Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (8)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = HEV entry

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
28 pages, 5478 KiB  
Article
Role of Rab13, Protein Kinase A, and Zonula Occludens-1 in Hepatitis E Virus Entry and Cell-to-Cell Spread: Comparative Analysis of Quasi-Enveloped and Non-Enveloped Forms
by Shigeo Nagashima, Putu Prathiwi Primadharsini, Masaharu Takahashi, Takashi Nishiyama, Kazumoto Murata and Hiroaki Okamoto
Pathogens 2024, 13(12), 1130; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13121130 - 20 Dec 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1226
Abstract
Hepatitis E virus (HEV) exists in two distinct forms: a non-enveloped form (neHEV), which is present in feces and bile, and a quasi-enveloped form (eHEV), found in circulating blood and culture supernatants. This study aimed to elucidate the roles of Ras-associated binding 13 [...] Read more.
Hepatitis E virus (HEV) exists in two distinct forms: a non-enveloped form (neHEV), which is present in feces and bile, and a quasi-enveloped form (eHEV), found in circulating blood and culture supernatants. This study aimed to elucidate the roles of Ras-associated binding 13 (Rab13) and protein kinase A (PKA) in the entry mechanisms of both eHEV and neHEV, utilizing small interfering RNA (siRNA) and chemical inhibitors. The results demonstrated that the entry of both viral forms is dependent on Rab13 and PKA. Further investigation into the involvement of tight junction (TJ) proteins revealed that the targeted knockdown of zonula occludens-1 (ZO-1) significantly impaired the entry of both eHEV and neHEV. In addition, in ZO-1 knockout (KO) cells inoculated with either viral form, HEV RNA levels in culture supernatants did not increase, even up to 16 days post-inoculation. Notably, the absence of ZO-1 did not affect the adsorption efficiency of eHEV or neHEV, nor did it influence HEV RNA replication. In cell-to-cell spread assays, ZO-1 KO cells inoculated with eHEV showed a lack of expression of HEV ORF2 and ORF3 proteins. In contrast, neHEV-infected ZO-1 KO cells showed markedly reduced ORF2 and ORF3 protein expression within virus-infected foci, compared to non-targeting knockout (NC KO) cells. These findings underscore the crucial role of ZO-1 in facilitating eHEV entry and mediating the cell-to-cell spread of neHEV in infected cells. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pathogenesis of Viral Hepatitis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 1766 KiB  
Review
Hepatitis E Virus: What More Do We Need to Know?
by Endrit Shahini, Antonella Argentiero, Alessandro Andriano, Francesco Losito, Marcello Maida, Antonio Facciorusso, Raffaele Cozzolongo and Erica Villa
Medicina 2024, 60(6), 998; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60060998 - 18 Jun 2024
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 6051
Abstract
Hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection is typically a self-limiting, acute illness that spreads through the gastrointestinal tract but replicates in the liver. However, chronic infections are possible in immunocompromised individuals. The HEV virion has two shapes: exosome-like membrane-associated quasi-enveloped virions (eHEV) found in [...] Read more.
Hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection is typically a self-limiting, acute illness that spreads through the gastrointestinal tract but replicates in the liver. However, chronic infections are possible in immunocompromised individuals. The HEV virion has two shapes: exosome-like membrane-associated quasi-enveloped virions (eHEV) found in circulating blood or in the supernatant of infected cell cultures and non-enveloped virions (“naked”) found in infected hosts’ feces and bile to mediate inter-host transmission. Although HEV is mainly spread via enteric routes, it is unclear how it penetrates the gut wall to reach the portal bloodstream. Both virion types are infectious, but they infect cells in different ways. To develop personalized treatment/prevention strategies and reduce HEV impact on public health, it is necessary to decipher the entry mechanism for both virion types using robust cell culture and animal models. The contemporary knowledge of the cell entry mechanism for these two HEV virions as possible therapeutic target candidates is summarized in this narrative review. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Viral Hepatitis Research: Updates and Challenges)
Show Figures

Figure 1

27 pages, 7004 KiB  
Article
A Recombinant Chimeric Cedar Virus-Based Surrogate Neutralization Assay Platform for Pathogenic Henipaviruses
by Moushimi Amaya, Randy Yin, Lianying Yan, Viktoriya Borisevich, Bishwo N. Adhikari, Andrew Bennett, Francisco Malagon, Regina Z. Cer, Kimberly A. Bishop-Lilly, Antony S. Dimitrov, Robert W. Cross, Thomas W. Geisbert and Christopher C. Broder
Viruses 2023, 15(5), 1077; https://doi.org/10.3390/v15051077 - 28 Apr 2023
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 3959
Abstract
The henipaviruses, Nipah virus (NiV), and Hendra virus (HeV) can cause fatal diseases in humans and animals, whereas Cedar virus is a nonpathogenic henipavirus. Here, using a recombinant Cedar virus (rCedV) reverse genetics platform, the fusion (F) and attachment (G) glycoprotein genes of [...] Read more.
The henipaviruses, Nipah virus (NiV), and Hendra virus (HeV) can cause fatal diseases in humans and animals, whereas Cedar virus is a nonpathogenic henipavirus. Here, using a recombinant Cedar virus (rCedV) reverse genetics platform, the fusion (F) and attachment (G) glycoprotein genes of rCedV were replaced with those of NiV-Bangladesh (NiV-B) or HeV, generating replication-competent chimeric viruses (rCedV-NiV-B and rCedV-HeV), both with and without green fluorescent protein (GFP) or luciferase protein genes. The rCedV chimeras induced a Type I interferon response and utilized only ephrin-B2 and ephrin-B3 as entry receptors compared to rCedV. The neutralizing potencies of well-characterized cross-reactive NiV/HeV F and G specific monoclonal antibodies against rCedV-NiV-B-GFP and rCedV-HeV-GFP highly correlated with measurements obtained using authentic NiV-B and HeV when tested in parallel by plaque reduction neutralization tests (PRNT). A rapid, high-throughput, and quantitative fluorescence reduction neutralization test (FRNT) using the GFP-encoding chimeras was established, and monoclonal antibody neutralization data derived by FRNT highly correlated with data derived by PRNT. The FRNT assay could also measure serum neutralization titers from henipavirus G glycoprotein immunized animals. These rCedV chimeras are an authentic henipavirus-based surrogate neutralization assay that is rapid, cost-effective, and can be utilized outside high containment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Viruses and Bats 2023)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 1412 KiB  
Review
Extrahepatic Replication Sites of Hepatitis E Virus (HEV)
by Kush Kumar Yadav and Scott P. Kenney
Zoonotic Dis. 2023, 3(1), 68-84; https://doi.org/10.3390/zoonoticdis3010007 - 14 Mar 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 4436
Abstract
Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is an emerging viral disease known to cause acute viral hepatitis globally. Various genotypes of HEV have been identified that produce genotype specific lesions depending on the HEV targeted population. Pregnant or immunosuppressed individuals develop significantly more severe hepatitis [...] Read more.
Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is an emerging viral disease known to cause acute viral hepatitis globally. Various genotypes of HEV have been identified that produce genotype specific lesions depending on the HEV targeted population. Pregnant or immunosuppressed individuals develop significantly more severe hepatitis E in comparison to the general population. In the last 40 years, we discovered that the tropism of HEV is not restricted to the liver, and virus replication was demonstrated in multiple organs. Out of the 10 body systems described in humans, HEV produces lesions causing a broad range of extrahepatic clinical manifestations in each of them. Affected body systems include nervous and musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, digestive, endocrine, integumentary, renal, respiratory, immune, and reproductive systems producing systemic lesions. All extrahepatic signs are caused by either direct HEV replication in these tissues, or indirectly by various immune mediated mechanisms. Extrahepatic replication features of HEV allowed it to cross the placental barrier, blood–brain barrier (BBB), and blood–testis barrier (BTB) that do not typically grant entry to viruses in general. Thus, in this review, we summarized the extrahepatic replication sites of HEV, listed the body systems where HEV invaded, and described multiple animal models including immunocompetent and immunosuppressed that were used to study the extrahepatic replication sites of HEV. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers of Zoonotic Diseases 2021–2022)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 4807 KiB  
Article
Discovery of Potential Antiviral Compounds against Hendra Virus by Targeting Its Receptor-Binding Protein (G) Using Computational Approaches
by Faisal Ahmad, Aqel Albutti, Muhammad Hamza Tariq, Ghufranud Din, Muhammad Tahir ul Qamar and Sajjad Ahmad
Molecules 2022, 27(2), 554; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27020554 - 16 Jan 2022
Cited by 17 | Viewed by 3702
Abstract
Hendra virus (HeV) belongs to the paramyxoviridae family of viruses which is associated with the respiratory distress, neurological illness, and potential fatality of the affected individuals. So far, no competitive approved therapeutic substance is available for HeV. For that reason, the current research [...] Read more.
Hendra virus (HeV) belongs to the paramyxoviridae family of viruses which is associated with the respiratory distress, neurological illness, and potential fatality of the affected individuals. So far, no competitive approved therapeutic substance is available for HeV. For that reason, the current research work was conducted to propose some novel compounds, by adopting a Computer Aided Drug Discovery approach, which could be used to combat HeV. The G attachment Glycoprotein (Ggp) of HeV was selected to achieve the primary objective of this study, as this protein makes the entry of HeV possible in the host cells. Briefly, a library of 6000 antiviral compounds was screened for potential drug-like properties, followed by the molecular docking of short-listed compounds with the Protein Data Bank (PDB) structure of Ggp. Docked complexes of top two hits, having maximum binding affinities with the active sites of Ggp, were further considered for molecular dynamic simulations of 200 ns to elucidate the results of molecular docking analysis. MD simulations and Molecular Mechanics Energies combined with the Generalized Born and Surface Area (MMGBSA) or Poisson–Boltzmann and Surface Area (MMPBSA) revealed that both docked complexes are stable in nature. Furthermore, the same methodology was used between lead compounds and HeV Ggp in complex with its functional receptor in human, Ephrin-B2. Surprisingly, no major differences were found in the results, which demonstrates that our identified compounds can also perform their action even when the Ggp is attached to the Ephrin-B2 ligand. Therefore, in light of all of these results, we strongly suggest that compounds (S)-5-(benzylcarbamoyl)-1-(2-(4-methyl-2-phenylpiperazin-1-yl)-2-oxoethyl)-6-oxo-3,6-dihydropyridin-1-ium-3-ide and 5-(cyclohexylcarbamoyl)-1-(2-((2-(3-fluorophenyl)-2-methylpropyl)amino)-2-oxoethyl)-6-oxo-3,6-dihydropyridin-1-ium-3-ide could be considered as potential therapeutic agents against HeV; however, further in vitro and in vivo experiments are required to validate this study. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Computational Methods in Drug Design and Food Chemistry II)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1535 KiB  
Review
On the Host Side of the Hepatitis E Virus Life Cycle
by Noémie Oechslin, Darius Moradpour and Jérôme Gouttenoire
Cells 2020, 9(5), 1294; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9051294 - 22 May 2020
Cited by 22 | Viewed by 6397
Abstract
Hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection is one of the most common causes of acute hepatitis in the world. HEV is an enterically transmitted positive-strand RNA virus found as a non-enveloped particle in bile as well as stool and as a quasi-enveloped particle in [...] Read more.
Hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection is one of the most common causes of acute hepatitis in the world. HEV is an enterically transmitted positive-strand RNA virus found as a non-enveloped particle in bile as well as stool and as a quasi-enveloped particle in blood. Current understanding of the molecular mechanisms and host factors involved in productive HEV infection is incomplete, but recently developed model systems have facilitated rapid progress in this area. Here, we provide an overview of the HEV life cycle with a focus on the host factors required for viral entry, RNA replication, assembly and release. Further developments of HEV model systems and novel technologies should yield a broader picture in the future. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cell Biology of Viral Infections)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 738 KiB  
Review
Hepatitis E Virus Entry
by Xin Yin and Zongdi Feng
Viruses 2019, 11(10), 883; https://doi.org/10.3390/v11100883 - 20 Sep 2019
Cited by 37 | Viewed by 9082
Abstract
Hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection is a major cause of acute hepatitis worldwide. It is transmitted enterically but replicates in the liver. Recent studies indicate that HEV exists in two forms: naked, nonenveloped virions that are shed into feces to mediate inter-host transmission, [...] Read more.
Hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection is a major cause of acute hepatitis worldwide. It is transmitted enterically but replicates in the liver. Recent studies indicate that HEV exists in two forms: naked, nonenveloped virions that are shed into feces to mediate inter-host transmission, and membrane-cloaked, quasienveloped virions that circulate in the bloodstream to mediate virus spread within a host. Both virion types are infectious, but differ in the way they infect cells. Elucidating the entry mechanism for both virion types is essential to understand HEV biology and pathogenesis, and is relevant to the development of treatments and preventions for HEV. This review summarizes the current understanding of the cell entry mechanism for these two HEV virion types. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Hepatitis E Virus)
Show Figures

Figure 1

29 pages, 2277 KiB  
Review
Henipavirus Mediated Membrane Fusion, Virus Entry and Targeted Therapeutics
by Deborah L. Steffen, Kai Xu, Dimitar B. Nikolov and Christopher C. Broder
Viruses 2012, 4(2), 280-308; https://doi.org/10.3390/v4020280 - 13 Feb 2012
Cited by 62 | Viewed by 10873
Abstract
The Paramyxoviridae genus Henipavirus is presently represented by the type species Hendra and Nipah viruses which are both recently emerged zoonotic viral pathogens responsible for repeated outbreaks associated with high morbidity and mortality in Australia, Southeast Asia, India and Bangladesh. These enveloped viruses [...] Read more.
The Paramyxoviridae genus Henipavirus is presently represented by the type species Hendra and Nipah viruses which are both recently emerged zoonotic viral pathogens responsible for repeated outbreaks associated with high morbidity and mortality in Australia, Southeast Asia, India and Bangladesh. These enveloped viruses bind and enter host target cells through the coordinated activities of their attachment (G) and class I fusion (F) envelope glycoproteins. The henipavirus G glycoprotein interacts with host cellular B class ephrins, triggering conformational alterations in G that lead to the activation of the F glycoprotein, which facilitates the membrane fusion process. Using the recently published structures of HeV-G and NiV-G and other paramyxovirus glycoproteins, we review the features of the henipavirus envelope glycoproteins that appear essential for mediating the viral fusion process, including receptor binding, G-F interaction, F activation, with an emphasis on G and the mutations that disrupt viral infectivity. Finally, recent candidate therapeutics for henipavirus-mediated disease are summarized in light of their ability to inhibit HeV and NiV entry by targeting their G and F glycoproteins. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Virus-Induced Membrane Fusion)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop