Religion and Violence in South Asia

A special issue of Religions (ISSN 2077-1444).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 1 September 2026 | Viewed by 532

Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of History, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX, USA
Interests: Indian independence movement; Mahatma Gandhi and non-violent resistance; environmental and religious history; the Ganges River; Pandit Madan Mohan Malaviya

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Religions would like to introduce a special issue on Religion and Violence in South Asia, a region that has been of great historical impact and that continues to grow in global importance today. The topic is of grave concern as the world is now being pushed to the brink of an existential crisis by the ravages of violence on our own and other species that is a direct result of exploitation, irrationalism, authoritarianism, and intolerance. Ideas and goals that were once considered universal goods, such as globalism, environmentalism, care for the disadvantaged and oppressed, and tolerance are now seen as threats to anthropocentric, nationalistic, ethnic, racial, and social hierarchies and dominance. Walls have been raised, human rights trampled, and the ghoulish grasp of genocide has emerged from the depths of anger and revenge. The post-Holocaust motto of “Never Again,” has been changed to “Never Again is Now.” Religion, a source of meaning and comfort to billions of the planet’s people, has in many cases been used a justification, a banner under which its adherents are compelled to engage in various forms of violence, from the withering of human rights and environmental protections, to outright murder. Religious myths that celebrate the defeat of good over evil, light over darkness, have been appropriated to demonize and dehumanize people of other faiths, political parties, and lifestyles. All is not lost, though.

There are still many antidotes to the ills of our planet. Among these, academic research, analysis, interpretation, theory, and debate can and do contribute to mutual understanding. It is vital for people of different cultures and perceptions of religion to come together to engage scholarship of the highest standards to continue the task of explaining the role of religion in violence, as well as the role of violence in religion. Often it is easier to gain insights into one’s own culture by studying others.  To this end, Religions will zoom into South Asia, an area of the world that has both been challenged by religious violence, but that has also brought forth solutions to violence with Mahatma Gandhi’s redeeming concept of non-violent action for political and social change.

This special edition of Religions encourages paper submissions from variety of disciplines and perspectives relating to the topic of Religion and Violence in South Asia. Suggested themes include religious nationalism, majoritarian politics, politicalization of religious identity, rape myths and gender violence, impact of religious tensions on regional stability and geopolitics, caste hierarchies, the role of social media and disinformation, impacts of colonialism, environmental degradation, as well as religious solutions and other interventions against violence.

We request that, prior to submitting a manuscript, interested authors initially submit a proposed title and an abstract of 200-300 words summarizing their intended contribution. Please send it to the Guest Editor, Dr. Leah M. Renold, at lr22@txstate.edu or leahrenold@txstate.edu, and cc the Assistant Editor of Religions, Clare Chai, at clare.chai@mdpi.com. Abstracts will be reviewed by the Guest Editors for the purposes of ensuring proper fit within the scope of the special issue. Full manuscripts will undergo double-blind peer review.

We look forward to receiving your contributions.

Dr. Leah M. Renold
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-anonymized peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Religions is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • religion
  • violence
  • communalism
  • myth
  • nationalism
  • Hindutva
  • dehumanization

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

19 pages, 344 KB  
Article
Compassion, Classification, Closure: Media Discourse and the Regime of Truth of India’s Citizenship Amendment Act
by Zhou Li and Zhaoshuai Gong
Religions 2026, 17(8), 929; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel17080929 - 5 Aug 2026
Viewed by 97
Abstract
India’s 2019 Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) made religion a criterion for expedited naturalization, granting a fast track to citizenship for non-Muslim migrants from three Muslim-majority countries while excluding Muslims. This article examines how such a law came to be normalized in public discourse. [...] Read more.
India’s 2019 Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) made religion a criterion for expedited naturalization, granting a fast track to citizenship for non-Muslim migrants from three Muslim-majority countries while excluding Muslims. This article examines how such a law came to be normalized in public discourse. Analyzing 60 articles published between December 2019 and December 2024 in three influential English-language media outlets—The Times of India, The Wire, and Organiser—the article examines how the CAA was made to appear legitimate, even as its religious logic remained contested. Drawing on Foucault’s concept of “regime of truth,” it identifies three interrelated mechanisms through which this normalization occurred. First, humanitarian appeals and civilizational narratives created a hierarchy of suffering that made some lives more visible and grievable than others. Second, this hierarchy was recast in administrative terms, presenting religious exclusion as a matter of procedure rather than politics. Third, dissent was narrowed through prohibition, epistemic disqualification, and the privileging of authorized knowledge. Religion, in this process, was discursively reconfigured as a humanitarian criterion, civilizational claim, administrative category, and security marker. The article finally reveals that the CAA’s religious logic was normalized through the seemingly secular languages of law, governance, and compassion. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Religion and Violence in South Asia)
Back to TopTop