Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (15)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = Goldmann applanation tonometry

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
11 pages, 419 KiB  
Article
Comparative Evaluation of Classic Mechanical and Digital Goldmann Applanation Tonometers
by Assaf Kratz, Ronit Yagev, Avner Belkin, Mordechai Goldberg, Alon Zahavi, Ivan Goldberg and Ahed Imtirat
Diagnostics 2025, 15(14), 1813; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15141813 - 18 Jul 2025
Viewed by 319
Abstract
Objectives: The objective of this study was to evaluate the agreement and clinical interchangeability of intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained with the mechanical Haag-Streit AT900 Goldmann applanation tonometer (mGAT) and the digital Huvitz HT5000 applanation tonometer (dGAT). Methods: This retrospective comparative [...] Read more.
Objectives: The objective of this study was to evaluate the agreement and clinical interchangeability of intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained with the mechanical Haag-Streit AT900 Goldmann applanation tonometer (mGAT) and the digital Huvitz HT5000 applanation tonometer (dGAT). Methods: This retrospective comparative study included 53 eyes of 28 patients undergoing routine ophthalmologic evaluation. Each eye underwent IOP measurement using both mGAT and dGAT in a randomized sequence. Central corneal thickness (CCT) was also recorded. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used to determine correlation between paired IOP measurements. Bland–Altman plots were graphed for the analysis of differences for IOP between the instruments. Results: A total of 53 eyes of 28 patients (15 males) were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 62.6 years. The mean mGAT and dGAT measurements were 16.3 ± 6.6 mmHg (range 9–50) and 16.4 ± 6.2 mmHg (range 8.8–45.9), respectively (p = 0.53). A strong, significant positive correlation was found for paired IOP measurements by the two instruments (r = 0.98; p < 0.0001). Bland–Altman analysis revealed 95% limits of agreement from −2.5 to +2.3 mmHg, with a small but statistically significant proportional bias favoring mGAT at higher IOP levels. Additionally, 91% of paired measurements were within ±2 mmHg. CCT-related differences were statistically and clinically insignificant. Conclusions: IOP measurements obtained with mGAT and dGAT were highly correlated and clinically interchangeable for the range tested. The Huvitz HT5000 may serve as a reliable alternative to the classic Goldmann tonometer in routine clinical settings. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Clinical Diagnosis and Prognosis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 536 KiB  
Article
Impact of Oral Citicoline, Antioxidant Vitamins, and Blackcurrant Supplementation on Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: An OCT and OCTA Study
by Piera Giunta, Luca D’Andrea, Michele Rinaldi, Maria Paola Laezza, Raffaele Piscopo and Ciro Costagliola
Biomedicines 2025, 13(6), 1352; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13061352 - 31 May 2025
Viewed by 858
Abstract
Purpose: We sought to evaluate the long-term effects of oral citicoline; vitamins A, B, C, and E; and blackcurrant therapy in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) using optical coherence tomography (OCT), OCT angiography (OCTA), and microperimetry parameters. Materials and Methods: Fifteen patients [...] Read more.
Purpose: We sought to evaluate the long-term effects of oral citicoline; vitamins A, B, C, and E; and blackcurrant therapy in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) using optical coherence tomography (OCT), OCT angiography (OCTA), and microperimetry parameters. Materials and Methods: Fifteen patients with POAG (the treated group) received one soluble liquid sachet of a complementary dietary supplement containing, in a fixed combination, citicoline; vitamins A, B, C, and E; and blackcurrant (Citizin®, Bruschettini s.r.l., Genova, Italy) daily for 20 days a month for 1 year. Fifteen age-matched patients with POAG were given a placebo and served as a control group. The patients underwent best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) analysis, Goldmann applanation tonometry, microperimetry examination, OCT, and OCTA at the beginning of the study and then 1, 6, and 12 months later. Results: A significant improvement in the overall retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness values (compared with the control group) was recorded at the 6- (p < 0.009) and 12 (p < 0.001)-month follow-ups in the treated group. The ganglion cell complex (GCC) increased in thickness (compared with the control group) at the 12-month follow-up (p < 0.0001) in the treated group. The mean macular vessel density (MVD) and the mean peripapillary vessel density (PVD) in the treated group were significantly higher than those in the control group at the 12-month follow-up. Microperimetry examination, BCVA, and Goldmann applanation tonometry showed no statistically significant alterations. Conclusions: A fixed combination of citicoline; vitamins A, B, C, and E; and blackcurrant administered orally may have a positive impact on RNFL, GCC, MVD, and PVD in patients with POAG. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular and Translational Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 546 KiB  
Article
Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements with Goldmann Applanation Tonometry, iCare, and Tono-Pen in Young Children with Anterior Segment Abnormalities Under General Anesthesia
by Matias K. Studer, Milko Iliev, Christoph Tappeiner, Beatrice E. Frueh and Stephan A. Fraenkl
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(10), 3338; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14103338 - 11 May 2025
Viewed by 573
Abstract
Background: In young patients with suspected elevated intraocular pressure (IOP), examinations under general anesthesia remain the gold standard. This study aimed to compare the reliability of Goldmann applanation tonometry (Perkins), iCare rebound tonometry, and the Tono-Pen in young children under general anesthesia [...] Read more.
Background: In young patients with suspected elevated intraocular pressure (IOP), examinations under general anesthesia remain the gold standard. This study aimed to compare the reliability of Goldmann applanation tonometry (Perkins), iCare rebound tonometry, and the Tono-Pen in young children under general anesthesia in a clinical setting. Methods: This retrospective study included patients under six years of age requiring an ophthalmic examination under general anesthesia. IOP measurements were performed using all three devices, and central corneal thickness (CCT) was recorded for each patient. Results: A total of 38 eyes of 19 children (mean age, 1.8 ± 2.1 years) were included. IOP values of all three devices ranged from 5 to 43 mmHg, with a mean CCT of 645.6 ± 135 µm. The Tono-Pen recorded significantly higher IOP values than the Perkins tonometer (15.2 ± 5.5 mmHg vs. 11.1 ± 4.8 mmHg; p = 0.002), while no significant differences were observed between Perkins and iCare. CCT was significantly correlated with iCare (r = 0.344, p = 0.032) and the Tono-Pen (r = 0.519, p = 0.001) but not with Perkins (r = 0.247, p = 0.129). Bland–Altman analysis showed a significant slope for inter-device differences, but when excluding IOP values >25 mmHg, the slope was no longer significant. Conclusions: Among the devices tested, the Perkins tonometer was the least affected by other parameters such as CCT and IOP values in young patients under general anesthesia, particularly when IOP exceeded 25 mmHg or corneal thickness was increased. In patients with normal corneas and IOP below 25 mmHg, iCare provided comparable accuracy to Perkins, while the Tono-Pen consistently overestimated IOP compared to both devices. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Insights into Glaucoma)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1681 KiB  
Article
Clinical Assessment of Automated Non-Contact Tonometer: Interchangeability with Goldmann Applanation Tonometry and Repeatability
by Michael Chaglasian, Huiyuan Hou, Mayra Tafreshi, Mary K. Durbin, Ece Turhal, David Kasanoff, Sasan Moghimi and Alex S. Huang
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(8), 2726; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14082726 - 15 Apr 2025
Viewed by 807
Abstract
Background/Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical interchangeability of intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements between a non-contact tonometer (NCT), the TRK-3 OMNIA, and Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and to assess the repeatability of TRK-3 measurements. Methods: This prospective, multicenter study included [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical interchangeability of intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements between a non-contact tonometer (NCT), the TRK-3 OMNIA, and Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and to assess the repeatability of TRK-3 measurements. Methods: This prospective, multicenter study included 120 subjects stratified into three IOP groups based on GAT measurements: low IOP (7–16 mmHg), intermediate IOP (>16 to <23 mmHg), and high IOP (≥23 mmHg). The study eye was randomly selected from each subject. IOP was measured using both TRK-3 OMNIA and GAT following a standardized protocol. Agreement between the two methods was evaluated using Bland–Altman analysis, 95% limits of agreement (LoA), and equivalence testing via the two one-sided test (TOST) approach with a predefined ±5 mmHg margin. Linear regression analysis was performed to characterize the relationship between TRK-3 and GAT measurements. The repeatability of TRK-3 measurements was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), repeatability limit, and coefficient of variation (CV). Results: Across all subjects, the mean difference between TRK-3 OMNIA and GAT IOP measurements was −0.2 mmHg. TRK-3 OMNIA overestimated IOP in the low IOP group (mean difference: 2.1 mmHg, LoA: −1.2 to 5.4 mmHg) and underestimated in the high IOP group (mean difference: −2.4 mmHg, LoA: −5.9 to 1.1 mmHg), while agreement was highest in the intermediate IOP group (−0.2 mmHg, LoA: −2.9 to 2.5 mmHg). Despite the systematic trend, equivalence testing confirmed statistical equivalence across all groups, with 90% confidence intervals (CI) of 1.7 to 2.5 mmHg (low IOP group), −0.6 to 0.2 mmHg (intermediate IOP group), and −2.9 to −2.0 mmHg (high IOP group). Linear regression analysis found a strong correlation (r = 0.92) between TRK-3 and GAT. The TRK-3 OMNIA demonstrated good repeatability, with an ICC of 0.94, a repeatability limit of 3.12 mmHg, and a CV of 5.65%. The repeatability limits were 2.22 mmHg, 2.60 mmHg, and 4.19 mmHg in the low, intermediate, and high IOP groups, respectively. Conclusions: TRK-3 OMNIA and GAT measurements showed strong agreement, statistical equivalence, and a high correlation, supporting their clinical interchangeability. TRK-3 also demonstrated high repeatability. These findings indicate that this automated non-contact tonometer provides reliable and repeatable IOP measurements, supporting its integration into routine clinical workflows. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Ophthalmology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 1555 KiB  
Article
The Effects of Antioxidant Cocktail on Ophthalmological Changes Induced by a 60-Day Head-Down Bed Rest in a Randomized Trial
by Marc Kermorgant, Fanny Varenne, Anne Pavy-Le Traon, Thomas Geeraerts, Lisa Barioulet, Pierre Fournié, Rebecca Billette de Villemeur, Marie-Pierre Bareille, Arnaud Beck, Adrianos Golemis, Inês Antunes, Guillemette Gauquelin-Koch, Vincent Soler and Jean-Claude Quintyn
Life 2024, 14(12), 1598; https://doi.org/10.3390/life14121598 - 4 Dec 2024
Viewed by 1055
Abstract
Neuro-ophthalmological changes have been reported after prolonged exposure to microgravity; however, the pathophysiology remains unclear. Furthermore, several countermeasures have been suggested to counteract the side effects of microgravity. The objectives of the present study were twofold: (1) to assess the neuro-ophthalmological impact of [...] Read more.
Neuro-ophthalmological changes have been reported after prolonged exposure to microgravity; however, the pathophysiology remains unclear. Furthermore, several countermeasures have been suggested to counteract the side effects of microgravity. The objectives of the present study were twofold: (1) to assess the neuro-ophthalmological impact of 60 days of head-down bed rest (HDBR) and (2) to determine the potential effects of an antioxidant cocktail. In this case, 20 healthy male subjects completed a 60-day HDBR and were randomly allocated into two groups: a control condition without an antioxidant cocktail (CON) and a condition with an antioxidant cocktail (NUT). The retinal nerve fibre layer thickness (RNFLT) and central retinal thickness (CRT) were assessed with spectral domain optical coherence tomography. The optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) was measured by ocular ultrasonography and used to assess indirect changes in the intracranial pressure (ICP). The intraocular pressure (IOP) was assessed by Goldmann applanation tonometry. The CRT tended to be reduced after HDBR. The ONSD was increased at the end and after HDBR. The IOP tended to decrease after HDBR. Finally, the antioxidant cocktail had minor impacts on the ophthalmological changes induced by HDBR. It is worth noting that two participants presented peripapillary edema. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1078 KiB  
Article
Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements Using Three Different Methods (Goldmann Applanation Tonometry (GAT), Corvis ST, and iCare) Following Penetrating Keratoplasty
by Tatiana Tziola, Argyrios Tzamalis, Spyridon Koronis, Panagiotis Garitsis, Ioannis Tsinopoulos and Nikolaos Ziakas
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(23), 7046; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13237046 - 22 Nov 2024
Viewed by 1012
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Intraocular pressure (IOP) readings using three different methods (Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), Corvis ST, and iCare) were compared in patients who underwent penetrating keratoplasty (PK). Methods: An observational cross-sectional study with prospective recruitment of patients was conducted. IOP measurements were acquired [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Intraocular pressure (IOP) readings using three different methods (Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), Corvis ST, and iCare) were compared in patients who underwent penetrating keratoplasty (PK). Methods: An observational cross-sectional study with prospective recruitment of patients was conducted. IOP measurements were acquired using GAT, iCare, and Corvis (including both uncorrected IOP (CVS-IOP) and biomechanical IOP (bIOP)), and the agreement among methods was analyzed using Bland–Altman plots. Secondary outcomes included the influence of CCT, the number of sutures, the size of the corneal donor button, and the use of antiglaucoma topical medications on the IOP readings using the three methods. Results: Twenty-five eyes from 25 patients were included. The Bland–Altman analysis showed the narrowest limits of agreement (LoA) between GAT and bIOP (7.5 mmHg). The difference between iCare and GAT IOP showed a bias of 1.26 ± 3.8 mmHg, with increased variability in cases with more remaining sutures (p = 0.0079). A higher CCT was moderately associated with lower bIOP readings (p = 0.0067), but no significant impact of CCT on the difference in the IOP measurements between GAT and other tonometers was found. Additionally, there were no significant differences in tonometer readings based on the use of antiglaucoma medications or the corneal donor button size. Conclusions: Good agreement was found between iCare, CVS-IOP, bIOP, and GAT-IOP readings with the comparison between GAT-IOP and bIOP resulting in the narrowest 95% LoA. The difference between the GAT-IOP and iCare readings tended to be influenced by the number of sutures at the graft–host interface. Higher CCT values were associated with lower bIOP readings; however, the differences in tonometer readings compared to GAT-IOP were not found to be influenced by CCT. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advancements in Cornea Transplantation)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

8 pages, 998 KiB  
Article
Relationship between Inter-Eye Asymmetries in Corneal Hysteresis and Visual Field Severity in Patients with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma
by Tadamichi Akagi, Yukiho Kato-Takano, Daiki Miyamoto, Yuta Sakaue, Ryoko Igarashi, Ryu Iikawa, Mao Arimatsu, Makoto Miyajima, Tetsuya Togano and Takeo Fukuchi
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(13), 4514; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12134514 - 6 Jul 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1192
Abstract
This study investigated the influence of asymmetric corneal hysteresis (CH) on asymmetric visual field impairment between right and left eyes in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) without a history of intraocular surgery. CH, corneal resistance factor (CRF), and corneal compensated intraocular pressure [...] Read more.
This study investigated the influence of asymmetric corneal hysteresis (CH) on asymmetric visual field impairment between right and left eyes in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) without a history of intraocular surgery. CH, corneal resistance factor (CRF), and corneal compensated intraocular pressure (IOPcc) were measured using the Ocular Response Analyzer. Differences between the eyes (right eye–left eye: DIFRL) and CH-based and in target parameters (higher CH eye–lower CH eye: DIFCH) were calculated in the same patient. In 242 phakic eyes of 121 patients, older age (p < 0.001), lower CH (p = 0.001), and lower CRF (p = 0.007) were significantly associated with worse standard automated perimetry (SAP) 24-2 mean deviation (MD). The DIFsRL in axial length (p = 0.003), IOPcc (p = 0.028), and CH (p = 0.001) were significantly associated with the DIFRL in SAP24-2 MD, but not in central corneal thickness (CCT), Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) measurement, and CRF. When dividing the patients into two groups based on the median of the CH DIFsCH (0.46), the DIFsCH in CRF (p < 0.001), IOPcc (p < 0.001), CCT (p = 0.004), SAP24-2 MD (p < 0.001), and SAP10-2 MD (p = 0.010) were significantly different between the groups. Large inter-eye asymmetry in CH is an important explanatory factor for disease worsening in patients with POAG. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Advances in Glaucoma)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1584 KiB  
Article
Circadian Fluctuation Changes in Intraocular Pressure Measured Using a Contact Lens Sensor in Patients with Glaucoma after the Adjunctive Administration of Ripasudil: A Prospective Study
by Shih-Kung Huang, Mai Ishii, Yuki Mizuki, Tatukata Kawagoe, Masaki Takeuchi, Eiichi Nomura and Nobuhisa Mizuki
J. Pers. Med. 2023, 13(5), 800; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13050800 - 6 May 2023
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2183
Abstract
Nocturnal and circadian intraocular pressure (IOP) fluctuations are important issues in glaucoma treatment. Ripasudil 0.4% eye drops, a new glaucoma medication, lowers IOP by increasing aqueous humor outflow through the trabecular meshwork. We aimed to compare differences between circadian IOP fluctuations measured using [...] Read more.
Nocturnal and circadian intraocular pressure (IOP) fluctuations are important issues in glaucoma treatment. Ripasudil 0.4% eye drops, a new glaucoma medication, lowers IOP by increasing aqueous humor outflow through the trabecular meshwork. We aimed to compare differences between circadian IOP fluctuations measured using a contact lens sensor (CLS) before and after administering 0.4% ripasudil eye drops adjunctively to patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and normal tension glaucoma (NTG). Patients with POAG (n = 1) and NTG (n = 5) underwent 24 h IOP monitoring with a CLS before and after administering ripasudil eye drops every 12 h (8 a.m., 8 p.m.) for 2 weeks without discontinuing currently used glaucoma medications. No vision-threatening adverse event occurred. The reduction in IOP fluctuation and the reduction in the SD of IOP in 24 h, awake time and sleep time did not reach statistical significance. The baseline office-hour IOP, which was measured using Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), ranged in the low teens, and the reduction in office-hour IOP also did not show a significant difference. Further study is necessary to evaluate whether the low baseline IOP with less IOP reduction relates to attenuated IOP fluctuation reduction. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Challenges and Therapeutic Prospects in Eye Disease)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 824 KiB  
Article
Corneal Tonometric and Morphological Changes in Patients with Acromegaly
by Izabela Skrzypiec, Joanna Wierzbowska, Maria Sobol and Grzegorz Zieliński
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(22), 6750; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11226750 - 15 Nov 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1563
Abstract
(1) Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the changes in Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) parameters, corneal endothelium parameters, central corneal thickness (CCT), and intraocular pressure (IOP) before and after the transsphenoidal resection of pituitary adenoma in patients with acromegaly. (2) Methods: This [...] Read more.
(1) Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the changes in Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) parameters, corneal endothelium parameters, central corneal thickness (CCT), and intraocular pressure (IOP) before and after the transsphenoidal resection of pituitary adenoma in patients with acromegaly. (2) Methods: This was a single-center, prospective, interventional study. Twenty patients with newly diagnosed acromegaly were examined before and 19 ± 9 months after transsphenoidal resection. The participants underwent a comprehensive ophthalmological examination including pneumatic IOP (IOP air puff), Goldmann applanation tonometry (IOP GAT), CCT measured using the iPac pachymeter (CCTUP), IOP value corrected for CCTUP using the Ehlers formula (IOPc) ORA measurements included corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), corneal-compensated IOP (IOPcc), and Goldmann-correlated IOP (IOPg). CCT from non-contact specular microscopy (CCTNSM), the number of endothelial cells (CD) per mm2, and average cell size (AVG) were determined with non-contact specular microscopy. (3) Results: A statistically significant decrease was observed in CCTUP (p = 0.007), and IOP air puff (p = 0.012) after surgery. Moreover, we noted a statistically significant increase in CD (p = 0.001), and a statistically significant decrease in AVG (p = 0.009) and CCTNSM (p = 0.004) after surgery. A statistically significant decrease was also observed in IOPg (p = 0.011), CH (p = 0.016), and CRF (p = 0.001) after surgery. The mean value of IOP GAT and IOPc was lower after the surgery. However, the difference was not statistically significant. (4) Conclusions: Our study revealed significant changes in biomechanics, corneal endothelium, CCT and IOP after pituitary adenoma resection in patients with acromegaly. It proves that the eye might be sensitive to long-term overexposure to growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1). We suggest that disease activity be taken into consideration on ophthalmological examination. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Ophthalmology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 261 KiB  
Review
Intraocular Pressure Measurement after Penetrating Keratoplasty
by Otilia-Maria Dumitrescu, Sinziana Istrate, Mioara-Laura Macovei and Alina Gabriela Gheorghe
Diagnostics 2022, 12(2), 234; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12020234 - 19 Jan 2022
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 2194
Abstract
Assessing the intraocular pressure is a difficult but crucial task in the follow-up of patients that have undergone penetrating keratoplasty. Early recognition of elevated intraocular pressure and/or glaucoma and establishment of the appropriate treatment is essential to ensure the best possible visual outcome [...] Read more.
Assessing the intraocular pressure is a difficult but crucial task in the follow-up of patients that have undergone penetrating keratoplasty. Early recognition of elevated intraocular pressure and/or glaucoma and establishment of the appropriate treatment is essential to ensure the best possible visual outcome for patients dealing with this feared complication. Although Goldmann applanation tonometry is still the gold standard for measuring the intraocular pressure, its limitations in postkeratoplasty eyes, due to postoperative modified corneal morphology, have led to the search for more suitable alternatives. This review is the result of a comprehensive literature search in the MEDLINE database that aims to present glaucoma in the context of perforating keratoplasty, the corneal properties with impact on ocular pressure measurement, and the results achieved with the most important tonometers that have been studied in this pathology. Goldmann applanation tonometry remains the reference for intraocular pressure assessment even in corneas after penetrating keratoplasty. However, some promising alternatives have emerged, the most important of which are the Pascal dynamic contour tonometry, the Tono-Pen XL, the ocular response analyzer, and the iCare. All have advantages and disadvantages but have proved to be appropriate alternatives, especially in cases in which Goldmann applanation tonometry cannot be used. Full article
17 pages, 1930 KiB  
Article
Short-Time Changes of Intraocular Pressure and Biomechanics of the Anterior Segment of the Eye during Water Drinking Test in Patients with XEN GelStent
by Joanna Przeździecka-Dołyk, Ewa Wałek, Agnieszka Jóźwik, Iwona Helemejko, Magdalena Asejczyk-Widlicka and Marta Misiuk-Hojło
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(1), 175; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11010175 - 29 Dec 2021
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2234
Abstract
Purpose: Little is known about short-term changes in intraocular pressure (IOP) following minimally invasive glaucoma surgeries, such as post-XEN GelStent implantation. Although the importance of corneal biomechanics in glaucoma diagnostics has been reported, little work has been conducted on postoperative description of changes [...] Read more.
Purpose: Little is known about short-term changes in intraocular pressure (IOP) following minimally invasive glaucoma surgeries, such as post-XEN GelStent implantation. Although the importance of corneal biomechanics in glaucoma diagnostics has been reported, little work has been conducted on postoperative description of changes when the structure of the anterior segment is altered. The aim of presented study was to evaluate the changes in the biomechanical parameters of the anterior segment of the post-XEN GelStent implantation eyes. Patients and Methods: This investigator-initiated, open-label, prospective, single-center study recruited patients. Patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) after XEN GelStent implantation versus matched POAG controls (considered as control group/CG) treated pharmacologically were screened. Water loading was conducted using 10 mL of water per kilogram of body weight for ≤5 min. Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), corneal hysteresis (CH), and corneal resistance factor (CRF) were performed before water loading and after every 15 min up to 1 h. Results: The water drinking test (WDT) was positive in 3.7% (1 out of 27) of patients in the post-XEN group compared with 22.7% (5 out of 22) of patients in the control group (CG; p < 0.05). Mean fluctuations in GAT during the WDT were higher in the CG group (3.6 ± 2.5 mmHg vs. 2.9 ± 1.3 mmHg, p < 0.001). CRF and CH changed significantly only in the post-XEN group. The mean peak of CH and CRF occurred at 15 and 30 min of the test in the post-XEN group (p = 0.001). Conclusion: WDT is important to assess the ability of compensation mechanisms to reduce fluctuations in IOP after water upload. The relationship between biomechanics of the anterior segment and glaucoma may have substantial impact on surgical outcome evaluation. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 4350 KiB  
Review
How to Measure Intraocular Pressure: An Updated Review of Various Tonometers
by Paolo Brusini, Maria Letizia Salvetat and Marco Zeppieri
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(17), 3860; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10173860 - 27 Aug 2021
Cited by 64 | Viewed by 15085
Abstract
Intraocular pressure (IOP) is an important measurement that needs to be taken during ophthalmic examinations, especially in ocular hypertension subjects, glaucoma patients and in patients with risk factors for developing glaucoma. The gold standard technique in measuring IOP is still Goldmann applanation tonometry [...] Read more.
Intraocular pressure (IOP) is an important measurement that needs to be taken during ophthalmic examinations, especially in ocular hypertension subjects, glaucoma patients and in patients with risk factors for developing glaucoma. The gold standard technique in measuring IOP is still Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT); however, this procedure requires local anesthetics, can be difficult in patients with scarce compliance, surgical patients and children, and is influenced by several corneal parameters. Numerous tonometers have been proposed in the past to address the problems related to GAT. The authors review the various devices currently in use for the measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP), highlighting the main advantages and limits of the various tools. The continuous monitoring of IOP, which is still under evaluation, will be an important step for a more complete and reliable management of patients affected by glaucoma. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Intraocular Pressure and Ocular Hypertension)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 229 KiB  
Article
Risk Factors for the Structural Progression of Myopic Glaucomatous Eyes with a History of Laser Refractive Surgery
by Kwanghyun Lee, Bo Yi Kim, Gong Je Seong, Chan Yun Kim, Hyoung Won Bae and Sang Yeop Lee
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(11), 2408; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10112408 - 29 May 2021
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2274
Abstract
As laser refractive surgeries (LRS) have been widely performed to correct myopia, ophthalmologists easily encounter patients with glaucoma who have a history of LRS. It is well known that intraocular pressure (IOP) in eyes with glaucoma is not accurate when measured using Goldmann [...] Read more.
As laser refractive surgeries (LRS) have been widely performed to correct myopia, ophthalmologists easily encounter patients with glaucoma who have a history of LRS. It is well known that intraocular pressure (IOP) in eyes with glaucoma is not accurate when measured using Goldmann applanation tonometry. However, risk factors for glaucoma progression, particularly those associated with measured IOP, have rarely been studied. We analysed data for 40 patients with a history of LRS and 50 age-matched patients without a history of LRS. Structural progression was defined as significant changes in thickness in the peripapillary retinal nerve fibre layer as identified using optical coherence tomography event-based guided progression analysis. Risk factors were determined via Cox regression analysis. Disc haemorrhage (DH) was associated with glaucoma progression in both the non-LRS group and LRS group (hazard ratio (HR): 4.650, p = 0.012 and HR: 8.666, p = 0.019, respectively). However, IOP fluctuation was associated with glaucoma progression only in the LRS group (HR: 1.452, p = 0.023). Our results show that DH was a significant sign of progression in myopic glaucoma eyes. When treating patients with myopia and glaucoma, IOP fluctuation should be monitored more carefully, even if IOP seems to be well controlled. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recommendations for Clinical Management of Glaucoma)
14 pages, 1378 KiB  
Article
Goldmann Tonometry and Corneal Biomechanics
by Dario Messenio, Marco Ferroni and Federica Boschetti
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(9), 4025; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11094025 - 28 Apr 2021
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 5383
Abstract
Glaucoma is the second cause of irreversible blindness in the world. Intraocular pressure (IOP) is a recognized major risk factor for the development and progression of glaucomatous damage. Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) is internationally accepted as the gold standard for the measurement of [...] Read more.
Glaucoma is the second cause of irreversible blindness in the world. Intraocular pressure (IOP) is a recognized major risk factor for the development and progression of glaucomatous damage. Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) is internationally accepted as the gold standard for the measurement of IOP. The purpose of this study was to search for correlations between Goldmann tonometry and corneal mechanical properties and thickness by means of in vitro tests. IOP was measured by the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GIOP), and by a pressure transducer inserted in the anterior chamber of the eye (TIOP), at increasing pressure levels by addition of saline solution in the anterior chamber of enucleated pig eyes (n = 49). Mechanical properties were also determined by inflation tests. The GAT underestimated the real measurements made by the pressure transducer, with most common differences in the range 15–28 mmHg. The difference between the two instruments, highlighted by the Bland–Altman test, was confirmed by ANOVA, normality tests, and Mann–Whitney’s tests, both on the data arranged for infusions and for the data organized by pressure ranges. Pearson correlation tests revealed a negative correlation between (TIOP-GIOP) and both corneal stiffness and corneal thickness. In conclusion, data obtained showed a discrepancy between GIOP and TIOP more evident for softer and thinner corneas, that is very important for glaucoma detection. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1320 KiB  
Article
The Effect of Corneal Thickness, Densitometry and Curvature on Intraocular Pressure Measurements Obtained by Applanation, Rebound and Dynamic Contour Tonometry
by Marco Antonio de Castro Olyntho Junior, Lucas Bertazzi Augusto, Carolina P. B. Gracitelli and Andrew J. Tatham
Vision 2020, 4(4), 45; https://doi.org/10.3390/vision4040045 - 21 Oct 2020
Cited by 16 | Viewed by 4798
Abstract
Evaluate the effect of corneal thickness, densitometry and curvature on intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained by Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), non-contact tonometry (NCT), rebound tonometry (RT), and dynamic contour tonometry (DCT). A cross-sectional prospective study involving 40 participants was performed. Corneal measurements were [...] Read more.
Evaluate the effect of corneal thickness, densitometry and curvature on intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained by Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), non-contact tonometry (NCT), rebound tonometry (RT), and dynamic contour tonometry (DCT). A cross-sectional prospective study involving 40 participants was performed. Corneal measurements were obtained using Pentacam (Oculus GMbH, Wetzlar, Germany), densitometry was measured at annuli of 0–2, 2–6, 6–10 and 10–12 mm. The relationship between corneal thickness (central, 4 and 6 mm), corneal astigmatism and corneal densitometry and IOP was examined. There was a significant relationship between corneal thickness (central, 4 and 6 mm) and GAT180, GAT90, RT, and NCT (P < 0.001 for all comparisons) but not for DCT. Higher corneal densitometry (6–10 mm and 10–12 mm zones) was associated with higher IOP from GAT180 and GAT90, and higher densitometry in the 6–10 mm zone correlated with higher IOP from NCT, however corneal densitometry increased with age. Accounting for age, the relationship between corneal densitometry and IOP measurements was not significant. In eyes with greater corneal astigmatism there was a greater difference between GAT90 and GAT180 measurements. IOP measurements may be affected by corneal thickness, densitometry and curvature. DCT was less affected by properties of the cornea compared to other devices. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop