Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (13)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = Cyclospora spp.

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
10 pages, 215 KiB  
Article
Validation of an Automated High-Throughput Multiplex Real-Time PCR Assay for Detection of Enteric Protozoa
by Rachel Lau, Jason Kwan, Kimberley Marks-Beaubrun, Ruben Cudiamat, Min Qun Ellen Chen, Krista Orejana, Filip Ralevski and Andrea K. Boggild
Hygiene 2025, 5(1), 8; https://doi.org/10.3390/hygiene5010008 - 4 Mar 2025
Viewed by 1062
Abstract
Background: Microscopy is the conventional method for the identification of gastrointestinal parasitic pathogens in fecal specimens; however, it presents numerous challenges, including high technical expertise burden, multiple staining procedures, and prolonged turnaround time. Molecular methods provide higher throughput and potentially higher sensitivity [...] Read more.
Background: Microscopy is the conventional method for the identification of gastrointestinal parasitic pathogens in fecal specimens; however, it presents numerous challenges, including high technical expertise burden, multiple staining procedures, and prolonged turnaround time. Molecular methods provide higher throughput and potentially higher sensitivity and specificity. Methods: We validated a commercial, automated DNA extraction platform and multiplex parasitic real-time PCR panel (Seegene AllplexTM GI-Parasite Assay) detecting six protozoal pathogens: Blastocystis hominis (Bh), Cryptosporidium spp., Cyclospora cayetanensis (Cc), Dientamoeba fragilis (Df), Entamoeba histolytica (Eh), and Giardia lamblia (Gl) in unpreserved fecal specimens submitted for diagnostic parasitology. Microscopy was the reference standard for all organisms, with stool ELISA as an additional reference assay for Eh. Results: Among 461 unpreserved fecal specimens, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive and negative predictive values of the enteric multiplex for fresh specimens were as follows: 93%, 98.3%, 85.1%, 99.3% for Bh; 100% for all measures in Cryptosporidium and Cc; 100%, 99.3%, 88.5%, 100% for Df; 33.3%, 100%, 100%, 99.6% for Eh; and 100%, 98.9%, 68.8%, 100% for Gl, respectively. With the addition of 17 frozen specimens, the sensitivity for Eh increased to 75%. On a per-batch basis, the molecular platform reduced pre-analytical and analytical testing turnaround time by 7 h. Conclusions: The enteric multiplex platform provides a useful diagnostic tool for clinically relevant enteric protozoa, including Cryptosporidium spp., Cyclospora cayetanensis, Dientamoeba fragilis, and Giardia lamblia. Further evaluation of the assay is required for Entamoeba histolytica prior to clinical use; however, given the widespread availability of confirmatory serology and stool antigen testing for E. histolytica, such performance limitations are of lesser concern. Full article
14 pages, 1870 KiB  
Article
Impact of the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic on the Prevalence and Incidence of Enteric Protozoa in a Spanish Tertiary-Care Hospital and a Referral Center for Tropical Diseases, 2019–2023
by Alfredo Maldonado-Barrueco, Fernando de la Calle-Prieto, Marta Díaz-Menéndez, Marta Arsuaga, Julio García-Rodríguez and Guillermo Ruiz-Carrascoso
Med. Sci. 2025, 13(1), 23; https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci13010023 - 1 Mar 2025
Viewed by 811
Abstract
Objetive: The aim of this study was to describe the impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) against SARS-CoV-2 in patients with symptoms of enteric protozoa (EP), including Blastocystis spp., Dientamoeba fragilis, Giardia lamblia, Cryptosporidium spp., Entamoeba histolytica, and Cyclospora cayetanensis, [...] Read more.
Objetive: The aim of this study was to describe the impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) against SARS-CoV-2 in patients with symptoms of enteric protozoa (EP), including Blastocystis spp., Dientamoeba fragilis, Giardia lamblia, Cryptosporidium spp., Entamoeba histolytica, and Cyclospora cayetanensis, in the overall population and in patients who were consulted at a National Referral Center for Imported Tropical Diseases (NRCITD patients) from a healthcare area in Madrid (Spain). Method: Data on patients with positive RT-PCR results for EP were collected. The periods analyzed were prepandemic (P0, 1 April 2019–31 March 2020), and the first (P1, 1 April 2020–31 March 2021), second (P2, 1 April 2021–31 March 2022), and third (P3, 1 April 2022–31 March 2023) pandemic years. We compared the prevalence, median age, absolute incidence (EP per 100,000 population of each period), and patient profile (NRCITD vs. non-NRCITD) during the study periods using Fisher’s test (p < 0.05) and the T-test (p < 0.001). Results: During P0, 24.8%, [95% CI: 23.9–25.6] of patients tested for EP RT-PCR were positive, 22.6% [95% CI: 21.5–23.7] were positive in P1, 20.4%, [95% CI: 19.5–21.3] were positive during P2, and 20% [95% CI: 19.2–20.9] of patients tested during P3 were positive. During the study, there was no difference in the median ages. The prevalence and absolute incidence of EP showed a decreasing trend during the pandemic for the NRCITD and non-NRCITD patients (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Blastocystis spp. and D. fragilis showed a lower decrease in prevalence during P1 (p > 0.05) due to the higher detection of colonized patients during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. However, G. lamblia and Cryptosporidium spp. showed the highest decrease in prevalence and absolute incidence during P2 (p < 0.05) because of the NPIs implemented during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. The NTRCID patients showed a higher prevalence of Blastocystis spp. than the non-NTRCID patients during every period studied (p < 0.001). E. histolytica and C. cayetanensis showed a homogeneous trend. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Immunology and Infectious Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

8 pages, 669 KiB  
Communication
Molecular Identification and Survey of Cyclospora spp. in Cattle in Shanxi Province, North China
by Ze-Xuan Wu, Yu Kang, Shi-Bo Huang, Ya-Ya Liu, Jin-Jin Mei, Qing Liu and Xing-Quan Zhu
Animals 2024, 14(14), 2114; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14142114 - 20 Jul 2024
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 1302
Abstract
To date, more than 20 species in the genus Cyclospora have been reported. Among them, Cyclospora cayetanensis has been recognized as the causative agent of human cyclosporiasis, which is characterized by severe intestinal injury and prolonged diarrhea in patients with immune dysfunction. The [...] Read more.
To date, more than 20 species in the genus Cyclospora have been reported. Among them, Cyclospora cayetanensis has been recognized as the causative agent of human cyclosporiasis, which is characterized by severe intestinal injury and prolonged diarrhea in patients with immune dysfunction. The presence of C. cayetanensis in cattle has been confirmed. To date, however, no surveillance data are available on the occurrence and prevalence of Cyclospora spp. in cattle in Shanxi Province, North China. In the present study, a total of 761 fecal samples collected from cattle in three representative counties (Qi, Jishan, and Shanyin) in this Province were examined for Cyclospora spp. by using a polymerase-chain-reaction–restriction-fragment-length polymorphism (PCR–RFLP) test based on the nuclear small subunit ribosomal RNA (SSU rRNA) gene. The prevalence of Cyclospora spp. in cattle was 2.1%, and region, age, sex, and breed were not identified to be risk factors. Molecular evolutionary analysis based on the SSU rRNA sequences revealed that all 12 of the isolates were relatively distant from the human pathogen C. cayetanensis; seven isolates were grouped with Cyclospora colobi, whereas the others were grouped with cattle Cyclospora spp. reported previously. Though C. cayetanensis was not detected in cattle in the present study, more investigations should be performed in human populations, other animal species, or cattle from other regions of Shanxi Province and other environmental sources from the One Health perspective. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

54 pages, 4151 KiB  
Review
Food and Drinking Water as Sources of Pathogenic Protozoans: An Update
by Franca Rossi, Serena Santonicola, Carmela Amadoro, Lucio Marino and Giampaolo Colavita
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(12), 5339; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14125339 - 20 Jun 2024
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 7862
Abstract
This narrative review was aimed at collecting updated knowledge on the risk factors, illnesses caused, and measures for the prevention of protozoan infections transmitted by food and drinking water. Reports screened dated from 2019 to the present and regarded global prevalence in food [...] Read more.
This narrative review was aimed at collecting updated knowledge on the risk factors, illnesses caused, and measures for the prevention of protozoan infections transmitted by food and drinking water. Reports screened dated from 2019 to the present and regarded global prevalence in food handlers, occurrence in food and drinking water, impact on human health, and recently reported outbreaks and cases of severe infections attributable to the dietary route. Cryptosporidium spp., Cyclospora cayetanensis, Entamoeba histolytica, and Cystoisospora belli were the protozoans most frequently involved in recently reported waterborne and foodborne outbreaks and cases. Blastocystis hominis was reported to be the most widespread intestinal protozoan in humans, and two case reports indicated its pathogenic potential. Dientamoeba fragilis, Endolimax nana, and Pentatrichomonas hominis are also frequent but still require further investigation on their ability to cause illness. A progressive improvement in surveillance of protozoan infections and infection sources took place in developed countries where the implementation of reporting systems and the application of molecular diagnostic methods led to an enhanced capacity to identify epidemiological links and improve the prevention of foodborne and waterborne protozoan infections. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Applied Microbiology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

83 pages, 403 KiB  
Article
Collider Bias Assessment in Colombian Indigenous Wiwa and Kogui Populations with Chronic Gastroenteric Disorder of Likely Infectious Etiology Suggests Complex Microbial Interactions Rather Than Clear Assignments of Etiological Relevance
by Hagen Frickmann, Joy Backhaus, Achim Hoerauf, Ralf Matthias Hagen and Simone Kann
Microorganisms 2024, 12(5), 970; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12050970 - 11 May 2024
Viewed by 1347
Abstract
Multiple microbial detections in stool samples of indigenous individuals suffering from chronic gastroenteric disorder of a likely infectious origin, characterized by recurring diarrhea of variable intensity, in the rural north-east of Colombia are common findings, making the assignment of etiological relevance to individual [...] Read more.
Multiple microbial detections in stool samples of indigenous individuals suffering from chronic gastroenteric disorder of a likely infectious origin, characterized by recurring diarrhea of variable intensity, in the rural north-east of Colombia are common findings, making the assignment of etiological relevance to individual pathogens challenging. In a population of 773 indigenous people from either the tribe Wiwa or Kogui, collider bias analysis was conducted comprising 32 assessed microorganisms including 10 bacteria (Aeromonas spp., Campylobacter spp., enteroaggregative Escherichia coli (EAEC), enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC), enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC), Salmonella spp., Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC), Shigella spp./enteroinvasive Escherichia coli (EIEC), Tropheryma whipplei and Yersinia spp.), 11 protozoa (Blastocystis spp., Cryptosporidium spp., Cyclospora spp., Dientamoeba fragilis, Entamoeba coli, Entamoeba bangladeshi/dispar/histolytica/moshkovskii complex, Entamoeba histolytica, Endolimax nana, Giardia duodenalis, Iodamoeba buetschlii and Pentatrichomonas hominis), 8 helminths (Ascaris spp., Enterobius vermicularis, Hymenolepis spp., Necator americanus, Schistosoma spp., Strongyloides spp., Taenia spp. and Trichuris spp.), microsporidia (Encephalocytozoon spp.) and fungal elements (microscopically observed conidia and pseudoconidia). The main results indicated that negative associations potentially pointing towards collider bias were infrequent events (n = 14), while positive associations indicating increased likelihood of co-occurrence of microorganisms quantitatively dominated (n = 88). Microorganisms showing the most frequent negative associations were EPEC (n = 6) and Blastocystis spp. (n = 3), while positive associations were most common for Trichuris spp. (n = 16), Dientamoeba fragilis (n = 15), Shigella spp./EIEC (n = 12), Ascaris spp. (n = 11) and Blastocystis spp. (n = 10). Of note, positive associations quantitively dominated for Blastocystis spp. In conclusion, collider bias assessment did not allow clear-cut assignment of etiological relevance for detected enteric microorganisms within the assessed Colombian indigenous population. Instead, the results suggested complex microbial interactions with potential summative effects. Future studies applying alternative biostatistical approaches should be considered to further delineate respective interactions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Novel Strategies in the Study of the Human Gut Microbiota 2.0)
13 pages, 472 KiB  
Article
The Application of 3base™ Technology to Diagnose Eight of the Most Clinically Important Gastrointestinal Protozoan Infections
by Mahdis Aghazadeh, Meghan Jones, Suneth Perera, Jiny Nair, Litty Tan, Brett Clark, Angela Curtis, Jackson Jones, Justin Ellem, Tom Olma, Damien Stark, John Melki, Neralie Coulston, Rohan Baker and Douglas Millar
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(17), 13387; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241713387 - 29 Aug 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1768
Abstract
Globally, over 3.5 billion people are infected with intestinal parasites each year, resulting in over 200,000 deaths. Three of the most common protozoan pathogens that affect the gastrointestinal tract of humans are Cryptosporidium spp., Giardia intestinalis, and Entamoeba histolytica. Other protozoan agents [...] Read more.
Globally, over 3.5 billion people are infected with intestinal parasites each year, resulting in over 200,000 deaths. Three of the most common protozoan pathogens that affect the gastrointestinal tract of humans are Cryptosporidium spp., Giardia intestinalis, and Entamoeba histolytica. Other protozoan agents that have been implicated in gastroenteritis in humans include Cyclospora cayetanensis, Dientamoeba fragilisBlastocystis hominis, and the microsporidia Enterocytozoon bieneusi and Encephalitozoon intestinalis. Genetic Signatures previously developed a 3base™ multiplexed Real-Time PCR (mRT-PCR) enteric protozoan kit (EP001) for the detection of Giardia intestinalis/lamblia/duodenalis, Cryptosporidium spp., E. histolytica, D. fragilis, and B. hominis. We now describe improvements to this kit to produce a more comprehensive assay, including C. cayetanensis, E. bieneusi, and E. intestinalis, termed EP005. The clinical performance of EP005 was assessed using a set of 380 clinical samples against a commercially available PCR test and other in-house nucleic acid amplification tests where commercial tests were not available. All methods provided at least 90% agreement. EP005 had no cross-reactivity against 82 organisms commonly found in the gut. The EP005 method streamlines the detection of gastrointestinal parasites and addresses the many challenges of traditional microscopic detection, resulting in cost savings and significant improvements in patient care. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Modern Strategies for Diagnosis and Treatment of Parasitic Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 731 KiB  
Article
Evaluation of the Performance of the Novodiag® Stool Parasites Assay for the Detection of Intestinal Protozoa and Microsporidia
by Pamela Chauvin, Florie Barba, Emilie Guemas, Eléna Charpentier, Claire Cottrel, Judith Fillaux, Alexis Valentin, Sarah Baklouti, Sophie Cassaing, Sandie Ménard, Antoine Berry and Xavier Iriart
Pathogens 2023, 12(7), 889; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12070889 - 29 Jun 2023
Viewed by 2540
Abstract
Objectives: We aimed to assess the performance of the Novodiag® Stool Parasites (NSP) assay in the diagnosis of the most common intestinal protozoan and microsporidia infections. Methods: A panel of 167 selected stool samples was retrospectively analysed with the NSP assay and [...] Read more.
Objectives: We aimed to assess the performance of the Novodiag® Stool Parasites (NSP) assay in the diagnosis of the most common intestinal protozoan and microsporidia infections. Methods: A panel of 167 selected stool samples was retrospectively analysed with the NSP assay and compared to routine microscopy and qPCR methods for the detection of pathogenic protozoa and microsporidia. Results: Whereas specificity was high for all protozoa and microsporidia, NSP sensitivity was strongly dependent on the comparative method used as reference. When compared to microscopic methods, NSP sensitivity was high (96.7 to 100%) for Blastocystis hominis, Entamoeba histolytica and Cyclospora cayetanensis but was lower for Giardia intestinalis (85.2%) and ≤50% for Cystoisospora belli and Dientamoeba fragilis. In comparison to conventional qPCR, the NSP assay demonstrated lower sensitivity characteristics dependent on parasite loads, reaching 60 to 70% for G. intestinalis, D. fragilis, Cryptosporidium spp. and E. histolytica. Sensitivity was 100% for Enterocytozoon bieneusi, but none of the five samples containing Encephalitozoon spp. were detected. Conclusions: The overall performance of the NSP assay in the diagnosis of gastrointestinal protozoa and microsporidia seems to be better than or equivalent to that observed with microscopic methods but inferior to that obtainable with classical targeted qPCR. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 1034 KiB  
Article
Molecular Epidemiological Investigation of Cyclospora spp. in Holstein Cattle in Partial Areas of the Yunnan Province, China
by Jian-Fa Yang, Zhao-Jun Heng, Fan-Fan Shu, Hua-Ming Mao, Yong-Sheng Su, Jun-Jun He and Feng-Cai Zou
Animals 2023, 13(9), 1527; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13091527 - 3 May 2023
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 1875
Abstract
Cyclospora spp. is a food-borne intestinal protozoan, which is widely distributed in the world and poses the risk of zoonosis. In order to reveal the prevalence of Cyclospora spp. in Holstein cattle in partial areas of the Yunnan Province, 524 fresh fecal samples [...] Read more.
Cyclospora spp. is a food-borne intestinal protozoan, which is widely distributed in the world and poses the risk of zoonosis. In order to reveal the prevalence of Cyclospora spp. in Holstein cattle in partial areas of the Yunnan Province, 524 fresh fecal samples of Holstein cattle were collected from Dali, Kunming, Chuxiong, and Qujing in Yunnan Province. A nested PCR amplification of the small subunit (SSU) rRNA gene of Cyclospora spp. was carried out, and the products of the nested PCR were further analyzed by restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) using Bsp E Ⅰ. The results of the present study showed that 13 samples were positive for Cyclospora spp., and the total infection rate of Cyclospora sp. was 2.48%. The infection of Cyclospora spp. was detected in Dali, Qujing, and Chuxiong. Chuxiong showed the highest infection rate (5.71%), and infection rate in Dali and Qujing was 2.19% and 3.16%, respectively. Interestingly, the infection of Cyclospora spp. was not detected in Kunming. The infection of Cyclospora spp. showed no significant differences among different regions (p > 0.05). Cyclospora sp. infection was detected in all ages and sexes, but the differences were not significant (p > 0.05). Sequencing and phylogenetic analysis showed that five Cyclospora spp. samples were closely related to the Cyclospora spp. of humans, and the others were closely related to the Cyclospora spp. of bovines. The results of the present study suggested that there was an infection of Cyclospora spp. in Holstein cattle in the Yunnan Province, and the Cyclospora spp. showed a risk of zoonosis. Thus, the prevention and control of Cyclospora spp. should be strengthened in the Yunnan Province, China. The results of this investigation provide data references for the further research of Cyclosporiasis in Holstein cattle in the Yunnan Province. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 1442 KiB  
Article
An Integrative Approach to Healthy Social-Ecological System to Support Increased Resilience of Resource Management in Food-Producing Systems
by Laura Urdes, Violeta-Elena Simion, Laurentiu-Gabriel Talaghir and Veronica Mindrescu
Sustainability 2022, 14(22), 14830; https://doi.org/10.3390/su142214830 - 10 Nov 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2324
Abstract
The study addresses health-associated risks and health indicators required for the framing of Social-Ecological System Health (SESH) in aquaculture food-producing systems. The advantages of using a healthy Social-Ecological System (SES) are highlighted, to aid in the development of a new ecological system fostering [...] Read more.
The study addresses health-associated risks and health indicators required for the framing of Social-Ecological System Health (SESH) in aquaculture food-producing systems. The advantages of using a healthy Social-Ecological System (SES) are highlighted, to aid in the development of a new ecological system fostering the sustainability of aquatic ecosystems. The study used statistic modelling of some human infections with Cryptosporidium spp. and Cyclospora spp., used to obtain an estimate of the costs of zoonoses to health systems, and the outcomes of an epidemiological study involving the Eustrongylides spp. in fish. The study indicated that parasitic zoonoses have an important economic impact on health systems, environment and society at large. Holistic approaches to health, addressing all relevant actors are required to mitigate these impacts. To address the risk of eustrongylides and other fish-, and water-borne zoonoses, the development of new social-ecological system health should be constructed. For aquaculture production, such systems must include a biosecurity plan co-developed and negotiated by all relevant stakeholders. While the system’s feasibility is yet to be validated, regular revision of such systems’ functioning and outputs is an important premise to make them operational. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 1674 KiB  
Article
Protozoa as the “Underdogs” for Microbiological Quality Evaluation of Fresh Vegetables
by Cláudia S. Marques, Susana Sousa, António Castro, Vânia Ferreira, Paula Teixeira and José M. Correia da Costa
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(14), 7145; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12147145 - 15 Jul 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2953
Abstract
The monitoring of the microbial quality of fresh products in the industrial environment has mainly focused on bacterial indicators. Protozoa, such as Giardia duodenalis, Cryptosporidium spp., Toxoplasma gondii, and Cyclospora cayetanensis, are routinely excluded from detection and surveillance systems, despite [...] Read more.
The monitoring of the microbial quality of fresh products in the industrial environment has mainly focused on bacterial indicators. Protozoa, such as Giardia duodenalis, Cryptosporidium spp., Toxoplasma gondii, and Cyclospora cayetanensis, are routinely excluded from detection and surveillance systems, despite guidelines and regulations that support the need for tracking and monitoring these pathogens in fresh food products. Previous studies performed by our laboratory, within the scope of the SafeConsume project, clearly indicated that consumption of fresh produce may be a source of T. gondii, thus posing a risk for the contraction of toxoplasmosis for susceptible consumers. Therefore, preliminary work was performed in order to assess the microbiological quality of vegetables, highlighting not only bacteria (Escherichia. coli, Listeria monocytogenes, and Salmonella spp.), but also the zoonotic protozoa G. duodenalis and Cryptosporidium spp. Although all samples were found to be acceptable based on bacteriological parameters, cysts of G. duodenalis and oocysts of Cryptosporidium spp. were observed in vegetables. Moreover, it was possible to genetically characterize G. duodenalis positive samples as assemblage A, a genotype that poses risks to human health. Although these are preliminary results, they highlight the need to include protozoa in the microbiological criteria for foodstuffs, as required by EU Law No. 1441/2007, and to improve inactivation and removal procedures of (oo)cysts in fresh produce and water. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Multi-Contamination of Foods and Mixture Effects)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 2152 KiB  
Review
Life Cycle and Transmission of Cyclospora cayetanensis: Knowns and Unknowns
by Jitender P. Dubey, Asis Khan and Benjamin M. Rosenthal
Microorganisms 2022, 10(1), 118; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10010118 - 6 Jan 2022
Cited by 16 | Viewed by 6537
Abstract
Although infections with Cyclospora cayetanensis are prevalent worldwide, many aspects of this parasite’s life cycle and transmission remain unknown. Humans are the only known hosts of this parasite. Existing information on its endogenous development has been derived from histological examination of only a [...] Read more.
Although infections with Cyclospora cayetanensis are prevalent worldwide, many aspects of this parasite’s life cycle and transmission remain unknown. Humans are the only known hosts of this parasite. Existing information on its endogenous development has been derived from histological examination of only a few biopsy specimens. Its asexual and sexual stages occur in biliary-intestinal epithelium. In histological sections, its stages are less than 10 μm, making definitive identification difficult. Asexual (schizonts) and sexual (gamonts) are located in epithelial cells. Male microgamonts have two flagella; female macrogametes contain wall-forming bodies. Oocysts are excreted in feces unsporulated. Sporulation occurs in the environment, but there are many unanswered questions concerning dissemination and survival of C. cayetanensis oocysts. Biologically and phylogenetically, C. cayetanensis closely resembles Eimeria spp. that parastize chickens; among them, E. acervulina most closely resembles C. cayetanensis in size. Here, we review known and unknown aspects of its life cycle and transmission and discuss the appropriateness of surrogates best capable of hastening progress in understanding its biology and developing mitigating strategies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cyclospora cayetanensis and Cyclosporiasis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1184 KiB  
Article
High Prevalence of Intestinal Pathogens in Indigenous in Colombia
by Simone Kann, Daniela Bruennert, Jessica Hansen, Gustavo Andrés Concha Mendoza, José José Crespo Gonzalez, Cielo Leonor Armenta Quintero, Miriam Hanke, Ralf Matthias Hagen, Joy Backhaus and Hagen Frickmann
J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9(9), 2786; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9092786 - 28 Aug 2020
Cited by 27 | Viewed by 4017
Abstract
Background: Intestinal infections remain a major public health burden in developing countries. Due to social, ecological, environmental, and cultural conditions, Indigenous peoples in Colombia are at particularly high risk. Materials: 137 stool samples were analyzed by microscopy and real-time-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR), targeting [...] Read more.
Background: Intestinal infections remain a major public health burden in developing countries. Due to social, ecological, environmental, and cultural conditions, Indigenous peoples in Colombia are at particularly high risk. Materials: 137 stool samples were analyzed by microscopy and real-time-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR), targeting protozoan parasites (Giardia intestinalis, Entamoeba histolytica, Cryptosporidium spp., and Cyclospora cayetanensis), bacteria (Campylobacter jejuni, Salmonella spp., Shigella ssp./enteroinvasive E. coli (EIEC), Yersinia spp., enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC), enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC), enterotoxin-producing E. coli (ETEC), enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC), and Tropheryma whipplei), and helminths (Necator americanus, Strongyloides stercoralis, Ascaris lumbricoides, Ancylostoma spp., Trichuris. trichiura, Taenia spp., Hymenolepis nana, Enterobius vermicularis, and Schistosoma spp.). Microscopy found additional cases of helminth infections. Results: At least one pathogen was detected in 93% of the samples. The overall results revealed protozoa in 79%, helminths in 69%, and bacteria in 41%. G. intestinalis (48%), Necator/hookworm (27%), and EAEC (68%) were the most common in each group. Noteworthy, T. whipplei was positive in 7% and T. trichirua in 23% of the samples. A significant association of one infection promoting the other was determined for G. intestinalis and C. jejuni, helminth infections, and EIEC. Conclusions: The results illustrate the high burden of gastrointestinal pathogens among Indigenous peoples compared to other developing countries. Countermeasures are urgently required. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Infectious Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 804 KiB  
Article
Evaluation of the AllplexTM Gastrointestinal Panel—Parasite Assay for Protozoa Detection in Stool Samples: A Retrospective and Prospective Study
by Brice Autier, Jean-Pierre Gangneux and Florence Robert-Gangneux
Microorganisms 2020, 8(4), 569; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8040569 - 15 Apr 2020
Cited by 25 | Viewed by 4036
Abstract
This study aims at evaluating the performances of the multiplex PCR AllplexTM Gastrointestinal Panel-Parasite Assay (GIPPA), which detects G. duodenalis, Cryptosporidium spp., E. histolytica, D. fragilis, B. hominis, and C. cayetanensis, by comparison to microscopy. A retrospective [...] Read more.
This study aims at evaluating the performances of the multiplex PCR AllplexTM Gastrointestinal Panel-Parasite Assay (GIPPA), which detects G. duodenalis, Cryptosporidium spp., E. histolytica, D. fragilis, B. hominis, and C. cayetanensis, by comparison to microscopy. A retrospective evaluation was conducted on a series of positive clinical samples (n = 99) stored at −80 °C or at +4 °C. A five-month prospective study was then conducted on all samples sent to our lab for parasite detection (n = 586). In the retrospective cohort, sensitivity was 81% for both G. duodenalis (26/32) and D. fragilis (21/26) and 100% for Cryptosporidium spp. (26/26, including 6 different species), B. hominis (26/26), and C. cayetanensis (4/4). During the prospective study, 95 samples were positive by microscopy and 207 by multiplex PCR assay. The molecular assay showed a significantly higher sensitivity of PCR, especially for G. duodenalis (100% vs. 60.7%, p < 0.01), D. fragilis (97.2% vs. 14.1%, p < 0.001), and B. hominis (99.4% vs. 44.2%, p < 0.001) but also for E. histolytica (100% vs. 50.0%). The sensitivity of the AllplexTM GIPPA on the first stool sample was equivalent to the sensitivity of microscopy on multiple stool samples but inferior to multiplex PCR on multiple stool samples. Taken together, the AllplexTM GIPPA is suitable for the routine detection of protozoa in fecal samples. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop