Biosecurity in Poultry

A special issue of Poultry (ISSN 2674-1164).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 30 June 2026 | Viewed by 1614

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of Perugia, 06100 Perugia, Italy
Interests: poultry; infectious diseases; immunosuppressive disease; neoplastic diseases; antibiotic resistance; intestinal microflora (poultry); probiotics
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Milan, 26900 Lodi, Italy
Interests: poultry; poultry diseases; infectious diseases; zoonoses; public health

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Biosecurity in industrial poultry is considered one of the most important tools for preventing the introduction, development, and spread of both infectious and non-infectious diseases. It aims at promoting animal welfare through the proper and rational application of management practices throughout the entire poultry production chain: from hatchery, which represents the starting point to farming up to the end product.

This Special Issue welcomes original articles and relevant reviews focusing on all subjects and management practises dealing with biosecurity from practical application up to legal considerations, feeding strategies, genetic selection, and advancements in diagnostics (as well as advances in poultry vaccination, since the flock immunity is the corner stone to cope disease occurrence).

Dr. Maria Pia Franciosini
Dr. Grilli Guido
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Poultry is an international peer-reviewed open access quarterly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1200 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • poultry
  • feeding
  • biosecurity
  • farming
  • hatchery
  • diagnostics

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

20 pages, 914 KB  
Article
Biosecurity Gaps and Food Production Practices in Subsistence and Differentiated Backyard Poultry Systems in Central Chile
by Víctor Marambio, Francisca Di Pillo, Cecilia Baumberger, Cristobal Oyarzún, Pablo Galdames, Tamara Palma, Pedro Jimenez-Bluhm, Javiera Cornejo, Stacey Schultz-Cherry and Christopher Hamilton-West
Poultry 2025, 4(4), 46; https://doi.org/10.3390/poultry4040046 - 30 Sep 2025
Viewed by 1084
Abstract
Backyard poultry systems (BPS) are the most widespread form of animal production worldwide, contributing to household economies and improving food availability. However, limited biosecurity measures and close human–animal interactions raise concerns regarding zoonotic disease transmission. In recent years, consumer-driven motivations have given rise [...] Read more.
Backyard poultry systems (BPS) are the most widespread form of animal production worldwide, contributing to household economies and improving food availability. However, limited biosecurity measures and close human–animal interactions raise concerns regarding zoonotic disease transmission. In recent years, consumer-driven motivations have given rise to non-traditional BPS with differential attributes (BPS-DA), yet there is limited knowledge about their food production practices. This study aimed to characterize and compare practices across 25 BPS and 25 BPS-DA in the Metropolitan Region using surveys, interviews, and direct observations of egg collections and poultry slaughters. Eggs were the main animal product in both systems, with women primarily responsible for care. Poultry slaughter was reported exclusively in BPS (60%), generally performed under inadequate hygienic conditions and without veterinary oversight. These practices, (poultry slaughter, food production and handling), may considerably increase the risk of human exposure to zoonotic pathogens, such as avian influenza viruses. In contrast, BPS-DA prioritized birds as companion animals (60%), free-range rearing (68%), and hobby-based production (80%). While both systems showed limited biosecurity, significant differences were found in the use of dedicated footwear (p = 0.01; V = 0.35), egg collection sites (p = 0.04; V = 0.29), and refrigeration (p = 0.004; V = 0.41). Veterinary access was limited in both (32% in BPS; 44% in BPS-DA). These findings highlight critical gaps in health management and underscore the need for context-specific educational and regulatory strategies for safer backyard poultry production. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biosecurity in Poultry)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop