Solving Complex Problems, Helping a World in Crisis

A special issue of Societies (ISSN 2075-4698).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (10 March 2021) | Viewed by 11359

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
International Conflict Management, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, GA 30144, USA
Interests: individualism; collectivism; social identity; culture; decision-making

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

COVID-19, racial violence, unemployment, poverty and economic depression, climate change, terrorism, mass migration, and the spread of weapons of mass destruction are among the most visible contemporary global threats that, each by themselves, severely disrupt not only our way of life but potentially also our ability to live. These threats are interconnected; they cause each other and, in combination, magnify their damaging impact on communities, society, international relations, and our ability to live together or, at a minimum, coexist peacefully. Some experts have called these problems “existential threats” ([1] Buzan et al. 1998) that require the use of extraordinary measures to address them. Others refer to these existential threats as intractable or “wicked” problems ([2] Rittel and Webber 1973) that are not easily definable and do not have clear solutions. Complex problems do not occur in a vacuum and, as Rittel and Webber (1973) suggest, “can be considered to be a symptom of another problem” and if the problem is attacked “on too low a level (an increment), then success of resolution may result in making things worse, because it may become more difficult to deal with the higher problems” (p. 165). Complex problems are inextricably interrelated with other complex problems, and may exacerbate existing problems or trigger new ones.

How can we effectively address complex problems? What course(s) of action can or should we take as communities, societies, countries, and with international partners to counter problems that threaten to undermine peace, development, and prosperity for us and future generations? How can we create the conditions that enable every human and our natural and physical environment to flourish? What, if any, are factors that could replace fear with hope for a better future? These are among the questions we seek answers to in this Special Issue of Societies. We invite your contributions that examine all aspects of complex problems and develop recommendations for how to address them locally, domestically, as well as internationally.

Contributions must fit within one of the three categories of papers (article, conceptual paper, or review) of the journal and address the topic of the Special Issue.

References

  1. Buzan, Barry. Ole Waever and Jaap de Wilde. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder, CO and London; Lynne Rienner: Boulder, CO., USA, 1998.
  2. Rittel, Horst and Melvin Webber. Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning. Policy Sciences 1973, 4, 155–169.

Prof. Dr. Volker Franke
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as conceptual papers are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Societies is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

30 pages, 3560 KiB  
Article
The Missing Ingredient for Successful Multi-Stakeholder Partnerships: Cooperative Capacity
by Mary Vayaliparampil, Frank Page and Eric Wolterstorff
Societies 2021, 11(2), 37; https://doi.org/10.3390/soc11020037 - 21 Apr 2021
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 4649
Abstract
Multi-stakeholder partnerships are an essential vehicle for solving complex societal problems. Agreements governing these partnerships often lack equitable partner agency in framing and enforcing multi-stakeholder agreements. This challenges the partner cooperation needed of partnerships to be effective. This theoretical paper introduces a new [...] Read more.
Multi-stakeholder partnerships are an essential vehicle for solving complex societal problems. Agreements governing these partnerships often lack equitable partner agency in framing and enforcing multi-stakeholder agreements. This challenges the partner cooperation needed of partnerships to be effective. This theoretical paper introduces a new original model to measure and develop the cooperative capacity of multi-stakeholder partnerships so that future agreements involving the partnership are framed to share governance equitably among all partners and hence, increase partnership performance and effectiveness. The model provides a methodology to measure and develop the cooperative capacity of multi-stakeholder partnerships through key performance indicators that identify the cooperative state of partners and predicts partnership effectiveness in achieving common goals. The paper traces the theoretical genesis of the model, presents a comprehensive explanation of the model, and provides cases of the model’s application. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Solving Complex Problems, Helping a World in Crisis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 586 KiB  
Article
Optimism and Social Resilience: Social Isolation, Meaninglessness, Trust, and Empathy in Times of COVID-19
by Volker C. Franke and Charles N. Elliott
Societies 2021, 11(2), 35; https://doi.org/10.3390/soc11020035 - 14 Apr 2021
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 6010
Abstract
Using the COVID-19 pandemic as an example of an existential threat, we conducted a nationwide survey in March 2020 asking 445 Americans about their hopes and fears, their opinions about the coronavirus pandemic, and their attitudes for getting through the public health crisis. [...] Read more.
Using the COVID-19 pandemic as an example of an existential threat, we conducted a nationwide survey in March 2020 asking 445 Americans about their hopes and fears, their opinions about the coronavirus pandemic, and their attitudes for getting through the public health crisis. In the present research, we examine the coronavirus pandemic as a complex problem and explore its effects on respondents’ levels of optimism to resolve the public health crisis. While much existing research examines the influence of risk perception on optimism, we specifically measure how respondents’ levels of empathy and trust affect social resilience and relate to hopes and fears for their personal health and public health in the United States. Specifically, we examine respondents’ levels of trust in government and their neighbors as well as their levels of empathy, alienation, and social isolation. Our research confirmed the importance of empathy to counter the spread of the virus while preventing economic collapse. In addition, we found that relational factors such as alienation and trust affect individuals’ levels of optimism or pessimism for getting through the public health crisis. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Solving Complex Problems, Helping a World in Crisis)
Back to TopTop