Search Results (8)

Background: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have transformed antithrombotic therapy but carry significant bleeding risks requiring prompt reversal. Recent regulatory changes have altered the reversal landscape, notably with the withdrawal of andexanet alfa from the U.S. market. Anticoagulation stewardship programs (ASPs) are essential for navigating this evolving environment and optimizing safe use of anticoagulants. Methods: This narrative review synthesizes evidence from landmark clinical trials (RE-VERSE AD, ANNEXA-4, ANNEXA-I), contemporary guidelines, emerging literature on reversal agents, and critical regulatory updates including the 2025 U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA) withdrawal of andexanet alfa. Results: Idarucizumab remains the only FDA-approved specific antidote for dabigatran. Following the withdrawal of andexanet alfa, prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs), both 4-factor and activated are now the primary reversal options for Factor Xa inhibitors, with recent evidence demonstrating comparable hemostatic efficacy. Ciraparantag, a universal reversal agent, is currently in Phase III development. Effective ASPs must now adapt protocols to the post-andexanet era while ensuring timely access to alternative reversal strategies. Conclusions: The reversal landscape has undergone a fundamental transformation with the loss of andexanet alfa. Success in DOAC-associated bleeding management now depends on optimizing PCC-based strategies, integrating systematic stewardship approaches, and preparing for emerging universal antidotes. Institutions must urgently update algorithms, ensure PCC availability, and monitor outcomes in this new therapeutic environment. Full article

Background: Andexanet alfa is a specific antidote for factor Xa (FXa) inhibitors. It is licensed to treat patients under FXa inhibitor therapy with life-threatening bleeding. Concomitantly, volume expanders are used to compensate for blood loss and maintain circulation. The competitive binding of andexanet to FXa inhibitors may be disrupted due to hemodilution, as shown by laboratory assays with high sample dilution. This study investigated the efficacy of andexanet for the reversal of FXa inhibitors under hemodilution. Methods: Blood from 10 healthy volunteers was anticoagulated with rivaroxaban and subsequently treated with four different volume expanders (Ringer’s solution, 4% gelatine, 5% and 20% human albumin (HA)) at two dilution levels (20% and 50%). After anticoagulation and hemodilution, andexanet was added according to the high-dose protocol. Blood samples were analyzed using a Russell’s viper venom (RVV) test on a Clot Pro^® device, a thrombin generation assay, a fully automated coagulation analyzer and a chromogenic anti-FXa activity assay. Results: After anticoagulation, the median rivaroxaban concentration was 272 ng/mL (IQR 254–353). Anticoagulation with rivaroxaban caused a significant impairment of all coagulation parameters, which was further aggravated by hemodilution. After the administration of andexanet, coagulation parameters in anticoagulated samples were reversed to near baseline in all groups. Andexanet administration decreased the rivaroxaban plasma concentration in all groups to a median of <10 ng/mL. In the anticoagulated, non-hemodiluted samples, anti-FXa activity was reduced by 98%. The anti-FXa activity in the anticoagulated, hemodiluted samples was reduced by approximately 96% in the 20% diluted samples and by about 93% in the 50% diluted samples. Conclusions: Our data indicate that FXa inhibitor reversal with andexanet is about 5% less effective with 50% hemodilution than in non-hemodiluted samples. Full article

Background/Objectives: There are limited data on the risks and benefits of using Andexanet alfa (AA) compared with four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) for the reversal of factor Xa inhibitor-associated intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). Our aim was to describe a compilation of the information available in the literature to date. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched until December 2023. Following the “Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)” guidelines, our systematic literature review included studies that were retrospective in design and evaluated both drugs to control bleeding and complications (death and thromboembolic events). Two researchers re-examined the studies for relevance, extracted the data and assessed the risk of bias. No meta-analyses were performed for the results. Results: In this limited patient sample, we found no differences between published articles in terms of neuroimaging stability or thrombotic events. However, some studies show significant differences in mortality, suggesting that one of the AAs may be superior to 4F-PCC. Conclusions: Our qualitative analysis shows that AA has a better efficacy profile compared with 4F-PCC. However, further studies monitoring these patients and a multicenter collaborative network dedicated to this topic are needed. Full article

In clinical practice, the number of patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has consistently increased over the years. Since anticoagulant therapy has been associated with an annual incidence of major bleeding (MB) events of approximately 2% to 3.5%, it is of paramount importance to understand how to manage anticoagulated patients with major or life-threatening bleeding. A considerable number of these patients’ conditions necessitate hospitalization, and the administration of reversal agents may be imperative to manage and control bleeding episodes effectively. Importantly, effective strategies for reversing the anticoagulant effects of DOACs have been well recognized. Specifically, idarucizumab has obtained regulatory approval for the reversal of dabigatran, and andexanet alfa has recently been approved for reversing the effects of apixaban or rivaroxaban in patients experiencing life-threatening or uncontrolled bleeding events. Moreover, continuous endeavors are being made to develop supplementary reversal agents. In emergency scenarios where specific reversal agents might not be accessible, non-specific hemostatic agents such as prothrombin complex concentrate can be utilized to neutralize the anticoagulant effects of DOACs. However, it is paramount to emphasize that specific reversal agents, characterized by their efficacy and safety, should be the preferred choice when suitable. Moreover, it is worth noting that adherence to the guidelines for the reversal agents is poor, and there is a notable gap between international recommendations and actual clinical practices in this regard. This narrative review aims to provide physicians with a practical approach to managing specific reversal agents. Full article

In recent years, anticoagulant and antiplatelet use have increased over the past years for the prevention and treatment of several cardiovascular conditions. Due to the rising use of antithrombotic medications and the complexity of specific clinical cases requiring such therapies, bleeding remains the primary concern among patients using antithrombotics. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) include rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, and betrixaban. Direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) include argatroban, bivalirudin, and dabigatran. DOACs are associated with lower rates of fatal, life-threatening, and significant bleeding risks compared to those of warfarin. The immediate reversal of these agents can be indicated in an emergency setting. Antithrombotic reversal recommendations are still in development. Vitamin K and prothrombin complex concentrate (PCCs) can be used for warfarin reversal. Andexanet alfa and idarucizumab are specific reversal agents for DOACs and DTIs, respectively. Protamine sulfate is the solely approved reversal agent for unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). However, there are no specific reversal agents for antiplatelets. This article aims to provide a practical guide for clinicians regarding the reversal of anticoagulants and antiplatelets in clinical practice based on the most recent studies. Full article

Background: Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is associated with high mortality and morbidity, especially in patients under anticoagulative treatment. Andexanet alfa (AA) is a modified recombinant form of human factor Xa (FXa) developed for reversal of FXa-inhibitors, e.g., in the event of ICH, but experience is still limited. Methods: This monocentric retrospective observational cohort study included 46 patients with acute FXa-inhibitor-associated non-traumatic ICH (FXa-I-ICH) of whom 23 were treated with AA within 12 h after symptom onset, compared to 23 patients with usual care (UC). Volumetrically analyzed hematoma expansion (HE) in brain imaging, clinical outcome and incidence of adverse events were analyzed. Results: All patients (mean age 79.8 ± 7.2 years) were effectively anticoagulated. The cohort included severely ill patients with large hematoma volumes (median 20.4, IQR 7.8–39.0 mL). Efficacy, as assessed by HE in imaging, was very good in the AA-group. There was no (0.0%) relevant HE (>33%) in contrast to UC-group (26.1%). Nevertheless, we observed a high incidence of thromboembolic events (30.4% vs. 4.4%) and non-favorable outcomes (death/palliative condition) in 43.5% vs. 26.1%. Conclusions: There was no HE in the volumetric neuroimaging assessment in the AA-group, but clinical outcomes remained often worse. Large randomized trials for the use of AA in patients with acute FXa-inhibitor-associated ICH are needed to investigate the clinical outcome in consideration of the rates of thromboembolism. Full article

Specific antagonists have been developed for the reversal of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC). We investigated the impact of these reversal agents on the plasma concentration and visco-elastic test results of dabigatran and factor Xa inhibitors. After baseline measurements of dabigatran, the plasma concentration, and the visco-elastic ClotPro^® ecarin clotting time (ECA-CT), we added the reversal agent Idarucizumab in vitro and these two analyses were repeated. Likewise, the baseline plasma concentration of apixaban, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban as well as ClotPro^® Russell’s viper venom test clotting time (RVV-CT) were measured and reanalyzed following Andexanet alfa spiking. We analyzed fifty blood samples from 37 patients and 10 healthy volunteers. Idarucizumab decreased the measured dabigatran plasma concentration from 323.9 ± 185.4 ng/mL to 5.9 ± 2.3 ng/mL and ECA-CT from 706.2 ± 344.6 s to 70.6 ± 20.2 s, (all, p < 0.001). Andexanet alfa decreased the apixaban concentration from 165.1 ± 65.5 ng/mL to 9.8 ± 8.1 ng/mL, edoxaban from 152.4 ± 79.0 ng/mL to 36.4 ± 19.2 ng/mL, and rivaroxaban from 153.2 ± 111.8 ng/mL to 18.1 ± 9.1 ng/mL (all p < 0.001). Andexanet alfa shortened the RVV-CT of patients with apixaban from 239.2 ± 71.7 s to 151.1 ± 30.2 s, edoxaban from 288.2 ± 65.0 s to 122.7 ± 37.1 s, and rivaroxaban from 225.9 ± 49.3 s to 103.7 ± 12.1 s (all p < 0.001). In vitro spiking of dabigatran-containing blood with Idarucizumab substantially reduced the plasma concentration and ecarin-test clotting time. Andexanet alfa lowered the concentration of the investigated factor Xa-inhibitors but did not normalize the RVV-CT. In healthy volunteers’ blood, Idarucizumab spiking had no impact on ECA-CT. Andexanet alfa spiking of non-anticoagulated blood prolonged RVV-CT (p = 0.001), potentially as a consequence of a competitive antagonism with human factor Xa. Full article

Background: Over the last ten years, a new class of drugs, known as the direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs), have emerged at the forefront of anticoagulation therapy. Like the older generation anticoagulants, DOACs require specific reversal agents in cases of life-threatening bleeding or the need for high-risk surgery. Methods: Published literature was searched, and information extracted to provide an update on DOACS and their reversal agents. Results: The DOACs include the direct thrombin inhibitor—dabigatran, and the factor Xa inhibitors—rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, and betrixaban. These DOACs all have a rapid onset of action and each has a predictable therapeutic response requiring no monitoring, unlike the older anticoagulants, such as warfarin. Two reversal agents have been approved within the last five years: idarucizumab for the reversal of dabigatran, and andexanet alfa for the reversal of rivaroxaban and apixaban. Additionally, ciraparantag, a potential “universal” reversal agent, is currently under clinical development. Conclusions: A new generation of anticoagulants, the DOACs, and their reversal agents, are gaining prominence in clinical practice, having demonstrated superior efficacy and safety profiles. They are poised to replace traditional anticoagulants including warfarin. Full article