Search Results (90)

Barrett’s esophagus (BE), a metaplastic transformation of an esophageal squamous epithelium into an intestinal-type columnar epithelium, is the primary precursor to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Traditional management strategies have relied heavily on selective screening, tailored surveillance intervals, and early dysplasia detection and treatment algorithms. However, the heterogeneity in progression risk among BE patients necessitates a more nuanced, personalized approach involving precision care, tailoring decisions to individual patient characteristics, promises to enhance outcomes in BE through more targeted screening, personalized surveillance intervals, and risk-based therapeutic strategies. This review explores the current landscape and emerging trends in precision medicine for Barrett’s esophagus, highlighting genomic markers, digital pathology, and AI-driven models as tools to transform how we approach this complex disease and prevent progression to EAC. Full article

Background and Aims: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is the most common esophageal disorder worldwide and a progressive condition leading to Barrett’s esophagus and adenocarcinoma. Continuous medical therapy with proton pump inhibitors fails to restore the antireflux barrier and is unable to relieve symptoms in up to 40% of patients. A tailored and standardized antireflux surgical procedure may increase cure rates and meet patient expectations. Methods and Results: Antireflux surgery aims to reestablish the natural antireflux barrier, which includes the diaphragmatic crura, the lower esophageal sphincter (LES), and the angle of His along with the gastroesophageal flap valve. For decades, the Nissen total fundoplication has been the primary procedure and remains the gold standard for surgical treatment. Alternatives such as Toupet partial fundoplication, Dor partial fundoplication, and the magnetic sphincter augmentation (LINX™) procedure have been developed to mitigate side effects like dysphagia, gas-bloat syndrome, and the inability to belch or vomit. Recent clinical findings regarding a novel procedure, RefluxStop™, indicate that restoring the gastroesophageal flap valve, in conjunction with anterior fundoplication and a silicone device for stabilizing the LES beneath the diaphragm, can achieve lasting reflux control and enhance patient-reported outcomes. Conclusions: The planning of healthcare services and actionable strategies to improve equity and quality of treatment is critical to address the global burden of GERD. Modern laparoscopic surgery for GERD is safe and effective and should be performed in centers offering a complete diagnostic pathway and specific surgical techniques tailored to the individual GERD phenotype. Shared decision-making between the surgeon and the patient is essential for the choice of operation. A personalized approach can offer clinical benefits over total fundoplication and improve patient-reported outcomes. Full article

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is associated with inflammatory and neoplastic changes in the esophageal epithelium. Despite widespread PPI use, esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) incidence continues to rise, implicating non-acidic reflux components such as pepsin in disease progression. We performed transcriptomic profiling to assess pepsin-induced changes and the protective effect of amprenavir in vitro. Het-1A (normal) and BAR-T (Barrett’s) cells (n = 3) were treated at pH 7.0 with pepsin and/or 10 μM amprenavir for 1 h. RNA-seq identified DEGs (FDR ≤ 0.05, |log₂FC| ≥ 0.375), and Ingenuity Pathway Analysis revealed enriched pathways. Pepsin exposure altered mitochondrial function, oxidative phosphorylation, epithelial integrity, signaling, and inflammatory pathways in both cell lines. Amprenavir attenuated these transcriptomic perturbations, preserving mitochondrial and stress-response pathways. Notably, BAR-T cells exhibited heightened activation of wound-healing and epithelial repair pathways, whereas Het-1A cells showed greater mitochondrial and systemic stress pathway alterations. Pepsin drives transcriptomic dysregulation in esophageal epithelial cells under non-acidic conditions, and amprenavir shows potential to counteract peptic injury. Further studies are needed to validate these findings and explore amprenavir’s therapeutic utility in GERD management and EAC prevention. Full article

The gut microbiota significantly impacts the development and progression of upper gastrointestinal (GI) cancers, including esophageal and gastric cancers. Microbial dysbiosis contributes to carcinogenesis through mechanisms such as inflammation, immune modulation, and direct DNA damage. Techniques for sampling oral, esophageal, and gastric microbiota vary, with standardization being essential for reliable results. Barrett’s esophagus (BE) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) are associated with an enrichment of Gram-negative bacteria, promoting inflammation and cancer progression. Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) also shows distinct microbial patterns, with reduced diversity and increased harmful bacteria like Porphyromonas gingivalis and Fusobacterium nucleatum. In gastric cancer (GC), Helicobacter pylori (HP) and non-HP gastric microbiota play significant roles, with diverse microbial communities contributing to cancer development through nitrate reduction, immune modulation, and inflammation. Emerging evidence highlights the role of non-HP bacteria in promoting carcinogenesis, with specific taxa like Fusobacterium nucleatum and Lactobacillus influencing tumor growth and immune evasion. Further research is needed to elucidate the complex interactions between gut microbiota and upper GI cancers, paving the way for novel diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. Understanding these microbial dynamics offers potential for microbiota-based interventions, improving the early detection, prognosis, and treatment of upper GI cancers. This comprehensive review summarizes the available evidence on the role of microbiota in upper GI oncology and the need for continued exploration in this field. Full article

Esophageal cancer, primarily comprising the squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and adenocarcinoma (EAC) subtypes, is the sixth leading cause of cancer deaths globally. In addition to many well-established endogenous and exogenous risk factors, there is emerging evidence for the etiologic role of infectious agents in esophageal cancer, although these associations are incompletely understood. Here, we review the currently available literature on the relationship between infectious agents and esophageal cancer. By far, human papilloma virus (HPV), particularly HPV 16 and 18, have the strongest etiologic association with ESCC. Less robust is the association of high-risk HPV (hr-HPV) with EAC. Although H. pylori has been implicated in the development of EAC via increased acid reflux, decreased lower esophageal sphincter tone, and the resultant Barrett’s metaplasia–dysplasia–adenocarcinoma pathway, some hypothesize based on epidemiological trends that H. pylori may in fact be a protective factor. In rare cases, EBV can cause esophageal lymphoepithelial carcinoma. Several other agents including HSV, polyomaviruses, and Candida are associated with esophageal cancer to varying degrees. In summary, while several studies, including those conflicting with each other, implicate several infectious agents, the evidence is weak, at best. Clearly, further work is needed to help solidify clear etiologies that will help facilitate prevention and treatment. Full article

Background: Barrett’s esophagus (BE) is a known precursor to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). However, reports on incidence and progression-to-neoplasm rates have been very variable and conflicting. The aims of the study were to evaluate the characteristics of BE and its progression to neoplasm in a large homogeneous population. Methods: This was a retrospective population-based study with patients identified from 11 institutions through the databases in two centralized pathology laboratories. Demographics and relevant clinicopathological features were obtained from medical records among patients with a pathologically confirmed BE by the presence of intestinal metaplasia between 2003 and 2022. Results: A total of 1388 patients were identified with BE: 948 were men (69%); the median age at diagnosis was 62 years (IQR, 53–72). The ratio of long-segment BE to short-segment BE was significantly higher in patients ≥ 60 years (1.15, 284/248) than those ≤ 60 years (0.77, 205/265) (p = 0.0025). At BE diagnosis, 9.4% had neoplasms: LGD (n = 65), HGD (n = 16), and EAC (n = 49). Among 1258 non-dysplastic BE (NDBE) patients, 4.6% developed a neoplasm—LGD (n = 35), HGD (n = 8), and EAC (n = 15)—with a median observation-period of 5 years (IQR, 3–7). Overall, 160 cases with neoplasms were diagnosed in this BE cohort; 130 (74%) were present at initial BE diagnosis, and 58 (26%) progressed to neoplasms from NDBE. Conclusions: The ratio of long-segment BE was found to be significantly higher in patients ≥ 60 years. Around 9% of the patients were diagnosed as harboring a neoplasm concomitantly with BE, accounting for approximately 74% of all neoplasms. After a median follow-up of 5 years, about 5% of BE showed dysplastic or malignant progression. Full article

Background/Objectives: Esophageal cancer (EC) represents a major global contributor to cancer-related mortality. The advent of artificial intelligence (AI), including machine learning, deep learning, and radiomics, holds promise for enhancing treatment decisions and predicting outcomes. The aim of this review is to present an overview of the current landscape and future perspectives of AI in the management of EC. Methods: A literature search was performed on MEDLINE using the following keywords: “Artificial Intelligence”, “Esophageal cancer”, “Barrett’s esophagus”, “Esophageal Adenocarcinoma”, and “Esophageal Squamous cell carcinoma”. All titles and abstracts were screened; the results included 41 studies. Results: Over the past five years, the number of studies focusing on the application of AI to the treatment and prognosis of EC has surged, leveraging increasingly larger datasets with external validation. The simultaneous incorporation in AI models of clinical factors and features from several imaging modalities displays improved predictive performance, which may enhance patient outcomes, based on direct personalized therapeutic options. However, clinicians and researchers must address existing limitations, conduct randomized controlled trials, and consider the ethical and legal aspects that arise to establish AI as a standard decision-support tool. Conclusions: AI applications may result in substantial advances in EC management, heralding a new era. Considering the complexity of EC as a clinical entity, the evolving potential of AI is anticipated to ameliorate patients’ quality of life and survival rates. Full article

Background: Barrett’s esophagus (BE) is described by the transformation of the normal squamous epithelium into metaplastic columnar epithelium, driven by chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). BE is a recognized premalignant condition and the main precursor to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying BE carcinogenesis is crucial for improving prevention, surveillance, and treatment strategies. Methods: This narrative review examines the molecular abnormalities associated with the progression of BE to EAC. Results: This study highlights inflammatory, genetic, epigenetic, and chromosomal alterations, emphasizing key pathways and biomarkers. BE progression follows a multistep process involving dysplasia and genetic alterations such as TP53 and CDKN2A (p16) mutations, chromosomal instability, and dysregulation of pathways like PI3K/AKT/mTOR. Epigenetic alterations, including aberrant microRNA expression or DNA methylation, further contribute to this progression. These molecular changes are stage-specific, with some alterations occurring early in BE during the transition to high-grade dysplasia or EAC. Innovations in chemoprevention, such as combining proton pump inhibitors and aspirin, and the potential of antireflux surgery to halt disease progression are promising. Incorporating molecular biomarkers into surveillance strategies and advancing precision medicine may enable earlier detection and personalized treatments. Conclusions: BE is the primary preneoplastic condition for EAC. A deeper understanding of its molecular transformation can enhance surveillance protocols, optimize the management of gastroesophageal reflux inflammation, and refine prevention and therapeutic strategies, ultimately contributing to a reduction in the global burden of EAC. Full article

Background: Barrett’s esophagus (BE), with metaplastic columnar epithelium in the lower esophagus, predisposes patients to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Despite extensive research, mechanisms underlying BE progression to EAC remain unclear, and no validated biomarkers are available for clinical use. Progastricsin/Pepsinogen-C (PGC), an aspartic proteinase linked to maintaining normal epithelial morphology, is often absent in advanced gastrointestinal malignancies. This study comprehensively investigates PGC expression across cancers, particularly in esophageal cancer (ESCA), to clarify its role in BE progression to EAC. Methods: We utilized multiple bioinformatic platforms (TIMER, UALCAN, cBioPortal, GEPIA, STRING, Metascape, and GEO database) to assess PGC expression, genomic alterations, and correlations with clinicopathological features, survival, and immune infiltration. Additionally, using the GEO dataset, we compared non-dysplastic Barrett’s esophagus (NDBE) patients with those who progressed to malignancy, identifying differentially expressed genes (DEGs), their interactions, and potential roles in progression. Results: PGC was notably upregulated in various cancers, especially in adjacent normal tissues of ESCA. Genomic amplifications of PGC were linked to improved survival in EAC patients, particularly those with high PGC expression, suggesting a protective role. Moreover, PGC expression positively correlated with favorable immune infiltration, notably B cells and CD8+ T cells. Enrichment analysis of downregulated DEGs revealed significant involvement in key biological processes, specifically in extracellular matrix organization. Among the downregulated DEGs, we identified PGC among the top 10 hub genes, underscoring its role in tissue homeostasis. Conclusions: These findings suggest that PGC could serve as a promising biomarker for predicting the high-risk transformation from BE to EAC, offering new insights into EAC progression and future therapeutic targets. Full article

Background: Barrett’s Esophagus (BE) is the only known precursor for esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Patients with multiple risk factors for BE/EAC are recommended for screening; however, few eligible patients undergo evaluation by endoscopy. EsoGuard^® (EG) is a commercially available biomarker assay used to analyze esophageal cells collected non-endoscopically with EsoCheck^® (EC) for the qualitative detection of BE/EAC. This study evaluates the real-world clinical utility of EG on cells collected with EC in patients defined by U.S. gastroenterology societies to be at-risk for BE and EAC. Methods: This multi-center, observational CLinical Utility of EsoGuard (CLUE) study enrolled screening-eligible patients as defined by the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) and the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA). Clinical utility was evaluated by the provider decision impact of EG and additionally by assessing patient compliance outcomes with recommended follow-up testing. Results: There were 551 patients enrolled, with a mean age of 62.0 ± 12.4 years and 56.1% (309/551) meeting ACG guideline criteria for BE screening. EC cell collection was successful in 97.1% (535/551), among which the EG positivity rate was 27.3% (n = 146). The provider decision impact was high, with 100% of EG-positive patients being referred for esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), while 98% of EG negative patients were not referred. Among the EG-positive patients, the overall compliance with follow-up EGD was 85.4%. Conclusions: Combining EC non-endoscopic esophageal cell collection with the EG biomarker assay is effective in guiding provider decision-making for the detection of BE and EAC. Patients with positive EG results demonstrate high compliance with recommended follow-up EGD. Full article

Barrett’s esophagus (BE) is a common precancerous lesion that can progress to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). There are significant alterations in the esophageal microbiome in the progression from healthy esophagus to BE to EAC, including an increased abundance of a variety of lactate-producing bacteria and an increase of lactate in the tumor microenvironment, as predicted by metabolic modeling. The role of bacterial lactate in EAC is unknown. Here, we utilize patient-derived organoid (PDO) models of EAC and demonstrate that lactate inhibits the growth and proliferation of EAC PDOs through alterations in the tumor NADH/NAD+ redox state. Further RNA sequencing of EAC PDOs identifies ID1 and RSAD2 as potential regulatory molecules crucial in mediating lactate’s ability to suppress glycolysis and proliferation. Gene ontology analysis also identifies the activation of inflammatory and immunological pathways in addition to alterations in the metabolic pathways in EAC PDOs exposed to lactate, suggesting a multi-faceted role for lactate in the pathogenesis of EAC. Full article

Esopredict^TM is a prognostic assay that risk-stratifies Barrett’s esophagus patients to predict future progression to high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Established based on foundational studies at Johns Hopkins University, a risk algorithm was developed and clinically validated in two independent studies (n = 320). Esopredict^TM is currently offered as a clinical test under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) guidelines. Here we present the analytical validation by repeated testing of FFPE tissues (n = 26 patients), cell lines, and contrived DNA controls to determine assay performance regarding analytical sensitivity (as defined by the limit of detection (LOD)), analytical specificity (as defined by the limit of blank (LOB)), accuracy as determined from the average positive and negative agreement, repeatability, and reproducibility. The LOD for the assay at 1.5% DNA methylation was significantly higher than the LOB, as determined by an unmethylated DNA control (0% methylated DNA). Inter- and intra-assay average positive agreement (APA) were 88% and 94%, respectively, while average negative agreement (ANA) values were 90% and 94%, respectively. Average inter- and intra-assay precision were <9% and <5% coefficient of variation (CV), respectively. These results confirm that Esopredict^TM is a highly reproducible, sensitive, and specific risk categorization assay for the prediction of progression to HGD or EAC within 5 years. Full article

Barrett’s esophagus (BE) is a known precursor to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Guidelines recommend BE screening in populations with multiple risk factors, for which non-endoscopic esophageal cell collection with biomarker testing is considered as an acceptable alternative to esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). The aim of this study was to evaluate analytical performance characteristics of EsoGuard^® (EG), a DNA methylation biomarker assay, as a laboratory-developed test (LDT) in esophageal samples collected with the swallowable EsoCheck^® (EC) device. EG is a next-generation sequencing (NGS) assay that evaluates methylated vimentin (VIM) and cyclin A1 (CCNA1), clinically validated biomarkers for the detection of BE and EAC. The studies were conducted according to standards of College of American Pathology (CAP), Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA), and New York (NY) state requirements for the analytical validation of molecular assays. Comparison to Sanger sequencing showed that EG was 100% accurate at all 31 CpG sites evaluated by the assay. The analytical sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the assay were 89%, 100%, and 96%, respectively. Intra- and inter-assay precision was 100%. The limit of detection (LOD) was 1 in 400 methylated cells, and the reference range was 84%. In summary, EsoGuard demonstrates high analytical accuracy, repeatability, and reproducibility in samples collected using the EsoCheck device. Full article

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one of the most common diseases that occurs secondary to failure of the antireflux barrier system, resulting in the frequent and abnormal reflux of gastric contents to the esophagus. GERD is diagnosed in routine clinical practice based on the classic symptoms of heartburn and regurgitation. However, a subset of patients with atypical symptoms can pose challenges in diagnosing GERD. An esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is the most common initial diagnostic test used in the assessment for GERD, although half of these patients will not have any positive endoscopic findings suggestive of GERD. The advanced endoscopic techniques have improved the diagnostic yield of GERD diagnosis and its complications, such as Barrett’s esophagus and early esophageal adenocarcinoma. These newer endoscopic tools can better detect subtle irregularities in the mucosa and vascular structures. The management options for GERD include lifestyle modifications, pharmacological therapy, and endoscopic and surgical interventions. The latest addition to the armamentarium is the minimally invasive endoscopic interventions in carefully selected patients, including the electrical stimulation of the LES, Antireflux mucosectomy, Radiofrequency therapy, Transoral Incisionless Fundoplication, Endoscopic Full-Thickness plication (GERDx™), and suturing devices. With the emergence of these advanced endoscopic techniques, it is crucial to understand their selection criteria, advantages, and disadvantages. Full article

Background: Barrett’s esophagus (BE) is a pre-neoplastic condition associated with an increased risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). The accurate diagnosis of BE and grading of dysplasia can help to optimize the management of patients with BE. However, BE may be missed and the accurate grading of dysplasia based on a routine histology has a considerable intra- and interobserver variability. Thus, well-defined biomarker testing remains indispensable. The aim of our study was to identify routinely applicable and relatively specific biomarkers for an accurate diagnosis of BE, as well as determining biomarkers to predict the risk of progression in BE–dysplasia. Methods: Retrospectively, we performed immunohistochemistry to test mucin 2(MUC2), trefoil factor 3 (TFF3), p53, p16, cyclin D1, Ki-67, beta-catenin, and minichromosome maintenance (MCM2) in biopsies. Prospectively, to identify chromosomal alterations, we conducted fluorescent in situ hybridization testing on fresh brush samples collected at the time of endoscopy surveillance. Results: We discovered that MUC2 and TFF3 are specific markers for the diagnosis of BE. Aberrant expression, including the loss and strong overexpression of p53, Ki-67, p16, beta-catenin, cyclin D1, and MCM2, was significantly associated with low-grade dysplasia (LGD), high-grade dysplasia (HGD), and EAC histology, with a relatively high risk of neoplastic changes. Furthermore, the aberrant expressions of p53 and p16 in BE-indefinite dysplasia (IND) progressor cohorts predicted the risk of progression. Conclusions: Assessing the biomarkers would be a suitable adjunct to accurate BE histology diagnoses and improve the accuracy of BE–dysplasia grading, thus reducing interobserver variability, particularly of LGD and risk prediction. Full article