Digital Justice and the Socio-Economic Fabric: Localized Equity Practices Versus Global Techno-Governance

A special issue of Societies (ISSN 2075-4698).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 1 December 2026 | Viewed by 2784

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Faculty of Law, University of Coimbra, 3004-531 Coimbra, Portugal
Interests: public administration; public policy; data analysis; statistics; law
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail
Guest Editor
Master’s Program in Law and the Judiciary, National School for the Training and Improvement of Magistrates, Brasília, Brazil
Interests: law; public administration; administration of justice; public policy; justice systems; digital justice
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Institute of Preparation for General Administration (IPAG) and Poitiers Economics Lab (LEP), University of Poitiers, 86073 Poitiers, France
Interests: economics; public administration; delegation to independent agencies; regulation and regulatory capture

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Contemporary societies find themselves at a critical juncture where digital technologies fundamentally reshape the landscape of justice, equity, and socio-economic relations. This transformation has created unprecedented tensions between localized efforts to promote digital equity and the increasingly dominant paradigms of global techno-governance, generating complex challenges for both practitioners and scholars seeking to understand and navigate this evolving terrain.

Digital justice emerges as a critical framework for examining how technological systems either perpetuate or dismantle existing inequalities within the socio-economic fabric of communities. This concept encompasses not merely access to digital tools, but the broader questions of who controls digital infrastructure, how algorithmic decision-making affects marginalized populations, and whether technological solutions can meaningfully address systemic inequities. At its core, digital justice represents an extension of social justice principles into the digital realm, demanding that we interrogate power structures embedded within technological systems.

The tension between localized equity practices and global techno-governance reveals a fundamental paradox of our time. While communities develop grassroots initiatives, participatory technology design, and locally responsive digital inclusion programmes, they simultaneously operate within ecosystems dominated by transnational corporations, standardized platforms, and governance frameworks that often prioritize efficiency and scalability over equity and local autonomy. This creates a dynamic where well-intentioned local interventions may be constrained or undermined by broader structural forces beyond community control.

Recent scholarship and empirical evidence demonstrate the multidimensional nature of this challenge. Digital justice intersects with numerous domains including data sovereignty and privacy rights; algorithmic bias and automated decision-making; digital labor and platform economics; smart city governance and surveillance; financial technology and digital banking access; educational technology and the digital divide; healthcare digitization and telemedicine equity; civic participation and e-governance; artificial intelligence ethics and community involvement; and cybersecurity and digital rights protection.

This Special Issue seeks original, rigorous, and innovative contributions that grapple with these complexities, addressing the central question: how can localized equity practices effectively challenge, negotiate with, or transform global techno-governance structures to advance digital justice and strengthen the socio-economic fabric of communities?

Contributions have to follow one of the three categories of papers (article, conceptual paper or review) of the journal and address the topic of the Special Issue.

Dr. Pedro Miguel Alves Ribeiro Correia
Dr. Fabrício Castagna Lunardi
Dr. Adriano do Vale
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as conceptual papers are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Societies is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • digital justice
  • digital equity
  • techno-governance
  • socio-economic fabric
  • localized equity practices
  • algorithmic bias
  • digital divide
  • data sovereignty
  • platform economics
  • smart cities
  • digital rights
  • community technology
  • digital inclusion

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

23 pages, 335 KB  
Article
Access to Justice for Women Victims of Domestic Violence in Brazil: Analysis and Categorization of Policies
by Gabrielle Tatith Pereira, Fabrício Castagna Lunardi, Pedro Miguel Alves Ribeiro Correia and Adriano do Vale
Societies 2026, 16(5), 144; https://doi.org/10.3390/soc16050144 - 27 Apr 2026
Viewed by 220
Abstract
Domestic violence against women is a severe problem in Brazil and worldwide. The Brazilian system presents innovative policies aimed at women’s access to justice, which have not yet been systematized or empirically examined. This article aims to identify, analyze, and categorize the main [...] Read more.
Domestic violence against women is a severe problem in Brazil and worldwide. The Brazilian system presents innovative policies aimed at women’s access to justice, which have not yet been systematized or empirically examined. This article aims to identify, analyze, and categorize the main policies for access to justice for victims of domestic violence in Brazil. Methods used are documentary analysis and data collection were conducted. Data were requested from public institutions and collected from 27 state governments and the federal government. As results, the research found that, in addition to access to justice policies commonly adopted worldwide—such as emergency protective measures, risk assessment forms, call centers for women, and panic buttons, Brazil has implemented several innovations, particularly: (i) multidisciplinary care centers, (ii) specialized police stations, (iii) shelters and rental assistance, (iv) employment quotas, (v) special pensions for orphans, and (vi) aesthetic repair. In conclusion: (i) the ten public policies are effective and have benefited millions of women in Brazil; (ii) there is a need to coordinate these policies, assess their effectiveness, and consolidate data; (iii) new technologies offer opportunities to develop tools that facilitate access to justice and prevent and redress domestic violence; and (iv) these policies may be adopted by other countries, with appropriate contextual adaptations. Full article
42 pages, 2935 KB  
Article
EcoTechnoPolitics: Towards Planetary Thinking Beyond Digital–Green Twin Transitions
by Igor Calzada and Itziar Eizaguirre
Societies 2026, 16(2), 57; https://doi.org/10.3390/soc16020057 - 11 Feb 2026
Viewed by 1107
Abstract
This article advances EcoTechnoPolitics as a transformational conceptual and policy recommendation framework for hybridizing digital–green twin transitions under conditions of planetary polycrises. It responds to growing concerns that dominant policy approaches by supranational institutions—including the EU, UN, OECD, World Bank Group, WEF, and [...] Read more.
This article advances EcoTechnoPolitics as a transformational conceptual and policy recommendation framework for hybridizing digital–green twin transitions under conditions of planetary polycrises. It responds to growing concerns that dominant policy approaches by supranational institutions—including the EU, UN, OECD, World Bank Group, WEF, and G20—remain institutionally siloed, technologically reductionist, and insufficiently attentive to ecological constraints. Moving beyond the prevailing digital–green twin transitions paradigm, the article coins EcoTechnoPolitics around three hypotheses: the need for planetary thinking grounded in (i) anticipatory governance, (ii) hybridization, and (iii) a transformational agenda beyond cosmetic digital–green alignment. The research question asks how EcoTechnoPolitics can enable planetary thinking beyond digital–green twin transitions under ecological and technological constraints. Methodologically, the study triangulates (i) an interdisciplinary literature review with (ii) a place-based analysis of two socially cohesive city-regions—the Basque Country and Portland (Oregon)—and (iii) a macro-level policy analysis of supranational digital and green governance frameworks. The results show that, despite planetary rhetoric around sustainability and digitalization, prevailing policy architectures largely externalize ecological costs and consolidate technological power. Building on this analysis, the discussion formulates transformational policy recommendations. The conclusion argues that governing planetary-scale ecotechnopolitical systems requires embedding ecological responsibility within technological governance. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop