Next Article in Journal
Housefly Maggot Meal as a Potent Bioresource for Fish Feed to Facilitate Early Gonadal Development in Clarias gariepinus (Burchell,1822)
Previous Article in Journal
Numerical Study on Performance Optimization of an Energy-Saving Insulated Window
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Statistically Validated Component- and Indicator-Level Requirements for Sustainable Thai Homestay Businesses

by
Nawhath Thanvisitthpon
Department of Architectural Technology, Rajamangala University of Technology Thanyaburi, Phathumthani 12110, Thailand
Sustainability 2021, 13(2), 936; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020936
Submission received: 23 December 2020 / Revised: 10 January 2021 / Accepted: 13 January 2021 / Published: 18 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Tourism, Culture, and Heritage)

Abstract

:
This research proposes an updated version of homestay indicators for 10 existing component-level homestay requirements. The updated indicators were aimed to replace the decade-old original indicators for Thai homestay businesses. Besides, the 31 original homestay indictors were not statistically validated. In this study, structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to determine the statistical relevancy between the updated homestay indicators and the components. The SEM analysis involved two steps: exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The EFA statistically regrouped the 31 updated indictors by six new homestay components. The six components and 31 updated indicators were further validated by CFA to determine the factor loadings and statistical reliability of the components and indicators. The factor loadings indicate the levels of importance that homestay guests attach to different homestay components and indicators. Therefore, Thai homestay operators should give priority to the components and indicators with high factor loadings.

1. Introduction

Tourism and hospitality are a major contributor to Thailand’s economy, with tourism revenue accounting for 17.7% of the country’s gross domestic product (GDP) (Ministry of Tourism and Sports, 2019). Thailand is renowned for unique cultures, traditional cuisine, and beautiful nature [1]. Homestay is a form of hospitality and lodging where guests or visitors are afforded with opportunities to observe and experience local culture and ways of life, in addition to accommodation and basic amenities [2].
Homestay tourism offers visitors the opportunity to learn and experience local ways of life and cultures (Oranratmanee [3]. To be attractive and sustainable, homestay operation should be of small scale, flexible, and run by local community members. The determinants of the success and sustainability of homestay businesses include, e.g., homestay host family, authenticity, safety, location, accommodation, and activities [4].
According to Kontogeorgopoulos, Churyen [5], homestay is a means to monetize unused space in places of residence for economic return. In addition, homestay is a form of accommodation that combines the experiences of a family member’s home and conventional lodging facilities. A study by Takran, Chartrungruang [6] found that a majority of native homestay operators failed to meet the minimum requirements or standards of homestay business due to limited access to relevant information sources.
Homestay tourism contributes to local economic betterment and strengthens social capital of the local community [7]. From the perspective of homestay guests, homestay tourism provides them with opportunities to learn and experience firsthand local cultures, customs, and livelihoods. According to Jiang [8], local cultures and ways of life play an essential role in homestay tourism development.
Cultural resources are part of the cultural heritage of destinations and are largely related to customary practices, livelihoods, and local identity [9]. Meanwhile, tourism is largely viewed as a leisure-related activity separate from local culture and traditional ways of life [10,11]. However, recent decades have witnessed the convergence of culture and tourism (i.e., culture-oriented homestay tourism) as cultural heritage has been increasingly used as unique selling propositions to attract travelers to the tourist destinations [11].
Homestay tourism is a source of income for local community members, especially in destinations with unique attractions or cultures [12]. Homestay tourism increasingly emphasizes the preservation of local ecosystems and ways of life of community members [13]. Besides, homestay tourism satisfies the unique needs of travelers who prioritize quality over quantity. Travelers increasingly attach more importance to local culture and ecosystem [14]. Active participation of local community members in homestay tourism operation and management contributes to inclusive local economic development [15].
However, if improperly regulated, homestay tourism could have negative impacts on local communities and the environment [16,17]. As a result, the Ministry of Tourism and Sports of Thailand in 2011 introduced the homestay requirements or standards for Thai homestay businesses. The homestay requirements are instrumental for preservation of local ways of life and the environment [18]. The standards also provide homestay operators with guidelines to streamline the operation and administration of homestays [19,20].
The success and sustainability of homestay businesses are largely determined by the extent to which the homestay operators meet the basic requirements or standards, such as authenticity, safety, location, activities. As a result, the standards for homestay businesses would serve as a guideline for homestay operators with regard to basic requirements and expectations of homestay guests. The standards also promote collaboration between diverse groups of stakeholders [21,22].
The homestay standard of the Ministry of Tourism and Sports consists of 10 components and 31 indicators. However, the existing indicators were not statistically validated to determine their relevancy to the components. As a result, this research proposes updated homestay indicators, and statistical validation was carried out by using exploratory factor analysis. The homestay components and indicators were further validated by confirmatory factor analysis to determine the factor loadings and statistical reliability. In this research, factor loadings indicate the levels of importance that homestay guests attach to different homestay components and indicators.

2. Research Methodology

Table 1 tabulates the component- and indicator-level standards or requirements for homestay businesses in Thailand by the Ministry of Tourism and Sports. There are 10 component-level requirements and 31 related indicator-level requirements (i.e., original indicators). The 10 components include accommodation and amenities; food and beverage; safety to life and belongings; hospitality of host and family members; travel information and tour guide; natural resources and the environment; cultural heritage and livelihood; addition of value to local merchandise; homestay operation and management; marketing communication and promotion.
The original homestay indicators have been in use for nearly a decade (since 2011). Given rapid technological advancements and changes in travelers’ preferences over the past decade, modifications are necessary to remain relevant. Moreover, no statistical validation was carried out on the 31 original indicators to determine their relevancy to the 10 components.
As a result, this research proposes an updated version of homestay indicators (31 updated indicators) for 10 component-level requirements (Table 1). In the study, the updated indicators were transformed into a 31-question questionnaire (Appendix A) and validated with 337 Thai and international guests of homestays across Thailand. The questionnaire respondents were guests of a random sample of 12 homestays, all of which met the ministry’s homestay standards. According to Dawson, Peppe [23], a proper sample size should be at least 10 times the total number of questions. Given that the number of questions was 31, the sample size was thus 337 homestay guests. The data collection was conducted by homestay operators between March and May 2018, which coincided with Songkran water festival in Thailand. Songkran marks the beginning of the traditional Thai New Year and the celebration covers a period of three days: 13–15 April.
In data collection, respondents were asked by homestay operators for their views on the importance of different updated indicators for the success of homestays, based on a 5-point Likert scale where 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively, denote unimportant, of little importance, moderately important, important, and very important. According to Bayraktar, Tatoglu [24]; Na-nan, Chaiprasit [25]; Ismail Salaheldin [26]; Thanvisitthpon, Shrestha [27], a measure scale could be used with self-assessment questions.
Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to determine the statistical relevancy between the updated homestay indicators and the 10 component-level requirements. The SEM analysis involved two steps: exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). In this study, the EFA statistically regrouped the 31 updated indictors by six new homestay components rather than by the original 10 components (Table 2 and Table 3).
The six new components and 31 updated indicators were further validated by CFA to determine the factor loadings and reliability of the components and indicators (Table 4). Factor loadings indicate the levels of importance that homestay guests attach to different homestay components and indicators. A high factor loading suggests that the component or indicator plays an important role in the success and sustainability of homestays.

3. Results and Discussion

Table 2 tabulates the EFA results and component-based factor weight scores of the 31 updated homestay indicators. The updated indicators were regrouped by six EFA-validated homestay components. The 1st component consisted of six updated indictors: A1, S2, T2, C2, M4, and P2 with the factor weight scores of 0.762-0.976. The 2nd component consisted of six indictors: A2, S1, T1, C1, M3, and P1 (0.666–0.933), and the 3rd component comprised five indicators: R1, T3, V1, M1, and M5 (0.858–0.949). The 4th, 5th, and 6th components consisted of A3, F1, F3, N2, N4 (0.749–0.919); A4, F2, F4, N1, N3 (0.691–0.927); and R2, V2, M2, M6 (0.876–0.941), respectively. The descriptions of the updated indicators are provided in Table 1.
The factor weight scores of the 31 updated homestay indicators were greater than 0.3, given that a factor weight score >0.3 is statistically valid [57,58,59,60]. The eigenvalues of the revised six components were 6.186, 4.610, 3.997, 3.645, 3.251, and 2.666, respectively, given that an eigenvalue > 1.0 is acceptable, with the corresponding percentage of variance of 19.955, 14.872, 12.894, 11.758, 10.487, and 8.599. Table 3 presents the six EFA-validated homestay components and indicators.
In Figure 1, the factor loadings of six validated homestay components and 31 updated indicators were 0.338–0.454 and 0.554–0.993, respectively. According to Kim and Mueller [74], a factor loading greater than 0.3 is statistically significant.
In addition, the chi-square = 10901.185, degree of freedom (df) = 465, p = 0.000, goodness of fit index (GFI) = 0.900, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.047, adjusted goodness of fit index (AGFI) = 0.963, NFI Deltal1 = 0.943, confirmatory fit index (CFI) = 0.975, incremental fit index (IFI) = 0.975, Tucker–Lewis index (TLI) = 0.967, and root mean square residue (RMR) = 0.034. According to Baumgartner and Homburg [75], Gatignon [76] and Hooper, Coughlan [77], GFI, AGFI, NFI Deltal1, CFI, IFI, and TLI should be close to 1, while RMSEA and RMR should not exceed 0.05.
Table 4 presents the CFA results of the six validated components and 31 updated homestay indicators. The reliability (R2) of the indicators under the 1st component were 0.444–0.986, and those under the 2nd component were 0.307–0.907. The R2 of the indicators under 3rd and 4th components were 0.608–0.965 and 0.515–0.943. The R2 of the indictors under 5th and 6th components were 0.435–0.961 and 0.731–0.873, given that R2 > 0.3 is statistically acceptable. The full descriptions of the updated indicators were provided in Table 3.
The composite reliability (CR) of component 6 (stakeholder involvement strategy) was the largest (0.955), followed by component 1 (congruence with local ways of life and inclusive local economic development; 0.953), component 3 (roles of local stakeholders in homestay tourism longevity; 0.948), component 4 (cleanliness, infrastructure, and the environment; 0.940), component 5 (identity and carrying capacity of homestay; 0.931), and component 2 (homestay operation and hospitality management; 0.926). The corresponding average variance extracted (AVE) was 0.678–0.841. According to Fornell and Larcker [78], the CFA construct component is statistically valid if CR > 0.6 or AVE > 0.5.
A high factor loading indicates the indicator that homestay guests attach considerable importance and thereby plays a crucial role in the success and sustainability of local homestay businesses. In Figure 1, the indicator C2 (action plans to preserve traditional livelihoods and local ways of life) under component 1 had the highest factor loading (0.993). Specifically, local ways of life and cultures of tourist destinations have been increasingly adopted as a differentiation strategy by many homestay businesses [33,62,64]. Culture-oriented homestay tourism helps promote local culture and traditions and is a potential source of income of local community, which in turn supports and strengthens cultural production and creativity [44,47,48].
The indicator V1 (availability of a wide selection of local merchandise for sale to visitors, and the offerings should be diverse to minimize price competition) under component 3 had the second highest factor loading (0.982). Culture-oriented homestay tourism promotes local traditions and also serves as a marketing tool to sell locally made crafts and services to visitors [66,79]. As a result, an increasing number of local tourist destinations integrate local cultures into their offerings and services to appeal to visitors’ unique needs [49,50].

4. Conclusions and Recommendations

This research proposed an updated version of homestay indicators associated with 10 component-level homestay requirements to replace the 31 original indicators for homestay businesses in Thailand. The original indictors have been in use for nearly a decade, and no statistical validation was carried out to determine the relevancy to the 10 components. The existing 10 components were accommodation and amenities; food and beverage; safety to life and belongings; hospitality of host and family members; travel information and tour guide; natural resources and the environment; cultural heritage and livelihood; addition of value to local merchandise; homestay operation and management; marketing communication and promotion.
Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to determine the statistical relevancy between the updated homestay indicators and the components. The SEM analysis involved two steps: exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). In this research, the EFA statistically regrouped the 31 updated indictors by six new homestay components instead of by the original 10 components. The six new homestay components were congruence with local ways of life and inclusive local economic development; homestay operation and hospitality management; roles of local stakeholders in homestay tourism longevity; cleanliness, infrastructure, and the environment; local identity and carrying capacity of homestay; stakeholder involvement strategy.
The six components and 31 updated indicators were further validated by CFA to determine the factor loadings and reliability of the components and indicators. A high factor loading suggests that the particular indicator plays an important role in the success and sustainability of homestay tourism and local community. The CFA results revealed that the indicators C2 (action plans to preserve traditional livelihoods and local ways of life) and V1 (availability of a wide selection of local merchandise for sale to visitors, and the offerings should be diverse to minimize price competition) had the highest (0.993) and second-highest factor loadings (0.982).
The findings indicated that homestay guests attached considerable importance to both homestay indicators. As a result, Thai homestay operators should take into consideration local cultures and ways of life in the formulation and implementation of their business plans. Furthermore, the research findings are consistent with [33,62,64], who found that homestay businesses increasingly adopt the local ways of life and cultures as the differentiation strategy to attract visitors. The findings are also consistent with [44,47,48], who reported that culture-oriented homestay tourism helps promote local culture and traditions and is a potential source of income of local community.
The research findings are expected to contribute to improvement in homestay operation in Thailand as the owners could refer to the resulting factor loadings to identify the requirements or standards that are currently inadequate or lacking in their homestay operation. The shortcomings could then be addressed by immediate and long-term action plans, with priority given to the homestay indicators with high factor loadings. Moreover, the statistically validated homestay indicators could be further developed into a standardized checklist to evaluate and grade homestay businesses in terms of the extent to which they satisfy the homestay standards.
In this current research, the homestay indicators were validated by using a sample of 337 homestay visitors who stayed in a homestay in the central region of Thailand. To address the issue of limited geography, future research will cover several geographical regions and longer periods of data collection (from three months to one year). In addition, future participating homestay operators will be offered a brief training session to avoid incomplete and incorrect data collection.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Appendix A. Thai Homestay Business Indicator Satisfactions

Appendix A.1. Demographics and Generic Information

1.1. Gender
  ▯ Male
  ▯ Female
1.2. Age (years)
1.3. Education level
  ▯ Below primary
  ▯ Primary school
  ▯ Lower Secondary
  ▯ Upper secondary
  ▯ University
1.4. Occupation
  ▯ Private company employee
  ▯ Self-employed
  ▯ Student
  ▯ Government
  ▯ Business owner
  ▯ Other

Appendix A.2. Thai Homestay Business Indicator Satisfactions

The Thai hmestay business indicator satisfactions have an 5-point Likert scale, 1 represents not related, 5 strongly disagree, and 10 strongly agree.
Indicator IDDescription1 Strongly Disagree and 5 Strongly Agree
12345
A1In addition to functionality and provision of basic amenities, guests’ privacy should be taken into consideration in the accommodation layout.
A2Cleanliness, accessibility, and guest-centered hospitality
A3Proper sanitation procedure and ecologically friendly sewage management
A4Common area on the premises where homestay guests could observe or partake in traditional ways of life of the local community, in addition to relaxation.
F1Types of dishes and cooking ingredients
F2Provision of clean drinking water and appliances for modern living
F3Environmentally friendly and clean food containers and tableware
F4Provision of traditional cooking utensils and local condiments (with instruction), in addition to clean food preparation area and modern kitchen utensils
S1Availability of first aid kit
S2Provision of security for guests and their belongings
R1Warm and cordial reception by homestay host and family members as well as by local community members for the long-term sustainability of homestay business
R2Multisector collaboration (i.e., homestay host, other local businesses and community members) to create activities that promote local culture and traditional ways of life
T1Travel information and local destination highlights with community consensus
and seasonal updates
T2Local community oriented travel activity that respects traditional ways of life
T3Provision of tour guides with knowledge of local community. The aim is to create economic opportunities for community members, including developing new skills, finding jobs, and starting new businesses.
N1Availability of local attractions and/or nearby tourist destinations that embody local culture and traditional ways of life
N2Proper supervision and maintenance of tourist destinations with emphasis on environmental conservation and long-term sustainability
N3Strategic and action plans to mitigate the impacts of homestay tourism on the environment and ways of life and identity of the local community
N4Action plans to lessen the impacts of homestay tourism on local natural resources and environment with the goal to reduce global warming
C1Incorporating local culture and traditions into homestay offerings and hospitality services
C2Action plans to preserve traditional livelihoods and local ways of life
V1Availability of a wide selection of local merchandise for sale to visitors, and the offerings should be diverse to minimize price competition.
V2Procedure that engages local government and community members in value creation and addition to local merchandise
M1Forming an alliance of homestay operators with organizational structure and specific duties for representative members
M2Establishment of board of directors (BOD) for the alliance, and the board should consist of representatives from the local community.
M3Duties and responsibilities of BOD
M4Inclusive distribution of economic gain from homestay tourism in proportion to effort and contributions
M5Creating an online hub where visitors are able to make reservations for a variety of services offered by local community businesses (e.g., local transport, tour guide, tourist attractions), in addition to accommodation reservation.
M6Itemized price list of offerings and services to minimize dispute and build trust
P1Adoption of offline and online media platforms for marketing communication to promote homestay tourism and tourist destinations in the local community
P2Marketing communication strategy that emphasizes inclusivity (i.e., all stakeholders contribute to the strategy formulation) and evaluation of the strategy effectiveness
Any suggestion.

References

  1. Thanvisitthpon, N. A social impact assessment of the tourism development policy on a heritage city, Ayutthaya Historical Park, Thailand. Asian Tour. Manag. 2015, 6, 103–144. [Google Scholar]
  2. Tan, D.; Kinginger, C. Exploring the potential of high school homestays as a context for local engagement and negotiation of difference. In Social and Cultural Aspects of Language Learning in Study Abroad; John Benjamins Publishing Co.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2013; Volume 37, pp. 15–177. [Google Scholar]
  3. Oranratmanee, R. Re-utilizing space: Accommodating tourists in homestay houses in northern Thailand. J. Archit. Plan. Res. Stud. (Jars) 2012, 8, 35–54. [Google Scholar]
  4. The ASEAN Secretariat. ASEAN Homestay Standard; The ASEAN Secretariat: Jakarta, Indonesia, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  5. Kontogeorgopoulos, N.; Churyen, A.; Duangsaeng, V. Homestay tourism and the commercialization of the rural home in Thailand. Asia Pac. J. Tour. Res. 2015, 20, 29–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Takran, T.; Chartrungruang, B.; Tantranont, N.; Somhom, S. Constructing a Thai Homestay Standard Assessment Model by Implementing a Decision Tree Technique. Int. J. Comput. Internet Manag. 2017, 25, 106–112. [Google Scholar]
  7. Tavakoli, R.; Mura, P.; Rajaratnam, S.D. Social capital in Malaysian homestays: Exploring hosts’ social relations. Curr. Issues Tour. 2017, 20, 1028–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jiang, Z. Study on the Inheritance and Development of Local Culture in the Homestay. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Economics and Management, Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, Suzhou, China, 18–19 May 2019. [Google Scholar]
  9. Thanvisitthpon, N. Urban environmental assessment and social impact assessment of tourism development policy: Thailand’s Ayutthaya Historical Park. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2016, 18, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kayat, K. The nature of cultural contribution of a community-based homestay programme. Tour. Int. Multidiscip. J. Tour. 2009, 5, 145–159. [Google Scholar]
  11. Vinh, N.Q. Destination culture and its influence on tourist motivation and tourist satisfaction of homestay visit. J. Fac. Econ. Adm. Sci. 2013, 3, 199–222. [Google Scholar]
  12. Promnil, N. Market Segmentation in Community-Based Homestay Tourism in Thailand. J. Talent Dev. Excell. 2020, 12, 2205–2216. [Google Scholar]
  13. Saraithong, W.; Chancharoenchai, K. Tourists behaviour in Thai homestay business. Int. J. Manag. Cases 2011, 13, 112–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Walter, P. Local knowledge and adult learning in environmental adult education: Community-based ecotourism in southern Thailand. Int. J. Lifelong Educ. 2009, 28, 513–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ibrahim, Y.; Razzaq, A.R.A. Homestay program and rural community development in Malaysia. J. Ritsumeikan Soc. Sci. Hum. 2010, 2, 7–24. [Google Scholar]
  16. Gu, M.; Wong, P.P. Residents’ perception of tourism impacts: A case study of homestay operators in Dachangshan Dao, North-East China. Tour. Geogr. 2006, 8, 253–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Budhathoki, B. Impact of Homestay Tourism on Livelihood: A Case Study of Ghale Guan, Lamjung, Nepal. Master’s Thesis, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  18. Wahyuni, R.B.; Faisal, F. Homestay Development with Asean Homestay Standard Approach in Nglanggeran Tourism Village, Yogyakarta, Indonesia. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference One Belt, One Road, One Tourism, Palembang, Indonesia, 22–24 November 2018. [Google Scholar]
  19. Sawatsuk, B.; Darmawijaya, I.G.; Ratchusanti, S.; Phaokrueng, A. Factors determining the sustainable success of community-based tourism: Evidence of good corporate governance of Mae Kam Pong Homestay, Thailand. Int. J. Bus. Econ. Aff. 2018, 3, 13–20. [Google Scholar]
  20. Wang, S.; Hung, K.; Li, M. Development of measurement scale for functional congruity in guest houses. Tour. Manag. 2018, 68, 23–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sharma, S.K. An Assessment and Development of Service Quality Framework of Homestay in Sikkim. Ph.D. Thesis, Shri Ramasamy Memorial University Sikkim, Gangtok, India, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  22. Nor, N.A.M.; Kayat, K. The Challenges of Community-Based Homestay Programme in Malaysia. In Proceedings of the Regional Conference on Tourism Research, Penang, Malaysia, 13–14 December 2010. [Google Scholar]
  23. Dawson, R.J.; Peppe, R.; Wang, M. An agent-based model for risk-based flood incident management. Nat. Hazards 2011, 59, 167–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bayraktar, E.; Tatoglu, E.; Zaim, S. An instrument for measuring the critical factors of TQM in Turkish higher education. Total Qual. Manag. 2008, 19, 551–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Na-nan, K.; Chaiprasit, K.; Pukkeeree, P. A validation of the performance management scale. Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag. 2018, 35, 1253–1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ismail Salaheldin, S. Critical success factors for TQM implementation and their impact on performance of SMEs. Int. J. Prod. Perform. Manag. 2009, 58, 215–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Thanvisitthpon, N.; Shrestha, S.; Pal, I.; Ninsawat, S.; Chaowiwat, W. Assessment of flood adaptive capacity of urban areas in Thailand. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2020, 81, 106363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Thongma, W.; Leelapattana, W.; Hung, J.-T. Tourists’ satisfaction towards tourism activities management of Maesa community, Pongyang sub-district, Maerim district, Chiang Mai province, Thailand. Asian Tour. Manag. 2011, 2, 86–94. [Google Scholar]
  29. Sekorarith, N. Key Factors Influencing Thai Travelers to Choose a Homestay Accommodation in Thailand. Master’s Thesis, Thammasat University, Bangkok, Thailand, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  30. Jamal, S.A.; Othman, N.A.; Muhammad, N.M.N. Tourist perceived value in a community-based homestay visit: An investigation into the functional and experiential aspect of value. J. Vacat. Mark. 2011, 17, 5–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Al-Laymoun, M.; Alsardia, K.; Albattat, A. Service quality and tourist satisfaction at homestays. Manag. Sci. Lett. 2020, 10, 209–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kunjuraman, V.; Hussin, R. Challenges of community-based homestay programme in Sabah, Malaysia: Hopeful or hopeless? Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2017, 21, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Liu, A. Tourism in rural areas: Kedah, Malaysia. Tour. Manag. 2006, 27, 878–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lwoga, N.B.; Maturo, E. Motivation-based segmentation of rural tourism market in African villages. Dev. South. Afr. 2020, 37, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kinginger, C.; Carnine, J. Language learning at the dinner table: Two case studies of French homestays. Foreign Lang. Ann. 2019, 52, 850–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wang, L.; Hu, M.; Guo, Z.; Sun, P.; Geng, F.; Voon, B. China Tourists’ Experiences with Longhouse Homestays in Sarawak. Int. J. Serv. Manag. Sustain. 2019, 4, 25–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Li, L. A review of entrepreneurship research published in the hospitality and tourism management journals. Tour. Manag. 2008, 29, 1013–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Jamal, S.A.; Othman, N.A.; Muhammad, N.M.N. The moderating influence of psychographics in homestay tourism in Malaysia. J. Travel Tour. Mark. 2011, 28, 48–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ahmad, S.Z.; Jabeen, F.; Khan, M. Entrepreneurs choice in business venture: Motivations for choosing home-stay accommodation businesses in Peninsular Malaysia. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2014, 36, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ghaderi, Z.; Som, A.P.M.; Henderson, J.C. Tourism crises and island destinations: Experiences in Penang, Malaysia. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2012, 2, 79–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Razzaq, A.R.A.; Hadi, M.Y.; Mustafa, M.Z.; Hamzah, A.; Khalifah, Z.; Mohamad, N.H. Local community participation in homestay program development in Malaysia. J. Mod. Account. Audit. 2011, 7, 1418. [Google Scholar]
  42. Nguyen, T.N.D. The Role of Local Communities in Community-Based Tourism Development in Traditional Tea Production Areas in Thai Nguyen Province, Vietnam. Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  43. Ross, S.; Wall, G. Evaluating ecotourism: The case of North Sulawesi, Indonesia. Tour. Manag. 1999, 20, 673–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Jamaludin, M.; Othman, N.; Awang, A.R. Community based homestay programme: A personal experience. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2012, 42, 451–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Tsai, K.-T.; Lin, T.-P.; Hwang, R.-L.; Huang, Y.-J. Carbon dioxide emissions generated by energy consumption of hotels and homestay facilities in Taiwan. Tour. Manag. 2014, 42, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Becken, S.; Simmons, D.G.; Frampton, C. Energy use associated with different travel choices. Tour. Manag. 2003, 24, 267–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Rasoolimanesh, S.M.; Dahalan, N.; Jaafar, M. Tourists’ perceived value and satisfaction in a community-based homestay in the Lenggong Valley World Heritage Site. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 2016, 26, 72–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Sen, V.; Walter, P. Community-based ecotourism and the transformative learning of homestay hosts in Cambodia. Tour. Recreat. Res. 2020, 45, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Acharya, B.P.; Halpenny, E.A. Homestays as an alternative tourism product for sustainable community development: A case study of women-managed tourism product in rural Nepal. Tour. Plan. Dev. 2013, 10, 367–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Pusiran, A.K.; Xiao, H. Challenges and community development: A case study of homestay in Malaysia. Asian Soc. Sci. 2013, 9, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Bhalla, P.; Coghlan, A.; Bhattacharya, P. Homestays’ contribution to community-based ecotourism in the Himalayan region of India. Tour. Recreat. Res. 2016, 41, 213–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Choibamroong, T.; Laws, E.; Richins, H.; Agrusa, J.; Scott, N. A stakeholder approach for sustainable community-based rural tourism development in Thailand. In Tourist Destination Governance: Practice, Theory and Issues; CAB International: Wallingford, UK, 2011; pp. 173–186. [Google Scholar]
  53. Tao, T.C.; Wall, G. Tourism as a sustainable livelihood strategy. Tour. Manag. 2009, 30, 90–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Sood, J.; Lynch, P.; Anastasiadou, C. Community non-participation in homestays in Kullu, Himachal Pradesh, India. Tour. Manag. 2017, 60, 332–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Ngoasong, M.Z.; Kimbu, A.N. Informal microfinance institutions and development-led tourism entrepreneurship. Tour. Manag. 2016, 52, 430–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Hussin, R.; Kunjuraman, V. Sustainable community based tourism (CBT) through homestay programme in Sabah, East Malaysia. In Proceedings of the Social Sciences Research ICSSR, Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia, 9–10 June 2014; pp. 41–61. [Google Scholar]
  57. Anagnostopoulos, F.; Niakas, D.; Tountas, Y. Comparison between exploratory factor-analytic and SEM-based approaches to constructing SF-36 summary scores. Qual. Life Res. 2009, 18, 53–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Marsh, H.W.; Morin, A.J.; Parker, P.D.; Kaur, G. Exploratory structural equation modeling: An integration of the best features of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 2014, 10, 85–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Suhr, D.D. Exploratory or Confirmatory Factor Analysis? SAS Institute: Cary, NC, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  60. Kyriazos, T.A. Applied psychometrics: Sample size and sample power considerations in factor analysis (EFA, CFA) and SEM in general. Psychology 2018, 9, 2207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Hsu, S.-L.; Lin, Y.-M. Factors underlying college students’ choice homestay accommodation while travelling. World Trans. Eng. Technol. Educ. 2011, 9, 196–202. [Google Scholar]
  62. Hui-min, G.; Jinging, G.; Fan, G.; Shan, L. Study on green tourism consumptions of Chinese tourist with different environment perception. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, Beijing, China, 8–11 June 2011. [Google Scholar]
