Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (4)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = Mother’s Day superstorm

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
27 pages, 13774 KB  
Article
Subauroral and Auroral Conditions in the Mid- and Low-Midlatitude Ionosphere over Europe During the May 2024 Mother’s Day Superstorm
by Kitti Alexandra Berényi, Veronika Barta, Csilla Szárnya, Attila Buzás and Balázs Heilig
Remote Sens. 2025, 17(14), 2492; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17142492 - 17 Jul 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1247
Abstract
This study focuses on the mid- and low-midlatitude ionospheric response to the 2024 Mother’s Day superstorm, utilizing ground-based and Swarm satellite observations. The ground-based ionosonde measured F1, F2-layer, B0 and B1 parameters, as well as isodensity data, were used. The ionospheric absorption was [...] Read more.
This study focuses on the mid- and low-midlatitude ionospheric response to the 2024 Mother’s Day superstorm, utilizing ground-based and Swarm satellite observations. The ground-based ionosonde measured F1, F2-layer, B0 and B1 parameters, as well as isodensity data, were used. The ionospheric absorption was investigated with the so-called amplitude method, which is based on ionosonde data. Auroral sporadic E-layer was the first time ever recorded at Sopron. Moreover, the auroral F-layer appeared at exceptionally low latitude (35° mlat, over San Vito) during the storm main phase. These unprecedented detections were confirmed by optical all-sky cameras. The observations revealed that these events were linked to the extreme equatorward shift of the auroral oval along with the midlatitude trough. As a result, the midlatitude ionosphere became confined to the trough itself. Three stages of F2-layer uplift were identified during the night of 10/11 May, each caused by different mechanisms: most probably by the effect of prompt penetration electric fields (PPEFs) (1), the travelling ionospheric disturbances (TIDs) (2) and the combination of electrodynamic processes and decreased O/N2 ratio (3). After a short interval of G-condition, an unprecedented extended disappearance of the layers was observed during daytime hours on 11 May, which was further confirmed by Swarm data. This phenomenon appeared to be associated with a reduced O/N2 along with the influence of disturbance dynamo electric fields (DDEFs) and it cannot be explained only by the increased ionospheric absorption according to the results of the amplitude method. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 10436 KB  
Article
Effects of the Geomagnetic Superstorms of 10–11 May 2024 and 7–11 October 2024 on the Ionosphere and Plasmasphere
by Viviane Pierrard, Tobias G. W. Verhulst, Jean-Marie Chevalier, Nicolas Bergeot and Alexandre Winant
Atmosphere 2025, 16(3), 299; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16030299 - 4 Mar 2025
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 4215
Abstract
On 10 May 2024 at 17 h:07 UTC, the simultaneous arrival of several solar coronal mass ejections (CMEs) generated the strongest geomagnetic storm of the last twenty years, with a minimum Dst = −412 nT, usually referred to as the Mother’s Day event. [...] Read more.
On 10 May 2024 at 17 h:07 UTC, the simultaneous arrival of several solar coronal mass ejections (CMEs) generated the strongest geomagnetic storm of the last twenty years, with a minimum Dst = −412 nT, usually referred to as the Mother’s Day event. On 10 October 2024, the second strongest event of solar cycle 25 appeared with a Dst = −335 nT, preceded on 8 October by an event with a Dst = −153 nT. In the present work, with measurements of the vertical total electron content and with ionosonde observations from Europe, USA, and South Korea, we show that the ionization of the upper atmosphere shortly increased at the arrival of the CME for these different events, followed by a fast decrease at all latitudes. The ionization remained very low for more than a full day. While the recovery started at the beginning of the second day after the onset for both events in October, the sudden recovery in the middle of the second day on 12 May is much more unusual. The analysis of the observations at different latitudes and longitudes shows that the causes of the ionization variations during the superstorms were mainly due to strong perturbations in the ionospheric F layer, amplified by the plasmasphere’s influence on the vertical total electron content (VTEC). The erosion of the plasmasphere during these two strong events led to a plasmapause located at exceptionally low radial distances smaller than 2 Re (Earth’s radii) in the post-midnight sector and a rotating plume in the afternoon–dusk sector clearly visible in the BSPM plasmasphere model. It took several days after the storms to recover normal ionization rates. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ionospheric Disturbances and Space Weather)
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 48751 KB  
Article
Effects of the Mother’s Day Superstorm (10–11 May 2024) over the Global Ionosphere
by Krishnendu Sekhar Paul, Mefe Moses, Haris Haralambous and Christina Oikonomou
Remote Sens. 2025, 17(5), 859; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17050859 - 28 Feb 2025
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 2288
Abstract
The present study examines the global ionospheric response to the “Mother’s Day Superstorm” (10–11 May 2024), one of the most intense geomagnetic storms since 1957, with a minimum SYM-H index of −436 nT. Constellation Observing System for Meteorology, Ionosphere, and Climate-2 (COSMIC-2) Radio [...] Read more.
The present study examines the global ionospheric response to the “Mother’s Day Superstorm” (10–11 May 2024), one of the most intense geomagnetic storms since 1957, with a minimum SYM-H index of −436 nT. Constellation Observing System for Meteorology, Ionosphere, and Climate-2 (COSMIC-2) Radio Occultation (RO) data indicated an increase in the F2 layer maximum critical frequency (foF2) over midlatitude dayside regions, which was accompanied by a significant F-region uplift (hmF2 increase) on a global scale, even on the nightside during the main and recovery phases. At the same time, a decrease in foF2 was observed on the nightside. High southeastward and vertical drift velocities were observed in the nightside sector of the northern hemisphere with the dayside sector exhibiting upward and southwestward-to-northwestward drifts during the main and recovery phases of the storm. An intense upward drift (~170 m/s) in the southern hemisphere was registered with the poleward expansion of the Equatorial Ionization Anomaly (EIA) during the main phase. Swarm A data highlighted the EIA expansion from ~45°N to 60°S during the dayside main phase and from ~30°N to 40°S on the nightside during recovery. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Application of GNSS Remote Sensing in Ionosphere Monitoring)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

28 pages, 11667 KB  
Article
Investigation of the Ionospheric Response on Mother’s Day 2024 Geomagnetic Superstorm over the European Sector
by Krishnendu Sekhar Paul, Haris Haralambous, Mefe Moses, Christina Oikonomou, Stelios M. Potirakis, Nicolas Bergeot and Jean-Marie Chevalier
Atmosphere 2025, 16(2), 180; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16020180 - 5 Feb 2025
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 2943
Abstract
The present study examines the negative ionospheric response over Europe during two geomagnetic storms on 10–13 May 2024, known as the Mother’s Day geomagnetic superstorm. The first storm, with a peak SYM-H value of −436 nT, occurred in the interval 10–11 May, while [...] Read more.
The present study examines the negative ionospheric response over Europe during two geomagnetic storms on 10–13 May 2024, known as the Mother’s Day geomagnetic superstorm. The first storm, with a peak SYM-H value of −436 nT, occurred in the interval 10–11 May, while the second, less intense storm (SYM-H~−103 nT), followed in the interval 12–13 May. Using data from four European locations, temporal and spatial variations in ionospheric parameters (TEC, foF2, and hmF2) were analyzed to investigate the morphology of the strong negative response. Sharp electron density (Ne) depletion is associated with the equatorward displacement of the Midlatitude Ionospheric Trough (MIT), confirmed by Swarm satellite data. A key finding was the absence of foF2 and hmF2 values over all ionosonde stations during the recovery phase of the storms, likely due to the coupling between the Equatorial Ionization Anomaly (EIA) crests and the auroral ionosphere influenced by the intense uplift of the F layer. Relevant distinct features such as Large-scale Travelling Ionospheric Disturbance (LSTID) signatures and Spread F were also noted, particularly during the initial and main phase of the first storm over high midlatitude regions. Regional effects varied, with high European midlatitudes exhibiting different features compared to lower European latitude areas. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers in Upper Atmosphere (2nd Edition))
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop