Search Results (94)

Pulmonary large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is a rare lung malignancy characterized by an aggressive clinical course and an unfavorable prognosis. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has revealed that LCNECs exhibit molecular features resembling either small-cell lung carcinoma (SCLC-like LCNEC) or non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC-like LCNEC). This study aimed to characterize the incidence of actionable gene variants in a retrospective cohort of LCNEC patients using a targeted NGS approach. Microscopic diagnosis was established according to the 2021 World Health Organization (WHO) classification using a standard immunohistochemical (IHC) panel. In total, 216 LCNEC tumor samples were analyzed for molecular variants in 17 genes using the RNA-based Archer FusionPlex Lung NGS assay (Integrated DNA Technologies, USA) and the MiSeq platform (Illumina, USA)—an algorithm utilized for routine NSCLC diagnosis. Overall, 46 variants were identified in 46/216 (21.3%) tumor samples, with 28/216 (13%) LCNECs harboring at least one actionable molecular variant potentially targetable by registered or investigational agents. KRAS variants (5%; including G12C at 2%) and PIK3CA variants (5%) were the most prevalent, followed by RET single-nucleotide variants (3%), uncommon EGFR variants (1%), and BRAF class II and III variants (<1%). Notably, no classical EGFR exon 18–21 mutations nor ALK, FGFR1/2/3, or ROS1 alterations (mutations or fusions) were detected, despite the technical capability of the assay to identify such variants. A novel in-frame gene fusion (TMEM79::NTRK1) was identified in a single tumor sample (0.5%). Our results confirm that LCNECs harbor potentially targetable alterations in KRAS, PIK3CA, RET, BRAF, and NTRK1, albeit at lower frequencies than those typically observed in NSCLC. Full article

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has impacted the treatment landscape for mCRC, leading to improved outcomes through the use of molecularly targeted and immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) recommend, at a minimum, initial testing to assess RAS, BRAF, HER2, and microsatellite instability (MSI)/mismatch repair (MMR) status, as these results determine therapeutic eligibility. Broader testing to identify the eligibility for tumor-agnostic therapy for a tumor mutation burden (TMB), NTRK gene fusions, and RET fusions is encouraged for all patients with advanced solid tumors. Patients with metastatic disease may develop progressive disease, often as a result of adaptive resistance mechanisms and selective therapeutic pressure on disease heterogeneity. Repeat biomarker testing at progression has the potential to define these resistance mechanisms and to guide the next therapy or clinical trial enrollment. While these practices have become more commonplace, unified guidelines have yet to be established. In this review of the literature, we evaluate the advantages and pitfalls of sequential biomarker testing during disease progression in patients with mCRC. Full article

Background/Objectives: Tissue-agnostic therapy has transformed oncology by enabling treatment selection based on molecular alterations rather than tumor origin. Since 2017, nine U.S. Food and Drug Administration approvals across six biomarker classes have defined this paradigm. Thoracic and head and neck (H&N) cancers have been underrepresented in the registrational evidence supporting these approvals. This review systematically evaluated biomarker representation, histologic distribution, and clinical applicability of tissue-agnostic therapies in thoracic and H&N malignancies. Methods: A narrative systematic review was conducted using PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and regulatory documents for all tissue-agnostic approvals between January 2017 and October 2025. Data were extracted from pivotal trials, including total enrollment, objective response rate (ORR), histologic distribution, and thoracic/H&N representation. Emerging biomarkers and resistance mechanisms were assessed from phase I–III studies and basket trials. Results: Nine tissue-agnostic approvals encompassing six biomarkers were identified: MSI-H/dMMR, TMB-High, NTRK, RET, BRAF V600E, and HER2 (IHC 3+). Across pivotal datasets (3800 patients), thoracic and H&N cancers accounted for fewer than 8% (n = 290) of enrolled patients. Thoracic representation was dominated by non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in RET, NTRK, and HER2 programs (150 patients, 4%), while small-cell lung, mesothelioma, and thymic carcinomas contributed <1% combined. H&N cancers comprised 140 patients (3–4%), primarily secretory salivary carcinoma in NTRK trials (n = 12–20), thyroid carcinoma in BRAF (n = 36) and RET (n = 45) programs, and rare HER2-positive salivary duct carcinomas. Conventional HNSCC and sinonasal cancers were limited to 1–2 cases per trial. Only two of nine trials (22%) reported prespecified CNS endpoints, and RNA-based fusion testing was employed in <40%, underscoring diagnostic variability and limited applicability. Conclusions: Although tissue-agnostic therapy has expanded the reach of precision oncology, thoracic and H&N cancers remain underrepresented in registrational evidence. Most approvals rely on single-arm basket studies with small, heterogeneous subsets that preclude histology-specific conclusions. Future research should prioritize histology-enriched trial designs, standardized molecular diagnostics, and real-world validation to establish reliable, equitable standards of care for these underrepresented malignancies. Full article

Background and Clinical Significance: Non-bacterial thrombotic endocarditis (NBTE), historically termed marantic endocarditis, is a severe manifestation of cancer-associated hypercoagulability characterized by sterile valvular vegetations and a high risk of systemic embolization. While direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have become the standard of care for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (CAT), their efficacy in preventing high-shear arterial thrombosis in NBTE has been contested. Emerging data suggest that DOACs may fail to halt vegetation growth in active malignancy, necessitating a reversion to heparin-based therapies. Case Presentation: A 47-year-old female with metastatic RET fusion-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) presented with progressive dyspnea and digital ischemia despite strict adherence to therapeutic anticoagulation with rivaroxaban for a prior pulmonary embolism. Echocardiography showed large vegetations on all three cusps of the aortic valve, confirming NBTE. Computed tomography revealed extensive tumor progression. The therapeutic strategy involved an immediate switch from rivaroxaban to therapeutic low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) and the initiation of dual targeted therapy with selpercatinib and tepotinib. Serial transesophageal echocardiography documented regression within two weeks and eventual complete resolution of the valvular vegetations after eight weeks, occurring in tandem with a rapid radiological response of the tumor. Conclusions: Upon diagnosis of NBTE, a rapid oncologic work-up is warranted, as ongoing tumor progression is highly likely. This case questions the appropriateness of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with NBTE and active, progressive malignancy. Full article

Ampullary carcinoma (AC) is a rare gastrointestinal malignancy with dual intestinal and pancreatobiliary differentiation, complicating diagnosis, staging, and treatment. This review synthesizes current epidemiology, pathology, and multi-omic data to outline a pragmatic care pathway: lineage-first at presentation, mutation-fast at progression. Histology remains the primary classifier: the intestinal subtype generally aligns with colorectal regimens, whereas pancreatobiliary and mixed subtypes favor pancreaticobiliary therapy. In selected fit patients, modified FOLFIRINOX may address mixed phenotypes. Next-generation sequencing adds precision by identifying therapeutically relevant alterations, including ERBB2/HER2 amplifications, MSI-high/dMMR, BRAF V600E, and rare NTRK or RET fusions, while KRAS mutations are enriched in pancreatobiliary tumors. We recommend early application of a rapid-core panel (KRAS/BRAF, MSI/dMMR, ERBB2/HER2, RNA-based fusions) to capture high-impact targets, followed by comprehensive profiling at first progression. Liquid biopsy, plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), or bile-derived DNA may complement tissue and help identify the dominant lineage. Research priorities include ampulla-enriched umbrella trials, explicit AC subcohorts in tissue-agnostic studies, and ctDNA-informed endpoints. This lineage-first, mutation-fast paradigm supports precision care and evidence generation in AC. Full article

Over the past several decades, rapid advances in molecular genomics have transformed our understanding of thyroid malignancies and are increasingly integrated into international clinical guidelines. Mutational profiles and epigenetic events are now recognized not only as diagnostic and prognostic tools but also as predictors of therapeutic response. Papillary, follicular, oncocytic, medullary, and anaplastic thyroid carcinomas harbor distinct early driver mutations, such as BRAFV600E, RAS, and fusion events (RET, NTRK, and ALK), that cooperate with secondary alterations (TERT promoter, TP53, PIK3CA, and CDKN2A/B loss) to drive dedifferentiation, metastasis, and therapeutic resistance. Insights from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and transcriptomic scoring systems (e.g., BRAF–RAS score) now link genotype to tumor morphology, metastatic tropism, and radioactive iodine refractoriness. These molecular insights have been incorporated into updated risk stratification frameworks, preoperative surgical planning, and treatment algorithms, informing the selection of kinase inhibitors, redifferentiation strategies, and enrollment in genotype-directed clinical trials for radioiodine-refractory disease. This review synthesizes recent evidence connecting genomic alterations to clinical behavior and highlights their translation into evolving approaches for thyroid cancer management. Full article

Background/Objectives: The RET (Rearranged during Transfection) gene encodes a receptor tyrosine kinase. RET plays a critical role in embryonic development and postnatal physiology. This review provides a comprehensive overview of RET-associated disorders, focusing on the molecular mechanisms of RET activation, associated clinical phenotypes and therapeutic implications. In addition, we present an updated RET mutation database. Methods: RET mutation database is built through the integration and curation of data from two major RET mutation repositories: the Leiden Open Variation Database (LOVD) and the Cancer Knowledge Base (CKB) as well as information derived from the ClinVar database. Results: To date, 78 pathogenic RET mutations have been identified, among these, 71 (91.0%) are single nucleotide substitutions (missense variants), 2 (2.6%) are deletions, 1 (1.3%) are indels, 2 (2.6%) are nonsense mutations and 1 (1.3%) mutation affecting the introns. A pronounced clustering was observed in exons 10–11, accounting for ~60% of cases, suggesting a potential mutational hotspot with structural or functional relevance. Conclusions: Aberrant RET activation, resulting from activating missense variants, gene fusions, or overexpression, underlies a wide spectrum of human diseases. These include multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2A (MEN2A), medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC), Hirschsprung disease, and pheochromocytoma. The existence and use of a database classifying variants in the RET gene plays a fundamental role in molecular diagnostics and personalized medicine. Full article

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly lethal malignancy with a five-year survival rate of 3–15% and limited effective treatment options for most patients. Approximately 5–10% of cases are wild-type KRAS and are more likely to harbor rare alterations, including gene fusions involving anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), ROS Proto-Oncogene 1 (ROS1), neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK), Rearranged During Transfection (RET), Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor (FGFR), or Neuregulin 1 (NRG1) genes, as well as germline mutations in DNA repair genes. This review integrates current evidence on the prevalence, molecular profile, and clinical significance of gene fusions, amplification, and somatic/germline mutations in PDAC, with a particular focus on the wild-type KRAS subgroup. Clinical trial data and case reports indicate that these alterations can enhance patient susceptibility to targeted therapies. Currently, selpercatinib, larotrectinib, and repotrectinib are approved by the FDA for the treatment of certain solid tumors harboring specific gene fusions. Recent studies on zenocutuzumab resulted in the FDA-accelerated approval for NGR1 fusion-positive NSCLC and PDAC. Germline mutations may specifically increase responsiveness to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors or platinum-based treatments. Comprehensive genomic profiling, incorporating fusion detection and germline testing, is essential to identify patients who may benefit from precision-based approaches. Full article

Accurate detection of oncogenic gene fusions is becoming increasingly important given the availability of highly effective targeted therapies. However, their identification in clinical practice remains challenging due to the rarity of individual events, diversity of partner genes, and variability of breakpoint locations. Conventional approaches such as immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) lack multiplexing capacity and demonstrate variable sensitivity and specificity, while direct identification of fusion transcripts in whole-transcriptome sequencing (RNA-seq) profiles provides broader applicability but limited sensitivity, as fusion junctions are frequently supported by a minimal number of reads or even no reads at all. In this study, a novel approach was employed to accurately detect clinically actionable RET (REarranged during Transfection) fusions. This approach entailed the measurement of the imbalance in RNA-seq read coverage of potential fusion oncogenes at their 3′ and 5′ exons. A total of 1327 experimental solid tumor RNA-seq profiles were screened, including 154 non-small cell lung cancer and 221 thyroid cancer samples. The RET status was validated in 78 selected cases by targeted NGS and Sanger sequencing. An analysis of the coverage imbalance was conducted, which enabled the accurate discrimination between true and false positive RET fusions. This approach outperformed other methods and yielded 100% sensitivity and specificity with optimized thresholds. The findings were validated using an independent cohort of 79 thyroid cancer cases, confirming the reliability of the results. Among the 18 RET fusion-positive samples, one was identified as an extremely rare case (RUFY3::RET), and two were determined to be novel fusions (FN1::RET, PPP1R21::RET). The findings of this study demonstrate that exon coverage imbalance analysis serves as a robust complement to computational RNA-seq analysis pipelines for the detection of clinically relevant RET fusions. Full article

Background/Objectives: Lung cancer remains among the most frequently diagnosed malignancies in Romania, with a high mortality rate. Beyond EGFR mutations, clinically relevant genetic alterations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) include fusions involving ALK, ROS1, RET, and NTRK1/2/3. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of these mutations in a Romanian cohort and evaluate their associations with clinicopathological features. Methods: DNA and RNA were simultaneously extracted from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue sections using the Genexus Purification System (ThermoFisher Scientific). Concentrations were quantified fluorometrically, and gene fusions were analyzed with Ion Torrent NGS (Ion GeneStudio S5) with the Oncomine Focus Assay (ThermoFisher Scientific). Library preparation was automated with the Ion Chef System, and data interpretation was conducted using Ion Reporter. Results: Among 721 newly diagnosed NSCLC patients, 28 (3.88%) harbored gene fusions. Adenocarcinoma prevailed among fusion-positive cases (85.7%). The subgroup included 15 males and 13 females, with a mean age of 63.25 years (range 43–83). ALK fusions were most frequent (1.66% of the cohort; 42.86% of positives), predominantly EML4::ALK. ROS1 fusions were detected in five patients (0.7%), most frequently CD74::ROS1. RET fusions occurred in 1.11%. Rare fusions included one ETV6::NTRK3, one PTPRZ1::MET, and one FGFR3::TACC3 co-occurring with EGFR L858R. Conclusions: Gene fusions were present in a minority of NSCLC cases, with ALK, ROS1, and RET being the most clinically relevant. These alterations were mutually exclusive with common drivers such as EGFR or KRAS. Detection of rare fusions highlights the therapeutic potential of comprehensive NGS profiling in Romanian NSCLC patients. Full article

Precision oncology is witnessing an increasing number of molecular targets fueled by the continuous improvement of cancer genomics and drug development. Tumor genomic profiling is nowadays (August 2025) part of routine cancer patient care, guiding therapeutic decisions day by day. Nevertheless, implementing and distilling the increasing number of potential gene targets and possible precision drugs into therapeutically relevant actions is a challenge. The availability of prescreening programs for clinical trials has expanded the description of the genomic landscape of gastrointestinal tumors. The selection of the genomic test to use in each clinical situation, the correct interpretation of the results, and ensuring clinically meaningful implications in the context of diverse geographical drug accessibility, economic cost, and access to clinical trials are daily challenges of personalized medicine. In this context, well-established negative predictive biomarkers, such as extended RAS extended mutations for anti-EGFR therapy in colorectal cancer, and positive predictive biomarkers, such as MSI status, BRAF p.V600E hotspot mutation, ERBB2 amplification, or even NTRK1, NTRK2, NTRK3, RET, and NRG1 fusions across gastrointestinal cancers, are mandatory to provide tailored clinical care, improve patient selection for treatment and clinical trials, maximize therapeutic benefit, and minimize unnecessary toxicity. In this review, we provide an updated overview of actionable genomic alterations in GI cancers and discuss their implications for clinical decision making. Full article

Background: Blood-based comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP), a form of liquid biopsy, is often used for biliary tract cancer (BTC) when tissue-based CGP (tissue CGP) is unavailable, despite lower detection rates. This study explored factors linked to detecting actionable genomic alterations to optimize its use. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed BTC cases in Japan’s C-CAT (June 2019–January 2025), restricting panel comparisons to FoundationOne^® CDx (F1; n = 5019) and FoundationOne^® Liquid CDx (F1L; n = 1550). Missing covariates were handled by multiple imputations (m = 20). Between-panel balance used 1:1 propensity-score matching (caliper 0.2). Outcomes were modeled with logistic regression. Targets included MSI-H, TMB-H, FGFR2/RET/NTRK fusions, BRAF V600E, KRAS G12C, IDH1 mutations, and ERBB2 amplification. An exploratory analysis stratified results by the number of prespecified enrichment factors (0–4). Liquid biopsy was performed using plasma-based comprehensive genomic profiling assays (FoundationOne^® Liquid). Results: Missingness was low; after matching (n = 1549 per group) covariates were well balanced (all|SMD|≤0.05). Detection of any actionable alteration was lower with F1L than F1 (16.8% vs. 24.8%; OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.49–0.75; p < 0.001). F1L also had lower TMB-H (OR 0.62, 0.43–0.90; p = 0.01) and ERBB2 amplification (OR 0.42, 0.31–0.57; p < 0.001), with no significant differences for MSI-H, IDH1, KRAS G12C, or BRAF V600E. Within F1L, non-perihilar location (OR 2.05), liver (1.90), lymph-node (1.41), and lung metastases (1.52) predicted detection of actionable genomic alterations. F1L detection increased from 5.8% (zero factors) to 32.8% (four factors), approximating tissue at three factors. Conclusions: The utility of liquid biopsy can be maximized by carefully selecting samples on the basis of conditions that increase the detection rate. Full article

Background/Objectives: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains one of the deadliest solid tumors, with a five-year overall survival rate below 10%. While the introduction of multi-agent chemotherapy regimens has improved outcomes marginally, most patients with advanced disease continue to have limited therapeutic options. Molecular profiling has uncovered actionable genomic alterations in select subgroups of PDAC, yet the clinical impact of targeted therapies remains modest. This review aims to provide a clinically oriented synthesis of emerging molecular targets in PDAC, their therapeutic relevance, and practical considerations for biomarker testing, including current FDA and EMA indications. Methods: A narrative review was conducted using data from PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and international guidelines (NCCN, ESMO, ASCO). The selection focused on evidence published between 2020 and 2025, highlighting molecularly defined PDAC subsets and the current status of targeted therapies. Results: Actionable genomic alterations in PDAC include KRAS G12C mutations, BRCA1/2 and PALB2-associated homologous recombination deficiency, MSI-H/dMMR status, and rare gene fusions involving NTRK, RET, and NRG1. While only a minority of patients are eligible for targeted treatments, early-phase trials and real-world data have shown promising results in these subgroups. Testing molecular profiling is increasingly standard in advanced PDAC. Conclusions: Despite the rarity of targetable mutations, systematic molecular profiling is critical in advanced PDAC to guide off-label therapy or clinical trial enrollment. A practical framework for identifying and acting on molecular targets is essential to bridge the gap between precision oncology and clinical management. Full article

Some pancreatic ductal-type (PDADK) and lung adenocarcinomas (LADK) lacking other molecular drivers are reported to harbor NRG1 fusions as potential novel therapeutic targets. We investigated the feasibility of a fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH)-based diagnosis of NRG1 fusions in a case series of PDADK and LADK lacking other identified oncogenic drivers. First, among a case series of PDADK, KRAS analyses (PCR followed in PCR-negative cases by RNA sequencing—RNAseq) found 27/162 (16.7%) KRAS wild-type cases, among which 1/162 (0.6%) NRG1 fusion was diagnosed using FISH. Secondly, among a case series of LDAK, 191/446 (42.8%) cases had no molecular alterations in EGFR, KRAS, BRAF, HER2, MET, ALK, ROS1 and RET according to NGS and FISH analyses and, among them, 4/446 (0.9%) cases had NRG1 fusions using FISH. Finally, four additional cases out of the two previously mentioned cases series (1 PDADK and 3 LADK) with NRG1 fusions diagnosed by first-line RNAseq were also concluded as NRG1 FISH-positive. The NRG1 FISH tests for the nine NRG1 FISH-positive cases resulted in 50% to 80% of positive tumor nuclei, all with single 3′-NRG1 FISH signals. In our series, of the 22 cases analyzed with both NRG1 FISH (positivity criterion of at least 15% of tumor nuclei with a split between the 5′- and the 3′- parts of the probes and/or isolated single 3′-NRG1 signal) and RNAseq, 17 cases were FISH– RNAseq– and 5 cases were FISH+ RNAseq+ (no FISH+ RNAseq– or FISH– RNAseq+ cases in our study) resulting in 100% sensibility and specificity for the NRG1 FISH test. In the case of no access to RNAseq, NRG1 FISH consists of a valuable tool searching for NRG1 fusions in patients with advanced cancers. Full article

Background/Objectives: The neurotrophic tropomyosin receptor kinase (NTRK) genes NTRK1, NTRK2, and NTRK3 encode tyrosine kinase receptors, and their fusion genes are known as the oncogenic driver genes for cancer. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic ability of NTRK fusion among five types of multi-cancer genome profiling tests (multi-CGP tests) and determine a useful multi-CGP test for NTRK fusion, recorded in the Center for Cancer Genomics and Advanced Therapeutics (C-CAT) database in Japan. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic results for NTRK fusions among the five different CGP tests. Methods: A total of 88,688 tumor cases were enrolled in the C-CAT profiling database from 2019 to 2024. The detection frequency of NTRK fusion genes was compared to the results for five multi-CGP tests: NCC Oncopanel, FoundationOne CDx (F1), FoundationOne Liquid (F1L), GenMineTOP (GMT), and Guardant360. Results: NTRK fusion genes were detected in 175 (0.20%) of the 88,688 total cases. GMT, which is equipped with RNA sequencing function, frequently detected NTRK fusion genes (20 of 2926 cases; 0.68%) in comparison with the other four multi-CGP tests that do not have RNA sequencing analysis. GMT showed significantly (p < 0.05) higher diagnostic ability for NTRK fusions compared with the other four multi-CGP tests. Especially, NTRK2 fusion was significantly (p < 0.001) more highly determined by GMT than it was by the other four multi-CGP tests. The detection rates for FGFR1 and FGFR3 were significantly higher in GMT than in other multi-CGP tests. In contrast, the detection rates of the ALK and RET fusion genes were significantly higher in F1L. Conclusions: GMT, which is equipped with RNA sequencing analysis, might show a useful diagnostic ability for NTRK fusions, especially for NTRK2 fusion genes. Full article