  63. QU, Q. Research on Symbiotic Community Space Participated by Citizen and Villager in Village. Master’s Thesis, Poltecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  64. Karki, K.; Chhetri, B.B.K.; Chaudhary, B.; Khanal, G. Assessment of socio-economic and environmental outcomes of the homestay program at Amaltari village of Nawalparasi, Nepal. J. Nat. Resour. Manag. 2019, 1, 77–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Sujatha, D.K.; Diwyarthi, N.D.M.S. Tourist Satisfaction towards Management of Home Stay in Lumajang District. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference One Belt, One Road, One Tourism, Palembang, Indonesia, 22–24 November 2018. [Google Scholar]
  66. KC, B. Ecotourism for wildlife conservation and sustainable livelihood via community-based homestay: A formula to success or a quagmire? Curr. Issues Tour. 2020, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Tseng, M.-L.; Lin, C.; Lin, C.-W.R.; Wu, K.-J.; Sriphon, T. Ecotourism development in Thailand: Community participation leads to the value of attractions using linguistic preferences. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 231, 1319–1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Dahal, B.; Anup, K.; Sapkota, R.P. Environmental Impacts of Community-Based Home stay Ecotourism in Nepal. Gaze J. Tour. Hosp. 2020, 11, 60–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Escolar-Jimenez, C.C. Cultural homestay enterprises: Sustainability factors in Kiangan, Ifugao. Hosp. Soc. 2020, 10, 63–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Agyeiwaah, E. Exploring the relevance of sustainability to micro tourism and hospitality accommodation enterprises (MTHAEs): Evidence from home-stay owners. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 226, 159–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Pommaret, F. Conservation of cultural landscapes in Bhutan. In Cultural Landscapes of South Asia; Routledge: Abingdon-on-Thames, UK, 2016; pp. 33–43. [Google Scholar]
  72. Sarobol, A. Costume development model for tourism promotion in Mae Hong Son province, Thailand. In SHS Web of Conferences; EDP Sciences: Les Ulis, France, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  73. Amin, A.; Ibrahim, Y. Model of sustainable community participation in homestay program. Mediterr. J. Soc. Sci. 2015, 6, 539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Kim, J.-O.; Mueller, C.W. Factor Analysis: Statistical Methods and Practical Issues; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 1978; Volume 14. [Google Scholar]
  75. Baumgartner, H.; Homburg, C. Applications of structural equation modeling in marketing and consumer research: A review. Int. J. Res. Mark. 1996, 13, 139–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Gatignon, H. Statistical Analysis of Management Data; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  77. Hooper, D.; Coughlan, J.; Mullen, M. Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electron. J. Bus. Res. Methods 2008, 6, 53–60. [Google Scholar]
  78. Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 18, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Gao, Z.; Wang, L. Research on the Development Path of Yangjiale Homestay in the Background of Rural Revitalization Strategy. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Advances in Social Sciences, London, UK, 28–30 November 2019. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. The factor loadings of six validated homestay components and related indicators.
Figure 1. The factor loadings of six validated homestay components and related indicators.
Sustainability 13 00936 g001
Table 1. Component- and indicator-level requirements for Thai homestay businesses by the Ministry of Tourism and Sports of Thailand.
Table 1. Component- and indicator-level requirements for Thai homestay businesses by the Ministry of Tourism and Sports of Thailand.
Component-Level Requirements/Indicator IDIndicator-Level RequirementsReferences Pertaining to Updated Indicators
Original/Existing IndicatorsUpdated/Revised Indicators
Component 1: Accommodation and amenities
A1Functionality focused accommodations and basic amenitiesIn addition to functionality and provision of basic amenities, guests’ privacy should be taken into consideration in the accommodation layout[28,29]
A2Cleanliness and accessibilityCleanliness, accessibility, and guest-centered hospitality[30,31,32]
A3Proper sanitation and sewage managementProper sanitation procedure and ecologically friendly sewage management[5,31,33]
A4Common area on the premises for guests’ relaxationCommon area on the premises where homestay guests could observe or partake in traditional ways of life of the local community, in addition to relaxation.[5,32,34]
Component 2: Food and beverage
F1Types of dishes and cooking ingredientsTypes of dishes and cooking ingredients[35]
F2Provision of clean drinking waterProvision of clean drinking water and appliances for modern living[5,33,35,36]
F3Clean food containers and tableware (e.g., dishware, glassware, cutlery)Environmentally friendly and clean food containers and tableware
F4Clean food preparation area and kitchen utensilsProvision of traditional cooking utensils and local condiments (with instruction), in addition to clean food preparation area and modern kitchen utensils[33,35,37]
Component 3: Safety to life and belongings
S1Availability of first aid kitAvailability of first aid kit
S2Provision of security for guests and their belongingsProvision of security for guests and their belongings[29,38,39,40]
Component 4: Hospitality of homestay host and family members
R1Warm and cordial reception by homestay host and family membersWarm and cordial reception by homestay host and family members as well as by local community members for the long-term sustainability of homestay business[19,30,32,34]
R2Activities initiated by homestay host to promote local culture and traditional ways of lifeMultisector collaboration (i.e., homestay host, other local businesses and community members) to create activities that promote local culture and traditional ways of life[19,30,41,42]
Component 5: Travel information and tour guide
T1Travel information and local destination highlights with community consensusTravel information and local destination highlights with community consensus and seasonal updates[41,43]
T2Local community oriented travel activityLocal community oriented travel activity that respects traditional ways of life[32,41,42]
T3Provision of tour guides with knowledge of local communityProvision of tour guides with knowledge of local community. The aim is to create economic opportunities for community members, including developing new skills, finding jobs, and starting new businesses.[14,41,44]
Component 6: Natural resources and the environment
N1Availability of local attractions and/or nearby tourist destinationsAvailability of local attractions and/or nearby tourist destinations that embody local culture and traditional ways of life[1,9,41,43,44]
N2Proper supervision and maintenance of tourist destinationsProper supervision and maintenance of tourist destinations with emphasis on environmental conservation and long-term sustainability[14,45,46]
N3Strategic plans to mitigate the impacts of homestay tourism on local community and global warmingStrategic and action plans to mitigate the impacts of homestay tourism on the environment and ways of life and identity of the local community[9,14,45]
N4Implementation of the strategic plans to mitigate the impacts of homestay tourism on local community and global warmingAction plans to lessen the impacts of homestay tourism on local natural resources and environment with the goal to reduce global warming[45,46]
Component 7: Cultural heritage and livelihood
C1Preservation of cultural heritage of local communityIncorporating local culture and traditions into homestay offerings and hospitality services[19,44,47]
C2Preservation of local livelihoods and ways of lifeAction plans to preserve traditional livelihoods and local ways of life[44,47,48]
Component 8: Addition of value to local merchandise
V1Availability of a wide selection of local merchandise for sale to visitorsAvailability of a wide selection of local merchandise for sale to visitors, and the offerings should be diverse to minimize price competition.[49,50]
V2Addition of value to local merchandiseProcedure that engages local government and community members in value creation and addition to local merchandise[19,49]
Component 9: Homestay operation and management
M1Forming a group of homestay operatorsForming an alliance of homestay operators with organizational structure and specific duties for representative members[14,19,33,47,51,52]
M2Establishment of board of directors (BOD) for the groupEstablishment of board of directors (BOD) for the alliance, and the board should consist of representatives from the local community.[33,51,52,53]
M3Duties and responsibilities of BODDuties and responsibilities of BOD[33,52]
M4Economic gain from homestay tourism proportionately distributed among stakeholders (i.e., homestay operators, local community members, local administration in the form of taxes)Inclusive distribution of economic gain from homestay tourism in proportion to effort and contributions[12,33,53,54]
M5Homestay reservation and cancellation policyCreating an online hub where visitors are able to make reservations for a variety of services offered by local community businesses (e.g., local transport, tour guide, tourist attractions), in addition to accommodation reservation.[19,52,55]
M6Itemized price list of offerings and servicesItemized price list of offerings and services to minimize dispute and build trust[33,54,55]
Component 10: Marketing communication and promotion
P1Availability of print marketing or promotional materialAdoption of offline and online media platforms for marketing communication to promote homestay tourism and tourist destinations in the local community[14,43,47]
P2Distribution of print marketing or promotional materialMarketing communication strategy that emphasizes inclusivity (i.e., all stakeholders contribute to the strategy formulation) and evaluation of the strategy effectiveness[42,47,56]
Table 2. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of the updated indicators and component-based factor weight scores.
Table 2. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of the updated indicators and component-based factor weight scores.
Indicator IDCommon FactorComponent-Based Factor Weight Scores *
Component 1Component 2Component 3Component 4Component 5Component 6
A10.5890.778
S20.8760.932
T20.8740.927
C20.9450.967
M40.8130.896
P20.8370.905
A20.481 0.666
S10.662 0.774
T10.693 0.831
C10.886 0.933
M30.788 0.879
P10.731 0.836
R10.745 0.858
T30.826 0.903
V10.917 0.949
M10.758 0.864
M50.752 0.858
A30.579 0.749
F10.848 0.909
F30.879 0.919
N20.815 0.897
N40.801 0.872
A40.549 0.691
F20.887 0.927
F40.881 0.917
N10.846 0.902
N30.706 0.820
R20.876 0.923
V20.867 0.927
M20.894 0.941
M60.779 0.876
Initial Eigenvalues6.1864.6103.9973.6453.2512.666
% of Variance19.95514.87212.89411.75810.4878.599
* EFA statistically regrouped the 31 updated indictors by six homestay components rather than by the original 10 components.
Table 3. Descriptions of the EFA-validated components and indicators.
Table 3. Descriptions of the EFA-validated components and indicators.
Descriptions of ComponentsIndicator IDFactor Weight ScoresDescriptions of Updated Indicators
Component 1: Congruence with local ways of life and inclusive local economic development
Homestay businesses are required to make available safe facilities and basic amenities for guests [61]. In addition, the establishment of homestays minimally disrupt local ways of life and traditions [33,62]. Homestay tourism should also attach importance to inclusive local economic development where the majority of community members benefit from the scheme to guarantee the success and sustainability of the business [63,64].
A10.667In addition to functionality and provision of basic amenities, guests’ privacy should be taken into consideration in the accommodation layout.
S20.914Provision of security for guests and their belongings
T20.904Local community oriented travel activity that respects traditional ways of life
C20.993Action plans to preserve traditional livelihoods and local ways of life
M40.879Inclusive distribution of economic gain from homestay tourism in proportion to effort and contributions
P20.884Marketing communication strategy that emphasizes inclusivity (i.e., all stakeholders contribute to the strategy formulation) and evaluation of the strategy effectiveness
Component 2: Homestay operation and hospitality management
Homestay guests are entitled to basic amenities during their stay and should be afforded with opportunities to observe traditional ways of life or partake in local activities [65]. Homestay operation should preserve and promote local culture and ways of life. In addition, active participation from community members should be encouraged in the operation and management of local homestay tourism [33].
A20.554Cleanliness, accessibility, and guest-centered hospitality
S10.673Availability of first aid kit
T10.787Travel information and local destination highlights with community consensus and seasonal updates
C10.953Incorporating local culture and traditions into homestay offerings and hospitality services
M30.880Duties and responsibilities of BOD
P10.834Adoption of offline and online media platforms for marketing communication to promote homestay tourism and tourist destinations in the local community
Component 3: Roles of local stakeholders in homestay tourism longevity
Active participation and contributions from local community members and other stakeholders play a crucial role in the success and sustainability of homestay tourism [42,66,67]
R10.817Warm and cordial reception by homestay host and family members as well as by local community members for the long-term sustainability of homestay business
T30.908Provision of tour guides with knowledge of local community. The aim is to create economic opportunities for community members, including developing new skills, finding jobs, and starting new businesses.
V10.982Availability of a wide selection of local merchandise for sale to visitors, and the offerings should be diverse to minimize price competition.
M10.779Forming an alliance of homestay operators with organizational structure and specific duties for representative members
M50.811Creating an online hub where visitors are able to make reservations for a variety of services offered by local community businesses (e.g., local transport, tour guide, tourist attractions), in addition to accommodation reservation.
Component 4: Cleanliness, infrastructure, and the environment
In satisfying the needs of homestay guests, the impact of homestay tourism on the environment and local community should be minimized. The sustainability of tourist destinations is dependent upon environmental concerns and conservation of local stakeholders [42,68]. Construction of homestay accommodations and the operation should attach importance to eco-friendliness and long-term sustainability [69]. Moreover, use of locally-grown cooking ingredients in guests’ meals should be encouraged to reduce transport-induced carbon footprint and global warming [70].
A30.718Proper sanitation procedure and ecologically friendly sewage management
F10.827Types of dishes and cooking ingredients
F30.971Environmentally friendly and clean food containers and tableware
N20.896Proper supervision and maintenance of tourist destinations with emphasis on environmental conservation and long-term sustainability
N40.775Action plans to lessen the impacts of homestay tourism on local natural resources and environment with the goal to reduce global warming
Component 5: Local identity and carrying capacity of homestay
Homestay tourism should go beyond basic amenities (e.g., electricity, clean water) to incorporate culture and ways of life of local community members [69,71,72]. Long-held local traditions, custom practices, and beliefs could be unique selling propositions to attract travelers (Edgell, et al. 2008). Moreover, local traditions and practices could be incorporated into homestay designs and offerings/services to promote the identity of local community [67].
A40.691Common area on the premises where homestay guests could observe or partake in traditional ways of life of the local community, in addition to relaxation.
F20.927Provision of clean drinking water and appliances for modern living
F40.917Provision of traditional cooking utensils and local condiments (with instruction), in addition to clean food preparation area and modern kitchen utensils
N10.902Availability of local attractions and/or nearby tourist destinations that embody local culture and traditional ways of life
N30.820Strategic and action plans to mitigate the impacts of homestay tourism on the environment and ways of life and identity of the local community
Component 6: Stakeholder involvement strategy
A collaborative alliance between homestay operators and other local community businesses should be forged to better satisfy the diverse needs of visitors and to develop local homestay tourism [42,67,73].
R20.923Multisector collaboration (i.e., homestay host, other local businesses and community members) to create activities that promote local culture and traditional ways of life
V20.927Procedure that engages local government and community members in value creation and addition to local merchandise
M20.941Establishment of board of directors (BOD) for the alliance, and the board should consist of representatives from the local community.
M60.876Itemized price list of offerings and services to minimize dispute and build trust
Table 4. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of EFA-validated components and indicators.
Table 4. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of EFA-validated components and indicators.
Component
(Latent Factors)
Homestay IndicatorsR2 *Validity of Homestay Components
Composite Reliability (CR) **Average Variance Extracted (AVE)
Component 1
(Factor loading = 0.398)
A1
S2
T2
C2
M4
P2
0.444
0.835
0.883
0.986
0.773
0.781
0.9530.773
Component 2
(Factor loading = 0.454)
A2
S1
T1
C1
M3
P1
0.307
0.453
0.620
0.907
0.774
0.696
0.9260.678
Component 3
(Factor loading = 0.372)
R1
T3
V1
M1
M5
0.668
0.825
0.965
0.608
0.658
0.9480.787
Component 4
(Factor loading = 0.449)
A3
F1
F3
N2
N4
0.515
0.684
0.943
0.803
0.600
0.9400.759
Component 5
(Factor loading = 0.444)
A4
F2
F4
N1
N3
0.435
0.793
0.961
0.840
0.551
0.9310.732
Component 6
(Factor loading = 0.338)
R2
V2
M2
M6
0.873
0.798
0.869
0.731
0.9550.841
* R2 indicates the reliability of homestay indicators, given that R2 > 0.3 is statistically acceptable. ** CR indicates the reliability of homestay component, given that CR > 0.6 is statistically acceptable.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Thanvisitthpon, N. Statistically Validated Component- and Indicator-Level Requirements for Sustainable Thai Homestay Businesses. Sustainability 2021, 13, 936. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020936

AMA Style

Thanvisitthpon N. Statistically Validated Component- and Indicator-Level Requirements for Sustainable Thai Homestay Businesses. Sustainability. 2021; 13(2):936. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020936

Chicago/Turabian Style

Thanvisitthpon, Nawhath. 2021. "Statistically Validated Component- and Indicator-Level Requirements for Sustainable Thai Homestay Businesses" Sustainability 13, no. 2: 936. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020936

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop