European Burn Journal

Inhalation injury (II) exacerbates burn mortality via obstructive fibrin casts. We evaluated a protocol combining scheduled flexible bronchoscopy (FOB) with nebulized heparin and N-acetylcysteine (NAC). This single-center, randomized controlled trial enrolled 76 mechanically ventilated adult burn patients with bronchoscopically confirmed II. The intervention (n = 38) comprised a 7-day protocol of scheduled FOB with alternating nebulized heparin (5000 IU) and 20% NAC every 4 h. Controls (n = 38) received standard care with on-demand FOB. Primary outcomes were 28-day mortality and day-7 Lung Injury Score (LIS). Unadjusted 28-day mortality was lower in the intervention group (57.9% vs. 81.6%; p = 0.025), alongside a decreased median day-7 LIS (1.0 vs. 1.38; p = 0.021). Respiratory mechanics improved significantly, demonstrating reduced driving pressure and increased static compliance (p < 0.001). However, in multivariable Cox regression, baseline injury severity independently predicted mortality, while the intervention indicated a non-significant hazard reduction trend (aHR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.36–1.23). No systemic anticoagulation occurred. In conclusion, scheduled FOB with nebulized heparin and NAC improves respiratory mechanics and attenuates lung injury in II. Although unadjusted mortality decreased, baseline severity remains the primary mortality driver, suggesting this protocol is a physiologically beneficial adjunct requiring further multicenter validation. Trial registration: Thai Clinical Trials Registry, TCTR20260408001 (retrospectively registered).

Background: Evaporative water loss from burn wounds is a major but often neglected component of early fluid requirements. Despite its physiological importance, no dedicated review has quantified acute post-burn evaporative water loss (TEWL) and its interaction with modern resuscitation strategies in over 40 years. Recent mass-casualty burn events in specialized centers have re-emphasized the clinical importance of accurate early fluid balance, which is particularly challenging. Methods: A scoping review (PRISMA-ScR) of historical quantitative studies and 23 contemporary (2015–2025) adult major-burn resuscitation cohorts was conducted. Expected TEWL was derived from Lamke benchmarks; interstitial edema was estimated from the only available regression of simultaneous fluid input and 24 h weight change. A novel TEWL/edema ratio was tested against resuscitation volume (mL/kg/%TBSA) and the established input/output (I/O) ratio. Results: In the acute phase, the median TEWL normalized to total body surface area was 71 mL/m²/h [52–79 mL/m²/h], allowing for calculation of the TEWL/edema ratio. The TEWL/edema ratio was inversely correlated with the resuscitation fluid dose (R² = 0.811) and the I/O ratio as well (R² = 0.86), crossing unity at 2.85 mL/kg/%TBSA. A ratio > 1 signals high evaporative drive and/or possible under-resuscitation; a ratio < 1 alerts to fluid creep before significant weight gain. Conclusions: The TEWL/edema ratio is the first physiology-grounded, easily calculable resuscitation endpoint that complements urine output by providing insight into whether administered fluid is lost as obligatory evaporation or sequestered as edema. Routine estimation of expected TEWL and early monitoring of the TEWL/edema ratio may help guide goal-directed burn resuscitation, especially when early excision is delayed or impossible. Given the substantial inter-individual variability, the ratio derived from aggregate data should not be interpreted as a patient-specific predictor.

While the global surgeon deficit continues to demand urgent action, traditional “over-the-shoulder” teaching is increasingly constrained by infection-control demands and crowded operating rooms. Over the past four years, we integrated head-mounted smart cameras into reconstructive-surgery workshops across East Africa. Utilizing voice-controlled, stabilized video technology, we provided trainees with a high-definition, wearer’s-perspective view that enhanced visualization without compromising the sterile field. Following remarkably high acceptance in Africa, we have initiated a pilot study at the National Burn Centre in Sweden to apply these lessons to a high-income setting. Our findings suggest that this technology improves surgical education while supporting infection-control stewardship through reduced overcrowding. This experience illustrates a reverse innovation, where tools refined under the logistical constraints of African operating theatres offer scalable solutions for universal challenges in surgical training and patient safety.