Next Article in Journal
Evidence for Autoimmunity in the Pathogenesis of COVID-19-Induced Myocarditis
Previous Article in Journal
Bioprocessed Black Rice Bran and Balloon Flower Root Cooperatively Regulate IgE, Epithelial Signaling, and Th1/Th2 Balance to Induce Therapeutic Response in a Mouse Model of Atopic Dermatitis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Significance of CXCL1 in Cancer: An Overview of Molecular Mechanisms

by
Jan Korbecki
1,*,
Mateusz Bosiacki
2,
Edyta Dzięciołowska-Baran
3,
Patrycja Pawlik
4,
Michał Lubkowski
5,
Ireneusz Walaszek
6 and
Katarzyna Barczak
4
1
Institute of Health Sciences, Collegium Medicum, University of Zielona Góra, Zyty 28 St., 65-046 Zielona Góra, Poland
2
Department of Biochemistry and Medical Chemistry, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Powstańców Wlkp. 72 St., 70-111 Szczecin, Poland
3
Department of Anatomy, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Powstańców Wlkp. 72 St., 70-111 Szczecin, Poland
4
Department of Endodontic Surgery, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Powstańców Wlkp. 72 St., 70-111 Szczecin, Poland
5
Department of Medical Biology, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Powstańców Wlkp. 72 St., 70-111 Szczecin, Poland
6
Department of Nursing, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Żołnierska 48 St., 71-210 Szczecin, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27(6), 2693; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27062693
Submission received: 14 February 2026 / Revised: 10 March 2026 / Accepted: 12 March 2026 / Published: 16 March 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Oncology)

Abstract

Chemokine CXCL1, also known as Gro-α and MGSA, a ligand of CXCR2, is the best-known CXC chemokine in cancer processes, after CXCL8/IL-8 and CXCL12/SDF-1. This paper is the first review on the role of CXCL1 in general molecular processes associated with cancer. It provides a comprehensive overview that allows for an in-depth understanding of the importance of CXCL1 in tumor-related processes. In this review, however, we did not address the clinical aspects of CXCL1, as these were discussed in our previous review articles. The present paper focuses on the involvement of CXCL1 in cancer processes such as proliferation, cancer stem cell (CSC) function, senescence, angiogenesis, lymphangiogenesis, migration and metastasis, and effects on tumor-associated cells such as neutrophils, tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), and cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs). It also describes the significance of CXCL1 in cancer-associated diseases such as cancer cachexia, cancer-associated immunodeficiency, neuroinflammatory-mediated affective-like behaviors, bone cancer pain, and acute kidney injury. We also present the effects of obesity on CXCL1-related cancer processes.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Chemokines are cytokines that cause chemotaxis of immune cells [1]. Forty-six different chemokines identified in humans are divided into sub-families depending on the cysteine motif at their N-terminus: α-chemokines with a CXC motif; β-chemokines with a CC motif; γ-chemokines with an XC motif; and δ-chemokines with a CX3C motif. CXC chemokines are numbered from 1 to 17 [1,2]. In humans, there is also a non-allelic CXC motif chemokine ligand 4 variant-1 (CXCL4L1) for the CXC motif chemokine ligand (CXCL)4 chemokine [3]. While CXCL15/lungkine can be found in rodents, in humans, it only occurs as a pseudogene in the 4q12-q13 CXC chemokine gene cluster alongside the genes of CXC motif chemokine receptor (CXCR)2 ligands and chemokine platelet-derived factor 4 (PF4)/CXCL4 [4]. The CXC chemokine sub-family can be further divided according to the receptor that is activated. The chemokines CXCL1-8 (except PF4/CXCL4) activate CXCR2 [1,2]. PF4/CXCL4 and CXCL9-11 activate CXCR3. CXCL12, CXCL13, CXCL16, and CXCL17 activate CXCR4, CXCR5, CXCR6, and G-protein-coupled receptor 35 (GPR35)/CXCR8, respectively. In humans, there are seven CXCR2 ligands [1,4], with CXCL6 and CXCL8 also activating CXCR1 at the same concentration as CXCR2 [5,6,7]. Other CXCR2 ligands also activate CXCR1 but not until concentrations are about 100 times higher [5,6,7]. In this way, the biological properties of these chemokines are associated with the activation of CXCR2. Isolated studies show that CXCL1 action depends on CXCR1 and CXCR2 [8]. The third receptor for CXCL1 is atypical chemokine receptor 1 (ACKR1)/Duffy antigen receptor for chemokines (DARC) [1,9]. This receptor can only regulate CXCL1 levels [10]. However, ACKR1/DARC can inhibit CXCR2 activity [11]. If it is located on the same cancer cell as CXCR2, then ACKR1/DARC has an anti-tumor effect. This paper is the first to summarize the body of research on the role of CXCL1 in the development of many cancers.

2. Research Method

This review is based on experimental articles on CXCL1 in cancer indexed in the PubMed search engine (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, accessed on 9 October 2025). Articles were filtered by the phrase: (MGSA or CXCL1 or GROA or GRO-A or GRO-1 or GRO1) cancer, not review. The main phrase “MGSA or CXCL1 or GROA or GRO-A or GRO-1 or GRO1” contains the historical and current names of the CXCL1 chemokine with Greek letters converted to Latin. It was used to find all available articles that had the name of the chemokine in the title, abstract, and keywords. The word “cancer” narrowed the search to articles on the role of CXCL1 in cancer. The phrase “not review” excluded review papers from the search. Out of the initial search result of 1200 articles, about 600 articles were pre-selected for reading based on the title. We also used their references to find any additional articles that could be relevant to this review.
One problem in writing this review was the lack of an animal model of CXCL1 action [4,11]. In humans, there are seven CXCR2 ligands, while in mice, there are five. The common ancestor of humans and mice had few CXCR2 ligand genes. The current genes in humans and mice appeared independently through duplication and speciation, and in each species, each CXCR2 ligand acquired its own characteristic properties. In addition, because a variety of processes are associated with the simultaneous expression of many different CXCR2 ligands, it is impossible to find the exact equivalents of individual human CXCR2 ligands in mice. For this reason, when discussing the articles demonstrating the importance of murine “CXCL1” in a given process, we preferred to be more general and write that a given cancer process only increases the expression of CXCR2 ligands in a mouse model. For this reason, studies conducted in mouse models serve mainly to confirm findings obtained in vitro using human cancer cell lines and analyses of human tumor tissues. Nevertheless, in this review, we attempt to avoid citing experimental studies performed in mouse models whenever possible.

3. Regulation of CXCL1 Expression in Cancer Cells

CXCL1 is produced by cancer cells, as demonstrated by analyses of models such as bladder cancer [12], cervical cancer [13], colorectal cancer—particularly with mutations in the KRAS gene [14]—gastric cancer [15,16], melanoma [17,18], prostate cancer [19], and many others.
Increased expression of CXCL1 in a cancer cell may be the result of the genetic changes that underlie the development of tumors. Frequent gene amplification leads to an increase in the expression of these genes, although the frequency of this amplification of the CXCL1 gene is low and depends on the type of cancer. It occurs in about 2.5% of ovarian cancer cases [20,21], 2% of breast cancer cases [22], and 1% of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cases [21]. Deletions or missense mutations in the CXCL1 gene also occur, but they are fewer than amplifications and involve only isolated cases [23,24,25]. The frequency of CXCL1 amplification increases with tumor growth. For this reason, a higher frequency of CXCL1 gene amplification is observed in metastasis, as shown by studies on breast cancer [26]. Genetic changes associated with CXCL1 may also contribute to cancer predisposition. An example of this is the duplicated region on chromosome 4q13 [27]. This is the region with the locus of the CXCL1 gene and the genes of other CXCR2 ligands.
An increase in CXCL1 expression in a tumor can result from genetic changes in other genes. An example of this is mutations in TP53 causing an increase in CXCL1 expression. TP53 is a tumor suppressor gene. If the product of this gene, p53, is activated, it inhibits proliferation and causes apoptosis upon stress induced by damage in the cell as well as by DNA damage and accumulation of mutations [28]. On the other hand, mutations in this gene are common in cancer [29]. The reason for this is selection pressure over cells with a reduced capacity for apoptosis [30]. TP53 mutations can be divided into loss-of-function and gain-of-function mutations. A loss-of-function TP53 mutation, such as in the DNA-binding domain, leads to increased CXCL1 expression [31]. Nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) and p53 mutually inhibit each other’s activity [32]—for this reason, a loss-of-function TP53 mutation leads to increased NF-κB activity and expression of genes dependent on this transcription factor, including CXCL1. Also, a gain-of-function mutation of TP53, for example, in the Zn2+-binding domain, results in an increase in CXCL1 expression [31,33]. This is associated with an increase in H-Ras activity [31]. p53 with this mutation attaches to the promoter of the CXCL1 gene [33], resulting in a direct increase in the expression of CXCL1 in a cancer cell with this TP53 mutation. Also, DNA-contact p53 gain-of-function mutants attach to the CXCL1 promoter, thus increasing the expression of this gene [31,34].
Another protein belonging to the p53 transcription factor family is p63 [35]. Members of this family increase the expression of similar genes but can also differ in their effects on the expression of certain genes. p63 attaches to the CXCL1 promoter to increase the expression of this gene [36]. This process is significant in the development of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
CXCL1 expression in a cancer cell is dependent on high basal NF-κB activation [18,37,38]. Various factors are responsible for this feature of the tumor cell, including the elevated expression of NF-κB-inducing kinase (NIK) [39], mutation in the TP53 gene and non-functionality of p53 [40], and elevation in tumor levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) [41] and interleukin (IL)-1α and IL-1β [42,43]. NF-κB attaches to the promoter of the CXCL1 gene, which increases the expression of this chemokine. At the same time, once secreted outside the tumor cell, CXCL1 activates its receptor CXCR2 in an autocrine manner. Subsequently, CXCL1 increases the activation of NF-κB. Activation of this transcription factor, which depends on p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) but not extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) MAPK activation [44], leads to an increase in CXCL1 production in the tumor cell by CXCL1 itself. This process has been demonstrated in cervical cancer [13], malignant melanoma [17,44,45], and prostate cancer [19].
Other transcription factors can increase CXCL1 expression in a tumor cell. An example of this is Snail [46], a transcription factor responsible for epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) [47]. Snail increases CXCL1 expression by directly attaching to the CXCL1 promoter and by increasing NF-κB activation [46]. For this reason, migrating tumor cells express CXCL1, which is important in tumor growth, invasion and metastasis. Another protein that attaches to the CXCL1 promoter is hes-related family bHLH transcription factor with YRPW motif like (HEYL) [48], activated by Notch signaling, a signaling pathway frequently activated in tumors [49]. This mechanism of increased CXCL1 expression is important in the induction of angiogenesis via Notch signaling.
CXCL1 expression can also be regulated by histone modification. Specifically, CXCL1 expression can be reduced by histone H3 lysine 36 methyltransferase SET-domain-containing 2 (SETD2) [50]. SETD2 induces histone methylation at positions ranging from 2.0 to 1.5 k base pairs prior to the onset of transcription at the start of the CXCL1 gene, leading to the decreased expression of this chemokine. Importantly, mutations in the SETD2 gene and decreased SETD2 expression are common in various cancers [50,51,52] and lead to increased CXCL1 expression.
High expression of CXCL1 in a cancer cell may also be due to the increased activity of RAS proteins, particularly K-RAS. In tumors, mutations in RAS genes often occur, causing an increase in the activity of these proteins. An increase in CXCL1 expression caused by mutation in RAS protein genes was confirmed by experiments on colorectal cancer cells [53] and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma [54,55]. This process is important in the emergence of autocrine cell growth and the development of many cancers.
CXCL1 expression in the tumor may depend on factors present in the tumor microenvironment. It may depend on chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in liver cancer [56,57,58,59], Helicobacter pylori infection in gastric cancer [60,61], Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV)/human herpes virus-8 (HHV8) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection in Kaposi’s sarcoma [62]. Also, CXCL1 expression in the tumor cell is increased by prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) as well as other prostanoids [63,64,65]. At the same time, in colorectal cancer, this may be the most important factor responsible for the elevated CXCL1 expression in the tumor [65]. CXCL1 expression is also increased by secretory factors such as CXCL12/stromal-derived factor-1 (SDF-1) [66], IL-1α and IL-1β [42,43], epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) ligands [67], and IL-17 [68].
Not all factors increase CXCL1 expression–some decrease it. An example of this is the transforming growth factor β (TGF-β), which decreases CXCL1 expression [69]. Therefore, the disruption of TGF-β increases the expression of CXCL1. The disruption of SMAD family member 4 (SMAD4) [70] or the loss of TGF-β type II receptor (TβRII) expression in cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) is common in tumors [71]. This leads to increased CXCL1 expression.
CXCL1 expression is regulated by microRNA. At the same time, the expression of microRNA in cancer is often downregulated relative to healthy tissue. This leads to an increase in CXCL1 expression. Examples include miR-1-3p in rectal adenocarcinoma [72], miR-27b-5p in ovarian cancer [73], miR-141 in non-small-cell lung cancer [74], miR-145-5p in colorectal cancer [75], miR-200a in hepatocellular carcinoma [76,77], and miR-302e in colorectal cancer [78].
CXCL1 expression may also depend on changes in the tumor microenvironment, such as hypoxia, i.e., a reduction in oxygen levels in certain regions of the tumor. In tumors, there are regions characterized by chronic hypoxia and cycling hypoxia [79,80]; the latter exhibits hypoxia, and the reoxygenation of such areas occurs from time to time. Hypoxia affects CXCL1 expression, but this is dependent on the model studied. In a model of hepatocellular carcinoma cells [81], cervical cancer cells [82], and prostate cancer cells [83], chronic hypoxia increases CXCL1 expression. Conversely, in SK-OV-3 ovarian adenocarcinoma and WM793B melanoma cells, chronic hypoxia reduces CXCL1 expression [83]. In contrast, in lung adenocarcinoma cells, chronic hypoxia does not affect CXCL1 expression [84]. Cycling hypoxia, depending on the model, affects CXCL1 expression in various ways. It can increase expression in PC-3 prostate cancer cells and SK-OV-3 ovarian adenocarcinoma cells and also decrease the expression of CXCL1 in WM793B melanoma cells [83]. Another parameter of the tumor microenvironment is reduced pH or acidosis [85], which increases CXCL1 expression, as shown by experiments on bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) [86]. CXCL1 expression in a tumor may depend on tumorigenic changes in extracellular matrix (ECM). Unfolding of the type III domains of fibronectin is caused by myofibroblasts [87]. Such an altered ECM protein causes an increase in the expression of CXCR2 ligands, including CXCL1 and TNF-α, in fibroblasts. This process has been noted in lung squamous cell carcinoma tumors [87].
The action of CXCL1 can be dependent on CXCR2 and on its other receptors, for example, ACKR1/DARC [9], an atypical receptor for CXCL1 and other chemokines. This receptor binds this chemokine without clear intracellular signal transduction. Therefore, ACKR1/DARC regulates the availability of CXCL1 to the CXCR2 receptor by removing this chemokine from the extracellular space [9]. Also, if the expression of ACKR1/DARC occurs on the same cell as CXCR2, then it can interfere with CXCR2 function [11,88].
Cell death is associated with the formation of residues that should be removed by phagocytic cells. For this reason, during cell death, there is an increase in the secretion of chemotactic factors for neutrophils and monocytes. This is the so-called “find-me” signal. One of them is CXCL1. The expression of this chemokine is increased during FasL-induced apoptosis [89], which is associated with NF-κB activation by the Fas-associated via receptor interacting serine/threonine kinase 1 (RIPK1) complex.
An increase in CXCL1 expression also occurs during necroptosis [90,91], a process that has features of apoptosis and necrosis. It is a process of programmed cell death that includes the violation of cell membrane integrity. Increased expression of RIPK1 and RIPK3, the components of necroptosis, occurs during chemotherapy, for example, when using gemcitabine against pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cells [90]. This increases CXCL1 expression in the tumor after chemotherapy, which is important in resistance to chemotherapy. This process is common in many types of cancer treated with many types of anticancer drugs. For example, CXCL1 expression was found to be increased in tumor cells treated with chemotherapeutics such as paclitaxel [92,93], oxaliplatin [94,95], and epidoxorubicin [96]. Long-term reduction in RIPK3 expression can increase CXCL1 expression through increased NF-κB activation, as noted in hepatocellular carcinoma cells [97].

4. Molecular Mechanism of CXCL1 Function in Cancer Processes

4.1. Proliferation and Pro-Survival Properties

CXCL1 increases tumor cell proliferation in many types of cancer, including bladder cancer [98], cervical cancer [13], colorectal cancer [99], gastric cancer [100,101], glioblastoma [102], and ovarian cancer [103]. However, this property depends on the type of cancer—for example, CXCL1 weakly increases prostate cancer cell proliferation [8], while in cholangiocarcinoma, CXCL1 inhibits tumor cell proliferation [104].
Increased proliferation by CXCL1 is associated with the activation of CXCR2, which causes the transactivation of EGFR (Figure 1) [105,106]. Activation of CXCR2 causes signal transduction and activation of an unspecified matrix metalloproteinase (MMP), as indicated by the used pan-MMP inhibitor GM6001 [105]. Activated MMP causes the proteolytic cleavage of heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor (HB-EGF), a ligand of EGFR. HB-EGF then activates its receptor EGFR.
The increase in tumor cell proliferation by CXCL1 occurs because of CXCR2 activation, which leads to decreased expression of p21, a cell cycle inhibitor at the G1/S checkpoint [107]. CXCR2 also causes an increase in the expression of cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinases, including cyclin A, cyclin B1, cyclin D1, cyclin E, cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)2, and CDK6 [107]. Importantly, the effect on proliferation depends on the status of p53 in the cancer cell [108]. CXCR2 activation increases the proliferation of cells with p53wt much more than that of cells with either p53 mutation or non-functional p53. This is related to the activation of the Akt//PKB-Mdm2 pathway. Mdm2 inhibits p53 activity, which leads to reduced expression of p21, a cell cycle inhibitor [108].
CXCR2 activation has an anti-apoptotic effect [107,109]. It is associated with an increase in the expression of anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 family proteins, i.e., Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL, a decrease in the expression of pro-apoptotic Bcl-2 family proteins, and the inhibition of p53 activity.
The action of CXCL1 is partly autocrine [13]. The cancer cell has high basal activation of NF-κB [37,38], resulting in high expression of genes dependent on this transcription factor, such as CXCL1. Subsequently, through its receptor, CXCL1 increases NF-κB activation and thus its own expression [44].
The action of CXCL1 may also depend on the interaction of various cells in the tumor niche. A significant source of CXCL1 in some cancers is CAF [110]. The tumor cell secretes factors that turn fibroblasts into CAFs; CAFs then secrete CXCL1, which increases tumor cell proliferation.
Another aspect of CXCL1’s influence on cancer cells is its effect on metabolism. A study on colorectal cancer has shown that CXCL1 increases the intensity of glycolysis by increasing the expression of glucose transporter type 1 (GLUT1), hexokinase 2 (HK2), and lactate dehydrogenase A (LDHA) [111]. As a consequence, cancer cells secrete lactate, which shapes the tumor microenvironment and influences multiple cancer-related processes.

4.2. Senescence

In an unfavorable environment that causes damage to DNA, and due to the accumulation of genetic changes over the years [112], a cell can be transformed into a non-dividing senescent cell to prevent uncontrolled proliferation from the mutation of genes encoding RAS proteins [113,114].
Cellular senescence involves p53-dependent inhibition of cell division [115]. In addition, the cell shows changes in the secretion of a variety of factors, the so-called senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) [115,116], causing the migration of immune cells that remove the pre-malignant senescent cells [117]. The SASP induction is dependent on NF-κB [113,118], which causes an increase in the expression of CXCL1 and CXCL8/IL-8 [113,116]. At the same time, activated p53 binds to the CXCR2 promoter that elevates the expression of this receptor in senescent cells and results in enhancements of the action of ligands of this receptor, such as CXCL1 and CXCL8/IL-8 [114]. These two chemokines cause an increase in the expression of CXCL1 and CXCL8/IL-8, as well as sustaining the senescence of the cell [113,116]. At the early stages of tumorigenesis, CXCL1 inhibits tumor formation by enhancing senescence [113,119]. This means that there are two main factors in a senescent cell: p53, which inhibits cell division, and the CXCL1/CXCL8-CXCR2 axis, which is responsible for maintaining senescence as well as stimulating cell division and anchorage-independent growth when there is no active p53 [116]. If there is a mutation in the TP53 gene, then the CXCL1/CXCL8-CXCR2 axis causes the proliferation of the cell, which may lead to tumor formation (Figure 2).
In tumors, senescence is involved in tumorigenesis. CXCL1 from a tumor cell induces the senescence of stromal fibroblasts [120] through the activation of p53 and p16 [120,121]. This mechanism has been observed in many cancers, such as colon cancer [120] and ovarian cancer [121], and leads to an increase in the expression and secretion of CXCL1 as well as other factors from the senescent fibroblast [121]. In other words, the cell exhibits SASP.
Under physiological conditions, senescence causes the activation of the immune system and the destruction of senescent cells [117]. However, in the tumor microenvironment, processes known as tumor immune evasion [122] inhibit the activation of the immune system. For this reason, SASP does not have an anti-tumor effect and promotes tumor growth, as it contains factors that increase proliferation and tumor cell migration as well as cause angiogenesis [115,116].

4.3. Cancer Stem Cells and Stemness

Cancer cells in a tumor are not a homogeneous population. There is a small population of cancer cells in the tumor called cancer stem cells, which are slow-cycling cells that show increased expression of DNA repair enzymes and transporters that remove xenobiotics, such as anticancer drugs outside their cell [123,124]. For this reason, these cells show resistance to chemotherapeutics and radiation therapy. After anticancer treatment, cancer stem cells reconstitute the cancer tumor; CXCL1 plays an important role in the physiology of these cells.
CXCL1 causes proliferation and self-renewal of cancer stem cells, as has been found in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) [125], breast cancer [126,127], and glioblastoma [128]. CXCL1 also increases the stemness of cancer stem cells. Particularly, this chemokine increases the expression of CD133 in these cells, as shown in colorectal cancer [129]. Studies in mouse models have also shown that CXCR2 ligands induce quiescence and inhibit differentiation of premalignant hepatic cells [124]—an effect that is associated with the mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) activation.
In cancer tumors, cancer stem cells may exhibit higher CXCL1 expression than cancer non-stem cells, as confirmed by a study on thyroid cancer [130]. CXCL1 expression in cancer stem cells is increased by various factors including neurotensin (NT) in hepatocellular carcinoma cancer stem cells [131] or insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) in lung cancer stem cells [132]. In the case of NT, increased CXCL1 expression is due to the activation of the RAF-1-ERK MAPK pathway [131]; this factor also increases CXCL8/IL-8 expression.
Cancer stem cells express CXCL1 [127] and CXCR2 [127]. Due to this, CXCL1 acts on these cells in an autocrine manner, increasing their numbers. This tumorigenic mechanism is significant in the development of breast cancer [127]. Importantly, the described effects of CXCL1 may depend on the type of cancer. For example, in thyroid cancer stem cells, CXCL8/IL-8 is a more important chemokine than CXCL1, due to the higher expression of CXCR1 than CXCR2 on cancer stem cells [130]. Similarly, in hepatocellular carcinoma cancer stem cells, the essential ligand of CXCR2 is not CXCL1 but CXCL8/IL-8 [131].

4.4. Angiogenesis and Lymphangiogenesis

In the early days of CXCL1 research, this chemokine was classified as a pro-angiogenic CXC chemokine with an ELR motif. Historically, the CXC chemokine sub-family was divided into ELR+ and ELR CXC chemokines [133]. ELR+ CXC chemokines had pro-angiogenic properties, in contrast to ELR CXC chemokines. In subsequent years, the ELR motif was shown to be important in the binding of ELR+ CXC chemokines to CXCR2 [134]. In other words, ELR+ CXC chemokines were ligands of CXCR2 [135] while ELR CXC chemokines were CXCR3 ligands [136]. The CXCR3 receptor is found in the S, G2, and M phases of the cell cycle in endothelial cells. Activation of this receptor blocks the proliferation of these cells, which means that CXCR3 ligands have anti-angiogenic properties. After the discovery of CXCL12, which lacks the ELR motif but has pro-angiogenic properties [137], the division of CXC chemokines into ELR+ and ELR became obsolete.
The pro-angiogenic properties of CXCL1 are associated with the activation of CXCR2 on endothelial cells, as shown by experiments on bovine adrenal gland capillary endothelial cells [133], human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) [138,139], and human dermal microvascular endothelial cells [138,139]. CXCL1 induces the migration, proliferation, and tube formation of endothelial cells. Also, in vivo experiments have confirmed the pro-angiogenic properties of CXCL1 [133,140]. CXCL1 induces angiogenesis in tumorigenesis because, in tumorigenesis, endothelial cells show CXCR2 expression (Figure 3) [141,142].
In tumor angiogenesis, CXCL1 interacts with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) and EGFR ligands, as all these factors increase each other’s expression and thus act cooperatively. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) via VEGFR2-phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase (PI3K)-PKB/Akt increases Bcl-2 expression in microvascular endothelial cells [143,144,145]. Also, VEGF can activate VEGFR1 on tumor cells, increasing Bcl-2 expression, as shown by experiments on head and neck squamous cell carcinomas [146]. Bcl-2 expression in cancer cells, such as in prostate cancer cells, may depend on CXCR2 [147].
As Bcl-2 is an anti-apoptotic protein [143], VEGF increases the viability of endothelial cells, which is an important mechanism for promoting angiogenesis. In addition, Bcl-2 can increase VEGF expression via signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT)3 in microvascular endothelial cells [145]. Bcl-2 causes an increase in the inhibitory activity of NF-κB kinase (IKK) and thus an increase in NF-κB activation [144], which leads to an increase in CXCL1 and CXCL8/IL-8 expression in microvascular endothelial cells [144,145,148] and in cancer cells [146]; this means that VEGF increases CXCL1 expression by increasing Bcl-2 expression. This cascade can be initiated by epidermal growth factor (EGF) [148], which increases the expression of Bcl-xL in endothelial cells, as shown by experiments on human dermal microvascular endothelial cells [148]. Subsequently, Bcl-xL increases the expression of VEGF, which increases the expression of Bcl-2 and then the expression of CXCL1 and CXCL8/IL-8.
VEGF can also increase the expression of EGFR ligands, which increases the expression of CXCL1. The interaction of VEGF, EGFR, and CXCL1 may be a part of intercellular communication in cancer. VEGF from tumor cells may increase the expression of EGFR ligands in endothelial cells via VEGFR2 [149], which is followed by the secretion of EGFR ligands by endothelial cells. Activation of EGFR on cancer cells results in the activation of NF-κB and increased expression of CXCL1 and CXCL8/IL-8, which leads to the recruitment of endothelial cells [149,150].
CXCL1 can also influence the expression of VEGF and the activation of EGFR. CXCL1 increases VEGF-A expression, as shown by experiments on HUVECs [139] and studies of melanoma tumors with CXCL1 silenced [151]. In gastric cancer cells, CXCR2 activation results in STAT3 activation, which increases VEGF expression [99]. CXCL1 can also cause transactivation of the EGFR. CXCR2 activation causes cathepsin B activation in microvascular endothelial cells [152], which leads to the release of HB-EGF, an EGFR ligand. Experiments on HUVECs and human dermal microvascular endothelial cells have shown that CXCL1 increases EGF expression [138]. EGFR ligands activate their receptor, thereby causing endothelial cells to migrate to areas with an elevated level of CXCL1. CXCL1 acts not only on endothelial cells but also on endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs). It causes the transmigration of these cells and thus the recruitment of EPCs into the forming blood vessels in the tumor [153,154,155]. Also, CXCL1 induces EPC proliferation, differentiation, and the formation of capillary-like structures. CXCL1, similarly to other CXCR2 ligands, can also induce angiogenesis by acting on CXCR2+ cancer stem cells [156]. This is particularly relevant in glioblastoma multiforme tumors, where these cells exhibit vascular mimicry.
CXCL1 can also indirectly cause angiogenesis. It causes the recruitment of neutrophils into the tumor niche, which are then transformed into tumor-associated neutrophils (TANs) [157]. While TANs secrete VEGF [158], the main pro-angiogenic mechanism of these cells is an increase in VEGF bioavailability, enabled by MMP9, secreted by TANs. In the tumor niche, TANs are a significant source of MMP9 [159,160,161]. This metalloproteinase does not cleave VEGF165 but causes the digestion of heparan sulfates, which leads to the release of this growth factor from the ECM [162]. However, MMP9 can also cause angiogenesis independently of VEGF [163], which is likely related to the digestion of ECM by MMP9 and the release of other pro-angiogenic factors [164]. TANs also secrete oncostatin M [165], which can induce the secretion of VEGF from tumor cells, as shown in breast cancer cells. Another factor with pro-angiogenic properties that is secreted by TANs is Bv8/prokineticin 2 [166].
CXCL1 also participates in lymphangiogenesis and lymph node metastasis. Factors secreted by cancer cells induce an increase in the expression and secretion of CXCL1 by lymphatic endothelial cells (LECs) [167,168,169]. The CXCL1 secreted by LECs and other cells in the tumor niche act on LECs, which is followed by tube formation of LECs and lymphangiogenesis [168]. In addition, LECs migrate to areas with high CXCL1 levels [168]. CXCL1 also causes tumor cells to migrate into lymphatic blood vessels, which leads to lymph node metastasis. This mechanism has been demonstrated in breast cancer [169], gastric cancer [168,170], and oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma [167]. Nevertheless, this effect may depend on the type of cancer; for example, in prostate cancer, CCL7 is a more significant chemokine in this process than CXCL1 [169].

4.5. Cancer Immune Evasion

In cancer tumors, a very significant tumor mechanism is cancer immune evasion. This process involves inhibition of the anti-tumor immune response by various mechanisms that occur in the tumor microenvironment [122]. One of these components is CXCL1. This chemokine induces the recruitment of MDSCs into the tumor niche, which are cells with immunosuppressive properties [43,65,171]. CXCL1 also decreases the expression of human leukocyte antigen-group DR (HLA-DR) and IL-12p70 in activated dendritic cells [172], which inhibits the function of these cells in the anti-tumor response. On the other hand, CXCL1 does not affect the expression of IL-1β, IL-10, and TNF-α in these cells [172]. CXCL1 also increases programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in tumor cells as shown by experiments on glioblastoma [101]. PD-L1 is a trans-membrane protein that causes anergy of anti-tumor lymphocytes and thus protects cancer cells against the immune system [122].

4.6. Effects on Tumor-Associated Cells

4.6.1. Adipocytes

Various cells, such as adipocytes, are recruited into the cancer tumor and transformed by the tumor microenvironment into cancer-associated adipocytes [173]. The significance of these cells is best understood in breast cancer, where cancer-associated adipocytes in the tumor niche secrete leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) and thereby increase CXCL1 expression in cancer cells [174]. LIF activates STAT3 in cancer cells, which leads to an increase in CXCL1 expression in these cells. In turn, CXCL1 increases LIF expression in cancer-associated adipocytes. This means that there is a feedback loop between breast cancer cells and cancer-associated adipocytes—a mechanism involving CXCL1.

4.6.2. Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts

Fibroblasts may be important in cancer formation. In old age, these cells secrete increased amounts of CXCR2 ligands, including CXCL1 [175]. This process has been noted in the prostate, which has been associated with benign prostatic hypertrophy, a condition preceding prostate cancer.
In the tumor niche, CAFs are the fibroblasts recruited and transformed by the tumor microenvironment. These cells can be distinguished into myofibroblastic CAFs and inflammatory CAFs [176,177]. Myofibroblastic CAFs are characterized by the high expression of α smooth muscle actin (αSMA) and produce ECM components. Inflammatory CAFs show high expression and secretion of pro-tumorigenic secreted factors including CXCR2 ligands (CXCL1, CXCL6/GCP-2, CXCL8/IL-8), CC motif chemokine ligand (CCL)5/regulated on activation, normally T cell expressed and secreted (RANTES), VEGF, granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), IL-6 and PGE2 produced by cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) [178,179]. This secretory phenotype is associated with NF-κB activation in inflammatory CAFs [179]. Exposure of CAFs to CXCR2 ligands, including CXCL1, leads to the enhancement of their secretory phenotype, i.e., their change into inflammatory CAFs [176].
CAFs in a tumor can arise from fibroblasts that are present in the parent tissue. CAFs can also be recruited from cells that are in other tissues and then transformed into CAFs. An example of this is white adipose tissue (WAT) adipose stromal cells (ASCs) [180]. Under the influence of CXCL1 as well as other CXCR2 ligands, ASCs are mobilized from WAT and then recruited to the tumor niche, as demonstrated in obese prostate cancer patients. ASCs are then transformed into myofibroblasts by CXCL1. CAFs can also arise from recruited bone marrow MSCs that differentiate into myofibroblasts [181].
In cancer tumors, in addition to cancer cells, CAFs also secrete CXCL1 into the tumor microenvironment. This has been demonstrated in cancers such as bladder cancer [182], colorectal cancer [14], malignant melanoma [183], and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma [184]. In prostate cancer, CXCL1 expression occurs in stromal myofibroblasts [185], and in colorectal cancer, the main source of CXCL1 is myofibroblasts [14]. In esophageal squamous cell carcinoma [186] and oral squamous cell carcinoma [187], CAFs are the most important sources of CXCL1. Importantly, CAFs must interact with cancer cells to produce large amounts of CXCL1, as shown by experiments on oral squamous cell carcinoma [187].
CXCL1 expression in CAFs is upregulated by cancer cells [188]. Cancer cells secrete extracellular vesicles—a type of intercellular communication in which various miRNA, mRNA, and proteins are transferred between cells. One of the elements carried by extracellular vesicles from the cancer cell are miRNA such as miR-155, miR-193b and miR-210 [189], which cause an increase in CXCL1 expression in fibroblasts in the tumor niche, such as in gastric cancer. Heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) and phosphorylated IKKα/β are also found in extracellular vesicles secreted from cancer cells under hypoxia [183]. The IKKα/β complex of HSP90 is introduced into CAFs, which activates NF-κB in these cells. This results in the increased expression of genes dependent on this transcription factor, including CXCL1 [183]. Extracellular vesicles secreted by cancer cells can also directly increase CXCL1 expression by transferring CXCL1 mRNA between cells [190].
Other factors also increase CXCL1 expression in CAFs. An example of this is IL-1α from a tumor cell, which increases CXCL1 expression, as well as enhancing the secretory phenotype and decreasing the myofibroblast phenotype of CAFs [36,191]. Another factor that increases CXCL1 expression in CAFs is tumor changes in ECM. Myofibroblasts cause the unfolding of the type III domains of fibronectin [87]. Subsequently, such modified fibronectin increases CXCL1 expression in CAFs, particularly in lung squamous cell carcinoma tumors [87]. Another ECM in tumors that increases CXCL1 expression in CAFs is laminin subunit gamma 1 (LAMC1) [192].
Also, the loss of responsiveness to TGF-β through the loss of TGF-β type II receptor (TβRII) expression may be responsible for the increase in CXCL1 expression in CAFs [71]. This process frequently occurs in many cancers, such as in prostate cancer [71]. TGF-β is a downregulator of CXCL1 expression. For this reason, cells that have lost responsiveness to this cytokine show increased expression of CXCL1 and CXCL16 [71]. This process is significant because the CXCL1 and CXCL16 secreted by CAFs increase the adhesion capacity of tumor cells to type I collagen, the main component of ECM in bones. Thus, this process facilitates the formation of bone metastasis.
CXCL1 produced by CAFs may contribute to resistance to anticancer treatment. The expression of this chemokine in CAFs is increased by radiotherapy, which is a mechanism of radioresistance, at least in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma [186].
In a tumor, CXCL1 acts on CAFs and causes a decrease in fibulin-1 expression [193]. This is induced by the activation of NF-κB, which forms a complex with histone deacetylase 1 (HDAC1) that reduces the acetylation of histones at the NF-κB-binding site in the fibulin-1 promoter [8]. This mechanism has been observed in prostate cancer cells, where CXCL1 decreased the expression of fibulin-1 [8], a protein that is involved in ECM function. This process is important in the development of many cancers, including colorectal cancer and prostate cancer. CXCL1 also induces the expression of connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) in CAFs [194]. This growth factor is important in the development of tumors, particularly in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Factors secreted from the tumor cells, including CXCL1, cause the senescence of stromal fibroblasts [120]. In this state, these cells exhibit a SASP [115,116], dependent on p53 in the fibroblast [120,121]. A cancer cell often has a dysfunction in the TP53 gene [29], causing it to avoid senescence. Senescent fibroblasts secrete various factors, including CXCL1, into the tumor microenvironment [120], although this process is not universal to all tumor types or all cases of a given cancer. Studies on various melanoma lines have shown that some lines increase CXCL1 expression in CAFs, while some have no effect on the expression of this chemokine [195].

4.6.3. Mast Cells

Other cells in the tumor niche, although very rarely studied, are mast cells. These cells secrete CXCL1 in cancerous tumors, as confirmed by studies on the models of thyroid cancer [196] and adrenocortical carcinomas [197]. At the same time, the cancer processes in which the CXCL1 produced by these cells participates have been poorly studied.

4.6.4. Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells

MDSCs are cells that reduce the immune system’s overly potent response [198]. In tumors, there is an accumulation of these cells, which has the effect of preventing the immune system from fighting the tumor. These cells can be divided into two main groups: granulocytic-myeloid-derived suppressor cells (G-MDSCs) and monocytic-myeloid-derived suppressor cells (M-MDSCs).
Granulocytic-Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells
CXCL1 induces the recruitment of G-MDSCs into the tumor niche, as these cells have CXCR2 expression [43,65,171,199]. At the same time, CXCL1 may be just one piece of a larger meshwork of associations between various factors in the tumor microenvironment.
A lot of cancers are pro-inflammatory in nature. For this reason, such cancers have increased levels of IL-1β, a cytokine that increases the expression of many factors that affect G-MDSC function [43]. Examples include granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and Bv8/prokineticin 2, which are responsible for the mobilization from the bone marrow of G-MDSCs, but not for the recruitment of these cells into the tumor niche [43]. Also, IL-1β causes an increase in the expression of CXCR2 ligands, including CXCL1, chemokines that are responsible for the recruitment of G-MDSCs into the tumor niche [43,65,171]. Importantly, CXCL1 has no direct effect on the expansion of G-MDSCs in the bone marrow [200]. G-MDSCs are responsible for cancer immune evasion. They secrete S100A8/A9, which reduces the anti-tumor properties of CD8+ T cells [171]. MDSCs also secrete chemokines, including CXCR2 ligands [201], the expression of which is increased under hypoxia. MDSCs are also significant in tumorigenic processes beyond the primary tumor. Cancerous tumors secrete TGF-β into the bloodstream [202]. This results in increased expression of CXCR2 ligands in the liver. Also, CXCL1 from the primary tumor in colorectal cancer particularly translocates to the liver. CXCL1 in the liver causes infiltration of this organ by MDSCs [77]. MDSCs in the liver shape the pre-metastatic niche. This facilitates the formation of metastasis in the liver by colorectal cancer [77].
MDSCs not only cause cancer immune evasion in cancer tumors but also cause systemic immune downregulation caused by the cancer. Following the recruitment of these cells to the liver, they reduce the immune function of this organ [77], which leads to an overall reduction in immunity.
Monocytic-Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells
CXCL1 does not directly recruit M-MDSCs to the tumor niche because these cells do not exhibit high CXCR2 expression [65,200]. At the same time, once M-MDSCs are recruited into the tumor niche, induction of CXCR2 expression occurs in them [43]. CXCL1 can indirectly affect the recruitment of M-MDSCs to the tumor niche. Cancer causes chronic elevation of CXCL1 levels in the blood, which results in the expansion of M-MDSCs in the bone marrow [200,203]. At the same time, CXCL1 has no direct effect on the expansion of G-MDSCs [200]—the increase in M-MDSCs in the bone marrow occurs because of CXCR2 activation on granulocyte and macrophage progenitor cells (GMPs) [203], which reduces Sin3A-associated protein 18 (SAP18) expression in these cells. SAP18 binds to regulatory sequences at the HRAS and PIK3CG genes, leading to the decreased expression of the H-RAS proto-oncogene and PI3Kγ. This means that CXCL1 increases the expression of H-RAS and PI3Kγ in GMPs, and thus results in the increased activity of the ERK MAPK-STAT3 pathway. This leads to the differentiation of GMPs into M-MDSCs. The increased number of M-MDSCs in the bone marrow leads to an increase in the number of these cells in the blood and then to an increase in the recruitment of M-MDSCs into the tumor niche by other factors [200,203].

4.6.5. Mesenchymal Stem Cells

CXCL1 induces the recruitment of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs) into the tumor niche [181]. At the same time, the importance of CXCL1 in this process is questioned, as BM-MSCs lack CXCR2 expression and therefore should not respond to CXCL1 [204]. In the tumor niche, BM-MSCs differentiate into myofibroblasts, including under the influence of extracellular vesicles from cancer cells [181,205]. In tumorigenesis, MSCs secrete many cytokines—a study on umbilical cord MSCs has shown that recruited MSCs secrete CXCL1, CXCL8/IL-8, CCL2/monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1) and IL-6 [128]. At the same time, the secretion of these pro-tumorigenic secreted factors is increased by acidosis, as confirmed by experiments on bone marrow-MSC [86]. Acidosis is an important element of the microenvironment of many cancers [85], which involves a decrease in pH under the influence of cancer cell metabolism. Other factors that increase the expression of CXCR2 ligands in the cells described are TNF-α [206] and IL-1β [207]. Another factor that increases CXCL1 expression in bone marrow MSC are extracellular vesicles from tumor cells [205]. Also, anticancer drugs, including carboplatin, increase CXCL1 expression in MSCs [208]. CXCL1 has a pro-tumor effect, and for this reason, an increase in CXCL1 expression in MSCs is a mechanism for increasing resistance to chemotherapy.

4.6.6. Natural Killer Cells

Natural killer (NK) cells are cytotoxic cells that destroy cancer cells [209]. The anti-tumor activity in the tumor microenvironment of NK cells can be downregulated or even completely blocked by many factors and mechanisms [122]. NK cells can then begin to cooperate with cancer cells and other tumor-associated cells and promote tumor growth. For example, lung cancer cells under hypoxia secrete extracellular vesicles containing miR-150 [210], which directly downregulates CD226 expression in NK cells and thus alters the phenotype of NK cells. Such NK cells express VEGF, MMP, CCL2/MCP-1, IL-6, and CXCR2 ligands including CXCL1 and CXCL8/IL-8 [210] and therefore are involved in tumorigenesis.

4.6.7. Tumor-Associated Dendritic Cells

CXCL1 is also secreted by tumor-associated dendritic cells (TADCs) into the tumor microenvironment [129]. These are dendritic cells recruited to the tumor niche, which, under the influence of the tumor microenvironment, have lost their anti-tumor properties and acquired the property of promoting tumor growth. Under the influence of factors from cancer cells, these cells secrete CXCR2 ligands, including CXCL1, CXCL2, and CXCL3 [129]. This process has been noted, for example, in colorectal cancer, where these chemokines played a significant role in cancer stem cell function and caused an increase in parathyroid hormone like hormone (PTHLH) expression in cancer cells, which promoted the formation of bone metastasis.

4.6.8. Tumor-Associated Macrophages

Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) are monocytes that, under the influence of factors from the tumor microenvironment, have been transformed into macrophages that participate in tumor growth [211,212]. They are recruited to the tumor niche by multiple factors. Although the most significant chemokine in this process is CCL2/MCP-1 [213,214], CXCL1 can also recruit monocytes into the tumor niche, but not all of them. CD14+ monocytes have CXCR2 expression and can respond to CXCL1 [215], but the level of CXCR2 expression in these cells is much lower than in neutrophils; therefore, monocytes are recruited less efficiently than neutrophils through this pathway [216]. In contrast, CD16+ monocytes lack expression of this receptor [215]. CXCL1 can also induce TAM recruitment indirectly by increasing the expression of CCL2/MCP-1 in cancer cells [207], one of the most important chemokines causing TAM recruitment to the tumor niche.
Following recruitment, monocytes are transformed in the tumor niche into M2d TAMs [212], characterized by pro- and anti-inflammatory markers. Since TAMs have CXCR2 expression [217], they can respond to CXCL1, which enhances M2 polarization of macrophages in the tumor niche [182,217,218]. For this reason, high CXCL1 expression increases the number of M2-polarized TAMs in tumor tumorigenesis, as demonstrated in the glioblastoma [218] and prostate cancer models [217]. M2 macrophages are macrophages with anti-inflammatory, pro-angiogenic, and immunosuppressive properties [212]. At the same time, macrophages with M2 polarity do not secrete CXCL1, unlike M1 macrophages [219]. In the tumor niche, TAMs have M2d polarity [212], i.e., they are characterized by both pro- and anti-inflammatory properties. Due to their pro-inflammatory characteristics, TAMs secrete CXCL1 in large amounts into the tumor microenvironment [182,220,221,222,223] and may be a major source of this chemokine in some types of cancer, such as gastric cancer [223]. Factors that increase the expression of this chemokine in TAMs are tumor cells, which are, for example, associated with the action of TNF-α [223] and VEGF [77].

4.6.9. Tumor-Associated Neutrophils

TANs are neutrophils recruited to the tumor niche and transformed into procancer cells that cause tumor growth [224]. At the same time, there are anticancer neutrophils with N1 polarization and procancer neutrophils with N2 polarization [225]. CXCL1 is a chemotactic factor for neutrophils [216,226,227,228]—for this reason, CXCL1 causes the recruitment of neutrophils into the tumor niche [185,228,229,230,231]. At the same time, CXCL1 recruits low-density neutrophils better than normal-density neutrophils [232].
During neutrophil recruitment, CXCL1 inhibits apoptosis of these cells, which leads to neutrophil accumulation at sites of high CXCL1 expression in this tumor [233]. Under the influence of factors from the tumor microenvironment, neutrophils transform into TANs. At the same time, neutrophils show some plasticity in their phenotype. CXCL1 induces the transition of normal-density neutrophils towards a low-density state [232], indicating this important influence of CXCL1 not only in the recruitment but also in the differentiation and function of TANs in the tumor niche.
Another important aspect of tumor function is the balance of TAN and TAM recruitment [231]. A decrease in the recruitment of either group results in an increase in the recruitment of the other group. With a decrease in TAM recruitment, there is an increase in CXCR2 ligand expression, leading to an increase in TAN recruitment to the tumor niche. Conversely, a decrease in TAN recruitment results in an increase in the expression of colony-stimulating factor 1 (CSF1) and CCL2/MCP-1 in the tumor, leading to an increase in TAM recruitment.
Neutrophils in the bone marrow have high CXCR2 expression, but in TAN tumors, they have low CXCR2 expression [234]. This may be due to the transformation of these cells into procancer cells. At the same time, CXCR2 is important in TAN plasticity in the tumor niche. CXCR2 enhances the polarization of TANs into anti-tumor cells—for this reason, lowering CXCR2 expression on TANs increases the procancer polarization of these cells [235].
In tumorigenesis, TANs produce CXCL1 as well as other CXCR2 ligands [70,234]. CXCL1 is involved in tumorigenesis, and the CXCL1-CXCR2 axis is also important in tumor cell–neutrophil interactions. In the tumor niche, cancer cells produce CXCL1 [236], which leads to the chemotaxis of neutrophils into the vicinity of cancer cells, as neutrophils have CXCR2 expression. Cancer cells, particularly breast cancer cells, also have the expression of β2-integrins, while neutrophils have the expression of intracellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) [236]. Both proteins can fuse with each other, which allows the two cells to interact directly. As a result, cancer cells begin to migrate [236]. TANs also participate in tumorigenesis through other pathways. These cells secrete lipocalin 2 (LCN2), which causes tumor cell migration through the activation of Src signaling and the induction of EMT [185]. TANs also cause angiogenesis, due to the secretion of CXCR2 ligands, which have pro-angiogenic properties [70,133,135,234]. TANs secrete VEGF [158]. TANs also secrete MMP9, which is responsible for VEGF bioavailability [70,159,160,161]. TANs secrete other proteases involved in tumor growth, including MMP2 [70]. TANs also secrete oncostatin M [165] and Bv8/prokineticin 2 [166], which have pro-angiogenic properties. Finally, TANs are involved in cancer immune evasion because they express arginase 1 (ARG1) and indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) [70].

4.6.10. Regulatory T Cells

Regulatory T cell (Treg) are T cells that regulate an overly intense immune system response. At the same time, there is an accumulation of these cells in the cancer tumor, resulting in tumor immune evasion [237], i.e., a decrease in the anti-tumor immune system response in the cancer tumor. Treg can be recruited to either the tumor niche or malignant pleural effusion depending on CXCL1 [74]. However, there is only one paper indicating the importance of CXCL1 in the recruitment of Treg. Probably, CXCL1 has a minor role in the recruitment of these cells and only in some models. Recruitment of Treg to the tumor niche is accomplished through many pathways, such as CCL2 [238], CCR4 ligands (CCL17 and CCL22) [239], CCR7 ligands (CCL19 and CCL21) [240], CCL18 [241], CXCR3 ligands (PF4, CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL11) [242], and CXCL12-CXCR4 axis [243]. CXCL1 may be one way to recruit these cells, but other secretory factors may be more important in this process.
Treg cells can also arise from naive CD4+ T cells [244]. Naive CD4+ T cells are recruited to the tumor niche by CXCL1 due to the expression of CXCR2 on these cells. Under the influence of factors in the tumor microenvironment, they can differentiate into Treg, a process which involves CXCL1 [244]. CXCL1 induces the differentiation of these cells into Treg and enhances the immunosuppressive function of these cells [244].

4.7. Migration and Metastasis of Cancer Cells

CXCL1 causes migration and invasion of cancer cells, which has been noted in many types of cancer, including bladder cancer [12], colorectal cancer [99,129,245], gastric cancer [16,101], glioblastoma [246] and prostate cancer [8,247]. It is associated with increased expression of MMP2, MMP7, MMP9 and MMP13 in cancer cells [12,129,246,248,249]. CXCL1 also induces cancer cell migration by inducing EMT of cancer cells [8,129]. Causing EMT of cancer cells is possible through the activation of Src family kinases [185]. This process is caused by CXCL1 as well as by other factors, including lipocalin 2 (LCN2), secreted by TANs recruited by CXCL1 into the tumor niche. Also important in the induction of EMT by CXCL1 is the activation of the CXCR2-PI3K-Snail pathway [96]. This causes a decrease in E-cadherin expression, resulting in the cancer cell acquiring a mesenchymal phenotype. CXCL1 also induces EMT through the activation of the NF-κB-sex-determining region Y-related (SRY) high-mobility group box 4 (SOX4) pathway, as observed in breast cancer cells [221].
Cancer cell migration can also occur through the cooperation of multiple types of chemokines. CXCR2 activation results in the activation of NF-κB and STAT3 [250], which leads to an increase in the expression of CXCR4 and CXCR2, respectively. This increases the action of CXCR2 ligands as well as CXCL12, leading to EMT and migration of cancer cells. This mechanism has been noted in gastric cancer [250]. During migration and invasion, tumor cells move from the developed cancerous tumor to the adjacent tissue, where they appear as either single cells or small clusters in non-cancerous tissue. This is called “tumor budding” [251], a process that is dependent on several factors. High expression of CXCR2 ligands, including CXCL1, is positively correlated with tumor budding, at least in colorectal cancer [252].
One of the “hallmarks of cancer” is metastasis [253]. It involves the colonization of distant organs by cancer cells from the primary tumor. At the same time, metastasis is a highly inefficient process. It is estimated that, from just 1 g of tumor tissue, about 1 million cancer cells are released into the blood in just one day [254]. These cells will produce only a single metastasis during the years of cancer.
The most likely site for metastasis to form and develop is the primary tumor. This means that circulating tumor cells return to the primary tumor [255]—a process called “tumor self-seeding”. Then, cancer cells recruited to the primary tumor proliferate in the primary tumor, which results in more aggressive cells with a greater capacity to resist apoptosis and an increased ability to migrate and metastasize to other organs. One of the factors driving the recruitment of circulating tumor cells into the tumor niche of the primary tumor is IL-6 and CXCR2 ligands, such as CXCL1 [255].
Due to the high inefficiency of metastasis formation, processes are required that facilitate this process, at least at one stage of metastasis. CXCL1 acts on some of these; this chemokine causes the release of more cancer cells into the blood. For this reason, blood levels of CXCL1 in patients with colorectal cancer [256] and breast cancer [256] are positively correlated with the number of circulating tumor cells. More tumor cells in the blood means a higher likelihood of metastasis.
CXCL1 also facilitates metastasis formation by affecting the formation of pre-metastatic niche [257]. A cancer cell will not become metastatic if it accidentally appears in a healthy tissue. For metastasis to form, a healthy tissue must be transformed into an environment that facilitates the growth of a cancerous tumor—a process called pre-metastatic niche formation. An example of this is the increase in CXCL1 expression in the liver in colorectal cancer [77], which results in the recruitment of MDSCs to the liver. Subsequently, MDSCs cause cancer cell survival in the liver, which means that MDSCs facilitate the formation of liver metastasis by colorectal cancer, whose primary tumor is in the intestines [77].
CXCL1 expression in a tumor cell is increased during EMT-induced cell migration. This is associated with the attachment of Snail to the CXCL1 promoter [46]. This directly causes an increase in the expression of CXCL1. Also, Snail increases the activation of NF-κB, which is the most important transcription factor that increases CXCL1 expression [46]. CXCL2 expression is also increased by these two mechanisms. Snail is an important transcription factor causing EMT in cancer cells [47]. For this reason, during EMT, a cancer cell increases the expression of CXCL1. Then, such a cell migrates within the organ or enters the blood. For this reason, circulating tumor cells show CXCL1 expression, which is important in further stages of invasion or metastasis.
CXCL1 is involved in the formation of bone metastasis. Cancer cells isolated from bone metastasis show a secretory phenotype that facilitates bone metastasis. At least in prostate cancer, cancer cells from bone metastasis show expression of fibroblast growth factor (FGF)3, FGF19, growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15), and CXCL1, among others [258]. GDF-15 can both cause osteoclast differentiation and inhibit osteoblast differentiation [259]. CXCL1 increases the adhesion capacity of tumor cells to type I collagen, a major component of ECM in bones, as observed in prostate cancer cells [71]. Due to this adhesion, circulating tumor cells are more easily retained in bones, which increases the likelihood of bone metastasis.
CXCL1 also causes osteolysis, which is related to the stimulation of osteoclast maturation by this chemokine [258,260,261,262]. Osteoclasts cause bone remodeling, which leads to the development of bone metastasis. Osteoclast precursor cells have CXCR2 expression [260,263]; following the differentiation of these cells into osteoclasts, CXCR2 expression is reduced [260]. CXCL1 also increases PTHLH expression in cancer cells [129]; PTHLH and parathyroid hormone (PTH) cause an increase in CXCR2 ligand expression in osteoblasts, as shown by studies in mouse and rat cells [263]. PTHLH, PTH, and CXCR2 ligands cause bone remodeling by acting on osteoclasts during bone metastasis formation.
In addition to cancer cells, CXCL1 in bones may also come from bone marrow adipocytes, which increase the expression of CXCR2 ligands under the influence of factors from cancer cells, as shown by experiments on mouse cells [261]. The number of bone marrow adipocytes is elevated in older people or those with obesity, meaning that if they have prostate cancer, they are more likely to have bone metastasis [261].
CXCL1 is also involved in the formation of lung metastasis. It is secreted by human pulmonary artery endothelial cells [264] and human pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells [265]. It acts on circulating tumor cells that express CXCR2—activation of this receptor leads to activation of NF-κB in these cells. This process is dependent on the activation of the CXCR2–focal adhesion kinase (FAK)–PI3K-Akt/PKB-NF-κB pathway. As a result of NF-κB activation, there is an increase in vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) expression in circulating tumor cells [264,266], which facilitates the attachment of tumor cells to blood vessel walls, particularly to β1-integrin [265]. VCAM-1 is also involved in transendothelial migration of tumor cells in the lungs. These mechanisms facilitate lung metastasis, as observed in osteosarcoma [264].
CXCL1 may also be involved in the formation of brain metastasis. The formation of Breast cancer brain metastasis (BCBM) is dependent on the ligands CXCR2 and c-Met [267]. c-Met triggers the secretion of IL-1β from cancer cells, which then induces the activation of NF-κB in astrocytes. This leads to the secretion of hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) by these cells and activation on the cancer cell of c-Met, thus increasing the expression of IL-1β and CXCR2 ligands, namely, CXCL1 and CXCL8/IL-8 [267]. These ligands cause angiogenesis in the early stages of brain metastasis, i.e., they allow perivascular niche formation. Also, brain metastatic papillary thyroid carcinoma tumors have higher CXCL1 expression than either non-brain metastatic papillary thyroid carcinoma or primary brain tumors [268]. This indicates some role of CXCL1 in the formation or function of brain metastasis, at least in papillary thyroid carcinoma.
CXCL1 may also be important in metastasis to the intraperitoneal cavity as found in ovarian cancer in a mouse model [269]. CXCR2 ligands are synthesized in omental milky spots, adipose tissues, and blood vessels, as shown by experiments on animal material. These ligands are important in the formation of intraperitoneal cavity metastasis of ovarian cancer [269].
CXCL1 is an important driver of lymphatic metastasis. Cancer cells secrete factors that increase CXCL1 expression in LECs [167,249]. CXCL1 then causes cancer cells to migrate into the lymphatic vasculature. Also, other secretory factors such as CXCL5, CXCL6, CCL2, CCL7, and CCL20 are secreted by LECs in greater amounts [167]. These factors can also cause lymph node metastasis by the same mechanism. CXCL1 can cause lymphangiogenesis if it acts on LECs [168]. CXCL1 can cause tumor cell migration. An increase in CXCL1 levels in areas of lymphangiogenesis causes cancer cells to enter lymphatic vessels. CXCL1 is also important in downstream lymph node metastasis. Cancer tumors secrete CXCL1, which results in the recruitment of G-MDSCs to the lymph node at the early stages of metastasis [270]. These cells secrete TGF-β1, which is important in the formation of lymph node metastasis.
Once metastasis is initiated, the primary tumor can inhibit further metastatic development. One component of this process is CXCL1. In a subline of cancer cells with a highly metastatic potential, CXCL1 causes an increase in E-cadherin expression and a decrease in MMP2 expression [271]. This means that CXCL1 from the primary tumor inhibits EMT in cancer cells located in metastasis. This mechanism has been noted in malignant melanoma [271]. For this reason, surgical removal of primary tumor malignant melanoma is sometimes followed by a rapid development of metastasis.

5. Whole-Body Dysfunctions Associated with Cancer

Cancer is not a disease involving just a particular single organ, but cancer affects the entire body. Advanced long-term cancer is associated with many systemic symptoms and dysfunctions of organs not directly affected by the disease. This is due to chronic inflammation throughout the body, associated with the cancer tumor’s release of various factors, including CXCL1, into the bloodstream. Examples of tumor-associated dysfunction include cancer cachexia [272], cancer-associated immunodeficiency [202,273], neuroinflammatory-mediated affective-like behaviors [274], bone cancer pain [275,276] and dysfunction of the circulatory system and kidneys [277].
Cancer cachexia is a symptom of advanced cancer involving a decrease in body weight, particularly muscle mass. The condition is associated with chronic inflammation throughout the body [272] and exposure of the muscles to cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, and interferon-γ (IFN-γ). CXCL1 also plays a role in this process. Patients suffering from many types of cancer have elevated levels of CXCL1 in their blood, resulting in elevated exposure of their muscles [142,186,278]. In addition, factors secreted by a tumor increase CXCL1 expression in the muscles [279], which leads to the infiltration of skeletal muscles by neutrophils and M2 macrophages which then interfere with the differentiation of satellite cells—muscle stem cells responsible for muscle regeneration. The disruption of satellite cells reduces the ability to regenerate muscles, which is one of the elements of cancer-associated muscle wasting. At the same time, CXCL1 seems to have a destructive effect only when chronically acting on muscles. In a short-term action, it stimulates satellite cell proliferation and increases muscle regeneration and growth, i.e., it is a myokine [280].
Cancer is also associated with a systemic reduction in immunity, for example, an increased risk of respiratory infections among patients with advanced cancer [273]. One component of cancer-associated immunodeficiency is CXCL1. CXCR2 ligands cause the expansion of M-MDSCs [200,203], increasing the number of these cells in the bone marrow and spleen and thus in the bloodstream, resulting in a reduced immune response. A malignant tumor also increases the number of G-MDSCs in the bloodstream [65]. It secretes TGF-β [202], a cytokine that causes an increase in the expression of CXCR2 ligands in the liver, which results in the infiltration of this organ by G-MDSCs and a decrease in its immune function. Decreased immune function is associated with susceptibility to respiratory infection in patients with advanced cancer—a result of a chronic elevation of CXCL1 levels in the blood. Short-term increases in CXCL1 result in the mobilization of neutrophils from the bone marrow and the enhancement of the immune system [281].
Advanced cancer is also associated with impaired circulatory and renal function [277]. Cancer induces the activation of neutrophils, which then form neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs). In part, this is related to an increase in CXCL1 levels in the blood, as this chemokine can enhance neutrophil function and NET formation [282]. NETs form complexes with platelets; such complexes accumulate in the bloodstream and in the kidneys, damaging these organs. An increase in CXCL1 expression in the kidneys increases the infiltration of this organ by neutrophils, which then damages the organ [277].
Animal experiments have shown that cancer causes neuroinflammation-mediated affective-like behaviors [274], although it is unclear whether this is a result of cancer or increased awareness of the condition. Experiments on rodents have shown that a cancer tumor increases the level of CXCR2 ligands in the blood [274] and increases the expression of CXCR2 ligands in the hippocampus [274], although the latter may be the result of increased levels of IL-1β [283,284]. An increase in the expression of CXCR2 ligands is sufficient to give rise to affective-like behaviors [284,285].
Bone cancer or bone metastases are associated with bone cancer pain, which has been studied in laboratory animals. Cancerous tumors in bone secrete various factors that increase the expression of CXCR2 ligands in astrocytes in the spinal cord [275,286] and periaqueductal gray [276]. These chemokines activate their receptor CXCR2 on neurons, which causes bone cancer pain [275,276]. The increase in CXCR2 ligand expression in the spinal cord may be dependent on the activation of ephrin receptor B1 (EPHB1) by ephrinB in astrocytes and microglial cells [287], which causes an increase in TLR4 expression and the secretion of the cytokines IL-1β and TNF-α.

6. Patient Characteristics Versus Cancer and CXCL1

6.1. Obesity and Cancer

It is estimated that about 39% of the world’s population is overweight [288]. The largest percentage of overweight and obese populations is in North America and Europe, where about 60% of the population is overweight and about 25% is obese; these values have been steadily increasing for more than 30 years. The levels of obesity and overweight are also high and steadily increasing in other regions of the world. Abnormally high body weight is associated with the risk of contracting many diseases, including liver disease [289], diabetes [290], coronary heart disease [290], and many others. However, obesity is not associated with an increased risk of all cancers [290]. It may only increase the risk of certain cancers, such as esophageal adenocarcinoma, renal cancer and leukemia, and in women, postmenopausal breast cancer and endometrial cancer [291]. A higher body mass index (BMI) is associated with a reduced risk of lung cancer and, in women, premenopausal breast cancer [291]. Obesity also increases cancer aggressiveness. Prostate cancer patients [292] with obesity have a higher mortality rate compared with lean individuals with this cancer. Cancer in a patient with obesity is different from cancer in a slim patient in terms of the tumor microenvironment. CXCL1 may be responsible for the differences in cancer between patients with different BMIs.
Obesity is associated with chronic inflammation. It causes increased levels of CXCL1 in the blood of non-cancerous individuals [293] and increased expression of this chemokine in omental adipose tissue [294]. Also, obesity is associated with increased CXCL1 expression in the tumor of many cancers, such as breast cancer [295] and prostate cancer [180]. In slim prostate cancer patients, CXCL1 expression is at low levels [180]. Also, saturated fatty acids (SFAs), especially palmitate, can increase CXCR2 ligand secretion from hepatocellular carcinoma cells, as shown by experiments on H4IIE rat hepatoma cells [296]. Autocrine activation of CXCR2 on these cells inhibits apoptosis caused by a lipotoxic environment. CXCL1 also induces the migration and metastasis of tumor cells and causes the recruitment of various cells into the tumor niche. Particularly, it causes the recruitment of G-MDSCs and thus contributes to cancer immune evasion [295].
CXCL1 may also be important in the communication between the cancer cell and cancer-associated adipocytes (CAAs) [174]. Under the influence of the tumor microenvironment, normal adipocytes are transformed into CAAs. The significance of these cells in breast cancer is very well understood [173]. They produce many factors including CCL2, CCL5, VEGF, leptin, adiponectin, IL-6, and pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β and TNF-α [173]. In addition, CAAs secrete LIF, which causes migration and invasion of breast cancer cells [174]. At the same time, LIF also causes a STAT3-dependent increase due to breast cancer cell secretion of CXCR2 ligands such as CXCL1, CXCL2, CXCL3, and CXCL8/IL-8. In turn, these chemokines cause an increase in LIF production by CAAs, dependent on the activation of the ERK MAPK-NF-κB and ERK MAPK-STAT3 pathways [174]. CXCR2 activation on adipocytes also increases CCL2 and CCL6 expression [297], an effect observed in obese mice but not in lean mice. Factors secreted by adipocytes lead to the recruitment of TAMs into the tumor niche and proliferation of tumor cells, as shown by experiments on ovarian cancer mice. This contributes to the progression of this cancer.
Obesity and adipocytes may also contribute to bone metastasis. In obese individuals as in older people, there is an increase in bone marrow adiposity [261], which means that the number of adipocytes in the bone marrow increases. As adipocytes are the source of CXCR2 ligands, in the initial stages of bone metastasis, a greater amount of CXCR2 ligands results in increased osteoclast activity and thus bone remodeling. CXCL1 also causes the mobilization from WAT of ASCs and the recruitment of these cells to the tumor niche, as demonstrated in a prostate cancer model [180]. However, this process is also dependent on other chemokines, including CXCL8/IL-8. In addition, CXCR1 appears to be the main receptor responsible for the mobilization and recruitment of ASCs by CXCL1 and CXCL8/IL-8 [180]. ASCs secrete many factors in large numbers, including CXCL1, CXCL8/IL-8, CX3C motif chemokine ligand 1 (CX3CL1)/fractalkine, CCL2, and plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI1) [298]. These factors are involved in tumorigenesis—they cause angiogenesis, migration, and metastasis of tumor cells and recruit various cells into the tumor niche.
Adiponectin, a factor produced by adipose tissue, causes an increase in CXCL1 secretion from ovarian cancer cells [299] and colon cancer cells [120,300]. CXCL1 is involved in cancer processes, including either angiogenesis or stromal cell senescence. As obese individuals have reduced levels of adiponectin in the blood [301,302], obesity may be associated with a reduced aggressiveness of ovarian cancer and colon cancer. Nevertheless, this does not offset other procancer mechanisms associated with obesity.
Another adipokine is leptin whose levels are positively correlated with BMI [303,304]. Studies on mice have shown that leptin causes an increase in the expression of IL-6, IL-1β, and keratinocyte-derived chemokine (KC) in the colon [305]. KC is a CXC sub-family chemokine, a mouse paralog for human CXCL1, almost always equated with this chemokine. The pro-inflammatory effects of leptin on the colon may contribute to chronic colon inflammation and colon cancer [305]. On the other hand, studies on HT-29 colon cancer cells have shown that leptin does not increase CXCL1 expression in these cells [300]. It is likely that leptin does not increase CXCL1 expression in colon cancer tumors, although its effect in other cancers needs to be confirmed experimentally.
Obesity also causes an increase in visfetin (other names NAMPT and PBEF) in the blood of healthy people [306] and visfatin production in tumors as shown by experiments on gastric cancer mice [307]. Visfatin is also produced by many cancers including breast cancer [308], colorectal cancer [309], melanoma [310], and prostate cancer [311]. Visferin stimulates cancer cell growth, enables anchorage-independent growth, and invasion of cancer cells [311]. It also induces M2 polarization of macrophages in the tumor niche which results in increased production and secretion of CXCL1 by TAM [308]. This chemokine is involved in cancer processes, including angiogenesis [133], migration, and invasion of cancer cells [308].

6.2. Patient Age

Cancers are associated with the aging of people, which is a certain mechanism, or consequence, of aging in the body. There are chronic inflammatory reactions in the tissues of older people. An example of this is prostate fibroblasts, which in older people secrete increased amounts of CXCR2 ligands, such as CXCL1 [175]. This leads to benign prostatic hypertrophy, which is a pre-cancerous condition of prostate cancer.
A greater patient age affects tumorigenic processes in gastric cancer tumors, but this depends on the type of cancer. In gastric cancer tumors, elevated levels of CXCL1 are found in older patients than in younger patients [312]. This was also confirmed by studies of colon adenocarcinoma tumors [313,314]. Other studies, for example, on colorectal cancer, have shown an inverse relationship—in patients under 65 years of age, CXCL1 expression in the tumor was higher than in those over 65 [315]. In prostate cancer, on the other hand, the age of the patient had no effect the level of CXCL1 in the tumor [316]. Older people have a higher number of adipocytes in the bone marrow [261]. These cells under the influence of cancer cells produce CXCR2 ligands, as shown by experiments on mouse cells. For this reason, bone marrow adipocytes facilitate the formation of bone metastasis in elderly people.
Due to advances in the knowledge of tumor mechanisms in cancerous tumors, therapeutic approaches that target only one tumor mechanism are being developed. This is called molecular targeted cancer therapy [317]. Such therapeutic approaches have great potential because they can individually approach each patient. To better develop such therapy, it is necessary to better understand the impact of a patient’s age on tumor mechanisms in a cancerous tumor. Currently, this research aspect is very rarely studied.

6.3. Fertility

Higher fertility reduces the likelihood of ovarian cancer in women [318]. This is related to CXCL1 as indicated by animal experiments. For example, experiments in mice have shown that nulliparous animals have reduced levels of CXCR2 ligands in the blood [319]. In turn, higher fertility results in decreased expression of CXCR2 ligands in omental fat band and peritoneal serous fluid [320]. In the case of ovarian cancer formation, the level of CXCR2 ligands in the omental fat band in nulliparous animals is higher than in parous mice [320].
Changes in the expression of CXCR2 ligands as well as other genes affect the development of ovarian cancer, particularly the peritoneal cancer index. Increased expression of CXCL1 in the omental fat band promotes the formation of intraperitoneal cavity metastasis of ovarian cancer [269,320]. This means that women who have given birth to more children are less likely to develop ovarian cancer, and if they do, this cancer is less likely to give rise to intraperitoneal cavity metastasis.

7. Summary

CXCL1 participates in numerous cancer-related mechanisms that we summarize in the final figure of this article (Figure 4). Based on the available experimental studies, it can be stated that CXCL1 potentially influences almost all cancer-related processes, at least theoretically. However, it should be emphasized that each of them depends on many different factors (with CXCL1 representing only one of them), which vary in significance. In one type of cancer, a particular process may depend predominantly on one factor, whereas in another cancer, it may depend on a different factor, while the remaining ones may play only a minor role.
Additional complexity arises from the presence of other CXCR2 ligands. Besides CXCL1, six additional chemokines act as CXCR2 ligands and share very similar biological properties. The main differences between them lie in the regulation of their expression. As a result, some of the functions attributed here to CXCL1 may also be performed by these other chemokines.
In this review, we focus on the potential molecular mechanisms through which CXCL1 participates in cancer-related processes. At the same time, this article is primarily theoretical in nature. Its important limitation lies in the lack of analysis of the relative significance of CXCL1 in specific cancer-related processes across different tumor types. In other words, the involvement of CXCL1 in a particular cancer-related process may not occur in certain types of cancer.
The association between CXCL1 and cancer-related processes in specific cancers was previously analyzed using bioinformatic tools in our earlier article titled “Bioinformatic Analysis of the CXCR2 Ligands in Cancer Processes” (https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241713287) [321]. In that study, we examined correlations in clinical samples not only for CXCL1 but for all CXCR2 ligands across the cancer-related processes discussed. For this reason, the present review can be considered a theoretical extension of that bioinformatic study. Both articles should therefore be read and interpreted together to obtain a more comprehensive understanding of the role of CXCL1 in cancer-related processes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.K.; M.B.; investigation, M.B.; E.D.-B.; P.P.; M.L.; I.W.; K.B.; writing—original draft preparation, J.K.; M.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the statutory budget of the Department of Biochemistry and Department of Endodontic Surgery at Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Poland.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

αSMAα smooth muscle actin
ACKR1Atypical chemokine receptor 1
ARG1Arginase 1
ASCAdipose stromal cell
BBPBenzyl butyl phthalate
BMIBody mass index
BM-MSCBone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell
CAACancer-associated adipocyte
CAFCancer-associated fibroblast
CDK2Cyclin-dependent kinase 2
CMLChronic myeloid leukemia
COX-2Cyclooxygenase-2
CSF1Colony-stimulating factor 1
CTGFConnective tissue growth factor
CX3CL1 CX3C motif chemokine ligand 1
CXCLCXC motif chemokine ligand
CXCL4L1CXC motif chemokine ligand 4 variant 1
CXCRCXC motif chemokine receptor
DARCDuffy antigen receptor for chemokines
DEHPDi-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
ECMExtracellular matrix
EGF Epidermal growth factor
EGFREpidermal growth factor receptor
EMTEpithelial-to-mesenchymal transition
EPCEndothelial progenitor cell
EPHB1Ephrin receptor B1
ERKExtracellular signal-regulated kinase
FADDFas-associated via death domain
FAKFocal adhesion kinase
FGFFibroblast growth factor
G-CSFGranulocyte colony-stimulating factor
GDF-15Growth differentiation factor 15
GLUT1Glucose transporter type 1
GM-CSFGranulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor
G-MDSCGranulocytic-myeloid-derived suppressor cell
GMPGranulocyte and macrophage progenitor cell
GPR35G-protein-coupled receptor 35
HB-EGFHeparin-binding EGF-like growth factor
HBVHepatitis B virus
HCVHepatitis C virus
HDAC1Histone deacetylase 1
HEYLHes-related family bHLH transcription factor with YRPW motif like
HGFHepatocyte growth factor
HHV8Human herpes virus-8
HIVHuman immunodeficiency virus
HK2Hexokinase 2
HLA-DRHuman leukocyte antigen-group DR
HSP90Heat shock protein
HUVECHuman umbilical vein endothelial cell
ICAM-1Intracellular adhesion molecule 1
IDOIndoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase
IFN-γInterferon-γ
IGF-1Insulin-like growth factor 1
IKKInhibitor of NF-κB kinase
ILInterleukin
KCKeratinocyte-derived chemokine
KSHVKaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpes virus
LAMC1Laminin subunit gamma 1
LCN2Lipocalin 2
LDHALactate dehydrogenase A
LECLymphatic endothelial cell
LIFLeukemia inhibitory factor
MAPKMitogen-activated protein kinase
MCP-1Monocyte chemoattractant protein 1
Mdm2Murine double minute 2
M-MDSCMonocytic-myeloid-derived suppressor cell
MMPMetalloproteinase
MSCMesenchymal stem cell
mTORC1Mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1
NETNeutrophil extracellular trap
NF-κBNuclear factor κB
NIKNF-κB-inducing kinase
NKNatural killer cell
NTNeurotensin
PAI1Plasminogen activator inhibitor 1
PD-L1Programmed death-ligand 1
PF4Platelet-derived factor 4
PGE2Prostaglandin E2
PI3KPhosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3 kinase
PKBProtein kinase B
PTH Parathyroid hormone
PTHLHParathyroid hormone-like hormone
RANTESRegulated on activation, normally T cell expressed and secreted
RIPK1Receptor interacting serine/threonine kinase 1
SAP18Sin3A associated protein 18
SASPSenescence-associated secretory phenotype
SDF-1Stromal-derived factor-1
SETD2Histone H3 lysine 36 methyltransferase SET-domain-containing 2
SFASaturated fatty acid
SOX4High-mobility group box 4
SRYSex-determining region Y-related
STATSignal transducer and activator of transcription
TADCTumor-associated dendritic cell
TAMTumor-associated macrophage
TANTumor-associated neutrophil
TNF-αTumor necrosis factor-α
TregRegulatory T cell
TβRIITGF-β type II receptor
VCAM-1Vascular cell adhesion molecule 1
VEGFRVascular endothelial growth factor receptor
WATWhite adipose tissue

References

  1. Hughes, C.; Nibbs, R. A Guide to Chemokines and Their Receptors. FEBS J. 2018, 285, 2944–2971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zlotnik, A.; Yoshie, O. Chemokines: A New Classification System and Their Role in Immunity. Immunity 2000, 12, 121–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ruytinx, P.; Proost, P.; Struyf, S. CXCL4 and CXCL4L1 in cancer. Cytokine 2018, 16, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Nomiyama, H.; Osada, N.; Yoshie, O. Systematic classification of vertebrate chemokines based on conserved synteny and evolutionary history. Genes Cells 2013, 18, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Loetscher, P.; Seitz, M.; Clark-Lewis, I.; Baggiolini, M.; Moser, B. Both interleukin-8 receptors independently mediate chemotaxis. Jurkat cells transfected with IL-8R1 or IL-8R2 migrate in response to IL-8, GRO alpha and NAP-2. FEBS Lett. 1994, 341, 187–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ahuja, S.; Murphy, P. The CXC Chemokines Growth-Regulated Oncogene (GRO) Alpha, GRObeta, GROgamma, Neutrophil-Activating Peptide-2, and Epithelial Cell-Derived Neutrophil-Activating Peptide-78 Are Potent Agonists for the Type B, but Not the Type A, Human Interleukin-8 Receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 20545–20550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wuyts, A.; Proost, P.; Lenaerts, J.; Ben-Baruch, A.; Van Damme, J.; Wang, J. Differential Usage of the CXC Chemokine Receptors 1 and 2 by Interleukin-8, Granulocyte Chemotactic Protein-2 and Epithelial-Cell-Derived Neutrophil Attractant-78. Eur. J. Biochem. 1998, 255, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kuo, P.; Shen, K.; Hung, S.; Hsu, Y. CXCL1/GROα Increases Cell Migration and Invasion of Prostate Cancer by Decreasing Fibulin-1 Expression through NF-κB/HDAC1 Epigenetic Regulation. Carcinogenesis 2012, 33, 2477–2487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Neote, K.; Mak, J.Y.; Kolakowski, L.F., Jr.; Schall, T.J. Functional and biochemical analysis of the cloned Duffy antigen: Identity with the red blood cell chemokine receptor. Blood 1994, 84, 44–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dawson, T.C.; Lentsch, A.B.; Wang, Z.; Cowhig, J.E.; Rot, A.; Maeda, N.; Peiper, S.C. Exaggerated response to endotoxin in mice lacking the Duffy antigen/receptor for chemokines (DARC). Blood 2000, 96, 1681–1684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Nomiyama, H.; Mera, A.; Ohneda, O.; Miura, R.; Suda, T.; Yoshie, O. Organization of the chemokine genes in the human and mouse major clusters of CC and CXC chemokines: Diversification between the two species. Genes. Immun. 2001, 2, 110–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Kawanishi, H.; Matsui, Y.; Ito, M.; Watanabe, J.; Takahashi, T.; Nishizawa, K.; Nishiyama, H.; Kamoto, T.; Mikami, Y.; Tanaka, Y.; et al. Secreted CXCL1 is a potential mediator and marker of the tumor invasion of bladder cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2008, 14, 2579–2587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sun, J.; Yuan, J. Chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 1/chemokine (C-X-C motif) receptor 2 autocrine loop contributes to cellular proliferation, migration and apoptosis in cervical cancer. Bioengineered 2022, 13, 7579–7591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Le Rolle, A.F.; Chiu, T.K.; Fara, M.; Shia, J.; Zeng, Z.; Weiser, M.R.; Paty, P.B.; Chiu, V.K. The prognostic significance of CXCL1 hypersecretion by human colorectal cancer epithelia and myofibroblasts. J. Transl. Med. 2015, 13, 199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wang, L.; Zhang, C.; Xu, J.; Wu, H.; Peng, J.; Cai, S.; He, Y. CXCL1 gene silencing inhibits HGC803 cell migration and invasion and acts as an independent prognostic factor for poor survival in gastric cancer. Mol. Med. Rep. 2016, 14, 4673–4679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Chen, X.; Chen, R.; Jin, R.; Huang, Z. The role of CXCL chemokine family in the development and progression of gastric cancer. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2020, 13, 484–492. [Google Scholar]
  17. Richmond, A.; Lawson, D.; Nixon, D.; Chawla, R. Characterization of Autostimulatory and Transforming Growth Factors from Human Melanoma Cells. Cancer Res. 1985, 45, 6390–6394. [Google Scholar]
  18. Yang, J.; Richmond, A. Constitutive IkappaB Kinase Activity Correlates with Nuclear Factor-kappaB Activation in Human Melanoma Cells. Cancer Res. 2001, 61, 4901–4909. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  19. Killian, P.; Kronski, E.; Michalik, K.; Barbieri, O.; Astigiano, S.; Sommerhoff, C.; Pfeffer, U.; Nerlich, A.; Bachmeier, B. Curcumin Inhibits Prostate Cancer Metastasis in Vivo by Targeting the Inflammatory Cytokines CXCL1 and -2. Carcinogenesis 2012, 33, 2507–2519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jin, Y.; Lin, Q.; Fei, H.; Xue, L.; Li, L.; Xi, Q.; Jiang, H. Bioinformatics Analysis of Potential Therapeutic Targets and Prognostic Biomarkers amid CXC Chemokines in Ovarian Carcinoma Microenvironment. J. Oncol. 2021, 2021, 8859554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Li, W.; Ma, J.; Sheng, X.; Xiao, C. Screening of CXC Chemokines in the Microenvironment of Ovarian Cancer and the Biological Function of CXCL10. World J. Surg. Oncol. 2021, 19, 329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, F.; Yuan, C.; Wu, H.; Liu, B.; Yang, Y. Bioinformatics, Molecular Docking and Experiments In Vitro Analyze the Prognostic Value of CXC Chemokines in Breast Cancer. Front. Oncol. 2021, 11, 665080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Wang, Y.; Huang, J.; Tian, Z.; Zhou, Y.; Yang, J. The Role of CXC Cytokines as Biomarkers and Potential Targets in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Math. Biosci. Eng. 2019, 17, 1381–1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Yu, L.; Yang, X.; Xu, C.; Sun, J.; Fang, Z.; Pan, H.; Han, W. Comprehensive Analysis of the Expression and Prognostic Value of CXC Chemokines in Colorectal Cancer. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2020, 89, 107077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhou, X.; Peng, M.; He, Y.; Peng, J.; Zhang, X.; Wang, C.; Xia, X.; Song, W. CXC Chemokines as Therapeutic Targets and Prognostic Biomarkers in Skin Cutaneous Melanoma Microenvironment. Front. Oncol. 2021, 11, 619003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Acharyya, S.; Oskarsson, T.; Vanharanta, S.; Malladi, S.; Kim, J.; Morris, P.; Manova-Todorova, K.; Leversha, M.; Hogg, N.; Seshan, V.; et al. A CXCL1 Paracrine Network Links Cancer Chemoresistance and Metastasis. Cell 2012, 150, 165–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yang, X.; Brown, K.; Landi, M.; Ghiorzo, P.; Badenas, C.; Xu, M.; Hayward, N.; Calista, D.; Landi, G.; Bruno, W.; et al. Duplication of CXC Chemokine Genes on Chromosome 4q13 in a Melanoma-Prone Family. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2012, 25, 243–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Aylon, Y.; Oren, M. P53: Guardian of Ploidy. Mol. Oncol. 2011, 5, 315–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. O’Connor, P.; Jackman, J.; Bae, I.; Myers, T.; Fan, S.; Mutoh, M.; Scudiero, D.; Monks, A.; Sausville, E.; Weinstein, J.; et al. Characterization of the P53 Tumor Suppressor Pathway in Cell Lines of the National Cancer Institute Anticancer Drug Screen and Correlations with the Growth-Inhibitory Potency of 123 Anticancer Agents. Cancer Res. 1997, 57, 4285–4300. [Google Scholar]
  30. Graeber, T.; Osmanian, C.; Jacks, T.; Housman, D.; Koch, C.; Lowe, S.; Giaccia, A. Hypoxia-Mediated Selection of Cells with Diminished Apoptotic Potential in Solid Tumours. Nature 1996, 379, 88–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Solomon, H.; Buganim, Y.; Kogan-Sakin, I.; Pomeraniec, L.; Assia, Y.; Madar, S.; Goldstein, I.; Brosh, R.; Kalo, E.; Beatus, T.; et al. Various P53 Mutant Proteins Differently Regulate the Ras Circuit to Induce a Cancer-Related Gene Signature. J. Cell Sci. 2012, 125, 3144–3152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Carrà, G.; Lingua, M.; Maffeo, B.; Taulli, R.; Morotti, A. P53 vs NF-κB: The Role of Nuclear Factor-Kappa B in the Regulation of P53 Activity and Vice Versa. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2020, 77, 4449–4458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yan, W.; Chen, X. Identification of GRO1 as a Critical Determinant for Mutant P53 Gain of Function. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 12178–12187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. De Souza, C.; Madden, J.; Minn, D.; Kumar, V.; Montoya, D.; Nambiar, R.; Zhu, Z.; Xiao, W.; Tahmassebi, N.; Kathi, H.; et al. The P72R Polymorphism in R248Q/W P53 Mutants Modifies the Mutant Effect on Epithelial to Mesenchymal Transition Phenotype and Cell Invasion via CXCL1 Expression. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 8025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Woodstock, D.; Sammons, M.; Fischer, M. P63 and P53: Collaborative Partners or Dueling Rivals? Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021, 9, 701986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Somerville, T.; Biffi, G.; Daßler-Plenker, J.; Hur, S.; He, X.; Vance, K.; Miyabayashi, K.; Xu, Y.; Maia-Silva, D.; Klingbeil, O.; et al. Squamous Trans-Differentiation of Pancreatic Cancer Cells Promotes Stromal Inflammation. eLife 2020, 9, e53381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Shattuck, R.; Wood, L.; Jaffe, G.; Richmond, A. MGSA/GRO Transcription Is Differentially Regulated in Normal Retinal Pigment Epithelial and Melanoma Cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1994, 14, 791–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Devalaraja, M.; Wang, D.; Ballard, D.; Richmond, A. Elevated Constitutive IkappaB Kinase Activity and IkappaB-Alpha Phosphor-Ylation in Hs294T Melanoma Cells Lead to Increased Basal MGSA/GRO-Alpha Transcription. Cancer Res. 1999, 59, 1372–1377. [Google Scholar]
  39. Dhawan, P.; Richmond, A. A Novel NF-Kappa B-Inducing Kinase-MAPK Signaling Pathway up-Regulates NF-Kappa B Activity in Melanoma Cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 7920–7928, Correction in J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 298, 102315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Son, D.; Kabir, S.; Dong, Y.; Lee, E.; Adunyah, S. Inhibitory Effect of Tumor Suppressor P53 on Proinflammatory Chemokine Expression in Ovarian Cancer Cells by Reducing Proteasomal Degradation of IκB. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e51116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Wang, W.; Wu, J.; Mukherjee, A.; He, T.; Wang, X.; Ma, Y.; Fang, X. Lysophosphatidic Acid Induces Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha to Regulate a pro-Inflammatory Cytokine Network in Ovarian Cancer. FASEB J. 2020, 34, 13935–13948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kogan-Sakin, I.; Cohen, M.; Paland, N.; Madar, S.; Solomon, H.; Molchadsky, A.; Brosh, R.; Buganim, Y.; Goldfinger, N.; Klocker, H.; et al. Prostate Stromal Cells Produce CXCL-1, CXCL-2, CXCL-3 and IL-8 in Response to Epithelia-Secreted IL-1. Carcinogenesis 2009, 30, 698–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Tannenbaum, C.; Rayman, P.; Pavicic, P.; Kim, J.; Wei, W.; Polefko, A.; Wallace, W.; Rini, B.; Morris-Stiff, G.; Allende, D.; et al. Mediators of Inflammation-Driven Expansion, Trafficking, and Function of Tumor-Infiltrating MDSCs. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2019, 7, 1687–1699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wang, D.; Richmond, A. Nuclear Factor-Kappa B Activation by the CXC Chemokine Melanoma Growth-Stimulatory Activity/Growth-Regulated Protein Involves the MEKK1/P38 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 3650–3659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Bordoni, R.; Thomas, G.; Richmond, A. Growth Factor Modulation of Melanoma Growth Stimulatory Activity mRNA Expression in Human Malignant Melanoma Cells Correlates with Cell Growth. J. Cell. Biochem. 1989, 39, 421–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Taki, M.; Abiko, K.; Baba, T.; Hamanishi, J.; Yamaguchi, K.; Murakami, R.; Yamanoi, K.; Horikawa, N.; Hosoe, Y.; Nakamura, E.; et al. Snail Promotes Ovarian Cancer Progression by Recruiting Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells via CXCR2 Ligand Upregulation. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wang, Y.; Shi, J.; Chai, K.; Ying, X.; Zhou, B. The Role of Snail in EMT and Tumorigenesis. Curr. Cancer Drug Targets 2013, 13, 963–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Han, L.; Korangath, P.; Nguyen, N.; Diehl, A.; Cho, S.; Teo, W.; Cope, L.; Gessler, M.; Romer, L.; Sukumar, S. HEYL Regulates Neoangiogenesis Through Overexpression in Both Breast Tumor Epithelium and Endothelium. Front. Oncol. 2021, 10, 581459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Meurette, O.; Mehlen, P. Notch Signaling in the Tumor Microenvironment. Cancer Cell 2018, 34, 536–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Zhou, Y.; Zheng, X.; Xu, B.; Deng, H.; Chen, L.; Jiang, J. Histone Methyltransferase SETD2 Inhibits Tumor Growth via Suppressing CXCL1-Mediated Activation of Cell Cycle in Lung Adenocarcinoma. Aging 2020, 12, 25189–25206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Al Sarakbi, W.; Sasi, W.; Jiang, W.; Roberts, T.; Newbold, R.; Mokbel, K. The mRNA Expression of SETD2 in Human Breast Cancer: Cor-Relation with Clinico-Pathological Parameters. BMC Cancer 2009, 9, 290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Patil, V.; Pal, J.; Somasundaram, K. Elucidating the Cancer-Specific Genetic Alteration Spectrum of Glioblastoma Derived Cell Lines from Whole Exome and RNA Sequencing. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 43452–43471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Khan, S.; Cameron, S.; Blaschke, M.; Moriconi, F.; Naz, N.; Amanzada, A.; Ramadori, G.; Malik, I. Differential Gene Expression of Chemokines in KRAS and BRAF Mutated Colorectal Cell Lines: Role of Cytokines. World J. Gastroenterol. 2014, 20, 2979–2994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Matsuo, Y.; Campbell, P.; Brekken, R.; Sung, B.; Ouellette, M.; Fleming, J.; Aggarwal, B.; Der, C.; Guha, S. K-Ras Promotes Angiogenesis Mediated by Immortalized Human Pancreatic Epithelial Cells through Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Signaling Pathways. Mol. Cancer Res. 2009, 7, 799–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Purohit, A.; Varney, M.; Rachagani, S.; Ouellette, M.; Batra, S.; Singh, R. CXCR2 Signaling Regulates KRAS(G12D)-Induced Autocrine Growth of Pancreatic Cancer. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 7280–7296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Yoo, Y.; Ueda, H.; Park, K.; Flanders, K.; Lee, Y.; Jay, G.; Kim, S. Regulation of Transforming Growth Factor-Beta 1 Expression by the Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) X Transactivator. Role in HBV Pathogenesis. J. Clin. Investig. 1996, 97, 388–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Nischalke, H.; Berger, C.; Luda, C.; Müller, T.; Berg, T.; Coenen, M.; Krämer, B.; Körner, C.; Trebicka, J.; Grünhage, F.; et al. The CXCL1 Rs4074 A Allele Is Associated with Enhanced CXCL1 Responses to TLR2 Ligands and Predisposes to Cirrhosis in HCV Genotype 1-Infected Caucasian Patients. J. Hepatol. 2012, 56, 758–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Li, H.; Ju, D.; Zhang, D.; Li, H.; Kong, L.; Guo, Y.; Li, C.; Wang, X.; Chen, Z.; Bian, H. Activation of TGF-Β1-CD147 Positive Feedback Loop in Hepatic Stellate Cells Promotes Liver Fibrosis. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 16552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Shi, W.; Ju, D.; Li, H.; Yuan, L.; Cui, J.; Luo, D.; Chen, Z.; Bian, H. CD147 Promotes CXCL1 Expression and Modulates Liver Fibrogenesis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Mustapha, P.; Paris, I.; Garcia, M.; Tran, C.; Cremniter, J.; Garnier, M.; Faure, J.; Barthes, T.; Boneca, I.; Morel, F.; et al. Chemokines and Antimicrobial Peptides Have a Cag-Dependent Early Response to Helicobacter pylori Infection in Primary Human Gastric Epithelial Cells. Infect. Immun. 2014, 82, 2881–2889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Tran, C.; Garcia, M.; Garnier, M.; Burucoa, C.; Bodet, C. Inflammatory Signaling Pathways Induced by Helicobacter pylori in Primary Human Gastric Epithelial Cells. Innate Immun. 2017, 23, 165–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Lane, B.; Liu, J.; Bock, P.; Schols, D.; Coffey, M.; Strieter, R.; Polverini, P.; Markovitz, D. Interleukin-8 and Growth-Regulated Oncogene Alpha Mediate Angiogenesis in Kaposi’s Sarcoma. J. Virol. 2002, 76, 11570–11583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Wang, D.; Wang, H.; Brown, J.; Daikoku, T.; Ning, W.; Shi, Q.; Richmond, A.; Strieter, R.; Dey, S.; DuBois, R. CXCL1 Induced by Prostaglandin E2 Promotes Angiogenesis in Colorectal Cancer. J. Exp. Med. 2006, 203, 941–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Wallace, A.; Sales, K.; Catalano, R.; Anderson, R.; Williams, A.; Wilson, M.; Schwarze, J.; Wang, H.; Rossi, A.; Jabbour, H. Prostaglandin F2alpha-F-Prostanoid Receptor Signaling Promotes Neutrophil Chemotaxis via Chemokine (C-X-C Motif) Ligand 1 in Endometrial Adenocarcinoma. Cancer Res. 2009, 69, 5726–5733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Katoh, H.; Wang, D.; Daikoku, T.; Sun, H.; Dey, S.; Dubois, R. CXCR2-Expressing Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells Are Essential to Promote Colitis-Associated Tumorigenesis. Cancer Cell 2013, 24, 631–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Urosevic, J.; Blasco, M.; Llorente, A.; Bellmunt, A.; Berenguer-Llergo, A.; Guiu, M.; Cañellas, A.; Fernandez, E.; Burkov, I.; Clapés, M.; et al. ERK1/2 Signaling Induces Upregulation of ANGPT2 and CXCR4 to Mediate Liver Metastasis in Colon Cancer. Cancer Res. 2020, 80, 4668–4680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Ueda, S.; Basaki, Y.; Yoshie, M.; Ogawa, K.; Sakisaka, S.; Kuwano, M.; Ono, M. PTEN/Akt Signaling through Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Is Prerequisite for Angiogenesis by Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells That Is Susceptible to Inhibition by Gefitinib. Cancer Res. 2006, 66, 5346–5353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Liu, L.; Sun, H.; Wu, S.; Tan, H.; Sun, Y.; Liu, X.; Si, S.; Xu, L.; Huang, J.; Zhou, W.; et al. IL-17A Promotes CXCR2-Dependent Angiogenesis in a Mouse Model of Liver Cancer. Mol. Med. Rep. 2019, 20, 1065–1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Zou, A.; Lambert, D.; Yeh, H.; Yasukawa, K.; Behbod, F.; Fan, F.; Cheng, N. Elevated CXCL1 Expression in Breast Cancer Stroma Predicts Poor Prognosis and Is Inversely Associated with Expression of TGF-β Signaling Proteins. BMC Cancer 2014, 14, 781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ogawa, R.; Yamamoto, T.; Hirai, H.; Hanada, K.; Kiyasu, Y.; Nishikawa, G.; Mizuno, R.; Inamoto, S.; Itatani, Y.; Sakai, Y.; et al. Loss of SMAD4 Promotes Colorectal Cancer Progression by Recruiting Tumor-Associated Neutrophils via the CXCL1/8-CXCR2 Axis. Clin. Cancer Res. 2019, 25, 2887–2899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Li, X.; Sterling, J.; Fan, K.; Vessella, R.; Shyr, Y.; Hayward, S.; Matrisian, L.; Bhowmick, N. Loss of TGF-β Responsiveness in Prostate Stromal Cells Alters Chemokine Levels and Facilitates the Development of Mixed Osteoblastic/Osteolytic Bone Lesions. Mol. Cancer Res. 2012, 10, 494–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Lv, Q.; Zou, H.; Xu, Y.; Shao, Z.; Wu, R.; Li, K.; Deng, X.; Gu, D.; Jiang, H.; Su, M.; et al. Expression Levels of Chemokine (C-X-C Motif) Ligands CXCL1 and CXCL3 as Prognostic Biomarkers in Rectal Adenocarcinoma: Evidence from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) Analyses. Bioengineered 2021, 12, 3711–3725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Liu, C.; Jing, X.; Liu, X.; Qin, S.; Liu, M.; Hou, C. Tumor-Suppressor miRNA-27b-5p Regulates the Growth and Metastatic Behaviors of Ovarian Carcinoma Cells by Targeting CXCL1. J. Ovarian Res. 2020, 13, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Lv, M.; Xu, Y.; Tang, R.; Ren, J.; Shen, S.; Chen, Y.; Liu, B.; Hou, Y.; Wang, T. miR141-CXCL1-CXCR2 Signaling-Induced Treg Recruitment Regulates Metastases and Survival of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2014, 13, 3152–3162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Zhuang, W.; Niu, T.; Li, Z. MicroRNA miR-145-5p Regulates Cell Proliferation and Cell Migration in Colon Cancer by Inhibiting Chemokine (C-X-C Motif) Ligand 1 and Integrin A2. Bioengineered 2021, 12, 9909–9917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Cui, X.; Li, Z.; Gao, J.; Gao, P.; Ni, Y.; Zhu, J. Elevated CXCL1 Increases Hepatocellular Carcinoma Aggressiveness and Is Inhibited by miRNA-200a. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 65052–65066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  77. Wang, D.; Sun, H.; Wei, J.; Cen, B.; DuBois, R.N. CXCL1 Is Critical for Premetastatic Niche Formation and Metastasis in Colorectal Cancer. Cancer Res. 2017, 77, 3655–3665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Chen, B.; Song, L.; Nie, X.; Lin, F.; Yu, Z.; Kong, W.; Qi, X.; Wang, W. CXCL1 Regulated by miR-302e Is Involved in Cell Viability and Motility of Colorectal Cancer via Inhibiting JAK-STAT Signaling Pathway. Front. Oncol. 2021, 10, 577229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Dewhirst, M.; Braun, R.; Lanzen, J. Temporal Changes in PO2 of R3230AC Tumors in Fischer-344 Rats. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 1998, 42, 723–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Brurberg, K.; Graff, B.; Olsen, D.; Rofstad, E. Tumor-Line Specific pO2 Fluctuations in Human Melanoma Xenografts. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2004, 58, 403–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Ye, L.; Chen, W.; Bai, X.; Xu, X.; Zhang, Q.; Xia, X.; Sun, X.; Li, G.; Hu, Q.; Fu, Q.; et al. Hypoxia-Induced Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Induces an Immunosuppressive Tumor Microenvironment to Promote Metastasis. Cancer Res. 2016, 76, 818–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Plotkin, B.; Sigar, I.; Swartzendruber, J.; Kaminski, A.; Davis, J. Differential Expression of Cytokines and Receptor Expression during Anoxic Growth. BMC Res. Notes 2018, 11, 406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Olbryt, M.; Habryka, A.; Student, S.; Jarząb, M.; Tyszkiewicz, T.; Lisowska, K. Global Gene Expression Profiling in Three Tumor Cell Lines Subjected to Experimental Cycling and Chronic Hypoxia. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e105104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Huang, G.; Tao, L.; Shen, S.; Chen, L. Hypoxia Induced CCL28 Promotes Angiogenesis in Lung Adenocarcinoma by Targeting CCR3 on Endothelial Cells. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 27152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Sharma, M.; Astekar, M.; Soi, S.; Manjunatha, B.; Shetty, D.; Radhakrishnan, R. pH Gradient Reversal: An Emerging Hallmark of Cancers. Recent Pat. Anticancer Drug Discov. 2015, 10, 244–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Avnet, S.; Di Pompo, G.; Chano, T.; Errani, C.; Ibrahim-Hashim, A.; Gillies, R.; Donati, D.; Baldini, N. Cancer-Associated Mesenchymal Stroma Fosters the Stemness of Osteosarcoma Cells in Response to Intratumoral Acidosis via NF-κB Activation. Int. J. Cancer 2017, 140, 1331–1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Zheng, M.; Jones, D.; Horzempa, C.; Prasad, A.; McKeown-Longo, P. The First Type III Domain of Fibronectin Is Associated with the Expression of Cytokines within the Lung Tumor Microenvironment. J. Cancer 2011, 2, 478–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Addison, C.; Belperio, J.; Burdick, M.; Strieter, R. Overexpression of the Duffy Antigen Receptor for Chemokines (DARC) by NSCLC Tumor Cells Results in Increased Tumor Necrosis. BMC Cancer 2004, 4, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Cullen, S.; Henry, C.; Kearney, C.; Logue, S.; Feoktistova, M.; Tynan, G.; Lavelle, E.; Leverkus, M.; Martin, S. Fas/CD95-Induced Chemokines Can Serve as “Find-Me” Signals for Apoptotic Cells. Mol. Cell 2013, 49, 1034–1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Seifert, L.; Werba, G.; Tiwari, S.; Ly, N.G.; Alothman, S.; Alqunaibit, D.; Avanzi, A.; Barilla, R.; Daley, D.; Greco, S.; et al. The Necrosome Promotes Pancreatic Oncogenesis via CXCL1 and Mincle-Induced Immune Suppression. Nature 2016, 532, 245–249, Erratum in Nature 2021, 591, E28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Zhu, K.; Liang, W.; Ma, Z.; Xu, D.; Cao, S.; Lu, X.; Liu, N.; Shan, B.; Qian, L.; Yuan, J. Necroptosis Promotes Cell-Autonomous Activation of Proinflammatory Cytokine Gene Expression. Cell Death Dis. 2018, 9, 500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Taxman, D.; MacKeigan, J.; Clements, C.; Bergstralh, D.; Ting, J. Transcriptional Profiling of Targets for Combination Therapy of Lung Carcinoma with Paclitaxel and Mitogen-Activated Protein/Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase Kinase Inhibitor. Cancer Res. 2003, 63, 5095–5104. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  93. Wang, P.; Song, D.; Wan, D.; Li, L.; Mei, W.; Li, X.; Han, L.; Zhu, X.; Yang, L.; Cai, Y.; et al. Ginsenoside Panaxatriol Reverses TNBC Paclitaxel Resistance by Inhibiting the IRAK1/NF-κB and ERK Pathways. PeerJ. 2020, 8, e9281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Wilson, C.; Purcell, C.; Seaton, A.; Oladipo, O.; Maxwell, P.; O’Sullivan, J.; Wilson, R.; Johnston, P.; Waugh, D. Chemotherapy-Induced CXC-Chemokine/CXC-Chemokine Receptor Signaling in Metastatic Prostate Cancer Cells Confers Resistance to Oxaliplatin through Potentiation of Nuclear Factor-kappaB Transcription and Evasion of Apoptosis. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2008, 327, 746–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Ruiz de Porras, V.; Bystrup, S.; Martínez-Cardús, A.; Pluvinet, R.; Sumoy, L.; Howells, L.; James, M.; Iwuji, C.; Manzano, J.; Layos, L.; et al. Curcumin Mediates Oxaliplatin-Acquired Resistance Reversion in Colorectal Cancer Cell Lines through Modulation of CXC-Chemokine/NF-κB Signalling Pathway. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 24675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Chen, L.; Pan, X.; Huang, H.; Gao, Y.; Yang, Q.; Wang, L.; Cui, X.; Xu, D. Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition Induced by GRO-α-CXCR2 Promotes Bladder Cancer Recurrence after Intravesical Chemotherapy. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 45274–45285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Li, Y.; Liu, Z.; Wang, J.; Yu, J.; Li, Z.; Yang, H.; Tang, J.; Chen, Z. Receptor-Interacting Protein Kinase 3 Deficiency Recruits Mye-Loid-Derived Suppressor Cells to Hepatocellular Carcinoma Through the Chemokine (C-X-C Motif) Ligand 1-Chemokine (C-X-C Motif) Receptor 2 Axis. Hepatology 2019, 70, 1564–1581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Miyake, M.; Furuya, H.; Onishi, S.; Hokutan, K.; Anai, S.; Chan, O.; Shi, S.; Fujimoto, K.; Goodison, S.; Cai, W.; et al. Monoclonal Antibody against CXCL1 (HL2401) as a Novel Agent in Suppressing IL6 Expression and Tumoral Growth. Theranostics 2019, 9, 853–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Li, A.; Varney, M.; Singh, R. Constitutive Expression of Growth Regulated Oncogene (Gro) in Human Colon Carcinoma Cells with Different Metastatic Potential and Its Role in Regulating Their Metastatic Phenotype. Clin. Exp. Metastasis 2004, 21, 571–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Wei, Z.; Xia, G.; Wu, Y.; Chen, W.; Xiang, Z.; Schwarz, R.; Brekken, R.; Awasthi, N.; He, Y.; Zhang, C. CXCL1 Promotes Tumor Growth through VEGF Pathway Activation and Is Associated with Inferior Survival in Gastric Cancer. Cancer Lett. 2015, 359, 335–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Chen, X.; Jin, R.; Chen, R.; Huang, Z. Complementary Action of CXCL1 and CXCL8 in Pathogenesis of Gastric Carcinoma. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2018, 11, 1036–1045. [Google Scholar]
  102. Han, D.; Zhang, N.; Zhao, S.; Liu, H.; Wang, X.; Yang, M.; Wang, S.; Li, Y.; Liu, Z.; Teng, L. AKIP1 Promotes Glioblastoma Viability, Mobility and Chemoradiation Resistance via Regulating CXCL1 and CXCL8 Mediated NF-κB and AKT Pathways. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2021, 11, 1185–1205. [Google Scholar]
  103. Duckworth, C.; Zhang, L.; Carroll, S.; Ethier, S.; Cheung, H. Overexpression of GAB2 in Ovarian Cancer Cells Promotes Tumor Growth and Angiogenesis by Upregulating Chemokine Expression. Oncogene 2016, 35, 4036–4047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Yamamoto, Y.; Sugimoto, A.; Maruo, K.; Tsujio, G.; Sera, T.; Kushiyama, S.; Nishimura, S.; Kuroda, K.; Togano, S.; Eguchi, S.; et al. CXCR2 Signaling Might Have a Tumor-Suppressive Role in Patients with Cholangiocarcinoma. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0266027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Bolitho, C.; Hahn, M.; Baxter, R.; Marsh, D. The Chemokine CXCL1 Induces Proliferation in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Cells by Transac-Tivation of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor. Endocr. Relat. Cancer 2010, 17, 929–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Lee, C.; Syu, S.; Liu, K.; Chu, P.; Yang, W.; Lin, P.; Shieh, W. Interleukin-1 Beta Transactivates Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor via the CXCL1-CXCR2 Axis in Oral Cancer. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 38866–38880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Yang, G.; Rosen, D.; Liu, G.; Yang, F.; Guo, X.; Xiao, X.; Xue, F.; Mercado-Uribe, I.; Huang, J.; Lin, S.; et al. CXCR2 Promotes Ovarian Cancer Growth through Dysregulated Cell Cycle, Diminished Apoptosis, and Enhanced Angiogenesis. Clin. Cancer Res. 2010, 16, 3875–3886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Ignacio, R.; Dong, Y.; Kabir, S.; Choi, H.; Lee, E.; Wilson, A.; Beeghly-Fadiel, A.; Whalen, M.; Son, D. CXCR2 Is a Negative Regulator of P21 in P53-Dependent and Independent Manner via Akt-Mediated Mdm2 in Ovarian Cancer. Oncotarget 2018, 9, 9751–9765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  109. Xu, H.; Lin, F.; Wang, Z.; Yang, L.; Meng, J.; Ou, Z.; Shao, Z.; Di, G.; Yang, G. CXCR2 Promotes Breast Cancer Metastasis and Chemoresistance via Suppression of AKT1 and Activation of COX2. Cancer Lett. 2018, 412, 69–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Park, G.; Pathak, H.; Godwin, A.; Kwon, Y. Epithelial-Stromal Communication via CXCL1-CXCR2 Interaction Stimulates Growth of Ovarian Cancer Cells through P38 Activation. Cell. Oncol. 2021, 44, 77–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Zhuo, C.; Wu, X.; Li, J.; Hu, D.; Jian, J.; Chen, C.; Zheng, X.; Yang, C. Chemokine (C-X-C Motif) Ligand 1 Is Associated with Tumor Progression and Poor Prognosis in Patients with Colorectal Cancer. Biosci. Rep. 2018, 38, BSR20180580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Steensma, D.; Bejar, R.; Jaiswal, S.; Lindsley, R.; Sekeres, M.; Hasserjian, R.; Ebert, B. Clonal Hematopoiesis of Indeterminate Potential and Its Distinction from Myelodysplastic Syndromes. Blood 2015, 126, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Lesina, M.; Wörmann, S.; Morton, J.; Diakopoulos, K.; Korneeva, O.; Wimmer, M.; Einwächter, H.; Sperveslage, J.; Demir, I.; Kehl, T.; et al. RelA Regulates CXCL1/CXCR2-Dependent Onco-Gene-Induced Senescence in Murine Kras-Driven Pancreatic Carcinogenesis. J. Clin. Investig. 2016, 126, 2919–2932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Hishida, T.; Vazquez-Ferrer, E.; Hishida-Nozaki, Y.; Sancho-Martinez, I.; Takahashi, Y.; Hatanaka, F.; Wu, J.; Ocampo, A.; Reddy, P.; Wu, M.; et al. Mutations in Foregut SOX2+ Cells Induce Efficient Proliferation via CXCR2 Pathway. Protein Cell 2019, 10, 485–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Guo, H.; Liu, Z.; Xu, B.; Hu, H.; Wei, Z.; Liu, Q.; Zhang, X.; Ding, X.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, M.; et al. Chemokine Receptor CXCR2 Is Trans-Activated by P53 and Induces P38-Mediated Cellular Senescence in Response to DNA Damage. Aging Cell 2013, 12, 1110–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Acosta, J.; O’Loghlen, A.; Banito, A.; Guijarro, M.; Augert, A.; Raguz, S.; Fumagalli, M.; Da Costa, M.; Brown, C.; Popov, N.; et al. Chemokine Signaling via the CXCR2 Receptor Reinforces Senescence. Cell 2008, 133, 1006–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Kang, T.; Yevsa, T.; Woller, N.; Hoenicke, L.; Wuestefeld, T.; Dauch, D.; Hohmeyer, A.; Gereke, M.; Rudalska, R.; Potapova, A.; et al. Senescence Surveillance of Pre-Malignant Hepatocytes Limits Liver Cancer Development. Nature 2011, 479, 547–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Chien, Y.; Scuoppo, C.; Wang, X.; Fang, X.; Balgley, B.; Bolden, J.; Premsrirut, P.; Luo, W.; Chicas, A.; Lee, C.; et al. Control of the Senescence-Associated Secretory Phenotype by NF-κB Promotes Senescence and Enhances Chemosensitivity. Genes Dev. 2011, 25, 2125–2136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Benelli, R.; Stigliani, S.; Minghelli, S.; Carlone, S.; Ferrari, N. Impact of CXCL1 Overexpression on Growth and Invasion of Prostate Cancer Cell. Prostate 2013, 73, 941–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Cai, L.; Xu, S.; Piao, C.; Qiu, S.; Li, H.; Du, J. Adiponectin Induces CXCL1 Secretion from Cancer Cells and Promotes Tumor Angiogenesis by Inducing Stromal Fibroblast Senescence. Mol. Carcinog. 2016, 55, 1796–1806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Yang, G.; Rosen, D.; Zhang, Z.; Bast, R.J.; Mills, G.; Colacino, J.; Mercado-Uribe, I.; Liu, J. The Chemokine Growth-Regulated Oncogene 1 (Gro-1) Links RAS Signaling to the Senescence of Stromal Fibroblasts and Ovarian Tumorigenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 16472–16477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Vinay, D.; Ryan, E.; Pawelec, G.; Talib, W.; Stagg, J.; Elkord, E.; Lichtor, T.; Decker, W.; Whelan, R.; Kumara, H.; et al. Immune Evasion in Cancer: Mechanistic Basis and Therapeutic Strategies. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2015, 35, S185–S198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Nassar, D.; Blanpain, C. Cancer Stem Cells: Basic Concepts and Therapeutic Implications. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 2016, 11, 47–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Wolf, B.; Krieg, K.; Falk, C.; Breuhahn, K.; Keppeler, H.; Biedermann, T.; Schmid, E.; Warmann, S.; Fuchs, J.; Vetter, S.; et al. Inducing Differentiation of Premalignant Hepatic Cells as a Novel Therapeutic Strategy in Hepatocarcinoma. Cancer Res. 2016, 76, 5550–5561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Agarwal, P.; Li, H.; Choi, K.; Hueneman, K.; He, J.; Welner, R.; Starczynowski, D.; Bhatia, R. TNF-α-Induced Alterations in Stromal Progenitors Enhance Leukemic Stem Cell Growth via CXCR2 Signaling. Cell Rep. 2021, 36, 109386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Wang, Y.; Tu, L.; Du, C.; Xie, X.; Liu, Y.; Wang, J.; Li, Z.; Jiang, M.; Cao, D.; Yan, X.; et al. CXCR2 Is a Novel Cancer Stem-like Cell Marker for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. OncoTargets Ther. 2018, 11, 5559–5567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Ciummo, S.; D’Antonio, L.; Sorrentino, C.; Fieni, C.; Lanuti, P.; Stassi, G.; Todaro, M.; Di Carlo, E. The C-X-C Motif Chemokine Ligand 1 Sustains Breast Cancer Stem Cell Self-Renewal and Promotes Tumor Progression and Immune Escape Programs. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021, 9, 689286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Bajetto, A.; Pattarozzi, A.; Corsaro, A.; Barbieri, F.; Daga, A.; Bosio, A.; Gatti, M.; Pisaturo, V.; Sirito, R.; Florio, T. Different Effects of Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells on Glioblastoma Stem Cells by Direct Cell Interaction or Via Released Soluble Factors. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2017, 11, 312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Hsu, Y.; Chen, Y.; Chang, W.; Jian, S.; Fan, H.; Wang, J.; Kuo, P. Interaction between Tumor-Associated Dendritic Cells and Colon Cancer Cells Contributes to Tumor Progression via CXCL1. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 2427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Liotti, F.; Collina, F.; Pone, E.; La Sala, L.; Franco, R.; Prevete, N.; Melillo, R. Interleukin-8, but Not the Related Chemokine CXCL1, Sustains an Autocrine Circuit Necessary for the Properties and Functions of Thyroid Cancer Stem Cells. Stem Cells 2017, 35, 135–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Tang, K.; Ma, S.; Lee, T.; Chan, Y.; Kwan, P.; Tong, C.; Ng, I.; Man, K.; To, K.; Lai, P.; et al. CD133+ Liver Tumor-Initiating Cells Promote Tumor Angiogenesis, Growth, and Self-Renewal through Neurotensin/Interleukin-8/CXCL1 Signaling. Hepatology 2012, 55, 807–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Li, L.; Li, J.; Yang, H.; Zhang, X.; Liu, L.; Li, Y.; Zeng, T.; Zhu, Y.; Li, X.; Li, Y.; et al. Expansion of Cancer Stem Cell Pool Initiates Lung Cancer Recurrence before Angiogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, E8948–E8957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Strieter, R.; Polverini, P.; Kunkel, S.; Arenberg, D.; Burdick, M.; Kasper, J.; Dzuiba, J.; Van Damme, J.; Walz, A.; Marriott, D. The Functional Role of the ELR Motif in CXC Chemokine-Mediated Angiogenesis. J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270, 27348–27357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Lowman, H.; Slagle, P.; DeForge, L.; Wirth, C.; Gillece-Castro, B.; Bourell, J.; Fairbrother, W. Exchanging Interleukin-8 and Melanoma Growth-Stimulating Activity Receptor Binding Specificities. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 14344–14352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Addison, C.; Daniel, T.; Burdick, M.; Liu, H.; Ehlert, J.; Xue, Y.; Buechi, L.; Walz, A.; Richmond, A.; Strieter, R. The CXC Chemokine Receptor 2, CXCR2, Is the Putative Receptor for ELR+ CXC Chemokine-Induced Angiogenic Activity. J. Immunol. 2000, 165, 5269–5277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Romagnani, P.; Annunziato, F.; Lasagni, L.; Lazzeri, E.; Beltrame, C.; Francalanci, M.; Uguccioni, M.; Galli, G.; Cosmi, L.; Maurenzig, L.; et al. Cell Cycle-Dependent Expression of CXC Chemokine Receptor 3 by Endothelial Cells Mediates angiostatic Activity. J. Clin. Investig. 2001, 107, 53–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Mirshahi, F.; Pourtau, J.; Li, H.; Muraine, M.; Trochon, V.; Legrand, E.; Vannier, J.; Soria, J.; Vasse, M.; Soria, C. SDF-1 Activity on Microvascular Endothelial Cells: Consequences on Angiogenesis in in Vitro and in Vivo Models. Thromb. Res. 2000, 99, 587–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Miyake, M.; Goodison, S.; Urquidi, V.; Gomes Giacoia, E.; Rosser, C. Expression of CXCL1 in Human Endothelial Cells Induces Angiogenesis through the CXCR2 Receptor and the ERK1/2 and EGF Pathways. Lab. Investig. 2013, 93, 768–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Ma, C.; Liu, G.; Liu, W.; Xu, W.; Li, H.; Piao, S.; Sui, Y.; Feng, W. CXCL1 Stimulates Decidual Angiogenesis via the VEGF-A Pathway during the First Trimester of Pregnancy. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2021, 476, 2989–2998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Owen, J.; Strieter, R.; Burdick, M.; Haghnegahdar, H.; Nanney, L.; Shattuck-Brandt, R.; Richmond, A. Enhanced Tumor-Forming Capacity for Immortalized Melanocytes Expressing Melanoma Growth Stimulatory Activity/Growth-Regulated Cytokine Beta and Gamma Proteins. Int. J. Cancer 1997, 73, 94–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Keane, M.; Belperio, J.; Xue, Y.; Burdick, M.; Strieter, R. Depletion of CXCR2 Inhibits Tumor Growth and Angiogenesis in a Murine Model of Lung Cancer. J. Immunol. 2004, 172, 2853–2860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Mestas, J.; Burdick, M.; Reckamp, K.; Pantuck, A.; Figlin, R.; Strieter, R. The Role of CXCR2/CXCR2 Ligand Biological Axis in Renal Cell Carcinoma. J. Immunol. 2005, 175, 5351–5357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Nör, J.; Christensen, J.; Mooney, D.; Polverini, P. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF)-Mediated Angiogenesis Is Associated with Enhanced Endothelial Cell Survival and Induction of Bcl-2 Expression. Am. J. Pathol. 1999, 154, 375–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Karl, E.; Warner, K.; Zeitlin, B.; Kaneko, T.; Wurtzel, L.; Jin, T.; Chang, J.; Wang, S.; Wang, C.; Strieter, R.; et al. Bcl-2 Acts in a Proangiogenic Signaling Pathway through Nuclear Factor-kappaB and CXC Chemokines. Cancer Res. 2005, 65, 5063–5069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Warner, K.; Miyazawa, M.; Cordeiro, M.; Love, W.; Pinsky, M.; Neiva, K.; Spalding, A.; Nör, J. Endothelial Cells Enhance Tumor Cell Invasion through a Crosstalk Mediated by CXC Chemokine Signaling. Neoplasia 2008, 10, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Kaneko, T.; Zhang, Z.; Mantellini, M.; Karl, E.; Zeitlin, B.; Verhaegen, M.; Soengas, M.; Lingen, M.; Strieter, R.; Nunez, G.; et al. Bcl-2 or-Chestrates a Cross-Talk between Endothelial and Tumor Cells That Promotes Tumor Growth. Cancer Res. 2007, 67, 9685–9693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Ruiz de Porras, V.; Wang, X.; Palomero, L.; Marin-Aguilera, M.; Solé-Blanch, C.; Indacochea, A.; Jimenez, N.; Bystrup, S.; Bakht, M.; Conteduca, V.; et al. Tax-Ane-Induced Attenuaticaon of the CXCR2/BCL-2 Axis Sensitizes Prostate Cancer to Platinum-Based Treatment. Eur. Urol. 2021, 79, 722–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Karl, E.; Zhang, Z.; Dong, Z.; Neiva, K.; Soengas, M.; Koch, A.; Polverini, P.; Núñez, G.; Nör, J. Unidirectional Crosstalk between Bcl-xL and Bcl-2 Enhances the Angiogenic Phenotype of Endothelial Cells. Cell Death Differ. 2007, 14, 1657–1666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Huang, Z.; Zhang, M.; Chen, G.; Wang, W.; Zhang, P.; Yue, Y.; Guan, Z.; Wang, X.; Fan, J. Bladder Cancer Cells Interact with Vascular Endothelial Cells Triggering EGFR Signals to Promote Tumor Progression. Int. J. Oncol. 2019, 54, 1555–1566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Moscova, M.; Marsh, D.; Baxter, R. Protein Chip Discovery of Secreted Proteins Regulated by the Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase Pathway in Ovarian Cancer Cell Lines. Cancer Res. 2006, 66, 1376–1383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  151. Fimmel, S.; Devermann, L.; Herrmann, A.; Zouboulis, C. GRO-Alpha: A Potential Marker for Cancer and Aging Silenced by RNA Interference. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2007, 1119, 176–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Schraufstatter, I.; Trieu, K.; Zhao, M.; Rose, D.; Terkeltaub, R.; Burger, M. IL-8-Mediated Cell Migration in Endothelial Cells Depends on Cathepsin B Activity and Transactivation of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor. J. Immunol. 2003, 171, 6714–6722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Li, A.; Cheng, X.; Moro, A.; Singh, R.; Hines, O.; Eibl, G. CXCR2-Dependent Endothelial Progenitor Cell Mobilization in Pancreatic Cancer Growth. Transl. Oncol. 2011, 4, 20–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Kanzler, I.; Tuchscheerer, N.; Steffens, G.; Simsekyilmaz, S.; Konschalla, S.; Kroh, A.; Simons, D.; Asare, Y.; Schober, A.; Bucala, R.; et al. Differential Roles of Angiogenic Chemokines in Endothelial Progenitor Cell-Induced Angiogenesis. Basic Res. Cardiol. 2013, 108, 310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Fang, J.; Chen, X.; Wang, S.; Xie, T.; Du, X.; Liu, H.; Wang, S.; Li, X.; Chen, J.; Zhang, B.; et al. The Expression of P2X7 Receptors in EPCs and Their Potential Role in the Targeting of EPCs to Brain Gliomas. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2015, 16, 498–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Angara, K.; Borin, T.; Rashid, M.; Lebedyeva, I.; Ara, R.; Lin, P.; Iskander, A.; Bollag, R.; Achyut, B.; Arbab, A. CXCR2-Expressing Tumor Cells Drive Vascular Mimicry in Antiangiogenic Therapy-Resistant Glioblastoma. Neoplasia 2018, 20, 1070–1082, Erratum in Neoplasia 2019, 21, 156–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Scapini, P.; Morini, M.; Tecchio, C.; Minghelli, S.; Di Carlo, E.; Tanghetti, E.; Albini, A.; Lowell, C.; Berton, G.; Noonan, D.; et al. CXCL1/Macrophage Inflammatory Protein-2-Induced Angiogenesis in Vivo Is Mediated by Neutrophil-Derived Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-A. J. Immunol. 2004, 172, 5034–5040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Kusumanto, Y.; Dam, W.; Hospers, G.; Meijer, C.; Mulder, N. Platelets and Granulocytes, in Particular the Neutrophils, Form Important Compartments for Circulating Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor. Angiogenesis 2003, 6, 283–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Nozawa, H.; Chiu, C.; Hanahan, D. Infiltrating Neutrophils Mediate the Initial Angiogenic Switch in a Mouse Model of Multistage Car-Cinogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 12493–12498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Ardi, V.; Kupriyanova, T.; Deryugina, E.; Quigley, J. Human Neutrophils Uniquely Release TIMP-Free MMP-9 to Provide a Potent Catalytic Stimulator of Angiogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 20262–20267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Deryugina, E.; Zajac, E.; Juncker-Jensen, A.; Kupriyanova, T.; Welter, L.; Quigley, J. Tissue-Infiltrating Neutrophils Constitute the Major in Vivo Source of Angiogenesis-Inducing MMP-9 in the Tumor Microenvironment. Neoplasia 2014, 16, 771–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Hawinkels, L.; Zuidwijk, K.; Verspaget, H.; de Jonge-Muller, E.; van Duijn, W.; Ferreira, V.; Fontijn, R.; David, G.; Hommes, D.; Lamers, C.; et al. VEGF Release by MMP-9 Mediated Heparan Sulphate Cleavage Induces Colorectal Cancer Angiogenesis. Eur. J. Cancer 2008, 44, 1904–1913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Bausch, D.; Pausch, T.; Krauss, T.; Hopt, U.; Fernandez-del-Castillo, C.; Warshaw, A.; Thayer, S.; Keck, T. Neutrophil Granulocyte Derived MMP-9 Is a VEGF Independent Functional Component of the Angiogenic Switch in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Angiogenesis 2011, 14, 235–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Cui, N.; Hu, M.; Khalil, R. Biochemical and Biological Attributes of Matrix Metalloproteinases. Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl. Sci. 2017, 147, 1–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Queen, M.; Ryan, R.; Holzer, R.; Keller-Peck, C.; Jorcyk, C. Breast Cancer Cells Stimulate Neutrophils to Produce Oncostatin M: Potential Implications for Tumor Progression. Cancer Res. 2005, 65, 8896–8904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Shojaei, F.; Singh, M.; Thompson, J.; Ferrara, N. Role of Bv8 in Neutrophil-Dependent Angiogenesis in a Transgenic Model of Cancer pro-Gression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 2640–2645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Zhang, Z.; Pan, J.; Li, L.; Han, B.; Xiao, W. Altered Phenotype of Lymphatic Endothelial Cells Induced by Highly Metastatic OTSCC Cells Contributed to the Lymphatic Metastasis of OTSCC Cells. Cancer Sci. 2010, 101, 686–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Xu, J.; Zhang, C.; He, Y.; Wu, H.; Wang, Z.; Song, W.; Li, W.; He, W.; Cai, S.; Zhan, W. Lymphatic Endothelial Cell-Secreted CXCL1 Stimulates Lymphangiogenesis and Metastasis of Gastric Cancer. Int. J. Cancer 2012, 130, 787–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Oliveira-Ferrer, L.; Milde-Langosch, K.; Eylmann, K.; Rossberg, M.; Müller, V.; Schmalfeldt, B.; Witzel, I.; Wellbrock, J.; Fiedler, W. Mechanisms of Tumor-Lymphatic Interactions in Invasive Breast and Prostate Carcinoma. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Wang, Z.; Wang, Z.; Li, G.; Wu, H.; Sun, K.; Chen, J.; Feng, Y.; Chen, C.; Cai, S.; Xu, J.; et al. CXCL1 from Tumor-Associated Lymphatic Endothelial Cells Drives Gastric Cancer Cell into Lymphatic System via Activating Integrin Β1/FAK/AKT Signaling. Cancer Lett. 2017, 385, 28–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Zhou, X.; Fang, D.; Liu, H.; Ou, X.; Zhang, C.; Zhao, Z.; Zhao, S.; Peng, J.; Cai, S.; He, Y.; et al. PMN-MDSCs Accumulation Induced by CXCL1 Promotes CD8+ T Cells Exhaustion in Gastric Cancer. Cancer Lett. 2022, 532, 215598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Michielsen, A.; Hogan, A.; Marry, J.; Tosetto, M.; Cox, F.; Hyland, J.; Sheahan, K.; O’Donoghue, D.; Mulcahy, H.; Ryan, E.; et al. Tumour Tissue Microenvironment Can Inhibit Dendritic Cell Maturation in Colorectal Cancer. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e27944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Wu, Q.; Li, B.; Li, Z.; Li, J.; Sun, S.; Sun, S. Cancer-Associated Adipocytes: Key Players in Breast Cancer Progression. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2019, 12, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Zhou, C.; He, X.; Tong, C.; Li, H.; Xie, C.; Wu, Y.; Wang, L.; Yan, X.; Luo, D.; Tang, Y.; et al. Cancer-Associated Adipocytes Promote the Invasion and Metastasis in Breast Cancer through LIF/CXCLs Positive Feedback Loop. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2022, 18, 1363–1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Begley, L.; Kasina, S.; MacDonald, J.; Macoska, J. The Inflammatory Microenvironment of the Aging Prostate Facilitates Cellular Pro-Liferation and Hypertrophy. Cytokine 2008, 43, 194–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Awaji, M.; Saxena, S.; Wu, L.; Prajapati, D.; Purohit, A.; Varney, M.; Kumar, S.; Rachagani, S.; Ly, Q.; Jain, M.; et al. CXCR2 Signaling Promotes Secretory Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. FASEB J. 2020, 34, 9405–9418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Kemp, S.; Carpenter, E.; Steele, N.; Donahue, K.; Nwosu, Z.; Pacheco, A.; Velez-Delgado, A.; Menjivar, R.; Lima, F.; The, S.; et al. Apolipoprotein E Promotes Immune Sup-Pression in Pancreatic Cancer through NF-κB-Mediated Production of CXCL1. Cancer Res. 2021, 81, 4305–4318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  178. Erez, N.; Glanz, S.; Raz, Y.; Avivi, C.; Barshack, I. Cancer Associated Fibroblasts Express Pro-Inflammatory Factors in Human Breast and Ovarian Tumors. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2013, 437, 397–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  179. Rudisch, A.; Dewhurst, M.; Horga, L.; Kramer, N.; Harrer, N.; Dong, M.; van der Kuip, H.; Wernitznig, A.; Bernthaler, A.; Dolznig, H.; et al. High EMT Signature Score of Invasive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Cells Correlates with NFκB Driven Colony-Stimulating Factor 2 (CSF2/GM-CSF) Secretion by Neighboring Stromal Fibroblasts. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0124283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Zhang, T.; Tseng, C.; Zhang, Y.; Sirin, O.; Corn, P.; Li-Ning-Tapia, E.; Troncoso, P.; Davis, J.; Pettaway, C.; Ward, J.; et al. CXCL1 Mediates Obesity-Associated Adipose Stromal Cell Trafficking and Function in the Tumour Microenvironment. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 11674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Kasashima, H.; Yashiro, M.; Nakamae, H.; Kitayama, K.; Masuda, G.; Kinoshita, H.; Fukuoka, T.; Hasegawa, T.; Nakane, T.; Hino, M.; et al. CXCL1-Chemokine (C-X-C Motif) Receptor 2 Signaling Stimulates the Recruitment of Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Cells into Diffuse-Type Gastric Cancer Stroma. Am. J. Pathol. 2016, 186, 3028–3039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Miyake, M.; Hori, S.; Morizawa, Y.; Tatsumi, Y.; Nakai, Y.; Anai, S.; Torimoto, K.; Aoki, K.; Tanaka, N.; Shimada, K.; et al. CXCL1-Mediated Interaction of Cancer Cells with Tumor-Associated Macrophages and Can-Cer-Associated Fibroblasts Promotes Tumor Progression in Human Bladder Cancer. Neoplasia 2016, 18, 636–646, Erratum in Neoplasia 2017, 19, 250–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  183. Tang, H.; Zhou, X.; Zhao, X.; Luo, X.; Luo, T.; Chen, Y.; Liang, W.; Jiang, E.; Liu, K.; Shao, Z.; et al. HSP90/IKK-Rich Small Extracellular Vesicles Activate pro-Angiogenic Melanoma-Associated Fibroblasts via the NF-κB/CXCL1 Axis. Cancer Sci. 2022, 113, 1168–1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Sano, M.; Ijichi, H.; Takahashi, R.; Miyabayashi, K.; Fujiwara, H.; Yamada, T.; Kato, H.; Nakatsuka, T.; Tanaka, Y.; Tateishi, K.; et al. Blocking CXCLs-CXCR2 Axis in Tumor-Stromal Interactions Contributes to Survival in a Mouse Model of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma through Reduced Cell Invasion/Migration and a Shift of Immune-Inflammatory Microenvironment. Oncogenesis 2019, 8, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Lu, Y.; Dong, B.; Xu, F.; Xu, Y.; Pan, J.; Song, J.; Zhang, J.; Huang, Y.; Xue, W. CXCL1-LCN2 Paracrine Axis Promotes Progression of Prostate Cancer via the Src Activation and Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition. Cell Commun. Signal. 2019, 17, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Zhang, H.; Yue, J.; Jiang, Z.; Zhou, R.; Xie, R.; Xu, Y.; Wu, S. CAF-Secreted CXCL1 Conferred Radioresistance by Regulating DNA Damage Response in a ROS-Dependent Manner in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Cell Death Dis. 2017, 8, e2790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Kim, E.; Moon, S.; Kim, D.; Zhang, X.; Kim, J. CXCL1 Induces Senescence of Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts via Autocrine Loops in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0188847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Szabo, P.; Valach, J.; Smetana, K.J.; Dvořánková, B. Comparative Analysis of IL-8 and CXCL-1 Production by Normal and Cancer Stromal Fibroblasts. Folia Biol. 2013, 59, 134–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Naito, Y.; Yamamoto, Y.; Sakamoto, N.; Shimomura, I.; Kogure, A.; Kumazaki, M.; Yokoi, A.; Yashiro, M.; Kiyono, T.; Yanagihara, K.; et al. Cancer Extracellular Vesicles Contribute to Stromal Heterogeneity by Inducing Chemokines in Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts. Oncogene 2019, 38, 5566–5579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Bardi, G.; Al-Rayan, N.; Richie, J.; Yaddanapudi, K.; Hood, J. Detection of Inflammation-Related Melanoma Small Extracellular Vesicle (sEV) mRNA Content Using Primary Melanocyte sEVs as a Reference. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 1235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  191. Bae, J.; Kim, E.; Yang, D.; Zhang, X.; Park, Y.; Lee, D.; Che, C.; Kim, J. Reciprocal Interaction between Carcinoma-Associated Fibroblasts and Squamous Carcinoma Cells through Interleukin-1α Induces Cancer Progression. Neoplasia 2014, 16, 928–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  192. Fang, L.; Che, Y.; Zhang, C.; Huang, J.; Lei, Y.; Lu, Z.; Sun, N.; He, J. LAMC1 Upregulation via TGFβ Induces Inflammatory Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma via NF-κB-CXCL1-STAT3. Mol. Oncol. 2021, 15, 3125–3146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Wen, Y.; Giardina, S.; Hamming, D.; Greenman, J.; Zachariah, E.; Bacolod, M.; Liu, H.; Shia, J.; Amenta, P.; Barany, F.; et al. GROalpha Is Highly Expressed in Adenocarcinoma of the Colon and Down-Regulates Fibulin-1. Clin. Cancer Res. 2006, 12, 5951–5959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Ijichi, H.; Chytil, A.; Gorska, A.; Aakre, M.; Bierie, B.; Tada, M.; Mohri, D.; Miyabayashi, K.; Asaoka, Y.; Maeda, S.; et al. Inhibiting Cxcr2 Disrupts Tumor-Stromal Interactions and Improves Survival in a Mouse Model of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. J. Clin. Investig. 2011, 121, 4106–4117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Mazurkiewicz, J.; Simiczyjew, A.; Dratkiewicz, E.; Pietraszek-Gremplewicz, K.; Majkowski, M.; Kot, M.; Ziętek, M.; Matkowski, R.; Nowak, D. Melanoma Cells with Diverse Invasive Potential Differentially Induce the Activation of Normal Human Fibroblasts. Cell Commun. Signal. 2022, 20, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Melillo, R.; Guarino, V.; Avilla, E.; Galdiero, M.; Liotti, F.; Prevete, N.; Rossi, F.; Basolo, F.; Ugolini, C.; de Paulis, A.; et al. Mast Cells Have a Protumorigenic Role in Human Thyroid Cancer. Oncogene 2010, 29, 6203–6215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Baechle, J.; Hanna, D.; Sekhar, K.; Rathmell, J.; Rathmell, W.; Baregamian, N. Multiplatform Computational Analysis of Mast Cells in Adrenocortical Carcinoma Tumor Microenvironment. Surgery 2022, 171, 111–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Gabrilovich, D. Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2017, 5, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Zhao, W.; Xu, Y.; Xu, J.; Wu, D.; Zhao, B.; Yin, Z.; Wang, X. Subsets of Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Express Chemokines and Chemokine Receptors Differentially. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2015, 26, 314–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  200. Shi, H.; Han, X.; Sun, Y.; Shang, C.; Wei, M.; Ba, X.; Zeng, X. Chemokine (C-X-C Motif) Ligand 1 and CXCL2 Produced by Tumor Promote the Generation of Monocytic Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells. Cancer Sci. 2018, 109, 3826–3839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  201. Wang, J.; Yu, F.; Jia, X.; Iwanowycz, S.; Wang, Y.; Huang, S.; Ai, W.; Fan, D. MicroRNA-155 Deficiency Enhances the Recruitment and Functions of Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells in Tumor Microenvironment and Promotes Solid Tumor Growth. Int. J. Cancer 2015, 136, E602–E613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  202. Zhang, H.; Li, Z.; Wang, L.; Tian, G.; Tian, J.; Yang, Z.; Cao, G.; Zhou, H.; Zhao, L.; Wu, Z.; et al. Critical Role of Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells in Tumor-Induced Liver Immune Suppression through Inhibition of NKT Cell Function. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  203. Han, X.; Shi, H.; Sun, Y.; Shang, C.; Luan, T.; Wang, D.; Ba, X.; Zeng, X. CXCR2 Expression on Granulocyte and Macrophage Progenitors under Tumor Conditions Contributes to Mo-MDSC Generation via SAP18/ERK/STAT3. Cell Death Dis. 2019, 10, 598, Erratum in Cell Death Dis. 2019, 10, 641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Ponte, A.; Marais, E.; Gallay, N.; Langonné, A.; Delorme, B.; Hérault, O.; Charbord, P.; Domenech, J. The in Vitro Migration Capacity of Human Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells: Comparison of Chemokine and Growth Factor Chemotactic Activities. Stem Cells 2007, 25, 1737–1745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Haga, H.; Yan, I.; Takahashi, K.; Wood, J.; Zubair, A.; Patel, T. Tumour Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles Interact with Mesenchymal Stem Cells to Modulate the Microenvironment and Enhance Cholangiocarcinoma Growth. J. Extracell. Vesicles 2015, 4, 24900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  206. Yu, P.; Huang, Y.; Han, Y.; Lin, L.; Sun, W.; Rabson, A.; Wang, Y.; Shi, Y. TNFα-Activated Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Promote Breast Cancer Metastasis by Recruiting CXCR2+ Neutrophils. Oncogene 2017, 36, 482–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Ryan, D.; Sinha, A.; Bogan, D.; Davies, J.; Koziol, J.; ElShamy, W. A Niche That Triggers Aggressiveness within BRCA1-IRIS Overexpressing Triple Negative Tumors Is Supported by Reciprocal Interactions with the Microenvironment. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 103182–103206, Erratum in Oncotarget 2017, 8, 113294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Le Naour, A.; Prat, M.; Thibault, B.; Mével, R.; Lemaitre, L.; Leray, H.; Joubert, M.; Coulson, K.; Golzio, M.; Lefevre, L.; et al. Tumor Cells Educate Mesenchymal Stromal Cells to Release Chemoprotective and Immunomodulatory Factors. J. Mol. Cell Biol. 2020, 12, 202–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Wu, A.; Franke, A.; Wilkens, L.; Tseng, C.; Conroy, S.; Li, Y.; Polfus, L.; De Rouen, M.; Caberto, C.; Haiman, C.; et al. Urinary Phthalate Exposures and Risk of Breast Cancer: The Multiethnic Cohort Study. Breast Cancer Res. 2021, 23, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Chang, W.; Tsai, M.; Hung, J.; Wu, K.; Tsai, Y.; Huang, Y.; Chang, C.; Tsai, P.; Hsu, Y. miR-150-5p-Containing Extracellular Vesicles Are a New Immunoregulator That Favor the Progression of Lung Cancer in Hypoxic Microenvironments by Altering the Phenotype of NK Cells. Cancers 2021, 13, 6252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Chanmee, T.; Ontong, P.; Konno, K.; Itano, N. Tumor-Associated Macrophages as Major Players in the Tumor Microenvironment. Cancers 2014, 6, 1670–1690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Shapouri-Moghaddam, A.; Mohammadian, S.; Vazini, H.; Taghadosi, M.; Esmaeili, S.; Mardani, F.; Seifi, B.; Mohammadi, A.; Afshari, J.; Sahebkar, A. Macrophage Plasticity, Polarization, and Function in Health and Disease. J. Cell. Physiol. 2018, 233, 6425–6440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Ohta, M.; Kitadai, Y.; Tanaka, S.; Yoshihara, M.; Yasui, W.; Mukaida, N.; Haruma, K.; Chayama, K. Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1 Ex-Pression Correlates with Macrophage Infiltration and Tumor Vascularity in Human Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinomas. Int. J. Cancer 2002, 102, 220–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Kuroda, T.; Kitadai, Y.; Tanaka, S.; Yang, X.; Mukaida, N.; Yoshihara, M.; Chayama, K. Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1 Transfection Induces Angiogenesis and Tumorigenesis of Gastric Carcinoma in Nude Mice via Macrophage Recruitment. Clin. Cancer Res. 2005, 11, 7629–7636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Geissmann, F.; Jung, S.; Littman, D. Blood Monocytes Consist of Two Principal Subsets with Distinct Migratory Properties. Immunity 2003, 19, 71–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  216. Kupper, R.; Dewald, B.; Jakobs, K.; Baggiolini, M.; Gierschik, P. G-Protein Activation by Interleukin 8 and Related Cytokines in Human Neutrophil Plasma Membranes. Biochem. J. 1992, 282, 429–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Di Mitri, D.; Mirenda, M.; Vasilevska, J.; Calcinotto, A.; Delaleu, N.; Revandkar, A.; Gil, V.; Boysen, G.; Losa, M.; Mosole, S.; et al. Re-education of Tumor-Associated Macrophages by CXCR2 Blockade Drives Senescence and Tumor Inhibition in Advanced Prostate Cancer. Cell Rep. 2019, 28, 2156–2168.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  218. Hu, J.; Zhao, Q.; Kong, L.; Wang, J.; Yan, J.; Xia, X.; Jia, Z.; Heimberger, A.; Li, S. Regulation of Tumor Immune Suppression and Cancer Cell Survival by CXCL1/2 Elevation in Glioblastoma Multiforme. Sci. Adv. 2021, 7, eabc2511, Erratum in Sci. Adv. 2025, 11, eadx9887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Engström, A.; Erlandsson, A.; Delbro, D.; Wijkander, J. Conditioned Media from Macrophages of M1, but Not M2 Phenotype, Inhibit the Proliferation of the Colon Cancer Cell Lines HT-29 and CACO-2. Int. J. Oncol. 2014, 44, 385–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  220. Wang, N.; Zheng, Y.; Gu, J.; Cai, Y.; Wang, S.; Zhang, F.; Chen, J.; Situ, H.; Lin, Y.; Wang, Z. Network-Pharmacology-Based Validation of TAMS/CXCL-1 as Key Mediator of XIAOPI Formula Preventing Breast Cancer Development and Metastasis. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 14513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Wang, N.; Liu, W.; Zheng, Y.; Wang, S.; Yang, B.; Li, M.; Song, J.; Zhang, F.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Q.; et al. CXCL1 Derived from Tumor-Associated Macrophages Promotes Breast Cancer Metastasis via Activating NF-κB/SOX4 Signaling. Cell Death Dis. 2018, 9, 880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Wang, S.; Liu, X.; Huang, R.; Zheng, Y.; Wang, N.; Yang, B.; Situ, H.; Lin, Y.; Wang, Z. XIAOPI Formula Inhibits Breast Cancer Stem Cells via Suppressing Tumor-Associated Macrophages/C-X-C Motif Chemokine Ligand 1 Pathway. Front. Pharmacol. 2019, 10, 1371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Zhou, Z.; Xia, G.; Xiang, Z.; Liu, M.; Wei, Z.; Yan, J.; Chen, W.; Zhu, J.; Awasthi, N.; Sun, X.; et al. A C-X-C Chemokine Receptor Type 2-Dominated Cross-Talk between Tumor Cells and Macrophages Drives Gastric Cancer Metastasis. Clin. Cancer Res. 2019, 25, 3317–3328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. Hurt, B.; Schulick, R.; Edil, B.; El Kasmi, K.; Barnett, C., Jr. Cancer-Promoting Mechanisms of Tumor-Associated Neutrophils. Am. J. Surg. 2017, 214, 938–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  225. Ohms, M.; Möller, S.; Laskay, T. An Attempt to Polarize Human Neutrophils Toward N1 and N2 Phenotypes in Vitro. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  226. Moser, B.; Clark-Lewis, I.; Zwahlen, R.; Baggiolini, M. Neutrophil-Activating Properties of the Melanoma Growth-Stimulatory Activity. J. Exp. Med. 1990, 171, 1797–1802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  227. Moser, B.; Schumacher, C.; von Tscharner, V.; Clark-Lewis, I.; Baggiolini, M. Neutrophil-Activating Peptide 2 and Gro/Melanoma Growth-Stimulatory Activity Interact with Neutrophil-Activating Peptide 1/Interleukin 8 Receptors on Human Neutrophils. J. Biol. Chem. 1991, 266, 10666–10671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  228. Brú, A.; Souto, J.; Alcolea, S.; Antón, R.; Remacha, A.; Camacho, M.; Soler, M.; Brú, I.; Porres, A.; Vila, L. Tumour Cell Lines HT-29 and FaDu Produce Proinflammatory Cytokines and Activate Neutrophils in Vitro: Possible Applications for Neutrophil-Based Antitumour Treatment. Mediat. Inflamm. 2009, 2009, 817498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  229. Sieveking, D.; Mitchell, H.; Day, A. Gastric Epithelial Cell CXC Chemokine Secretion Following Helicobacter pylori Infection in Vitro. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2004, 19, 982–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  230. Ma, X.; Aoki, T.; Tsuruyama, T.; Narumiya, S. Definition of Prostaglandin E2-EP2 Signals in the Colon Tumor Microenvironment That Amplify Inflammation and Tumor Growth. Cancer Res. 2015, 75, 2822–2832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  231. Nywening, T.; Belt, B.; Cullinan, D.; Panni, R.; Han, B.; Sanford, D.; Jacobs, R.; Ye, J.; Patel, A.; Gillanders, W.; et al. Targeting Both Tumour-Associated CXCR2+ Neutrophils and CCR2+ Macrophages Disrupts Myeloid Recruitment and Improves Chemotherapeutic Responses in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Gut 2018, 67, 1112–1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  232. Arpinati, L.; Kaisar-Iluz, N.; Shaul, M.; Groth, C.; Umansky, V.; Fridlender, Z. Tumor-Derived Factors Differentially Affect the Recruitment and Plasticity of Neutrophils. Cancers 2021, 13, 5082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  233. Dunican, A.; Grutkoski, P.; Leuenroth, S.; Ayala, A.; Simms, H. Neutrophils Regulate Their Own Apoptosis via Preservation of CXC Re-Ceptors. J. Surg. Res. 2000, 90, 32–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  234. Jablonska, J.; Wu, C.; Andzinski, L.; Leschner, S.; Weiss, S. CXCR2-Mediated Tumor-Associated Neutrophil Recruitment Is Regulated by IFN-β. Int. J. Cancer. 2014, 134, 1346–1358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  235. Timaxian, C.; Vogel, C.; Orcel, C.; Vetter, D.; Durochat, C.; Chinal, C.; NGuyen, P.; Aknin, M.; Mercier-Nomé, F.; Davy, M.; et al. Pivotal Role for Cxcr2 in Regulating Tu-Mor-Associated Neutrophil in Breast Cancer. Cancers 2021, 13, 2584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  236. Strell, C.; Lang, K.; Niggemann, B.; Zaenker, K.; Entschladen, F. Neutrophil Granulocytes Promote the Migratory Activity of MDA-MB-468 Human Breast Carcinoma Cells via ICAM-1. Exp. Cell Res. 2010, 316, 138–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  237. Najafi, M.; Farhood, B.; Mortezaee, K. Contribution of Regulatory T Cells to Cancer: A Review. J. Cell. Physiol. 2019, 234, 7983–7993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  238. Chang, A.; Miska, J.; Wainwright, D.; Dey, M.; Rivetta, C.; Yu, D.; Kanojia, D.; Pituch, K.; Qiao, J.; Pytel, P.; et al. CCL2 Produced by the Glioma Microenvironment Is Essential for the Recruitment of Regulatory T Cells and Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells. Cancer Res. 2016, 76, 5671–5682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  239. Mizukami, Y.; Kono, K.; Kawaguchi, Y.; Akaike, H.; Kamimura, K.; Sugai, H.; Fujii, H. CCL17 and CCL22 Chemokines within Tumor Microenvironment Are Related to Accumulation of Foxp3+ Regulatory T Cells in Gastric Cancer. Int. J. Cancer 2008, 122, 2286–2293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  240. Chen, B.; Zhang, D.; Zhou, J.; Li, Q.; Zhou, L.; Li, S.; Zhu, L.; Chou, K.; Zhou, L.; Tao, L.; et al. High CCR6/CCR7 Expression and Foxp3+ Treg Cell Number Are Positively Related to the Progression of Laryngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Oncol. Rep. 2013, 30, 1380–1390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  241. Su, S.; Liao, J.; Liu, J.; Huang, D.; He, C.; Chen, F.; Yang, L.; Wu, W.; Chen, J.; Lin, L.; et al. Blocking the Recruitment of Naive CD4+ T Cells Reverses Immunosuppression in Breast Cancer. Cell Res. 2017, 27, 461–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  242. Redjimi, N.; Raffin, C.; Raimbaud, I.; Pignon, P.; Matsuzaki, J.; Odunsi, K.; Valmori, D.; Ayyoub, M. CXCR3+ T Regulatory Cells Selectively Accumulate in Human Ovarian Carcinomas to Limit Type I Immunity. Cancer Res. 2012, 72, 4351–4360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  243. Santagata, S.; Napolitano, M.; D’Alterio, C.; Desicato, S.; Maro, S.; Marinelli, L.; Fragale, A.; Buoncervello, M.; Persico, F.; Gabriele, L.; et al. Targeting CXCR4 Reverts the Suppressive Activity of T-Regulatory Cells in Renal Cancer. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 77110–77120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  244. Li, Y.; Wu, T.; Gong, S.; Zhou, H.; Yu, L.; Liang, M.; Shi, R.; Wu, Z.; Zhang, J.; Li, S. Analysis of the Prognosis and Therapeutic Value of the CXC Chemokine Family in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Front. Oncol. 2021, 10, 570736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  245. Ogata, H.; Sekikawa, A.; Yamagishi, H.; Ichikawa, K.; Tomita, S.; Imura, J.; Ito, Y.; Fujita, M.; Tsubaki, M.; Kato, H.; et al. GROα Promotes Invasion of Colorectal Cancer Cells. Oncol. Rep. 2010, 24, 1479–1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  246. Zhou, Y.; Zhang, J.; Liu, Q.; Bell, R.; Muruve, D.; Forsyth, P.; Arcellana-Panlilio, M.; Robbins, S.; Yong, V. The Chemokine GRO-Alpha (CXCL1) Confers Increased Tumorigenicity to Glioma Cells. Carcinogenesis 2005, 26, 2058–2068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  247. Reiland, J.; Furcht, L.; McCarthy, J. CXC-Chemokines Stimulate Invasion and Chemotaxis in Prostate Carcinoma Cells through the CXCR2 Receptor. Prostate 1999, 41, 78–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  248. Cheng, W.; Wang, C.; Huang, Y.; Tsai, M.; Liang, Y.; Lin, K. Overexpression of CXCL1 and Its Receptor CXCR2 Promote Tumor In-Vasion in Gastric Cancer. Ann. Oncol. 2011, 22, 2267–2276, Erratum in Ann. Oncol. 2011, 22, 2537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  249. Wang, J.; Song, W.; Shen, W.; Yang, X.; Sun, W.; Qu, S.; Shang, R.; Ma, B.; Pu, M.; Tao, K.; et al. MicroRNA-200a Suppresses Cell Invasion and Migration by Directly Targeting GAB1 in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Oncol. Res. 2017, 25, 1–10, Erratum in Oncol. Res. 2019, 27, 281–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  250. Xiang, Z.; Zhou, Z.; Xia, G.; Zhang, X.; Wei, Z.; Zhu, J.; Yu, J.; Chen, W.; He, Y.; Schwarz, R.; et al. A Positive Crosstalk between CXCR4 and CXCR2 Promotes Gastric Cancer Metastasis. Oncogene 2017, 36, 5122–5133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  251. Mitrovic, B.; Schaeffer, D.; Riddell, R.; Kirsch, R. Tumor Budding in Colorectal Carcinoma: Time to Take Notice. Mod. Pathol. 2012, 25, 1315–1325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  252. Guil-Luna, S.; Mena, R.; Navarrete-Sirvent, C.; López-Sánchez, L.; Khouadri, K.; Toledano-Fonseca, M.; Mantrana, A.; Guler, I.; Villar, C.; Díaz, C.; et al. Association of Tumor Budding with Immune Evasion Pathways in Primary Colorectal Cancer and Patient-Derived Xenografts. Front. Med. 2020, 7, 264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  253. Hanahan, D.; Weinberg, R. Hallmarks of Cancer: The next Generation. Cell 2011, 144, 646–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  254. Chang, Y.; di Tomaso, E.; McDonald, D.; Jones, R.; Jain, R.; Munn, L. Mosaic Blood Vessels in Tumors: Frequency of Cancer Cells in Contact with Flowing Blood. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 14608–14613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  255. Kim, M.; Oskarsson, T.; Acharyya, S.; Nguyen, D.; Zhang, X.; Norton, L.; Massagué, J. Tumor Self-Seeding by Circulating Cancer Cells. Cell 2009, 139, 1315–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  256. Divella, R.; Daniele, A.; Abbate, I.; Bellizzi, A.; Savino, E.; Simone, G.; Giannone, G.; Giuliani, F.; Fazio, V.; Gadaleta-Caldarola, G.; et al. The Presence of Clustered Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs) and Circulating Cytokines Define an Aggressive Phenotype in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Cancer Causes Control 2014, 25, 1531–1541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  257. Doglioni, G.; Parik, S.; Fendt, S. Interactions in the (Pre)Metastatic Niche Support Metastasis Formation. Front. Oncol. 2019, 9, 219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  258. Lee, Y.; Gajdosik, M.; Josic, D.; Clifton, J.; Logothetis, C.; Yu-Lee, L.; Gallick, G.; Maity, S.; Lin, S. Secretome Analysis of an Osteogenic Prostate Tumor Identifies Complex Signaling Networks Mediating Cross-Talk of Cancer and Stromal Cells within the Tumor Microenvironment. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2015, 14, 471–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  259. Westhrin, M.; Moen, S.; Holien, T.; Mylin, A.; Heickendorff, L.; Olsen, O.; Sundan, A.; Turesson, I.; Gimsing, P.; Waage, A.; et al. Growth Differentiation Factor 15 (GDF15) Promotes Osteoclast Differentiation and Inhibits Osteoblast Differentiation and High Serum GDF15 Levels Are Associated with Multiple Myeloma Bone Disease. Haematologica 2015, 100, e511–e514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  260. Grassi, F.; Piacentini, A.; Cristino, S.; Toneguzzi, S.; Cavallo, C.; Facchini, A.; Lisignoli, G. Human Osteoclasts Express Different CXC Chemo-Kines Depending on Cell Culture Substrate: Molecular and Immunocytochemical Evidence of High Levels of CXCL10 and CXCL12. Histochem. Cell Biol. 2003, 120, 391–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  261. Hardaway, A.; Herroon, M.; Rajagurubandara, E.; Podgorski, I. Marrow Adipocyte-Derived CXCL1 and CXCL2 Contribute to Osteolysis in Metastatic Prostate Cancer. Clin. Exp. Metastasis 2015, 32, 353–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  262. Sharma, B.; Nannuru, K.; Saxena, S.; Varney, M.; Singh, R. CXCR2: A Novel Mediator of Mammary Tumor Bone Metastasis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  263. Onan, D.; Allan, E.; Quinn, J.; Gooi, J.; Pompolo, S.; Sims, N.; Gillespie, M.; Martin, T. The Chemokine Cxcl1 Is a Novel Target Gene of Parathyroid Hormone (PTH)/PTH-Related Protein in Committed Osteoblasts. Endocrinology 2009, 150, 2244–2253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  264. Chao, C.; Lee, C.; Chang, T.; Chen, P.; Liu, J. CXCL1/CXCR2 Paracrine Axis Contributes to Lung Metastasis in Osteosarcoma. Cancers 2020, 12, 459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  265. Strell, C.; Niggemann, B.; Voss, M.; Powe, D.; Zänker, K.; Entschladen, F. Norepinephrine Promotes the Β1-Integrin-Mediated Adhesion of MDA-MB-231 Cells to Vascular Endothelium by the Induction of a GROα Release. Mol. Cancer Res. 2012, 10, 197–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  266. Lee, C.; Chiang, Y.; Yu, P.; Peng, K.; Chi, M.; Lee, M.; Fang, M.; Lee, K.; Hsu, L.; Liu, J. A Role of CXCL1 Drives Osteosarcoma Lung Metastasis via VCAM-1 Production. Front. Oncol. 2021, 11, 735277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  267. Xing, F.; Liu, Y.; Sharma, S.; Wu, K.; Chan, M.; Lo, H.; Carpenter, R.; Metheny-Barlow, L.; Zhou, X.; Qasem, S.; et al. Activation of the C-Met Pathway Mobilizes an Inflammatory Network in the Brain Microenvironment to Promote Brain Metastasis of Breast Cancer. Cancer Res. 2016, 76, 4970–4980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  268. Schulten, H.; Hussein, D.; Al-Adwani, F.; Karim, S.; Al-Maghrabi, J.; Al-Sharif, M.; Jamal, A.; Bakhashab, S.; Weaver, J.; Al-Ghamdi, F.; et al. Microarray Expression Profiling Identifies Genes, Including Cytokines, and Biofunctions, as Diapedesis, Associated with a Brain Metastasis from a Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2016, 6, 2140–2161. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  269. Yung, M.; Tang, H.; Cai, P.; Leung, T.; Ngu, S.; Chan, K.; Xu, D.; Yang, H.; Ngan, H.; Chan, D. GRO-α and IL-8 Enhance Ovarian Cancer Metastatic Potential via the CXCR2-Mediated TAK1/NFκB Signaling Cascade. Theranostics 2018, 8, 1270–1285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  270. Fu, X.; Deng, J.; Xu, W.; Chen, J.; Sun, J.; Deng, H. Histidine Decarboxylase-Expressing PMN-MDSC-Derived TGF-Β1 Promotes the Epi-Thelial-Mesenchymal Transition of Metastatic Lung Adenocarcinoma. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2020, 13, 1361–1371. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  271. Hatano, T.; Yashiro, M.; Fujikawa, H.; Motomura, H. C-X-C Motif Ligand 1 (CXCL1) from Melanoma Cells down-Regulates the Invasion of Their Metastatic Melanoma Cells. Oncotarget 2018, 9, 31090–31097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  272. Aoyagi, T.; Terracina, K.; Raza, A.; Matsubara, H.; Takabe, K. Cancer Cachexia, Mechanism and Treatment. World J. Gastrointest. Oncol. 2015, 7, 17–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  273. Wva, E.; Vocka, M.; Spacek, J.; Konopasek, B.; Fucikova, T.; Petruzelka, L. Cellular and Humoral Immunodeficiency in Breast Cancer Patients Resistant to Hormone Therapy. Neoplasma 2014, 61, 90–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  274. Pyter, L.; Suarez-Kelly, L.; Carson, W., 3rd; Kaur, J.; Bellisario, J.; Bever, S. Novel Rodent Model of Breast Cancer Survival with Persistent Anxiety-like Behavior and Inflammation. Behav. Brain Res. 2017, 330, 108–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  275. Xu, J.; Zhu, M.; Zhang, X.; Tian, H.; Zhang, J.; Wu, X.; Gao, Y. NFκB-Mediated CXCL1 Production in Spinal Cord Astrocytes Contributes to the Maintenance of Bone Cancer Pain in Mice. J. Neuroinflamm. 2014, 11, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  276. Ni, H.; Wang, Y.; An, K.; Liu, Q.; Xu, L.; Zhu, C.; Deng, H.; He, Q.; Wang, T.; Xu, M.; et al. Crosstalk between NFκB-Dependent Astrocytic CXCL1 and Neuron CXCR2 Plays a Role in Descending Pain Facilitation. J. Neuroinflamm. 2019, 16, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  277. Cedervall, J.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, H.; Zhang, L.; Femel, J.; Dimberg, A.; Olsson, A. Neutrophil Extracellular Traps Accumulate in Peripheral Blood Vessels and Compromise Organ Function in Tumor-Bearing Animals. Cancer Res. 2015, 75, 2653–2662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  278. Divella, R.; Daniele, A.; Savino, E.; Palma, F.; Bellizzi, A.; Giotta, F.; Simone, G.; Lioce, M.; Quaranta, M.; Paradiso, A.; et al. Circulating Levels of Transforming Growth Factor-Βeta (TGF-β) and Chemokine (C-X-C Motif) Ligand-1 (CXCL1) as Predictors of Distant Seeding of Circulating Tumor Cells in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer. Anticancer Res. 2013, 33, 1491–1497. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  279. Hogan, K.; Cho, D.; Arneson, P.; Samani, A.; Palines, P.; Yang, Y.; Doles, J. Tumor-Derived Cytokines Impair Myogenesis and Alter the Skeletal Muscle Immune Microenvironment. Cytokine 2018, 107, 9–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  280. Masuda, S.; Tanaka, M.; Inoue, T.; Ohue-Kitano, R.; Yamakage, H.; Muranaka, K.; Kusakabe, T.; Shimatsu, A.; Hasegawa, K.; Satoh-Asahara, N. Chemokine (C-X-C Motif) Ligand 1 Is a Myokine Induced by Palmitate and Is Required for Myogenesis in Mouse Satellite Cells. Acta Physiol. 2018, 222, e12975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  281. Martin, C.; Burdon, P.; Bridger, G.; Gutierrez-Ramos, J.; Williams, T.; Rankin, S. Chemokines Acting via CXCR2 and CXCR4 Control the Release of Neutrophils from the Bone Marrow and Their Return Following Senescence. Immunity 2003, 19, 583–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  282. Jin, L.; Batra, S.; Jeyaseelan, S. Diminished Neutrophil Extracellular Trap (NET) Formation Is a Novel Innate Immune Deficiency Induced by Acute Ethanol Exposure in Polymicrobial Sepsis, Which Can Be Rescued by CXCL1. PLoS Pathog. 2017, 13, e1006637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  283. Norden, D.; Bicer, S.; Clark, Y.; Jing, R.; Henry, C.; Wold, L.; Reiser, P.; Godbout, J.; McCarthy, D. Tumor Growth Increases Neuroin-Flammation, Fatigue and Depressive-like Behavior Prior to Alterations in Muscle Function. Brain Behav. Immun. 2015, 43, 76–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  284. Song, A.; Gao, B.; Fan, J.; Zhu, Y.; Zhou, J.; Wang, Y.; Xu, L.; Wu, W. NLRP1 Inflammasome Contributes to Chronic Stress-Induced Depressive-like Behaviors in Mice. J. Neuroinflamm. 2020, 17, 178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  285. Campbell, S.; Meier, U.; Mardiguian, S.; Jiang, Y.; Littleton, E.; Bristow, A.; Relton, J.; Connor, T.; Anthony, D. Sickness Behaviour Is Induced by a Peripheral CXC-Chemokine Also Expressed in Multiple Sclerosis and EAE. Brain Behav. Immun. 2010, 24, 738–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  286. Ni, H.; Xu, M.; Xie, K.; Fei, Y.; Deng, H.; He, Q.; Wang, T.; Liu, S.; Zhu, J.; Xu, L.; et al. Liquiritin Alleviates Pain Through Inhibiting CXCL1/CXCR2 Signaling Pathway in Bone Cancer Pain Rat. Front. Pharmacol. 2020, 11, 436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  287. Liu, S.; Liu, Y.; Song, W.; Song, X. EphrinB-EphB Receptor Signaling Contributes to Bone Cancer Pain via Toll-like Receptor and Proin-Flammatory Cytokines in Rat Spinal Cord. Pain 2013, 154, 2823–2835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  288. Chooi, Y.; Ding, C.; Magkos, F. The Epidemiology of Obesity. Metabolism 2019, 92, 6–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  289. Harris, R.; Card, T.; Delahooke, T.; Aithal, G.; Guha, I. Obesity Is the Most Common Risk Factor for Chronic Liver Disease: Results from a Risk Stratification Pathway Using Transient Elastography. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2019, 114, 1744–1752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  290. Jenkins, D.; Wade, K.; Carslake, D.; Bowden, J.; Sattar, N.; Loos, R.; Timpson, N.; Sperrin, M.; Rutter, M. Estimating the Causal Effect of BMI on Mortality Risk in People with Heart Disease, Diabetes and Cancer Using Mendelian Randomization. Int. J. Cardiol. 2021, 330, 214–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  291. Renehan, A.; Tyson, M.; Egger, M.; Heller, R.; Zwahlen, M. Body-Mass Index and Incidence of Cancer: A Systematic Review and Me-Ta-Analysis of Prospective Observational Studies. Lancet 2008, 371, 569–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  292. Rivera-Izquierdo, M.; Pérez de Rojas, J.; Martínez-Ruiz, V.; Pérez-Gómez, B.; Sánchez, M.; Khan, K.; Jiménez-Moleón, J. Obesity as a Risk Factor for Prostate Cancer Mortality: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of 280,199 Patients. Cancers 2021, 13, 4169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  293. Maury, E.; Brichard, S.; Pataky, Z.; Carpentier, A.; Golay, A.; Bobbioni-Harsch, E. Effect of Obesity on Growth-Related Oncogene Factor-Alpha, Thrombopoietin, and Tissue Inhibitor Metalloproteinase-1 Serum Levels. Obesity 2010, 18, 1503–1509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  294. Maury, E.; Ehala-Aleksejev, K.; Guiot, Y.; Detry, R.; Vandenhooft, A.; Brichard, S. Adipokines Oversecreted by Omental Adipose Tissue in Human Obesity. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2007, 293, E656–E665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  295. Gibson, J.; Orlandella, R.; Turbitt, W.; Behring, M.; Manne, U.; Sorge, R.; Norian, L. Obesity-Associated Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells Promote Apoptosis of Tumor-Infiltrating CD8 T Cells and Immunotherapy Resistance in Breast Cancer. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 590794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  296. Dahlquist, K.; Voth, L.; Fee, A.; Stoeckman, A. An Autocrine Role for CXCL1 in Progression of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Anticancer Res. 2020, 40, 6075–6081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  297. Choe, D.; Lee, E.; Beeghly-Fadiel, A.; Wilson, A.; Whalen, M.; Adunyah, S.; Son, D. High-Fat Diet-Induced Obese Effects of Adipo-Cyte-Specific CXCR2 Conditional Knockout in the Peritoneal Tumor Microenvironment of Ovarian Cancer. Cancers 2021, 13, 5033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  298. Hariharan, N.; Ashcraft, K.; Svatek, R.; Livi, C.; Wilson, D.; Kaushik, D.; Leach, R.; Johnson-Pais, T. Adipose Tissue-Secreted Factors Alter Bladder Cancer Cell Migration. J. Obes. 2018, 2018, 9247864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  299. Ouh, Y.; Cho, H.; Lee, J.; Choi, S.; Choi, H.; Hong, J. CXC Chemokine Ligand 1 Mediates Adiponectin-Induced Angiogenesis in Ovarian Cancer. Tumour Biol. 2019, 42, 1010428319842699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  300. Farquharson, A.; Steele, R.; Carey, F.; Drew, J. Novel Multiplex Method to Assess Insulin, Leptin and Adiponectin Regulation of in-Flammatory Cytokines Associated with Colon Cancer. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2012, 39, 5727–5736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  301. Meilleur, K.; Doumatey, A.; Huang, H.; Charles, B.; Chen, G.; Zhou, J.; Shriner, D.; Adeyemo, A.; Rotimi, C. Circulating Adiponectin Is Associated with Obesity and Serum Lipids in West Africans. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2010, 95, 3517–3521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  302. De Franciscis, P.; Barbieri, M.; Leo, S.; Dalise, A.; Sardu, C.; Marfella, R.; Colacurci, N.; Paolisso, G.; Rizzo, M. Serum Adiponectin Levels Are Associated with Worse Cognitive Function in Postmenopausal Women. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0186205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  303. Seirafian, S.; Momeni, A.; Taheri, S.; Mortazavi, M.; Paknahad, Z. Serum Leptin Level Has a Positive Correlation with BMI and Creatinine Clearance in CAPD Patients. Bratisl. Lek. Listy 2012, 113, 486–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  304. Buschmann, K.; Wrobel, J.; Chaban, R.; Rösch, R.; Ghazy, A.; Hanf, A.; Schäfer, K.; Daiber, A.; Beiras-Fernandez, A.; Vahl, C. Body Mass Index (BMI) and Its Influence on the Cardiovascular and Operative Risk Profile in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Patients: Impact of Inflammation and Leptin. Oxidative Med. Cell Longev. 2020, 2020, 5724024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  305. Padidar, S.; Farquharson, A.; Williams, L.; Kelaiditi, E.; Hoggard, N.; Arthur, J.; Drew, J. Leptin Up-Regulates pro-Inflammatory Cyto-Kines in Discrete Cells within Mouse Colon. J. Cell. Physiol. 2011, 226, 2123–2130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  306. Berndt, J.; Klöting, N.; Kralisch, S.; Kovacs, P.; Fasshauer, M.; Schön, M.; Stumvoll, M.; Blüher, M. Plasma Visfatin Concentrations and Fat Depot-Specific mRNA Expression in Humans. Diabetes 2005, 54, 2911–2916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  307. Li, H.; Che, X.; Zhao, W.; He, S.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, R.; Fan, L.; Jia, Z. Diet-Induced Obesity Promotes Murine Gastric Cancer Growth through a Nampt/Sirt1/c-Myc Positive Feedback Loop. Oncol. Rep. 2013, 30, 2153–2160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  308. Wang, Y.; Chen, H.; Lo, S.; Chen, Y.; Huang, Y.; Hu, S.; Hsieh, Y.; Hung, A.; Hou, M.; Yuan, S. Visfatin Enhances Breast Cancer Progression through CXCL1 Induction in Tumor-Associated Macrophages. Cancers 2020, 12, 3526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  309. Ghaemmaghami, S.; Mohaddes, S.; Hedayati, M.; Gorgian Mohammadi, M.; Dehbashi, G. Resistin and Visfatin Expression in HCT-116 Colorectal Cancer Cell Line. Int. J. Mol. Cell. Med. 2013, 2, 143–150. [Google Scholar]
  310. Grolla, A.; Torretta, S.; Gnemmi, I.; Amoruso, A.; Orsomando, G.; Gatti, M.; Caldarelli, A.; Lim, D.; Penengo, L.; Brunelleschi, S.; et al. Nicotinamide Phosphoribosyltransferase (NAMPT/PBEF/Visfatin) Is a Tumoural Cytokine Released from Melanoma. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2015, 28, 718–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  311. Wang, B.; Hasan, M.; Alvarado, E.; Yuan, H.; Wu, H.; Chen, W. NAMPT Overexpression in Prostate Cancer and Its Contribution to Tumor Cell Survival and Stress Response. Oncogene 2011, 30, 907–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  312. Yamamoto, Y.; Kuroda, K.; Sera, T.; Sugimoto, A.; Kushiyama, S.; Nishimura, S.; Togano, S.; Okuno, T.; Yoshii, M.; Tamura, T.; et al. The Clinicopathological Significance of the CXCR2 Ligands, CXCL1, CXCL2, CXCL3, CXCL5, CXCL6, CXCL7, and CXCL8 in Gastric Cancer. Anticancer Res. 2019, 39, 6645–6652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  313. Liu, K.; Lai, M.; Wang, S.; Zheng, K.; Xie, S.; Wang, X. Construction of a CXC Chemokine-Based Prediction Model for the Prognosis of Colon Cancer. BioMed Res. Int. 2020, 2020, 6107865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  314. Sun, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Guo, Y.; Yang, Z.; Xu, Y. A Prognostic Model Based on the Immune-Related Genes in Colon Adenocarcinoma. Int. J. Med. Sci. 2020, 17, 1879–1896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  315. Chiu, S.; Hsieh, F.; Chen, S.; Chen, C.; Shu, H.; Li, H. Clinicopathologic Correlation of Up-Regulated Genes Identified Using cDNA Microarray and Real-Time Reverse Transcription-PCR in Human Colorectal Cancer. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2005, 14, 437–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  316. Wang, D.; Luo, Y.; Guo, Y.; Li, G.; Li, F. A-Kinase Interacting Protein 1, a Potential Biomarker Associated with Advanced Tumor Features and CXCL1/2 in Prostate Cancer. Int. J. Biol. Markers 2020, 35, 74–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  317. Lee, Y.; Tan, Y.; Oon, C. Molecular Targeted Therapy: Treating Cancer with Specificity. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2018, 834, 188–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  318. McGuire, V.; Hartge, P.; Liao, L.; Sinha, R.; Bernstein, L.; Canchola, A.; Anderson, G.; Stefanick, M.; Whittemore, A. Parity and Oral Contraceptive Use in Relation to Ovarian Cancer Risk in Older Women. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2016, 25, 1059–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  319. Urzúa, U.; Chacón, C.; Norambuena, M.; Lizama, L.; Sarmiento, S.; Asaki, E.; Powell, J.; Ampuero, S. The Ovarian Transcriptome of Re-Productively Aged Multiparous Mice: Candidate Genes for Ovarian Cancer Protection. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  320. Cohen, C.; Shea, A.; Heffron, C.; Schmelz, E.; Roberts, P. The Parity-Associated Microenvironmental Niche in the Omental Fat Band Is Refractory to Ovarian Cancer Metastasis. Cancer Prev. Res. 2013, 6, 1182–1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  321. Korbecki, J.; Bosiacki, M.; Chlubek, D.; Baranowska-Bosiacka, I. Bioinformatic Analysis of the CXCR2 Ligands in Cancer Processes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 27, 13287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. The role of CXCL1 in cancer cell proliferation. CXCL1 activation of CXCR2 triggers the transactivation of EGFR, a process mediated by increased MMP activity, which releases HB-EGF. This growth factor subsequently activates EGFR, promoting cancer cell proliferation. Additionally, CXCL1 exerts anti-apoptotic effects by upregulating Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL, the key proteins that inhibit apoptosis. Through CXCR2 signaling, CXCL1 also activates the Akt/protein kinase B (PKB)–murine double minute 2 (Mdm2) pathway, leading to the suppression of p53 activity. This reduction in p53 function removes its inhibitory effects on cell proliferation and apoptosis induction, further contributing to tumor growth.
Figure 1. The role of CXCL1 in cancer cell proliferation. CXCL1 activation of CXCR2 triggers the transactivation of EGFR, a process mediated by increased MMP activity, which releases HB-EGF. This growth factor subsequently activates EGFR, promoting cancer cell proliferation. Additionally, CXCL1 exerts anti-apoptotic effects by upregulating Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL, the key proteins that inhibit apoptosis. Through CXCR2 signaling, CXCL1 also activates the Akt/protein kinase B (PKB)–murine double minute 2 (Mdm2) pathway, leading to the suppression of p53 activity. This reduction in p53 function removes its inhibitory effects on cell proliferation and apoptosis induction, further contributing to tumor growth.
Ijms 27 02693 g001
Figure 2. CXCL1 in cellular senescence. Stress-induced cellular senescence is driven by the activation of NF-κB and p53. NF-κB upregulates the expression of CXCL1 and CXCL8, while p53 increases the expression of their receptor, CXCR2, leading to receptor activation. CXCR2 signaling reinforces and maintains the senescent state of the cell but does not promote proliferation due to p53-mediated inhibition. However, if p53 function is compromised, CXCR2 activation can drive cell proliferation, potentially leading to oncogenic transformation of previously senescent cells.
Figure 2. CXCL1 in cellular senescence. Stress-induced cellular senescence is driven by the activation of NF-κB and p53. NF-κB upregulates the expression of CXCL1 and CXCL8, while p53 increases the expression of their receptor, CXCR2, leading to receptor activation. CXCR2 signaling reinforces and maintains the senescent state of the cell but does not promote proliferation due to p53-mediated inhibition. However, if p53 function is compromised, CXCR2 activation can drive cell proliferation, potentially leading to oncogenic transformation of previously senescent cells.
Ijms 27 02693 g002
Figure 3. Interaction between endothelial cells and cancer cells via CXCL1, VEGF, and EGFR ligands. Activation of VEGFR1 and CXCR2 in cancer cells enhances Bcl-2 expression and activates NF-κB, leading to increased production of CXCL1 and CXCL8, which accumulate in the tumor microenvironment. Concurrently, EGFR activation in cancer cells further stimulates CXCL1 and CXCL8 expression through NF-κB signaling. Additionally, CXCR2 activation in cancer cells promotes VEGF production via STAT3 activation, reinforcing a pro-tumorigenic environment. Cancer cells also secrete EGFR ligands, which activate EGFR in endothelial cells, increasing Bcl-xL expression. This in turn enhances VEGF production, which autocrinely activates VEGFR2 in endothelial cells. VEGFR2 activation upregulates Bcl-2, further promoting VEGF expression via STAT3 and increasing CXCL1 and CXCL8 levels through NF-κB signaling. This feedback loop may also stimulate the expression of EGFR ligands, amplifying the pro-tumorigenic signaling cascade. Additionally, CXCL1 and CXCL8 produced by cancer cells activate CXCR2 in endothelial cells, leading to EGFR transactivation and increased VEGF expression, further supporting tumor angiogenesis and progression.
Figure 3. Interaction between endothelial cells and cancer cells via CXCL1, VEGF, and EGFR ligands. Activation of VEGFR1 and CXCR2 in cancer cells enhances Bcl-2 expression and activates NF-κB, leading to increased production of CXCL1 and CXCL8, which accumulate in the tumor microenvironment. Concurrently, EGFR activation in cancer cells further stimulates CXCL1 and CXCL8 expression through NF-κB signaling. Additionally, CXCR2 activation in cancer cells promotes VEGF production via STAT3 activation, reinforcing a pro-tumorigenic environment. Cancer cells also secrete EGFR ligands, which activate EGFR in endothelial cells, increasing Bcl-xL expression. This in turn enhances VEGF production, which autocrinely activates VEGFR2 in endothelial cells. VEGFR2 activation upregulates Bcl-2, further promoting VEGF expression via STAT3 and increasing CXCL1 and CXCL8 levels through NF-κB signaling. This feedback loop may also stimulate the expression of EGFR ligands, amplifying the pro-tumorigenic signaling cascade. Additionally, CXCL1 and CXCL8 produced by cancer cells activate CXCR2 in endothelial cells, leading to EGFR transactivation and increased VEGF expression, further supporting tumor angiogenesis and progression.
Ijms 27 02693 g003
Figure 4. The involvement of CXCL1 in the cancer-related mechanisms discussed in this review. CXCL1 in the tumor microenvironment is produced by cancer cells as well as by certain tumor-associated cells, including CAFs, mast cells, and TANs. CXCL1 acts both on cancer cells and on tumor-associated cells.
Figure 4. The involvement of CXCL1 in the cancer-related mechanisms discussed in this review. CXCL1 in the tumor microenvironment is produced by cancer cells as well as by certain tumor-associated cells, including CAFs, mast cells, and TANs. CXCL1 acts both on cancer cells and on tumor-associated cells.
Ijms 27 02693 g004
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Korbecki, J.; Bosiacki, M.; Dzięciołowska-Baran, E.; Pawlik, P.; Lubkowski, M.; Walaszek, I.; Barczak, K. The Significance of CXCL1 in Cancer: An Overview of Molecular Mechanisms. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27, 2693. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27062693

AMA Style

Korbecki J, Bosiacki M, Dzięciołowska-Baran E, Pawlik P, Lubkowski M, Walaszek I, Barczak K. The Significance of CXCL1 in Cancer: An Overview of Molecular Mechanisms. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2026; 27(6):2693. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27062693

Chicago/Turabian Style

Korbecki, Jan, Mateusz Bosiacki, Edyta Dzięciołowska-Baran, Patrycja Pawlik, Michał Lubkowski, Ireneusz Walaszek, and Katarzyna Barczak. 2026. "The Significance of CXCL1 in Cancer: An Overview of Molecular Mechanisms" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 27, no. 6: 2693. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27062693

APA Style

Korbecki, J., Bosiacki, M., Dzięciołowska-Baran, E., Pawlik, P., Lubkowski, M., Walaszek, I., & Barczak, K. (2026). The Significance of CXCL1 in Cancer: An Overview of Molecular Mechanisms. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 27(6), 2693. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27062693

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop