Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (7)

Search Parameters:
Authors = Anna Santacaterina

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
15 pages, 1854 KiB  
Article
Design and Development of a Device (Sifilotto®) for Tumour Tracking in Cervical Cancer Patients Undergoing Robotic Arm LINAC Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Boost: Background to the STARBACS Study
by Silvana Parisi, Giacomo Ferrantelli, Anna Santacaterina, Elvio Grazioso Russi, Federico Chillari, Claudio Napoli, Anna Brogna, Carmelo Siragusa, Miriam Sciacca, Antonio Pontoriero, Giuseppe Iatì and Stefano Pergolizzi
Curr. Oncol. 2025, 32(6), 354; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32060354 - 16 Jun 2025
Viewed by 385
Abstract
Standard of Care (SOC) for locally advanced cervical cancer is represented by external beam radiation therapy concurrent with platinum-based chemotherapy and immunotherapy (cCIRT) followed by brachytherapy boost and immunotherapy maintenance. In some instances, it is impossible to perform brachytherapy due to patient and/or [...] Read more.
Standard of Care (SOC) for locally advanced cervical cancer is represented by external beam radiation therapy concurrent with platinum-based chemotherapy and immunotherapy (cCIRT) followed by brachytherapy boost and immunotherapy maintenance. In some instances, it is impossible to perform brachytherapy due to patient and/or cancer issues. In these circumstances, an external beam boost could be delivered. Using a robotic arm LINAC, it is mandatory to use intramucosal implanted fiducials which are needed for tumour tracking. To avoid invasive procedures, we developed an original intravaginal 3D-printed universal device containing gold fiducials embedded within it. In this paper, we describe the step-by-step procedure that allowed us to obtain the utility model patent, including the in vivo test (feasibility, reproducibility, device compliance) on seven patients within the study protocol “STereotActic Radiotherapy Boost in locally Advanced Cervical carcinoma patientS” (STARBACS). Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Gynecologic Oncology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1028 KiB  
Article
Further Clarification of Pain Management Complexity in Radiotherapy: Insights from Modern Statistical Approaches
by Costanza Maria Donati, Erika Galietta, Francesco Cellini, Alessia Di Rito, Maurizio Portaluri, Cristina De Tommaso, Anna Santacaterina, Consuelo Tamburella, Filippo Mammini, Rossella Di Franco, Salvatore Parisi, Sabrina Cossa, Antonella Bianculli, Pierpaolo Ziccarelli, Luigi Ziccarelli, Domenico Genovesi, Luciana Caravatta, Francesco Deodato, Gabriella Macchia, Francesco Fiorica, Giuseppe Napoli, Silvia Cammelli, Letizia Cavallini, Milly Buwenge, Romina Rossi, Marco Maltoni, Alessio Giuseppe Morganti and Savino Cillaadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Cancers 2024, 16(7), 1407; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16071407 - 3 Apr 2024
Viewed by 1571
Abstract
Background: The primary objective of this study was to assess the adequacy of analgesic care in radiotherapy (RT) patients, with a secondary objective to identify predictive variables associated with pain management adequacy using a modern statistical approach, integrating the Least Absolute Shrinkage and [...] Read more.
Background: The primary objective of this study was to assess the adequacy of analgesic care in radiotherapy (RT) patients, with a secondary objective to identify predictive variables associated with pain management adequacy using a modern statistical approach, integrating the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) algorithm and the Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis. Methods: This observational, multicenter cohort study involved 1387 patients reporting pain or taking analgesic drugs from 13 RT departments in Italy. The Pain Management Index (PMI) served as the measure for pain control adequacy, with a PMI score < 0 indicating suboptimal management. Patient demographics, clinical status, and treatment-related factors were examined to discern the predictors of pain management adequacy. Results: Among the analyzed cohort, 46.1% reported inadequately managed pain. Non-cancer pain origin, breast cancer diagnosis, higher ECOG Performance Status scores, younger patient age, early assessment phase, and curative treatment intent emerged as significant determinants of negative PMI from the LASSO analysis. Notably, pain management was observed to improve as RT progressed, with a greater discrepancy between cancer (33.2% with PMI < 0) and non-cancer pain (73.1% with PMI < 0). Breast cancer patients under 70 years of age with non-cancer pain had the highest rate of negative PMI at 86.5%, highlighting a potential deficiency in managing benign pain in younger patients. Conclusions: The study underscores the dynamic nature of pain management during RT, suggesting improvements over the treatment course yet revealing specific challenges in non-cancer pain management, particularly among younger breast cancer patients. The use of advanced statistical techniques for analysis stresses the importance of a multifaceted approach to pain management, one that incorporates both cancer and non-cancer pain considerations to ensure a holistic and improved quality of oncological care. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cancer Survivorship and Quality of Life)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1863 KiB  
Article
Adequacy of Pain Management in Patients Referred for Radiation Therapy: A Subanalysis of the Multicenter ARISE-1 Study
by Costanza M. Donati, Chiara Maria Maggiore, Marco Maltoni, Romina Rossi, Elena Nardi, Alice Zamagni, Giambattista Siepe, Filippo Mammini, Francesco Cellini, Alessia Di Rito, Maurizio Portaluri, Cristina De Tommaso, Anna Santacaterina, Consuelo Tamburella, Rossella Di Franco, Salvatore Parisi, Sabrina Cossa, Vincenzo Fusco, Antonella Bianculli, Pierpaolo Ziccarelli, Luigi Ziccarelli, Domenico Genovesi, Luciana Caravatta, Francesco Deodato, Gabriella Macchia, Francesco Fiorica, Giuseppe Napoli, Milly Buwenge and Alessio G. Morgantiadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Cancers 2024, 16(1), 109; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16010109 - 25 Dec 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 1761
Abstract
Background: Pain is a prevalent symptom among cancer patients, and its management is crucial for improving their quality of life. However, pain management in cancer patients referred to radiotherapy (RT) departments is often inadequate, and limited research has been conducted on this specific [...] Read more.
Background: Pain is a prevalent symptom among cancer patients, and its management is crucial for improving their quality of life. However, pain management in cancer patients referred to radiotherapy (RT) departments is often inadequate, and limited research has been conducted on this specific population. This study aimed to assess the adequacy and effectiveness of pain management when patients are referred for RT. Moreover, we explored potential predictors of adequate pain management. Methods: This observational, prospective, multicenter cohort study included cancer patients aged 18 years or older who were referred to RT departments. A pain management assessment was conducted using the Pain Management Index (PMI), calculated by subtracting the pain score from the analgesic score (PMI < 0 indicated inadequate pain management). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify predictors of adequate pain management. Results: A total of 1042 cancer outpatients were included in the study. The analysis revealed that 42.9% of patients with pain did not receive adequate pain management based on PMI values. Among patients with pain or taking analgesics and referred to palliative or curative RT, 72% and 75% had inadequate or ineffective analgesic therapy, respectively. The odds of receiving adequate pain management (PMI ≥ 0) were higher in patients undergoing palliative RT (OR 2.52; p < 0.001), with worse ECOG-PS scores of 2, 3 and 4 (OR 1.63, 2.23, 5.31, respectively; p: 0.017, 0.002, 0.009, respectively) compared to a score of 1 for those with cancer-related pain (OR 0.38; p < 0.001), and treated in northern Italy compared to central and southern of Italy (OR 0.25, 0.42, respectively; p < 0.001). Conclusions: In this study, a substantial proportion of cancer patients referred to RT departments did not receive adequate pain management. Educational and organizational strategies are necessary to address the inadequate pain management observed in this population. Moreover, increasing the attention paid to non-cancer pain and an earlier referral of patients for palliative RT in the course of the disease may improve pain response and treatment outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Palliative Radiotherapy in Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1196 KiB  
Communication
Introducing Radiotherapy in Metastatic Merkel Cell Carcinoma Patients with Limited Progression on Avelumab: An Effective Step against Primary and Secondary Immune Resistance?
by Gianluca Ferini, Valentina Zagardo, Paola Critelli, Anna Santacaterina, Serena Sava, Mandara Muralidhar Harikar, Tejas Venkataram, Giuseppe Emmanuele Umana, Anna Viola, Vito Valenti and Stefano Forte
J. Pers. Med. 2023, 13(5), 841; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13050841 - 17 May 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2537
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the ability of radiotherapy (RT) to prolong progression-free survival (PFS) and to report treatment-related toxicities among oligoprogressive metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (mMCC) patients on avelumab. Methods: We retrospectively collected clinical data on mMCC patients who underwent radiotherapy for limited progression [...] Read more.
Purpose: To investigate the ability of radiotherapy (RT) to prolong progression-free survival (PFS) and to report treatment-related toxicities among oligoprogressive metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (mMCC) patients on avelumab. Methods: We retrospectively collected clinical data on mMCC patients who underwent radiotherapy for limited progression on avelumab. Patients were categorized as primary or secondary immune refractory depending on the time of onset of resistance to immunotherapy (at the first or subsequent follow-up visits after avelumab initiation). Pre- and post-RT PFS were calculated. Overall survival (OS) from the first progression treated with RT was also reported. Radiological responses and toxicities were evaluated according to the irRECIST criteria and RTOG scoring system, respectively. Results: Eight patients, including five females, with a median age of 75 years, met our inclusion criteria. The median gross tumor and clinical target volumes at first progression on avelumab were 29.85 cc and 236.7 cc, respectively. The treatment sites included lymph node, skin, brain, and spine metastases. Four patients received more than one course of RT. Most patients were treated with palliative radiation doses (mainly 30 Gy in 3 Gy/day fractions). Two patients were treated with stereotactic RT. Five/eight patients were primary immune refractory. The objective response rate at the first post-RT assessment was 75%, whereas no local failure was reported. The median pre-RT PFS was 3 months. The pre-RT PFS was 37.5% at 6 months and 12.5% at 1 year. The median post-RT PFS was not reached. The post-RT PFS was 60% at 6 months and 1 year. The post-RT OS was 85.7% at 1 year and 64.3% at 2 years. No relevant treatment-related toxicity was observed. After a median follow-up of 18.5 months, 6/8 patients are still alive and continuing on avelumab therapy. Conclusions: Adding radiotherapy to mMCC patients with limited progression on avelumab seems to be safe and effective in prolonging the successful use of immunotherapy, regardless of the type of immune refractoriness. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cancer Immunotherapy: Current Advancements and Future Perspectives)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1400 KiB  
Article
Adequacy of Pain Treatment in Radiotherapy Departments: Results of a Multicenter Study on 2104 Patients (Arise)
by Costanza M. Donati, Elena Nardi, Alice Zamagni, Giambattista Siepe, Filippo Mammini, Francesco Cellini, Alessia Di Rito, Maurizio Portaluri, Cristina De Tommaso, Anna Santacaterina, Consuelo Tamburella, Rossella Di Franco, Salvatore Parisi, Sabrina Cossa, Vincenzo Fusco, Antonella Bianculli, Pierpaolo Ziccarelli, Luigi Ziccarelli, Domenico Genovesi, Luciana Caravatta, Francesco Deodato, Gabriella Macchia, Francesco Fiorica, Giuseppe Napoli, Milly Buwenge, Romina Rossi, Marco Maltoni and Alessio G. Morgantiadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Cancers 2022, 14(19), 4660; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14194660 - 25 Sep 2022
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 2329
Abstract
Aim: The frequent inadequacy of pain management in cancer patients is well known. Moreover, the quality of analgesic treatment in patients treated with radiotherapy (RT) has only been rarely assessed. In order to study the latter topic, we conducted a multicenter, observational and [...] Read more.
Aim: The frequent inadequacy of pain management in cancer patients is well known. Moreover, the quality of analgesic treatment in patients treated with radiotherapy (RT) has only been rarely assessed. In order to study the latter topic, we conducted a multicenter, observational and prospective study based on the Pain Management Index (PMI) in RT Italian departments. Methods: We collected data on age, gender, tumor site and stage, performance status, treatment aim, and pain (type: CP—cancer pain, NCP—non-cancer pain, MP—mixed pain; intensity: NRS: Numeric Rating Scale). Furthermore, we analyzed the impact on PMI on these parameters, and we defined a pain score with values from 0 (NRS: 0, no pain) to 3 (NRS: 7–10: intense pain) and an analgesic score from 0 (pain medication not taken) to 3 (strong opioids). By subtracting the pain score from the analgesic score, we obtained the PMI value, considering cases with values < 0 as inadequate analgesic prescriptions. The Ethics Committees of the participating centers approved the study (ARISE-1 study). Results: Two thousand one hundred four non-selected outpatients with cancer and aged 18 years or older were enrolled in 13 RT departments. RT had curative and palliative intent in 62.4% and 37.6% patients, respectively. Tumor stage was non-metastatic in 57.3% and metastatic in 42.7% of subjects, respectively. Pain affected 1417 patients (CP: 49.5%, NCP: 32.0%; MP: 18.5%). PMI was < 0 in 45.0% of patients with pain. At multivariable analysis, inadequate pain management was significantly correlated with curative RT aim, ECOG performance status = 1 (versus both ECOG-PS3 and ECOG- PS4), breast cancer, non-cancer pain, and Central and South Italy RT Departments (versus Northern Italy).Conclusions: Pain management was less adequate in patients with more favorable clinical condition and stage. Educational and organizational strategies are needed in RT departments to reduce the non-negligible percentage of patients with inadequate analgesic therapy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cancer-Related Pain)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 845 KiB  
Article
Impressive Results after “Metabolism-Guided” Lattice Irradiation in Patients Submitted to Palliative Radiation Therapy: Preliminary Results of LATTICE_01 Multicenter Study
by Gianluca Ferini, Silvana Parisi, Sara Lillo, Anna Viola, Fabio Minutoli, Paola Critelli, Vito Valenti, Salvatore Ivan Illari, Anna Brogna, Giuseppe Emmanuele Umana, Giacomo Ferrantelli, Gabriele Lo Giudice, Chiara Carrubba, Valentina Zagardo, Anna Santacaterina, Salvatore Leotta, Alberto Cacciola, Antonio Pontoriero and Stefano Pergolizzi
Cancers 2022, 14(16), 3909; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14163909 - 12 Aug 2022
Cited by 37 | Viewed by 3234
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate feasibility, toxicities, and clinical response in Stage IV patients treated with palliative “metabolism-guided” lattice technique. Patients and Methods: From June 2020 to December 2021, 30 consecutive clinical stage IV patients with 31 bulky lesions were included in this study. All [...] Read more.
Purpose: To evaluate feasibility, toxicities, and clinical response in Stage IV patients treated with palliative “metabolism-guided” lattice technique. Patients and Methods: From June 2020 to December 2021, 30 consecutive clinical stage IV patients with 31 bulky lesions were included in this study. All patients received palliative irradiation consisting of a spatially fractionated high radiation dose delivered in spherical deposits (vertices, Vs) within the bulky disease. The Vs were placed at the edges of tumor areas with different metabolisms at the PET exam following a non-geometric arrangement. Precisely, the Vs overlapped the interfaces between the tumor areas of higher 18F-FDG uptake (>75% SUV max) and areas with lower 18F-FDG uptake. A median dose of 15 Gy/1 fraction (range 10–27 Gy in 1/3 fractions) was delivered to the Vs. Within 7 days after the Vs boost, all the gross tumor volume (GTV) was homogeneously treated with hypo-fractionated radiation therapy (RT). Results: The rate of symptomatic response was 100%, and it was observed immediately after lattice RT delivery in 3/30 patients, while 27/30 patients had a symptomatic response within 8 days from the end of GTV irradiation. Radiation-related acute grade ≥1 toxicities were observed in 6/30 (20%) patients. The rate of overall clinical response was 89%, including 23% of complete remission. The 1-year overall survival rate was 86.4%. Conclusions: “Metabolism-guided” lattice radiotherapy is feasible and well-tolerated, being able to yield very impressive results both in terms of symptom relief and overall clinical response rate in stage IV bulky disease patients. These preliminary results seem to indicate that this kind of therapy could emerge as the best therapeutic option for this patient setting. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research in Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapies for Cancers)
Show Figures

Figure 1

6 pages, 1544 KiB  
Case Report
Gastroparesis, Thymoma, and Asymptomatic Myasthenia: A Rare Clinical Scenario
by Consuelo Tamburella, Silvana Parisi, Sara Lillo, Giacomo Ferrantelli, Paola Critelli, Anna Viola, Angelo Platania, Maria Santoro, Alberto Cacciola, Anna Santacaterina and Gianluca Ferini
Gastroenterol. Insights 2022, 13(1), 27-32; https://doi.org/10.3390/gastroent13010004 - 15 Jan 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 5635
Abstract
Background: Paraneoplastic gastroparesis is a gastrointestinal syndrome that rarely precedes a tumor diagnosis. To increase awareness of this rare clinical entity, we present a case of severe gastroparesis, which was later proven to be associated with a thymoma. Case report: A 55-year old [...] Read more.
Background: Paraneoplastic gastroparesis is a gastrointestinal syndrome that rarely precedes a tumor diagnosis. To increase awareness of this rare clinical entity, we present a case of severe gastroparesis, which was later proven to be associated with a thymoma. Case report: A 55-year old man had the sudden onset of severe abdominal cramps and abdominal distension, early satiety with postprandial nausea, acid regurgitation, belching, and flatulence. He lost about 20 pounds. The physical and imaging examination revealed stomach distension, gastroparesis, and the presence of a solid mass in the anterior mediastinum. Radical surgery was performed to remove the thymoma and, given the high value of Mib-1, the patient was submitted to postoperative chest radiation therapy. After thymectomy, a diagnosis of paraneoplastic myasthenia gravis with subacute autonomic failure was made. Conclusion: Autoimmune gastroparesis should be considered as a potential paraneoplastic syndrome in patients with thymoma, myasthenia gravis, and delayed gastric emptying in the absence of mechanical obstruction. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Novel Therapeutics and Prognostications in Gastrointestinal Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop