Next Article in Journal
Effects of Drought and Salinity on Two Commercial Varieties of Lavandula angustifolia Mill
Next Article in Special Issue
Thermal Requirements Underpinning Germination Allude to Risk of Species Decline from Climate Warming
Previous Article in Journal
Creating Predictive Weed Emergence Models Using Repeat Photography and Image Analysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Comparative Seed Morphology of Tropical and Temperate Orchid Species with Different Growth Habits
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 9
Issue 5
10.3390/plants9050636
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Breaking Seed Dormancy during Dry Storage: A Useful Tool or Major Problem for Successful Restoration via Direct Seeding?

by
Carol C. Baskin
1,2,* and
Jerry M. Baskin
1
1
Department of Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506-0225, USA
2
Department of Plant and Soil Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546-0321, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2020, 9(5), 636; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9050636
Submission received: 17 April 2020 / Revised: 7 May 2020 / Accepted: 9 May 2020 / Published: 16 May 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Linking Seed Biology to Plant Preservation: New Advances and Perspectives)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
To facilitate the restoration of disturbed vegetation, seeds of wild species are collected and held in dry storage, but often there is a shortage of seeds for this purpose. Thus, much research effort is expended to maximize the use of the available seeds and to ensure that they are nondormant when sown. Sowing nondormant (versus dormant) seeds in the field should increase the success of the restoration. Of the various treatments available to break seed dormancy, afterripening, that is, dormancy break during dry storage, is the most cost-effective. Seeds that can undergo afterripening have nondeep physiological dormancy, and this includes members of common families such as Asteraceae and Poaceae. In this review, we consider differences between species in terms of seed moisture content, temperature and time required for afterripening and discuss the conditions in which afterripening is rapid but could lead to seed aging and death if storage is too long. Attention is given to the induction of secondary dormancy in seeds that have become nondormant via afterripening and to the biochemical and molecular changes occurring in seeds during dry storage. Some recommendations are made for managing afterripening so that seeds are nondormant at the time for sowing. The most important recommendation probably is that germination responses of the seeds need to be monitored for germinability/viability during the storage period.

1. Introduction

Seeds of many wild species are collected and placed in dry storage because they are needed for habitat restoration projects [1]. At some point in time, the stored seeds will be sown in the field in an attempt to establish new populations [2] or in nurseries to generate plants for out-planting to sites that need to be restored [3,4,5]. The demand for seeds for restoration is enormous, and it has become very clear that the quantities of seeds needed for these endeavors cannot be obtained solely by collecting them from wild plants [2,6,7,8,9,10,11]. Various solutions to the seed-shortage problem have been proposed, including the development of seed production areas for wild species [9,12,13,14]; establishment of community seed banks [6]; and formation of regional [15] and national [16] strategies to deal with the collection, production and management of seeds needed for restoration. Further, plans need to be developed to maximize the use of seeds that have been collected [17], for example, to ensure that seeds are viable and nondormant when sown, and León-Lobos et al. [11] advocate that additional research on seed dormancy-breaking and germination requirements needs to be conducted.
Although restoration can be attempted/achieved by direct sowing of seeds in the field and by transplanting juvenile plants to the site, the most cost-effective method of restoration is direct seeding [18,19,20,21]. Direct seeding in the field avoids the expenses for pots, soil, water, transportation to the field site and wages for helpers to care for young plants and to transplant juveniles from pots into soil at the restoration site. However, sowing seeds in the field may not result in a high percentage of emerged seedlings [22]. For example, seedlings emerged from only 8%–10% of the caryopses of the grasses Triodia epactia S.W.L. Jacobs and T. wiseana C.A. Gardner sown in the field in the Pilbara region of NW Western Australia, and this was in the water-addition (4 × 24 mm of water) treatment; no seedlings emerged in the non-watered control [23]. Seedling emergence from caryopses of the grasses Agropyron desertorum (Fisch. ex Link) Schult., Elymus elymoides (Raf.) Swezey and Pseudoroegenaria spicata (Pursh) A. Löve sown in the field in the Great Basin in Eastern Oregon (USA) was only 17% and 7% in tilled plots and burned sites, respectively [24]. However, direct seeding was effective in a neotropical savanna when the area was plowed and heavily seeded [20].
There are many reasons why seeds sown in the field may not germinate, including lack of sufficient soil moisture at the time temperatures are favorable for germination [25], light/dark requirements not fulfilled (for example [26]) and destruction of seeds by animals [27]. Thus, seeds usually are sown in the field when environmental factors are perceived to be favorable for germination, and sometimes experimental seed-sowing plots are watered at least once, for example [28]. Another important reason for a lack of germination when seeds are sown in the field is that they are dormant. It has been suggested that mixtures of species, some with nondormant seeds and others with dormant seeds, sown at the same time at a restoration site might result in the vegetation being dominated by plants of the species with nondormant seeds [29].
Although freshly-matured seeds of some species are nondormant and require no dormancy-breaking treatments [30], seeds of many species are dormant at maturity. Thus, much research effort has been devoted to finding effective treatments to break dormancy prior to sowing. Pretreatments to break the dormancy of seeds with water-impermeable seed coats (physical dormancy, PY), include mechanical scarification [31], chemical scarification (usually with concentrated sulfuric acid) [32] and dipping in hot or boiling water [33,34]. If large quantities of seeds with PY need to be made water-permeable, this can be done by various machines that have been developed to scarify seeds (see [35,36,37]). Seeds with water-permeable seed coats may be given cold (moist) stratification [30]; treated with karrikinolide (KAR1), gibberellic acid-3 (GA3) [38,39] or sodium hypochlorite [40]; scarified [40]; or given a heat treatment [41]. Also, removing the covering structures of grass caryopses can promote germination [42,43,44].
Afterripening, or dormancy-break during dry storage, is another way in which dormancy of seeds to be used for restoration can be broken [29]. Originally, “afterripening” was used to describe dormancy-breaking that occurred after seed dispersal [45]. Thus, the term has been used to describe the growth of underdeveloped embryos that must occur in seeds of some species before they can germinate [46] and dormancy-break during incubation at cold (moist) conditions [47]. Since at least the 1950s, “afterripening” has been used primarily to describe dormancy-break during dry storage of seeds [48,49], and this is how we use it in this review.
Many plant researchers are aware that a period of dry storage at room temperatures may break seed dormancy (for example [41,50,51,52,53,54]), but the potential of this method to break seed dormancy of species to be used in restoration projects has not been fully realized. Clearly, if seeds are water-permeable and will afterripen during dry storage, this is a cost-effective method to break dormancy prior to sowing. However, depending on the species, afterripening requirements can vary, and an extended afterripening treatment could lead to induction into secondary dormancy or to seed aging (loss of vigor) and death (see below). The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of dormancy break during dry storage and make recommendations with regard to the management of afterripening so that it is a useful tool and not a major headache for restoration.

2. Seeds That Can Afterripen

In all major vegetation zones on earth, there are more species with dormant than nondormant seeds, except in evergreen tropical rainforests, where the percentages of species with dormant and nondormant seeds are 51.4% and 48.6%, respectively [55]. There are five classes of dormancy: morphological, morphophysiological, physiological, physical and combinational (physical + physiological). In all vegetation zones on earth, physiological dormancy (PD) is the most common class. Seeds with PD have fully developed embryos that have a physiological inhibiting mechanism for germination. There are three levels of PD (nondeep, intermediate and deep), and nondeep is by far the most common [55]. Nondeep PD is the kind of dormancy in seeds of various families such as Amaranthaceae, Asteraceae, Brassicaceae, Caryophyllaceae, Euphorbiaceae, Lamiaceae, Myrtaceae, Poaceae, Plantaginaceae, Proteaceae, Scrophulariaceae and Solanaceae. An important characteristic of seeds with nondeep PD is that dormancy-break can occur during dry storage; that is, they can afterripen. Starting with freshly-matured seeds, afterripening is detected by testing samples of seeds for germination over a range of conditions after various periods of storage.
During afterripening, germination percentages and rates (speed) and the range of conditions over which seeds will germinate may increase [56,57,58]. For example, during afterripening seeds of many winter annuals exhibit an increase not only in percentages and rates of germination but also in the maximum temperature at which they can germinate [59]. In terms of parameters of the hydrothermal time model, the base temperature (Tb) can shift, for example in the summer annual Polygonum aviculare L. as dormancy break occurs [60]. Also, during afterripening the response of seeds to light/dark and water stress can change. For example, seeds of Bromus diandrus Roth stored dry at room temperature for two months germinated to 80–100% in the dark at 10, 15, 20 and 25 °C at water potentials of 0, −0.2, and −0.4 MPa; however, those in the light germinated to only 0–10%, regardless of test conditions [61]. Following 12 months of afterripening, seeds of this species incubated in the dark at 10, 15, 20 and 25 °C at 0, −0.2, −0.4 and −0.8 MPa germinated to 95–100%, while those incubated in light at 10, 15 and 20 °C at 0 and −0.2 MPa germinated to 85–95%. Germination in the light at 10, 15 and 20 °C at −0.4 MPa was about 50%, 50% and 90%, respectively. Thus, afterripening increased the ability of seeds to germinate in the light and at increased water stress. That is, the hydrotime parameters of seeds were modified by afterripening, resulting in a shift of the base water potential (Ψb) for germination to more negative values [61]. The base water potential for germination also became more negative for seeds of Bromus tectorum L. as they afterripened [62].
Afterripening has been reported in seeds that remain on dead mother plants in the field [59] and in those stored in closed containers at room temperature [59,63], in paper bags at room temperature [64,65], dry at ambient room temperature and relative humidity (RH) [66], at 30% RH at room temperature [67] and in sealed Petri dishes at 20 °C [68]. Also, afterripening is known to occur in seeds stored dry at low temperatures, for example, seeds of Hordeum vulgare L. afterripened at 8 °C [69], Berberis spp. at 3–4 °C [70], Oryza sativa L. (this is weedy rice, commonly called red rice, which is a variety of O. sativa that can be a serious pest in rice fields) at 5 °C [43], Calendula sp. at 4 °C [71], Amaranthus retroflexus L. at 0–5 °C [72], Ochradenus baccatus Delile at −18 °C [73], Lepidium virginicum L. at −20 °C [74], Juniperus sp. at −23 °C [75] and Dactylis glomerata L. at −75 °C [76]. However, seeds of O. sativa (weedy rice) did not afterripen when stored dry at −15 °C [43].
Afterripening in dry storage can be an important part of the dormancy-breaking protocol in seeds with the intermediate level of PD. For example, about 75–80% of the freshly matured seeds of Isatis violascens Bunge have intermediate PD. When seeds of this species were cold stratified at 4 °C immediately after collection, 21% of them germinated during a 12-week period at 4 °C. However, seeds allowed to afterripen in dry storage at room temperatures for six months germinated 100% during a 12-week period at 4 °C. Thus, 21% of the seeds had nondeep PD, and 79% had intermediate PD [77].
Afterripening is a part of the dormancy-breaking requirements of some seeds with morphophysiological dormancy (MPD). Seeds with MPD have a small underdeveloped embryo that grows inside the seed prior to radicle emergence (germination), and the embryo has PD. If the species is a winter annual and its seeds have nondeep simple MPD, PD is broken via afterripening during summer, and embryo growth and germination occur in autumn if exposed to light, as in Chaerophyllum tainturieri Hook. and Arn. [78] and Papaver rhoeas L. [79]. Afterripening is also a part of the dormancy-breaking requirements of some seeds with PY and a physiologically-dormant embryo, that is, seeds that have combinational dormancy (PY + PD). If the species is a winter annual and its seeds have PY + PD, PD is broken via afterripening during summer while the seed/fruit coat is water-impermeable. In autumn, the seed/fruit coat becomes water-permeable and the seed germinates, as in Geranium carolinianum L. [80] and Vicia sativa L. [81].
It should be mentioned that dry storage may, or may not, promote a dormancy-break in seeds with only PY. These seeds have a nondormant embryo but do not germinate due to a water-impermeable seed/fruit coat. During a long period of dry storage, some seeds with PY may become permeable, presumably due to opening of the water gap in the seed (or fruit) coat and not to afterripening per se. A water gap is a small structure in/on the seed (or fruit) coat of water-impermeable seeds (or fruits) that opens in response to appropriate environmental signals, thereby allowing water to enter [55]. After 12 years of dry storage at room temperatures, germination of Mimosa foliolosa Benth. seeds increased from about 10% to 60% but that of M. maguirei Barneby seeds decreased from about 10% to 5% [82]. After four years of dry storage at 15 °C and 15% RH germination of Collaea argentina Griseb. increased from 5% to 60% and that of Abutilon pauciflorum A.St.-Hil. seeds from 1% to 6% [83]. Seeds of wild Glycine soja Siebold and Zucc. were stored dry at room temperature for nine years, during which time water-permeable seeds increased from 4% to 91% in one ecotype and from 33% to 98% in a second ecotype [84]. Germination of Astragalus cicer L. seeds stored dry at room temperature for 14 years increased from 11% to 67% [85] but in another study, the germination (at 25 °C) of seeds of this species stored dry at room temperature for three years decreased from 18% to 11% [86].

3. Conditions Required for Afterripening

An early approach to studying afterripening was to store seeds at different RHs. Fresh (dormant) seeds of the winter annual Draba verna L. incubated over a range of RHs at 25 °C differed in the percentage of nondormant seeds after three months: 0–5% nondormant at 0–20% RH, 20–40% nondormant at 30–40% RH and 60–65% nondormant at 50–60% RH; seeds lost viability at 70–100% RH [87]. For the winter annual Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh., 33–75% RH (at 10 to 20 °C) was optimal for afterripening, while no afterripening occurred at 1% RH [88]. Most seeds of Brassica japonica Makino stored in a desiccator at room temperature were still dormant after three years, while 100% of the seeds stored in open air at room temperature were nondormant after two months [89].
Various studies of afterripening have now been done in which the seed moisture content (MC) was determined, and seeds were stored at specific temperatures and monitored until dormancy was broken. The idea behind these studies was to determine the optimum conditions for dormancy-break (Table 1). The most favorable conditions for afterripening often are a seed MC of 5%–10% fresh weight and temperatures of 20–30 °C, with storage time ranging from 1.5 to 12 months.
In general, afterripening during dry storage at low temperatures is slower than it is at high temperatures. Little afterripening occurred in seeds of Oryza sativa (weedy rice) at 5 °C, and it was faster at 30 °C than at 20 °C [43]. Similarly, only a few seeds of Lolium rigidum Gaudich. afterripened at 9 °C, and the order of afterripening at other temperatures was 50 > 40 > 30 > 20 °C [90]. The percentage of Avena fatua L. seeds that afterripened decreased with temperatures: 40 > 30 > 20 °C. However, as the temperature decreased the seed MC level required for afterripening to occur increased, for example, at 40 °C and 30 °C seed MC for afterripening was 10–12% and 14–20%, respectively [91]. However, for seeds of Arabidopsis thaliana with increased seed water content, the optimum temperature for afterripening increased, for example, at 0.04 and 0.08 g H2O [g dw]−1 the optimum temperature was 10 and 25 °C, respectively [88].
At a given temperature, afterripening usually is faster at relatively high than at low seed MC. At 30 and 45 °C, seeds of Anthocercis littorea Labill. with 5.0% MC afterripened faster than those with 2.9% MC, and seeds of Dioscorea hastifolia Nees with 9.7% MC afterripened faster than those with 5.3% MC [92]. At 23 °C, seeds of Austrostipa elegantissima (Labill.) S.W.L. Jacobs and Everett and Conostylis candicans Endl. equilibrated with 50% and 75% RH afterripened faster than those equilibrated with 5%, 13% or 23% RH [93].
As can be seen in Table 1, the rate (speed) at which seeds in dry storage become nondormant varies with species, MC and storage conditions. However, if we consider the life history of the species some general predictions can be made with regard to how long it may take seeds to become nondormant via afterripening. If species have seeds that normally undergo dormancy break when habitat temperatures are ≥ 15 °C, afterripening at room temperatures will be relatively rapid, that is, one to three months [59,63]. However, if species have seeds that normally undergo dormancy break when habitat temperatures are low enough for cold (moist) stratification (about 0 to 10 °C) afterripening is very slow. For example, seeds of the summer annual Ambrosia trifida L. mature in autumn, and cold stratification during winter breaks dormancy, with germination occurring in early spring. After three months of cold stratification at 5 °C, 100% of embryos removed from seeds of this species germinated, but only 5% of embryos removed from seeds dry-stored in the laboratory for six months did so [94].

4. What Happens to Seeds during Afterripening?

Various studies have been conducted in an attempt to understand why afterripened seeds germinate at higher percentages/rates than fresh seeds. For example, as the afterripening period for Arachis hypogaea L. seeds stored dry at room temperature increased ethylene production (at 48 h after the start of imbibition) and germination percentage increased [104]. On the other hand, seeds of Nicotiana tabacum stored dry at room temperature for one year exhibited faster testa and endosperm rupture than non-afterripened seeds [105].
Many studies have monitored changes in biochemistry and molecular biology of seeds during the afterripening period [106]. Bazin et al. [107] found that 24 of the mRNAs produced during seed development of Helianthus annuus L. and stored in the dry seeds were oxidized during afterripening at 5%, 60% and 75% RH at 25 °C. Oxidation of mRNAs resulted in changes in the transcription of genes involved in cell signaling and responses to stress. Further, the decrease in dormancy during dry storage of H. annuus seeds at 25 °C was correlated with a reduction in sensitivity to abscisic acid (ABA) [108]. In one genotype of H. annuus, ABA levels of afterripened seeds decreased when seeds were imbibed, and sensitivity to paclobutrazol (a plant growth retardant that inhibits gibberellin biosynthesis) and applied GA3 increased [108]. As seeds of Triticum aestivum L. afterripened, they first became sensitive to treatment with GA, which promoted germination, and then they became insensitive to ABA, an inhibitor of germination [109].
As seeds of Helianthus annuus afterripened at 5% and 75% RH at 25 °C for three and six weeks, reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulated in cells of the embryonic axis, and during this time oxidation of specific embryo proteins and lipid peroxidation occurred [110]. ROS production also occurs during afterripening of seeds of other species, for example, Hordeum vulgare L. [111] and Arabidopsis thaliana [112]. Further, after nondormant seeds imbibe additional ROS are generated and play a role in controlling the germination process [113]. However, if seeds are stored for a long period of time they may lose viability due to the accumulation of ROS and a decrease in the antioxidant potential of cells in the embryo [114].
Many approaches are being taken to better understand the molecular biology of afterripening, including studies on gene transcription [115,116], genome expression of Arabidopsis mutants [117], mRNA expression profiling [118], proteomic analysis [119] and level of DELAY OF GERMINATION 1 proteins [120]. For example, upon hydration of dormant and afterripened (nondormant) seeds of Arabidopsis thaliana differences were found in the gene expression profiles within three hours after sowing, indicating that “after-ripening presets the transcriptional response following initiation of imbibition” [116]. During afterripening of A. thaliana seeds with the GA-insensitive sleepy 1-2 mutant that promotes dormancy, there was a reduction in dormancy-promoting transcripts of this gene stored in the seeds, which lead to breaking of dormancy [121]. Although much progress has been made in understanding afterripening, Chahtane et al. [122] concluded that still “primary seed dormancy and its regulation during after-ripening remain poorly understood”.

5. Potential Problems with Afterripening of Seeds

First, seeds may not afterripen in dry storage. Only a few (4–6%) seeds of Corispermum lehmannianum Bunge stored in paper bags at room conditions (20 °C, 20–30% RH) for seven months germinated when tested over a range of alternating temperature regimes [123]. Seeds of Penstemon gibbensii Dorn stored dry at room temperatures for zero and two years germinated to 16.3% and 15.3%, respectively, indicating that no afterripening occurred [124]. When seeds from six populations of Sporobolus phleoides Hack. ex Stucky. were stored dry at 20 °C for 0, 12, 18 and 24 months and then tested at 20, 30 and 30/20 °C, only seeds from two of the populations exhibited significant dormancy break. For the two populations with seed afterripening, however, maximum germination (after 12–18 months) was only 31% and 39% [125]. Further, in Asteraceae species with trimorphic diaspores, that is, three kinds of achenes in a capitulum that differ in size, mass and morphology, the amount of afterripening varies with the position of the achenes in the capitulum. Maximum germination of central, intermediate and peripheral achenes of Garhadiolus papposus Boiss and Buhse stored dry at room temperature for three months was 58%, 40% and 0%, respectively; peripheral achenes were viable [126].
Second, whereas seeds kept in conditions suitable for afterripening may become nondormant, and after an extended period they may exhibit symptoms of aging (decreased vigor) and eventually die (Table 2). Thus, seeds with a relatively high MC stored at high temperatures may afterripen quickly, but after six or more months of storage, depending on the species, they may be dead.
Third, seeds kept in conditions suitable for afterripening for an extended period may enter secondary dormancy. About 90% of seeds from each of two New Zealand populations (Oruawairua Island and Lincoln College) of Arthropodium cirrhatum (G. Forst.) R.Br. stored dry at room temperature for 6 months were nondormant; however, after 15 months of storage, about 50% and 98% of the seeds were nondormant, respectively. That is, a high proportion of the seeds from the Oruawairua Island population were viable but had entered secondary dormancy [127]. Achenes of Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. with 6% MC stored at 12, 19, 26 and 33 °C for 0, 10, 30 and 150 days exhibited a decrease in germination from about 80% prior to storage to about 5% after storage at all four temperatures; seeds were viable [128]. After four months of storage in plastic containers at room temperature (20 to 25 °C) with 30% to 50% RH, seeds of Amaranthus tuberculatus (Moq.) Sauer collected in 2009 afterripened, with germination increasing from about 10% to 100%. After six months of storage, however, germination had decreased to 40%, indicating induction of secondary dormancy in the viable seeds [129]. Seeds of Arabidopsis thaliana stored for nine weeks at 33% and 45% RH at 10 °C; 45% and 56% RH at 15 °C, 56% RH at 20 °C; or 56%, 75% and 85% RH at 25 °C exhibited a significant decrease in germination when subsequently incubated at 25 °C, that is, secondary dormancy had been induced in the viable seeds [88].
Seeds of Agriophyllum squarrosum (L.) Moq. afterripened during dry storage at room temperature for one month [130,131], but in another study seeds of this species stored at room temperature for six months exhibited a decrease in germination from 92% to 39% [132], due to induction of secondary dormancy. In a third study, however, seeds stored at room temperature for 2–3 months and then stored in a refrigerator for four months germinated to 100% [133]. Thus, to ensure that seeds of this species will germinate when sown in spring the authors recommended: (1) store fresh seeds dry at room temperature for two to three months to allow afterripening to occur, and (2) transfer seeds to 4–5 °C to prevent them from entering secondary dormancy [134].
An extended period of dry storage at low temperatures can increase dormancy in seeds of some species. Dry storage of Corylus avellana L. nuts decreased the germination of embryos removed from the nuts. Whereas embryos from fresh nuts of this species germinated to 64% at 20 °C, those from nuts dry-stored at 10 °C for four and eight weeks germinated to only 30% and 10%, respectively [135]. Germinability of Picea glauca (Moench) Voss seeds with an MC of 5.5% was 87%, but after storage at 4, −20, −80 and −196 °C for six months, they germinated to only 52%, 47%, 36% and 23%, respectively. However, when seeds dry-stored for 6 months were cold stratified for 21 days germination was 89% to 91% [136]. Germination of Alyssoides utriculata (L.) Medik. and Matthiola sinuata (L.) R.Br. with an MC of 0.3% to 3% stored in sealed vials at –5 to –10 °C for 38–40 years decreased from 100% to 5% and 4%, respectively; 95% and 99% of these seeds were viable. However, seeds of 10 other species of Brassicaceae exposed to the same conditions germinated to 76–100% after the same period of storage, indicating no induction into secondary dormancy [137].

6. Management of Afterripening

Since a high percentage of the species that might be used in restoration projects have nondeep PD, it is reasonable to think that careful manipulation of such seeds during storage would result in them becoming nondormant via afterripening. Therefore, nondormant seeds would be available for sowing. However, the phrase “careful manipulation” is important here. First seeds need to be stored under conditions that promote afterripening. Seed MC may need to be regulated prior to and during storage to avoid storing seeds with so little water in them that afterripening does not occur [88,89,90]. On the other hand, storing seeds at a high MC (or high RH) at a relatively high temperature might result in rapid afterripening, but it could also lead to seed death if storage under these conditions is prolonged (Table 2). If a restoration project involves numerous species, the suggested starting point for afterripening is to store seeds at room temperature at about 50% RH and a seed MC of 5–10%.
The recommendation is to determine seed MC prior to placing seeds into storage using the oven-drying method. If seeds have a MC well above or below the desired level, then adjustments in the MC need to be made. If the MC is above the desired 5%–10%, then seeds should be allowed to dry to this level. Large quantities of seeds can be dried in electric air-flow driers, preferably at a relatively low temperature. Seeds of Carthamus tinctoris were dried in an electric drier at 40, 50, 60 and 70 °C to 6.6% MC and then stored dry in sealed containers at room temperature for 240 days. Those dried at 40 °C had the highest viability [141].
If seeds have a MC below the desired level, the MC can be increased by allowing seeds to equilibrate in an atmosphere with a high RH (eRH). Studies of various species have been done in which seeds were allowed to equilibrate over a range of RHs, and then the MC of the seeds at each RH was determined. For small batches of seeds, a range of RHs can be obtained by using saturated salt solutions: lithium chloride (11% RH), magnesium chloride (32% RH), calcium nitrate (50% RH) and sodium chloride (75% RH) [142]. At a given RH, for example at 50% RH, the MC of seeds will vary, depending on the species (Table 3).
It is important to conduct germination tests on freshly-matured seeds and at regular intervals test seeds stored under afterripening conditions [147]. Ideally, seeds should be tested at several alternating temperature regimes in both the light and dark, but it is especially important to test them at a temperature regime that simulates conditions in the field at the time the seeds will be sown. By monitoring seed germination at regular intervals, it will be apparent when dormancy has been broken. Thus, if seeds are still dormant (or cannot germinate at simulated field temperatures) at the time seed-sowing should take place in the field, then perhaps the seeds should not be used/sown. That is, if seeds are not capable of germinating in a Petri dish at simulated field temperatures (at the desired time of sowing), we should not expect them to germinate if they are sown in the field, where moisture stress is likely to occur. It would be better to delay sowing these seeds until they become nondormant than to risk having dormant seeds die or be eaten (or otherwise lost from the viable seed population) in the field. On the other hand, the decision might be made to allow dormancy-break to occur in the field under natural conditions. In the seasonally dry tropical forests of Northern Thailand, however, sowing seeds as soon as they matured vs. storing and then sowing them at the beginning of the rainy season did not significantly affect the number of seedlings established per 100 seeds sown [21]. It was concluded that species selection was more important than the time of seed sowing.
If dormancy is broken during dry storage several months prior to the time seeds will be sown in the field, then consideration should be given to transferring seeds to low temperatures (4–5 °C), hopefully, to prevent their entrance into secondary dormancy and/or loss of viability. We know that transferring nondormant seeds of Agriophyllum squarrosum to a low temperature prevents them from entering second dormancy prior to spring sowing [134] but it is not known how well this strategy would work for other species, for example, winter annuals. If fully afterripened seeds are transferred to a low temperature, continued germination monitoring is recommended to determine if seeds remain nondormant and viable.

7. Future Research Needs

One important question concerns the storage of seeds after they have become nondormant via afterripening. We have seen (above) that prolonged storage in conditions that promote afterripening can result in seeds entering secondary dormancy or even losing viability. After seeds have afterripened, would a decrease in MC to about 1% and/or a decrease in temperature prevent the seeds from entering secondary dormancy, or at least decrease the rate at which this happens? This is a question worthy of future research.
If seeds afterripen and then subsequently are induced into secondary dormancy, what conditions are required to break secondary dormancy? In general, we do not have a good answer to this question, which could very likely vary with the species. In the case of Arabidopsis thaliana seeds stored at 10, 15, 20 and 25 °C at 45% RH, maximum germination of seeds tested at 25 °C occurred after seven weeks of storage. After nine weeks of storage, most of the seeds failed to germinate at 25 °C; they had been induced into secondary dormancy. However, continued storage at the four temperatures for up to 28 weeks resulted in an increase in the germination of seeds at 25 °C, but maximum germination was only about 35% [88].
Is there year-to-year variation in the ability of seeds of a particular species to afterripen? Seeds of Amaranthus tuberculatus collected in 2009 afterripened (100% germination) when stored dry at room temperatures for six months. However, seeds of this species collected in 2010 and stored for six months germinated to only 20% [129]. If there is year-to-year variation in the ability of seeds to afterripen in dry storage, how do environmental conditions under which the seeds matured differ between the years when seeds will and will not afterripen? Also, what role does the maternal environment play in the potential for seeds to be induced into secondary dormancy? Seeds of Arabidopsis thaliana produced at a low (14 °C) temperature were more likely to be induced into second dormancy by incubation under high water stress than those produced at a high (25 °C) temperature [148].
There is some evidence for intrataxon variation in how well seeds afterripen. After 70 days of dry storage at 35–40 °C, caryopses of Hordeum spontaneum K.Koch from six sites in Israel germinated to about 75%, 70%, 50%, 20%, 45% and 75% [149]. There is also a year-to-year variation in intrataxon variation in how well seeds afterripen. After 11 months of afterripening in dry storage at 23 °C, seeds of Arabidopsis lyrata (L.) O’Kane and Al-Shehbaz collected from three sites in 2007 germinated to 70%, 46% and 38%, respectively, but seeds collected in 2008 germinated to 60%, 13% and 25%, respectively [150].

8. Summary and Concluding Remarks

In summary, large quantities of seeds of native species are needed for restoration projects, but usually there are not enough seeds to meet the demand. Further, the expenses involved in propagating plants in greenhouses/nurseries and then transplanting them to the field suggest that it would be more cost-effective to sow seeds directly at the restoration sites. Sowing seeds in the field has been tried, but in many (but not all) cases percentages of germination/seedling establishment are very low. However, sowing nondormant seeds in the field during the natural germination season shows some promise for the establishment of a large number of seedlings at the site. A big challenge for people doing restoration is how to break dormancy in large quantities of seeds without having to use elaborate procedures. Fortunately, for people involved in the restoration of natural habitats seeds of many plant families desirable for re-introduction to field sites have nondeep physiological dormancy and will become nondormant during dry storage at room temperatures (afterripening).
Thus, we have reviewed the temperature, seed moisture content and time required for afterripening to occur. Our aims were to make this information available to people who wish to break seed dormancy via afterripening and provide a better understanding of this method to break seed dormancy. This review also has emphasized that afterripening of seeds needs to be carefully monitored so that seeds can be removed from afterripening conditions after they become nondormant and before they die or enter secondary dormancy. Finally, we emphasize that much remains to be learned about seed afterripening, for example, the genes and metabolic pathways that account for dormancy break are not well known. Also, various ecological factors, such as the role of the maternal environment during seed development on afterripening requirements, have received little research attention. Clearly, much additional research needs to be done with regard to the afterripening of seeds.

Author Contributions

Both authors collected literature and wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Department of Biology and the Department of Plant and Soil Sciences at the University of Kentucky for their support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hay, F.R.; Probert, R.J. Advances in seed conservation of wild plant species: A review of recent research. Conserv. Physiol. 2013, 1, cot030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Broadhurst, L.M.; Lowe, A.; Coates, D.J.; Cunningham, S.A.; McDonald, M.; Vesk, P.A.; Yates, C. Seed supply for broadcast restoration: Maximizing evolutionary potential. Evol. Appl. 2008, 1, 587–597. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. Williams, M.I.; Schuman, G.E.; Hild, A.L.; Vicklund, L.E. Wyoming big sagebrush density: Effects of seedling rates and grass competition. Restor. Ecol. 2002, 10, 385–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Brancalion, P.H.S.; Viani, R.A.G.; Aronson, J.; Rodrigues, R.R.; Nave, A.G. Improving planting stocks for the Brazilian Atlantic forest restoration through community-based seed harvesting strategies. Restor. Ecol. 2012, 20, 704–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Silva, A.P.M.; Schweizer, D.; Marques, H.R.; Teixeira, A.M.C.; Santos, V.M.N.; Sambuichi, R.H.R.; Badari, C.G.; Gaudare, U.; Brancalion, P.H.S. Can current native tree seedling production and infrastructure meet an increasing forest restoration demand in Brazil? Restor. Ecol. 2017, 25, 509–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mortlock, W. Local seed for revegetation. Ecol. Manag. Restor. 2000, 1, 93–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Broadhurst, L.; Driver, M.; Guja, L.; North, T.; Vanzella, B.; Fifield, G.; Bruce, S.; Taylor, D.; Bush, D. Seeding the future–the issues of supply and demand in restoration in Australia. Ecol. Manag. Restor. 2015, 16, 29–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Broadhurst, L.; Jones, T.A.; Smith, F.S.; North, T.; Guja, L. Maximizing seed resources for restoration in an uncertain future. BioScience 2016, 66, 73–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Nevill, P.G.; Cross, A.T.; Dixon, K.W. Ethical seed sourcing is a key issue in meeting global restoration targets. Curr. Biol. 2018, 28, R1365–R1381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Schmidt, I.B.; Urzedo, D.I.; Piña-Rodrigues, F.C.M.; Vieira, D.L.M.; Rezende, G.M.; Sampaio, A.B.; Junqueira, F.G.P. Community-based native seed production for restoration in Brazil–role of science and policy. Plant Biol. 2019, 21, 389–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. León-Lobos, P.; Bustamente-Sánchez, M.A.; Nelson, C.R.; Alarcón, D.; Hasbún, R.; Way, M.; Pritchard, H.W.; Armesto, J.J. Lack of adequate seed supply is a major bottleneck for effective ecosystem restoration in Chile: Friendly amendment to Bannister et al. (2018). Restor. Ecol. 2020, 28, 277–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Nevill, P.G.; Tomlinson, S.; Elliott, C.P.; Espeland, E.K.; Dixon, K.W.; Merritt, D.J. Seed production areas for the global restoration challenge. Ecol. Evol. 2016, 6, 7490–7497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Freire, j.M.; Urzedo, D.I.; Piña-Rodrigues, F.C.M. A realidade da sementes nativas no Brasil: Desafios e oportunidades para a producão em largo escala. Seed News 2017, 21, 24–28. [Google Scholar]
  14. Ladouceur, E.; Jiménez-Alfaro, B.; Marin, M.; De Vitis, M.; Abbandonato, H.; Iannetta, P.P.M.; Bonomi, C.; Pritchard, H.W. Native seed supply and the restoration species pool. Conserv. Lett. 2018, 11, e12381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Durigan, G.; Guerin, N.; Costa, J.N.M.N. Ecological restoration of Xingu Basin headwaters: Motivations, engagement, challenges and perspectives. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 2013, 368, 20120165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Oldfield, S. The US national seed strategy for rehabilitation and restoration: Progress and prospects. Plant Biol. 2019, 21, 380–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Elzenga, J.T.M.; Bekker, R.M.; Pritchard, H.W. Maximising the use of native seeds in restoration projects. Plant Biol. 2019, 21, 377–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Palmerlee, A.P.; Young, T.P. Direct seeding is more cost effective than container stock across ten woody species in California. Native Plants J. 2010, 11, 89–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Merritt, D.J.; Dixon, K.W. Restoration seed banks—A matter of scale. Science 2011, 332, 424–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sampaio, A.B.; Vieira, D.L.M.; Holl, K.D.; Pellizzaro, K.F.; Alves, M.; Coutinho, A.G.; Cordeiro, A.; Ribeiro, J.F.; Schmidt, I.B. Lessons on direct seedling to restore Neotropical savanna. Ecol. Eng. 2019, 138, 148–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Wailboonya, P.; Elliott, S. Sowing time and direct seedling success of native tree species for restoring tropical forest ecosystems in northern Thailand. New For. 2020, 51, 81–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Pedrini, S.; Lewandrowksi, W.; Stevens, J.C.; Dixon, K.W. Optimising seed processing techniques to improve germination and sowability of native grasses for ecological restoration. Plant Biol. 2019, 21, 415–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Lewandrowski, W.; Erickson, T.E.; Dixon, K.W.; Stevens, J.C. Increasing the germination envelope under water stress improves seedling emergence in two dominant grass species across different pulse rainfall events. J. Appl. Ecol. 2017, 54, 997–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. James, J.J.; Svejcar, T.J.; Rinella, M.J. Demographic processes limiting seedling recruitment in arid grassland restoration. J. Appl. Ecol. 2011, 48, 961–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Assaeed, A.M. Effect of temperature and water potential on germination of Salsola villosa Del. ex Roem. et Schult. Assiut J. Agric. Sci. 2001, 32, 173–183. [Google Scholar]
  26. Gao, R.; Zhao, R.; Huang, Z.; Yang, X.; Wei, X.; He, Z.; Walck, J.L. Soil temperature and moisture regulate seed dormancy cycling of a dune annual in a temperate desert. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2018, 155, 688–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Pellish, C.A.; Sherrard, M.E.; Leytem, P.A.; Jackson, L.L. Small vertebrate granivores reduce seedling emergence in native tallgrass prairie restoration. Restor. Ecol. 2018, 26, 323–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gibson-Roy, P.; Delpratt, J.; Moore, G. Restoring Western (Basalt) Plains grassland. 2. Field emergence, establishment and recruitment following direct seedlings. Ecol. Manag. Restor. 2007, 8, 123–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Goodwin, J.R.; Doescher, P.S.; Eddleman, L.E. After-ripening in Festuca idahoensis seeds: Adaptive dormancy and implications for restoration. Restor. Ecol. 1995, 3, 137–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Russell, M. Dormancy and germination pre-treatments in Willamette Valley native plants. Northwest Sci. 2011, 85, 389–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kildisheva, O.A.; Hamzeh, B.A.; Davis, A.S. A hard seed to crack, evaluating dormancy-breaking techniques for mamane. Native Plants J. 2013, 14, 243–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Majd, R.; Aghaie, P.; Monfred, E.K.; Elebrahim, M.T. Evaluating some treatments on breaking seed dormancy in mesquite. Int. J. Agron. Plant Prod. 2013, 4, 1433–1439. [Google Scholar]
  33. Kimura, E.; Islam, M.A. Seed scarification methods and their use in forage legumes. Res. J. Seed Sci. 2012, 5, 38–50. [Google Scholar]
  34. Kildisheva, O.A.; Dumroese, R.K.; Davis, A.S. Boiled, tumbled, burned, and heated: Seed scarification techniques for Munro’s globemallow appropriate for large-scale application. Native Plants J. 2013, 14, 43–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Townsend, C.E.; McGinnies, W.J. Mechanical scarification of cicer milkvetch (Astragalus cicer L.) seed crop. Crop Sci. 1972, 12, 392–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Patanè, C.; Gresta, A. Germination of Astragalus hamosus and Medicago orbiculatus as affected by seed-coat dormancy breaking techniques. J. Arid Environ. 2006, 67, 165–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Olszewski, M.W.; Young, C.A. Germination and seedling growth of Desmanthus illinoensis and Desmodium canadense in response to mechanical scarification. HortScience 2010, 45, 1554–1558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. del Egido, L.L.; Toorop, P.E.; Lanfermeijer, F.C. Seed enhancing treatments: Comparative analysis of germination characteristics of 23 key herbaceous species used in European restoration programs. Plant Biol. 2019, 21, 398–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Kildisheva, O.A.; Erickson, T.E.; Madsen, M.D.; Dixon, K.W.; Merritt, D.J. Seed germination and dormancy traits of forbs and shrubs important for restoration of North American dryland ecosystems. Plant Biol. 2019, 21, 458–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Voight, P.W.; Tischler, C.R. Effect of seed treatment on germination and emergence of 3 warm-season grasses. J. Range Manag. 1997, 50, 170–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Valbuena, L.; Vera, M.L. The effects of thermal scarification and seed storage on germination of four heathland species. Plant Ecol. 2002, 161, 137–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Martin, C.C. The role of glumes and gibberellic acid in dormancy of Themeda triandra spikelets. Physiol. Plant. 1975, 33, 171–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Cohn, M.A.; Hughes, J.A. Seed dormancy in red rice (Oryza sativa) I. Effect of temperature on dry-afterripening. Weed Sci. 1981, 29, 402–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lin, J.; Shao, S.; Zhang, N.; Wang, Y.; Mu, C. Lemmas induce dormancy but help the seed of Leymus chinensis to resist drought and salinity conditions in northeast China. PeerJ 2016, 4, e1485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Davis, W.E.; Rose, R.C. The effect of external conditions upon the after-ripening of the seeds of Crataegus mollis. Bot. Gaz. 1912, 54, 49–62. [Google Scholar]
  46. Grushvitzky, I.V. After-ripening of seeds of primitive tribes of angiosperms, conditions and peculiarities. In Physiologie, Okologie und Biochemie der der Keimung; Borris, H., Ed.; Ernst-Moritz-Arnst Universitat: Greifswald, Germany, 1967; Volume 1, pp. 329–336. [Google Scholar]
  47. Crocker, W. Mechanics of dormancy in seeds. Am. J. Bot. 1916, 3, 99–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Crocker, W.; Barton, L.V. Physiology of Seeds; Chronica Botanica Co.: Waltham, MA, USA, 1957. [Google Scholar]
  49. Nikolaeva, M.G. Physiology of Deep Dormancy in Seeds; Translated from Russia by Z. Shapiro; NSF Izdatel’stova, Nauka: Leningrad, Russia; Washington, DC, USA, 1969. [Google Scholar]
  50. Kaye, T.N. Seed dormancy in high elevation plants: Implications for ecology and restoration. In Conservation and Management of Native Plants and Fungi; Kaye, T.N., Love, R.M., Luoma, D.L., Meinke, R.J., Wilson, M.V., Eds.; Native Plant Society of Oregon: Corvallis, OR, USA, 1997; pp. 115–120. [Google Scholar]
  51. Widrlechner, M.P.; Kovach, D.A. Dormancy-breaking protocols for Cuphea seed. Seed Sci. Technol. 2000, 28, 11–27. [Google Scholar]
  52. Gibson-Roy, P.; Delpratt, J.; Moore, G. Restoring the Victorian Western (Basalt) Plains grassland. Laboratory trials for viability and germination, and the implications for direct seedling. Ecol. Manag. Restor. 2007, 8, 114–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Tarasoff, C.S.; Ball, D.A.; Mallory-Smith, C.A. Afterripening requirements and optimal germination temperatures for Nuttall’s alkaligrass (Puccinellia nuttalliana) and weeping alkaligrass (Puccinellia distnas). Weed Sci. 2007, 55, 36–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Cristaudo, A.; Catara, S.; Mingo, A.; Restuccia, A.; Onofri, A. Temperature and storage time strongly affect the germination success of perennial Euphorbia species in Mediterranean regions. Ecol. Evol. 2019, 9, 10984–10999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Baskin, C.C.; Baskin, J.M. Seeds: Ecology, Biogeography and Evolution of Dormancy and Germination, 2nd ed.; Academic Press/Elsevier: San Diego, CA, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  56. Baskin, J.M.; Baskin, C.C. The annual dormancy cycle in buried weed seeds: A continuum. BioScience 1985, 35, 492–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Favier, J.F. A model for germination rate during dormancy loss in Hordeum vulgare. Ann. Bot. 1995, 76, 631–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Soltani, E.; Baskin, C.C.; Baskin, J.M. A graphical method for identifying the six types of non-deep physiological dormancy in seeds. Plant Biol. 2017, 19, 673–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Baskin, J.M.; Baskin, C.C. Germination ecology of Sedum pulchellum Michx. (Crassulaceae). Am. J. Bot. 1977, 64, 1242–1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Batlla, D.; Benech-Arnold, R.L. A framework for the interpretation of temperature effects on dormancy and germination in seed populations showing dormancy. Seed Sci. Res. 2015, 25, 147–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Del Monte, J.P.; Dorado, J. Effects of light conditions and after-ripening time on seed dormancy loss of Bromus diandrus Roth. Weed Res. 2011, 51, 581–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Christensen, M.; Meyer, S.E.; Allen, P.S. A hydrothermal time model of seed after-ripening in Bromus tectorum L. Seed Sci. Res. 1996, 6, 155–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Baskin, J.M.; Baskin, C.C. Germination ecology of Veronica arvensis. J. Ecol. 1983, 71, 57–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Ralowicz, A.E.; Mancino, C.F. Afterripening in curly mesquite seeds. J. Range Manag. 1992, 45, 85–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Moyo, M.; Kulkarni, M.G.; Finnie, J.R.; Van Staden, J. After-ripening, light conditions, and cold stratification influence germination of marula [Sclerocarya birrea (A. Rich.) Hochst. subsp. caffra (Sond.) Kokwarol] seeds. HortScience 2009, 44, 119–124. [Google Scholar]
  66. Kundu, M.; Chaturvedi, N. Preliminary studies on seed dormancy of Schleichera oleosa (Lour.) Merr. Trop. Plant Res. 2019, 6, 133–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Yang, W.; Liu, S.; Yuan, G.; Liu, P.; Qi, D.; Dong, X.; Liu, H.; Liu, G.; Li, X. Germination characteristics among different sheepgrass (Leymus chinensis) germplasm during the seed development and after-ripening stages. PeerJ 2019, 7, e6688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Karimmojeni, H.; Rashidi, B.; Behrozi, D. Effect of different treatments on dormancy-breaking and germination of perennial pepperweed (Lepidium latifolium) (Brassicaceae). Aust. J. Agric. Eng. 2011, 2, 50–55. [Google Scholar]
  69. Favier, J.F.; Woods, J.L. The quantification of dormancy loss in barely (Hordeum vulgare L.). Seed Sci. Technol. 1993, 21, 653–674. [Google Scholar]
  70. Wang, J.H.; Baskin, C.C.; Chen, W.; Du, G.Z. Variation in seed germination between populations of five sub-alpine woody species from eastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau following dry storage at low temperatures. Ecol. Res. 2010, 25, 195–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Widrlechner, M.P. While they were asleep: Do seeds after-ripen in cold storage? Experiences with Calendula. Comb. Proc. Int. Plant Propagators Soc. 2006, 56, 377–382. [Google Scholar]
  72. Schonbeck, M.W.; Egley, G.H. Redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) seed germination responses to afterripening, temperature, ethylene, and some other environmental factors. Weed Sci. 1980, 28, 543–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Bhatt, A.; Pérez-Garcia, F. Seed dormancy of Ochradenus baccatus (Resedaceae), a shrubby species from Arabian desert regions. Rev. Biol. Trop. 2016, 64, 965–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Toole, E.H.; Tooke, V.K.; Borthwick, H.A.; Hendricks, S.B. Changing sensitivity of seeds to light. Plant Physiol. 1957, 32, xi. [Google Scholar]
  75. Pack, D.A. After-ripening and germination of Juniperus seeds. Bot. Gaz. 1921, 71, 32–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Probert, R.J.; Smith, R.D.; Birch, P. Germination responses to light and alternating temperatures in European populations of Dactylis glomerata L. II. The genetic and environmental components of germination. New Phytol. 1985, 99, 317–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Zhou, Y.M.; Lu, J.J.; Tan, D.Y.; Baskin, C.C.; Baskin, J.M. Seed germination ecology of the cold desert annual Isatis violascens (Brassicaceae): Two levels of physiological dormancy and role of the pericarp. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0140983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Baskin, J.M.; Baskin, C.C. Germination ecophysiology of seeds of the winter annual Chaerophyllum tainturieri: A new type of morphophysiological dormancy. J. Ecol. 1990, 78, 993–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Baskin, C.C.; Milberg, P.; Andersson, L.; Baskin, J.M. Nondeep simple morphophysiological dormancy in seeds of the weedy facultative winter annual Papaver rhoeas L. (Papaveraceae). Weed Res. 2002, 42, 194–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Gama-Arachchige, N.S.; Baskin, J.M.; Geneve, R.L.; Baskin, C.C. Quantitative analysis of the thermal requirements for stepwise physical dormancy-break in seeds of the winter annual Geranium carolinianum (Geraniaceae). Ann. Bot. 2013, 111, 849–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Van Assche, J.A.; Vandelook, F.E.A. Combinational dormancy in winter annual Fabaceae. Seed Sci. Res. 2010, 20, 237–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Nativel, N.; Buisson, E.; Silveira, F.A.O. Seed storage-mediated dormancy alleviation in Fabaceae from campo rupestre. Acta Bot. Bras. 2015, 29, 445–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Galíndez, G.; Ortega-Baes, P.; Seal, C.E.; Dawes, M.L.; Scopel, A.L.; Pritchard, H.W. Physical seed dormancy in Collaea argentina (Fabaceae) and Abutilon pauciflorum (Malvaceae) after 4 years storage. Seed Sci. Technol. 2010, 38, 777–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Zhou, S.; Sekizaki, H.; Yang, Z.; Sawa, S.; Pan, J. Phenolics in the seed coat of wild soybean (Glycine soja) and their significance for seed hardness and seed germination. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 10972–10978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Hafenrichter, A.L.; Foster, R.B.; Schwendiman, J.L. Effect of storage at four locations in the west on longevity of forage seeds. Agron. J. 1965, 57, 143–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Carlton, A.E.; Austin, R.D.; Stroh, J.R.; Wiesner, L.E.; Scheetz, J.G. Cicer milkvetch seed germination, scarification, and field emergence studies. Mont. Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 1971, 655, 1–21. [Google Scholar]
  87. Baskin, J.M.; Baskin, C.C. Effect of relative humidity on afterripening and viability in seeds of the winter annual Draba verna. Bot. Gaz. 1979, 140, 284–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Basbouss-Serhal, I.; Leymarie, J.; Bailly, C. Fluctuation of Arabidopsis seed dormancy with relative humidity and temperature during dry storage. J. Exp. Bot. 2016, 67, 119–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Tokumasu, S. Prolongation of seed dormancy by dry storage in Brassica japonica Sieb. J. Jpn. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 1970, 39, 169–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Steadman, K.J.; Crawford, A.D.; Gallagher, R.S. Dormancy release in Lolium rigidum is a function of thermal after-ripening time and seed water content. Funct. Plant Biol. 2003, 30, 345–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Foley, M.E. Temperature and water status of seed affect afterripening in wild oat (Avena fatua). Weed Sci. 1994, 42, 200–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Commander, L.E.; Merritt, D.J.; Rokich, D.P.; Dixon, K.W. The role of after-ripening in promoting germination of arid zone seeds: A study on six Australian species. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2009, 161, 411–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Turner, S.R.; Merritt, D.J.; Renton, M.S.; Dixon, K.W. Seed moisture content affects afterripening and smoke responsiveness in three sympatric Australian native species from fire-prone environments. Austral Ecol. 2009, 34, 866–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Davis, W.E. Primary dormancy, after-ripening, and the development of secondary dormancy in embryos of Ambrosia trifida. Am. J. Bot. 1930, 17, 58–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Allen, P.S.; Meyer, S.E.; Beckstead, J. Patterns of seed after-ripening in Bromus tectorum L. J. Exp. Bot. 1995, 46, 1737–1744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Oba, G.C.; Goneli, A.L.D.; Masetto, T.E.; Filho, C.P.H.; Patricio, V.S.; Sarath, K.L.L. Dormancy of safflower seeds: Effect of storage and cold stratification. J. Seed Sci. 2017, 39, 433–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Foley, M.E. Temperature and moisture status affect afterripening of leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula) seeds. Weed Sci. 2008, 56, 237–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Bazin, J.; Batlla, D.; Dussert, S.; El-Maarouf-Bouteau, H.; Bailly, C. Role of relative humidity, temperature, and water status in dormancy alleviation of sunflower seeds during dry after-ripening. J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62, 627–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Baldos, O.C.; DeFrank, J. Storage humidity and temperature affect dormancy loss and viability of tanglehead (Heteropogon contortus) seeds. HortScience 2014, 49, 1328–1334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Briggs, D.E.; Woods, J.L.; Favier, J.F. Drying and storage treatments for overcoming dormancy in malting barely. J. Inst. Brew. 1994, 100, 271–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Leopold, A.C.; Cohn, M.A. Relationship between water content and afterripening in red rice. Physiol. Plant. 1988, 74, 659–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Gianinetti, A.; Cohn, M.A. Seed dormancy in red rice. XIII: Interaction of dry-afterripening and hydration temperature. Seed Sci. Res. 2008, 18, 151–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Cruz, V.M.V.; Walters, C.T.; Dierig, D.A. Dormancy and after-ripening response of seeds from natural populations and conserved Physaria (syn. Lesquerella) germplasm and their association with environmental and plant parameters. Ind. Crops Prod. 2013, 45, 191–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Ketring, D.L.; Patee, H.E. Ethylene and lipoxygenase in relation to afterripening of dormant NC-13 peanut seeds. Peanut Sci. 1985, 12, 45–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Leubner-Metzger, G. Seed after-ripening and over-expression of class I β-1,3-glucanase confer maternal effects on tobacco testa rupture and dormancy release. Planta 2002, 215, 959–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Holdsworth, M.J.; Bentsink, L.; Soppe, W.J.J. Molecular neworks regulating Arabidopsis seed maturation, after-ripening, dormancy and germination. New Phytol. 2008, 179, 33–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  107. Bazin, J.; Langlade, N.; Vincourt, P.; Arribat, S.; Balzergue, S.; El-Maarouf-Bouteau, H.; Bailley, C. Targeted mRNA regulates sunflower seed dormancy alleviation during dry after-ripening. Plant Cell 2011, 23, 2196–2208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  108. Rodriguez, M.V.; Bodrone, M.P.; Castellari, M.P.; Batlla, D. Effect of storage temperature on dormancy release of sunflower (Helianthus annuus) achenes. Seed Sci. Res. 2018, 28, 101–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Tuttle, K.M.; Martinez, S.A.; Schramm, E.C.; Takebayashi, Y.; Seo, M.; Steber, C.M. Grain dormancy loss is associated with changes in ABA and GA sensitivity and hormone accumulation in bread wheat, Triticum aestivum (L.). Seed Sci. Res. 2015, 25, 179–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Oracz, K.; El-Maarouf-Bouteau, H.; Farrant, J.M.; Cooper, K.; Belghazi, M.; Job, C.; Job, D.; Corbineau, F.; Bailly, C. ROS production and protein oxidation as a novel mechanism for seed dormancy alleviation. Plant J. 2007, 50, 452–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Bahin, E.; Bailly, C.; Sotta, B.; Kranner, I.; Corbineau, F.; Leymarie, J. Crosstalk between reactive oxygen species and hormonal signaling pathways regulates grain dormancy in barley. Plant Cell Environ. 2011, 34, 980–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Buijs, G.; Kodde, J.; Groot, S.P.C.; Bentsink, L. Seed dormancy release accelerated by elevated partial pressure of oxygen is associated with DOG loci. J. Exp. Bot. 2018, 69, 3601–3608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Bailly, C. The signaling role of ROS in the regulation of seed germination and dormancy. Biochem J. 2019, 476, 3019–3032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Kumar, S.P.J.; Prasad, S.R.; Banerjee, R.; Thammineni, C. Seed birth to death: Dual functions of reactive oxygen species in seed physiology. Ann. Bot. 2015, 116, 663–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Meimoun, P.; Mordret, E.; Langlade, N.B.; Balzergue, S.; Arribat, S.; Bailly, C.; El-Maarouf-Bouteau, H. Is gene transcription involved in seed dry after-ripening? PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e86442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Dekkers, B.J.W.; Pearce, S.P.; van Bolderen-Veldkamp, R.P.M.; Holdsworth, M.J.; Bentsink, L. Dormant and after-ripened Arabidopsis thaliana seeds are distinguished by early transcriptional differences in the imbibed state. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  117. Carrera, E.; Holman, T.; Medhurst, A.; Dietrich, D.; Footitt, S.; Theodoublou, F.L.; Holdsworth, M.J. Seed after-ripening is a discrete developmental pathway associated with specific gene networks in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2008, 53, 214–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  118. Gianinetii, A.; Finocchiaro, F.; Bagnaresi, P.; Zechini, A.; Faccioli, P.; Cattivelli, L.; Valè, G.; Biselli, C. Seed dormancy involves a transcriptional program that supports early plastid functionality during imbibition. Plants 2018, 7, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  119. Hou, L.; Wang, M.; Wang, H.; Zhang, W.-H.; Mao, P. Physiological and proteomic analyses for seed dormancy and release in the perennial grass of Leymus chinensis. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2019, 162, 95–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Nakabayashi, K.; Bartsch, M.; Xiang, Y.; Miatton, E.; Pellengahr, S.; Yano, R.; Seo, M.; Sopper, W.J.J. The time required for dormancy release in Arabidopsis is determined by DELAY OF GERMINATION 1 protein levels in freshly matured seeds. Plant Cell 2012, 24, 2826–2838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Nelson, S.K.; Ariizumi, T.; Steber, C.M. Biology in the dry seed: Transcriptome changes associated with dry seed dormancy and dormancy loss in Arabidopsis GA-insensitive sleepy 1-2 mutant. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 2158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Chahtane, H.; Kim, W.; Lopez-Molina, L. Primary seed dormancy: A temporally multilayered riddle waiting to be unlocked. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 857–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Zhang, L.W.; Liu, H.L.; Zhang, D.Y.; Bian, W.G. Seed dormancy release and germination characteristics of Corispermum lehmannianum Bunge, an endemic species in the Gurbantunggut desert of China. Phyton (Buenos Aires) 2015, 84, 58–63. [Google Scholar]
  124. Tilini, K.L.; Meyer, S.E.; Allen, P.S. Breaking primary dormancy in Gibbens’ beard tongue (Penstemon gibbensii) and blowout penstemon (Penstemon haydenii). Native Plants J. 2016, 17, 257–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Richard, G.A.; Cerino, M.C.; Pensiero, J.F.; Zabala, J.M. Seed dormancy and germination in different populations of the Argentinan endemic halophyte grass, Sporobolus phleoides (Poaceae: Chloridoideae). Aust. J. Bot. 2016, 64, 492–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  126. Sun, H.Z.; Lu, J.J.; Tan, D.Y.; Baskin, J.M.; Baskin, C.C. Dormancy and germination characteristics of the trimorphic achenes of Garhadiolus papposus (Asteraceae) an annual ephemeral from the Junggar Desert, China. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2009, 75, 537–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  127. Conner, A.J.; Conner, L.N. Germination and dormancy of Arthoropodium cirratum seeds. N. Z. Nat. Sci. 1988, 15, 3–10. [Google Scholar]
  128. Bochenek, A.; Golaszewski, J.; Piotrowicz-Cieślak, A.I.; Górecki, R.J. The effects of temperature on the dormancy and germination of Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. seeds. Acta Soc. Bot. Pol. 2009, 78, 105–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Wu, C.; Owen, M.D.K. When is the best time to emerge-II: Seed mass, maturation, and afterripening of common waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) natural cohorts. Weed Sci. 2015, 63, 846–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Zheng, Y.; Gao, Y.; An, P.; Shimizu, H.; Rimmington, G.M. Germination characteristics of Agriophyllum squarrosum. Can. J. Bot. 2004, 82, 1662–1670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Gao, R.R.; Yang, X.J.; Yang, F.; Wei, L.L.; Huang, Z.Y.; Walck, J.L. Aerial and soil seed banks enable populations of an annual species to cope with an unpredictable dune ecosystem. Ann. Bot. 2014, 114, 279–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  132. Li, X.H.; Jiang, D.M.; Liu, Z.M.; Li, X.L. Seed germination characteristics of annual species in temperate semi-arid region. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2006, 26, 1194–1199. [Google Scholar]
  133. Tobe, K.; Zhang, L.; Omasa, K. Seed germination and seedling emergence of three annuals growing on desert sand dunes in China. Ann. Bot. 2005, 95, 649–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  134. Fan, S.; Baskin, C.C.; Baskin, J.M.; Wang, Y. The seed ecology of Agriophyllum squarrosum, a pioneer sand dune annual in Central Asia, with particular reference to seed germination. Seed Sci. Res. 2017, 27, 165–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Bradbeer, J.W. Studies in seed dormancy. IV The role of endogenous inhibitors and gibberellin in the dormancy and germination of Corylus avellana L. seeds. Planta 1968, 78, 266–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Wang, B.S.P.; Scheer, G.C.; Coleman, S.J. Effects of Moisture and Storage Temperature on Germination of White Spruce Seeds. In Proceedings of the IUFRO Symposium on Tree Seed Problems with Special Reference to Africa, Ouagoudougou, Barkina Faso, 23–28 November 1993; Some, L.M., de Kam, M., Eds.; Buckhuys Publisher: Leiden, The Netherlands, 1992; pp. 234–238. [Google Scholar]
  137. Pérez-García, F.; González-Benito, M.E.; Gómez-Campo, C. High viability recorded in ultra-dry seeds of 37 seeds of Brassicaceae after almost 40 years of storage. Seed Sci. Technol. 2007, 35, 143–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Bannon, J.S.; Baker, J.B.; Rogers, R.L. Germination of wild poinsettia (Euphorbia heterophylla). Weed Sci. 1978, 26, 221–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Caudra, C.D.; Mansur, L.; Verdugo, G.; Arriagada, L. Deterioration of Leucocoryne spp. seeds as a function of storage time. Agric. Téc. 2002, 62, 46–65. [Google Scholar]
  140. Niane, A.A.; Struik, P.C.; Bishaw, Z. Effects of temperature, relative humidity and moisture content on seed longevity of shrubby Russian thistle (Salsola vermiculata L.). J. Agric. Sci. Technol. B 2013, 3, 623–634. [Google Scholar]
  141. Oba, G.C.; Goneli, A.L.D.; Masetto, T.E.; Hartmann-Filho, C.P.; Michels, K.L.L.S.; Ávila, J.P.C. Artificial drying of safflower seeds at different air temperatures: Effect on the physiological potential of freshly harvested and stored seeds. J. Seed Sci. 2019, 41, 397–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  142. Suma, A.; Sreenivasan, K.; Singh, A.K.; Radhamani, J. Role of relative humidity in processing and storage of seeds and assessment of variability in storage behavior in Brassica spp. and Eruca sativa. Sci. World J. 2013, 2013, 504141. [Google Scholar]
  143. Bradford, K.J.; Dahal, P.; Bello, P. Using relative humidity indicator paper to measure seed and commodity moisture contents. Agric. Environ. Lett. 2016, 1, 160018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  144. Karrfalt, R.P. Equilibrium relative humidity as a tool to monitor seed moisture. USDA For. Serv. Proc. 2010, RMRS-P62, 45–47. [Google Scholar]
  145. Whitehouse, K.J.; Hay, F.R.; Ellis, R.H. Increases in the longevity of desiccation-phase developing rice seeds: Response to high-temperature drying depends on harvest moisture content. Ann. Bot. 2015, 116, 247–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  146. Karrfalt, R.P. Seed moisture content, relative humidity, and better storage of longleaf pine seed. Tree Plant. Notes 2017, 60, 63–69. [Google Scholar]
  147. Stanisavjević, R.; Dragićević, V.; Milenković, J.; Djukanović, L.; Djokić, D.; Terzić, D.; Dodig, D. Effects of the duration of after-ripening period on seed germinations and seedling size in three fescue species. Span. J. Agric. Res. 2010, 8, 454–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  148. Edwards, B.R.; Burghardt, L.T.; Zapata-Garcia, M.; Donohue, K. Maternal temperature effects on dormancy influence germination responses to water availability in Arabidopsis thaliana. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2016, 126, 55–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  149. Gozlan, S.; Gutterman, Y. Dry storage temperatures, duration, and salt concentrations affect germination of local and edaphic ecotypes of Hordeum spontaneum (Poaceae) from Israel. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 1999, 67, 163–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Veatch-Blohm, M.E.; Koutavas, E. The effect of stratification and after-ripening time on seed germination of three populations of Arabidopsis lyrata ssp. lyrata (Brassicaceae). Castanea 2011, 76, 199–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table
Table 1. The most effective conditions for afterripening of seeds of various species. Authorities are given only for species not mentioned in the text.
Table 1. The most effective conditions for afterripening of seeds of various species. Authorities are given only for species not mentioned in the text.
Species Moisture Content (%) Temperature (°C) Time References
Austrostipa elegantissima 7.1–13.223 6 mo[93]
Avena fatua 10–2040 3 mo[91]
Bromus tectorum 7-8 20, 30 4 mo[95]
Carthamus tinctorius 7.2–8.8 24.7 8 mo[96]
Conostylis candicans 11.82336 mo[93]
Euphorbia esula L. 2.6304–8 mo[97]
Helianthus annuus 0.05 a20 1 wk[98]
0.04 a 15, 20 3 wk
Heteropogon contortus (L.) P.Beauv.
ex Roem. and Schult.		 5.73012 mo[99]
Hordeum vulgare 1238 4 mo[100]
1227 6 mo
Oryza sativa (weedy rice) 6–1425 1.5 mo[101]
Oryza sativa (weedy rice) 10.830 2 mo[102]
Physaria fendleri (A. Gray) O’Kane
and Al-Shehbaz		 4.7535 3 mo[103]
Stylidium affine Sond. 5.0–6.1 23 3 mo[93]
8.1–12.123 3 mo
Zygophyllum fruticulosum DC. 5.730 12 mo[92]
5.745 10 mo
a g H2O [g dw]−1.
Table
Table 2. Storage conditions that promoted afterripening, but a prolonged period at these conditions resulted in seed death. Authorities are given only for species not mentioned in the text.
Table 2. Storage conditions that promoted afterripening, but a prolonged period at these conditions resulted in seed death. Authorities are given only for species not mentioned in the text.
Species Moisture ConditionsTemperature (°C)Time to Death (months)References
Arabidopsis thaliana75% RH10, 15, 20, 2515.8[88]
Draba verna 70–100% RH256[87]
Euphorbia esula≥ 9% MC306[97]
Euphorbia heterophylla L.10.8% MC256[138]
18.6% MC253
18.6% MC56
Heteropogon contortus 75% eRH a20, 306[99]
Hordeum vulgare12% MC38 5.3[100]
9.4% MC38 8.3
10.3% MC38 6–7.5
Leucocoryne spp.room conditionsroom72[139]
Salsola vermiculata L. 9.6% MC2424[140]
a Seeds equilibrated with 75% RH.
Table
Table 3. Some examples of final % seed MC after seeds were allowed to equilibrate with 40% and 50% RH. Authorities are given only for species not mentioned in the text.
Table 3. Some examples of final % seed MC after seeds were allowed to equilibrate with 40% and 50% RH. Authorities are given only for species not mentioned in the text.
% Seed MC after Equilibration at
Species 40% RH50% RHReferences
Amaranthus tricolor L.8.9510.28[143]
Apium graveolens L.6.797.82[143]
Beta vulgaris L.8.9710.30[143]
Brassica juncea (L.) Czern.- a 5.08–5.58[142]
Brassica napus L.- a 4.91–5.84[142]
Brassica nigra (L.) Koch6.817.85[143]
Chenopodium album L.8.669.95[143]
Chenopodium foliosum Asch.9.3010.67[143]
Dahlia pinnata Cav.7.299.10[143]
Daucus carota L.7.768.92[143]
Eruca sativa Mill.- a 5.37–5.71[142]
Fraxinus pennsylvanica Marshall7.147.86[144]
Hordeum vulgare9.3510.73[143]
Lolium rigidum8.8910.0[90]
Oryza sativa10.011.88[145]
Pinus palustris Mill.6.757.63[146]
Zea mays L.9.0410.37[143]
a no data.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Baskin, C.C.; Baskin, J.M. Breaking Seed Dormancy during Dry Storage: A Useful Tool or Major Problem for Successful Restoration via Direct Seeding? Plants 2020, 9, 636. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9050636

AMA Style

Baskin CC, Baskin JM. Breaking Seed Dormancy during Dry Storage: A Useful Tool or Major Problem for Successful Restoration via Direct Seeding? Plants. 2020; 9(5):636. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9050636

Chicago/Turabian Style

Baskin, Carol C., and Jerry M. Baskin. 2020. "Breaking Seed Dormancy during Dry Storage: A Useful Tool or Major Problem for Successful Restoration via Direct Seeding?" Plants 9, no. 5: 636. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9050636

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop