Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (10)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = ARDS subphenotypes

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
18 pages, 4058 KB  
Perspective
Clinical Phenotyping in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Steps Towards Personalized Medicine
by Paul Leon Petrick, Martin Mirus, Lars Heubner, Hani Harb, Mario Menk and Peter Markus Spieth
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(20), 7204; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14207204 - 13 Oct 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1305
Abstract
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a highly heterogeneous syndrome with a continuing high mortality rate. Despite intensive research, established therapies consist mainly of supportive measures, while pharmacological approaches have not yet shown any consistent survival benefits. In recent years, it has become [...] Read more.
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a highly heterogeneous syndrome with a continuing high mortality rate. Despite intensive research, established therapies consist mainly of supportive measures, while pharmacological approaches have not yet shown any consistent survival benefits. In recent years, it has become clear that the great clinical and biological diversity of ARDS contributes significantly to the difficulty of demonstrating therapeutic effects. The phenotyping of ARDS has therefore become a central field of research. Different approaches—from clinical parameters and imaging to inflammatory and cardiovascular profiles and multi-omics analyses—have repeatedly identified reproducible subphenotypes that differ in prognosis and, in some cases, in response to therapies. Hypo- and hyperinflammatory subphenotypes have been described as particularly consistent. These are prognostically relevant and, in retrospective analyses, have also shown a differentiated response to glucocorticoids, statins, or fluid strategies. However, endotypes based on causal pathophysiological mechanisms are still largely theoretical. The concept of treatable traits illustrates the potential of personalized therapy but is currently based predominantly on retrospective findings. Future studies should use standardized terminology and multimodal approaches, take longitudinal data into account, and aim for prospective validation to define robust subphenotypes and causal endotypes. This could lay the foundation for true precision medicine in ARDS. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Intensive Care)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 290 KB  
Perspective
ARDS Subphenotypes as a Guide to Therapy and Enrollment into Therapeutic Trials: Not So Fast
by Jesús Villar, Tamas Szakmany, Ognjen Gajic, Diego Casali, Sara Cazorla-Rivero and Alexander S. Niven
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(17), 6088; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14176088 - 28 Aug 2025
Viewed by 2107
Abstract
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a common and highly heterogeneous condition in the critically ill. The association between hyper- and hypo-inflammatory subphenotypes and clinical outcomes has generated significant interest in precise ARDS management. The value of identifying biomarkers to guide treatment and [...] Read more.
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a common and highly heterogeneous condition in the critically ill. The association between hyper- and hypo-inflammatory subphenotypes and clinical outcomes has generated significant interest in precise ARDS management. The value of identifying biomarkers to guide treatment and enrollment in future ARDS trials is undisputable. We describe multiple factors complicating the search for subphenotypes and their treatable traits. The observed heterogeneity seen in the clinical course of ARDS is dynamic and influenced by factors beyond lung pathophysiology, including variations in the delivery of best critical care practices, patient comorbidities, and functional status, and patient or family preferences. Current subphenotype definitions lack strong biological plausibility and without clear evidence of benefit from targeted treatments, their use in clinical practice is currently unwarranted. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Respiratory Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 1654 KB  
Review
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Pathophysiological Insights, Subphenotypes, and Clinical Implications—A Comprehensive Review
by Mairi Ziaka and Aristomenis Exadaktylos
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(15), 5184; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14155184 - 22 Jul 2025
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 15436
Abstract
Increased epithelial and endothelial permeability, along with dysregulated inflammatory responses, are key aspects of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) pathophysiology, which not only impact the lungs but also contribute to detrimental organ crosstalk with distant organs, ultimately leading to multiple organ dysfunction syndrome [...] Read more.
Increased epithelial and endothelial permeability, along with dysregulated inflammatory responses, are key aspects of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) pathophysiology, which not only impact the lungs but also contribute to detrimental organ crosstalk with distant organs, ultimately leading to multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS)—the primary cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with lung injury (LI) and ARDS. It is predominantly manifested by hypoxemic respiratory failure and bilateral pulmonary infiltrates, which cannot be fully attributed to cardiac failure or hypervolemia, but rather to alveolo-capillary barrier dysfunction, dysregulated systemic and pulmonary inflammation, immune system abnormalities, and mechanical stimuli-related responses. However, these pathological features are not uniform among patients with ARDS, as distinct subphenotypes with unique biological, clinical, physiological, and radiographic characteristics have been increasingly recognized in recent decades. The severity of ARDS, clinical outcomes, mortality, and efficacy of applied therapeutic measures appear significant depending on the respective phenotype. Acknowledging the heterogeneity of ARDS and defining distinct subphenotypes could significantly modify therapeutic strategies, enabling more precise and targeted treatments. To address these issues, a comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed using predefined keywords related to ARDS pathophysiology, subphenotypes, and personalized therapeutic approaches. Optimizing the identification and characterization of discrete ARDS subphenotypes—based on clinical, biological, physiological, and radiographic criteria—will deepen our understanding of ARDS pathophysiology, promote targeted recruitment in prospective clinical studies to define patient clusters with heterogeneous therapeutic responses, and support the shift toward individualized treatment strategies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ventilation in Critical Care Medicine: 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 2207 KB  
Review
Personalized Respiratory Support in ARDS: A Physiology-to-Bedside Review
by Salvatore Lucio Cutuli, Domenico Luca Grieco, Teresa Michi, Melania Cesarano, Tommaso Rosà, Gabriele Pintaudi, Luca Salvatore Menga, Ersilia Ruggiero, Valentina Giammatteo, Giuseppe Bello, Gennaro De Pascale and Massimo Antonelli
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(13), 4176; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12134176 - 21 Jun 2023
Cited by 18 | Viewed by 6994
Abstract
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a leading cause of disability and mortality worldwide, and while no specific etiologic interventions have been shown to improve outcomes, noninvasive and invasive respiratory support strategies are life-saving interventions that allow time for lung recovery. However, the [...] Read more.
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a leading cause of disability and mortality worldwide, and while no specific etiologic interventions have been shown to improve outcomes, noninvasive and invasive respiratory support strategies are life-saving interventions that allow time for lung recovery. However, the inappropriate management of these strategies, which neglects the unique features of respiratory, lung, and chest wall mechanics may result in disease progression, such as patient self-inflicted lung injury during spontaneous breathing or by ventilator-induced lung injury during invasive mechanical ventilation. ARDS characteristics are highly heterogeneous; therefore, a physiology-based approach is strongly advocated to titrate the delivery and management of respiratory support strategies to match patient characteristics and needs to limit ARDS progression. Several tools have been implemented in clinical practice to aid the clinician in identifying the ARDS sub-phenotypes based on physiological peculiarities (inspiratory effort, respiratory mechanics, and recruitability), thus allowing for the appropriate application of personalized supportive care. In this narrative review, we provide an overview of noninvasive and invasive respiratory support strategies, as well as discuss how identifying ARDS sub-phenotypes in daily practice can help clinicians to deliver personalized respiratory support and potentially improve patient outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Insights into Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

15 pages, 972 KB  
Review
Cardiovascular Subphenotypes in ARDS: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Implications and Overlap with Other ARDS Subphenotypes
by Minesh Chotalia, Jaimin M. Patel, Mansoor N. Bangash and Dhruv Parekh
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(11), 3695; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12113695 - 26 May 2023
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 3829
Abstract
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a highly heterogeneous clinical condition. Shock is a poor prognostic sign in ARDS, and heterogeneity in its pathophysiology may be a barrier to its effective treatment. Although right ventricular dysfunction is commonly implicated, there is no consensus [...] Read more.
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a highly heterogeneous clinical condition. Shock is a poor prognostic sign in ARDS, and heterogeneity in its pathophysiology may be a barrier to its effective treatment. Although right ventricular dysfunction is commonly implicated, there is no consensus definition for its diagnosis, and left ventricular function is neglected. There is a need to identify the homogenous subgroups within ARDS, that have a similar pathobiology, which can then be treated with targeted therapies. Haemodynamic clustering analyses in patients with ARDS have identified two subphenotypes of increasingly severe right ventricular injury, and a further subphenotype of hyperdynamic left ventricular function. In this review, we discuss how phenotyping the cardiovascular system in ARDS may align with haemodynamic pathophysiology, can aid in optimally defining right ventricular dysfunction and can identify tailored therapeutic targets for shock in ARDS. Additionally, clustering analyses of inflammatory, clinical and radiographic data describe other subphenotypes in ARDS. We detail the potential overlap between these and the cardiovascular phenotypes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Respiratory Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 1120 KB  
Review
Challenges in ARDS Definition, Management, and Identification of Effective Personalized Therapies
by Denise Battaglini, Brigitta Fazzini, Pedro Leme Silva, Fernanda Ferreira Cruz, Lorenzo Ball, Chiara Robba, Patricia R. M. Rocco and Paolo Pelosi
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(4), 1381; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12041381 - 9 Feb 2023
Cited by 59 | Viewed by 35630
Abstract
Over the last decade, the management of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has made considerable progress both regarding supportive and pharmacologic therapies. Lung protective mechanical ventilation is the cornerstone of ARDS management. Current recommendations on mechanical ventilation in ARDS include the use of [...] Read more.
Over the last decade, the management of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has made considerable progress both regarding supportive and pharmacologic therapies. Lung protective mechanical ventilation is the cornerstone of ARDS management. Current recommendations on mechanical ventilation in ARDS include the use of low tidal volume (VT) 4–6 mL/kg of predicted body weight, plateau pressure (PPLAT) < 30 cmH2O, and driving pressure (∆P) < 14 cmH2O. Moreover, positive end-expiratory pressure should be individualized. Recently, variables such as mechanical power and transpulmonary pressure seem promising for limiting ventilator-induced lung injury and optimizing ventilator settings. Rescue therapies such as recruitment maneuvers, vasodilators, prone positioning, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal have been considered for patients with severe ARDS. Regarding pharmacotherapies, despite more than 50 years of research, no effective treatment has yet been found. However, the identification of ARDS sub-phenotypes has revealed that some pharmacologic therapies that have failed to provide benefits when considering all patients with ARDS can show beneficial effects when these patients were stratified into specific sub-populations; for example, those with hyperinflammation/hypoinflammation. The aim of this narrative review is to provide an overview on current advances in the management of ARDS from mechanical ventilation to pharmacological treatments, including personalized therapy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Insights into Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 2523 KB  
Article
Differential Protein Expression among Two Different Ovine ARDS Phenotypes—A Preclinical Randomized Study
by Karin Wildi, Mahe Bouquet, Carmen Ainola, Samantha Livingstone, Sebastiano Maria Colombo, Silver Heinsar, Noriko Sato, Kei Sato, Emily Wilson, Gabriella Abbate, Margaret R. Passmore, Kieran Hyslop, Keibun Liu, Gianluigi Li Bassi, Jacky Y. Suen and John F. Fraser
Metabolites 2022, 12(7), 655; https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo12070655 - 15 Jul 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2328
Abstract
Despite decades of comprehensive research, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) remains a disease with high mortality and morbidity worldwide. The discovery of inflammatory subphenotypes in human ARDS provides a new approach to study the disease. In two different ovine ARDS lung injury models, [...] Read more.
Despite decades of comprehensive research, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) remains a disease with high mortality and morbidity worldwide. The discovery of inflammatory subphenotypes in human ARDS provides a new approach to study the disease. In two different ovine ARDS lung injury models, one induced by additional endotoxin infusion (phenotype 2), mimicking some key features as described in the human hyperinflammatory group, we aim to describe protein expression among the two different ovine models. Nine animals on mechanical ventilation were included in this study and were randomized into (a) phenotype 1, n = 5 (Ph1) and (b) phenotype 2, n = 4 (Ph2). Plasma was collected at baseline, 2, 6, 12, and 24 h. After protein extraction, data-independent SWATH-MS was applied to inspect protein abundance at baseline, 2, 6, 12, and 24 h. Cluster analysis revealed protein patterns emerging over the study observation time, more pronounced by the factor of time than different injury models of ARDS. A protein signature consisting of 33 proteins differentiated among Ph1/2 with high diagnostic accuracy. Applying network analysis, proteins involved in the inflammatory and defense response, complement and coagulation cascade, oxygen binding, and regulation of lipid metabolism were activated over time. Five proteins, namely LUM, CA2, KNG1, AGT, and IGJ, were more expressed in Ph2. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Using Metabolomics to Subphenotype Disease and Therapeutic Response)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 885 KB  
Review
The Inflammatory Lung Microenvironment; a Key Mediator in MSC Licensing
by Hazel Dunbar, Daniel J Weiss, Sara Rolandsson Enes, John G Laffey and Karen English
Cells 2021, 10(11), 2982; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10112982 - 2 Nov 2021
Cited by 24 | Viewed by 5195
Abstract
Recent clinical trials of mesenchymal stromal cell (MSC) therapy for various inflammatory conditions have highlighted the significant benefit to patients who respond to MSC administration. Thus, there is strong interest in investigating MSC therapy in acute inflammatory lung conditions, such as acute respiratory [...] Read more.
Recent clinical trials of mesenchymal stromal cell (MSC) therapy for various inflammatory conditions have highlighted the significant benefit to patients who respond to MSC administration. Thus, there is strong interest in investigating MSC therapy in acute inflammatory lung conditions, such as acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Unfortunately, not all patients respond, and evidence now suggests that the differential disease microenvironment present across patients and sub-phenotypes of disease or across disease severities influences MSC licensing, function and therapeutic efficacy. Here, we discuss the importance of licensing MSCs and the need to better understand how the disease microenvironment influences MSC activation and therapeutic actions, in addition to the need for a patient-stratification approach. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cell Therapy for Lung Disease)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 839 KB  
Article
Comparisons of Outcomes between Patients with Direct and Indirect Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Receiving Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
by Li-Chung Chiu, Li-Pang Chuang, Shih-Wei Lin, Hsin-Hsien Li, Shaw-Woei Leu, Ko-Wei Chang, Chi-Hsien Huang, Tzu-Hsuan Chiu, Huang-Pin Wu, Feng-Chun Tsai, Chung-Chi Huang, Han-Chung Hu and Kuo-Chin Kao
Membranes 2021, 11(8), 644; https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11080644 - 22 Aug 2021
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 3968
Abstract
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a heterogeneous syndrome caused by direct (local damage to lung parenchyma) or indirect lung injury (insults from extrapulmonary sites with acute systemic inflammatory response), the clinical and biological complexity can have a profound effect on clinical outcomes. [...] Read more.
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a heterogeneous syndrome caused by direct (local damage to lung parenchyma) or indirect lung injury (insults from extrapulmonary sites with acute systemic inflammatory response), the clinical and biological complexity can have a profound effect on clinical outcomes. We performed a retrospective analysis of 152 severe ARDS patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Our objective was to assess the differences in clinical characteristics and outcomes of direct and indirect ARDS patients receiving ECMO. Overall hospital mortality was 53.3%. A total of 118 patients were assigned to the direct ARDS group, and 34 patients were assigned to the indirect ARDS group. The 28-, 60-, and 90-day hospital mortality rates were significantly higher among indirect ARDS patients (all p < 0.05). Cox regression models demonstrated that among direct ARDS patients, diabetes mellitus, immunocompromised status, ARDS duration before ECMO, and SOFA score during the first 3 days of ECMO were independently associated with mortality. In indirect ARDS patients, SOFA score and dynamic compliance during the first 3 days of ECMO were independently associated with mortality. Our findings revealed that among patients receiving ECMO, direct and indirect subphenotypes of ARDS have distinct clinical outcomes and different predictors for mortality. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Strategies and Concepts of Extracorporeal Life Support (ECLS))
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 2672 KB  
Article
Identification of a Circulating miRNA Signature to Stratify Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Patients
by Gennaro Martucci, Antonio Arcadipane, Fabio Tuzzolino, Giovanna Occhipinti, Giovanna Panarello, Claudia Carcione, Eleonora Bonicolini, Chiara Vitiello, Roberto Lorusso, Pier Giulio Conaldi and Vitale Miceli
J. Pers. Med. 2021, 11(1), 15; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm11010015 - 27 Dec 2020
Cited by 15 | Viewed by 3745
Abstract
There is a need to improve acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) diagnosis and management, particularly with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), and different biomarkers have been tested to implement a precision-focused approach. We included ARDS patients on veno-venous (V-V) ECMO in a prospective observational [...] Read more.
There is a need to improve acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) diagnosis and management, particularly with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), and different biomarkers have been tested to implement a precision-focused approach. We included ARDS patients on veno-venous (V-V) ECMO in a prospective observational pilot study. Blood samples were obtained before cannulation, and screened for the expression of 754 circulating microRNA (miRNAs) using high-throughput qPCR and hierarchical cluster analysis. The miRNet database was used to predict target genes of deregulated miRNAs, and the DIANA tool was used to identify significant enrichment pathways. A hierarchical cluster of 229 miRNAs (identified after quality control screening) produced a clear separation of 11 patients into two groups: considering the baseline SAPS II, SOFA, and RESP score cluster A (n = 6) showed higher severity compared to cluster B (n = 5); p values < 0.05. After analysis of differentially expressed miRNAs between the two clusters, 95 deregulated miRNAs were identified, and reduced to 13 by in silico analysis. These miRNAs target genes implicated in tissue remodeling, immune system, and blood coagulation pathways. The blood levels of 13 miRNAs are altered in severe ARDS. Further investigations will have to match miRNA results with inflammatory biomarkers and clinical data. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop