Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (5)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = Nash–Harsanyi bargaining

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
21 pages, 983 KB  
Article
Energy Trading Strategies for Integrated Energy Systems Considering Uncertainty
by Jin Gao, Zhenguo Shao, Feixiong Chen and Mohammadreza Lak
Energies 2025, 18(4), 935; https://doi.org/10.3390/en18040935 - 15 Feb 2025
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 1441
Abstract
To improve the stable operation and promote the energy sharing of the integrated energy system (IES), a comprehensive energy trading strategy considering uncertainty is proposed. Firstly, an IES model incorporating power-to-gas (P2G) and a carbon capture system (CCS) is established to reduce carbon [...] Read more.
To improve the stable operation and promote the energy sharing of the integrated energy system (IES), a comprehensive energy trading strategy considering uncertainty is proposed. Firstly, an IES model incorporating power-to-gas (P2G) and a carbon capture system (CCS) is established to reduce carbon emissions. Secondly, this model is integrated into a four-level robust optimization to address the fluctuation of renewable energy sources in IES operations. This not only considers probability distribution scenarios of renewable energy and the uncertainty of its output, but also effectively reduces the model’s conservatism by constructing a multi-interval uncertainty set. On this basis, a Nash–Harsanyi bargaining method is used to solve the issue of benefit allocation among multiple IESs. Finally, the energy trading model is solved using a distributed algorithm that ensures an equitable distribution of benefits while protecting the privacy of each IES. The simulation results validate the effectiveness of the proposed strategy. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 914 KB  
Article
Bargaining Power in Cooperative Resource Allocations Games
by Kaveh Madani, Faraz Farhidi and Sona Gholizadeh
Algorithms 2022, 15(12), 445; https://doi.org/10.3390/a15120445 - 25 Nov 2022
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 3733
Abstract
Cooperative game theory provides an appropriate framework to assess the likelihood of conflict resolution, encourage cooperation among parties, and determine each party’s share in resource sharing conflicts. In calculating the fair and efficient allocation of the incremental benefits of cooperation, cooperative game theory [...] Read more.
Cooperative game theory provides an appropriate framework to assess the likelihood of conflict resolution, encourage cooperation among parties, and determine each party’s share in resource sharing conflicts. In calculating the fair and efficient allocation of the incremental benefits of cooperation, cooperative game theory methods often do not consider the exogenous bargaining powers of the players based on factors, that are external to the game, such as their political, economic, and military powers. This study reformulates three well-known cooperative game theory methods, namely, Nash-Harsanyi, Shapley, and Nucleolus, to account for the exogenous bargaining powers of the players in cooperative games. Using the Caspian Sea international conflict as an example, this paper shows how the negotiators’ exogenous bargaining power can change the outcome of resource sharing games. The proposed weighted cooperative game theory approach can help determine practical resolutions for real-world conflicts in which the exogenous powers of players can have a significant influence on the outcome of negotiations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Algorithmic Game Theory and Graph Mining)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 6922 KB  
Article
Optimal Multi-Sectoral Water Resources Allocation Based on Economic Evaluation Considering the Environmental Flow Requirements: A Case Study of Yellow River Basin
by Cheng-Yao Zhang and Taikan Oki
Water 2021, 13(16), 2253; https://doi.org/10.3390/w13162253 - 18 Aug 2021
Cited by 15 | Viewed by 4836
Abstract
Competitions and disputes between various human water sectors and environmental flow of the river are exacerbated due to the rapid growth of the economy in Yellow River basin as well as the limited supply of available water resources in recent decades. It is [...] Read more.
Competitions and disputes between various human water sectors and environmental flow of the river are exacerbated due to the rapid growth of the economy in Yellow River basin as well as the limited supply of available water resources in recent decades. It is necessary to implement rational and effective management and allocation to alleviate the pressure of water shortage. In order to promote economic development and maintain the ecological balance of the river, both the water allocation to the river environmental system and different human needs should be of concern when making the allocation polices. This study developed a water allocation model based on Nash–Harsanyi bargaining game theory for optimal water resources allocation among agricultural, industrial, domestic, public, and urban ecological water (watering for urban green space) sectors while ensuring the environmental flow requirements of lower reaches. A comprehensive economic evaluation framework is built to assess the economic benefits of different water uses that were taken as the basis of water allocation model. The annual environmental base flow is 7.50 billion m3 in the lower reaches of Yellow River. Moreover, the optimal annual allocations for agricultural, industrial, domestic, public, and urban ecological water use sectors are estimated as 33.7, 6.42, 3.96, 1.75 and 2.68 billion m3, respectively. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Water Policy Collection)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 4365 KB  
Article
Qualifying Coordination Mechanism for Cascade-Reservoir Operation with a New Game-Theoretical Methodology
by Yuni Xu, Xiang Fu and Jianan Qin
Water 2018, 10(12), 1857; https://doi.org/10.3390/w10121857 - 14 Dec 2018
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 4020
Abstract
The coordinated operation for hydropower generation in cascade reservoirs is critical to resolve the conflicts in hydropower needs between upstream and downstream reservoirs. Due to the individual rationality and collective rationality highlighted by game theory, we propose an integrated game-theoretical model to simulate [...] Read more.
The coordinated operation for hydropower generation in cascade reservoirs is critical to resolve the conflicts in hydropower needs between upstream and downstream reservoirs. Due to the individual rationality and collective rationality highlighted by game theory, we propose an integrated game-theoretical model to simulate the coordination behaviors among cascade reservoirs for hydropower generation. In the case study of a cascade-reservoir system in the Yangtze River of China, three operation models are compared and analyzed: the non-cooperative model, centralized model, and integrated game-theoretical model. The factors influencing the coordination efficiency of the integrated game-theoretical model are also explored in this study. The results indicate that the system’s hydropower generation obtained by the integrated game-theoretical model is closer to the ideal solution obtained by the centralized model compared to that obtained by the non-cooperative model. Moreover, individual hydropower generation in non-cooperation (rational individual gains) is guaranteed by the integrated game-theoretical model, which is neglected by the centralized model. Furthermore, the coordination efficiency of the integrated game-theoretical model is influenced by the water availability variation and regulation capacities of cascade reservoirs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Economics of Water Resources Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 1618 KB  
Article
Water Resources Allocation in Transboundary River Based on Asymmetric Nash–Harsanyi Leader–Follower Game Model
by Jisi Fu, Ping-An Zhong, Feilin Zhu, Juan Chen, Ye-nan Wu and Bin Xu
Water 2018, 10(3), 270; https://doi.org/10.3390/w10030270 - 4 Mar 2018
Cited by 43 | Viewed by 6032
Abstract
Transboundary river water resources allocation is important in water resources management. Conflicts often arise when different water users compete for a limited water supply. This study proposes a two-level asymmetric Nash–Harsanyi Leader–Follower game model to resolve conflicts of interest in transboundary river water [...] Read more.
Transboundary river water resources allocation is important in water resources management. Conflicts often arise when different water users compete for a limited water supply. This study proposes a two-level asymmetric Nash–Harsanyi Leader–Follower game model to resolve conflicts of interest in transboundary river water resources allocation problems. In the proposed model, we use bankruptcy theory to derive disagreement points and determine the bargaining weights considering the principles of equity and efficiency. For comparison, a model that does not consider disagreement points and bargaining weights are also used to demonstrate the importance of disagreement points and bargaining weights. The proposed model is applied to a real case of the Huaihe River basin in China, which is facing water shortages. In the case study, the watershed management agency serves as the leader, three provinces (Henan, Anhui and Jiangsu) serve as followers, and successive linear programming is used to solve the model for followers. The results show that the proposed disagreement points can guarantee basic water demand, and the bargaining weights can better balance the economic development levels among followers. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop