Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (7)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = D4Z4 macrosatellite

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
14 pages, 2706 KiB  
Article
Optical Genome Mapping for the Molecular Diagnosis of Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy: Advancement and Challenges
by Stephanie Efthymiou, Richard J. L. F. Lemmers, Venugopalan Y. Vishnu, Natalia Dominik, Benedetta Perrone, Stefano Facchini, Elisa Vegezzi, Sabrina Ravaglia, Lindsay Wilson, Patrick J. van der Vliet, Rinkle Mishra, Alisha Reyaz, Tanveer Ahmad, Rohit Bhatia, James M. Polke, Mv Padma Srivastava, Andrea Cortese, Henry Houlden, Silvère M. van der Maarel, Michael G. Hanna and Enrico Bugiardiniadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Biomolecules 2023, 13(11), 1567; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13111567 - 24 Oct 2023
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 3276
Abstract
Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is the second most common muscular dystrophy in adults, and it is associated with local D4Z4 chromatin relaxation, mostly via the contraction of the D4Z4 macrosatellite repeat array on chromosome 4q35. In this study, we aimed to investigate the [...] Read more.
Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is the second most common muscular dystrophy in adults, and it is associated with local D4Z4 chromatin relaxation, mostly via the contraction of the D4Z4 macrosatellite repeat array on chromosome 4q35. In this study, we aimed to investigate the use of Optical Genome Mapping (OGM) as a diagnostic tool for testing FSHD cases from the UK and India and to compare OGM performance with that of traditional techniques such as linear gel (LGE) and Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) Southern blotting (SB). A total of 6 confirmed and 19 suspected FSHD samples were processed with LGE and PFGE, respectively. The same samples were run using a Saphyr Genome-Imaging Instrument (1-color), and the data were analysed using custom EnFocus FSHD analysis. OGM was able to confirm the diagnosis of FSHD1 in all FSHD1 cases positive for SB (n = 17), and D4Z4 sizing highly correlated with PFGE-SB (p < 0.001). OGM correctly identified cases with mosaicism for the repeat array contraction (n = 2) and with a duplication of the D4Z4 repeat array. OGM is a promising new technology able to unravel structural variants in the genome and seems to be a valid tool for diagnosing FSHD1. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 3070 KiB  
Article
Precise Epigenetic Analysis Using Targeted Bisulfite Genomic Sequencing Distinguishes FSHD1, FSHD2, and Healthy Subjects
by Taylor Gould, Takako I. Jones and Peter L. Jones
Diagnostics 2021, 11(8), 1469; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11081469 - 13 Aug 2021
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 2964
Abstract
The true prevalence of facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is unknown due to difficulties with accurate clinical evaluation and the complexities of current genetic diagnostics. Interestingly, all forms of FSHD are linked to epigenetic changes in the chromosome 4q35 D4Z4 macrosatellite, suggesting that epigenetic [...] Read more.
The true prevalence of facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is unknown due to difficulties with accurate clinical evaluation and the complexities of current genetic diagnostics. Interestingly, all forms of FSHD are linked to epigenetic changes in the chromosome 4q35 D4Z4 macrosatellite, suggesting that epigenetic analysis could provide an avenue for sequence-based FSHD diagnostics. However, studies assessing DNA methylation at the FSHD locus have produced conflicting results; thus, the utility of this technique as an FSHD diagnostic remains controversial. Here, we critically compared two protocols for epigenetic analysis of the FSHD region using bisulfite genomic sequencing: Jones et al., that contends to be individually diagnostic for FSHD1 and FSHD2, and Gaillard et al., that can identify some changes in DNA methylation levels between groups of clinically affected FSHD and healthy subjects, but is not individually diagnostic for any form of FSHD. We performed both sets of assays on the same genetically confirmed samples and showed that this discrepancy was due strictly to differences in amplicon specificity. We propose that the epigenetic status of the FSHD-associated D4Z4 arrays, when accurately assessed, is a diagnostic for genetic FSHD and can readily distinguish between healthy, FSHD1 and FSHD2. Thus, epigenetic diagnosis of FSHD, which can be performed on saliva DNA, will greatly increase accessibility to FSHD diagnostics for populations around the world. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Pathology and Molecular Diagnostics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1251 KiB  
Article
FSHD1 Diagnosis in a Russian Population Using a qPCR-Based Approach
by Nikolay Vladimirovich Zernov, Anna Alekseevna Guskova and Mikhail Yurevich Skoblov
Diagnostics 2021, 11(6), 982; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11060982 - 28 May 2021
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 3179
Abstract
Facioscapulohumeral dystrophy (FSHD) is an autosomal dominant myodystrophy. Approximately 95% of cases of FSHD are caused by partial deletion of the D4Z4 macrosatellite tandem repeats on chromosome 4q35. The existing FSHD1 diagnostic methods are laborious and not widely used. Here, we present a [...] Read more.
Facioscapulohumeral dystrophy (FSHD) is an autosomal dominant myodystrophy. Approximately 95% of cases of FSHD are caused by partial deletion of the D4Z4 macrosatellite tandem repeats on chromosome 4q35. The existing FSHD1 diagnostic methods are laborious and not widely used. Here, we present a comprehensive analysis of the currently used diagnostic methods (Southern blotting and molecular combing) against a new qPCR-based approach for FSHD1 diagnosis. We observed 93% concordance between the results obtained by the new qPCR-based approach, reference Southern blotting and molecular combing methods. Applying the qPCR-based approach in the studied population, we observed a prevalence (64.9%) of the permissive alleles in the range of 3–6 D4Z4 units for a group of patients, while in a group of carriers, the permissive alleles were mostly (84.6%) present in the range of 6–9 D4Z4 units. No prevalence of disease penetrance depending on gender was observed. The results confirmed the earlier established inverse correlation between permissive allele size and disease severity, disease penetrance. The results suggest the applicability of the qPCR-based approach for FSHD1 diagnosis and its robustness in a basic molecular genetics laboratory. To our knowledge, this is the first study of FSHD1 permissive allele distribution in a Russian population. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Pathology and Molecular Diagnostics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 949 KiB  
Review
DUX Hunting—Clinical Features and Diagnostic Challenges Associated with DUX4-Rearranged Leukaemia
by Jacqueline A. Rehn, Matthew J. O'Connor, Deborah L. White and David T. Yeung
Cancers 2020, 12(10), 2815; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12102815 - 30 Sep 2020
Cited by 21 | Viewed by 4891
Abstract
DUX4-rearrangement (DUX4r) is a recently discovered recurrent genomic lesion reported in 4–7% of childhood B cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (B-ALL) cases. This subtype has favourable outcomes, especially in children and adolescents treated with intensive chemotherapy. The fusion most commonly links [...] Read more.
DUX4-rearrangement (DUX4r) is a recently discovered recurrent genomic lesion reported in 4–7% of childhood B cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (B-ALL) cases. This subtype has favourable outcomes, especially in children and adolescents treated with intensive chemotherapy. The fusion most commonly links the hypervariable IGH gene to DUX4 a gene located within the D4Z4 macrosatellite repeat on chromosome 4, with a homologous polymorphic repeat on chromosome 10. DUX4r is cryptic to most standard diagnostic techniques, and difficult to identify even with next generation sequencing assays. This review summarises the clinical features and molecular genetics of DUX4r B-ALL and proposes prospective new diagnostic methods. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Rare Childhood Malignancy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 613 KiB  
Review
Therapeutic Strategies Targeting DUX4 in FSHD
by Laura Le Gall, Eva Sidlauskaite, Virginie Mariot and Julie Dumonceaux
J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9(9), 2886; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9092886 - 7 Sep 2020
Cited by 23 | Viewed by 7036
Abstract
Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is a common muscle dystrophy typically affecting patients within their second decade. Patients initially exhibit asymmetric facial and humeral muscle damage, followed by lower body muscle involvement. FSHD is associated with a derepression of DUX4 gene encoded by the [...] Read more.
Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is a common muscle dystrophy typically affecting patients within their second decade. Patients initially exhibit asymmetric facial and humeral muscle damage, followed by lower body muscle involvement. FSHD is associated with a derepression of DUX4 gene encoded by the D4Z4 macrosatellite located on the subtelomeric part of chromosome 4. DUX4 is a highly regulated transcription factor and its expression in skeletal muscle contributes to multiple cellular toxicities and pathologies ultimately leading to muscle weakness and atrophy. Since the discovery of the FSHD candidate gene DUX4, many cell and animal models have been designed for therapeutic approaches and clinical trials. Today there is no treatment available for FSHD patients and therapeutic strategies targeting DUX4 toxicity in skeletal muscle are being actively investigated. In this review, we will discuss different research areas that are currently being considered to alter DUX4 expression and toxicity in muscle tissue and the cell and animal models designed to date. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Innovative Therapies in Neuromuscular Diseases)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

19 pages, 1681 KiB  
Review
Does DNA Methylation Matter in FSHD?
by Valentina Salsi, Frédérique Magdinier and Rossella Tupler
Genes 2020, 11(3), 258; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11030258 - 28 Feb 2020
Cited by 22 | Viewed by 5772
Abstract
Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) has been associated with the genetic and epigenetic molecular features of the CpG-rich D4Z4 repeat tandem array at 4q35. Reduced DNA methylation of D4Z4 repeats is considered part of the FSHD mechanism and has been proposed as a reliable [...] Read more.
Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) has been associated with the genetic and epigenetic molecular features of the CpG-rich D4Z4 repeat tandem array at 4q35. Reduced DNA methylation of D4Z4 repeats is considered part of the FSHD mechanism and has been proposed as a reliable marker in the FSHD diagnostic procedure. We considered the assessment of D4Z4 DNA methylation status conducted on distinct cohorts using different methodologies. On the basis of the reported results we conclude that the percentage of DNA methylation detected at D4Z4 does not correlate with the disease status. Overall, data suggest that in the case of FSHD1, D4Z4 hypomethylation is a consequence of the chromatin structure present in the contracted allele, rather than a proxy of its function. Besides, CpG methylation at D4Z4 DNA is reduced in patients presenting diseases unrelated to muscle progressive wasting, like Bosma Arhinia and Microphthalmia syndrome, a developmental disorder, as well as ICF syndrome. Consistent with these observations, the analysis of epigenetic reprogramming at the D4Z4 locus in human embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells indicate that other mechanisms, independent from the repeat number, are involved in the control of the epigenetic structure at D4Z4. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue DNA Methylation in Health and Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 3720 KiB  
Article
Antisense Oligonucleotides Used to Target the DUX4 mRNA as Therapeutic Approaches in FaciosScapuloHumeral Muscular Dystrophy (FSHD)
by Eugénie Ansseau, Céline Vanderplanck, Armelle Wauters, Scott Q. Harper, Frédérique Coppée and Alexandra Belayew
Genes 2017, 8(3), 93; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes8030093 - 3 Mar 2017
Cited by 54 | Viewed by 11724
Abstract
FacioScapuloHumeral muscular Dystrophy (FSHD) is one of the most prevalent hereditary myopathies and is generally characterized by progressive muscle atrophy affecting the face, scapular fixators; upper arms and distal lower legs. The FSHD locus maps to a macrosatellite D4Z4 repeat array on chromosome [...] Read more.
FacioScapuloHumeral muscular Dystrophy (FSHD) is one of the most prevalent hereditary myopathies and is generally characterized by progressive muscle atrophy affecting the face, scapular fixators; upper arms and distal lower legs. The FSHD locus maps to a macrosatellite D4Z4 repeat array on chromosome 4q35. Each D4Z4 unit contains a DUX4 gene; the most distal of which is flanked by a polyadenylation site on FSHD-permissive alleles, which allows for production of stable DUX4 mRNAs. In addition, an open chromatin structure is required for DUX4 gene transcription. FSHD thus results from a gain of function of the toxic DUX4 protein that normally is only expressed in germ line and stem cells. Therapeutic strategies are emerging that aim to decrease DUX4 expression or toxicity in FSHD muscle cells. We review here the heterogeneity of DUX4 mRNAs observed in muscle and stem cells; and the use of antisense oligonucleotides (AOs) targeting the DUX4 mRNA to interfere either with transcript cleavage/polyadenylation or intron splicing. We show in primary cultures that DUX4-targeted AOs suppress the atrophic FSHD myotube phenotype; but do not improve the disorganized FSHD myotube phenotype which could be caused by DUX4c over-expression. Thus; DUX4c might constitute another therapeutic target in FSHD. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Therapeutic Alternative Splicing: Mechanisms and Applications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop