Digital Transformation in Education Systems Integrating Generative AI

A special issue of Systems (ISSN 2079-8954).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 October 2024) | Viewed by 4984

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Institut für Bildungsmanagement und Bildungstechnologien, Universität St. Gallen, 9000 St. Gallen, Switzerland
Interests: digital transformation in education; artificial intelligence in education; AI literacy; design-based research on AI-based technologies in education

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Education systems around the world are undergoing a significant digital transformation, driven by advances in artificial intelligence (AI). This era of transformation is redefining education at all levels, highlighting the critical role of AI in improving educational practices and outcomes and leading to socio-technical innovation. The socio-technical paradigm provides a framework for understanding and designing digital innovation in organizations. The socio-technical systems design approach views organizations as an interplay between social and technical systems (Bostrom & Heinen, 1977; Götzen et al., 2023). The core idea is that both technological requirements and the social needs of the people involved need to be considered. Consequently, the socio-technical design of systems enables a holistic view of work processes by considering not only technical processes but also social interactions and structures within an organization. Socio-technical system design therefore distinguishes between a technical subsystem with the workflows of a task and the technologies needed to transform inputs into outputs (Mumford, 2000). In contrast, the social subsystem focuses on the attitudes, skills and values of system members and their structural relationships with each other. The interaction between these two subsystems ultimately leads to the desired outcomes of a work system. The primary goal of a socio-technical system architecture is the meaningful design of human–machine interaction (Urze et al., 2020), incorporating generative AI to foster augmented, hybrid intelligence.

This Special Issue focuses on the design of socio-technical systems that integrate AI in education. In an era of rapid technological advancement, particularly due to the emergence of generative AI, the importance and prevalence of socio-technical systems design is increasing significantly (Latniak et al., 2023). We invite empirical and literature review submissions that address, but are not limited to, the following themes and questions:

  • In what ways can a socio-technological perspective help to navigate the ethical considerations associated with AI in education, including issues of data privacy, algorithmic bias, and ensuring digital equity?
  • How should or could hybrid intelligence between humans and machines be designed, and what implications does this have for the education system?
  • How can the social subsystem, focusing on system members’ attitudes, skills, and values, be effectively engaged and developed in AI-enhanced education systems?
  • How can the technical subsystem (technical infrastructure based on large language models) be designed in education systems?
  • How can participatory design approaches, involving educators, students, and other stakeholders, be used to co-create AI-driven educational innovations that align with socio-technical values and principles?
  • What are some case studies of successful digital transformation initiatives within educational systems, highlighting lessons learned and best practices in leveraging AI?

References 

Bostrom, R. P. & Heinen, J. S. (1977). MIS Problems and Failures: A Socio-Technical Perspective, Part II: The Application of Socio-Technical Theory. MIS Quarterly, 1(4), 11. https://doi.org/10.2307/249019

Latniak, E., Tisch, A. & Kauffeld, S. (2023). Zur Aktualität soziotechnischer Arbeits- und Systemgestaltungsansätze in Zeiten von Digitalisierung und KI. Gruppe. Interaktion. Organization. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Organisationspsychologie (GIO), 54(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11612-023-00673-w

Mumford, E. (2000). A Socio-Technical Approach to Systems Design. Requirements Engineering, 5(2), 125–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00010345

Urze, P., Osório, A. L., Afsarmanesh, H. & Camarinha-Matos, L. M. (2020). A Balanced Sociotechnical Framework for Collaborative Networks 4.0. In L. M. Camarinha-Matos, H. Afsarmanesh & A. Ortiz (Hrsg.), IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology. Boosting Collaborative Networks 4.0 (Bd. 598, S. 485–498). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62412-5_40

Prof. Dr. Sabine Seufert
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Systems is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • digital transformation in education
  • generative AI
  • socio-technical system design
  • AI ethics

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

16 pages, 540 KiB  
Article
Student Perceptions of Generative Artificial Intelligence: Investigating Utilization, Benefits, and Challenges in Higher Education
by Ahmad Almassaad, Hayat Alajlan and Reem Alebaikan
Systems 2024, 12(10), 385; https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12100385 - 24 Sep 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 4228
Abstract
This research explores the use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) tools among higher education students in Saudi Arabia, aiming to understand their current perceptions of these technologies. This study utilizes the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and the theory of Task-Technology Fit (TTF) to [...] Read more.
This research explores the use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) tools among higher education students in Saudi Arabia, aiming to understand their current perceptions of these technologies. This study utilizes the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and the theory of Task-Technology Fit (TTF) to examine students’ utilization, perceived benefits, and challenges associated with these tools. A cross-sectional survey was conducted, yielding 859 responses. The findings indicate that 78.7% of students frequently use GenAI tools, while 21.3% do not, often due to a lack of knowledge or interest. ChatGPT emerged as the most widely used GenAI tool, utilized by 86.2% of respondents, followed by other tools like Gemini, Socratic, and CoPilot. Students primarily use these tools for defining or clarifying concepts, translation, generating ideas in writing, and summarizing academic literature. They cite benefits such as ease of access, time-saving, and instant feedback. However, they express concerns about the challenges, including subscription fees, unreliable information, plagiarism, reduced human-to-human interaction, and impacts on learning autonomy. This study underscores the need for increased awareness, ethical guidelines, and robust academic integrity measures to ensure the responsible use of GenAI tools in educational settings. These findings highlight the need for a balanced utilization of GenAI tools in higher education that maximizes benefits while addressing potential challenges and guides the development of policies, curricula, and support systems. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Digital Transformation in Education Systems Integrating Generative AI)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop