Search Results (5)

Background: To provide effective mental health care across cultural differences, therapists must develop cultural competencies, including an awareness of and sensitivity to diverse backgrounds. In Israel, secular therapists (STs) working with ultra-orthodox (UO), also referred to as Haredi, clients face challenges due to mutual distrust and sociopolitical tensions between the communities. This study aims to assess Israeli STs’ cross-cultural competencies and attitudes toward Haredi clients, examining the association between perceptions and competencies. Methods: The data were collected from an anonymous, self-administered online survey conducted between April and November 2024 among 70 STs in Israel. The study utilized the Cross-Cultural Competence of Healthcare Professionals (CCCHP-27) scale and a self-developed questionnaire assessing STs’ attitudes toward UO clients. The statistical analysis was performed using JASP 0.18.3. Results: While STs exhibited high general cross-cultural competence, their competence in working with Haredi clients was lower and more complex. Therapists with more experience treating UO clients had more positive attitudes toward them, whereas those working in public settings demonstrated lower cultural awareness. Although STs faced cultural and ideological challenges, many expressed openness and professional growth. Notably, while 57.2% felt that working with UO clients improved their skills, only 37.2% recommended it to others. Similarly, while 52.8% enjoyed working with diverse clients, only 27.2% reported enjoying working with UO clients. A negative correlation was found between the emotions about minorities scale and two UO-related subscales, views (ρ = −0.307, p = 0.01) and awareness (ρ = −0.534, p < 0.001), suggesting that local sociopolitical factors influence attitudes toward the Haredi community. Conclusions: This study highlights a gap between STs’ general cross-cultural competencies and their attitudes toward the Haredi population. The findings underscore the need for continued professional training in culturally competent therapy, as personal interactions play a crucial role in bridging societal divides and improving therapeutic relationships. Full article

In recent decades, research on Haredi society has expanded significantly, emphasizing its distinctive characteristics in contrast with the broader Israeli social fabric. Commonly described as “separatist”, “secessionist”, “isolated”, and “an enclave”, Haredi society is often perceived as segregated from the rest of Israel’s population. However, recent studies suggest that this reclusiveness is a relatively recent development. Until the 1980s, most Haredim coexisted in mixed residential areas with secular, traditional, and national-religious populations. The employment rate among Haredi men was comparable to that of other Israelis, and secular subjects were part of the curriculum in Haredi schools. Moreover, many Haredi men served in the Israeli army and held a positive view of the state, celebrating its accomplishments. The contemporary concept of a “society of learners”, where many married men engage in yeshiva study while their wives serve as the main breadwinners, was once largely unacceptable within the community. Unlike earlier qualitative studies that documented the transformation of Haredi society, this article employs a quantitative approach to detail these changes. Through an analysis of residential patterns, education, military service, political influence, and the rise of the “society of learners”, this study provides a deeper understanding of the forces shaping contemporary Haredi society and explores potential future trajectories. Full article

As if by design, crisis reveals basic structural fault lines. In the middle of the COVID-19 crisis, non-Haredi Jews expressed surprise and even outrage about the ultra-orthodox Haredi response to the pandemic. It was not understood how large-scale violations of public health protocols comported with the legal-halakhic principle of Pikuaḥ Nefesh (saving human life). In this essay, I explore Hasidic response to COVID-19 as reported in the secular and Haredi press and in emergent social science literature about this crisis. I place Haredi response to crisis in relation to the clash between two sets of values: the value of saving human life and the value of intensive Talmud study (talmud Torah) and ritual-communal practice. In what Robert Cover called a paideic nomos, there are more important things than human life. What we see already in the Babylonian Talmud is the profound ambiguity of paideic norms vis-à-vis the larger public good. Full article

Previous studies have found an inverse association between religiosity and mortality. However, most of these studies were carried out with Christian participants. This longitudinal study aimed to determine whether a composite variable based on self-reported religious education and religious practices is associated with coronary heart disease (CHD) and all-cause mortality in 9237 Jewish men aged 40–65 years at baseline, over a 32-year follow-up. Jewish men were characterized by their degree of religiosity, from the Ultra-Orthodox (“Haredim”)—the strictest observers of the Jewish religious rules, and in descending order: religious, traditional, secular, and agnostic. Demographic and physical assessments were made in 1963 with a 32-year follow-up. The results indicate that Haredim participants, in comparison to the agnostic participants, had lower CHD mortality. Hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI)—adjusted by age, cigarette smoking, systolic blood pressure, diabetes, socioeconomic status, BMI, and cholesterol, was: [HR = 0.68 (95% CI 0.58,0.80)] for Haredim; [HR = 0.82 (95% CI 0.69,0.96)] for religious; [HR = 0.85 (95% CI 0.73–1.00)] for traditional; and [HR = 0.92 (95% CI 0.79–01.06) for secular, respectively (p for trend = 0.001). The same pattern was observed for total mortality. This study shows an association between religious practice among men and a decreased rate of CHD and total mortality. Full article

Traditional societies around the world face various challenges with the introduction of “modern” values as a result of various globalization processes occurring worldwide. In the research literature, these groups are generally referred to as a “transitional societies.” The focus of the research discourse on “a society in transition” is the social change derived from the undermining of that traditional society and the weakening of its constituent values with the acquisition of higher education and modification of traditional division of roles in the family. In the last two decades, the ultra-Orthodox society in Israel has undergone far-reaching changes that are reflected in the acquisition of higher education and the accelerated entry into the employment market. In light of these changes, this study seeks to examine how the academic ultra-Orthodox deal with this integration into a work place outside the “enclave.” Methodologically, the study is based on qualitative content analysis of four focus groups, two for men and two for women, as is customary in ultra-Orthodox society. During the group discussion, participants were asked to describe how they cope with conflicts and their general professional challenges in the workplace. The findings of the study show that both the men and the women, described themselves as adaptable and coped well, despite the social difficulties facing their community and professional challenges in the employment space. The analysis of the major themes relies on the Stress and Coping theories. Full article