Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (7)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = IWSN standards

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
22 pages, 7214 KiB  
Article
Predictive Energy-Aware Routing Solution for Industrial IoT Evaluated on a WSN Hardware Platform
by Eusebiu Jecan, Catalin Pop, Ovidiu Ratiu and Emanuel Puschita
Sensors 2022, 22(6), 2107; https://doi.org/10.3390/s22062107 - 9 Mar 2022
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 2389
Abstract
In industrial wireless sensors networks (IWSNs), the sensor lifetime predictability is critical for ensuring continuous system availability, cost efficiency and suitability for safety applications. When deployed in a real-world dynamic and centralised network, the sensor lifetime is highly dependent on the network topology, [...] Read more.
In industrial wireless sensors networks (IWSNs), the sensor lifetime predictability is critical for ensuring continuous system availability, cost efficiency and suitability for safety applications. When deployed in a real-world dynamic and centralised network, the sensor lifetime is highly dependent on the network topology, deployment configuration and application requirements. (In the absence of an energy-aware mechanism, there is no guarantee for the sensor lifetime). This research defines a conceptual model for enhancing the energy predictability and efficiency of IWSNs. A particularization of this model is the predictive energy-aware routing (PEAR) solution that assures network lifetime predictability through energy-aware routing, energy balancing and profiling. The PEAR solution considers the requirements and constraints of the industrial ISA100.11a communication standard and the VR950 IIoT Gateway hardware platform. The results demonstrate the PEAR ability to ensure predictable energy consumption for one or multiple network clusters. The PEAR solution is capable of intracluster energy balancing, reducing the overconsumption 10.4 times after 210 routing changes as well as intercluster energy balancing, increasing the cluster lifetime 2.3 times on average and up to 3.2 times, while reducing the average consumption by 23.6%. The PEAR solution validates the feasibility and effectiveness of the energy-aware conceptual indicating its suitability within IWSNs having real world applications and requirements. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Energy-Aware Networks for Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT))
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 7417 KiB  
Article
TSCH Multiflow Scheduling with QoS Guarantees: A Comparison of SDN with Common Schedulers
by Federico Orozco-Santos, Víctor Sempere-Payá, Javier Silvestre-Blanes and Teresa Albero-Albero
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(1), 119; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12010119 - 23 Dec 2021
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 3050
Abstract
Industrial Wireless Sensor Networks (IWSN) are becoming increasingly popular in production environments due to their ease of deployment, low cost and energy efficiency. However, the complexity and accuracy demanded by these environments requires that IWSN implement quality of service mechanisms that allow them [...] Read more.
Industrial Wireless Sensor Networks (IWSN) are becoming increasingly popular in production environments due to their ease of deployment, low cost and energy efficiency. However, the complexity and accuracy demanded by these environments requires that IWSN implement quality of service mechanisms that allow them to operate with high determinism. For this reason, the IEEE 802.15.4e standard incorporates the Time Slotted Channel Hopping (TSCH) protocol which reduces interference and increases the reliability of transmissions. This standard does not specify how time resources are allocated in TSCH scheduling, leading to multiple scheduling solutions. Schedulers can be classified as autonomous, distributed and centralised. The first two have prevailed over the centralised ones because they do not require high signalling, along with the advantages of ease of deployment and high performance. However, the increased QoS requirements and the diversity of traffic flows that circulate through the network in today’s Industry 4.0 environment require strict, dynamic control to guarantee parameters such as delay, packet loss and deadline, independently for each flow. That cannot always be achieved with distributed or autonomous schedulers. For this reason, it is necessary to use centralised protocols with a disruptive approach, such as Software Defined Networks (SDN). In these, not only is the control of the MAC layer centralised, but all the decisions of the nodes that make up the network are configured by the controller based on a global vision of the topology and resources, which allows optimal decisions to be made. In this work, a comparative analysis is made through simulation and a testbed of the different schedulers to demonstrate the benefits of a fully centralized approach such as SDN. The results obtained show that with SDN it is possible to simplify the management of multiple flows, without the problems of centralised schedulers. SDN maintains the Packet Delivery Ratio (PDR) levels of other distributed solutions, but in addition, it achieves greater determinism with bounded end-to-end delays and Deadline Satisfaction Ratio (DSR) at the cost of increased power consumption. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Wireless Sensor Networks)
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 3345 KiB  
Review
A Survey on the Application of WirelessHART for Industrial Process Monitoring and Control
by P. Arun Mozhi Devan, Fawnizu Azmadi Hussin, Rosdiazli Ibrahim, Kishore Bingi and Farooq Ahmad Khanday
Sensors 2021, 21(15), 4951; https://doi.org/10.3390/s21154951 - 21 Jul 2021
Cited by 52 | Viewed by 6807
Abstract
Industrialization has led to a huge demand for a network control system to monitor and control multi-loop processes with high effectiveness. Due to these advancements, new industrial wireless sensor network (IWSN) standards such as ZigBee, WirelessHART, ISA 100.11a wireless, and Wireless network for [...] Read more.
Industrialization has led to a huge demand for a network control system to monitor and control multi-loop processes with high effectiveness. Due to these advancements, new industrial wireless sensor network (IWSN) standards such as ZigBee, WirelessHART, ISA 100.11a wireless, and Wireless network for Industrial Automation-Process Automation (WIA-PA) have begun to emerge based on their wired conventional structure with additional developments. This advancement improved flexibility, scalability, needed fewer cables, reduced the network installation and commissioning time, increased productivity, and reduced maintenance costs compared to wired networks. On the other hand, using IWSNs for process control comes with the critical challenge of handling stochastic network delays, packet drop, and external noises which are capable of degrading the controller performance. Thus, this paper presents a detailed study focusing only on the adoption of WirelessHART in simulations and real-time applications for industrial process monitoring and control with its crucial challenges and design requirements. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Sensor Networks)
Show Figures

Figure 1

3 pages, 172 KiB  
Editorial
Industrial Wireless Sensor Networks: Protocols and Applications
by Seong-eun Yoo and Taehong Kim
Sensors 2020, 20(20), 5809; https://doi.org/10.3390/s20205809 - 14 Oct 2020
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 3897
Abstract
Wireless sensor networks are penetrating our daily lives, and they are starting to be deployed even in an industrial environment. The research on such industrial wireless sensor networks (IWSNs) considers more stringent requirements of robustness, reliability, and timeliness in each network layer. This [...] Read more.
Wireless sensor networks are penetrating our daily lives, and they are starting to be deployed even in an industrial environment. The research on such industrial wireless sensor networks (IWSNs) considers more stringent requirements of robustness, reliability, and timeliness in each network layer. This Special Issue presents the recent research result on industrial wireless sensor networks. Each paper in the special issue has unique contributions in the advancements of industrial wireless sensor network research and we expect each paper to promote the relevant research and the deployment of IWSNs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Industrial Wireless Sensor Networks: Protocols and Applications)
20 pages, 5229 KiB  
Article
A Measurement-Based Frame-Level Error Model for Evaluation of Industrial Wireless Sensor Networks
by Yun-Shuai Yu and Yeong-Sheng Chen
Sensors 2020, 20(14), 3978; https://doi.org/10.3390/s20143978 - 17 Jul 2020
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2886
Abstract
Industrial wireless sensor networks (IWSNs) are a key technology for smart manufacturing. To identify the performance bottlenecks in an IWSN before its real-world deployment, the IWSN must first be evaluated through simulations using an error model which accurately characterizes the wireless links in [...] Read more.
Industrial wireless sensor networks (IWSNs) are a key technology for smart manufacturing. To identify the performance bottlenecks in an IWSN before its real-world deployment, the IWSN must first be evaluated through simulations using an error model which accurately characterizes the wireless links in the industrial scenario within which it will be deployed. However, the traditional error models used in most IWSN simulators are not derived from the real traces observed in industrial environments. Accordingly, this study first measured the transmission quality of IEEE 802.15.4 in a one-day experiment in a manufacturing factory and then used the measurement records to construct a second-order Markov frame-level error model for simulating the performance of an IWSN. The proposed model was incorporated into the simulator of OpenWSN, which is an industrial WSN implementing the related IEEE and IETF standards. The simulation results showed that the proposed error model improved the accuracy of the estimated transmission reliability by up to 12% compared to the original error model. Moreover, the estimation accuracy improved with increasing burst losses. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 3839 KiB  
Article
Toward Security Enhanced Provisioning in Industrial IoT Systems
by Sungmoon Kwon, Jaehan Jeong and Taeshik Shon
Sensors 2018, 18(12), 4372; https://doi.org/10.3390/s18124372 - 10 Dec 2018
Cited by 17 | Viewed by 3619
Abstract
Through the active development of industrial internet of things (IIoT) technology, there has been a rapid increase in the number of different industrial wireless sensor networks (IWSNs). Accordingly, the security of IWSNs is also of importance, as many security problems related to IWSN [...] Read more.
Through the active development of industrial internet of things (IIoT) technology, there has been a rapid increase in the number of different industrial wireless sensor networks (IWSNs). Accordingly, the security of IWSNs is also of importance, as many security problems related to IWSN protocols have been raised and various studies have been conducted to solve these problems. However, the provisioning process is the first step in introducing a new device into the IIoT network and a starting point for IIoT security. Therefore, leakage of security information in the provisioning process makes exposure of secret keys and all subsequent security measures meaningless. In addition, using the exploited secret keys, the attacker can send false command to the node or send false data to the network manager and it can cause serious damage to industrial infrastructure depending on the IWSN. Nevertheless, a security study on the provisioning process has not been actively carried out, resulting in a provisioning process without guaranteed security. Therefore, in this paper, we analyzed security issues of the provisioning process in IWSN by researching prominent IWSN standards, including ISA 100.11a, WirelessHART, and Zigbee, and also an ISA 100.11a-certified device and provisioning process-related studies. Then, we verified the security issues of the provisioning process through testing and analyzing the provisioning process using the ISA 100.11a standard-implemented devices and ISA 100.11a-certified devices. Finally, we discuss security considerations and the direction of future research on provisioning security for IWSN in the IIoT era. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Towards an Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT))
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 1981 KiB  
Article
A Reliable Handoff Mechanism for Mobile Industrial Wireless Sensor Networks
by Jian Ma, Dong Yang, Hongke Zhang and Mikael Gidlund
Sensors 2017, 17(8), 1797; https://doi.org/10.3390/s17081797 - 4 Aug 2017
Cited by 16 | Viewed by 7556
Abstract
With the prevalence of low-power wireless devices in industrial applications, concerns about timeliness and reliability are bound to continue despite the best efforts of researchers to design Industrial Wireless Sensor Networks (IWSNs) to improve the performance of monitoring and control systems. As mobile [...] Read more.
With the prevalence of low-power wireless devices in industrial applications, concerns about timeliness and reliability are bound to continue despite the best efforts of researchers to design Industrial Wireless Sensor Networks (IWSNs) to improve the performance of monitoring and control systems. As mobile devices have a major role to play in industrial production, IWSNs should support mobility. However, research on mobile IWSNs and practical tests have been limited due to the complicated resource scheduling and rescheduling compared with traditional wireless sensor networks. This paper proposes an effective mechanism to guarantee the performance of handoff, including a mobility-aware scheme, temporary connection and quick registration. The main contribution of this paper is that the proposed mechanism is implemented not only in our testbed but in a real industrial environment. The results indicate that our mechanism not only improves the accuracy of handoff triggering, but also solves the problem of ping-pong effect during handoff. Compared with the WirelessHART standard and the RSSI-based approach, our mechanism facilitates real-time communication while being more reliable, which can help end-to-end packet delivery remain an average of 98.5% in the scenario of mobile IWSNs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Smart Industrial Wireless Sensor Networks)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop