Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (8)

Search Parameters:
Authors = Fabrizio Albarello ORCID = 0000-0001-5115-709X

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
9 pages, 1123 KiB  
Case Report
A Case of Pulmonary Fibrosis and COVID-19-Related Pneumonia in a Pembrolizumab-Treated Patient
by Alberto Zolezzi, Gina Gualano, Annelisa Mastrobattista, Pietro Vittozzi, Virginia Di Bari, Carlotta Cerva, Silvia Mosti, Antonio Lugini, Fabrizio Albarello, Federica Di Stefano, Maria Beatrice Valli and Fabrizio Palmieri
Infect. Dis. Rep. 2025, 17(3), 53; https://doi.org/10.3390/idr17030053 - 12 May 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 829
Abstract
Pembrolizumab is used as a first-line treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Pneumonitis and interstitial lung disease are among the most common immune-related adverse events. The impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections on patients with cancer treated with chemotherapy [...] Read more.
Pembrolizumab is used as a first-line treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Pneumonitis and interstitial lung disease are among the most common immune-related adverse events. The impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections on patients with cancer treated with chemotherapy or immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is not fully known. Blocking immune checkpoints may conversely augment dysfunctional T-cell responses in severe patients and, in turn, mediate immunopathology. Here, we present a case of SARS-CoV-2 infection complicated by acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and a fibrotic-like pattern in a patient treated with pembrolizumab for lung cancer. The patient showed a dramatic clinical and radiological response after steroid therapy. Further research is needed to better understand the long-term implications of pembrolizumab therapy in patients recovering from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and to develop evidence-based guidelines for managing these complex cases. Patients undergoing oncologic immunotherapy might benefit from early high-dose steroid treatment in cases of viral infections, such as SARS-CoV-2. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Infections in the Immuncompromised Host)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1964 KiB  
Article
Stage-Specific Immune Responses to AgB T-Peptides in Patients with Cystic Echinococcosis
by Settimia Sbarra, Ambra Vola, Francesca Tamarozzi, Saeid Najafi-Fard, Alessandra Ludovisi, Antonella Teggi, Emanuele Nicastri, Fabrizio Albarello, Enrico Brunetti, Delia Goletti and Linda Petrone
Infect. Dis. Rep. 2025, 17(3), 51; https://doi.org/10.3390/idr17030051 - 7 May 2025
Viewed by 765
Abstract
Background: The identification of parasite- and stage-specific antigens is crucial for the development of new diagnostic tests for cystic echinococcosis (CE). We previously analysed the interleukin (IL)-4 response to T-specific peptides corresponding to the immunogenic regions of the five antigen B (AgB) subunits, [...] Read more.
Background: The identification of parasite- and stage-specific antigens is crucial for the development of new diagnostic tests for cystic echinococcosis (CE). We previously analysed the interleukin (IL)-4 response to T-specific peptides corresponding to the immunogenic regions of the five antigen B (AgB) subunits, demonstrating that AgB1 is the most immunogenic protein and that the response to all AgB peptides is associated with viable cysts. However, the response in patients with CE3a (WHO-IWGE) cystic stage was not evaluated and no other immunological factors besides IL-4 were included in the analysis. Methods: Four study groups were defined: “CE3a group” (transitional cysts), “CE3b group” (active cysts), “CE4/CE5 group” (inactive cysts), and “NO CE-group” encompassing patients with non-CE cysts (controls). Whole blood was stimulated in vitro with the five different T-specific peptide pools corresponding to the five AgB subunits and with a pool containing all five peptides’ pools (total pool). IL-4 and other immunological markers were evaluated by ELISA and a multiplex assay, respectively. Results: Twenty-four patients with CE (CE3a-group n = 3; CE3b-group n = 6; CE4/CE5-group n = 15) and 14 subjects with non-CE cysts were enrolled. IL-4 levels in response to AgB1 and AgB3 pools were significantly increased in CE compared to NO CE groups (p = 0.0201, p = 0.0041). Within the CE patients, the highest IL-4 median level was observed in response to the AgB total pool, the AgB3 and AgB4 pools, followed by the AgB1 pool. Moreover, the IL-4 levels in response to the AgB1 pool were found to be significantly higher in the CE3b group compared to the CE4/CE5 group (p = 0.0070), while no differences were found for the CE3a group. As for other cytokines, we found higher IL-7 levels in response to the AgB4 pool in the CE4/CE5 group compared to the CE3b group (p = 0.0012), higher IL-2 levels in response to the AgB1 pool and AgB total pool in CE3b patients compared to controls (p = 0.0016), and higher IL-13 levels in response to the AgB total pool in patients with CE3b and CE4/CE5 cysts compared to NO CE (p = 0.0016; p = 0.0009). Conclusions: These results contribute to a better knowledge of the immune interplay in the presence of CE and may be useful for further exploring the use of recombinant proteins/peptides in cytokine release assays for the diagnosis and follow-up of CE. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Parasitological Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

8 pages, 1482 KiB  
Case Report
Diagnosis of Tuberculosis in a Case of Chronic Urticaria following Omalizumab Therapy
by Alberto Zolezzi, Gina Gualano, Maria A. Licata, Silvia Mosti, Paola Mencarini, Roberta Papagni, Antonella Vulcano, Angela Cannas, Alberta Villanacci, Fabrizio Albarello, Franca Del Nonno, Daniele Colombo and Fabrizio Palmieri
Antibiotics 2023, 12(12), 1655; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12121655 - 24 Nov 2023
Viewed by 2008
Abstract
In Italy, tuberculosis (TB) incidence in the last decade has remained constant at under 10 cases/100,000 inhabitants. In the Philippines, TB annual incidence is greater than 500 cases/100,000 inhabitants. Omalizumab is a humanized anti-IgE monoclonal antibody approved for the treatment of chronic spontaneous [...] Read more.
In Italy, tuberculosis (TB) incidence in the last decade has remained constant at under 10 cases/100,000 inhabitants. In the Philippines, TB annual incidence is greater than 500 cases/100,000 inhabitants. Omalizumab is a humanized anti-IgE monoclonal antibody approved for the treatment of chronic spontaneous urticaria. We report the case of a 32-year-old Filipino woman who suffered from chronic urticaria, treated with topic steroids since June 2022 and systemic steroids for 2 weeks. In November 2022, she started omalizumab therapy at a monthly dose of 300 mg; she was not screened for TB infection. In the same month, a left laterocervical lymphadenopathy arose, which worsened in February 2023 (diameter: 3 cm). The patient recovered in April 2023 in INMI “Lazzaro Spallanzani” in Rome for suspected TB. Chest CT showed a “tree in bud” pattern at the upper-right pulmonary lobe. The patient tested positive for lymph node biopsy molecular tuberculosis. The patient started standard antituberculosis therapy. She discontinued omalizumab. To our knowledge, this is the second diagnosed TB case during omalizumab treatment, which suggests that attention should be paid to the known risk of TB during biotechnological treatments. Even if current guidelines do not recommend screening for TB before starting anti-IgE therapy, further data should be sought to assess the relationship between omalizumab treatment and active TB. Our experience suggests that screening for TB should be carried out in patients from highly tuberculosis-endemic countries before starting omalizumab therapy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antibiotics and Infectious Respiratory Diseases, 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 12168 KiB  
Article
Imaging Severity COVID-19 Assessment in Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Patients: Comparison of the Different Variants in a High Volume Italian Reference Center
by Vincenza Granata, Roberta Fusco, Alberta Villanacci, Simona Magliocchetti, Fabrizio Urraro, Nardi Tetaj, Luisa Marchioni, Fabrizio Albarello, Paolo Campioni, Massimo Cristofaro, Federica Di Stefano, Nicoletta Fusco, Ada Petrone, Vincenzo Schininà, Francesca Grassi, Enrico Girardi and Stefania Ianniello
J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12(6), 955; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12060955 - 10 Jun 2022
Cited by 15 | Viewed by 3226
Abstract
Purpose: To analyze the vaccine effect by comparing five groups: unvaccinated patients with Alpha variant, unvaccinated patients with Delta variant, vaccinated patients with Delta variant, unvaccinated patients with Omicron variant, and vaccinated patients with Omicron variant, assessing the “gravity” of COVID-19 pulmonary involvement, [...] Read more.
Purpose: To analyze the vaccine effect by comparing five groups: unvaccinated patients with Alpha variant, unvaccinated patients with Delta variant, vaccinated patients with Delta variant, unvaccinated patients with Omicron variant, and vaccinated patients with Omicron variant, assessing the “gravity” of COVID-19 pulmonary involvement, based on CT findings in critically ill patients admitted to Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Methods: Patients were selected by ICU database considering the period from December 2021 to 23 March 2022, according to the following inclusion criteria: patients with proven Omicron variant COVID-19 infection with known COVID-19 vaccination with at least two doses and with chest Computed Tomography (CT) study during ICU hospitalization. Wee also evaluated the ICU database considering the period from March 2020 to December 2021, to select unvaccinated consecutive patients with Alpha variant, subjected to CT study, consecutive unvaccinated and vaccinated patients with Delta variant, subjected to CT study, and, consecutive unvaccinated patients with Omicron variant, subjected to CT study. CT images were evaluated qualitatively using a severity score scale of 5 levels (none involvement, mild: ≤25% of involvement, moderate: 26–50% of involvement, severe: 51–75% of involvement, and critical involvement: 76–100%) and quantitatively, using the Philips IntelliSpace Portal clinical application CT COPD computer tool. For each patient the lung volumetry was performed identifying the percentage value of aerated residual lung volume. Non-parametric tests for continuous and categorical variables were performed to assess statistically significant differences among groups. Results: The patient study group was composed of 13 vaccinated patients affected by the Omicron variant (Omicron V). As control groups we identified: 20 unvaccinated patients with Alpha variant (Alpha NV); 20 unvaccinated patients with Delta variant (Delta NV); 18 vaccinated patients with Delta variant (Delta V); and 20 unvaccinated patients affected by the Omicron variant (Omicron NV). No differences between the groups under examination were found (p value > 0.05 at Chi square test) in terms of risk factors (age, cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, immunosuppression, chronic kidney, cardiac, pulmonary, neurologic, and liver disease, etc.). A different median value of aerated residual lung volume was observed in the Delta variant groups: median value of aerated residual lung volume was 46.70% in unvaccinated patients compared to 67.10% in vaccinated patients. In addition, in patients with Delta variant every other extracted volume by automatic tool showed a statistically significant difference between vaccinated and unvaccinated group. Statistically significant differences were observed for each extracted volume by automatic tool between unvaccinated patients affected by Alpha variant and vaccinated patients affected by Delta variant of COVID-19. Good statistically significant correlations among volumes extracted by automatic tool for each lung lobe and overall radiological severity score were obtained (ICC range 0.71–0.86). GGO was the main sign of COVID-19 lesions on CT images found in 87 of the 91 (95.6%) patients. No statistically significant differences were observed in CT findings (ground glass opacities (GGO), consolidation or crazy paving sign) among patient groups. Conclusion: In our study, we showed that in critically ill patients no difference were observed in terms of severity of disease or exitus, between unvaccinated and vaccinated patients. The only statistically significant differences were observed, with regard to the severity of COVID-19 pulmonary parenchymal involvement, between unvaccinated patients affected by Alpha variant and vaccinated patients affected by Delta variant, and between unvaccinated patients with Delta variant and vaccinated patients with Delta variant. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cancer Challenges during COVID-19 Pandemic)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 2537 KiB  
Article
Incidence of Pneumothorax and Pneumomediastinum in 497 COVID-19 Patients with Moderate–Severe ARDS over a Year of the Pandemic: An Observational Study in an Italian Third Level COVID-19 Hospital
by Nardi Tetaj, Gabriele Garotto, Fabrizio Albarello, Annelisa Mastrobattista, Micaela Maritti, Giulia Valeria Stazi, Maria Cristina Marini, Ilaria Caravella, Manuela Macchione, Giada De Angelis, Donatella Busso, Rachele Di Lorenzo, Silvana Scarcia, Anna Farina, Daniele Centanni, Joel Vargas, Martina Savino, Alessandro Carucci, Andrea Antinori, Fabrizio Palmieri, Gianpiero D’Offizi, Stefania Ianniello, Fabrizio Taglietti, Paolo Campioni, Francesco Vaia, Emanuele Nicastri, Enrico Girardi, Luisa Marchioni and ICU COVID-19 Study Groupadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(23), 5608; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10235608 - 29 Nov 2021
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 3321
Abstract
(1) Background: COVID-19 is a novel cause of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Indeed, with the increase of ARDS cases due to the COVID-19 pandemic, there has also been an increase in the incidence of cases with pneumothorax (PNX) and pneumomediastinum (PNM). However, [...] Read more.
(1) Background: COVID-19 is a novel cause of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Indeed, with the increase of ARDS cases due to the COVID-19 pandemic, there has also been an increase in the incidence of cases with pneumothorax (PNX) and pneumomediastinum (PNM). However, the incidence and the predictors of PNX/PMN in these patients are currently unclear and even conflicting. (2) Methods: The present observational study analyzed the incidence of barotrauma (PNX/PNM) in COVID-19 patients with moderate–severe ARDS hospitalized in a year of the pandemic, also focusing on the three waves occurring during the year, and treated with positive-pressure ventilation (PPV). We collected demographic and clinical data. (3) Results: During this period, 40 patients developed PNX/PNM. The overall incidence of barotrauma in all COVID-19 patients hospitalized in a year was 1.6%, and in those with moderate–severe ARDS in PPV was 7.2% and 3.8 events per 1000 positive-pressure ventilator days. The incidence of barotrauma in moderate–severe ARDS COVID-19 patients during the three waves was 7.8%, 7.4%, and 8.7%, respectively. Treatment with noninvasive respiratory support alone was associated with an incidence of barotrauma of 9.1% and 2.6 events per 1000 noninvasive ventilator days, of which 95% were admitted to the ICU after the event, due to a worsening of respiratory parameters. The incidence of barotrauma of ICU COVID-19 patients in invasive ventilation over a year was 5.8% and 2.7 events per 1000 invasive ventilator days. There was no significant difference in demographics and clinical features between the barotrauma and non-barotrauma group. The mortality was higher in the barotrauma group (17 patients died, 47.2%) than in the non-barotrauma group (170 patients died, 37%), although this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.429). (4) Conclusions: The incidence of PNX/PNM in moderate–severe ARDS COVID-19 patients did not differ significantly between the three waves over a year, and does not appear to be very different from that in ARDS patients in the pre-COVID era. The barotrauma does not appear to significantly increase mortality in COVID-19 patients with moderate–severe ARDS if protective ventilation strategies are applied. Attention should be paid to the risk of barotrauma in COVID-19 patients in noninvasive ventilation because the event increases the probability of admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) and intubation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Infectious Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 1560 KiB  
Article
Quantitative Analysis of Residual COVID-19 Lung CT Features: Consistency among Two Commercial Software
by Vincenza Granata, Stefania Ianniello, Roberta Fusco, Fabrizio Urraro, Davide Pupo, Simona Magliocchetti, Fabrizio Albarello, Paolo Campioni, Massimo Cristofaro, Federica Di Stefano, Nicoletta Fusco, Ada Petrone, Vincenzo Schininà, Alberta Villanacci, Francesca Grassi, Roberta Grassi and Roberto Grassi
J. Pers. Med. 2021, 11(11), 1103; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm11111103 - 28 Oct 2021
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 3098
Abstract
Objective: To investigate two commercial software and their efficacy in the assessment of chest CT sequelae in patients affected by COVID-19 pneumonia, comparing the consistency of tools. Materials and Methods: Included in the study group were 120 COVID-19 patients (56 women and 104 [...] Read more.
Objective: To investigate two commercial software and their efficacy in the assessment of chest CT sequelae in patients affected by COVID-19 pneumonia, comparing the consistency of tools. Materials and Methods: Included in the study group were 120 COVID-19 patients (56 women and 104 men; 61 years of median age; range: 21–93 years) who underwent chest CT examinations at discharge between 5 March 2020 and 15 March 2021 and again at a follow-up time (3 months; range 30–237 days). A qualitative assessment by expert radiologists in the infectious disease field (experience of at least 5 years) was performed, and a quantitative evaluation using thoracic VCAR software (GE Healthcare, Chicago, Illinois, United States) and a pneumonia module of ANKE ASG-340 CT workstation (HTS Med & Anke, Naples, Italy) was performed. The qualitative evaluation included the presence of ground glass opacities (GGOs) consolidation, interlobular septal thickening, fibrotic-like changes (reticular pattern and/or honeycombing), bronchiectasis, air bronchogram, bronchial wall thickening, pulmonary nodules surrounded by GGOs, pleural and pericardial effusion, lymphadenopathy, and emphysema. A quantitative evaluation included the measurements of GGOs, consolidations, emphysema, residual healthy parenchyma, and total lung volumes for the right and left lung. A chi-square test and non-parametric test were utilized to verify the differences between groups. Correlation coefficients were used to analyze the correlation and variability among quantitative measurements by different computer tools. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed. Results: The correlation coefficients showed great variability among the quantitative measurements by different tools when calculated on baseline CT scans and considering all patients. Instead, a good correlation (≥0.6) was obtained for the quantitative GGO, as well as the consolidation volumes obtained by two tools when calculated on baseline CT scans, considering the control group. An excellent correlation (≥0.75) was obtained for the quantitative residual healthy lung parenchyma volume, GGO, consolidation volumes obtained by two tools when calculated on follow-up CT scans, and for residual healthy lung parenchyma and GGO quantification when the percentage change of these volumes were calculated between a baseline and follow-up scan. The highest value of accuracy to identify patients with RT-PCR positive compared to the control group was obtained by a GGO total volume quantification by thoracic VCAR (accuracy = 0.75). Conclusions: Computer aided quantification could be an easy and feasible way to assess chest CT sequelae due to COVID-19 pneumonia; however, a great variability among measurements provided by different tools should be considered. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cancer Challenges during COVID-19 Pandemic)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1354 KiB  
Article
Management of Spontaneous Bleeding in COVID-19 Inpatients: Is Embolization Always Needed?
by Pascale Riu, Fabrizio Albarello, Federica Di Stefano, Alessandra Vergori, Alessandra D’Abramo, Carlo Cerini, Martina Nocioni, Maurizio Morucci, Nardi Tetaj, Massimo Cristofaro, Vincenzo Schininà, Paolo Campioni, Ada Petrone, Nicoletta Fusco, Luisa Marchioni, Andrea Antinori, Emanuele Nicastri, Roberto Cianni and Stefania Ianniello
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(18), 4119; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10184119 - 12 Sep 2021
Cited by 17 | Viewed by 3663
Abstract
Background: critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection present a hypercoagulable condition. Anticoagulant therapy is currently recommended to reduce thrombotic risk, leading to potentially severe complications like spontaneous bleeding (SB). Percutaneous transcatheter arterial embolization (PTAE) can be life-saving in critical patients, in addition to [...] Read more.
Background: critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection present a hypercoagulable condition. Anticoagulant therapy is currently recommended to reduce thrombotic risk, leading to potentially severe complications like spontaneous bleeding (SB). Percutaneous transcatheter arterial embolization (PTAE) can be life-saving in critical patients, in addition to medical therapy. We report a major COVID-19 Italian Research Hospital experience during the pandemic, with particular focus on indications and technique of embolization. Methods: We retrospectively included all subjects with SB and with a microbiologically confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, over one year of pandemic, selecting two different groups: (a) patients treated with PTAE and medical therapy; (b) patients treated only with medical therapy. Computed tomography (CT) scan findings, clinical conditions, and biological findings were collected. Results: 21/1075 patients presented soft tissue SB with an incidence of 1.95%. 10/21 patients were treated with PTAE and medical therapy with a 30-days survival of 70%. Arterial blush, contrast late enhancement, and dimensions at CT scan were found discriminating for the embolization (p < 0.05). Conclusions: PTAE is an important tool in severely ill, bleeding COVID-19 patients. The decision for PTAE of COVID-19 patients must be carefully weighted with particular attention paid to the clinical and biological condition, hematoma location and volume. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Trends and Therapies of the COVID-19 Pandemic)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 4065 KiB  
Article
Increased Radiation Dose Exposure in Thoracic Computed Tomography in Patients with Covid-19
by Massimo Cristofaro, Nicoletta Fusco, Ada Petrone, Fabrizio Albarello, Federica Di Stefano, Elisa Pianura, Vincenzo Schininà, Stefania Ianniello and Paolo Campioni
Radiation 2021, 1(2), 153-161; https://doi.org/10.3390/radiation1020014 - 8 Jun 2021
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 5276
Abstract
The CT manifestation of COVID-19 patients is now well known and essentially reflects pathological changes in the lungs. Actually, there is insufficient knowledge on the long-term outcomes of this new disease, and several chest CTs might be necessary to evaluate the outcomes. The [...] Read more.
The CT manifestation of COVID-19 patients is now well known and essentially reflects pathological changes in the lungs. Actually, there is insufficient knowledge on the long-term outcomes of this new disease, and several chest CTs might be necessary to evaluate the outcomes. The aim of this study is to evaluate the radiation dose for chest CT scans in COVID-19 patients compared to a cohort with pulmonary infectious diseases at the same time of the previous year to value if there is any modification of exposure dose. The analysis of our data shows an increase in the overall mean dose in COVID-19 patients compared with non-COVID-19 patients. In our results, the higher dose increase occurs in the younger age groups (+86% range 21–30 years and +67% range 31–40 years). Our results show that COVID-19 patients are exposed to a significantly higher dose of ionizing radiation than other patients without COVID infectious lung disease, and especially in younger age groups, although some authors have proposed the use of radiotherapy in these patients, which is yet to be validated. Our study has limitations: the use of one CT machine in a single institute and a limited number of patients. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Radiation in Medical Imaging)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop