Search Results (9)

Background/purpose: Fiber-reinforced materials are commonly used as biobases beneath indirect restorations, potentially affecting the seating and marginal accuracy of the restorations. This study intended to assess the impact of various biobase techniques on the marginal adaptation of lithium disilicate overlay restorations. Methods: Fifty sound maxillary first premolar teeth of comparable dimensions were prepared using a full-bevel overlay design (3 mm occlusal reduction) and allocated randomly to five groups as follows (n = 10): Group A, delayed dentin sealing; Group B, immediate dentin sealing using Optibond FL; Group C, immediate dentin sealing with a 1 mm flowable composite layer (Clearfil AP-X Flow); Group D, immediate dentin sealing followed by a 1 mm short-fiber-reinforced composite layer (everX Flow); and Group E, immediate dentin sealing coated with a 1 mm flowable composite layer reinforced with polyethylene Ribbond fibers. Digital impressions were obtained using a Medit i700 intraoral scanner, and the overlays were digitally designed via the Sirona inLab CAD software and milled via a four-axis milling machine. The overlays were luted with a preheated composite (Clearfil AP-X). Marginal gap assessments were conducted pre- and post-cementation via a digital microscope at 230× magnification. The data were statistically analyzed using a one-way analysis of variance and paired t-tests. Results: The one-way ANOVA disclosed no significant differences among the groups before or after cementation (p > 0.05). Conclusions: The presence or absence of fiber-reinforced biobases did not impact the marginal adaptation of the restorations; these biobases can be incorporated to optimize the mechanical behavior of indirect restorations without adversely affecting their seating accuracy. These findings suggest that fiber-reinforced and non-reinforced biobase techniques can be safely integrated into clinical adhesive protocols to enhance the mechanical performance of restorations without comprising their marginal adaptation. Full article

Objectives: Trauma to maxillary incisors is frequent, and requires timely, conservative management for optimal prognosis. This in vitro study evaluated the fracture resistance (FR) and orthodontic bracket bond strength (BS) of incisors following incisal fragment reattachment using various restorative techniques. Materials and Methods: Two independent tests—FR testing (Newtons) and BS testing (megapascals)—were conducted. Eighty intact human maxillary central incisors (n = 40/test), standardized in size and shape using a digital caliper (Mitutoyo, ±0.01 mm), were embedded in acrylic resin and numbered. An uncomplicated crown fracture was induced in 64 teeth (n = 32/test), and the teeth were randomly assigned (simple randomization using Excel’s RAND function) to five groups (n = 8/group/test): (1) intact teeth (negative control, NC); (2) nanohybrid composite buildup using Filtek Z250 and Single Bond 2 (positive control, CB); (3) fragment reattachment using flowable composite (Filtek Supreme, FL); (4) reattachment with a palatal veneer using a nanohybrid composite (PV); and (5) reattachment reinforced with a polyethylene fiber band (Ribbond Inc., RB). In BS testing groups, stainless steel orthodontic brackets (PINNACLE) were bonded using Transbond XT, centered over the fracture line. Light curing was performed using an LED unit (Mini LED Standard, Acteon, 1250 mW/cm², 20 s/bond, 40 s/composite, 2 mm curing tip distance). Specimens were stored in distilled water at room temperature for 24 h before reattachment. FR and BS were evaluated using a universal testing machine (Instron) until failure. Failure modes were analyzed, and data were statistically evaluated using one-way ANOVA, Tukey’s post hoc test, and Pearson’s correlation analysis. Results: Significant differences were observed among groups for both FR and BS (p < 0.05). The NC group exhibited the highest FR (514.4 N) and BS (17.6 MPa). The RB group recorded the second-highest FR (324.6), followed by the PV (234.6), CB (224.9), and FL (203.7) groups. The CB group demonstrated the second-best BS (16.6), followed by the RB (15.2), FL (13.4), and PV (6.5) groups. FR and BS were negatively correlated. Mixed failures predominated in the reattachment groups, except for the PV group, which showed mainly adhesive failures. In BS testing, mixed failures dominated in the NC and CB groups, while adhesive failures predominated in the PV and FL groups. Conclusions: Ribbond reinforcement improves the mechanical performance of reattached incisal fragments, and composite buildup may provide more reliable bracket bonding than fragment reattachment. Clinical Relevance: In cases where biomimetic, minimally invasive reattachment is indicated, Ribbond fiber reinforcement appears to offer a reliable restorative solution. Full article

Objectives: The objectives of this study were to investigate in vitro BPA release from two common fiberglass fixed lingual canine-to-canine retainers and to compare these amounts with those released from a conventional multistranded stainless-steel orthodontic retainer. Methods: Fifty-four recently extracted teeth were divided into groups of six teeth each, formed in an arch shape. Three different retainer types were evaluated: Ribbond, EverStick Ortho and Wildcut wire. Three identical specimens were constructed for each retainer type. BPA release was determined with validated the liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry method at 1 and 24 h, as well as at 7, 14 and 30 days. The method’s limits of detection and quantification were 0.32 ng/mL and 0.96 ng/mL, respectively. A two-way mixed, repeated-measures analysis of variance with Greenhouse–Geisser correction was employed to verify the existence of any significant differences. Results: Higher levels of BPA were released from the polyethylene fiber and glass fiber retainer in comparison with the conventional retainer in the present study. The differences between the systems over time were not statistically significant at the 95% confidence level. Conclusions: In vitro BPA release during the first month did not differ between the examined retainer types. The highest BPA concentrations were observed at 1 month. Full article

Recent advancements in biomimetic dentistry have introduced innovative materials designed to better simulate natural dentin. One such material is Ribbond^®, long polyethylene fiber. It is particularly effective in absorbing and redistributing masticatory forces in teeth with substantial dentin loss. This review aims to analyze the literature on the biomimetic restorative technique using long polyethylene fiber and assess its benefits and indications relative to traditional cusp coverage restorations. Methods: A search was conducted in the PubMed database until March 2024. The authors selected in vitro studies that studied long polyethylene fiber as a dentin reinforcement. Results: From 247 potentially relevant articles, eighteen studies were included in the review. A detailed analysis of the reviewed literature was summarized into three principal sections involving the use of long polyethylene fiber in restorative dentistry. Conclusions: Long polyethylene fibers improve fracture resistance and promote favorable fracture modes, helping to mitigate the shrinkage forces in composite restorations. However, their clinical significance over traditional cusp coverage is unclear. Full article

Provisional fixed partial dentures represent a critical phase in dental treatment, necessitating heightened mechanical durability, particularly in comprehensive and extended treatment plans. Strengthening these structures with various reinforcing materials offers a method to enhance their resilience. Utilizing a three-point testing methodology on standardized trial specimens allows for a comparative assessment of various materials and reinforcement techniques for pre-prosthetic applications. This study aims to validate and assess the significance of integrating different reinforcing materials into standardized test bodies. The study focuses on test specimens comprising three types of unreinforced laboratory and clinical polymers for provisional constructions (n = 6)—heat-cured PMMA (Superpont C+B, Spofa Dental, Czech Republic), CAD-CAM prefabricated PMMA (DD temp MED, Dental Direkt, Germany), CAD-CAM printing resin (Temporary CB Resin, FormLabs, USA), self-polymerizing PEMA (DENTALON plus, Kulzer, Germany), light-polymerizing composite (Revotek LC, GC, Japan), and dual-polymerizing composite (TempSpan, Pentron, USA). Additionally, laboratory polymers are evaluated in groups with five types of reinforcing filaments (n = 15)—Glass Fiber (Fiber Splint One-Layer, Polydentia, Switzerland), Polyethylene thread (Ribbond Regular 4.0 mm, Ribbond Inc., USA), triple-stranded chrome-cobalt wire for splinting 015″ (Leone S.p.a., Italy), Aesthetic ligature wire 012″ (Leone S.p.a., Italy), and Glass Fiber coated with light-cured composite 8.5 × 0.2 mm (Interlig, Angelus, Brazil). Analysis of the data using Generalized Linear Models (GLMs) reveals that the experimental bodies, produced via the subtractive digital method using PMMA (DD temp MED, Dental Direkt GmbH, Germany) as the polymer and glass filaments as the reinforcement, exhibit superior mechanical properties, particularly when pre-wetted with Interlig liquid composite (Angelus, Brazil). Full article

Background: Mesio–occluso–distal (MOD) cavity preparations are often fragile due to the amount of tooth and carious structure removed. MOD cavities can often fracture if left unsupported. Aim: The study investigated the maximum fracture load of mesi–occluso–distal cavities restored using direct composite resin restorations with various reinforcement techniques. Method: Seventy-two freshly extracted, intact human posterior teeth were disinfected, checked, and prepared according to predetermined standards for mesio–occluso–distal cavity design (MOD). The teeth were assigned randomly into six groups. The first group was the control group restored conventionally with a nanohybrid composite resin (Group I). The other five groups were restored with a nanohybrid composite resin reinforced with different techniques: the ACTIVA BioACTIVE-Restorative and -Liner as a dentin substitute and layered with a nanohybrid composite (Group II); the everX Posterior composite resin layered with a nanohybrid composite (Group III); polyethylene fibers called “Ribbond” placed on both axial walls and the floor of the cavity, and layered with a nanohybrid composite (Group IV); polyethylene fibers placed on both axial walls and the floor of the cavity, and layered with the ACTIVA BioACTIVE-Restorative and -Liner as a dentin substitute and nanohybrid composite (Group V); and polyethylene fibers placed on both axial walls and the floor of the cavity and layered with the everX posterior composite resin and nanohybrid composite (Group VI). All teeth were subjected to thermocycling to simulate the oral environment. The maximum load was measured using a universal testing machine. Results: The highest maximum load was exhibited by Group III with the everX posterior composite resin, followed by Group IV, Group VI, Group I, Group II, and Group V. A statistically significant difference was demonstrated between groups (p = 0.0023). When adjusting for multiple comparisons, there were statistical differences specific to comparisons between Group III versus I, Group III versus II, Group IV versus II, and Group V versus III. Conclusions: Within the limitations of the current study, it can be concluded that a higher maximum load resistance can be achieved (statistically significant) when reinforcing nanohybrid composite resin MOD restorations with everX Posterior. Full article

This in vitro study aimed to compare the fracture strength of direct non-reinforced class II composite resin restorations and polyethylene fiber-reinforced restorations, and also to investigate the influence of the locations of polyethylene fibers within the cavity on the fracture strength. Sixty freshly extracted human teeth were disinfected and prepared (class II cavity design). The teeth were assigned randomly into four groups (n = 13). Group I (control) was restored with nano-hybrid composite resin. The other three experimental groups were restored with the same composite resin material reinforced by polyethylene fibers (Ribbond) at different locations. Fibers were placed either on the axial wall (Group II), on the gingival floor (Group III), or on the axial wall and pulpal/gingival floor (Group IV) of the proximal cavity. All the teeth were subjected to thermocycling to simulate the oral environment. The fracture strength was measured using a universal testing machine. Group IV had the highest mean fracture strength at maximum load (148.74 MPa), followed by Group II (140.73 MPa), Group III (136.34 MPa), and Group I (130.08 MPa), with a statistically significant difference from the control group (p = 0.008) but not between groups II and III. Full article

With the increased incidence of traumatic injuries and the advanced understanding of the periodontal and alveolar healing process, teeth splinting has become a common practice for stabilizing traumatized teeth. Consequently, several splinting materials and techniques have been introduced in the past few years. Despite the detrimental role of bacterial biofilm on healing, the level of biofilm development on these material surfaces has not been well investigated. Bacterial biofilms are severely detrimental for periodontal healing of avulsed and luxated teeth. Thus, biofilm growth becomes a critical factor in selecting the material of choice for dental splints. In this study, we aim to assess the level of oral biofilm growth on four different splinting systems: Ribbond©, orthodontic NiTi wire, monofilament fishing line, and Titanium Trauma Splint. A total of 72 extracted anterior teeth were divided into four groups. We splinted six rows of three teeth each per group. The teeth selected were caries-free and periodontitis-free at the time of extraction. To assess biofilm growth, a supragingival dental plaque sample was cultured and directly inoculated into all groups. After 7 days, bacterial growth was quantified by live/dead fluorescent microscopy assay and colony forming unit counts (CFU). Using one-way ANOVA and Bonferroni’s post hoc tests, we demonstrated that all splint systems allowed for bacterial growth. However, the Titanium Trauma Splint (TTS) allowed for the least amount of biofilm growth compared to other splint systems. Full article

Splinting of the mobile teeth is a critical part of periodontal management to improve the prognosis and longevity of stable results of periodontally compromised teeth with increased mobility. Different types of splints are used in the dental field based on their mechanical and physical properties.The objective of the current in vitro study was to evaluate the flexure strength and flexural modulus of different types of splinting materials, such as: composite block, ligature wire, Ribbond^®, InFibra^®, and F-splint-Aid^® bonded utilizing Flowable composites resin material. Seventy-five bar specimens were prepared with the dimensions of 25 × 4 × 2 mm, utilizing split metallic mold. Specimens were divided equally (n = 15) into five groups (one control group, four test groups). Different layers of splinting material were placed in between the layers of composite before curing. All the specimens were subjected to a three-point bending test by using a universal testing machine to calculate the flexural strength and flexural modulus. The entire data was subjected to statistical tests to evaluate the significance. Specimens from composite block groups showed the least mean value for flexural strength (89.15 ± 9.70 MPa) and flexural modulus (4.310 ± 0.912 GPa). Whereas, the highest mean value for flexural strength (168.04 ± 45.95 MPa) and flexural modulus (5.861 ± 0.501 GPa) were recorded by Ribbond^® specimens. Inter group comparison of flexural strength showed statistically significant differences (P-value < 0.05), whereas comparison of flexural modulus showed non-significant difference among the groups (P-value > 0.05). Within the limitation of the present study, it was concluded that the Ribbond^® exhibits maximum flexural strength and flexural modulus, whereas the composite blocks recorded the least values. Still, the decision making depends on the clinical scenario and the unique characteristic of each splint material. Full article