Next Article in Journal
Non-Parametric Threshold Estimation for the Wiener–Poisson Risk Model
Next Article in Special Issue
Simplified Fractional Order Controller Design Algorithm
Previous Article in Journal
A Bayesian Equal Part Regression Analysis of the Influencing Factors of Taiwanese People’s Regime Acceptance of Mainland China and U.S. Governments
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

An Analytical Technique to Solve the System of Nonlinear Fractional Partial Differential Equations

1
Department of Mathematics, Abdul Wali khan University, Mardan 23200, Pakistan
2
Center of Excellence in Theoretical and Computational Science (TaCS-CoE) & Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi (KMUTT), 126 Pracha Uthit Rd., Bang Mod, Thung Khru, Bangkok 10140, Thailand
3
Department of Medical Research, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung 40402, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mathematics 2019, 7(6), 505; https://doi.org/10.3390/math7060505
Submission received: 21 April 2019 / Revised: 9 May 2019 / Accepted: 13 May 2019 / Published: 2 June 2019

Abstract

:
The Kortweg–de Vries equations play an important role to model different physical phenomena in nature. In this research article, we have investigated the analytical solution to system of nonlinear fractional Kortweg–de Vries, partial differential equations. The Caputo operator is used to define fractional derivatives. Some illustrative examples are considered to check the validity and accuracy of the proposed method. The obtained results have shown the best agreement with the exact solution for the problems. The solution graphs are in full support to confirm the authenticity of the present method.

1. Introduction

In the study of nonlinear dispersive waves, Kortweg–de Vries (KdV) is an important class of differential equations. This class is derived by two great scientists Kortweg and de Vries in 1895 for describing long wave propagation on shallow water. Although KdV equations are studied from a decade, its physical behavior is still curious. The phenomena described by Russell can be expressed by the KdV equation successfully [1]. This equation plays an important role in various fields of science and technology, so a lot of research work has been devoted for this study [2]. Numerous physical problems in different fields of mechanics, biology, hydrodynamics and plasma physics are successfully modelled by a nonlinear coupled system of Partial Differential Equations (PDEs).
In nonlinear PDEs, the nonlinear term is completely responsible for the study of any physical problem [3]. The exact solution of nonlinear PDEs may not be calculated easily, therefore various analytical and numerical techniques have been suggested for the solution of such types of equations. The well-known analytical approaches for the solution of coupled systems of differential equations are iterative methods, perturbation methods and homotopy based methods, etc. Each approach has its own merits and demerits. Some approaches for the solution of coupled system of differential equations have been discussed successfully in [2].
Generalized Hirota–Satsuma coupled KdV equations have been solved, using the modified decomposition method [4]. An exact approach has been suggested for the solution of coupled KdV, using the homogenous balance method [5]. By using the differential transform method, the analytical solutions of coupled KdV have been studied in [6]. The homotopy analysis method have been described in [7] for solving KdV equations. The exact solution of KdV has been investigated in [8] using the variational iteration method. The analytical solution for a generalized coupled system of Zakharov–Kuznetsov and KdV equations have been obtained in [9] using the modified extended tanh method.
In 1980, George Adomian has introduced a new mathematical technique, known as the adomian decomposition method (ADM) to solve nonlinear differential equations [10]. Similarly, another powerful technique for solving PDEs discovered by Pierre-Simon Laplace is known as the Laplace transform method, which transforms the original differential equations into an algebraic expression [11]. Among all these methods, the Laplace Adomian Decompostion Method (LADM) is an efficient analytical method to solve nonlinear fractional partial differential equations. LADM is the combination of two powerful techniques, Laplace transform and the Adomian Decomposition Method. Furthermore, the proposed method has no requirement of predefined size declaration like Runge–Kutta methods. Therefore, this technique is considered to be ideal for those equations that represent nonlinear models. Compared to other analytical techniques, LADM have less numbers of parameters; therefore, LADM is a perfect technique, requiring no discretization and linearization [12]. Non-linear Coupled PDE’s and non-linear Blasius flow equation using Laplace decompostion method [13,14]. A comparison between the LADM and ADM for the analysis of FPDEs is discussed in [15]. The Kundu–Eckhaus Equation deals in the quantum field theory, and the analytical solution of this nonlinear PDEs has been derived in [10] using LADM. The multi-step Laplace Adomian decomposition method has been described in [16] for nonlinear fractional differential equations. Analysis of the fractional order smoke model has been studied successfully by using LADM [17]. Such as Fractional Order Epidemic Model of a Vector Born Disease [18], Multi dimensional of Navier–Stokes equation [19] and third-order dispersive FPDE’s using LADM [20]. Motivated from the above studies, in this paper, we applied LADM to solve the system of fractional KdV equations [21].

2. Definitions and Preliminary Concepts

Definition 1.
R-L fractional integral
I x γ g ( x ) = g ( x ) , i f γ = 0 , 1 Γ ( γ ) 0 x ( x - υ ) γ - 1 g ( υ ) d υ i f γ > 0 ,
where Γ denote the gamma function defined by
Γ ( ω ) = 0 e - x x ω - 1 d x ω C .
In this study, Caputo et al. [22] suggested a revised fractional derivative operator in order to overcome inconsistency measured in the Riemann–Liouville derivative [23]. The above mathematical statement described the Caputo fractional derivative operator of initial and boundary conditions for fractional as well as integer order derivatives.
Definition 2.
The Caputo operator of order γ for fractional derivative is given by the following mathematical expression for n N , x > 0 , g C t , t - 1 :
D γ g ( x ) = γ g ( x ) t γ = I n - γ γ g ( x ) t γ , i f n - 1 < γ n , n N , γ g ( x ) t γ .
Hence, we require the subsequent properties given in the next Lemma.
Lemma 1.
If n - 1 < γ n with n N and g C t with t - 1 , then
I γ I a g ( x ) = I γ + a g ( x ) , a , γ 0 . I γ x λ = Γ ( λ + 1 ) Γ ( γ + λ + 1 ) x γ + λ , γ > 0 , λ > - 1 , x > 0 . I γ D γ g ( x ) = g ( x ) - k = 0 n - 1 g ( k ) ( 0 + ) x k k ! , for x > 0 , n - 1 < γ n .
In the current study, the Caputo operator is reasonable as other fractional derivative operators have certain disadvantages. Further information about fractional derivatives are found in [24].
Definition 3.
The Laplace transform of h ( t ) , t > 0 is defined by
H ( s ) = L [ h ( t ) ] = 0 e - s t h ( t ) d t .
Definition 4.
The Laplace transform in term of convolution is given by
L [ h 1 h 2 ] = L [ h 1 ( t ) ] L [ h 2 ( t ) ] .
Here, h 1 h 2 , define the convolution between h 1 and h 2 ,
( h 1 h 2 ) t = 0 τ h 1 ( τ ) h 2 ( t - τ ) d t .
Fractional derivative in terms of Laplace transform is
L D t γ h ( t ) = s γ H ( s ) - k = 0 n - 1 s γ - 1 - k h ( k ) ( 0 ) , n - 1 < γ < n ,
where H ( s ) is the Laplace transform of h ( t ) .
Definition 5.
The Mittag–Leffler function, E γ ( p ) for γ > 0 is represented as
E γ ( p ) = n = 0 p n Γ ( γ n + 1 ) γ > 0 , p C .
Theorem 1.
Here, we will study the convergence analysis in the same manner as [25] of the LADM applied to the fractional-order Kortweg–de Vries. Let us consider the Hilbert space H which may define by H = L 2 ( ( α , β ) X [ 0 , T ] ) the set of applications:
u : ( α , β ) X [ 0 , T ] w i t h ( α , β ) X [ 0 , T ] u 2 ( x , s ) d s d θ < + .
Now, we consider the fractional-order Kortweg–de Vries in the above assumptions and let us denote
L ( u ) = γ u t γ .
Then, the fractional dispersive PDE becomes in an operator form
L ( u ) = - φ ν ( x , t ) x - w 3 ν ( x , t ) x 3 .
The LADM is convergence, if the following two hypotheses are satisfied:
( H 1 ) ( L ( u ) - L ( v ) , u - v ) k u - v 2 ; k > 0 , u , v ϵ H .
H ( 2 ) may be M > 0 , and there exists a constant C ( M ) > 0 such that, for u , v ϵ H with u M , v M , we have ( L ( u ) - L ( v ) , u - v ) C ( M ) u - v w for every w ϵ H .

3. Idea of Fractional Laplace–Adomian Decomposition Method

In this section, the Laplace–Adomian Decomposition Method is discussed for the solution of FPDEs:
D γ u ( x 1 , t 1 ) + L u ( x 1 , t 1 ) + N u ( x 1 , t 1 ) = q ( x 1 , t 1 ) , x 1 , t 1 0 , m - 1 < γ < m ,
where D γ = γ t 1 γ the Caputo Operator γ , m N , where L and N are linear and nonlinear functions, q is the source function.
The initial condition is
u ( x 1 , 0 ) = k ( x 1 ) , 0 < γ 1 , t 1 > 0 .
Applying the Laplace transform to Equation (1), we have
L D γ u ( x 1 , t 1 ) + L L u ( x 1 , t 1 ) + N u ( x 1 , t 1 ) = L q ( x 1 , t 1 ) ,
and using the differentiation property of Laplace transform, we get
s γ L u ( x 1 , t 1 ) - s γ - 1 u ( x 1 , 0 ) = L q ( x 1 , t 1 ) - L L u ( x 1 , t 1 ) + N u ( x 1 , t 1 ) ,
L u ( x 1 , t 1 ) = k ( x 1 ) s + 1 s γ L q ( x 1 , t 1 ) - 1 s γ L L u ( x 1 , t 1 ) + N u ( x 1 , t 1 ) .
The LADM solution u ( x 1 , t 1 ) is represented by the following infinite series
u ( x 1 , t 1 ) = j = 0 u j ( x 1 , t 1 ) ,
and the nonlinear terms (if any) in the problem are defined by the infinite series of Adomian polynomials,
N u ( x 1 , t 1 ) = j = 0 A j ,
A j = 1 j ! d j d λ j N j = 0 ( λ j u j ) λ = 0 , j = 0 , 1 , 2 . . .
Substituting Equations (5) and (6) into Equation (4), we get
L j = 0 u ( x 1 , t 1 ) = k ( x 1 ) s + 1 s γ L q ( x 1 , t 1 ) - 1 s γ L M j = 0 u j ( x 1 , t 1 ) + j = 0 A j .
Applying the linearity of the Laplace transform,
L u 0 ( x 1 , t 1 ) = u ( x 1 , 0 ) s + 1 s γ L q ( x 1 , t 1 ) = k ( x 1 , s ) ,
L u 1 ( x 1 , t 1 ) = - 1 s γ L L u 0 ( x 1 , t 1 ) + A 0 .
Generally, we can write
L u j + 1 ( x 1 , t 1 ) = - 1 s γ L L u j ( x 1 , t 1 ) + A j , j 1 .
Applying the inverse Laplace transform, in Equation (9)
u 0 ( x 1 , t 1 ) = k ( x 1 , t 1 )
u j + 1 ( x 1 , t 1 ) = - L - 1 1 s γ L L u j ( x 1 , t 1 ) + A j .

4. Results

Example 1.
Consider the nonlinear KdV system of time-fractional order
γ u t 1 γ = - a 3 u x 1 3 - 6 a u u x 1 + 6 v v x 1 , γ v t 1 γ = - a 3 v x 1 3 - 3 a u v x 1 , 0 < γ < 1 ,
with initial condition
u ( x 1 , 0 ) = η 2 sec h 2 ( α 2 + η x 1 2 ) , v ( x 1 , 0 ) = a 2 η 2 sec h 2 ( α 2 + η x 1 2 ) .
For γ = 1 , the exact solutions of the KdV system Equation (11) are given by
u ( x 1 , t 1 ) = η 2 sec h 2 ( α 2 + η x 1 2 - a η 3 t 1 2 ) , v ( x 1 , t 1 ) = a 2 η 2 sec h 2 ( α 2 + η x 1 2 - a η 3 t 1 2 ) ,
where the constant a is a wave velocity and η,α are arbitrary constants.
Taking Laplace transform of Equation (11),
L γ u t 1 γ = L - a 3 u x 1 3 - 6 a u u x 1 + 6 v v x 1 ,
L γ v t 1 γ = L - a 3 v x 1 3 - 3 a u v x 1 ,
s γ L u ( x 1 , t 1 ) - s γ - 1 u ( x 1 , 0 ) = L - a 3 u x 1 3 - 6 a u u x 1 + 6 v v x 1 ,
s γ L v ( x 1 , t 1 ) - s γ - 1 v ( x 1 , 0 ) = L - a 3 v x 1 3 - 3 a u v x 1 .
Applying inverse Laplace transform
u ( x 1 , t 1 ) = L - 1 u ( x 1 , 0 ) s + 1 s γ L - a 3 u x 1 3 - 6 a u u x 1 + 6 v v x 1 , v ( x 1 , t 1 ) = L - 1 v ( x 1 , 0 ) s + 1 s γ L - a 3 v x 1 3 - 3 a u v x 1 ,
u ( x 1 , t 1 ) = η 2 sec h 2 ( α 2 + η x 1 2 ) + L - 1 1 s γ L - a 3 u x 1 3 - 6 a u u x 1 + 6 v v x 1 , v ( x 1 , t 1 ) = a 2 η 2 sec h 2 ( α 2 + η x 1 2 ) + L - 1 1 s γ L - a 3 v x 1 3 - 3 a u v x 1 .
Using the ADM procedure, we get
j = 0 u j ( x 1 , t 1 ) = η 2 sec h 2 ( α 2 + η x 1 2 ) + L - 1 1 s γ L - a j = 0 3 u j x 1 3 - 6 a j = 0 A j ( u , u x 1 ) + 6 j = 0 B j ( v , v x 1 ) ,
j = 0 v j ( x 1 , t 1 ) = a 2 η 2 sec h 2 ( α 2 + η x 1 2 ) + L - 1 1 s γ L - a j = 0 3 v j x 1 3 - 3 a j = 0 C j ( u , v x 1 ) ,
where A j ( u , u x 1 ) , B j ( v , v x 1 ) and C j ( u , v x 1 ) are Adomian polynomials, represent nonlinear terms in above equations. The components of the above Adomian polynomials are given below:
A 0 ( u , u x 1 ) = u 0 u 0 x 1 , A 1 ( u , u x 1 ) = u 0 u 1 x 1 + u 1 u 0 x 1 , A 2 ( u , u x 1 ) = u 0 u 2 x 1 + u 1 u 1 x 1 + u 2 u 0 x 1 .
B 0 ( v , v x 1 ) = v 0 v 0 x 1 , B 1 ( v , v x 1 ) = v 0 v 1 x 1 + v 1 v 0 x 1 , B 2 ( v , v x 1 ) = v 0 v 2 x 1 + v 1 v 1 x 1 + v 2 v 0 x 1 .
C 0 ( u , v x 1 ) = u 0 v 0 x 1 , C 1 ( u , v x 1 ) = u 0 v 1 x 1 + u 1 v 0 x 1 , C 2 ( u , v x 1 ) = u 0 v 2 x 1 + u 1 v 1 x 1 + u 2 v 0 x 1 .
u 0 ( x 1 , t 1 ) = η 2 sec h 2 ( α 2 + η x 1 2 ) , v 0 ( x 1 , t 1 ) = a 2 η 2 sec h 2 ( α 2 + η x 1 2 ) ,
u j + 1 ( x 1 , t 1 ) = L - 1 1 s γ L - a j = 0 3 u j x 1 3 - 6 a j = 0 A j ( u , u x 1 ) + 6 j = 0 B j ( v , v x 1 ) ,
v j + 1 ( x 1 , t 1 ) = L - 1 1 s γ L - a j = 0 3 v j x 1 3 - 3 a j = 0 C j ( u , v x 1 ) ,
for j = 0 , 1 , 2 , . .
u 1 ( x 1 , t 1 ) = L - 1 1 s γ L - a 3 u 0 x 1 3 - 6 a u 0 u 0 x 1 + 6 v 0 v 0 x 1 , u 1 ( x 1 , t 1 ) = η 5 a tan h ( α 2 + η x 1 2 ) sec h 2 ( α 2 + η x 1 2 ) L - 1 1 s γ + 1 = η 5 a tan h ( α 2 + η x 1 2 ) sec h 2 ( α 2 + η x 1 2 ) t 1 γ Γ ( γ + 1 ) , v 1 ( x 1 , t 1 ) = L - 1 1 s γ L - a 3 v 0 x 1 3 - 3 a u 0 v 0 x 1 , v 1 ( x 1 , t 1 ) = η 5 a 3 2 2 tan h ( α 2 + η x 1 2 ) sec h 2 ( α 2 + η x 1 2 ) L - 1 1 s γ + 1 = η 5 a 3 2 2 tan h ( α 2 + η x 1 2 ) sec h 2 ( α 2 + η x 1 2 ) t 1 γ Γ ( γ + 1 ) .
The subsequent terms are
u 2 ( x 1 , t 1 ) = L - 1 1 s γ L - a 3 u 1 x 1 3 - 6 a u 0 u 1 x 1 - 6 a u 1 u 0 x 1 + 6 v 0 v 1 x 1 + 6 v 1 v 0 x 1 , = η 8 a 2 2 [ 2 cos h 2 ( α 2 + η x 1 2 ) - 3 ] sec h 4 ( α 2 + η x 1 2 ) t 1 2 γ Γ ( 2 γ + 1 ) , v 2 ( x 1 , t 1 ) = L - 1 1 s γ L - a 3 v 1 x 1 3 - 3 a u 0 v 1 x 1 - 3 a u 1 v 0 x 1 , = η 5 a 5 2 2 4 [ 2 cos h 2 ( α 2 + η x 1 2 ) - 3 ] sec h 4 ( α 2 + η x 1 2 ) t 1 2 γ Γ ( 2 γ + 1 ) . u 3 ( x 1 , t 1 ) = L - 1 [ 1 s γ L [ - a 3 u 2 x 1 3 - 6 a u 0 u 2 x 1 - 6 a u 1 u 1 x 1 - 6 a u 2 u 0 x 1 + 6 v 0 v 2 x 1 + 6 v 1 v 1 x 1 + 6 v 2 v 0 x 1 ] ] , = sin h ( α 2 + η x 1 2 ) t 1 3 γ a 3 η 4 2 Γ ( 3 γ + 1 ) Γ ( γ + 1 ) 2 cos h 7 ( α 2 + η x 1 2 ) [ 2 Γ ( γ + 1 ) 2 cos h 4 ( α 2 + η x 1 2 ) - 18 Γ ( γ + 1 ) 2 cos h 2 ( α 2 + η x 1 2 ) + 6 Γ ( 2 γ + 1 ) cos h 2 ( α 2 + η x 1 2 ) + 18 Γ ( γ + 1 ) 2 - 9 Γ ( 2 γ + 1 ) ] v 3 ( x 1 , t 1 ) = L - 1 1 s γ L - a 3 v 2 x 1 3 - 3 a u 0 v 2 x 1 - 3 a u 1 v 1 x 1 - 3 a u 2 v 0 x 1 , = 2 sin h ( α 2 + η x 1 2 ) t 1 3 γ a 7 2 η 11 4 Γ ( 3 γ + 1 ) Γ ( γ + 1 ) 2 cos h 7 ( α 2 + η x 1 2 ) [ 2 Γ ( γ + 1 ) 2 cos h 4 ( α 2 + η x 1 2 ) - 18 Γ ( γ + 1 ) 2 cos h 2 ( α 2 + η x 1 2 ) + 6 Γ ( 2 γ + 1 ) cos h 2 ( α 2 + η x 1 2 ) + 18 Γ ( γ + 1 ) 2 - 9 Γ ( 2 γ + 1 ) ] .
The LADM solution for Example 1 is
u ( x 1 , t 1 ) = u 0 ( x 1 , t 1 ) + u 1 ( x 1 , t 1 ) + u 2 ( x 1 , t 1 ) + u 3 ( x 1 , t 1 ) + . . . ,
v ( x 1 , t 1 ) = v 0 ( x 1 , t 1 ) + v 1 ( x 1 , t 1 ) + v 2 ( x 1 , t 1 ) + v 3 ( x 1 , t 1 ) + . . . ,
u ( x 1 , t 1 ) = η 2 sec h 2 ( α 2 + η x 1 2 ) + η 5 a tan h ( α 2 + η x 1 2 ) sec h 2 ( α 2 + η x 1 2 ) t 1 γ Γ ( γ + 1 ) + η 8 a 2 2 [ 2 cos h 2 ( α 2 + η x 1 2 ) - 3 ] sec h 4 ( α 2 + η x 1 2 ) t 1 2 γ Γ ( 2 γ + 1 ) + sin h ( α 2 + η x 1 2 ) t 1 3 γ a 3 η 4 2 Γ ( 3 γ + 1 ) Γ ( γ + 1 ) 2 cos h 7 ( α 2 + η x 1 2 ) [ 2 Γ ( γ + 1 ) 2 cos h 4 ( α 2 + η x 1 2 ) - 18 Γ ( γ + 1 ) 2 cos h 2 ( α 2 + η x 1 2 ) + 6 Γ ( 2 γ + 1 ) cos h 2 ( α 2 + η x 1 2 ) + 18 Γ ( γ + 1 ) 2 - 9 Γ ( 2 γ + 1 ) ] + . . . ,
v ( x 1 , t 1 ) = a 2 η 2 sec h 2 ( α 2 + η x 1 2 ) + η 5 a 3 2 2 tan h ( α 2 + η x 1 2 ) sec h 2 ( α 2 + η x 1 2 ) t 1 γ Γ ( γ + 1 ) + η 8 a 2 2 [ 2 cos h 2 ( α 2 + η x 1 2 ) - 3 ] sec h 4 ( α 2 + η x 1 2 ) t 1 2 γ Γ ( 2 γ + 1 ) + 2 sin h ( α 2 + η x 1 2 ) t 1 3 γ a 7 2 η 11 4 Γ ( 3 γ + 1 ) Γ ( γ + 1 ) 2 cos h 7 ( α 2 + η x 1 2 ) [ 2 Γ ( γ + 1 ) 2 cos h 4 ( α 2 + η x 1 2 ) - 18 Γ ( γ + 1 ) 2 cos h 2 ( α 2 + η x 1 2 ) + 6 Γ ( 2 γ + 1 ) cos h 2 ( α 2 + η x 1 2 ) + 18 Γ ( γ + 1 ) 2 - 9 Γ ( 2 γ + 1 ) ] + . . . ,
For γ = 1 , the exact solutions of the KdV system Equation (11) are given by
u ( x 1 , t 1 ) = η 2 sec h 2 ( α 2 + η x 1 2 - a η 3 t 1 2 ) , v ( x 1 , t 1 ) = a 2 η 2 sec h 2 ( α 2 + η x 1 2 - a η 3 t 1 2 ) .
The numerical values of Example 1 show the accuracy and efficiency of the LADM at different values of x 1 , t 1 in Table 1. In Figure 1 and Figure 2 and Table 1, we consider fixed values a = η = 0 . 5 , α = 1 and fixed order γ = 1 for piecewise approximation values of x 1 , t 1 in the domain - 10 x 1 10 and 0 . 20 t 1 1 . Figure 1a,b represent the graphs of LADM solution at γ = 1 , and error graphs a and b at γ = 1 in Figure 2 respectively of Example 1. It is clear from the Figure 1a,b that LADM solutions are in good agreement with the exact solution of the problems. There is a small difference from the solutions graph of the problem because the solution of the fractional-order problems creates a little deviation from the solution at the integer order problem. The a and b in Figure 2 show the variation of the error for different values of the variables x 1 and t 1 .
Example 2.
Consider the nonlinear dispersive long wave system of time fractional order
γ u t 1 γ = - v x 1 - 1 2 u 2 x 1 , γ v t 1 γ = - u x 1 - 3 u x 1 3 - u v x 1 , 0 < γ < 1 ,
with initial condition
u ( x 1 , 0 ) = a [ tan h ( η 2 + a x 1 2 ) + 1 ] , v ( x 1 , 0 ) = - 1 + 1 2 a 2 sec h 2 ( η 2 + a x 1 2 ) .
Taking Laplace transform of Equation (17),
L γ u t 1 γ = L - v x 1 - 1 2 u 2 x 1 ,
L γ v t 1 γ = L - u x 1 - 3 u x 1 3 - u v x 1 ,
s γ L u ( x 1 , t 1 ) - s γ - 1 u ( x 1 , 0 ) = L - v x 1 - 1 2 u 2 x 1 , s γ L v ( x 1 , t 1 ) - s γ - 1 v ( x 1 , 0 ) = L - u x 1 - 3 u x 1 3 - u v x 1 .
Applying inverse Laplace transform
u ( x 1 , t 1 ) = L - 1 u ( x 1 , 0 ) s + 1 s γ L - v x 1 - 1 2 u 2 x 1 , v ( x 1 , t 1 ) = L - 1 v ( x 1 , 0 ) s + 1 s γ L - u x 1 - 3 u x 1 3 - u v x 1 ,
u ( x 1 , t 1 ) = a [ tan h ( η 2 + a x 1 2 ) + 1 ] + L - 1 1 s γ L - v x 1 - 1 2 u 2 x 1 , v ( x 1 , t 1 ) = - 1 + 1 2 a 2 sec h 2 ( η 2 + a x 1 2 ) + L - 1 1 s γ L - u x 1 - 3 u x 1 3 - u v x 1 .
Using the ADM procedure, we get
j = 0 u j ( x 1 , t 1 ) = a [ tan h ( η 2 + a x 1 2 ) + 1 ] + L - 1 1 s γ L - j = 0 v j x 1 - 1 2 j = 0 u j 2 x 1 ,
j = 0 v j ( x 1 , t 1 ) = - 1 + 1 2 a 2 sec h 2 ( η 2 + a x 1 2 ) + L - 1 1 s γ L - j = 0 u j x 1 - j = 0 3 u j x 1 3 - j = 0 A j ( u , v ) x 1 ,
where A j ( u , v ) x 1 is Adomian polynomials, representing nonlinear terms in the above equations. The components of the above Adomian polynomials are given below
u 0 ( x 1 , t 1 ) = a [ tan h ( η 2 + a x 1 2 ) + 1 ] , v 0 ( x 1 , t 1 ) = - 1 + 1 2 a 2 sec h 2 ( η 2 + a x 1 2 ) ,
u j + 1 ( x 1 , t 1 ) = L - 1 1 s γ L - j = 0 v j x 1 - 1 2 j = 0 u j 2 x 1 ,
v j + 1 ( x 1 , t 1 ) = L - 1 1 s γ L - j = 0 u j x 1 - j = 0 3 u j x 1 3 - j = 0 A j ( u , v ) x 1 ,
for j = 0 , 1 , 2 , . .
u 1 ( x 1 , t 1 ) = L - 1 1 s γ L - v 0 x 1 - 1 2 u 0 2 x 1 , u 1 ( x 1 , t 1 ) = - a 3 2 sec h 2 ( η 2 + a x 1 2 ) L - 1 1 s γ + 1 = - a 2 2 sec h 2 ( η 2 + a x 1 2 ) t γ Γ ( γ + 1 ) , v 1 ( x 1 , t 1 ) = L - 1 1 s γ L - u 0 x 1 - 3 u 0 x 1 3 - ( u 0 v 0 ) x 1 , v 1 ( x 1 , t 1 ) = a 4 2 sin h ( η 2 + a x 1 2 ) sec h 3 ( η 2 + a x 1 2 ) L - 1 1 s γ + 1 = a 3 2 sin h ( η 2 + a x 1 2 ) sec h 3 ( η 2 + a x 1 2 ) t 1 γ Γ ( γ + 1 ) .
The subsequent terms are
u 2 ( x 1 , t 1 ) = L - 1 1 s γ L - v 1 x 1 - 1 2 u 1 2 x 1 , = - a 5 4 sec h 2 ( η 2 + a x 1 2 ) t 2 γ Γ ( 2 γ + 1 ) + 3 a 5 4 sin h 2 ( η 2 + a x 1 2 ) sec h 4 ( η 2 + a x 1 2 ) t 2 γ Γ ( 2 γ + 1 ) + a 7 4 sin h ( η 2 + a x 1 2 ) sec h 5 ( η 2 + a x 1 2 ) Γ ( 2 γ + 1 ) t 3 γ Γ ( 3 γ + 1 ) Γ ( γ + 1 ) 2 v 2 ( x 1 , t 1 ) = L - 1 1 s γ L - u 1 x 1 - 3 u 1 x 1 3 - ( u 0 v 1 ) x 1 - ( u 1 v 0 ) x 1 , = a 6 4 [ 2 cos h 2 ( η 2 + a x 1 2 ) - 3 ] sec h 4 ( η 2 + a x 1 2 ) t 1 2 γ Γ ( 2 γ + 1 ) .
The LADM solution for Example 2 is
u ( x 1 , t 1 ) = u 0 ( x 1 , t 1 ) + u 1 ( x 1 , t 1 ) + u 2 ( x 1 , t 1 ) + u 3 ( x 1 , t 1 ) + . . . ,
v ( x 1 , t 1 ) = v 0 ( x 1 , t 1 ) + v 1 ( x 1 , t 1 ) + v 2 ( x 1 , t 1 ) + v 3 ( x 1 , t 1 ) + . . . ,
u ( x 1 , t 1 ) = a [ tan h ( η 2 + a x 1 2 ) + 1 ] - a 3 2 sec h 2 ( η 2 + a x 1 2 ) t γ Γ ( γ + 1 ) - a 5 4 sec h 2 ( η 2 + a x 1 2 ) t 2 γ Γ ( 2 γ + 1 ) + 3 a 5 4 sin h 2 ( η 2 + a x 1 2 ) sec h 4 ( η 2 + a x 1 2 ) t 2 γ Γ ( 2 γ + 1 ) + a 7 4 sin h ( η 2 + a x 1 2 ) sec h 5 ( η 2 + a x 1 2 ) Γ ( 2 γ + 1 ) t 3 γ Γ ( 3 γ + 1 ) Γ ( γ + 1 ) 2 + . . . ,
v ( x 1 , t 1 ) = - 1 + 1 2 a 2 sec h 2 ( η 2 + a x 1 2 ) + a 4 2 sin h ( η 2 + a x 1 2 ) sec h 3 ( η 2 + a x 1 2 ) t 1 γ Γ ( γ + 1 ) a 6 4 [ 2 cos h 2 ( η 2 + a x 1 2 ) - 3 ] sec h 4 ( η 2 + a x 1 2 ) t 1 2 γ Γ ( 2 γ + 1 ) + . . . ,
For γ = 1 , the exact solutions of the KdV system Equation (17) are given by
u ( x 1 , t 1 ) = a [ tan h ( η 2 + a x 1 2 - a 2 t 1 2 ) + 1 ] , v ( x 1 , t 1 ) = - 1 + 1 2 a 2 sec h 2 ( η 2 + a x 1 2 - a 2 t 1 2 ) ,
where a,η are arbitrary constants.
Similarly, the numerical values of the Example 2 show the accuracy and efficiency of the LADM at different values of x 1 , t 1 in Table 2. In Figure 3 and Figure 4 and Table 2, we consider fixed values a = η = 0 . 5 , α = 1 and fixed order γ = 1 for piecewise approximation values of x 1 , t 1 in the domain - 10 x 1 10 and 0 . 20 t 1 1 . The a and b in Figure 3 represent the graphs of LADM solution at γ = 1 , and error graphs a and b at γ = 1 in Figure 4, respectively, of Example 2. It is clear from the Figure 3a,b that LADM solutions are in good agreement with the exact solution of the problems. The small difference from the solutions graph of the problem because the solution of the fractional-order problems creates a little deviation from the solution at integer order problems. The a and b in Figure 4 show the variation of the error for different values of the variables x 1 and t 1 .
Example 3.
Consider the nonlinear KdV of time-fractional order as given in [26]:
γ u t 1 γ = 6 u u x 1 - 3 u x 1 3 , 0 < γ < 1 ,
with initial condition
u ( x 1 , 0 ) = - 2 sec h 2 ( x 1 ) .
Taking Laplace transform of Equation (24),
L γ u t 1 γ = L 6 u u x 1 - 3 u x 1 3 ,
s γ L u ( x 1 , t 1 ) - s γ - 1 u ( x 1 , 0 ) = L 6 u u x 1 - 3 u x 1 3 ,
Applying inverse Laplace transform
u ( x 1 , t 1 ) = L - 1 u ( x 1 , 0 ) s + 1 s γ L 6 u u x 1 - 3 u x 1 3 ,
u ( x 1 , t 1 ) = - 2 sec h 2 ( x 1 ) + L - 1 1 s γ L 6 u u x 1 - 3 u x 1 3 .
Using ADM procedure, we get
j = 0 u j ( x 1 , t 1 ) = - 2 sec h 2 ( x 1 ) + L - 1 1 s γ L 6 j = 0 D j ( u , u x 1 ) - j = 0 3 u j x 1 3 ,
where D j ( u , u x 1 ) are Adomian polynomials, representing nonlinear terms in the above equations. The components of above Adomian polynomials are given below:
D 0 ( u , u x 1 ) = u 0 u 0 x 1 , D 1 ( u , u x 1 ) = u 0 u 1 x 1 + u 1 u 0 x 1 , D 2 ( u , u x 1 ) = u 0 u 2 x 1 + u 1 u 1 x 1 + u 2 u 0 x 1 ,
u 0 ( x 1 , t 1 ) = - 2 sec h 2 ( x 1 ) ,
j = 0 u j ( x 1 , t 1 ) = L - 1 1 s γ L 6 j = 0 D j ( u , u x 1 ) - j = 0 3 u j x 1 3 ,
for j = 0 , 1 , 2 , . .
u 1 ( x 1 , t 1 ) = L - 1 1 s γ L 6 u 0 u 0 x 1 - 3 u 0 x 1 3 , u 1 ( x 1 , t 1 ) = - 16 sec h 2 ( x 1 ) tan h 2 ( x 1 ) L - 1 1 s γ + 1 = - 16 sec h 2 ( x 1 ) tan h 2 ( x 1 ) t 1 γ Γ ( γ + 1 ) .
The subsequent terms are
u 2 ( x 1 , t 1 ) = L - 1 1 s γ L 6 u 0 u 1 x 1 + 6 u 1 u 0 x 1 - 3 u 1 x 1 3 , u 2 ( x 1 , t 1 ) = - 64 sec h 4 ( x 1 ) ( - 3 + 2 cos h 2 ( x 1 ) ) t 2 γ Γ ( 2 γ + 1 ) , u 3 ( x 1 , t 1 ) = L - 1 1 s γ L 6 u 0 u 2 x 1 + 6 u 1 u 1 x 1 + 6 u 2 u 0 x 1 - 3 u 1 x 1 3 , u 3 ( x 1 , t 1 ) = - 512 sec h 6 tan h ( x 1 ) ( - 18 Γ ( γ + 1 ) 2 cos h 2 + 18 Γ ( γ + 1 ) 2 + 2 Γ ( γ + 1 ) 2 cos h 4 + 6 Γ ( 2 γ + 1 ) cos h 2 - 9 Γ ( 2 γ + 1 ) ) t 3 γ Γ ( γ + 1 ) 2 Γ ( 3 γ + 1 ) .
The LADM solution for Example 3 is
u ( x 1 , t 1 ) = u 0 ( x 1 , t 1 ) + u 1 ( x 1 , t 1 ) + u 2 ( x 1 , t 1 ) + u 3 ( x 1 , t 1 ) + . . . ,
u ( x 1 , t 1 ) = - 2 sec h 2 ( x 1 ) - 16 sec h 2 ( x 1 ) tan h 2 ( x 1 ) t 1 γ Γ ( γ + 1 ) - 64 sec h 4 ( x 1 ) ( - 3 + 2 cos h 2 ( x 1 ) ) t 2 γ Γ ( 2 γ + 1 ) - 512 sec h 6 tan h ( x 1 ) ( - 18 Γ ( γ + 1 ) 2 cos h 2 + 18 Γ ( γ + 1 ) 2 + 2 Γ ( γ + 1 ) 2 cos h 4 + 6 Γ ( 2 γ + 1 ) cos h 2 - 9 Γ ( 2 γ + 1 ) ) t 3 γ Γ ( γ + 1 ) 2 Γ ( 3 γ + 1 ) .
The exact solution of u ( x 1 , t 1 ) is in a closed form as
u ( x 1 , t 1 ) = - 2 sec h 2 ( x 1 - 4 t 1 ) .

5. Conclusions

In this research article, we applied the Laplace–Adomian Decomposition Method for the solution of the fractional KdV type system of partial differential equations. The fractional derivatives are represented by the Caputo operator. The results of the proposed method are obtained for both fractional and integer order problems successfully. The solutions of fractional order problems are convergent to the integer order problem as fractional order approaches to integer order. Moreover, the behavior of the method is explained through graphs of different numerical examples. The analysis has confirmed that the results obtained by this method are in good contact with the exact solutions for the problems.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.S. and H.K.; Methodology, M.A.; Software, R.S.; Validation, P.K. and M.A.; Formal Analysis, R.S.; Investigation, R.S. and P.K.; Resources, H.K. and P.K.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, R.S.; Writing—Review and Editing, H.K., and P.K.; Visualization, M.A.; Supervision, M.A., P.K.; Project Administration, P.K.; Funding Acquisition, P.K.

Funding

The project was supported by the Center of Excellence in Theoretical and Computational Science (TaCS-CoE), Faculty of Science, King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi (KMUTT).

Acknowledgments

This project was supported by the Theoretical and Computational Science (TaCS) Center under Computational and Applied Science for Smart Innovation Research Cluster (CLASSIC), Faculty of Science, KMUTT.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Helal, M.A.; Mehanna, M.S. A comparative study between two different methods for solving the general Kortweg–de Vries equation (GKdV). Chaos Solitons Fractals 2007, 33, 725–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Jibran, M.; Nawaz, R.; Khan, A.; Afzal, S. Iterative Solutions of Hirota Satsuma Coupled KDV and Modified Coupled KDV Systems. Math. Probl. Eng. 2018, 2018, 9042039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Biazar, J.; Eslami, M. A new homotopy perturbation method for solving systems of partial differential equations. Comput. Math. Appl. 2011, 62, 225–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Kumar, A.; Pankaj, R.D. Laplace-Modified Decomposition Method for the Generalized Hirota-Satsuma Coupled KdV Equation. Can. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 2015, 3, 126–133. [Google Scholar]
  5. Wang, M.; Zhou, Y.; Li, Z. Application of a homogeneous balance method to exact solutions of nonlinear equations in mathematical physics. Phys. Lett. A 1996, 216, 67–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gokdogan, A.; Yildirim, A.; Merdan, M. Solving coupled-KdV equations by differential transformation method. World Appl. Sci. J. 2012, 19, 1823–1828. [Google Scholar]
  7. Jafari, H.; Firoozjaee, M.A. Homotopy analysis method for solving KdV equations. Surv. Math. Its Appl. 2010, 5, 89–98. [Google Scholar]
  8. Mohamed, M.A.; Torky, M.S. Numerical solution of nonlinear system of partial differential equations by the Laplace decomposition method and the Pade approximation. Am. J. Comput. Math. 2013, 3, 175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Seadawy, A.R.; El-Rashidy, K. Water wave solutions of the coupled system Zakharov-Kuznetsov and generalized coupled KdV equations. Sci. World J. 2014, 2014, 724759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. González-Gaxiola, O. The Laplace–Adomian Decomposition Method Applied to the Kundu-Eckhaus Equation. arXiv 2017, arXiv:1704.07730. [Google Scholar]
  11. Alhendi, F.A.; Alderremy, A.A. Numerical Solutions of Three-Dimensional Coupled Burgers’ Equations by Using Some Numerical Methods. J. Appl. Math. Phys. 2016, 4, 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jafari, H.; Khalique, C.M.; Nazari, M. Application of the Laplace decomposition method for solving linear and nonlinear fractional diffusion–wave equations. Appl. Math. Lett. 2011, 24, 1799–1805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Khan, M.; Hussain, M.; Jafari, H.; Khan, Y. Application of Laplace decomposition method to solve nonlinear coupled partial differential equations. World Appl. Sci. J. 2010, 9, 13–19. [Google Scholar]
  14. Khan, M.; Hussain, M. Application of Laplace decomposition method on semi-infinite domain. Numer. Algorithms 2011, 56, 211–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mohamed, M.Z. Comparison between the Laplace Decomposition Method and Adomian Decomposition in Time-Space Fractional Nonlinear Fractional Differential Equations. Appl. Math. 2018, 9, 448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Al-Zurigat, M. Solving nonlinear fractional differential equation using a multi-step Laplace Adomian decomposition method. Ann. Univ. Craiova-Math. Comput. Sci. Ser. 2012, 39, 200–210. [Google Scholar]
  17. Haq, F.; Shah, K.; ur Rahman, G.; Shahzad, M. Numerical solution of fractional order smoking model via laplace Adomian decomposition method. Alex. Eng. J. 2018, 57, 1061–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Haq, F.; Shah, K.; Khan, A.; Shahzad, M.; Rahman, G. Numerical solution of fractional order epidemic model of a vector born disease by Laplace Adomian decomposition method. Punjab Univ. J. Math. 2017, 49, 13–22. [Google Scholar]
  19. Mahmood, S.; Shah, R.; Arif, M. Laplace Adomian Decomposition Method for Multi Dimensional Time Fractional Model of Navier-Stokes Equation. Symmetry 2019, 11, 149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Shah, R.; Khan, H.; Arif, M.; Kumam, P. Application of Laplace–Adomian Decomposition Method for the Analytical Solution of Third-Order Dispersive Fractional Partial Differential Equations. Entropy 2019, 21, 335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Thabet, H.; Kendre, S.; Chalishajar, D. New analytical technique for solving a system of nonlinear fractional partial differential equations. Mathematics 2017, 5, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Miller, K.S.; Ross, B. An Introduction to the Fractional Calculus and Fractional Differential Equations; Wiley-Interscience: New York, NY, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  23. Hilfer, R. Applications of Fractional Calculus in Physics; World Sci. Publishing: River Edge, NJ, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  24. Podlubny, I. Fractional Differential Equations: An Introduction to Fractional Derivatives, Fractional Differential Equations, to Methods of Their Solution and Some of Their Applications; Elsevier: New York, NY, USA, 1998; Volume 198. [Google Scholar]
  25. Naghipour, A.; Manafian, J. Application of the Laplace Adomian decomposition and implicit methods for solving Burgers’ equation. TWMS J. Pure Appl. Math. 2015, 6, 68–77. [Google Scholar]
  26. Kaya, D. An application of the decomposition method for the KdVB equation. Appl. Math. Comput. 2004, 152, 279–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The LADM solution of (a) u ( x 1 , t 1 ) and (b) v ( x 1 , t 1 ) of Example 1 a t γ = 1 .
Figure 1. The LADM solution of (a) u ( x 1 , t 1 ) and (b) v ( x 1 , t 1 ) of Example 1 a t γ = 1 .
Mathematics 07 00505 g001
Figure 2. The error plots of (a) u ( x 1 , t 1 ) and (b) v ( x 1 , t 1 ) of Example 1.
Figure 2. The error plots of (a) u ( x 1 , t 1 ) and (b) v ( x 1 , t 1 ) of Example 1.
Mathematics 07 00505 g002
Figure 3. The LADM solution of (a) u ( x 1 , t 1 ) and (b) v ( x 1 , t 1 ) of Example 2 a t γ = 1 .
Figure 3. The LADM solution of (a) u ( x 1 , t 1 ) and (b) v ( x 1 , t 1 ) of Example 2 a t γ = 1 .
Mathematics 07 00505 g003
Figure 4. The error plots of (a) u ( x 1 , t 1 ) and (b) v ( x 1 , t 1 ) of Example 2.
Figure 4. The error plots of (a) u ( x 1 , t 1 ) and (b) v ( x 1 , t 1 ) of Example 2.
Mathematics 07 00505 g004
Table 1. Solution of LADM for different values of γ when η = 0 . 001 and Absolute Error (AE) of Example 1.
Table 1. Solution of LADM for different values of γ when η = 0 . 001 and Absolute Error (AE) of Example 1.
LADM γ = 0 . 55 γ = 1 Ex( γ = 1 ) AE
x 1 t 1 u LADM v LADM u LADM v LADM u EX v EX u EX - u app v EX - v app
−100.10.0176350.0027880.0176540.0027910.0176610.0027917.449 × 10 - 6 4.928 × 10 - 7
0.30.0176130.0027850.0176370.0027890.0176590.0027872.238 × 10 - 5 1.478 × 10 - 6
0.50.0175970.0027830.0176200.0027860.0176570.0027843.727 × 10 - 5 2.464 × 10 - 6
00.10.1967550.0311070.1966570.0310930.1966170.0310963.975 × 10 - 5 2.629 × 10 - 6
0.30.1968750.0311230.1967480.0311060.1966280.0311141.192 × 10 - 4 7.889 × 10 - 6
0.50.1969610.0311350.1968390.0311180.1966400.0311311.987 × 10 - 4 1.314 × 10 - 5
100.10.0024700.0003900.0024670.0003900.0024660.0003901.073 × 10 - 6 7.100 × 10 - 8
0.30.0024730.0003900.0024700.0003900.0024660.0003903.221 × 10 - 6 2.131 × 10 - 7
0.50.0024750.0003910.0024720.0003900.0024670.0003915.368 × 10 - 6 3.552 × 10 - 7
Table 2. Solution of LADM for different value of γ when η = 0 . 001 and Absolute Error of Example 2.
Table 2. Solution of LADM for different value of γ when η = 0 . 001 and Absolute Error of Example 2.
LADM γ = 0 . 55 γ = 1 Ex( γ = 1 ) AE
x 1 t 1 u LADM v LADM u LADM v LADM u EX v EX u EX - u app v EX - v app
−100.10.010173−0.989530.010718−0.989260.010718−0.989391.210 × 10 - 7 1.312 × 10 - 4
0.30.009571−0.989820.010200−0.989510.010201−0.989906.351 × 10 - 7 3.848 × 10 - 4
0.50.009181−0.990010.009707−0.989750.009708−0.990385.301 × 10 - 7 6.274 × 10 - 4
00.10.603381−0.762940.616554−0.764290.616566−0.763581.230 × 10 - 5 7.041 × 10 - 4
0.30.586890−0.761580.604564−0.762970.604679−0.760951.141 × 10 - 4 2.015 × 10 - 3
0.50.574744−0.760810.592339−0.761770.592666−0.758583.267 × 10 - 4 3.188 × 10 - 3
100.10.995627−0.995770.995829−0.995890.995827−0.995842.502 × 10 - 6 5.088 × 10 - 5
0.30.995404−0.995620.995636−0.995790.995614−0.995632.271 × 10 - 5 1.566 × 10 - 4
0.50.995261−0.995500.995454−0.995670.995390−0.995416.364 × 10 - 5 2.680 × 10 - 4

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shah, R.; Khan, H.; Kumam, P.; Arif, M. An Analytical Technique to Solve the System of Nonlinear Fractional Partial Differential Equations. Mathematics 2019, 7, 505. https://doi.org/10.3390/math7060505

AMA Style

Shah R, Khan H, Kumam P, Arif M. An Analytical Technique to Solve the System of Nonlinear Fractional Partial Differential Equations. Mathematics. 2019; 7(6):505. https://doi.org/10.3390/math7060505

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shah, Rasool, Hassan Khan, Poom Kumam, and Muhammad Arif. 2019. "An Analytical Technique to Solve the System of Nonlinear Fractional Partial Differential Equations" Mathematics 7, no. 6: 505. https://doi.org/10.3390/math7060505

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop