Next Article in Journal
Behaviour Change Techniques in Weight Gain Prevention Interventions in Adults of Reproductive Age: Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression
Previous Article in Journal
Malnutrition and Increased Risk of Adverse Outcomes in Elderly Patients Undergoing Elective Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Case-Control Study Nested in a Cohort
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nutrients
Volume 14
Issue 1
10.3390/nu14010208
nutrients-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Standardized Hydrangea serrata (Thunb.) Ser. Leaves Extract on Body Weight and Body Fat Reduction in Overweight or Obese Humans: A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study

by
Hee-Soo Han
1,2,
Kyung-Sook Chung
1,
Yu-Kyong Shin
3,
Jae-Sik Yu
3,
Seung-Hyun Kang
4,
Sun-Hee Lee
3,* and
Kyung-Tae Lee
1,2,*
1
Department of Pharmaceutical Biochemistry, College of Pharmacy, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Korea
2
Department of Life and Nanopharmaceutical Sciences, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Korea
3
Department of New Material Development, COSMAXBIO, Seongnam 13486, Korea
4
Clinical Research Center of H PLUS Yangji Hospital, Sillim-dong, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08779, Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2022, 14(1), 208; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14010208
Submission received: 7 December 2021 / Revised: 27 December 2021 / Accepted: 31 December 2021 / Published: 3 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Phytochemicals and Human Health)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Obesity is a major health problem that is caused by body fat accumulation and that can lead to metabolic diseases. Owing to several side effects of the currently used antiobesity drugs, natural plants have risen as safe and potential candidates to alleviate obesity. We have previously reported the antiobesity effect of Hydrangea serrata (Thunb.) Ser. leaves extract (WHS) and its underlying mechanisms. As an extension of our preclinical studies, this study aimed to investigate the effect of WHS on body weight and body fat reduction in overweight or obese humans. A total of 93 healthy overweight or obese males and females, aged 19–65 years, with body mass indexes (BMIs) ≥ 25 and <32 kg/m2, were recruited and received either an oral administration of 600 mg of WHS, or placebo tablets for 12 weeks. Daily supplementation with WHS decreased body weights, body fat masses, and BMIs compared with the placebo-treated group. The hip circumferences, visceral fat areas, abdominal fat areas, and visceral-to-subcutaneous ratios decreased after WHS supplementation. No significant side effects were observed during or after the 12 weeks of WHS intake. In conclusion, WHS, which has beneficial effects on body weight and body fat reduction, could be a promising antiobesity supplement that does not produce any side effects.

1. Introduction

Overweight and obesity are emerging health problems that can occur across ages, sexes, and races. The etiology of obesity is highly complex and includes genetic, physiological, environmental, social, and economic factors, in addition to a high-energy intake relative to the energy expenditure, which is the most common cause of obesity [1]. It is not only a cosmetic problem but also a health threat that increases the occurrence of metabolic diseases, such as type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), cardiovascular disease (CVD), hyperlipidemia, fatty liver disease, and several types of cancers [2,3].
The degree of obesity is categorized by the body mass index (BMI), which is defined as a 18 ≤ BMI < 25 kg/m2 as the normal range, a 25 ≤ BMI < 30 kg/m2 as the overweight range, and a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 as the obese range [4]. Obese people often need to be medicated to manage their weight and excess body fat accumulation. Current agents for weight loss exert their effects by regulating appetite and fat absorption from the gut. As appetite suppressants, such as diethyl propion, fluoxetine, and lorcaserin, generally affect the central nervous system (CNS), they can induce other CNS effects, such as nervousness, insomnia, anxiety, and depression [5]. Xenical (orlistat), which blocks fat digestion and absorption by inhibiting lipase activity, can have gastrointestinal side effects, including steatorrhea and diarrhea. Therefore, as the global market for nutraceuticals grows, numerous bioactive materials from natural sources have been investigated and developed as health supplements to mitigate obesity without severe side effects [6]. For example, Cissus quadrangularis extract inhibited lipid accumulation by downregulating the expression of adipogenesis/lipogenesis-related proteins [7]. Moro orange juice intake reduced body weight and lipid accumulation in both obese mice and humans [8,9]. Epigallocatechin-3-gallate from green tea has the potential to increase fat oxidation and thermogenesis [10,11]. Moreover, astaxanthin, a marine carotenoid that possesses antioxidant activity, prevented the pathological remodeling of adipose tissue and stimulated mitochondrial biogenesis in muscle [12,13].
Hydrangea leaves extract is included in the list of GRAS (Generally Recognized as Safe Substance), and is therefore recognized as safe for eating or drinking as foods. It is widely consumed as a form of herbal tea, named “Gamrocha” or “Amacha”, meaning “sweet taste” in Korea and Japan [14]. We previously reported the potential of the hot water extract of Hydrangea serrata (Thunb.) Ser. leaves (WHS) to reduce body weight and body fat weight [15,16]. AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) is a crucial intracellular energy sensor that regulates energy homeostasis in various tissues, such as the liver, skeletal muscle, and adipose tissue [17]. In white adipose tissue (WAT), AMPK regulates lipogenesis and lipolysis by decreasing fatty acid (FA) uptake and increasing FA oxidation [18]. AMPK also modulates the thermogenesis by activating PGC-1α in brown adipose tissue (BAT), which dissipates energy as heat [19]. That is to say, AMPK can be a major molecular target for alleviating obesity by regulating both adipogenesis and thermogenesis. We found that the oral administration of WHS exhibits an antiobesity effect by regulating both adipogenesis and thermogenesis by targeting AMPK activation in obese mice [15,16]. As an extension of our preclinical studies, we investigated whether WHS exerts a potent inhibitory effect on body weight and body fat weight in overweight or obese humans, and discovered promise in the development of WHS as a health supplement for ameliorating obesity.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Test Material

A hot water extract from the leaves of H. serrata was prepared in the form of a tablet. Test tablets (600 mg WHS) and placebo tablets were prepared, as described previously [20]. The placebo tablets used in this study were indistinguishable from the test tablets.

2.2. Subjects

Healthy males and females, aged 19–65 years, with BMIs from 25 to <32 kg/m2 at Visit 1 and Visit 2 were recruited for this study (Figure 1). The subjects were informed of the objective and protocol of the study, and the foreseeable risks involved in the trial. All participants voluntarily signed a written informed consent form. The subjects were evaluated for eligibility according to the exclusion criteria, as follows: (1) Those who are receiving treatment for serious diseases (e.g., cardiovascular, immunological, respiratory, hepatobiliary, renal, neurological, musculoskeletal, mental, and infectious diseases, or malignant tumor); (2) Those who have taken any bariatric drugs for losing weight (e.g., anorexiants, fat absorption inhibitors, GLP-1 receptor agonists), psychiatric drugs for depression and schizophrenia, β-blockers, diuretics, contraceptives, steroids, female hormonal injections, or additional health supplements for weight control within one month of Visit 1; (3) Uncontrolled hypertensive patients who have a 160/100 mmHg or higher blood pressure after a 10-min rest; (4) Those whose fasting plasma glucose levels are 126 mg/dL or higher, or diabetic patients taking antidiabetic drugs (insulin, hypoglycemic agents); (5) Those whose TSH levels are ≤0.1 μIU/mL or ≥10 μIU/mL; (6) Those whose creatinine levels are two times higher than the normal standard; (7) Those whose AST (GOT) or ALT (GPT) levels are three times higher than the normal standard; (8) Those who have severe gastrointestinal disorder; (9) Those who have been hospitalized, treated with drugs, or rehabilitated because of alcohol use, alcohol-induced disorders, heart disease, or central nervous system disorders; (10) Those who suffer from musculoskeletal disorder; (11) Those who have had a weight change of 10% or more within three months of Visit 1; (12) Those who have participated in a commercial obesity program within three months of Visit 1; (13) Those who have participated or plan to participate in other interventional clinical trials (including human clinical trials) within three months of Visit 1; (14) Women who had undergone, or planned to undergo, pregnancy or nursing during the trials; (15) Those who are sensitive or allergic to ingredients included in the test formulation; (16) Those who are considered to be inappropriate to participate in the study by the investigator.

2.3. Study Design

The study design is illustrated in Figure 1. Before proceeding with this randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical study, it was determined whether the participants met the inclusion/exclusion criteria through a screening visit (Visit 1). A total of 189 applicants were enrolled, and 120 subjects were selected, and were randomly assigned to the control (placebo) and test (WHS) groups in a 1:1 ratio at Visit 2 (60 participants were allocated to each group). The participants were instructed to take a 600-mg WHS or placebo tablet with water once daily for 12 weeks. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of H Plus Yangji Hospital (HYJ 2020-04-003-014). This trial was registered at the Clinical Research Information Service (CRiS), Republic of Korea (KCT0005594, https://cris.nih.go.kr/cris/search/detailSearch.do/18021 accessed on 1 December 2021).

2.4. Sample Size Determination and Power Calculation

We expected the clinically significant change in our primary outcome, the body fat mass, on the basis of the previously reported study that is the same as our trial. The changes in the body fat masses from baseline were −2.4 ± 1.7 kg and −3.8 ± 2.4 kg in the placebo and the test groups, respectively, and the pooled standard deviation (SD) value is 2.07 (σ) [21]. We set the difference in the body fat mass between the placebo and the test groups (Δ) conservatively, as −1.23. We estimated the sample size using a superiority test and a two-sided test, and considering type 1 (α) and type 2 (β) errors of 0.05 and 0.2 with an 80% power, respectively. The sample size was calculated using the equation as follows: n = {(Zα/2 + Zβ)2 × σ2 × 2}/Δ2. The Zα/2 and Zβ signify the critical values that the areas of the right tail become at α/2 and β, respectively. On the basis of the above equation, the minimum sample size is calculated as n = 45 per group in this study. Considering the 25% drop-out rate, we determined a sample size of n = 60 per group.

2.5. Clinical Outcomes

The primary efficacy outcome was a reduction in the body fat mass from baseline to 12 weeks (Visit 4), after randomization. The body fat mass was analyzed using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). The secondary efficacy outcomes included changes in the body weight, the waist and hip circumferences, the waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), the body mass index (BMI), the body fat percentage, the visceral and subcutaneous fat areas, the total abdominal fat area, the visceral-to-subcutaneous ratio (VSR), blood lipids (e.g., total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol, and triglyceride (TG)), adiponectin, and leptin. The visceral and subcutaneous fat areas and the total abdominal fat area were assessed from the space of the L4–L5 intervertebral, using a computerized tomography (CT) scanner.
The safety was assessed by monitoring all of the adverse events and results from the blood chemical tests, including aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and γ-glutamyl transpeptidase (γ-GTP) for the liver function tests, blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and creatinine for the renal function tests, and high sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) for the inflammatory status. The vital signs (blood pressure and pulse) of the subjects were measured.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using the SAS® system (Version 9.4, SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). The full analysis and per-protocol datasets were used for the statistical analyses. The significant differences in the baseline demographic characteristics were analyzed using the Chi-square test, the Fisher’s exact test, or the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. The significance of the differences in the changes before and after intake (compared within groups) was analyzed using a paired t-test, and the differences in the degree of changes between the groups were analyzed by performing a two-sample t-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test. In addition, a generalized linear model (GLM) was conducted with the variables, gender, age, drinking, smoking, and exercise, as co-variates. It was planned that the GLM was to be conducted if there was any significant difference between the base characteristic groups, but there was no statistically significant difference among the base characteristic groups. The data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). The differences were considered statistically significant at a p-value < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Baseline Characteristics of Subjects

Of the 189 volunteers, 120 participants who met the criteria were randomly allocated to the test and placebo groups and were administered the WHS and placebo tablets, respectively. Five participants from the WHS group and nine from the placebo group withdrew from the study. Three participants each from the WHS and placebo groups did not appear in the trial. Therefore, 52 and 48 participants administered the WHS and placebo, respectively, completing the study (Figure 2). Participants with less than 80% compliance were excluded from the per-protocol set analysis. The demographic characteristics of the participants are tabulated in Table 1. There were no significant differences in the general baseline characteristics of the subjects, such as sex, age, drinking, and smoking, between the two groups.

3.2. Effect of WHS on the Reduction of Fat Mass and Fat Percentage

As the primary outcome for the efficacy evaluation, the changes in the body fat masses of the subjects were determined through DEXA scans. As shown in Figure 3A,B, the body fat masses were significantly decreased when the WHS was administered for 12 weeks (p = 0.0130), which contrastively increased in the subjects treated with the placebo. The change in the body fat mass of the WHS group decreased by 991.71 ± 2660.98 g, whereas that of the placebo group increased by 312.91 ± 1379.49 g, after 12 weeks of oral intake, which showed statistically significant differences between the two groups (p = 0.0049). Although there were no significant differences before and after the experiment within the groups, we observed a significant difference in the change in the fat percentage between the two groups (p = 0.0467, Figure 3C,D). The body fat percentage in the WHS group was reduced by 0.57 ± 2.46%, whereas it was increased in the placebo group by 0.31 ± 1.39% from the baseline. The maximum changes in the body fat masses and fat percentages were −6504.00 g and −6.80%, respectively, after 12 weeks of WHS administration.

3.3. Effect of WHS on Body Weight and BMI

The body weights and BMIs of all the subjects were measured at Visits 3 and 4 (after 6 weeks and 12 weeks of oral intake, respectively). The body weights of the WHS group gradually decreased by 0.40 ± 2.15 kg (p = 0.2015) and 1.75 ± 3.21 (p = 0.0004) kg after 6 and 12 weeks, respectively (Figure 4A); however, there was no significant difference in the body weights of the placebo group. As shown in Figure 4B, the mean changes in the body weights between the two groups showed significant differences at both Visits 3 and 4 (p = 0.0480 and p = 0.0020, respectively). The maximum changes in the body weights of the WHS group were −5.60 kg and −11.90 kg after 6 and 12 weeks, respectively. The BMIs of the WHS group also reduced by 0.17 ± 0.77 kg/m2 (p = 0.1371) and 0.64 ± 1.19 kg/m2 (p = 0.0005) after 6 and 12 weeks, respectively (Figure 4C), which showed significant differences compared with the placebo group at Visits 3 and 4 (p = 0.0433 and p = 0.0026, respectively, Figure 4D). The maximum changes in the BMIs were −2.30 kg/m2 and −4.90 kg/m2, after 6 and 12 weeks of WHS intake, respectively.

3.4. Effect of WHS on the Waist and Hip Circumferences

As shown in Figure 5A, the waist circumferences in both groups had significantly decreased after 6 weeks (p = 0.0111 in the placebo group, and p = 0.0023 in the WHS group) and 12 weeks of intake (p = 0.0005 in the placebo group, and p < 0.0001 in the WHS group). Although the reduction in the waist circumferences was greater in the WHS group (−3.65 ± 5.71 cm) than in the placebo group (−2.59 ± 4.63 cm), there was no significant difference between the two groups (Figure 5B). The hip circumference of the WHS group was gradually decreased during the experiment, whereas no such change was observed in the placebo group (Figure 5C). There were significant differences in the hip circumferences between the two groups after 12 weeks (Figure 5D).

3.5. Effect of WHS on Body Fat Area

CT scans were performed to analyze the abdominal fat areas. According to the within-group analyses, the visceral fat areas (VFAs), the total abdominal fat areas, and the visceral-to-subcutaneous fat ratios (VSRs), but not the SFAs, had significantly decreased after 12 weeks of WHS ingestion, whereas the placebo-treated groups showed no significant differences in these parameters (Figure 6A–D). The maximum changes in the VFA, SFA, total abdominal fat area, and VSR were about two times larger in the WHS group (−101.11 cm2, −160.87 cm2, −223.02 cm2, and −1.01, respectively) than in the placebo group (−53.18 cm2, −85.94 cm2, −115.87 cm2, and −0.39, respectively). Significant differences were also observed between the two groups in the changes in these parameters from the baseline, except for the SFAs (Figure 6E–H).

3.6. Effect of WHS on the Plasma Levels of Lipid Metabolism Markers and Adipokines

The plasma levels of the total cholesterol, HDL, LDL, and TG were analyzed at the start and at the end of the experiment. As shown in Table 2, all of the parameters, except for the total cholesterol, tended to decrease in both the placebo and WHS groups. The plasma LDL levels of the placebo-treated subjects and the plasma TG levels of the WHS-treated subjects were significantly reduced after 12 weeks. However, there were no significant differences in these parameters between the two groups. Table 3 shows the levels of plasma adipokines, including adiponectin and leptin. According to the intergroup comparison, the adiponectin levels decreased in the WHS group and, significantly decreased in the placebo group. The leptin levels in the WHS group tended to decrease, while those in the placebo group remained almost unchanged; however, these changes did not show any significant differences within and between the groups.

3.7. Safety Evaluation of WHS

The plasma levels of AST, ALT, γ-GTP, creatinine, BUN, and hs-CRP, and the resting blood pressure and pulse rates were measured to evaluate the safety of WHS (Table 4). These parameters were within the normal ranges and did not change significantly, indicating that the daily intake of WHS for 12 weeks did not cause any side effects.

4. Discussion

The adipose tissues are mainly divided into two depots: subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT), and visceral adipose tissue (VAT). Emerging evidence suggests that the overloaded fat in SAT, which reaches its storage limit, causes ectopic fat accumulation at undesired sites, including at the heart, liver, muscle, and VAT [22]. As excessive ectopic fat induces regional inflammation and insulin resistance by secreting proinflammatory cytokines and adipokines, VAT is believed to be more strongly associated with the development of metabolic diseases, such as CVD and T2DM, compared to SAT [23]. In addition to the absolute fat mass or area, the VSR is a metric of the body fat distribution that is correlated with cardiometabolic risk: the higher it is, the higher the risk for CVD [24]. In this study, the oral ingestion of WHS significantly reduced VFA and VSR compared with the placebo-treated group. These results suggest that WHS could not only ameliorate body fat accumulation, but also prevent the progression of obesity-induced metabolic syndromes. Analyzing the correlations between the fat mass and the parameters related to the metabolic syndromes, including the insulin sensitivity and glycemia of WHS, could support this assumption.
Leptin is a hormone that is primarily secreted by adipocytes; therefore, circulating leptin levels directly reflect the fat mass stored in adipose tissue [25]. We previously found that WHS inhibits plasma leptin levels in obese mice [15]. However, the plasma leptin levels showed no significant difference between the placebo- and WHS-administrated groups in this study. Considering the different lifespans of mice and humans [26], we expected that WHS could significantly inhibit the plasma leptin levels with long-term supplementation. In our preclinical studies, WHS was found to reduce the total cholesterol, and the LDL and TG levels in mouse plasma [15,16]. However, these lipid profiles were almost unchanged or decreased in both the placebo- and WHS-administrated groups in this study, with no statistical differences between the groups. As the subjects recruited in the present study were overweight or obese, but otherwise healthy, without any signs of metabolic syndromes, these parameters were within the normal range and the changes were not significant.
Although various botanical sources have been reported to have antiobesity activities in preclinical studies, some of them, including Garcinia cambogia extract [27,28], green tea extract [29], and glucomannan [30], have failed to promote weight loss in humans. Instead, mixed plant extracts containing Garcinia cambogia, Coffea Arabica, and green tea have shown a significant weight loss effect, which is similar to that of WHS alone [31,32]. Although Puer tea extract, Ephedra sinica extract, and Yerba Mate each exhibited their inhibitory effects on the body weight and body fat mass, the doses were somewhat high (3 g/day, 4 g/day, and 3 g/day, respectively) [33,34,35]. It is noteworthy that WHS showed comparable antiobesity potential at a relatively low dose (600 mg) in this study. In our previous studies, we identified the chemical constituents of the extract of Hydrangea serrata leaves and identified hydrangenol as an active compound of WHS concerning the antiphotoaging activities [36,37,38]. Likewise, we expected the antiobesity potential of hydrangenol and are planning to investigate it.
During the clinical trials, the symptom severities of the adverse reactions that occurred in the WHS group were nine mild and eight moderate cases. With regard to the relevance to the test food for human application, two cases were declared “possibly related”, while fourteen cases were declared “possibly unrelated”, and one case was declared “definitely unrelated” by the investigator. The two abnormal reactions possibly related to WHS included menstrual pain and stomach pain, which were treated with the drugs and found to be completely cured. Although the causality relationship between the adverse reactions and the test product needs to be determined, it seems that these side effects are rare and negligible.

5. Conclusions

The present study demonstrated the efficacy and safety of WHS in overweight or obese humans. A daily intake of 600 mg of WHS for 12 weeks significantly decreased body weight and fat mass, with a reduction in the BMI, body fat percentage, hip circumference, VFA, total abdominal fat area, and VSR. To fully determine the efficacy and possible side effects of WHS, a larger sample size with a longer application is needed. With this evidence, the development of WHS as a potential weight loss supplement is promising.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.-H.L.; methodology, S.-H.K.; investigation, S.-H.K.; resources, Y.-K.S. and S.-H.L.; data curation, S.-H.K.; writing—original draft preparation, H.-S.H.; writing—review and editing, K.-S.C., J.-S.Y. and K.-T.L.; visualization, H.-S.H.; supervision, S.-H.L.; project administration, S.-H.L.; funding acquisition, S.-H.L. and K.-T.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Korea Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture and Forestry (IPET) through the Useful Agricultural Life Resources Industry Technology Development Program, funded by the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (MAFRA) (120047-2).

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of H Plus Yangji Hospital (HYJ 2020-04-003-014).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wright, S.M.; Aronne, L.J. Causes of obesity. Abdom. Imaging 2012, 37, 730–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Polyzos, S.A.; Kountouras, J.; Mantzoros, C.S. Obesity and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: From pathophysiology to therapeutics. Metabolism 2019, 92, 82–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chooi, Y.C.; Ding, C.; Magkos, F. The epidemiology of obesity. Metabolism 2019, 92, 6–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Pi-Sunyer, F.X. Obesity: Criteria and classification. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2000, 59, 505–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Weight Loss Agents. In LiverTox: Clinical and Research Information on Drug-Induced Liver Injury; National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases: Bethesda, MD, USA, 2012.
  6. Chang, E.; Kim, C.Y. Natural Products and Obesity: A Focus on the Regulation of Mitotic Clonal Expansion during Adipogenesis. Molecules 2019, 24, 1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Lee, H.J.; Le, B.; Lee, D.R.; Choi, B.K.; Yang, S.H. Cissus quadrangularis extract (CQR-300) inhibits lipid accumulation by downregulating adipogenesis and lipogenesis in 3T3-L1 cells. Toxicol. Rep. 2018, 5, 608–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Titta, L.; Trinei, M.; Stendardo, M.; Berniakovich, I.; Petroni, K.; Tonelli, C.; Riso, P.; Porrini, M.; Minucci, S.; Pelicci, P.G.; et al. Blood orange juice inhibits fat accumulation in mice. Int. J. Obes. 2010, 34, 578–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Cardile, V.; Graziano, A.C.; Venditti, A. Clinical evaluation of Moro (Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck) orange juice supplementation for the weight management. Nat. Prod. Res. 2015, 29, 2256–2260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Boschmann, M.; Thielecke, F. The effects of epigallocatechin-3-gallate on thermogenesis and fat oxidation in obese men: A pilot study. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 2007, 26, 389S–395S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lee, M.S.; Kim, C.T.; Kim, Y. Green tea (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate reduces body weight with regulation of multiple genes expression in adipose tissue of diet-induced obese mice. Ann. Nutr. Metab. 2009, 54, 151–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Nawaz, A.; Nishida, Y.; Takikawa, A.; Fujisaka, S.; Kado, T.; Aminuddin, A.; Nishimura, A.; Kuwano, T.; Watanabe, Y.; Igarashi, Y.; et al. Astaxanthin, a Marine Carotenoid, Maintains the Tolerance and Integrity of Adipose Tissue and Contributes to Its Healthy Functions. Nutrients 2021, 13, 4374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Nishida, Y.; Nawaz, A.; Kado, T.; Takikawa, A.; Igarashi, Y.; Onogi, Y.; Wada, T.; Sasaoka, T.; Yamamoto, S.; Sasahara, M.; et al. Astaxanthin stimulates mitochondrial biogenesis in insulin resistant muscle via activation of AMPK pathway. J. Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2020, 11, 241–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Jung, C.H.; Kim, Y.; Kim, M.S.; Lee, S.; Yoo, S.H. The establishment of efficient bioconversion, extraction, and isolation processes for the production of phyllodulcin, a potential high intensity sweetener, from sweet hydrangea leaves (Hydrangea macrophylla Thunbergii). Phytochem. Anal. 2016, 27, 140–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Han, H.S.; Lee, H.H.; Gil, H.S.; Chung, K.S.; Kim, J.K.; Kim, D.H.; Yoon, J.; Chung, E.K.; Lee, J.K.; Yang, W.M.; et al. Standardized hot water extract from the leaves of Hydrangea serrata (Thunb.) Ser. alleviates obesity via the AMPK pathway and modulation of the gut microbiota composition in high fat diet-induced obese mice. Food Funct. 2021, 12, 2672–2685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Han, H.S.; Chung, K.S.; Shin, Y.K.; Lee, S.H.; Lee, K.T. Standardized Hydrangea serrata (Thunb.) Ser. Extract Ameliorates Obesity in db/db Mice. Nutrients 2021, 13, 3624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, B.B.; Zhou, G.; Li, C. AMPK: An emerging drug target for diabetes and the metabolic syndrome. Cell Metab. 2009, 9, 407–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Kola, B.; Grossman, A.B.; Korbonits, M. The role of AMP-activated protein kinase in obesity. Front. Horm Res. 2008, 36, 198–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Wu, L.; Zhang, L.; Li, B.; Jiang, H.; Duan, Y.; Xie, Z.; Shuai, L.; Li, J.; Li, J. AMP-Activated Protein Kinase (AMPK) Regulates Energy Metabolism through Modulating Thermogenesis in Adipose Tissue. Front. Physiol. 2018, 9, 122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Myung, D.B.; Lee, J.H.; Han, H.S.; Lee, K.Y.; Ahn, H.S.; Shin, Y.K.; Song, E.; Kim, B.H.; Lee, K.H.; Lee, S.H.; et al. Oral Intake of Hydrangea serrata (Thunb.) Ser. Leaves Extract Improves Wrinkles, Hydration, Elasticity, Texture, and Roughness in Human Skin: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study. Nutrients 2020, 12, 1588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Nosaka, N.; Maki, H.; Suzuki, Y.; Haruna, H.; Ohara, A.; Kasai, M.; Tsuji, H.; Aoyama, T.; Okazaki, M.; Igarashi, O.; et al. Effects of margarine containing medium-chain triacylglycerols on body fat reduction in humans. J. Atheroscler. Thromb. 2003, 10, 290–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Kwon, H.; Kim, D.; Kim, J.S. Body Fat Distribution and the Risk of Incident Metabolic Syndrome: A Longitudinal Cohort Study. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 10955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Bjorndal, B.; Burri, L.; Staalesen, V.; Skorve, J.; Berge, R.K. Different adipose depots: Their role in the development of metabolic syndrome and mitochondrial response to hypolipidemic agents. J. Obes. 2011, 2011, 490650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Kaess, B.M.; Pedley, A.; Massaro, J.M.; Murabito, J.; Hoffmann, U.; Fox, C.S. The ratio of visceral to subcutaneous fat, a metric of body fat distribution, is a unique correlate of cardiometabolic risk. Diabetologia 2012, 55, 2622–2630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Iikuni, N.; Lam, Q.L.; Lu, L.; Matarese, G.; La Cava, A. Leptin and Inflammation. Curr. Immunol. Rev. 2008, 4, 70–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Dutta, S.; Sengupta, P. Men and mice: Relating their ages. Life Sci. 2016, 152, 244–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Heymsfield, S.B.; Allison, D.B.; Vasselli, J.R.; Pietrobelli, A.; Greenfield, D.; Nunez, C. Garcinia cambogia (hydroxycitric acid) as a potential antiobesity agent: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 1998, 280, 1596–1600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Kim, J.E.; Jeon, S.M.; Park, K.H.; Lee, W.S.; Jeong, T.S.; McGregor, R.A.; Choi, M.S. Does Glycine max leaves or Garcinia Cambogia promote weight-loss or lower plasma cholesterol in overweight individuals: A randomized control trial. Nutr. J. 2011, 10, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Hsu, C.H.; Tsai, T.H.; Kao, Y.H.; Hwang, K.C.; Tseng, T.Y.; Chou, P. Effect of green tea extract on obese women: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Clin. Nutr. 2008, 27, 363–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Keithley, J.K.; Swanson, B.; Mikolaitis, S.L.; DeMeo, M.; Zeller, J.M.; Fogg, L.; Adamji, J. Safety and efficacy of glucomannan for weight loss in overweight and moderately obese adults. J. Obes. 2013, 2013, 610908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Chong, P.W.; Beah, Z.M.; Grube, B.; Riede, L. IQP-GC-101 reduces body weight and body fat mass: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Phytother. Res. 2014, 28, 1520–1526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Taghizadeh, M.; Farzin, N.; Taheri, S.; Mahlouji, M.; Akbari, H.; Karamali, F.; Asemi, Z. The Effect of Dietary Supplements Containing Green Tea, Capsaicin and Ginger Extracts on Weight Loss and Metabolic Profiles in Overweight Women: A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial. Ann. Nutr. Metab. 2017, 70, 277–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Jensen, G.S.; Beaman, J.L.; He, Y.; Guo, Z.; Sun, H. Reduction of body fat and improved lipid profile associated with daily consumption of a Puer tea extract in a hyperlipidemic population: A randomized placebo-controlled trial. Clin. Interv. Aging 2016, 11, 367–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Kim, S.Y.; Oh, M.R.; Kim, M.G.; Chae, H.J.; Chae, S.W. Anti-obesity effects of Yerba Mate (Ilex Paraguariensis): A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2015, 15, 338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Kim, B.S.; Song, M.Y.; Kim, H. The anti-obesity effect of Ephedra sinica through modulation of gut microbiota in obese Korean women. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2014, 152, 532–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Shin, J.S.; Han, H.S.; Lee, S.B.; Myung, D.B.; Lee, K.; Lee, S.H.; Kim, H.J.; Lee, K.T. Chemical Constituents from Leaves of Hydrangea serrata and Their Anti-photoaging Effects on UVB-Irradiated Human Fibroblasts. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2019, 42, 424–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Han, H.S.; Shin, J.S.; Myung, D.B.; Ahn, H.S.; Lee, S.H.; Kim, H.J.; Lee, K.T. Hydrangea serrata (Thunb.) Ser. Extract Attenuate UVB-Induced Photoaging through MAPK/AP-1 Inactivation in Human Skin Fibroblasts and Hairless Mice. Nutrients 2019, 11, 533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Myung, D.B.; Han, H.S.; Shin, J.S.; Park, J.Y.; Hwang, H.J.; Kim, H.J.; Ahn, H.S.; Lee, S.H.; Lee, K.T. Hydrangenol Isolated from the Leaves of Hydrangea serrata Attenuates Wrinkle Formation and Repairs Skin Moisture in UVB-Irradiated Hairless Mice. Nutrients 2019, 11, 2354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Nutrients 14 00208 g001 550
Figure 1. Process of study.
Figure 1. Process of study.
Nutrients 14 00208 g001
Nutrients 14 00208 g002 550
Figure 2. Flow diagram of the enrolled participants.
Figure 2. Flow diagram of the enrolled participants.
Nutrients 14 00208 g002
Nutrients 14 00208 g003 550
Figure 3. Changes in body fat masses and fat percentages. Changes in (A,B) fat mass and (C,D) fat percentage were measured in placebo- and WHS-treated groups at baseline and 12 weeks. Values are present as mean ± SD; # p < 0.05 derived from paired t-test within groups (Weeks 0 vs. 12), and * p < 0.05 derived from a two-sample t-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test between groups (Placebo (n = 45) vs. WHS (n = 48)).
Figure 3. Changes in body fat masses and fat percentages. Changes in (A,B) fat mass and (C,D) fat percentage were measured in placebo- and WHS-treated groups at baseline and 12 weeks. Values are present as mean ± SD; # p < 0.05 derived from paired t-test within groups (Weeks 0 vs. 12), and * p < 0.05 derived from a two-sample t-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test between groups (Placebo (n = 45) vs. WHS (n = 48)).
Nutrients 14 00208 g003
Nutrients 14 00208 g004 550
Figure 4. Changes in body weights and BMIs. Changes in (A,B) weight and (C,D) BMI were measured in placebo- and WHS-treated groups at baseline, 6, and 12 weeks. Values are present as mean ± SD; # p < 0.05 derived from paired t-test within groups (Weeks 0 vs. 12), and * p < 0.05 derived from a two-sample t-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test between groups (Placebo (n = 45) vs. WHS (n = 48)).
Figure 4. Changes in body weights and BMIs. Changes in (A,B) weight and (C,D) BMI were measured in placebo- and WHS-treated groups at baseline, 6, and 12 weeks. Values are present as mean ± SD; # p < 0.05 derived from paired t-test within groups (Weeks 0 vs. 12), and * p < 0.05 derived from a two-sample t-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test between groups (Placebo (n = 45) vs. WHS (n = 48)).
Nutrients 14 00208 g004
Nutrients 14 00208 g005 550
Figure 5. Changes in waist and hip circumferences. Changes in (A,B) waist circumference and (C,D) hip circumference were measured in placebo- and WHS-treated groups at baseline, 6, and 12 weeks. Values are present as mean ± SD; # p < 0.05 derived from paired t-test within groups (Weeks 0 vs. 6 or 12), and * p < 0.05 derived from a two-sample t-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test between groups (Placebo (n = 45) vs. WHS (n = 48)).
Figure 5. Changes in waist and hip circumferences. Changes in (A,B) waist circumference and (C,D) hip circumference were measured in placebo- and WHS-treated groups at baseline, 6, and 12 weeks. Values are present as mean ± SD; # p < 0.05 derived from paired t-test within groups (Weeks 0 vs. 6 or 12), and * p < 0.05 derived from a two-sample t-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test between groups (Placebo (n = 45) vs. WHS (n = 48)).
Nutrients 14 00208 g005
Nutrients 14 00208 g006 550
Figure 6. Changes in body fat areas. (A) Visceral fat area, (B) subcutaneous fat area, (C) total abdominal fat area, and (D) visceral-to-subcutaneous fat ratio were measured in placebo- and WHS-treated groups at baseline and 12 weeks. (E–H) Changes in these parameters between Weeks 0 and 12. Values are present as mean ± SD; # p < 0.05 derived from paired t-test within groups (Weeks 0 vs. 12), and * p < 0.05 derived from a two-sample t-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test between groups (Placebo (n = 45) vs. WHS (n = 48)).
Figure 6. Changes in body fat areas. (A) Visceral fat area, (B) subcutaneous fat area, (C) total abdominal fat area, and (D) visceral-to-subcutaneous fat ratio were measured in placebo- and WHS-treated groups at baseline and 12 weeks. (E–H) Changes in these parameters between Weeks 0 and 12. Values are present as mean ± SD; # p < 0.05 derived from paired t-test within groups (Weeks 0 vs. 12), and * p < 0.05 derived from a two-sample t-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test between groups (Placebo (n = 45) vs. WHS (n = 48)).
Nutrients 14 00208 g006
Table
Table 1. Baseline demographic characteristics of the subjects.
Table 1. Baseline demographic characteristics of the subjects.
VariablePlacebo (n = 45)WHS (n = 48)p-Value
Sex (M/F)26/1920/280.1204 1
Age30.47 ± 9.6232.71 ± 10.980.3189 2
Drinker (Y/N)25/2026/220.9363 3
Smoker (Y/N)35/1033/150.6810 3
Values are present as mean ± SD; p-values are analyzed by 1 Chi-square test, 2 Wilcoxon rank-sum test, or 3 Fisher’s exact test. M/F; Male/Female, Y/N; Yes/No.
Table
Table 2. Lipid profiles of subjects.
Table 2. Lipid profiles of subjects.
VariablePeriodPlacebo (n = 45)WHS (n = 48)p-Value
Total cholesterol (mg/dL)Week 0196.80 ± 34.35196.44 ± 34.70
Week 12192.31 ± 26.88198.00 ± 28.72
Δ (0–12)−4.49 ± 21.121.56 ± 23.120.1917 1
HDL-cholesterol (mg/dL)Week 055.69 ± 12.6158.52 ± 12.22
Week 1253.84 ± 10.4156.73 ± 11.78
Δ (0–12)−1.84 ± 7.56−1.79 ± 10.200.8716 2
LDL-cholesterol (mg/dL)Week 0128.67 ± 29.42129.04 ± 31.48
Week 12118.80 ± 23.19 #123.54 ± 25.39
Δ (0–12)−9.87 ± 21.14−5.50 ± 25.750.3755 1
Triglyceride (mg/dL)Week 0138.73 ± 112.89115.19 ± 71.28
Week 12124.24 ± 112.7790.10 ± 52.55 #
Δ (0–12)−14.49 ± 95.13−25.08 ± 63.710.3934 2
Values are present as mean ± SD; p-values were analyzed by a 1 two-sample t-test or 2 Wilcoxon rank-sum test between groups (Placebo vs. WHS). # p < 0.05, derived from paired t-test within groups (Weeks 0 vs. 12).
Table
Table 3. Plasma levels of adipokines in subjects.
Table 3. Plasma levels of adipokines in subjects.
VariablePeriodPlacebo (n = 45)WHS (n = 48)p-Value 1
Adiponectin (μg/mL)Week 05.43 ± 1.946.18 ± 2.85
Week 124.88 ± 1.72 #6.00 ± 2.46
Δ (0–12)−0.55 ± 0.98−0.18 ± 1.920.1232
Leptin (ng/mL)Week 010.20 ± 8.8411.30 ± 7.63
Week 1210.19 ± 8.7710.09 ± 8.07
Δ (0–12)−0.01 ± 4.96−1.21 ± 5.730.4675
Values are present as mean ± SD; 1 p-values were analyzed by Wilcoxon rank-sum test between groups (Placebo vs. WHS). # p < 0.05 derived from a paired t-test within groups (Weeks 0 vs. 12).
Table
Table 4. Safety analyses.
Table 4. Safety analyses.
VariablePeriodPlacebo (n = 45)WHS (n = 48)p-Value
AST (U/L)Week 023.85 ± 9.7424.25 ± 8.52
Week 1224.44 ± 9.4929.62 ± 24.50
Δ (0–12)0.17 ± 7.325.04 ± 25.050.8791 2
ALT (U/L)Week 025.43 ± 16.7926.60 ± 15.72
Week 1224.33 ± 18.4134.54 ± 64.83
Δ (0–12)−0.52 ± 9.348.10 ± 63.320.7455 2
γ-GTP (U/L)Week 028.78 ± 18.6627.13 ± 18.27
Week 1229.42 ± 26.2824.63 ± 19.21
Δ (0–12)0.77 ± 13.26−2.17 ± 7.950.1433 2
Creatinine (mg/dL)Week 00.73 ± 0.160.70 ± 0.15
Week 120.77 ± 0.190.73 ± 0.16
Δ (0–12)0.03 ± 0.090.03 ± 0.060.9558 1
BUN (mg/dL)Week 012.57 ± 3.5112.38 ± 2.79
Week 1212.57 ± 3.8912.52 ± 3.57
Δ (0–12)0.03 ± 3.070.18 ± 3.540.8495 2
hs-CRP (mg/L)Week 02.48 ± 6.211.09 ± 1.09
Week 121.59 ± 2.881.22 ± 1.49
Δ (0–12)−0.90 ± 4.560.14 ± 0.860.7986 2
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)Week 0130.22 ± 12.53128.00 ± 11.42
Week 12124.83 ± 13.14123.46 ± 12.45
Δ (0–12)−6.60 ± 14.01−4.98 ± 12.550.4538 2
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)Week 078.88 ± 10.4878.12 ± 9.98
Week 1275.50 ± 11.1275.25 ± 9.52
Δ (0–12)−4.71 ± 11.35−2.73 ± 8.610.3266 1
Pulse (beats/min)Week 083.03 ± 11.8584.15 ± 11.62
Week 1280.81 ± 13.3681.02 ± 11.78
Δ (0–12)−3.48 ± 12.71−3.04 ± 12.140.8596 1
Values are present as mean ± SD; p-values were analyzed by a 1 two-sample t-test, or 2 Wilcoxon rank-sum test between groups.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Han, H.-S.; Chung, K.-S.; Shin, Y.-K.; Yu, J.-S.; Kang, S.-H.; Lee, S.-H.; Lee, K.-T. Effect of Standardized Hydrangea serrata (Thunb.) Ser. Leaves Extract on Body Weight and Body Fat Reduction in Overweight or Obese Humans: A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study. Nutrients 2022, 14, 208. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14010208

AMA Style

Han H-S, Chung K-S, Shin Y-K, Yu J-S, Kang S-H, Lee S-H, Lee K-T. Effect of Standardized Hydrangea serrata (Thunb.) Ser. Leaves Extract on Body Weight and Body Fat Reduction in Overweight or Obese Humans: A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study. Nutrients. 2022; 14(1):208. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14010208

Chicago/Turabian Style

Han, Hee-Soo, Kyung-Sook Chung, Yu-Kyong Shin, Jae-Sik Yu, Seung-Hyun Kang, Sun-Hee Lee, and Kyung-Tae Lee. 2022. "Effect of Standardized Hydrangea serrata (Thunb.) Ser. Leaves Extract on Body Weight and Body Fat Reduction in Overweight or Obese Humans: A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study" Nutrients 14, no. 1: 208. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14010208

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop