinic. Full article

Vaccines against the SARS-CoV-2 virus were authorized for use by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the United States and have proven effective for the prevention of morbidity and death from COVID-19. Certain immunosuppressant medications prevent the development of protective immunity following COVID-19 vaccination. In December 2021, the FDA issued an emergency use authorization (EUA) for a monoclonal-antibody combination of tixagevimab and cilgavimab, under the brand name Evusheld, for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) against COVID-19 for individuals with moderate-to-severe immune compromise. While a 77% reduction in symptomatic COVID-19 was observed in the PROVENT study, the trial was conducted prior to emergence of the B.1.1.529 Omicron variant. We suspected reduced efficacy of PrEP against Omicron subvariants. We conducted a retrospective cohort study comparing the prevalence of symptomatic COVID-19 infections between 1 January 2022 and 1 July 2022 in eligible patients treated with PrEP versus untreated using a questionnaire administered with the REDCap survey tool. Responses from 235 participants were included in the final analysis, with 176 untreated respondents and 59 in the PrEP cohort. Symptomatic COVID-19 infections were reported in 50 (28.4%) untreated participants and only 9 (15.3%) of those who received PrEP (p = 0.0557; OR 0.4536; 95% CI 0.2046 to 0.9599). Only two participants were hospitalized for COVID-19 infection, both in the untreated cohort. The reduction in COVID-19 infections did not achieve statistical significance, indicating diminished efficacy against Omicron variants. Full article

Background and Objectives: In addition to a suboptimal and rapidly diminishing response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine, hemodialysis (HD) patients are at risk for developing a severe COVID-19 infection. In 2022, the combination of cilgavimab and tixagevimab (Evusheld, AstraZeneca) was approved for COVID-19 preexposure prophylaxis in high-risk groups. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the humoral response and short-term safety of this antibody combination in a group of HD patients. Materials and Methods: Seventy-three adult maintenance hemodialysis patients were recruited from a tertiary-care hospital for this double-blinded, non-randomized, placebo-controlled study. Patients were placed into two groups: the intervention group (n = 43) received a single 300 mg dosage of cilgavimab and tixagevimab, while the control group (n = 30) received a saline placebo. The titer of COVID-19-neutralizing antibodies was measured at baseline and after 1 and 6 months. The patients were evaluated for any drug-related adverse effects and monitored for six months for the emergence of any COVID-19-related events. Results: Patients in the intervention group were substantially older and had been on HD for longer (p = 0.002 and 0.006, respectively). The baseline antibody levels were higher in the Evusheld group. The antibody level in the intervention group increased significantly after 1 month and remained consistent for 6 months, whereas the antibody level in the control group fell significantly after 6 months during the study period (Wald χ² = 30.620, p < 0.001). The drug-related adverse effects were modest and well-tolerated, and only seven patients experienced them. Six months after study enrollment, 10 patients in the intervention group and 6 patients in the control group had been infected with COVID-19, respectively. In the control group, ICU admission and mortality were observed, but in the intervention group, the infection was milder with no aggressive consequences. Conclusions: This study demonstrated the short-term safety and efficacy of tixagevimab–cilgavimab for COVID-19 preexposure prophylaxis in HD patients. These findings require more studies with more HD patients and longer follow-up periods. Full article

Background and Objectives: Underpowered immune response to vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 was observed in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. A novel combination of monoclonal antibodies tixagevimab-cilgavimab (TGM/CGM) received authorization as pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in those with reduced response to vaccine. We aimed to evaluate the response rate to COVID-19 vaccination in kidney transplant (KT), compared to liver transplant (LT) recipients, and the efficacy and safety of PrEP with TGM/CGM. Material and Methods: Between March and November 2022, adult KT and LT recipients who had completed the vaccination schedule (3 doses) were tested for anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies titer. SOT recipients with anti-SARS-CoV-2 titer ≥ 100 IU/mL were considered protected against infection, while those with titer < 100 UI/mL were defined non-protected. Patients with inadequate response were invited to PrEP. Results: In total, 306 patients were enrolled [KT:197 (64.4%), LT:109 (35.6%)]. After the complete scheme of vaccination, 246 (80.3%) patients developed a protective titer, while 60 (19.6%) did not have a protective titer. KT recipients had a lower rate of protective anti-COVID-19 titer compared to LT patients [149 (75.6%) vs. 97 (89.0%), p = 0.004]. Recipients with non-protective anti-COVID-19 titer received mainly tacrolimus-based regimen associated with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (70%) e steroids (46.7%) as maintenance immunosuppression, while those treated with everolimus were associated with higher protective titer. Of 35 (58.3%) patients who received PrEP, within 12 months, 6 (17.1%) (all KT) developed pauci-symptomatic COVID-19 disease, while 15/25 (60%) of non-responders, who did not receive the prophylaxis, developed COVID-19 disease. After PrEP, hospitalization rate was lower (2.8% vs. 16%), and no adverse events, neither graft loss nor rejection, were observed. Conclusions: Despite complete COVID-19 vaccination, SOT recipients might be not protected from the SARS-CoV-2 infection, especially after KT. In non-protected SOT patients, the subsequent pre-exposure prophylaxis with combination of monoclonal antibodies (TGM/CGM) might be an efficacy and safe strategy to prevent COVID-19 severe disease and hospitalization. Full article

An 81-year-old woman undergoing B-cell depletion therapy developed COVID-19 and a hyperglycemic hyperosmotic state. She had a history of multiple vaccinations against coronaviruses but had persistent antigen positivity. Strategies to prevent the development of COVID-19 in immunosuppressed patients have not been established. Moreover, there is no standard treatment for prolonged antigen positivity. In this case, we were able to follow IgG antibodies during the course of treatment. The absence of N-IgG antibody titer elevation despite an effective immune response triggered by the vaccine is of great interest. The impaired humoral response observed in patients with lymphoma after anti-CD20 treatment implies the need for a justified different vaccination strategy for these patients. Furthermore, negative N-IgG titers in the immunosuppressed state may serve as an indicator of resistance to therapy. Full article