Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (7)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = C1 lateral mass screw

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
10 pages, 3728 KiB  
Technical Note
Cervical Lateral Mass and Pedicle Fracture Reduced with a Herbert Screw: A Technical Note
by Antonio Colamaria, Francesco Carbone, Augusto Leone, Giuseppe Palmieri, Savino Iodice, Bianca Maria Baldassarre, Giovanni Cirrottola, Valeria Ble, Uwe Spetzger and Giuseppe Di Perna
Med. Sci. 2025, 13(3), 92; https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci13030092 - 19 Jul 2025
Viewed by 327
Abstract
Background: Traumatic fractures of the cervical spine pose significant challenges in management, particularly in young patients, where preserving mobility is crucial. Patient Characteristics: A 30-year-old woman presented with a C3 lateral mass and pedicle fracture following a motor vehicle collision. Initial conservative management [...] Read more.
Background: Traumatic fractures of the cervical spine pose significant challenges in management, particularly in young patients, where preserving mobility is crucial. Patient Characteristics: A 30-year-old woman presented with a C3 lateral mass and pedicle fracture following a motor vehicle collision. Initial conservative management with a rigid cervical collar for three months failed to reduce the diastasis, and the debilitating neck pain worsened. Preoperative imaging confirmed fracture instability without spinal cord compression. Intervention and Outcome: Preoperative screw trajectory planning was conducted with the My Spine MC system (Medacta), and fine-tuning was achieved on a 3D-printed model of the vertebra. A posterior midline approach was employed to expose the C3 vertebra, and a Herbert screw was inserted under fluoroscopic guidance. Imaging at three months demonstrated significant fracture reduction and early bone fusion. The patient achieved substantial improvement in functional mobility without complications. Conclusion: Herbert screw fixation holds potential as a less-invasive alternative to conventional posterior stabilization for selected cervical fractures. This technical note provides the reader with the required information to support surgical planning and execution. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 2519 KiB  
Article
Mechanical Stability and Clinical Outcomes Following Posterior Cervical Fusion Surgery Using C3-6 Lateral Mass Screw Fixation: En Bloc Versus Regional Screw Fixation
by Dong-Ho Lee, Sang Yun Seok, Woon Sang Lee, Hyung Rae Lee, Sehan Park, Chang Ju Hwang and Jae Hwan Cho
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(4), 1185; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14041185 - 11 Feb 2025
Viewed by 1052
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Although lateral mass screws lower the risk of vertebral artery injury, they are shorter and have a weaker purchase than a pedicle screw, thereby posing the risk of mechanical failure following a ≥3-level posterior cervical fusion (PCF). Therefore, the purpose of [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Although lateral mass screws lower the risk of vertebral artery injury, they are shorter and have a weaker purchase than a pedicle screw, thereby posing the risk of mechanical failure following a ≥3-level posterior cervical fusion (PCF). Therefore, the purpose of this study is to demonstrate that the posterior en bloc fusion of C2-7 is mechanically stronger than shorter, regionally confined posterior fusions of the cervical spine. Methods: We included 178 patients who underwent PCF with ≥3 levels. Patients who underwent PCF that included both C2 and C7 were classified as the en bloc fusion group (EBF group, n = 116), while PCF cases not including these levels were assigned to a regional fusion group (RF group, n = 62). The fusion rate, incidences of mechanical failure, and clinical outcomes were evaluated using univariate analysis between the two groups. Results: The fusion rate was significantly higher in the EBF group than in the RF group (p = 0.038). In contrast, the mechanical failure rate was significantly lower in the EBF group (8/116 [6.9%] vs. 16/62 [25.8%], p = 0.047). Although the ROM was significantly higher in the RF group (p < 0.001), the functional scores did not significantly differ between the two groups. Conclusions: EBF seems to lower the rate of mechanical failure, as well as similar clinical outcomes, compared to RF. When the possibility of mechanical failure is high after PCF, extending the fusion level to C2 and C7 could be considered to minimize mechanical failure, rather than stopping at C3 or C6. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Spinal Disorders: Current Treatment and Future Opportunities: Part II)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 16298 KiB  
Case Report
Challenges in Diagnosis and Management of Atlantoaxial Tuberculosis: A Case Report
by Chiu-Chun Chen, Chi-Ruei Li, Hsi-Kai Tsou, Ting-Hsien Kao and Ruei-Hong Lin
Medicina 2025, 61(2), 224; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61020224 - 26 Jan 2025
Viewed by 1477
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Atlantoaxial tuberculosis (TB) is rare, and its diagnosis is difficult. Herein, we present a rare case with a challenging diagnostic journey of atlantoaxial TB spanning over two years. Materials and Methods: A 70-year-old immunocompetent female patient presented with [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Atlantoaxial tuberculosis (TB) is rare, and its diagnosis is difficult. Herein, we present a rare case with a challenging diagnostic journey of atlantoaxial TB spanning over two years. Materials and Methods: A 70-year-old immunocompetent female patient presented with a four-week history of nuchal pain, stiffness, and headache. She did not have any TB-associated constitutional symptoms. The result of the initial biopsy indicated only a nonfermenting Gram-negative bacillus and the histopathological report revealed concurrent acute and chronic inflammation. Posterior fusion with bilateral C1 lateral mass and C2 transpedicular screw fixation was performed after a five-week course of antibiotics. Results: However, the atlantoaxial abscess progressed and led to myelopathy two years later. Tuberculous spondylitis was not confirmed until the second biopsy. We chose the transoral approach for prompt abscess evacuation and to prevent unnecessary damage to the nearby vital neurovascular structures. The sputum culture and chest radiograph did not reveal concurrent pulmonary TB. Conclusions: Spinal TB has a greater likelihood of presenting with a cold abscess without the typical constitutional symptoms of pulmonary TB. Distinctive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features, such as a thin and smooth abscess wall, subligamentous spread, severe vertebral body destruction, and heterogenous vertebral wall enhancement, might help to differentiate between tuberculous and pyogenic spondylitis. We hope to offer meaningful insights to clinicians facing similar intricate scenarios, including subtle clues that may lead to a quicker diagnosis and the considerations we made while designing a treatment plan. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Neurology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 3214 KiB  
Review
A C-Arm-Free Minimally Invasive Technique for Spinal Surgery: Cervical and Thoracic Spine
by Masato Tanaka, Konstantinos Zygogiannnis, Naveen Sake, Shinya Arataki, Yoshihiro Fujiwara, Takuya Taoka, Thiago Henrique de Moraes Modesto and Ioannis Chatzikomninos
Medicina 2023, 59(10), 1779; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59101779 - 6 Oct 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 3171
Abstract
Background and Objectives: C-arm-free MIS techniques can offer significantly reduced rates of postoperative complications such as inadequate decompression, blood loss, and instrumentation misplacement. Another advantageous long-term aspect is the notably diminished exposure to radiation, which is known to cause malignant changes. This [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: C-arm-free MIS techniques can offer significantly reduced rates of postoperative complications such as inadequate decompression, blood loss, and instrumentation misplacement. Another advantageous long-term aspect is the notably diminished exposure to radiation, which is known to cause malignant changes. This study emphasizes that, in some cases of spinal conditions that require a procedural intervention, C-arm-free MIS techniques hold stronger indications than open surgeries guided by image intensifiers. Materials and Methods: This study includes a retrospective analysis and review of various cervical and thoracic spinal procedures, performed in our hospital, applying C-arm-free techniques. The course of this study explains the basic steps of the procedures and demonstrates postoperative and intraoperative results. For anterior cervical surgery, we performed OPLL resection, while for posterior cervical surgery, we performed posterior fossa decompression for Chiari malformation, minimally invasive cervical pedicle screw fixation (MICEPS), and modified Goel technique with C1 lateral mass screw for atlantoaxial subluxation. Regarding the thoracic spine, we performed anterior correction for Lenke type 5 scoliosis and transdiscal screw fixation for diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis fractures. Results: C-arm-free techniques are safe procedures that provide precise and high-quality postoperative results by offering sufficient spine alignment and adequate decompression depending on the case. Navigation can offer significant assistance in the absence of normal anatomical landmarks, yet the surgeon should always appraise the quality of the information received from the software. Conclusions: Navigated C-arm-free techniques are safe and precise procedures implemented in the treatment of surgically demanding conditions. They can significantly increase accuracy while decreasing operative time. They represent the advancement in the field of spine surgery and are hailed as the future of the same. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 3169 KiB  
Article
Assessment of Biomechanical Advantages in Combined Anterior–Posterior Cervical Spine Surgery by Radiological Outcomes: Pedicle Screws over Lateral Mass Screws
by Sang-Ho Kim, Ji-hyeon Kim, Ji-Won Kwon, Hak-Sun Kim, Seong-Hwan Moon, Kyung-Soo Suk and Byung-Ho Lee
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(9), 3201; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12093201 - 29 Apr 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2330
Abstract
Background: The combined anterior–posterior approach has shown good clinical outcomes for multilevel cervical diseases. This work describes the biomechanical advantage of cervical-pedicle-screw fixation over lateral-mass-screw fixation in combined anterior–posterior cases. Method: Seventy-six patients who received combined cervical surgery from June 2013 to December [...] Read more.
Background: The combined anterior–posterior approach has shown good clinical outcomes for multilevel cervical diseases. This work describes the biomechanical advantage of cervical-pedicle-screw fixation over lateral-mass-screw fixation in combined anterior–posterior cases. Method: Seventy-six patients who received combined cervical surgery from June 2013 to December 2020 were included. The patients were divided into two groups: the lateral-mass-screw group (LMS) and the pedicle-screw group (PPS). Radiological outcomes were assessed with lateral cervical spine X-rays for evaluating sagittal alignment, subsidence, and bone remodeling. Results: At 1 year postoperatively, the numbers of patients whose C2–C7 cervical lordosis was less than 20 degrees decreased by more in the PPS group (p-value = 0.001). The amount of vertical-length change from immediately to 1 year postsurgery was less in the PPS group than in the LMS group (p-value = 0.030). The mean vertebral-body-width change was larger in the PPS group than in the LMS group during 3 months to 1 year postsurgery (p-value = 0.000). Conclusions: In combined anterior–posterior cervical surgery cases, maintenance of cervical lordosis and protection of the vertebral body from subsidence were better with the pedicle-screw fixation. More bone remodeling occurred when using the pedicle-screw fixation method. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Challenges and Advances in Cervical Spine Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 3426 KiB  
Technical Note
Innovative C-Arm-Free Navigation Technique for Posterior Spinal Fixation for Atlantoaxial Subluxation: A Technical Note
by Masato Tanaka, Naveen Sake, Dae-Geun Kim, Shinya Arataki, Dhvanit Desai, Yoshihiro Fujiwara and Taro Yamauchi
Medicina 2023, 59(1), 11; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59010011 - 20 Dec 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 5464
Abstract
Study design: Technical note. Objectives: To present a novel C-arm-free technique guided by navigation to insert and place a C1 lateral mass screw. Background and Objectives: Atlantoaxial subluxation (AAS) is a relatively common sequelae in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) [...] Read more.
Study design: Technical note. Objectives: To present a novel C-arm-free technique guided by navigation to insert and place a C1 lateral mass screw. Background and Objectives: Atlantoaxial subluxation (AAS) is a relatively common sequelae in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and upper cervical trauma. If they present with severe symptoms, surgical intervention such as posterior fusion is indicated. The established treatment for AAS is fixation with a C1 lateral mass screw and C2 pedicle screw (modified Goel technique) to achieve bony fusion. However, this technique requires fluoroscopy for C1 screw insertion. To avoid exposing the operating team to radiation, we present here a novel C-arm-free C1 lateral mass screw insertion technique for AAS. Materials and Methods: A 67-year-old man was referred to our hospital with neck pain, quadriparesis, and clumsiness and numbness of both upper and lower limbs. He had undergone C3–6 posterior fusion previously in another hospital. In physical examination, he had severe muscle weakness of bilateral upper limbs and hypoesthesia of all four limbs. He had hyper-reflexia of bilateral lower limbs and pollakiuria. His Japanese orthopedic score was 8 points out of 17. Preoperative radiograms showed AAS with an atlantodental interval (ADI) of 7 mm. MRI indicated retro-odontoid pseudotumor and severe spinal cord compression at the C1–2 level. The patient underwent posterior atlantoaxial fixation under navigation guidance. To prevent epidural bleeding during the insertion and placement of a C1 lateral mass screw, we have here defined a novel screw insertion technique. Results: The surgical time was clocked as 127 min and blood loss was 100 mL. There were no complications per-operatively or in the postoperative period. The patient showed almost full recovery (JOA 16/17) at two months follow-up and a solid bony fusion was noticed in the radiograms at one year follow-up. Conclusions: This novel surgical procedure and C1 lateral mas screw placement technique is a practical and safe method in recent advances of AAS treatment. Procedurally, the technique helps prevent epidural bleeding from the screw entry point and also allows for proper C1 screw insertion under navigation guidance without exposing surgeons and staff to the risk of fluoroscopic radiation. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 33196 KiB  
Article
Biomechanical Comparison of Posterior Fixation Combinations with an Allograft Spacer between the Lateral Mass and Pedicle Screws
by Soo-Bin Lee, Hwan-Mo Lee, Tae-Hyun Park, Sung Jae Lee, Young-Woo Kwon, Seong-Hwan Moon and Byung Ho Lee
Appl. Sci. 2020, 10(20), 7291; https://doi.org/10.3390/app10207291 - 19 Oct 2020
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 3476
Abstract
Background: There are a few biomechanical studies that describe posterior fixation methods with pedicle screws (PS) and lateral mass screws (LMS); the combination of both screw types and their effect on an allograft spacer in a surgically treated cervical segment is unknown. Methods: [...] Read more.
Background: There are a few biomechanical studies that describe posterior fixation methods with pedicle screws (PS) and lateral mass screws (LMS); the combination of both screw types and their effect on an allograft spacer in a surgically treated cervical segment is unknown. Methods: Finite element model (FEM) analyses were used to investigate the effects of a hybrid technique using posterior PS and LMS. Stress distribution and subsidence risk from a combination of screws under hybrid motion control conditions, including flexion, extension, axial rotation, and lateral bending, were investigated to evaluate the biomechanical characteristics of different six-screw combinations. Findings: The load sharing on the allograft spacer in flexion mode was highest in the LMS model (74.6%) and lowest in the PS model (35.1%). The likelihood of subsidence of allograft spacer on C6 was highest in the screws from the distal LMS (type 5) model during flexion and extension (4.902 MPa, 30.1% and 2.189 MPa, 13.4%). In lateral bending, the left unilateral LMS (type 4) model screws on C5 (3.726 MPa, 22.9%) and C6 (2.994 MPa, 18.4%) yielded the greatest subsidence risks, because the lateral bending forces were supported by the LMS. In counterclockwise axial rotation, the left unilateral LMS (type 4) model screws on C5 (3.092 MPa, 19.0%) and C6 (3.076 MPa, 18.9%) demonstrated the highest subsidence risks. Conclusion: The asymmetrical ipsilateral use of LMS and posterior PS in lateral bending and axial rotation demonstrated the lowest stability and greatest subsidence risk. We recommend bilateral symmetrical insertion of LMS or posterior PS and posterior PS on distal vertebrae for increased stability and reduced risk of allograft spacer subsidence. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop