Search Results (21)

In addressing the complexities of sustainable development, the integration of digital technologies (DTs) with supply chain collaboration offers firms diverse strategic solutions. While prior studies have examined how DT shapes internal decision-making and stakeholder engagement, limited attention has been paid to how DT influences the dynamic collaborative capabilities of distinct supply chain stakeholders in advancing corporate sustainability. Grounded in the dynamic resource-based view (Dynamic RBV), this study conceptualizes sustainable dynamic capabilities (SDCs) as comprising sustainable information capability (SIC) and sustainable relationship capability (SRC)—the abilities to share sustainability-related information and to adapt and leverage external sustainable partnerships, respectively. Using panel data from manufacturing firms listed on China’s Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share markets between 2010 and 2023, sourced from CSMAR and iFinD databases, this study employs fixed-effects and system GMM models to test the proposed relationships. Results show that DT enhances SIC, which in turn facilitates SRC, ultimately improving corporate sustainability performance (CSP). Moreover, firms at different supply chain positions exhibit distinct sustainability priorities as upstream suppliers focus on resource efficiency, while downstream customers emphasize environmental compliance and product-level sustainability. These upstream and downstream actors influence CSP through two mechanisms—resource-driven “source-push” and demand-driven “value chain-pull”. This study deepens the understanding of stakeholder heterogeneity in sustainable collaboration and offers practical insights for managers to tailor sustainability strategies that reinforce supply chain-wide dynamic capabilities. Full article

Recent decades have witnessed an increased volume of studies investigating the spa tourism sector. There has, however, been an absence of studies evaluating the relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and spa competitiveness, as well as the mediating effects of responsible innovation (RI) and corporate sustainability performance (CSP) on this relationship. This study developed a comprehensive conceptual framework that examined the impacts of CSR on spa competitiveness. Data were collected from 786 participants, who included spa managers and employees located in three main cities of Vietnam: Ha Noi, Da Nang, and Ho Chi Minh. The Partial Least-Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) method was applied to provide statistical evidence to confirm the conceptual model and eight hypotheses. The findings indicated that CSR positively and indirectly affects spa competitiveness. The mediating roles of RI and CSP, which influence the relationship with spa competitiveness, were also confirmed. This research makes theoretical contributions to understanding the relationships between these internal factors and achieving competitiveness. Further, the study has practical implications for spa managers and policymakers implementing CSR programs and RI and reshaping CSP to obtain and maintain their competitiveness. Full article

This study proposes that MNCs might withdraw from the CSR concept to gain tangible benefits, like improved corporate financial performance (CFP), and intangible benefits, such as reputational capital (RC). This represents a paradigm shift from the philanthropic end of the spectrum to the strategic win–win side, where all investments are expected to yield a return. Being tacit, quests for reputational returns are discussed in terms of corporate social performance (CSP) with its currency being RC (an intangible asset). However, this requires a deep understanding of the CSP concept and ‘good management’. This study argues that CSR will change trajectory based on three facets. First, we argue for the replacement of CSR by CSP, where ESG becomes ‘business as usual’. Second, regulatory categories (voluntary or legislated) will merge. Third, ethics endorsing ‘good management’ will alter executive mindsets, making CSP deeply embedded in corporate behavior. Organizational behavior towards CSP must, therefore, be sincere yet not embedded overwhelmingly. We extend previous discussions regarding the relationship between CSP and CFP, who present robust evidence that (1) absent CSR embedment has no/neutral CSP and CFP effect; (2) inadequate CSR yields negative CSP and CFP; and (3) productive CSR positively affects CSP and CFP. Consequently, this study argues that (4) strategic CSR (SCSR) maximizes positive CSP and that (5) excessive CSR is detrimental, yielding negative effects on both CSP and CFP. This study, therefore, conjectures the existence of a ‘sweet spot’, where SCSR optimizes CSP and CFP outcomes. The contributions address ESG engagement as a ‘sweet spot’ concept and provide a model enabling SCSR discussion, CSP evaluations, and an implementation framework for its achievement. The framework gives executives a toolbox to influence their stakeholders toward improved CFP. Therefore, our perspective supports CSP embedment, enabling firms to address business growth and sustainability requirements. Full article

Green work–life balance (GWLB) has emerged from sustainability and work–life balance (WLB) studies. The goal is to examine how GWLB policies benefit organisations. This focuses how individuals could reduce an organisation’s environmental impact. The sustainability of green human resource management (GHRM) practices and human resource (HR) operations has changed significantly in recent years. HR are an organisation’s most important assets. This study examines how GWLB and GHRM practices affect a corporate sustainability performance (CSP) and employee retention (ER) of UK’s industrial companies. It also examines how organisational culture (OC) andgreen innovation (GI), affect these aspects. This study surveyed 450 operational supervisors in a variety of manufacturing firms in the UK. A self-administered survey using a scale was used to collect data. SPSS 26 and Smart PLS 4 analysed the data. According to research, GHRM practices and GWLB programs improve CSP and ER. The data also show that GI mediates the relationship between GHRM practices, ER, GWLB, and CSP. In the UK manufacturing industry, OC helps maintain a GWLB, ER, implement environmentally friendly HR practices, and achieve CSP goals. This study will methodologically, practically, and theoretically affect HR specialists, academics, and corporate leaders. Full article

As firms increasingly engage in both corporate social responsibility (CSR) and irresponsibility (CSIR) activities, this study expands the traditional question “does it pay to do more CSR?” to explore the less-studied question “does it pay to do less CSIR?”. We employ stakeholder theory and expectancy disconfirmation theory to outline three sustainable strategies for firms to financially benefit (enlightened self-interest) from CSR/CSIR activities: proactive strategy (increasing CSR, or doing more good), rectification strategy (reducing CSIR, or doing less bad), and aggressive strategy (increasing CSR while reducing CSIR, or doing more good and less bad). Our research objective is to evaluate the financial viability of different CSR/CSIR strategies. We hypothesize that the rectification strategy will surpass the proactive approach, while anticipating that the aggressive strategy will emerge as the most financially advantageous. Our dataset consists of 12,567 firm-year observations (3422 firms) spanning 1994 to 2013, and we conduct rigorous analyses to evaluate these strategies. The findings reveal that the rectification strategy surpasses the proactive strategy, with the aggressive strategy emerging as the most advantageous. The study contributes theoretically and offers managerial insights into these results. Full article

Chief sustainability officers and sustainability consultants have become increasingly common today as many organizations have become more aware of their impact on the environment and society at large. With the growing importance of integrating sustainability into business, many firms are appointing chief sustainability officers to manage and oversee the sustainability affairs of their firms at various levels. However, very little is known about the chief sustainability officer and the sustainability management team. This study investigates the potential importance of the chief sustainability officer (CSO) and the sustainability management team toward the firm’s environmental performance. Using a sample of Korean-listed companies for the year 2017–2020, this study aims to investigate the relationship between appointment of the chief sustainability officer and a firm’s environmental performance. It also explores the possible mediating role of corporate sustainability practices (CSP) in this relationship, utilizing Baron and Kenny’s method to analyze the mediating role. First, the regression analysis was conducted to assess the impact of the presence and role of CSO on the firm’s environmental performance. Subsequently, the firm’s CSP was then introduced into the regression analysis as a mediator, to evaluate its influence on the relationship between the chief sustainability officer and the firm’s environmental performance. We found that CSP completely mediated the relationship between CSO and environmental performance. This study contributes empirically to the growing literature on the relevance of sustainability management officials and their impacts on the firm’s environmental performance. Full article

Government requests and societal expectations have pressured high-polluting companies to focus on corporate social responsibility strategies. Using the upper echelons theory as a theoretical framework, we investigated how top management team (TMT) faultlines influence corporate social performance (CSP) based on data from 212 high-polluting companies. The results showed that CSP can be improved by reducing corporate social irresponsibility (CSiR), knowledge-based faultlines have a U-shaped effect on CSiR, and there is a knowledge-based faultline critical point. This implies that knowledge-based faultlines can improve CSiR before reaching this critical point. Additionally, medium-strength knowledge-based faultlines are more conducive to improving irresponsible behavior. CEO power plays a significant moderating role in the relationship between TMT faultlines and CSiR and slows the U-shaped effect of knowledge-based faultlines on CSiR. These findings could help enterprises optimize team structures, adjust corporate social responsibility strategies, and maintain sustainable development in high-polluting sectors. Full article

The new energy industry has long benefited from government subsidies in China. However, the effectiveness of subsidies as a policy tool to guide sustainable development and competition has been widely debated. This paper examines the impact of subsidy policies on the firm value of new energy companies from 2011 to 2018. Initially, we employed data envelopment analysis (DEA) to calculate corporate subsidy performance (CSP). Additionally, we investigated the impact of disclosure transparency on the relationship between government subsidies and firm value. We confirmed the significant negative impacts of subsidies and disclosure on firm value through robustness tests and sensitivity analysis. Furthermore, when considering ownership issues, we found negative impacts on firm value for state-owned firms. In contrast, privately-held firms demonstrated a positive influence on firm value. This study highlights the policy implications of subsidy effectiveness, accurate information disclosure, and corporate social responsibility on the sustainable development of subsidies in the new energy industry. Full article

A growing number of companies are issuing corporate social responsibility (CSR) reports to publicize their commitment to sustainable development. However, skepticism remains among stakeholders about firms’ CSR information, which could hinder the success of worldwide CSR campaigns. Our paper examines mechanisms of how CSR disclosure resonates with stakeholders and influences their attitudes towards firms. Extending the current knowledge of CSR signaling effects, this paper provides a framework illustrating the interplay between CSR signaling properties and readers’ sensemaking processes, thereby predicting how corporate reputation is shaped through CSR communication. In order to test our theoretical hypotheses, a survey was conducted on 53 firms with 1521 respondents. The results show that the better the readers’ comprehension of a CSR report is, the stronger the signals of authenticity and corporate social performance (CSP) they perceive, the better the report value and value fit are recognized, and eventually, the more trust they hold for the firm. The relationship between comprehension of CSR reports and trust is partially mediated by the signaling-sensemaking process. Our research contributes to the literature on micro-foundations of strategic CSR by applying signaling theory in the context of CSR disclosure. The research findings have practical implications for firms’ CSR disclosure strategies. Full article

This study investigates the influence of corporate sustainability performance (CSP) on firm value through investment efficiency. By applying a panel regression analysis using a large sample of 26,838 firm-year observations that represent 9218 Asian listed companies over the period of 2012–2019, we illustrate that high corporate sustainability performance (CSP) increases investment efficiency. This result coincides with both stakeholder theory and information asymmetry theory where economic, environmental, social, and governance involvements play a fundamental role in improving firm value. Our results further show that the social dimension significantly improves investment decisions, unlike dimensions associated with environment and governance, which show no significant effect on investment efficiency. These insights about the impact of CSP on investment decisions will be useful to stakeholders, decision-makers, policymakers, as well as academics to improve their awareness of the importance of corporate sustainability practices. Particularly, the positive relationship between the social dimension of CSP and investment efficiency should motivate managers to improve their corporate social responsibility policy formation and implementation, and the management of investment portfolios in enhancing firm value. Full article

Green credit policy (GCP), as one of the key financial instruments to achieve ’carbon peaking’ and ‘carbon neutrality’ targets, provides capital support for the green development of enterprises. This paper explores the impact mechanism of GCP on the sustainability performance of heavily polluting enterprises (HPEs) from the perspectives of technological innovation level (TIL) and credit resource allocation (CRA), using panel data for Chinese A-share listed manufacturing companies from 2010 to 2015 to construct a propensity score matching and differences-in-differences (PSM-DID) model. We find that GCP has a causal effect on corporate sustainability performance (CSP). Although GCP significantly improves CSP, there is no long-term effect. Heterogeneity analysis shows that the relationship between GCP and CSP is only significant in non-state-owned enterprises and in eastern and low-market-concentration enterprises. Mechanism tests indicate that GCP stimulates HPEs to invest more in technological innovation and thereby improves CSP through the innovation compensation effect; the credit constraint and information transfer effects caused by GCP reduce the credit resources available to HPEs but have a significant forced effect on CSP. This paper enriches the study of the economic consequences of GCP and provides implications for stakeholders to improve the green financial system and achieve green transformation of HPEs. Full article

This study examined differing attributes that motivate corporate sustainability practices and performance (CSP&P) in the global economy. Utilizing publicly disclosed information from the Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP), data were gathered for publicly listed companies operating in high carbon-intensive and less carbon-intensive sectors on a global scale, and a panel ordered probit regression model analysis was conducted to arrive at the findings. The rigorous reliability and validity of the scales were ensured. Firm-level attributes, industry-specific factors, stakeholder pressure, and country-level attributes were the variables examined for each context. The findings reveal that the firm-level attributes showed that board size, board independence, sustainability committee, and firm size were linked to positive motivation, while firm age was found to negatively influence the response level. The study discovered that the industry-specific factors variable has a negative significant influence because industry leaders (firms in high carbon-intensive sectors) exhibit poor sustainability performance, suggesting a negative attitude towards environmental issues. The study discovered a positive and highly significant influence of stakeholder pressure, while country-level attributes partially played a significant role. Overall, the findings show that a disparity exists in the level of response between the different global economies. The justification for the findings is based on the theory of interested parties, political theory, and legitimacy concerns that shape the strategic choices made by companies. Full article

There are two opposite views about corporate sustainability in the existing literature. Sustainability activities are considered as a source of long-term value creation for the shareholders’ interest whereas they also occupy scarce corporate resources and become an extra burden at the expense of shareholders. To examine these contradictory views, this study investigated the value relevance of CSP using a sample of 113 firms belonging to twelve (12) highly sustainable economies as ranked by the Global Sustainability Competiveness Index for the period 2015–2020. The CSP was measured through a Sustainability Index (SI) developed in this study using the GRI framework which takes into account all the three dimensions of sustainability, i.e., economic, environmental, and social. The results of the study showed that CSP significantly explains the variation in stock market prices and hence is value relevant in supporting the shareholders’ value-enhancing role of corporate sustainability. The results are useful for practitioners and policy makers in the field of corporate sustainability. Full article

The growth of passive and socially responsible (SR) investment makes that sustainability indices play an important role in defining what constitutes a sustainable investment. In order to know the suitability of sustainability indices as benchmarks for SR investors, we used different linear regressions to compare the compositions of sustainability indices and their conventional counterparts and to compare the levels of corporate social responsibility (CSR) of both types of indices. We showed that the composition of sustainability indices gradually converged towards their conventional peers. Moreover, the difference between the CSR levels of both type of indices remained the same or even decreased over time. We concluded that a change in the weighting method of sustainability indices such as the equally weighted criterion would significantly increase the difference from their conventional counterparts. However, due to the relationship between CSR and size, this change would penalize the CSR level of the index. These results raise the question of whether SR passive investors will be able to meet their non-financial expectations as a consequence of the convergence. Full article

In recent years, we have witnessed dramatic changes in the following two regards: First, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) practices have become ubiquitous in companies, and second, the challenge that Sustainable Development (SD) presents to society and to the planet has been illustrated in the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). In this context, this study aims to identify the extent to which companies address the SDGs through their CSR practices. We conducted the present research by first performing a content analysis to determine the communalities between CSR practices and the SDGs. Then, we performed a quantitative analysis to assess the performance of various companies in terms of common aspects of CSR and SDGs. The main findings are as follows: (1) Not all SDGs are related to CSR practices; (2) companies perform differently in their CSR practices and, consequently, make different contributions to the SDGs; and (3) there is little difference among company profiles regarding their performances in CSR practices towards the SDGs. The main contributions of this study are, first, that it provides a new perspective on the relationship between CSR and SD and, second, the creation of a list of what can be considered the minimum requirements for CSR practices if the SDGs are to be reached. Full article