Philology + : The Renewal of Anglo-Saxon Literary and Cultural Studies

A special issue of Humanities (ISSN 2076-0787).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 June 2019) | Viewed by 4052

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Wheaton College, 26 E. Main St., Norton, MA 02766, USA
Interests: Old and Middle English language and literature; fantasy; science fiction; J.R.R. Tolkien

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

This special issue of humanities will spotlight innovative scholarship that uses improved or augmented philological methods to address literary, cultural, historical or political questions in Anglo-Saxon studies.

Although the discipline of Philology was never entirely abandoned by Anglo-Saxonists, the entanglement of supposedly objective philological knowledge with nationalist politics, and the humanities’ general turn towards more abstract theory in the final third of the twentieth century, combined, ironically, with the success of many long-term philological projects—dictionaries, grammars, editions, translations—reduced the visibility of approaches that are substantially focused on the detailed, technical analysis of formal features of texts such as vocabulary, dialect, syntax, orthography, and meter.

But during this time when Philology may have seemed less central to Old English studies, scholars were quietly rebuilding the discipline: tempering the more extreme claims to certainty, updating Philology to take account of modern Linguistics, completing and then revising the major projects, and weeding out the prejudices, conjectures and desires that had been misidentified as facts. In recent years, this intellectual renewal has combined with innovations in digital methods, increased cross-disciplinary communication, and vastly improved access to electronic manuscript images, textual corpora, and scholarly archives. Contemporary scholars can now do things that early philologists only dreamed of, opening up whole new channels of knowledge from the past and enabling research that crosses cultural, linguistic, temporal, and disciplinary boundaries in ways that have never before been possible. We are witnessing the beginnings of discipline’s rebirth.

The focus of this special issue will be research that participates in this philological renewal of Anglo-Saxon studies, particularly papers that demonstrate ways of using digital tools and electronic resources to identify new questions or to revisit old ones. Reconsideration of the work of early philologists that leads to the recovery and improvement of forgotten insights is also very welcome.

Prof. Michael D. C. Drout
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Humanities is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Anglo-Saxon literature
  • Anglo-Saxon culture
  • Old English language
  • Old English literature
  • Philology
  • digital humanities
  • methodology
  • manuscripts
  • medieval studies

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

23 pages, 5381 KiB  
Article
The Composite Nature of Andreas
by David Maddock
Humanities 2019, 8(3), 130; https://doi.org/10.3390/h8030130 - 31 Jul 2019
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 3504
Abstract
Scholars of the Old English poem Andreas have long debated its dating and authorship, as the poem shares affinities both with Beowulf and the signed poems of Cynewulf. Although this debate hinges on poetic style and other internal evidence, the stylistic uniformity of [...] Read more.
Scholars of the Old English poem Andreas have long debated its dating and authorship, as the poem shares affinities both with Beowulf and the signed poems of Cynewulf. Although this debate hinges on poetic style and other internal evidence, the stylistic uniformity of Andreas has not been suitably demonstrated. This paper investigates this question by examining the distribution of oral-formulaic data within the poem, which is then correlated to word frequency and orthographic profiles generated with lexomic techniques. The analysis identifies an earlier version of the poem, which has been expanded by a later poet. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop