Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (2)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = Selachii

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
19 pages, 6200 KB  
Article
Demographic Characteristics of Elasmobranch Fishes in the Khor Faridah Region (Abu Dhabi) Using a Stereo-BRUVS Approach
by Stephan Bruns, Shamsa Al Hameli and Aaron C. Henderson
Diversity 2026, 18(1), 29; https://doi.org/10.3390/d18010029 - 6 Jan 2026
Viewed by 1128
Abstract
The elasmobranch fauna was studied in the Khor Faridah region of Abu Dhabi, which is a mangrove-dominated inshore habitat historically reported to host a diversity of elasmobranch species. A stereo-baited remote underwater video system (Stereo-BRUVS) survey was conducted from September 2021 to August [...] Read more.
The elasmobranch fauna was studied in the Khor Faridah region of Abu Dhabi, which is a mangrove-dominated inshore habitat historically reported to host a diversity of elasmobranch species. A stereo-baited remote underwater video system (Stereo-BRUVS) survey was conducted from September 2021 to August 2022 to assess the species diversity and relative abundance of elasmobranch fishes. A total of 12 elasmobranch taxa were encountered during the study, consisting of five rays (Myliobatiformes), four sharks (Selachii), two wedgefish and one guitarfish (Rhinopristiformes). The area was dominated by honeycomb-patterned rays in the genus Himantura and the Critically Endangered Arabic whipray Maculabatis arabica. Since Himantura uarnak and H. leoparda could not be reliably distinguished from footage, all sex- and size-based results are reported for a combined Himantura species complex and should be interpreted cautiously. Furthermore, the broad size range of individuals found in the area highlights its importance to all life stages of these taxa. This underlines the need for a conservation strategy to avoid detrimental changes to the elasmobranch fauna due to ongoing coastal development. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Marine Diversity)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

30 pages, 9713 KB  
Review
A Review of the Paleobiology of Some Neogene Sharks and the Fossil Records of Extant Shark Species
by Olaf Höltke, Erin E. Maxwell and Michael W. Rasser
Diversity 2024, 16(3), 147; https://doi.org/10.3390/d16030147 - 26 Feb 2024
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 10656
Abstract
In recent years, new findings and new methods (stable isotopes of oxygen, zinc, and nitrogen; 2D and 3D modeling; and geometric morphometric analyses of the teeth) have enhanced our knowledge of the Neogene shark fauna and its paleobiology. Several papers deal with the [...] Read more.
In recent years, new findings and new methods (stable isotopes of oxygen, zinc, and nitrogen; 2D and 3D modeling; and geometric morphometric analyses of the teeth) have enhanced our knowledge of the Neogene shark fauna and its paleobiology. Several papers deal with the large Otodus (Megaselachus) species, including the construction of a 3D model, as well as insights into its lifestyle and diet. In addition, the skeletal remains of Carcharias gustrowensis, Carcharodon hastalis, and Keasius parvus and a natural tooth set of Carcharodon hubbelli have been described in the last 13 years, and the dentition of the Neogene species Carcharoides catticus, Megachasma applegatei, and Parotodus benedenii has been reconstructed. Stable isotope analyses of the teeth from the Neogene species of Araloselachus, Carcharias, Carcharodon, Galeocerdo, Hemipristris, and Mitsukurina have given insights into the trophic positions of these genera during the Neogene, and shark teeth preserved near the skeletal remains of prey animals (mammals) and shark bite traces on these remains provide direct evidence of trophic interactions. The tooth shape, fossil locality, and paleoenvironment have been used to better understand the taxa Carcharhinus dicelmai, Megalolamna paradoxodon, Pachyscyllium dachiardii, and P. distans. Among extant species, Galeorhinus galeus can be traced back to the Eocene. Alopias superciliosus, Rhincodon typus, and possibly A. vulpinus can be traced back to the Oligocene. Species present by the Miocene include Alopias vulpinus, Carcharhinus amblyrhynchoides, C. amblyrhynchos, C. albimarginatus, C. amboinensis, C. brachyurus, C. brevipinna, C. falciformis, C. glaucus, C. leucas, C. limbatus, C. longimanus, C. macloti, C. obscurus, C. perezi, C. sealei, Centrophorus granulosus, Cetorhinus maximus, Dalatias licha, Deania calcea, Galeocerdo cuvier, Glyphis glyphis, Heptranchias perlo, Isurus paucus, Lamna nasus, Negaprion brevirostris, Odontaspis ferox, Pseudocarcharias kamoharai, Sphyrna media, S. mokarran, and possibly Carcharodon carcharias. First appearing in the Pliocene are Scymnodon ringens, Somniosus rostratus, and Zameus squamulosus. For some extant species (Carcharias taurus, Hexanchus griseus, Isurus oxyrinchus, Notorynchus cepedianus, and Sphyrna zygaena), it is not clear whether the assigned Neogene teeth represent the same species. The application of new methods to more fossil shark taxa, a detailed search for shark fossils, and better knowledge of the dentition of extant species (especially those with minute-sized teeth) will further enhance our knowledge of the evolution and paleobiology of sharks. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Shark Ecology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop